Slashdot Mirror


User: MoneyT

MoneyT's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
4,025
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 4,025

  1. Re:What's Interesting About This Is. on U.S. Lists Web Sites as Terrorist Organizations · · Score: 1

    Was Gandhi and his followers considered terrorists? Remember, the sites are listed as ailises of existing terrorist organizations. THe site itself is not listed as a terrorist org.

  2. Re:Countdown clock on Apple Sets Oct. 24th Release For Mac OS X 10.3 · · Score: 1

    Actualy I was suggesting they would go Win2k to Win ME to one version of XP and I calculated the minimum and maximum price paths. Even if you factor ME out of the equation, and just go from 2k to XP (a reasonable upgrade path) it was still more expensive.

  3. Re:Lovely. Not that I'll use it... on Apple to Launch iTunes for Windows · · Score: 1

    I suppose it would be too much to ask that you click the button that says manualy update iPod

  4. Re:Why? on Apple to Launch iTunes for Windows · · Score: 2, Informative

    Apparently you've never wanted to play your music on any non-apple product without first expanding your files to 12x their original size, and then possibly having to re-compress them to another format

    When I want to do that, I copy the file over to my windows computer, change the name from .m4p to .m4a, and QT for windows glady plays the file.

    click for more info

    Or I could likewise use a program like Audio Hijack and take the digital sound from my computer and rencode it as m4a

    I also imagine you've never had to deal with losing a hard disk full of all those precious songs and having to redownload and re-license them for your new machine because you can't just copy them over.


    As opposed to say, having to repurchase all of your CDs if your house burns down? I thought we were all past the point where we never made backups of our systems.

    Certainly though, you've drunk Apple's cool-aid with respect to AAC having acceptable sound quality, despite strong evidence that it's only *marginally* better than MP3 at low bit rates (which ITMS files are).


    Relevant to DRM because....?

  5. Re:Dead? on Apple G4 Power Supply Woes? · · Score: 1

    Because 97% of power supplies don't come in the long and squat form that fits nicely in the top of a G4 tower.

  6. Re:Maybe not on Apple Sets Oct. 24th Release For Mac OS X 10.3 · · Score: 1

    No, no pre release, but you do get a copy of the OS every time they release an update.

  7. Re:Business Model? on Apple Sets Oct. 24th Release For Mac OS X 10.3 · · Score: 1

    And amazingly enough it's still cheaper than running and upgrading windows:

    http://simplest-shop.com/Macintosh--1-229660-sof tw are.html

    Let's see
    X.1 Sept 28, 2001
    X.2 Aug 23, 2002

    That puts 11 months between those two releases

    And assuming the earliest release of X.3 in sept, that would be 13 months from the last release. And 16 months in december.

    By contrast:

    Windows 2000 , Feb 17 2000
    Windows ME released Sept 14 2000

    That would be 7 months

    Windows XP Oct 25 2001

    That would be 13 months

    And lets compare prices:

    Mac OS X $130 always (full version)

    Windows 2000 $320

    Windows ME $110 (upgrade) or $210 (full)

    XP Home $100 (upgrade) $200 (full)

    XP Pro $200 (upgrade) $300 (full)

    So from OS X.0 to X.3

    March 2001 to (assumed) Sept 2003 (31 Months)

    You've spent $390

    From Windows 2000 to Windows XP (19 Months)

    Feb 2000 to Oct 2001

    You spend at minimum $530 and at most $830

  8. Re:Countdown clock on Apple Sets Oct. 24th Release For Mac OS X 10.3 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Still cheaper than buying and upgrading windows:

    http://simplest-shop.com/Macintosh--1-229660-sof tw are.html

    Let's see
    X.1 Sept 28, 2001
    X.2 Aug 23, 2002

    That puts 11 months between those two releases

    And assuming the earliest release of X.3 in sept, that would be 13 months from the last release. And 16 months in december.

    By contrast:

    Windows 2000 , Feb 17 2000
    Windows ME released Sept 14 2000

    That would be 7 months

    Windows XP Oct 25 2001

    That would be 13 months

    And lets compare prices:

    Mac OS X $130 always (full version)

    Windows 2000 $320

    Windows ME $110 (upgrade) or $210 (full)

    XP Home $100 (upgrade) $200 (full)

    XP Pro $200 (upgrade) $300 (full)

    So from OS X.0 to X.3

    March 2001 to (assumed) Sept 2003 (31 Months)

    You've spent $390

    From Windows 2000 to Windows XP (19 Months)

    Feb 2000 to Oct 2001

    You spend at minimum $530 and at most $830

  9. Re:Worth it. on Apple Sets Oct. 24th Release For Mac OS X 10.3 · · Score: 1

    Hmm, as a student, one would think you would be getting it for free. Oh well, I guess not everyone signed up for a developer account.

