Slashdot Mirror


Using Nanotechnology To Build Thinner, Stronger Condoms

Hugh Pickens DOT Com writes "Discovery Magazine reports that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has granted $100,000 to Boston University School of Medicine (BUSM) and Boston Medical Center (BMC) to develop a nanoparticle coating for condoms that will make them more comfortable and stronger while simultaneously keeping them thin to preserve – and increase – sensation in order to make them more appealing to use. According to the Gates Foundation, in the time that condoms have been in use, not much has changed: '[Condoms] have undergone very little technological improvement in the past 50 years. The primary improvement has been the use of latex as the primary material and quality-control measures, which allow for quality testing of each individual condom. Material science and our understanding of neurobiology has undergone revolutionary transformation in the last decade, yet that knowledge has not been applied to improve the product attributes of one of the most ubiquitous and potentially underutilized products on earth.' The nanotechnology that the Boston doctors intend to use for their improved condoms will be superhydrophillic nanoparticles that coat the condom and trap water to make them more resilient and easier to use. 'We believe that by altering the mechanical forces experienced by the condom, we may ultimately be able to make a thinner condom which reduces friction, thereby reducing discomfort associated with friction increases pleasure, thereby increasing condom use and decreases rates of unwanted pregnancy and infection transmission.'"

253 comments

  1. TLDR, Boston, nano-condoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now you know, ladies.

    1. Re:TLDR, Boston, nano-condoms by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Informative
      Definitely need to make them so they give more sensation.

      Frankly, I find them akin to eating steak with one on your tongue.

      A lot of effort, for no sensation at all. Hell, I find it hard to blow a nut with one on, hence I rarely use them.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:TLDR, Boston, nano-condoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wishing there was a "Too Informative" right about now...

    3. Re:TLDR, Boston, nano-condoms by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      Nano condom, sounds like a description of the size you buy in the stores.

    4. Re:TLDR, Boston, nano-condoms by lgw · · Score: 5, Funny

      So close to the right joke.

      Gates Foundation gives $100,000 to help invent micro, soft condoms.

      There we go.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    5. Re:TLDR, Boston, nano-condoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      i cant finish if im drunk, so as long as i know the girl is not going to infect my prick with something, i forego the condom and bang away until she's tired of it. still have condoms nearby though, for those girls i cant be certain of and for when im not sloshed. its definitely not as good as raw-dogging, but requires less thought to be safe.

    6. Re:TLDR, Boston, nano-condoms by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      Can you imagine how embarrassing it is to ask the clerk for a nano condom?
      ("sorry, do you have anything smaller, say in the micron range?")

    7. Re:TLDR, Boston, nano-condoms by Bayoudegradeable · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hence I rarely use them?? Ahem, this is slashdot... THAT is why you rarely use them....

      --
      Sig Registration Form 34c_766(a) submitted to Ministry of Signature Management. Approval pending.
    8. Re:TLDR, Boston, nano-condoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nano is less than Micro.

      Nerd FAIL, turn in your Geek Card.

    9. Re:TLDR, Boston, nano-condoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Definitely need to make them so they give more sensation.

      A lot of effort, for no sensation at all. Hell, I find it hard to blow a nut with one on, hence I rarely use them.

      I've busted nuts many times, but I've never had a desire to blow a nut. If you think the prophylactic is the problem, tell your partner to RTFM — it's only supposed to cover the shaft; not his nuts.

    10. Re:TLDR, Boston, nano-condoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Circumcised? Fucking a hoe-bag with a hallway-sized cavity between the legs? Really over the hill? The chick you are banging just too ugly?

      I'm just curious since I have no problem with one on.

    11. Re:TLDR, Boston, nano-condoms by GumphMaster · · Score: 1

      Should sell well in India: Condoms 'too big' for Indian men (although I don't really see how being shorter than international norms is a problem: I just doesn't unroll as far, but it still unrolls snugly all the way).

      --
      Patent litigation: A doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction... in which everyone seems willing to push the button
    12. Re:TLDR, Boston, nano-condoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never use condoms for entirely different reasons.

    13. Re:TLDR, Boston, nano-condoms by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      I'm the other way around. I'm what you might call a 2-pump-chump, and putting on the condom greatly increases the duration of sex for me. The thicker the better. Sometimes wearing two or even three does the job for me!

    14. Re:TLDR, Boston, nano-condoms by gargleblast · · Score: 1

      Shotgun marriage in 266, 265, 264 ...

    15. Re:TLDR, Boston, nano-condoms by TripleE78 · · Score: 1

      And most of /. is wishing they had a reason to use a condom that didn't involve balloon animals.

  2. Ohhhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No more rubber burn... NICE!

    1. Re:Ohhhh by tripleevenfall · · Score: 5, Funny

      I agree, this will be fantastic. I'm sick of wearing these bandages on my hands all the time.

  3. i want to be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a beta tester

    1. Re:i want to be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You have to bring your own test system that includes both sides, so you are likely out of the running.

  4. Thinner, Stronger Condoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    News for nerds.

    1. Re:Thinner, Stronger Condoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not really for nerds... since nerds never get the chance to use one!

    2. Re:Thinner, Stronger Condoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Woooosh

    3. Re:Thinner, Stronger Condoms by nahpets77 · · Score: 0

      Your comment made me chuckle. I tried modding funny but somehow "Troll". Replying to this to undo moderation.

    4. Re: Thinner, Stronger Condoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awesome! Now the slashdot crowd can practice making even more amazing balloon animals!?!

    5. Re:Thinner, Stronger Condoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Thinner, Stronger Condoms:
      Stuff that matters.

      Condoms:
      News for nerds.

    6. Re:Thinner, Stronger Condoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You my friend have never heard of a posh wank.

    7. Re:Thinner, Stronger Condoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You my friend have never heard of a posh wank.

      Does that somehow involve Posh Spice? If so I'll pass just the same, thanks.

    8. Re:Thinner, Stronger Condoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      News for nerds.

      Funnily this article has already been tagged "donotwant".

    9. Re:Thinner, Stronger Condoms by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Apparently all the jokes about Micro-soft were actually Chinese whispers of Nano-hard.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    10. Re:Thinner, Stronger Condoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know what the fuck a "Chinese whisper" is, but it sounds racist!

    11. Re:Thinner, Stronger Condoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You my friend have never heard of a posh wank.

      Ah, yes, the posh wank, a.k.a. "hand job" — the plutocratic jerk-off.

  5. Reduced Friction? by amiga3D · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Isn't friction what generates sensation? That's part of the problem with condoms now, no feeling.

    1. Re:Reduced Friction? by BringsApples · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not completely. Condoms squeeze the guy, sometimes (depending on girth) causing complete loss of sensation (much like cutting off the blood from you foot or arm). This same squeezing also causes less, how shall I say it, 'back-and-forth' of the skin on the penis. I don't know what the sensation is like for women, but they seem to hate them as much as men.

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    2. Re:Reduced Friction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Condoms squeeze the guy, sometimes (depending on girth) causing complete loss of sensation (much like cutting off the blood from you foot or arm). This same squeezing also causes less, how shall I say it, 'back-and-forth' of the skin on the penis.

      Citation please?

    3. Re:Reduced Friction? by Max+Threshold · · Score: 2

      This is what Trojan Magnums are for.

    4. Re:Reduced Friction? by Antipater · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Condoms squeeze the guy, sometimes (depending on girth) causing complete loss of sensation (much like cutting off the blood from you foot or arm).

      This is important. I hope, while they're redesigning the materials, they also do something to combat the "one size fits all" myth of modern condoms. Many people's aversion to condoms are a result of a size mismatch. Penises come in many different sizes, not just "regular" and "magnum", so what's comfortable for one man may not be for another. A condom that's too tight can cut off all sensation, while a condom that's too loose can slip or tear. Nobody advertises one-size-fits-all running shoes, but one-size-fits-all condoms are our only option. I hope Mr. Gates works to fix that as well.

      --
      Everything is better with chainsaws.
    5. Re:Reduced Friction? by QilessQi · · Score: 4, Informative

      It depends on whose sensation we're talking about. :-) The wearer should experience almost no friction from the latex itself, since it's supposed to stay more-or-less in place. But the latex is thin enough that he can sense the temperature and "grip" of his partner, which is probably the primary stimulating sensation for him.

      His partner, on the other hand, would certainly experience friction from the latex, which is one reason you should use lube with condoms -- too much friction, and thrusting becomes difficult for the pair and especially irritating (or painful) for the person being penetrated. That leads to irritation, soreness, and an eventual halting of adult activities.

      (PSA: Make sure to choose the right lube for the condom you use -- some lubes will cause the material of the condom to fail, which leads to babies, and possibly also a halting of adult activities. But also talk to your partner -- certain women report high incidents of yeast infections after using certain types of lube.)

