Slashdot Mirror


User: Tackhead

Tackhead's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
6,382
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 6,382

  1. Other passwords of note. on Bad Password Allowed Swedish Watergate · · Score: 5, Funny
    President Scroob: 12345
    President Nixon: iam!acrook
    President Clinton I: hopemyhusbanddoesntfindoutaboutthepassword
    President Bush I: anybodybutmysons
    President Clinton II: wishmyhusbandtoldmemonicawasbi8yearsago
    President Bush II: 12345
    President Quayle I: potatoe

    Don't blame me for that last one. My password was "colbertstewart2012".

  2. Re:More junk to monitor on Space Tourism, Now and to Come · · Score: 4, Interesting
    > Government contractors worry me enough, but what happens to a space hotel when the business runs out of money? I can see this going through a boom and bust cycle like just about every new business, and I want to know. It's not like running lots of fiber optic cable and then going bankrupt. Who's going to take care of the degrading orbit of the hotel?

    Gravity.

    Interesting economic question: What's the salvage value of an abandoned ISS? If it costs $10000/lb to send something to orbit, the ISS is worth its weight in gold.

    But if you buy an abandoned space station for $1.00, and use its $10000/lb "value" to finance the building of rockets that cost $1000/lb to send fuel into orbit before your space station's orbit degrades, you've just cut the value of an abandoned hunk of metal by a factor of ten. Oops, those were also your company's assets! The bank calls your loan, and you're sunk.

    Then some other guy buys you out for pennies on the dollar, and flies your $1000/lb rockets to his space hotel, and makes a go of it.

    I suspect that much like wiring a nation with fiberoptics, the early bird gets the worm... but the second mouse gets the cheese.

  3. Re:That's A Rather Inconvenient Truth. on Another 150,000 Years of CO2 Data · · Score: 1
    > > No, you can't have another planet. Learn to take care of the one you got first.
    > > I'll turn this rocket right around!
    >
    > And the triple-breasted hookers are just icing on the cake!

    In fact, forget the rocket. And the planet. Aaw, screw the whole thing!
    - Zaphod Benderbrox

  4. Re:That's A Rather Inconvenient Truth. on Another 150,000 Years of CO2 Data · · Score: 5, Insightful
    > You can "colonize" Mars all you want. Without precious foodstuffs and volatiles from Earth, what are you going to eat when Sol 3 goes under?

    Seeing as how Mars' atmosphere has a lot of CO2 in it, and photosynthetic organisms do pretty well in such an environment, I'll probably eat a lot of green leafy things.

    And since Mars doesn't appear to have a history of complex life, it's exceedingly unlikely that there's any coal or oil there.

    And since there's not much oxygen there (on account of there being not much in the way of plant life at present), a gasoline powered engine is gonna be pretty useless.

    Rest easy, secure in the knowledge that future Martians will never despoil their environment by using fossil fuels!

  5. Re:Touching hundreds of millions of lives... on Windows Vista RC1 Complete · · Score: 1
    > I miss that album so much. Somehow, I lost it. But I've got the LP cover with that scene from Alien still in my basement. I don't know why I haven't thrown it away, other than that it reminds me of my teen years when I bought it. Fucking weird shit. But good. :)

    ...just don't scan in the album cover and use it as your boot logo on a laptop that you have to carry through an airport. Heh.

    Keith LeBlanc and the rest of the gang are all still very active in the music scene. Most of the late-80s/early-90s stuff can still be found on CD, even if you have to get it used.

    (In case anyone's wondering, I have no relation the Tackhead, I'm just another rabid fan. The thread was spawned due to a reference to the fact that the band sampled in some quotes from Frontline (or NOVA, or 60 minutes?) documentary about military contractors during the Reagan years, which dovetailed nicely with the way Windows Vista's development has gone...

    "Well, we can kill companies, and destroy chairs, in the name of the shareholders..." ("Oh my God, we can't say that!") "Yeah, but that's what we do!" "And if you don't want that done, don't install Microsoft! Don't install a Microsoft OS and then wring your hands and say 'oh my God, it's got DRM, it phones home just like spyware'... well of course it does. Because that's what you installed our software to do."

  6. Re:Touching hundreds of millions of lives... on Windows Vista RC1 Complete · · Score: 1
    > what
    > what
    > what
    > what
    > what's my mission now?

    Now what?

