I would come in during the busiest part of
the night(I was on call you see)and walk in the
back. The orientals(it was a steakhouse())all
smiled and said HI, and pointed to a bowl of
cold rice and some greasy chicken fung strips
and peppers they had saved for me.
I would walk over to the old broken down
crapmatic dishwasher they used and get to
work on the pile of dishes that was overflowing into the hall.
About 10:30 in the evening, after the last of
the cooking utensils were washed, and there was
no more hot water, I would go out and play
dollar poker with the nings and hans with my
share of the tip and drink $0.50 beer.
I find that network administration is worse
than that, so I say I have 25 years experience
and I still don't like prodigal 14 year olds
who never washed a dish in their lives.
I would argue that your concept of value is
built on notional concepts.
The structure you refer to is largely an interpreted approach to the subject. The only
way to know whether it will help you
is to test it.
You know how to test it right?
I always thought that info security was about keeping the network reasonably safe from people who worried about risk management and cost/benefit analysis.
I really enjoyed your digression into the psyche
of the wounded tech geek cum ubermensch.
Have you considered a paper on this topic doctor?
As it is I'm just glad I don't have to work around you.
You are sooo right on about dell.
I support three computer labs of crappy dell stuff.
The optiplex gx110{desktop profile case) has a "feature" that causes any movement to a monitor sited upon the chassis, or movement of the
chassis itself to potentially jam the floppy
load assembly. You have to remove and reseat the case when this happens. A classroom of malicious HS monkeys catch on to stuff like this pretty quickly.
Dell desktop support: Those F**ckers. If I ever catch one of those checklist clicking bast****
I will skull**** them to death.
As far as performance goes:who cares from where I'm at..if the machines were all 486's I'd be happier.
Your smoking crack and there are
plenty 'o bipartisan benchmark tests that
prove it. Just do a google search.
As far as smoking the athlon->nothing smokes better than the athlon:
MY room doesn't need no stinking heaters...
I just think of the crappy switching layout and think to myself:
Think: set think! [
I am glad I'm drunk because ordinarily a bunch of clustered dual processor equipped machines equivocating on the nearest VC makes me ill, But
chemically now, I THINK IT IS PURE ZEN.
]
Yep up and going in tomorrow.
Now lets see..
Kernel 2.2.14 to 2.2.20, antivir for mail,
2.4.4 to 2.4.14 for webserver, glibc globbing
sploit to patch for every *nix box:dsrepair and maintenance for the novell farm.
It was a fun holiday while it lasted....
It's just security through obscurity again, ad nauseam.
It's enough that MS wants to be left
alone to do things the MS way. They make no
real secret about wanting a,secure, all MS
enabled.net.
I'm moderate enough to say that if they would
like this then as long as there is no attempt to
cut users off from the "public" network and MS
pays for the BW and infrastructure it desires
then MS users should have their little hidey
hole provided by MS. Because, it seems very
apparent to me now that MS products are becoming
"unsafe at any speed."
"A single, simple flaw..."
Another remotely exploitable "feature" I'd call
it. Granted nothings perfect, but MS has been
incredibly non-perfect recently.
When you have a bundled browser that has severe
issues with content id and handling, "dumb"
users, and this newest krampf, it is really
time that ms got spanked.
If you read the linux journal article you will
see that SIS is an early adopter of this idea.
Which is interesting considering that my
sis 630 chipset equipped mobo doesn't
behave well , or at all, with X.
Slashdot Mirror
I was a PT dishwasher once. It was a joke.
I would come in during the busiest part of
the night(I was on call you see)and walk in the
back. The orientals(it was a steakhouse())all
smiled and said HI, and pointed to a bowl of
cold rice and some greasy chicken fung strips
and peppers they had saved for me.
I would walk over to the old broken down
crapmatic dishwasher they used and get to
work on the pile of dishes that was overflowing into the hall.
About 10:30 in the evening, after the last of
the cooking utensils were washed, and there was
no more hot water, I would go out and play
dollar poker with the nings and hans with my
share of the tip and drink $0.50 beer.
I find that network administration is worse
than that, so I say I have 25 years experience
and I still don't like prodigal 14 year olds
who never washed a dish in their lives.
YAY bsd. Boo linux. Paraphrased prepost.
Did they generate a nice default key for BD users or do they insist you have to gen your own? minorityspeak: I hate ssh. Thank god for deslogin.
Huh?
I would argue that your concept of value is built on notional concepts. The structure you refer to is largely an interpreted approach to the subject. The only way to know whether it will help you is to test it. You know how to test it right?
I always thought that info security was about keeping the network reasonably safe from people who worried about risk management and cost/benefit analysis.
I really enjoyed your digression into the psyche of the wounded tech geek cum ubermensch. Have you considered a paper on this topic doctor? As it is I'm just glad I don't have to work around you.
You are sooo right on about dell. I support three computer labs of crappy dell stuff. The optiplex gx110{desktop profile case) has a "feature" that causes any movement to a monitor sited upon the chassis, or movement of the chassis itself to potentially jam the floppy load assembly. You have to remove and reseat the case when this happens. A classroom of malicious HS monkeys catch on to stuff like this pretty quickly. Dell desktop support: Those F**ckers. If I ever catch one of those checklist clicking bast**** I will skull**** them to death. As far as performance goes:who cares from where I'm at..if the machines were all 486's I'd be happier.
Nice signature. Very interesting.
Wow, this was too much to handle, I'm still cleaning up from laughtermath.
Your smoking crack and there are plenty 'o bipartisan benchmark tests that prove it. Just do a google search. As far as smoking the athlon->nothing smokes better than the athlon: MY room doesn't need no stinking heaters...
I just think of the crappy switching layout and think to myself: Think: set think! [ I am glad I'm drunk because ordinarily a bunch of clustered dual processor equipped machines equivocating on the nearest VC makes me ill, But chemically now, I THINK IT IS PURE ZEN. ]
Yep up and going in tomorrow. Now lets see.. Kernel 2.2.14 to 2.2.20, antivir for mail, 2.4.4 to 2.4.14 for webserver, glibc globbing sploit to patch for every *nix box :dsrepair and maintenance for the novell farm.
It was a fun holiday while it lasted....
It's just security through obscurity again, ad nauseam. It's enough that MS wants to be left alone to do things the MS way. They make no real secret about wanting a ,secure, all MS
enabled .net.
I'm moderate enough to say that if they would
like this then as long as there is no attempt to
cut users off from the "public" network and MS
pays for the BW and infrastructure it desires
then MS users should have their little hidey
hole provided by MS. Because, it seems very
apparent to me now that MS products are becoming
"unsafe at any speed."
"A single, simple flaw..." Another remotely exploitable "feature" I'd call it. Granted nothings perfect, but MS has been incredibly non-perfect recently. When you have a bundled browser that has severe issues with content id and handling, "dumb" users, and this newest krampf, it is really time that ms got spanked.
If you read the linux journal article you will see that SIS is an early adopter of this idea. Which is interesting considering that my sis 630 chipset equipped mobo doesn't behave well , or at all, with X.