      So I can see a thinner, lower-friction condom being a boon for both partners, as it would increase sensation for both, and also lead to fewer incidents of vaginal/anal tearing from friction, which are not only not fun but which also which increase risk of STD transmission.

    6. Re:Reduced Friction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually its more like the lack of friction that generates sensation. put some lube inside the condom. you'll thank me.

    7. Re:Reduced Friction? by poetmatt · · Score: 3, Informative

      "one size fits all" myth of modern condoms

      This doesn't exist. Condoms come in multiple sizes, and anyone who thinks there is a one size fits all is actually very misinformed about condoms.

    8. Re:Reduced Friction? by JamieIanMacgregor · · Score: 5, Funny

      you'll need an outlet store with a computerised fitting system by the sounds of it. here, poke your member in this hole while we 3d scan it. oh, and watch this porn.

    9. Re:Reduced Friction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They're actually not any wider than your standard condoms.

    10. Re:Reduced Friction? by barlevg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      this, I think, is more of a societal issue: not many men are going to feel comfortable going to the convenience store and checking out with a box of "size smalls." Shopping on the internet is an option, I guess, but do you really want Amazon knowing your penis size? I can just imagine the targeted advertisements on BOTH ends of the spectrum.

    11. Re:Reduced Friction? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      this, I think, is more of a societal issue: not many men are going to feel comfortable going to the convenience store and checking out with a box of "size smalls." Shopping on the internet is an option, I guess, but do you really want Amazon knowing your penis size? I can just imagine the targeted advertisements on BOTH ends of the spectrum.

      Easy solution. Have her get on the pill, and make sure she takes it like she's supposed to (those "I can't remember if I took it" scares suck!!).

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    12. Re:Reduced Friction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not completely. Condoms squeeze the guy, sometimes (depending on girth) causing complete loss of sensation (much like cutting off the blood from you foot or arm). This same squeezing also causes less, how shall I say it, 'back-and-forth' of the skin on the penis. I don't know what the sensation is like for women, but they seem to hate them as much as men.

      I'm quite sure that for women it is only psychological (not to say not important for the experience) whether the man has a condom or not. For men, it seems you are talking about a really bad fit size wise. Condoms do exist in multiple sizes and thickness - go to a specialty store and buy a range to try. For many men, if a condom is helping to stay in the game a little while longer this is a plus for your partner ;-)

    13. Re:Reduced Friction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Strangers in the night, exchanging rubbers.

      This ones much too tight, I need another.

      This ones much too loose, I'm losing all my juice.

    14. Re:Reduced Friction? by Max+Threshold · · Score: 1

      Then they must be more elastic. They're certainly different in some important way.

    15. Re:Reduced Friction? by BringsApples · · Score: 1

      Those can be tight for some men also. Penises do not come in 2 sizes (regular and magnum). BTW, magnum condoms aren't very much wider than "regular" sized condoms, and seem to stretch even less.

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    16. Re:Reduced Friction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OR... IF you are done having kids like me, just visit the doctor and get snipped. Works like a charm and made me big points with the Wife....

      Oh.. Wait... This is Slashdot.

      All you single fellas out there don't have sex you don't pay for anyway.. Forget it and put on the condom, EVERY time.

    17. Re:Reduced Friction? by DigiShaman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A condom that's too tight can cut off all sensation, while a condom that's too loose can slip or tear. Nobody advertises one-size-fits-all running shoes, but one-size-fits-all condoms are our only option.

      Length isn't usually an issue (for most men) as can you roll as much as needed to the base. But as you've pointed out, girth is. The girth of a man's member can dynamically change based on arousal and any length of time. So while that "magnum" may feel right now, it can become loose later before climax has been reached. It's already an issue having to interrupt the moment to roll on a rubber, but having to choose which size works best depending on the mood already kills it.

      Preventing pregnancy aside, smart phones with terahertz scanning capability (say 6 years from now) might be able to detect STDs and other blood related issues in the future. Essentially a Tricorder that's not a medical device, but just as damn near as good. So if you're clean, and she's clean, to hell with the condom. Have fun! Just be sure to scan well before the mood sets in. Personally, i've never been promiscuous and trust is always important to me (I'm married). So all that technology is a moot point as far as i'm concerned.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    18. Re:Reduced Friction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Except condoms also prevent the spread of diseases, which I assume is what the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is interested in as that's closer to their main mission (their focus has been malaria, so I assume this is about AIDS).

      Anyway, there's much better ways to do birth control that don't require remembering to take a pill every day at the same time. And they tend to be more effective as well.

    19. Re:Reduced Friction? by hazah · · Score: 2

      It's definitely not psychological. According to my anecdotal evidence.

    20. Re:Reduced Friction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will they also have 'left-bend' and 'right-bend' options?

    21. Re:Reduced Friction? by spasm · · Score: 1

      Wasn't there a story about a propaganda stunt during WWII involving "accidentally" dropping comfort & care supplies intended for one's own troops on the enemy; the care packages contained boxes labeled 'Standard size condoms' containing extra extra large size condoms?

    22. Re:Reduced Friction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's definitely not psychological. According to my anecdotal evidence.

      We need to do a double blind study ;)

    23. Re:Reduced Friction? by SpankiMonki · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...not many men are going to feel comfortable going to the convenience store and checking out with a box of "size smalls."

      You're right! Small condoms should be labeled "Tall", with larger sizes labeled "Grande", "Venti", and "Trenta".

      I bet they could charge a lot more for condoms if they did that.

    24. Re:Reduced Friction? by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      ...he can sense the temperature and "grip" of his partner

      Stewie: So, is there any tread left on the tires? Or at this point would it be like throwing a hot dog down a hallway?

    25. Re:Reduced Friction? by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

      ... for women, but they seem to hate them as much as men.

      Umm . . . not true. Some things are better if they take longer. And you can get textured condoms which are more effective.

    26. Re:Reduced Friction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Condoms squeeze the guy, sometimes (depending on girth) causing complete loss of sensation (much like cutting off the blood from you foot or arm). This same squeezing also causes less, how shall I say it, 'back-and-forth' of the skin on the penis.

      Citation please?

      ...with pictures please?

    27. Re:Reduced Friction? by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

      Additional caution: Some people are allergic to lube, especially anyone known to have allergies to antibiotics - even the supposedly hypoallergenic stuff has preservative.

    28. Re:Reduced Friction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could try female condoms. The problem becomes basically the reverse, more friction on the penis less on the vagina.
      We found that using lube on both in and outside of the female condom works best for us, which sort of shares the friction between us.

    29. Re:Reduced Friction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They perform the important sexual function of ego-stroking.

    30. Re:Reduced Friction? by operagost · · Score: 1

      Customer 1 is using the condom sizer while another (creepy customer watches).

      Customer 2: Are you jellin'? *snicker*
      Customer 1: No. Are you jelly? (points to size on screen)

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    31. Re:Reduced Friction? by S.O.B. · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're right! Small condoms should be labeled "Tall", with larger sizes labeled "Grande", "Venti", and "Trenta".

      I bet they could charge a lot more for condoms if they did that.

      Over price condoms with pretentious names for the sizes...we can call them Starf*cks.

      --
      Some of what I say is fact, some is conjecture, the rest I'm just blowing out my ass...you guess.
    32. Re:Reduced Friction? by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

      Condoms, even the bare skin types still take some sensation out. For me its the tight fit that squeezes my member a bit too much. I'm no long dong silver but I do have a thick johnson so the condoms I have tried don't feel right.

      I will admit, with my past few GF's I have only used a condom a handful of times when we first start having sex. After that it becomes very spontaneous and none of us always had one on hand. So we start barebacking from there on out. Pregnancy is prevented the old fashioned way, pull out and splooge.

    33. Re:Reduced Friction? by amicusNYCL · · Score: 4, Funny

      I didn't do very well in history class, but I'm pretty sure you're referring to The Battle Of The Bulge.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    34. Re:Reduced Friction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is a BAD approach dude.
      if you enjoy your freedom, do not follow this approach
      get her on the pill or f*ck her a$$ or face.
      don't make bad decisions.

    35. Re:Reduced Friction? by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      Get rid of the texutal label (small, medium, large, etc) and replace it with a numerical circumference.

      e.g.
      3"
      3.5"
      4"
      4.5"
      5"
      5.5"
      6"

      Then you can find the right size for you. Kind of like shoe size.

    36. Re:Reduced Friction? by SpankiMonki · · Score: 1

      Over price condoms with pretentious names for the sizes...we can call them Starf*cks.

      LOL! (wish I had a mod point)

    37. Re:Reduced Friction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I swear, Your Honor. I wasn't taking an upskirt photo of her. I was simply making sure she was clean before I propositioned her for sex!"