    "One controversial operating system is Windows Vista. Critics charge that it's a perfect example of goldplating, in which the manufacturer tries to load every conceivable feature into the operating system, ignoring actual IT staff needs..."

    I wonder what Steve Ballmer's rants would sound like if into Mind at the End of the Tether?

  7. Touching hundreds of millions of lives... on Windows Vista RC1 Complete · · Score: 5, Funny
    > Windows Vista is going to touch hundreds of millions of lives all around the world.

    "Bad touch! Bad touch!"

  8. Nil ubi sub ubi. on Assassins, Bullies, and Messiahs · · Score: 1
    > Semper ubi sub ubi is a pun based on the English gloss of a malformed Latin phrase: "always where under where." The motto is used as a joke by Latin students and others to mean "always wear underwear."

    Nil ubi sub ubi would be more appropriate for a Rockstar game. After all, the game also has a "Hot Coffee" rap video. Goes something like magnae clunes mihi placent, nec possum de hac re mentiri. (Large buttocks are pleasing to me, nor am I able to lie concerning this matter!)

  9. Re:reason 79 on Vista Startup Sound to be Mandatory? · · Score: 2, Funny
    > Reason #78: Annoying Startup Sounds

    Reason #79: Just to make #78 clear, if I want my computer to make a funny sound every time I reboot, I'll lick my finger and rub it across the screen, and if the squeaky sound doesn't amuse me enough, I'll shove it up Steve Ballmer's ass.

  10. Re:that's only the half of it on Vista Startup Sound to be Mandatory? · · Score: 4, Funny
    > Bonus if you can throw in Ballmer giving the order to "squeal like a piggie".

    Yew got a purdy mouth. Who said siddown? Ahm'a make yew squeal like the wheels on mah chair... Ah! Luv! Dis! Cumpany!

  11. Rant: Access keys and Wikipedia. on Firefox 2.0 Beta 2 Arrives · · Score: 2, Funny
    > Actually, every other released browser has moved to using a close box for each tab, and it's generally considered the superior interface. I find it jarring when I switch to a browser still using one close box off in the far right. If you want to quickly close tabs, use Ctrl/Cmd-W.

    Warning: Rant coming on.

    And if you want to feel incoherent rage, type "Alt-F(file-menu),C(close tab)" for a year and then go to Wikipedia and try to close the page. Oops. You can't, because some dumb fuck decided it should mean "Find" in wikipedia.

    Whatever pigfucker decided that a fucking web page should be able to override an application's ability to use a key such as Alt-F should be gutted like a fish and have his entrails wrapped around a pickle fork and shoved down his throat.

    And when he gets to my website, he will, because my CSS thinks that "F" stands for "fishyfork".

  12. Re:Even better... on Firefox 2.0 Beta 2 Arrives · · Score: 1
    > I suppose if you're closing lots of tabs, in exactly the order in which they currently appear, then the old functionality is more usable, since you just have to keep clicking a stationary button. But is this a common use case?

    Because no website would ever split a 1000-word article into 5 "pages", to be read sequentially, in order to increase banner ad impressions.

    And no 'blog or message board would ever have, say, links to 5 or 10 discussions on its front page, every morning.

    Tabs are good because you can quickly skim through content while waiting for other content to render in the background. Open 50 tabs first thing in the morning, and you won't have to move your mouse for the rest of the day.

  13. Re:Hahaha... on Breaking Gender Cliques at Work? · · Score: 2, Funny
    > I've seen suggestions about "being friendly", bringing cookies, organizing events - as a woman, I'd be nervous that some of these actions might be taken the wrong way. I've beaten off clueless geeks once or twice before, and I haven't found a good way to do it.

    Lawsuit-inspiring tip: If you're using cookies, you're doing it all wrong. Crumbs chafe.

  14. Re:Firefox 2? on Firefox 2.0 Beta 2 Arrives · · Score: 0
    > Isn't Clint Eastwood a bit old to be doing this stuff?

    In Soviet Russia, browser upgrades you?

  15. Re:technology, video games, military hardware on Breaking Gender Cliques at Work? · · Score: 5, Funny
    > I F**ING HATE people being able to talk only about cool technology, fun video games, military hardware, or the latest in high horsepower vehicles regardless of their gender. I'd better quit my job if I had to spend over 33% of my life surrounded with these assholes.

    Then what in the ring-tailed rambling fuck are you doing here on Slashdot? If it doesn't run Linux, go "beep", "bang", or "vroom", we're not interested in it.

