Until you realize that the children most in need of fully-funded public education come from families who, even with the voucher grants, can't afford to send the children to "proper" schools.
Hmm... I thought the vouchers paid for the entire cost of education. I guess I can see how that would be a problem if it doesn't. Yeah, you're probably right. Thanks for the info.
Recall that recently, certain charges were dropped against Massoui because a commercial airliner was not specifically mentioned as a 'means of transportation' in the applicable federal law.
So what? We don't need to charge him with breaking 950,000 different laws. If he was getting away with something without having any law apply, then you might have a point.
For instance, a man can punch a pregnant woman in the stomach repeatedly, causing her to have a miscarriage, and the worst crime he can be charged with in many states is simple assault.
That murder is usually a State, not Federal, matter. In the case of a hacker, who may be operating across State lines, it is proper for the Federal Government to get involved.
If you kill someone across state lines, you can be charged federally with murder or negligent homicide or whatever.
And vouchers are the death of public education. It pains me to see you care more about inanimate objects than the growing disenfranchisement of the low-income working class.
Huh? How does a voucher system contribute to the disenfranchisement of the low-income working class? Are you SERIOUS?
Tell that to the loser... I bet his feelings are hurt. And what about the robot? Prove to me that robots can't feel pain and then maybe I'll agree with you.
Teaching violence and destruction to our nation's youth in order to increase the corporate revenues of Comedy Central. Thank God vouchers were deemed constitutional.
Teaching violence and destruction to our nation's youth in order to increase the corporate revenues of Comedy Central. Thank God vouchers were deemed constitutional.
It's very easy to eliminate false positives. You do a search on the P2P network for songs whose copyright you own. Then you download that song, and check that it is "yours". Whatever IP address you made the TCP connection to is breaking the law.
As an efficiency step, you can save the checksums of the verified songs which are yours.
Mine says I "may not connect more than 5 computers at a single location" and that I can't "resell the Service or any portion thereof," but it doesn't say anything about giving it away for free (assuming fewer than 5 computers at a time are connected).
Telocity is great. I have nothing bad to say about them.
Doesn't anyone have concerns about Nintendo collecting information on how good of a game player they are? Sure, you say, you might have nothing to hide, but what about others that do?
We all know that reverse engineering without the permission of the copyright holder is a violation of the DMCA, and doing so "willfully and for purposes of commercial advantage or private financial gain," such as to win a contest like this one is a criminal offense. Since it's a criminal offense, the victim (the copyright holder) doesn't even have to step up and admit that s/he's the copyright holder.
Slashdot Mirror
Prove it.
What's described here is not what I signed up for.
Yeah but the ability to change the rules in the middle of the game was there when you signed up.
Until you realize that the children most in need of fully-funded public education come from families who, even with the voucher grants, can't afford to send the children to "proper" schools.
Hmm... I thought the vouchers paid for the entire cost of education. I guess I can see how that would be a problem if it doesn't. Yeah, you're probably right. Thanks for the info.
When does Slashdot release an API to their website?
"House OKs Life Sentences For Hackers"
Is slashdot using that terminology too now? I guess it's now OK.
Recall that recently, certain charges were dropped against Massoui because a commercial airliner was not specifically mentioned as a 'means of transportation' in the applicable federal law.
So what? We don't need to charge him with breaking 950,000 different laws. If he was getting away with something without having any law apply, then you might have a point.
For instance, a man can punch a pregnant woman in the stomach repeatedly, causing her to have a miscarriage, and the worst crime he can be charged with in many states is simple assault.
That murder is usually a State, not Federal, matter. In the case of a hacker, who may be operating across State lines, it is proper for the Federal Government to get involved.
If you kill someone across state lines, you can be charged federally with murder or negligent homicide or whatever.
I want to know which of those yellow page entries are paid for, damnit!
And vouchers are the death of public education. It pains me to see you care more about inanimate objects than the growing disenfranchisement of the low-income working class.
Huh? How does a voucher system contribute to the disenfranchisement of the low-income working class? Are you SERIOUS?
Tell that to the loser... I bet his feelings are hurt. And what about the robot? Prove to me that robots can't feel pain and then maybe I'll agree with you.
Teaching violence and destruction to our nation's youth in order to increase the corporate revenues of Comedy Central. Thank God vouchers were deemed constitutional.
Teaching violence and destruction to our nation's youth in order to increase the corporate revenues of Comedy Central. Thank God vouchers were deemed constitutional.
~s/song/movie/g
It's very easy to eliminate false positives. You do a search on the P2P network for songs whose copyright you own. Then you download that song, and check that it is "yours". Whatever IP address you made the TCP connection to is breaking the law.
As an efficiency step, you can save the checksums of the verified songs which are yours.
If you feel inclined to share, what kind of message would you leave to the future children of Earth?
Don't blame me, I voted for Nader.
What is Slashdot's policy?
Mine says I "may not connect more than 5 computers at a single location" and that I can't "resell the Service or any portion thereof," but it doesn't say anything about giving it away for free (assuming fewer than 5 computers at a time are connected).
Telocity is great. I have nothing bad to say about them.
Wonder if others will see this as a way of making money out of beating censorship?
Here's a list of some companies making money out of beating censorship.
Plus, it is already outside of the store, so a quick get-a-way is much easier.
Yeah, but it's all attached to the kid and everything. Why not just steal some old ladies purse and then you can buy whatever you want?
How long until some kids beat this guys ass and take the game?
Why not just steal the games from the store he's out in front of? Seems a lot easier.
Doesn't anyone have concerns about Nintendo collecting information on how good of a game player they are? Sure, you say, you might have nothing to hide, but what about others that do?
Yes, but it doesn't bitch about people not making cross-browser sites.
Fix the page widening bug in slashdot then get back to us about not creating cross-browser compliant sites.
We all know that reverse engineering without the permission of the copyright holder is a violation of the DMCA, and doing so "willfully and for purposes of commercial advantage or private financial gain," such as to win a contest like this one is a criminal offense. Since it's a criminal offense, the victim (the copyright holder) doesn't even have to step up and admit that s/he's the copyright holder.
Sounds like a good test case.
The broadcast flag is used as information stating that the program may not be redistributed.
As long as they only turn on the flag during the commercials, sounds like a great idea!