    38. Re:Reduced Friction? by DoubleJ1024 · · Score: 1

      My kingdom for a mod point.

    39. Re:Reduced Friction? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Right, and you head into the drug store as a teenager to get your first fitting.

    40. Re:Reduced Friction? by QilessQi · · Score: 1

      I see your Stewie, and raise with Stewie and Brian:

      Stewie: So you finally did it, huh? Well look, Brian, as your friend I should tell you that that vagina is just ground zero, man. I mean, I just wrecked that thing on the way out. And just to be a jerk, I carved "Brooks Was Here" on the wall. Did you see that? Did you see "Brooks Was Here"?
      Brian: We didn't have sex.
      Stewie: Of course with Chris coming out before me, I pretty much just walked outta there. Didn't even have to stoop over. There was even room to twirl a cane as I strolled.
      Brian: You're exaggerating.
      Stewie: Only a little bit! That's the messed up thing!

    41. Re:Reduced Friction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >You're right! Small condoms should be labeled "Tall", with larger sizes labeled "Grande", "Venti", and "Trenta".

      Or "Asian", "White", and "Black".

    42. Re:Reduced Friction? by Cammi · · Score: 1

      I want to buy "Mango Sized"!!!!

    43. Re:Reduced Friction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has the semi-dry silicone lube used in some condoms (or at least, that used to be used) ever been available as a standalone product? I remember Trojan used to use some kind of funky nonstaining semi-dry lube that was nevertheless borderline magic (SK-77?), but it seems like all the condoms sold now use cheap water-based lube that dries out in something like 30 seconds under a ceiling fan. Personally, water-based lube just feels totally gross and sticky to me, and my experiments with aftermarket silicone lube taught me to never, ever let it come in contact with clothing or bedsheets you care about. And even the silicone lube feels like slimy water-based lube that just happens to not dry out (and is instant and eternal death to clothing, bedsheets, and any other fabric it comes into contact with). I'd kill to be able to buy a jar of the magic, powdery-yet-slippery stuff that only seems to exist as a pre-applied lube.

    44. Re:Reduced Friction? by Zynder · · Score: 4, Funny

      Won't work. This falls into a category woman deal with all the time. In order to psychologically attract a buyer, many companies will sell tent size dresses that are only a size 6. No 2 company's size 6 will be the same either so it makes fitting a chore. A man with a small penis who's self conscious about it will not buy a 3", he'll want the 12" (even though it is actually a 3) and you'll find companies who will advertise "Our size 6's are bigger than all the competition!" And when I started typing this I intended to make it funny, but now that it's time for the punchline, I got nothing...much like my nonexistent penis.....sigh....

    45. Re:Reduced Friction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did it pass the smell test?

    46. Re:Reduced Friction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I smell a new job market.

      I would apply, but, y'know, we haven't got universal healthcare yet.

    47. Re:Reduced Friction? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Now we're really straying from "News for Nerds."

    48. Re:Reduced Friction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      On one hand, this is a horrifying possibility.

      Can you imagine the resulting discrimination against people with various diseases? As if HIV+ folks didn't have life hard enough as it is, everyone being able to scan them and sero-sort against them automatically with no permissions or privacy at all? What about tampering / hacking with your scanner? You think roofies are bad? Ohhhh nelly, you ain't seen nothin' till that cute guy walks up to proposition you while his cellphone is hacking yours to display that he's "clean" (what a despicable word to apply to humans beings).

      And on the other hand, this is still a horrifying possibility.

      You think diseases are the only thing people will be sorting themselves for? You think trust and privacy is the only thing that would be breached?

      It's all fun and games until you are the person being excluded from society because of biology beyond your control.

    49. Re:Reduced Friction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pull and spray has kept me child free for damned near 40 years! The key to success is control. You can't be one of those dudes that has the drooling cock, aka pre-cum. If your dick starts oozing the minute you get a boner then you need a rubber plain and simple. However if you can cum on demand or precisely when you want to, pull n spray works just fine. Does nothing for disease though, and this method is not recommended for banging a random bar whore. If you're married though, it works if you are the master of your penis.

    50. Re: Reduced Friction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No need to imagine, just turn off your email spam filter for about an hour.

    51. Re:Reduced Friction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lubrication is not always needed. It depends on the woman. Yes, many don't get very wet but some do. I used to have this one girlfriend that would get literally dripping wet before we even started.

    52. Re:Reduced Friction? by Immerman · · Score: 1

      I don't know - one of the single biggest health problems in the world right now is over-large families - even just one more kid than you can afford means everyone grows up malnourished (assuming they survive), which translates pretty directly to less healthy and less intelligent. Of course condoms are among the the least effective and most expensive of modern contraceptive options, so yeah, disease is probably the bigger concern here.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    53. Re:Reduced Friction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Give it 10 years. You might be able to scan and sequence someone's DNA from a smartphone, and upload it to a cloud based service for further post-processed analysis. You're looking at 770MB worth of data uncompressed for each person.

      http://gizmodo.com/5993925/sequence-your-dna-in-an-hour-on-this-tiny-chip

    54. Re:Reduced Friction? by dargaud · · Score: 1

      Another seldom mentioned issue is that you can't come in them and keep going: they simply blow up within seconds if you do that. Which means that if man comes first, he can't do the effort to keep going until the girl comes.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    55. Re:Reduced Friction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know what the sensation is like for women, but they seem to hate them as much as men.

      SO you rarely get laid? If women can use vibrators, and dildos and get off without complaining...

      Theres no doubt condoms feel just as different or strange to a women, you talking about latex rubbing in and out of there "who haa's" as opposed to flesh on flesh. I've even heard, but never looked into this, that some women claim to be allergic to latex in there "who haa's".

    56. Re:Reduced Friction? by anubi · · Score: 1

      Thanks, AC.

      As far as I am concerned, you posted the most informative comment on this whole topic, and I had no modpoints.

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

    57. Re:Reduced Friction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this, I think, is more of a societal issue: not many men are going to feel comfortable going to the convenience store and checking out with a box of "size smalls." Shopping on the internet is an option, I guess, but do you really want Amazon knowing your penis size? I can just imagine the targeted advertisements on BOTH ends of the spectrum.

      Hmm... so your concern is that companies will start to advertise penis enlargement pills and procedures on the Internet?

    58. Re:Reduced Friction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this, I think, is more of a societal issue: not many men are going to feel comfortable going to the convenience store and checking out with a box of "size smalls." Shopping on the internet is an option, I guess, but do you really want Amazon knowing your penis size? I can just imagine the targeted advertisements on BOTH ends of the spectrum.

      It might lead to further enhancements of algorithms that match people together on dating sites. I have had a 35-year-old woman say that it feels good to fuck me because I'm "not so big that it hurts" but my ego is not shattered because an 18-year-old girl said mine was "pretty massive" and another 18-year-old said "you're so fucking big that it hurts" (neither of the latter two was a virgin, though).

    59. Re:Reduced Friction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I found a good er... tip on condom comfort in a book years ago: put a bit of lube on your tip before putting on the condom. This will spread around during coitus, allowing the condom to slide at the "business end" while staying put at the base. The result is increased stimulation for the man.

      On the downside, if done wrong, this can also increase the chance of having a "breakthrough" experience. So use with caution.

    60. Re:Reduced Friction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He said circumference, not length?

    61. Re:Reduced Friction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get rid of the texutal label (small, medium, large, etc) and replace it with a numerical circumference.

      e.g.
      3"
      3.5"
      4"
      4.5"
      5"
      5.5"
      6"

      Then you can find the right size for you. Kind of like shoe size.

      Thats not enough. What about length? It is interesting reading assumptions of size even by the men. A mans penis has a circumference and a length and for those of us who are bigger than the average bear in both dimensions it is a pain to find fitting trousers and condoms.

      Nobody is a standard size so after suffering king size for a while I found an online service who make them to the right size (theyfit.co.uk).

    62. Re:Reduced Friction? by guyniraxn · · Score: 1
    63. Re:Reduced Friction? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Easy solution. Have her get on the pill

      It's not an easy solution. It's fine for some women, but most women experience side effects which can include weight gain or lack of sexual appetite. It's also quite possible to impregnate a woman who is taking the pill correctly, or anyway, it happens.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    64. Re:Reduced Friction? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It certainly exists in the UK and Japan, the two countries where I have bought condoms. In both countries 90% of available products don't even state the size on the packet, they are only differentiated by features. In the UK that tends to be ribbed, "enhanced sensation" and flavoured. In Japan it's mostly about how thick the material is, typically 0.02 or 0.01mm.