  10. Re:Good for the semi guys: on Motorola To Spin Off Chip Division · · Score: 1

    Can you imagine Intel using AMD PC's?

    Heh, just an amusing factoid for you. Up untill I think a little before the debut of the P4, Intel's marketing division used almost exclusively macintosh computers. Does that count?

    But yeah, i see your point, I just think the death of WinPPC had more to do with no mac users wanting Windows rather than Moto not marketing the chip well.

  11. Re:Good for the semi guys: on Motorola To Spin Off Chip Division · · Score: 1

    A note on the PPC Windows. IIRC at the time this was a availible, the primary consumer of the PPC chips were Apple users, so it wasnt' so much that motorola let it die so much as there was no demand.

  12. Re:Third time on Apple's Dual 2GHz By The Numbers · · Score: 1

    And if I want a windows box I am limited to one OS vendor. And if I want a RedHat box I am limited to one OS vendor.

    So the only advantage is hardware choice, but that's only for the base system. And even there, I've said it before, how much of a choice do you have?

    Intel or AMD
    Soundblaster or Soundblaster
    NVIDIA or ATI

  13. Re:Back at MPAA headquarters.... on MPAA Ruins Own Films As Anti-Piracy Measure · · Score: 1

    I realize that, but don't you think that as the film degrades from repeated showings that these spots are going to become very noticeable and detract from the movie going experience? Why should I pay $10 to see a movie if there's going to be splotches all over it?

  14. Back at MPAA headquarters.... on MPAA Ruins Own Films As Anti-Piracy Measure · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Let's see how we can piss off and ailienate our customers some more. Oh I know, let's give them even less of a reason to buy, view or care about movies. That'll teach em."

  15. Re:The real problem with Apple computers on Apple's Dual 2GHz By The Numbers · · Score: 1

    Yeah, it's a real shame that companies like yellow dog linux and mkLinux, and LinuxPPC don't make OSes for the mac.

    And it's even sadder that only Apple makes macintosh hardware. Cause I would sure love to be able to buy third party hardware like the stuff mentioned at www.dealmac.com

  16. Re:Assumptions on Apple's Dual 2GHz By The Numbers · · Score: 1

    go for it. seriously, I'm sure it would come out cheaper, but let's find out how much.

  17. Re:what I like... on Apple's Dual 2GHz By The Numbers · · Score: 1

    While you wont find GTA (and why buy it for the PC when my PS2 will do just as nicely?) you can find plenty of mac games:

    http://www.insidemacgames.com/

    to top it off, if you want ROMs and emulators try:

    www.emulation.net

  18. Re:Tried that on Mac OS X 10.2.8 Update, Take Two · · Score: 1

    Hmm, one of the posters up above reported they had crashing problems in the last update when the processor was running at or close to 100%. Any apps that are chewing up a lot of CPU time? (run "top" in the terminal)

  19. Re:This doesn't fix the crashing for me on Mac OS X 10.2.8 Update, Take Two · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No problems here, have you tried booting from another disk and repairing permissions that way?

  20. Re:Oh please on Innocent File-Sharers Could Appear Guilty? · · Score: 2, Informative

    hmmm, let's see. I've used P2P apps to:

    *Remotely administer files on a computer
    *Access files on my PC while at class
    *Back up data
    *Aquire legal distributions of applications
    *Aquire legal distributions of media
    *Aquire quick information about a song or artist
    *Communicate and (legaly) share files between friends and co-workers

    seems like legitimate uses to me.

  21. Re:Well... on Free Software for Politics · · Score: 1

    What would you call the area of a plane in which the pilots and crew are located?

  22. Re:Well... on Free Software for Politics · · Score: 1

    Source?

  23. Re:Well... on Free Software for Politics · · Score: 1

    sure it does. If the dock is not ready to recieve them, they would have spent their time sitting off the coast waiting anyways. And even if it was ready to recieve them, they still aren't off duty until the day they were scheduled to be.

  24. Re:Well... on Free Software for Politics · · Score: 1

    Any actual links to evidence on that? The carrier was comming in, it had not yet arrived, so there would be no going back. As for the difference in costs as opposed to riding marine one in. Probably negligable.

  25. Re:Well... on Free Software for Politics · · Score: 1

    Well, to start with, the delay was really no delay at all given that the carrier was ahead of schedule and most likely would have just spent the extra day off the coast.

    Second, given the nature of the plane, the only place the president coul dhave been was in the cockpit.