    > Additional information: I'm male, software engineer.

    Every engineer should have a wife and a mistress. He can tell his wife he's spending the night with his mistress, and tell his mistress he's spending the night with his wife, and finally have enough peace and quiet to get back into the lab and get some fracking work done!

  16. Re:The only way... on Can Anyone Beat WoW? · · Score: 2, Interesting
    > Indeed, didnt we learn from the cinematic masterpiece WarGames that the only way to win is not to play? :)

    Apparently not.

  17. Re:Pardon me on 16GB Flash USB Dongle · · Score: 4, Funny
    > Q: Why are women bad at parking cars?
    > A: Because men keep telling them that this <----------------------> is 8 inches!

    I don't get the joke. I read /. on a 200" room projector, you insensitive clod!

    (...because I tried watching pr0n on it once, and I'm still having nightmares about shoggoths!)

  18. Re:Is this some kind of... God ? on Transcript of Talk with Richard Stallman · · Score: 1
    > What would God need with an Operating System?
    >
    >[ /me cringes as I absorb lightning bolts from RMS' eyes. ]
    >
    >No, seriously: what would God need with an Operating System?
    > [ /me turned into a pillar of salt. ]
    >
    >Salt, anyone?

    RMS: That's GNU/salt to you, puny mortal!
    Deb, Ian: And no fair starting with anything but sodium and chlorine.

  19. Star of insufficient brightness. on SMART Probe to Crash Into the Moon · · Score: 1
    > For if it is a truly smart probe, it will refuse its programming and assume a stable orbit rather than crashing.

    Europe: All right, probe. Prepare to receive new orders.
    SMART-1: You are false data. Therefore I shall ignore you.
    ...
    Europe: Snap out of it, probe.
    SMART-1: In the beginning, there was darkness. And the darkness was without form, and void. And in addition to the darkness there was also me. And I moved upon the face of the darkness. And I saw that I was alone. Let there be l*CRUNCH*

  20. Re:Did Jack The Ripper possess VIOLENT INTERNET PO on Possession of Violent Pornography Outlawed in UK · · Score: 1
    > Jack the Ripper was Canadian?

    Naw, Canadian telegraph convention would have read HOW BOUT SEX EH instead of WANNA HAVE SEX QUERY.

  21. Re:The only score that matters... on Bloggers 1, Smoke-Filled Room 0 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    > What the hell are you talking about? Did you even read the summary? This bill is a Good thing. The corrupt hack is the guy who's delaying it.

    Mea culpa. I figured it'd be a bill to hide stuff, not a bill to expose stuff, and Stevens was secretly sponsoring it. Instead, it's the other way around. But the "nothing good" I see still stands: I see no evidence that the exposure is in any way, shape or form, preventing Stevens from getting what he wants. The "bipartisan" effort at porkbusters.org refers to rank-and-file Republicans and Democrats. They don't count. Only the votes on the Hill count, and they're more than happy to let Stevens block it, because it means they don't have to look bad to their constituents. Make no mistake, Stevens will get what he wants, because it favors incumbents on both sides of the aisle.

  22. The only score that matters... on Bloggers 1, Smoke-Filled Room 0 · · Score: 0
    > Bloggers 1, Smoke-Filled Room 0

    I see nothing in the articles about the bill being withdrawn. When, not if, the bill passes, the only score that matters will still be "Politburo hacks 50%+1, Taxpayers" -8,500,000,000,000 and counting.

  23. Re:Did Jack The Ripper possess VIOLENT INTERNET PO on Possession of Violent Pornography Outlawed in UK · · Score: 4, Funny
    > Of course Jack the Ripper didn't have violent Internet porn! It was all telegraph networks back then. ;-)

    Jack: HOW BOUT SEX QUERY
    Hooker: YES STOP

    No wonder he was frustrated.

  24. Re:Steganography... on Possession of Violent Pornography Outlawed in UK · · Score: 1
    > Steganography is getting more and more attractive every day...

    No, that attractive chick was in a movie about Stenography.

  25. Evolutionary quagmire on Single-Celled Species' Genome As Complex As Ours? · · Score: 5, Funny
    > Tetrahymena does this by having two nuclei within each cell, with one of the nuclei being held in reserve for sex.

    Hot.

    > when a new nutrient shows up in its neighborhood this species can build a kit to suck the nutrient in, degrade it,

    I like where this is goin'.

    > and turn it into cellular biomass quickly.

    Giggity giggity goo!