      In the UK many places don't even offer different sizes, such as vending machines. You would have to go to a chemist to get smaller/larger ones, and most men would be embarrassed to buy for small ones. In Japan extra large ones are widely available, although they seem normal sized to me (I'm Caucasian). Crucially though you have to remember to buy them because if you go to a love hotel (a hotel you can rent for a few hours, not sleazy and very popular here) they only ever provide the standard size which is too small for me.

      Personally I find even the larger, extra thin ones reduce sensation a lot. I can put up with the Japanese ones but the UK ones are all awful, even the "extra sensation" ones. There is zero feeling for me, if I had to use them I'd prefer just to not have sex.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    65. Re:Reduced Friction? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      So why don't women have the same problem with bra sizes? They seem to be able to buy an A or B cup okay. My guess is that it's because boob size isn't something you can easily hide, except perhaps with a padded bra which is itself a huge give-away when you are shopping for one. Do women get targeted with ads based on bra size?

      The solution is for men to start wearing really tight trousers so that the size of their penis is clearly visible to everyone. Some guys like small boobs, maybe some women like "extra comfortable" small penises? Whatever, we have to try and combat this obsession with size.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    66. Re:Reduced Friction? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I really don't want to live in a world where anyone with a smartphone can scan me and see details of my personal health and medical issues. I'm not talking about STDs in particular, there is a lot of medical data I don't want to share with every random stranger I encounter, or even my close friends.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    67. Re:Reduced Friction? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      We need to invent a better way of safely having sex than putting a bag over your dick, is what it boils down to.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    68. Re:Reduced Friction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not completely. Condoms squeeze the guy, sometimes (depending on girth) causing complete loss of sensation (much like cutting off the blood from you foot or arm). This same squeezing also causes less, how shall I say it, 'back-and-forth' of the skin on the penis. I don't know what the sensation is like for women, but they seem to hate them as much as men.

      I'm quite sure that for women it is only psychological (not to say not important for the experience) whether the man has a condom or not. For men, it seems you are talking about a really bad fit size wise. Condoms do exist in multiple sizes and thickness - go to a specialty store and buy a range to try. For many men, if a condom is helping to stay in the game a little while longer this is a plus for your partner ;-)

      Different brands are different sizes as well. There are quite a variety of sizes out there if a brand name isn't important to you.

    69. Re:Reduced Friction? by barlevg · · Score: 1

      The other issue is that there's no condom equivalent of Victoria's Secret (where you buy products from clerks of your own gender who are--at the very least supposed to be--trained to be discreet and not to judge). If there were, that would probably be the creepiest store in any mall. Ever.

    70. Re:Reduced Friction? by LongearedBat · · Score: 1

      Also, they should sell different sizes and shapes in one box, each one clearly labeled, so that after going through the box one has a better idea of what model to buy a whole box of. That would be better than wasting money on box after box of misfitting condoms.

    71. Re:Reduced Friction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... for women, but they seem to hate them as much as men.

      Umm . . . not true. Some things are better if they take longer. And you can get textured condoms which are more effective.

      Actually very true, according to my experiences. To the point where the women are prepared to have unprotected sex because the condoms are so uncomfortable to them.

    72. Re:Reduced Friction? by TeknoHog · · Score: 1
      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    73. Re:Reduced Friction? by cellocgw · · Score: 3, Funny

      Pregnancy is prevented the old fashioned way, pull out and splooge.

      The official medical term for people like you is "parents."

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
    74. Re:Reduced Friction? by Zynder · · Score: 1

      Yep he did. Bigger numbers be bigger numbers no matter the direction. Besides, wasn't there movie quote going around a few years ago by Jack Black, IIRC, to the effect of "I have a 12 inch penis...12 inches around" That was funny everytime I heard it. I smiled typing it out just now. Yes I have a maturity level of a 12 year old...and evidently a matching penis size. I could do this all night!

    75. Re:Reduced Friction? by umghhh · · Score: 1

      marriage is a transient state and trust you can only yourself so married or not you need indiacted phone urgently.

      Or did you mean thrust?

    76. Re:Reduced Friction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The official medical term for people like you is "parents."

      No it isn't.

      My ex-partner and I used this technique for 10 years without any resulting pregnancy. When we decided we were both ready, we did the deed and she got pregnant after the first try. What can I say? I'm a stud! =D

      Most people know nothing about sexual technique which is why most people get pregnant "accidently"...."yeah I accidently fucked this guy/girl"

      ffs people grow up and think about what you're doing.

      captcha: accurate

  6. i think this is the wrong path by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    people want to feel the juices

  7. Summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bill Gates is spending $100,000 to build a really small condom.

    1. Re:Summary by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      Nano condoms?

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    2. Re:Summary by biek · · Score: 2

      Condom nanotubes

    3. Re:Summary by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      "mmm" ... "yes, mmmmm!"

      "Eeeeek!" ... "Wassamatta???"

      GREY GOO!

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  8. Diamond Age anyone? by squidflakes · · Score: 2

    How long before we're hiring kids to go pick up nano pore condoms off the beach so we can recycle them in to materials to keep the nanobots off our lawns?

    Probably never, but I finally get to make the reference!

    1. Re:Diamond Age anyone? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      How long before we're hiring kids to go pick up nano pore condoms off the beach so we can recycle them in to materials to keep the nanobots off our lawns?

      Probably never, but I finally get to make the reference!

      It's probably because I just finished Snow Crash last week, but when I read the headline I envisioned the scene where dread pirate Bruce Lee is randomly inspecting his men's condoms prior to mass-buggering Hiro.

      I wonder how Neil Stephenson would feel if he knew that articles about scientific innovation in the field of fucking invoked thoughts of his writings...

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    2. Re:Diamond Age anyone? by jeffmeden · · Score: 2

      How long before we're hiring kids to go pick up nano pore condoms off the beach so we can recycle them in to materials to keep the nanobots off our lawns?

      Probably never, but I finally get to make the reference!

      It's probably because I just finished Snow Crash last week, but when I read the headline I envisioned the scene where dread pirate Bruce Lee is randomly inspecting his men's condoms prior to mass-buggering Hiro.

      I wonder how Neil Stephenson would feel if he knew that articles about scientific innovation in the field of fucking invoked thoughts of his writings...

      Not as bad as Neal Stephenson would feel (ducks)

    3. Re:Diamond Age anyone? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 2

      I wonder how Neil Stephenson would feel...

      Not as bad as Neal Stephenson would feel (ducks)

      You know the worst part? I bothered to spell check the last name.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  9. Possible simpler solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not just coat the existing ones in teflon?

    I'm guessing there's something obvious reason that's bad that I'd know if I wasn't a virgin?

    1. Re:Possible simpler solution by Ferrofluid · · Score: 1

      Teflon is not, to my knowledge, very elastic. It's essentially a rigid plastic. Condoms need to be able to stretch and experience, ahem, rather extreme dynamic loads during use. They need to be quite stretchy so that they don't tear.

  10. Latex by BringsApples · · Score: 1

    Hopefully superhydrophillic nanoparticles will not cause allergic reactions in some women, like latex does.

    --
    Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    1. Re:Latex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...or men for that matter.

    2. Re:Latex by BringsApples · · Score: 2
      Hell, I actually never knew that men could be allergic to condoms. I found this site: http://www.drweil.com/drw/u/id/QAA368178

      One interesting tidbit from that article:

      If you are affected, you can opt for polyurethane condoms, which protect against pregnancy just as well. Polyurethane is thin and strong and effectively conducts body heat and, according to some reports, is more compatible with sexual pleasure than latex.

      I've never heard of polyurethane condoms either. Hell if I didn't find them at Walgreens! ( http://www.walgreens.com/store/c/trojan-supra-lubricated-premium-polyurethane-condoms/ID=prod2303823-product )

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
  11. It looks like you need some help with condom ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It looks like you are you're need some condoms ? Would you like help ?
    * How to put it on ?
    * Just give it to me without help.

    1. Re:It looks like you need some help with condom ? by umghhh · · Score: 1

      in soviet Russia condoms wears you!

  12. 2 Birds 1 Stone.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If only this will stop loony Christians from using Windows.

  13. Wrong site? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought this was news for nerds?

    1. Re:Wrong site? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought this was news for nerds?

      wasn't that news to you?

  14. There needs to be a completely different approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The main problem with any kind of condom is the lack of intimacy... I'm not alone in that I would rather not have sex at all than to have to wear one. Maybe a better approach would be some kind of spray or something that would cut out the possibility of STD and/or pregnancy. Until there is something more radical than a new twist on an old nuisance, I can't imagine them becoming any more popular than they already are.

  15. I'll take ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... my nanotechnology in the extra large size.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  16. Two words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    micro + soft

    1. Re:Two words by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Followed by Blue Screen of Death....

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    2. Re:Two words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No fucking way! You'll be having the Red Scream of Death.

      Posting AC cause I've had the clap before......

  17. Wrong order of magnitude by Alopex · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't it be microtechnology for the micromen? Or is this some kind of confidence booster?

  18. time to disrupt the condom market! by larry+bagina · · Score: 0

    We don't need better condoms, we need better sex. I prefer bareback oral and anal. The problem is, a lot of people have no oral skills and think anal sex is dirty or gross. I'm glad shows like Glee and Two and a Half Men show anal sex as a positive thing, but it's not enough. Schools should encourage it and teach proper ass hygiene. There's no reason your ass should smell like, well, ass.

    As for oral, look at all the fatties! Clearly they enjoy putting things in their mouth, so they must get some pleasure from it. So suck a dick (or a clit).

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    1. Re:time to disrupt the condom market! by umghhh · · Score: 1
      As for quality of oral sex one has to think a bit and practice. Majority of us does not do either and of those that practice majority does not think. The result is that majority of ladies I did go to 'bed' with sucked at sucking. I did not try with men but judging on what the ladies say it must be the same.

      OT: when you gather some experience and do some thinking and then apply then you can see almost directly whether ladies in documentaries that we all so value do this right or just fake it to satisfy the moron director of the movie.

    2. Re:time to disrupt the condom market! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...Majority of us does not do either..."

      Where the hell do you live? I've only been with one woman in my life who wouldnt suck me, and Ive only heard of men who wont eat pussy on TV, Ive never encountered such ridiculous crap in real life

    3. Re:time to disrupt the condom market! by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      I think the 'either' that the grandparent was saying the majority of us do not do is 'think a bit' and 'practice'.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
  19. A nano condom... by freshlimesoda · · Score: 2

    for my size please. eeeehhhh....WTF!!!

    --
    I come to Slashdot only to read sigs. One you are reading is mine.
  20. Re:There needs to be a completely different approa by Overzeetop · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well, the pregnancy prevention part is pretty simple - outpatient surgery will fix you right up.

    Preventing microbe transfer when bodily fluids are mixed and parts are in direct contact - well, that's quite a bit more challenging without a physical barrier.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  21. Uhh... idle, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is this not in idle?

  22. Say... by fyngyrz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Using Nanotechnology To Build Thinner, Stronger Condoms

    Seems like a dick move to me.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    1. Re:Say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comment hijack detected.

    2. Re:Say... by Cryacin · · Score: 2

      Let's just hope it doesn't stay in the traditional windows behaviour of bluescreening right when you finish your download.

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    3. Re:Say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good one, was it hard to cum up with that one?

    4. Re:Say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How are phone & keyboard covers "dick moves?"

    5. Re:Say... by PC_THE_GREAT · · Score: 1

      Let's hope you don't end up having to do a ctrl alt del on that :p.
      http://www.google.com/patents/US20100086488

    6. Re: Say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I say build it, and they will cum.

  23. Sure darling... by bob_super · · Score: 1

    I AM wearing one. It's just the new Nanotech ones, that are so thin you can't see it!
    It's also super-micro-coated so it doesn't hurt regardless of what we do!
    You trust me, right?

    [In passing, condoms have been used for centuries. It's latex ones that are only a few decades old]

    1. Re:Sure darling... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      I think you mean polyurethane are a few decades old(invented in the 1990's). Latex are almost 100 years old(invented in 1920ish).

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:Sure darling... by u38cg · · Score: 1

      There are examples of condoms made of sheepskin, and other unpleasant things, much older than that.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
  24. Re:There needs to be a completely different approa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    my wife and i will start having sex without a condom and i'll only put it at the very end
    after ten years of marriage we only have 2 kids

  25. Obligatory Tom Swifty: by fyngyrz · · Score: 4, Funny

    I am not a homosexual necrophiliac, said Tom, in dead earnest.

    Thanks, try the veal.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    1. Re:Obligatory Tom Swifty: by JamieIanMacgregor · · Score: 2

      did you hear the other one about the homosexual necrophiliac? he was upset with his boyfriend, the rotten bum split on him.

  26. Re:There needs to be a completely different approa by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

    When I lived in Japan, one option was condom paint (for lack of a better phrase). Basically, you paint your hard-on with latex (?? or something like that) which dries out to form a skin-tight condom. There's also a baggie on the head to catch your swimmers. It wasn't as good as bareback, but it was certainly better than any condom. Oh, and the girl painting your pecker sticks her finger up your ass and sucks your balls to help keep you hard.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  27. Want to preserve sensation ? by dargaud · · Score: 0, Troll

    Then how about you start by NOT sexually mutilating hundreds of millions of baby boys in plenty of countries and religions. Barbaric.

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
    1. Re:Want to preserve sensation ? by Antipater · · Score: 2

      How about you not try to ignite a flame war on an unrelated story? This is about condoms, not circumcision. It's an issue for both cut and uncut men. Take your rant elsewhere, please.

      --
      Everything is better with chainsaws.
    2. Re:Want to preserve sensation ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pfft, they're just cutting off half the sensation.

  28. Real cowboys... by bradgoodman · · Score: 1

    Real cowboys ride bareback!

  29. Re:what's a condom? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    Because the greatest threat to the domination of Windows over the Known Universe is human beings, we need to prevent them from being born- or even conceived.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  30. Re:There needs to be a completely different approa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well of course she does. Goes without saying, really.

  31. Aaaaaaaaah! My dick! by stevegee58 · · Score: 1

    What could possibly go wrong?

  32. Star Trek Voyager by jeff13 · · Score: 1

    Really?

    Still not one Seven of Nine joke yet? Slashdoters, yer slipping.

  33. So basically by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they are into the anti-virus business right now.

  34. 99% less red balloons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    one possible outcome

  35. Custom condoms exist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    There already are different sizes condoms based on your measurements (96 available sizes). They-Fit is the brand and they have an on-line store (European company).

    I have tried them and they are pretty much spot on :-).
    Their largest size makes Magnum look like a condom for mice. And their smallest size goes to well veeery small.

    1. Re:Custom condoms exist by Antipater · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I've heard good things about TheyFit. The problem is they're not allowed to sell to/in the US (FDA regulations or some such thing; I didn't look at the details). Your average convenience store shelf (at least everywhere I've lived) has only standard and magnum. So I wish success upon TheyFit, and I hope other, similar companies start up, and I think Mr. Gate's money could have some weight in starting that.

      --
      Everything is better with chainsaws.
    2. Re:Custom condoms exist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They used to be available in the U.S. and were great. Does anybody know why they're not now?

    3. Re:Custom condoms exist by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      Their largest size makes Magnum look like a condom for mice.

      Ah yes, the "Splatterhorn" with liter capacity reservoir.

    4. Re:Custom condoms exist by stoploss · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I've heard good things about TheyFit. The problem is they're not allowed to sell to/in the US (FDA regulations or some such thing; I didn't look at the details). Your average convenience store shelf (at least everywhere I've lived) has only standard and magnum. So I wish success upon TheyFit, and I hope other, similar companies start up, and I think Mr. Gate's money could have some weight in starting that.
      --
      Everything is better with chainsaws.

      Just FYI, your sig is particularly disturbing in this context.

    5. Re:Custom condoms exist by Antipater · · Score: 1

      Ha! Just wait until I join a debate about circumcision!

      --
      Everything is better with chainsaws.
  36. News for Nerds??? by tekrat · · Score: 2

    A product that 99% of slashdotters will never get to use, despite the coolness of it being nano-technology. Then again, 99% of slashdotters don't get to use supercomputers either, but Slashdot reports on them. Maybe when we get sex robots, but then again you really don't need a condom for a machine unlikely to get pregnant.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:News for Nerds??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A product that 99% of slashdotters will never get to use, despite the coolness of it being nano-technology. Then again, 99% of slashdotters don't get to use supercomputers either, but Slashdot reports on them. Maybe when we get sex robots, but then again you really don't need a condom for a machine unlikely to get pregnant.

      Your just projecting your own world onto the rest of us. I've had lots of sex and I've use a few supercomputers. If you'd had both, you wouldn't be comparing them. Supercomputers are pretty boring. Submit job, wait, job finishes in 3 days instead of 3 years. I don't think I'll ever get bored with sex.

    2. Re:News for Nerds??? by forkazoo · · Score: 1

      Way easier to toss a condom than to clean a sex bot. Just sayin'.

  37. Creating problems to sell solutions by Stormwatch · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Douglas Adams said this back in '95:

    The idea that Bill Gates has appeared like a knight in shining armour to lead all his customers out of a mire of technological chaos neatly ignores the fact that it was he who by peddling second-hand, second-rate technology, led them all into it in the first place.

    Indeed, it still seems to be that Bill Gates' modus operandi is to create problems to sell solutions. His foundation promotes male genital mutilation (aka circumcision) as a solution to AIDS, even though real life numbers show it does not work at all. And a side effect of circumcision is that it severely reduces sexual sensation, which makes men even less inclined to use the actual solution, condoms (not to mention it increases the likelihood of erectile dysfunction, premature ejaculation, dyspareunia, and alexithymia).

    So his solution now is to make a high-tech super-thin condom. Which would not be necessary if his so-called charity didn't get men mutilated in the first place!

    1. Re:Creating problems to sell solutions by thegarbz · · Score: 0

      I can't believe this load of biased garbage is voted insightful. Genital mutilation? It wasn't mutilation when I got circumcised. It was a standard medical procedure needed for medical reasons which has several hygiene benefits too. You claims on sensation? [Citation required].

      As for the rest of you post there's no need for a citation there because it's a load of bull. Both the WHO and the CDC have conducted studies which show that the HIV transmission rates to men reduced if circumcised. The studies show it had no effect on transmission to women but guess what, it's kind of hard to pass on an infection you don't have so the women benefit long term too. Before you run out criticizing the gates foundation maybe you should start at the WHO who recommended in 2007 that the medical procedure be used in the prevention of AIDS.

      Now excuse me while I go mutilate my finger nails because they are getting too long.

    2. Re:Creating problems to sell solutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure if serious...

    3. Re:Creating problems to sell solutions by Stormwatch · · Score: 1, Troll

      It wasn't mutilation when I got circumcised.

      It was. You are a mutilated man, and so am I, only I am not in denial about it.

      It was a standard medical procedure needed for medical reasons which has several hygiene benefits too.

      Lobotomy used to be a standard medical procedure too. And insulin shock therapy. And trepanning. And radiated water. And mercury ingestion.

      [Citation required].

      Have some: about how circumcision reduces pleasure, and does not help prevent HIV at all.

    4. Re:Creating problems to sell solutions by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      I can't believe this load of biased garbage is voted insightful. Genital mutilation? It wasn't mutilation when I got circumcised. It was a standard medical procedure needed for medical reasons which has several hygiene benefits too. You claims on sensation? [Citation required].

      As for the rest of you post there's no need for a citation there because it's a load of bull. Both the WHO and the CDC have conducted studies which show that the HIV transmission rates to men reduced if circumcised. The studies show it had no effect on transmission to women but guess what, it's kind of hard to pass on an infection you don't have so the women benefit long term too. Before you run out criticizing the gates foundation maybe you should start at the WHO who recommended in 2007 that the medical procedure be used in the prevention of AIDS.

      Now excuse me while I go mutilate my finger nails because they are getting too long.

      I don't know where you live, but circumcision has moved from being SOP to a cosmetic surgery over the past 30 years in most places. In case of severe infection, the surgery is sometimes performed, just like a tonsilectome. In both circumstances, we're talking about a flap of skin that isn't really required anymore, but still provides benefits if it stays where it is. At one point, tonsilectomes were SOP too -- but they aren't anymore, despite the health benefits of having one.

      sensation link: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23374102

      Oh, and I'm fairly unbiased about the whole thing, as I see benefits to both sides and detriments to both. But it's best to be properly informed on BOTH sides of an argument before ranting.

    5. Re:Creating problems to sell solutions by ewieling · · Score: 1

      The decision to be circumcised (or not) should be made by the person when they are old enough to make the decision. It should *not* be decided for them by the parents or the doctor.

      --
      I really shouldn't have used someone else's email address for this account.
    6. Re:Creating problems to sell solutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And shaving your beard too...

    7. Re:Creating problems to sell solutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah same for whether you should have to go to school, or have vaccinations. All humans should be left in a isolation chambers until they are 18 and make all decisions for themselves as fully grown adults...

    8. Re:Creating problems to sell solutions by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Yes I'm a very mutilated man. I mutilated my mouth, I'm missing teeth. I'm about to get more genital mutilation, or at least have a hernia fixed. I suppose life threatening surgery is genital mutilation too?

      Or do you use the term mutilation only if you didn't know about it or consent to it happening, in which case not all circumcisions are. Mine was done for medical reasons, it was done when I was a teenager and it was done with consent. How is that mutilation again?

      Right. Circumstitions.com

      Thanks we can end our discussion right now. That is unless you have a citation even remotely reputable. I'll believe the WHO and the CDC over some quack on the internet thanks. Bye.

    9. Re:Creating problems to sell solutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None of those things remove body parts, mind you.

    10. Re:Creating problems to sell solutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't for the life of me figure out what you people's bitch is about circumcision. I was circumcised and my dick works and senses just fine. Now before you come back with "it could be better" two things: 1) I don't feel like I'm missing out with what I got and it feels great as it is. 2) You're circumcised by your own admission as well, so you don't have any idea how it could be better either. If your penis doesn't work good enough for you post circumcision, then the problem is you were born with a defective dick and you ARE in denial about that and searching for something to blame. That fact so many people get circumcisions and have zero complications is just further evidence that it is a safe and useful procedure. Do you seriously believe that if doctors, who study this kind of stuff, actually believed that circumcision made your dick inoperable, that they'd do it? A lot of them are men. If there was something out there that made sex better, doctors & businesses both would be scrambling to capitalize off of it. Your kind has an argument when the level of circumcision reaches the levels of mutilation, like the removing of clitorises that apparently they do over in Africa. That is immoral. Your everyday ordinary circumcision though is harmless though you'll claim otherwise. For every "study" you can provide a link for, I can provide 3 that's says your kind are idiots. You're on the same crazy train as Jenny McCarthy and her ilk. I hope that train runs right off a cliff!

    11. Re:Creating problems to sell solutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you had it done as a teenager, you likely had a lot less cut off than is the case with a typical infant circumcision, so be thankful for that.

      As to the rest, you neatly dismantled your own argument. Infant circumcisions are wrong precisely because they are done without consent and without any medical necessity. The vast majority of the world does not perform them, so you are full of shit if you claim they are ARE a medical necessity.

      If you want to have it done when older - that is fine. It is no different than any other body modification. But doing it to newborns is wrong. End of story.

    12. Re:Creating problems to sell solutions by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      You're circumcised by your own admission as well, so you don't have any idea how it could be better either.

      On the contrary! I know "before and after", if you catch my drift. I can tell you firsthand that circumcision severely decreases sexual pleasure. The "solution" turned out to be infinitely worse than the problem, which could have been fixed by more conservative means...

      That fact so many people get circumcisions and have zero complications is just further evidence that it is a safe and useful procedure.

      After you get circumcised, you have an incomplete penis with reduced sensitivity. Therefore, the complication rate is 100%, only the severity varies. Speaking of which, circumcision-related deaths are estimated at over a hundred per year in the USA alone, all swept under the rug.

      If there was something out there that made sex better, doctors & businesses both would be scrambling to capitalize off of it.

      On the contrary. Circumcisions are easy money for doctors. Not only the procedure itself, the tissue is sold to laboratories. The healthy thing to do is not performing circumcisions, but that is no easy money for anyone. Oh, here's a fun fact: the USA and Israel are about 5% of the world's population, yet they are about 50% of the world market for Viagra. Guess why.

      "Harmless", my shiny metal ass...

    13. Re:Creating problems to sell solutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't believe this load of biased garbage is voted insightful. Genital mutilation? It wasn't mutilation when I got circumcised. It was a standard medical procedure needed for medical reasons which has several hygiene benefits too. You claims on sensation? [Citation required].

      As for the rest of you post there's no need for a citation there because it's a load of bull. Both the WHO and the CDC have conducted studies which show that the HIV transmission rates to men reduced if circumcised. The studies show it had no effect on transmission to women but guess what, it's kind of hard to pass on an infection you don't have so the women benefit long term too. Before you run out criticizing the gates foundation maybe you should start at the WHO who recommended in 2007 that the medical procedure be used in the prevention of AIDS.

      Now excuse me while I go mutilate my finger nails because they are getting too long.

      Hygiene benefits? You ever heard of soap?

      Here's a study showing circumcision does decrease sensitivity: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23374102

      Plus it is very logical. The foreskin contains a ton of nerve endings, so if you remove the foreskin, then you are decreasing sensation.

      Regarding HIV, if you think it will prevent you from getting HIV, then I dare you to have unprotected sex with your circumcised penis with a stranger. No, the only 99% effective protection against HIV is a condom. Use a condom, and you don't need to be circumcised for "protection" against HIV. Another reason why the HIV/circumcision argument is bogus - because we could prevent a ton of cases of breast cancer by forcing mastectomies on young women, and we would NEVER think of doing that.

      Finally, comparing cutting your fingernails to circumcision is a kindergarten argument. Fingernails can grow back, foreskin cannot.

    14. Re:Creating problems to sell solutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't for the life of me figure out what you people's bitch is about circumcision. I was circumcised and my dick works and senses just fine. Now before you come back with "it could be better" two things: 1) I don't feel like I'm missing out with what I got and it feels great as it is. 2) You're circumcised by your own admission as well, so you don't have any idea how it could be better either. If your penis doesn't work good enough for you post circumcision, then the problem is you were born with a defective dick and you ARE in denial about that and searching for something to blame. That fact so many people get circumcisions and have zero complications is just further evidence that it is a safe and useful procedure. Do you seriously believe that if doctors, who study this kind of stuff, actually believed that circumcision made your dick inoperable, that they'd do it? A lot of them are men. If there was something out there that made sex better, doctors & businesses both would be scrambling to capitalize off of it. Your kind has an argument when the level of circumcision reaches the levels of mutilation, like the removing of clitorises that apparently they do over in Africa. That is immoral. Your everyday ordinary circumcision though is harmless though you'll claim otherwise. For every "study" you can provide a link for, I can provide 3 that's says your kind are idiots. You're on the same crazy train as Jenny McCarthy and her ilk. I hope that train runs right off a cliff!

      You don't know what you're missing, just like a blind man doesn't know what he can't see. You are in denial because you don't want to admit your parents did something wrong to you.

      Doctors DO make money off the procedure, and since circumcision has been proven to increase a person's chances of getting ED, then the drug companies make a ton of money off Viagra, etc.

      The fact that you are calling people "idiots" means you know you lost the argument and have to resort to personal attacks.

    15. Re:Creating problems to sell solutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None of those things remove body parts, mind you.

      +1000

    16. Re:Creating problems to sell solutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... circumcision severely decreases sexual pleasure ...

      Then you obviously didn't have phimosis (where the foreskin squeezes like a condom). I did and circumcision did increase sexual pleasure.

      ... 50% of the world market for Viagra ...

      The main purpose of viagra is to stop a limp dick. So with the USA at least I could say: Because they're less healthy. Because they're obsessed with having what the 'other man' gets. Because a repressed society spends more time compensating for its inadequacies.

    17. Re:Creating problems to sell solutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... when they are old enough ...

      Unfortunately penile surgery is much, much easier on an in elastic penis: One that doesn't get bigger when sexually aroused. That means performing circumcision on boys in the 10-14 years age bracket at the latest. Unfortunately, at that age a boy won't know if his foreskin will affect his sexual response. It's not as is a boy can see how a healthy foreskin performs during intercourse. Worse, what is a minor problem with the foreskin at age 14 can be painful by age 30.

    18. Re:Creating problems to sell solutions by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      The proper treatments for phimosis are steroid creams or prepuceplasty. If doctors had anything other than greed in their minds, circumcision would be left as a desperate last resort, not the duck tape of penile problems.

    19. Re:Creating problems to sell solutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume your foreskin doesn't grow back like your nails do. Saying circumcision is comparable to cutting your nails (or your hair) is a bit disingenious.

  38. Biodegradable by ugen · · Score: 2

    While they are at it, could they please make condoms biodegradable. After plastic bags, condoms are probably one of the worst culprits in terms of emitting plastic into the ocean and nature (unlike plastic bags, condoms are often flushed down the toilet).

    1. Re:Biodegradable by rahvin112 · · Score: 2

      Latex, being a biological product does biodegade, it just does so slowly.

      Rubber, produced from petroleum, is not biodegradable.

      Most condoms are latex.

    2. Re:Biodegradable by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 2

      Latex, being a biological product does biodegade, it just does so slowly.

      Rubber, produced from petroleum, is not biodegradable.

      Most condoms are latex.

      Actually, rubber comes from the rubber tree -- and vulcanized rubber isn't very biodegradable as it has been chemically altered. Latex is just a product name for the type of rubber extracted from a particular rubber tree. Unvulcanized rubber is biodegradable, but is also prone to tears, so most rubber is vulcanized. You probably wouldn't want a non-vulcanized condom.

      Petroleum-based alternatives are things like polyeurethane, which is a less-popular alternative to Latex.

  39. Mr. Gates by tekrat · · Score: 1

    If history has shown us anything, based on experiences from Microsoft products, Mr. Gates' condoms will come in only one size -- Mr. Gates' size. And you'd better be happy with that.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:Mr. Gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Micro. Soft.

      Says it all, really...

    2. Re:Mr. Gates by Zynder · · Score: 2

      640 micrometers should be enough for anyone!

  40. Sizes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, but will they finally make them in sizes that make sense? According to the FDA and condom industry (they blame each other), there isn't an issue, but all condoms are sized for men with a thin long penis. Even the magnum condoms aren't much wider, just longer. Not every penis is the same size. Even "custom" condoms are often far too long (like 18 inches at large widths!), even if they are the right width.

  41. Re:There needs to be a completely different approa by hondo77 · · Score: 1

    The first and only time I did that, we ended up with twins. Seriously.

    --
    I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
  42. Dupe! by hawkfish · · Score: 2

    Isn't this what the "wearable computing" poll was all about?

    --
    You will not drink with us, but you would taste our steel? - Walter Matthau, The Pirates
  43. Re:There needs to be a completely different approa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Which is perplexing because you're infertile...

  44. Nanocondoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heh heh heh

  45. Now, Bill go talk to the Pope and US teens by DaveyJJ · · Score: 2

    Bill Gates should use some of that clout of his to actually so some good re: condoms.

    First, get on the phone and blast that mysogynistic virgin running the Catholic Church and make him promote condom use, especially in Africa. Then get US teens some proper, frank, honest and mandatory sex ed classes with all the gory details so that you combat the US having the highest rate of teen pregnancy in the industrialized world, according the the Center for Disease Control, who notes that 30% of women below age 20 get pregnant in the US. If those happen, then he can claim to be doing some good re: sex and condoms.

    --
    DaveyJJ
  46. Re:what's a condom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    You put it on your dongle to practice safe hex.

  47. Superhero by GlobalEcho · · Score: 1

    I sense a superhero origin story in this. Part-human, part-nanobot.

  48. I thought the dogma was don't use condoms by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    After all, we tell our students these days that condoms are less than 50% effective. Why bother making a better one when we're telling people not to use them?

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  49. Wrong site by superdave80 · · Score: 1

    This article will probably only be applicable to about .01% of the users of this website...

  50. $100000 is only 200 girls in Back Bay Boston by Simonetta · · Score: 1

    $100,000 is only 200 girl/hours in Back Bay Boston. Are you sure that that is enough research? It would probably buy more research in Africa, but you better be sure that they work before you do any advanced research there.

        Speaking from one girl to another, are you sure that all your gentleman callers actually know that the lube goes on the !inside! of the condom? And that if they are using gelatin based lube like KY that they need to add 3-4 drops of water to a toothbrush-sized dab of KY to make sure that his fully-erect penis will glide between the lube layer and the condom side?

        Girlfriend, this is when you start 'training' the boy, i.e. getting him fully erect and in your vagina and keeping himself in a state where he is just balancing on the edge of ejacuation, but still being ~just able to keep it from blasting off.

    1. Re:$100000 is only 200 girls in Back Bay Boston by vakuona · · Score: 1

      I like how people think that Africans only disobey the Pope when it comes to condom use, but not when it comes to the actual having of sex.

      Seriously! The reason that condoms are not used as much in Africa have to do with the fact that the people are so poor they generally can't afford them. That, and Africa is nominally a very conservative place (when it comes to sex) which means people are just not too likely to go buying them, especially if they are very poor and live in communities where all the shopkeepers know them, and word can get around if a boy is a bit of a dog (for lack of a better word) and the shame (and physical danger) that might result.

      Oh, and they lack education.

      What is the excuse in America? (And in the UK I might ask too, which has the highest teen pregnancy rate in western Europe)

    2. Re:$100000 is only 200 girls in Back Bay Boston by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, yes. We all know poor people can't afford to do anything other than fuck because it is free. But please, if Africa is such a "conservative" place, then why such a large percentage of AIDS cases? Obviously someone is fucking a whole lot of people whether voluntarily or involuntarily. Sure, you'll have to throw in a few needle junkies and the odd contaminated blood transfusion but overall sex spreads the disease the most. Stop having sex (unlikely) or wrap your junk and you'll see the AIDS infection rate drop to something more in line with the first world nations. You are right about education though. It would solve many of the problems in Africa. For whatever reason though, Africans evidently hate school because when solutions to their problems arrive from other places that have already solved them, they reject them.

  51. Superhydrophyllic?? by CCarrot · · Score: 1

    The nanotechnology that the Boston doctors intend to use for their improved condoms will be superhydrophillic nanoparticles that coat the condom and trap water to make them more resilient and easier to use.

    Umm...am I the only one that envisioned an instant Slim Jim after putting one of these puppies on?

    Also, if these things are 'trapping water', won't they, erm, 'swell' with use? Where does the trapped water go?

    "Mmmm...leathery...and yet strangely rubbery at the same time!"

    --
    "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
  52. Nano condoms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How well do they think they are going to sell nano condoms???

    They already failed to sell "small, medium, large" because everybody picked large. They renamed them large, huge and enormous and all of a sudden sales matched expected demographics of sizes. Looks like people didn't want to pick up a package saying "small".

    Ok, nano doesn't apply to the size, but try to convince the average user that. It is an uphill PR journey and it is steep.

  53. better headline by Tom · · Score: 1

    Company with failed product tries to save itself by releasing more of the same

    MS has missed the bandwagon, once again, but unlike the other big blunders (*cough* Internet *cough*), this time there are powerful and more importantly, wealthy, competitors around to take advantage of it.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    1. Re:better headline by Tom · · Score: 1

      lol, wrong article. I don't think that's ever happened to me in... uh... almost 20 years of /. ?

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  54. Not to be too crude, but... by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

    I think what would really sell are condoms for women who don't like to give give blowjobs, such that:
    - It was acceptable for a (condom-wearing) man to ejaculate in her mouth, and
    - It was a worthwhile experience for the man.

    If that problem could be solved by a condom design, sales would go through the roof, especially for married couples.

  55. Not a proper sentence. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    'We believe that by altering the mechanical forces experienced by the condom, we may ultimately be able to make a thinner condom which reduces friction, thereby reducing discomfort associated with friction increases pleasure, thereby increasing condom use and decreases rates of unwanted pregnancy and infection transmission.'"

    Run on sentence, and not taken from the link inside the quote.

    Pickens, you're a hack.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  56. Re:There needs to be a completely different approa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    where the hell do you get that?? havent seen that at any kusuri ever. or is it a soapland kind of thing?

  57. in Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Multiple sizes come in condoms! ....I'll get my coat....

    1. Re:in Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      damn. meant to mod funny, and missed by one. Posting to undo

  58. In the days of old when knights were bold, by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

    and rubbers weren't invented.
    they tied a sock around their cock,
    and babies were prevented.

    If it was good enough for my great, great, great, great, great, great, great, granddad, it's good enough for me.

    1. Re:In the days of old when knights were bold, by Storebj0rn · · Score: 1

      and rubbers weren't invented. they tied a sock around their cock, and babies were prevented.

      If it was good enough for my great, great, great, great, great, great, great, granddad, it's good enough for me.

      it wasn't. If it was, you would not be here.

      --
      "Windows are for cheaters" - Bruce Springsteen
  59. New "Zed" from Trojan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uses two super-thin nanofilm condoms to generate zero point energy for her pleasure.

  60. condom on my dreams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MsyMF-mEpjQ

  61. Re:There needs to be a completely different approa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, and the girl painting your pecker sticks her finger up your ass and sucks your balls to help keep you hard.

    So does she come standard with the tin of latex paint, or is she an optional extra?

  62. The worlds thinnest condom is 0.01 millimeters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sagami Rubber Industries in Japan makes the worlds thinnest condoms, just 0.01 millimeters thick. Human hair is 6 times thicker being 0.06 mm thick.

    http://kotaku.com/the-worlds-thinnest-condoms-are-the-pinnacle-of-japane-1477798042

  63. New and improved! by msobkow · · Score: 1

    The Micro Soft condom: snugger and with a built-in Viagra(tm) coating... :P

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  64. this is about exposure by Goldsmith · · Score: 1

    This is a training project for some medical residents which has been repackaged into a press release. As a training and exposure project, it's great, BUSM is going to learn a bunch. Maybe they'll publish something, but don't expect anything else.

    As a vehicle to get Gates Foundation and University of Manchester a bunch of press, it's ... ugh, disappointing. This is what they want to spend their money and prestige on?

    $100k isn't close to realistic for a real applied nanomaterial R&D project. Running a real materials research project with medical residents would be silly.

    If they really wanted to make a better condom, they would fund a materials company.

  65. I was expecting more jokes... by iamnotasmurf · · Score: 0

    So I will make one up right now. What creates and destroys a life at the same time? A broken condom!

    --
    My sig has no nature
  66. Quote by CHIT2ME · · Score: 0

    I guess this is why Mork from Ork kept saying......."Nano nano"!!!

    --
    My karma is bad. Don't get too close!!!
  67. phuck u by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate you Citation Needed people so much. Is there NOTHING you won't demand a citation for?

    1. Re:phuck u by Immerman · · Score: 2

      >I hate you Citation Needed people so much.

      independent citation needed

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    2. Re:phuck u by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there NOTHING you won't demand a citation for?

      Speeding.

  68. You Like Money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like money too!

    The world's greatest scientific minds,
    can't stop thinking about sex?

    However, I do remember a report on how nanoparticals are highly toxic to live cells.

  69. Small by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The last thing I want down there is anything measured in billionths of a meter.

  70. Since we're on the subject: Fuck you DICE. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't fuck around, I don't fuck people up the ass and I don't get fucked myself and I don't give
    a fuck about BIlly-bub and his filthy whore Melinda, I don't get fucked with vaccines, fucking food
    additives, fucking artifical sweeteners or get fucking vitamin deficiencies and I don't watch
    your fucking filth on TV no do I believe in fucking global warming lies, so fuck you DICE.

    What the FUCK does this have to do with "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"

    What the FUCK does it even remotely have to do with "interesting" ??

  71. Re:There needs to be a completely different approa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please Sir, clean my monitor now

  72. Better survival bare kit water storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On a serious note (if someone mods it as funny), the condoms can hold about 2L of water IIRC if you babied it in a cloth sack or sock.

    With the new improvements if is good news if you needed more reliability to carry life saving water if that is all you had.

  73. Do not want yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is going to need a lot of testing. Might consider it after 5-10 years of it on the market.
    Don't know that I'd want nano-anything near something that important.
    There was apparently a news item about someone who wore shorts made of some new utlra-fabric as a bathing suit. It's a new fabric that came on the market for pants a couple years ago.
    Anyway, it shrinks significantly when wet which I discovered once, but this guy who wore it when swimming ended up getting his penis cut off. At least it was known to other people I talked to about it, in Japan.
    FWIW I also tried microthin 0.001 condoms and they hurt. So I don't think ultra thin condoms with nano dust on them is anything I want to try, and I'm regular sized.
    Otherwise sounds good, but let someone else beta test them.

  74. News Headline by TheDarkener · · Score: 1

    HEADLINE: "Bill Gates is giving $100,000 toward making a new kind of 'nanoparticle' condom. It is touted as being more secure, more fun and more sensitive than the current type of condoms in use today. "

    Wait for it......waaaiiiit fooooor iiiiiit........ BUT THAT ISN'T THE FIRST TIME HE'S PROMISED MORE SECURITY FUN AND PERFORMANCE IN ONE OF HIS INVENTIONS...HA! *drumfill*

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  75. Multiple contenders for Next Generation Condom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has put out a challenge for developing the Next Generation Condom.
    This is not the only contender, by far, to get support from the foundation.

    The more interesting contender (also with support from the BMG foundation) in my eyes are Origami Condoms: http://www.origamicondoms.com/
    They're probably going to be expensive, but they promise to address a lot of the shortcomings of current condoms.

    1. Re:Multiple contenders for Next Generation Condom by ketomax · · Score: 1

      they promise to address a lot of the shortcomings of current condoms

      Won't come off, like ever!

  76. Re:There needs to be a completely different approa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You probably are pretty alone in that.

  77. Re:There needs to be a completely different approa by moonflower1 · · Score: 1

    But a vasectomy is pretty much permanent. Don't you think that a temporal prevention of pregnancy also warrants some merit?

  78. I recently found one that I really like ... by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    Nice one. Neatly shaped, sits snug and improved sensation. ... Yet sometimes I don't want to much sensation, so I can stay in the game longer.
    I often also use two. Had 2 breakages and one loss in the past. Nasty and scary that is. (queue condom usage stories below please :-) )

    Conclusion: Improvements in Condoms is not the worst thing for the super-rich to invest in.

    My 2 cents.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  79. Finally by PsyMan · · Score: 0

    Finally a practical use for Graphene? (aside from speedo's of course)

  80. Bark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bill Gate's is soooo old, his first condom was made out of bark.

  81. Nanocondom by MXB2001 · · Score: 0

    Had to be said (or resaid).

    --
    01/01/01