Slashdot Mirror


Mac OS X 10.2.8 Update, Take Two

javaxman writes "OS X users will find Mac OS X Update version 10.2.8 is available via 'Software Update'. If you did not install the previous 10.2.8 update, the size of the new update is 40.6MB. If you installed the previous update, the size of the new update is small, ~680K... if you can connect to the network, that is. Clearly you get different downloads depending on what you did with the previous 10.2.8 update. Apple Knowledge Base article 25524 has the details. It looks very familiar. I'm installing mine right away, how about you?"

208 comments

  1. worst thing was 2 weeks to get ssh/sendmail fixes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Apple, I expect better of you --- even the OS X server people had to remove the system-installed version and compile their own to not be vulnerable to Denial of Service attacks. I suggest people post feedback for this issue.

  2. Hate to nitpick/troll/whatever... by bwhaley · · Score: 1

    If you installed the previous update, the size of the new update is small, ~680K...

    ... but it reported 580k for me. :)

    --
    "I either want less corruption, or more chance
    to participate in it." -- Ashleigh Brilliant
    1. Re:Hate to nitpick/troll/whatever... by javaxman · · Score: 1
      Your nitpick is appreciated.

      I did not install the original update, and was repeating something someone else told me ( which is why I used '~' for the smaller number, but new for sure the 40.6MB number ).

      Please be gentle. This is the first time I've submitted a story. I wasn't even aware that everything would be on one line, or I'd have made the story more concise.

      On the other hand, you're going to give me a hard time for a little 100k difference? Admit it, you love to nitpick !

    2. Re:Hate to nitpick/troll/whatever... by bwhaley · · Score: 2, Funny

      On the other hand, you're going to give me a hard time for a little 100k difference? Admit it, you love to nitpick!

      Ahh, but what would slashdot be without nitpickers?! This site is based on unimportant details that are made in to a big deal!

      Just ask the grammar nazi...

      --
      "I either want less corruption, or more chance
      to participate in it." -- Ashleigh Brilliant
    3. Re:Hate to nitpick/troll/whatever... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unimportant details that are made in to a big deal

      Surely, you mean into?

    4. Re:Hate to nitpick/troll/whatever... by klez23 · · Score: 2, Funny
      This site is based on unimportant details that are made in to a big deal!

      That should be "made into a big deal."

      Love,
      the grammar nazi

  3. Deja Vou by profet · · Score: 5, Funny

    In the immortal words of George "DoubleYa":

    "Fool me once...shame on you....
    Fool me twice...umm....
    Shame..on...Shame...on...
    Well you're not gonna fool me again..."

    I'll wait for some other people to install first..

    1. Re:Deja Vou by ioErr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unwilling to learn from the mistakes of others I installed the upgraded version of 10.2.8 on my eMac twenty minutes ago.

      So far, so good. The network does work, the computer is able to wake from sleep, no crashes when using the processor 100%.

    2. Re:Deja Vou by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1
      Did Bush really say that?

      It's so sad/funny/pathetic when you can't tell the difference between satire about him, and something he acutally said.

    3. Re:Deja Vou by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, he did.

    4. Re:Deja Vou by Kjyn · · Score: 1
      Yes, it was something similar

      http://politicalhumor.about.com/cs/bushvideos/

      check out "Fool me once..."

  4. The mini update created no problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I had the "pulled" 10.2.8 update installed and downloaded this small fix. I had not experienced any problems with the "former" 10.2.8 update. And everything is working fine with this Mac OS X 10.2.8 (6R73) update. OK, I admit to fixing permissions as a precaution. So go ahead and download!

  5. yup! by nocomment · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm installing mine righ
    [NO CARRIER]

    --
    /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
    /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
    1. Re:yup! by cunnilingus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      now that's a cool news.. geesh.. maybe we should start posting every linux/windows updates here too ? i mean, wtf ?

    2. Re:yup! by KJSwartz · · Score: 1

      I was going to mod this one down, but couldn't reach the mouse from the floor!

  6. This doesn't fix the crashing for me by RalphBNumbers · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This may fix the ethernet problem, I don't know, it didn't affect me, but there were other problems with 10.2.8, www.MacFixIt.com made a fairly extensive list.

    This definitely does not fix the crashing problem. (on my beige G3)
    It can happen at any time, and is sometimes mistaken as an inability to wake from sleep, but you can get it to happen reliably by trying to repair permissions.
    It outputs the following, then shuts down the display, and needs to be hard-restarted.

    2003-10-03 17:36:12 -0400 - Repair of privileges has started
    We are using special permissions for the file or directory ./System/Library/Filesystems/hfs.fs/hfs.util. New permissions are 33261
    Permissions differ on ./System/Library/Filesystems/hfs.fs/hfs.util, should be -rwxr-xr-x , they are -rwsr-xr-x
    Owner and group corrected on ./System/Library/Filesystems/hfs.fs/hfs.util
    Perm issions corrected on ./System/Library/Filesystems/hfs.fs/hfs.util
    Grou p differs on ./private/var/run/utmp, should be 0, group is 1
    Owner and group corrected on ./private/var/run/utmp
    Permissions corrected on ./private/var/run/utmp

    --
    "The worst tyrannies were the ones where a governance required its own logic on every embedded node." - Vernor Vinge
    1. Re:This doesn't fix the crashing for me by MoneyT · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No problems here, have you tried booting from another disk and repairing permissions that way?

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    2. Re:This doesn't fix the crashing for me by sg3000 · · Score: 4, Funny

      > This definitely does not fix the crashing problem. (on my
      > beige G3)

      Indeed! And this new petroleum distillate from the local service shoppe doesn't work for me either. Without the added "lead", it wreaks havoc with my Stutz Bearcat.

      Tell you what, if you can find a way to re-vulcanize my tires, I'll give you a shiny new nickel so you can buy a new Macintosh.

      --
      Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
    3. Re:This doesn't fix the crashing for me by Pfhor · · Score: 1

      Don't repaid permisions from another drive.

      Repair permissions uses the information stored on the boot drive to determine what the right permissions should be, therefore if you repair the permissions from your none standard boot partition, all your permissions will be borked when you boot back on that partition.

    4. Re:This doesn't fix the crashing for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your two installs are identical, then booting off another disk doesn't matter, it'll repair them just fine.

      Even if it doesn't match identically, if you only do a basic install of 10.2.8 and repair permissions, it can at least fix base 10.2.x stuff on your first drive. You will then have to boot off your normal drive and run repair permissions AGAIN to get the specific .pkg information stored on it.

      The fix for the "crash during repair permissions" problem is well known - boot off another disk and repair permissions. It works. Just because it's not perfect solution (have to repair permissions twice) doesn't make it any less of a solution. At least your permissions get fixed. In this case the ends justify the means.

      Now, if you've deviated from the standard OS X installation (e.g. swap partition and other standard un*x niceties), then all bets are off that you won't fubar your install. But if you deviate from the norm, then you have to depend on yourself to figure out how to fix your system. If you're uncomfortable with that, don't do it in the first place.

    5. Re:This doesn't fix the crashing for me by ahknight · · Score: 1

      Repair Permissions uses the files in /Library/Receipts on the drive being repaired to repair it. I've successfully repaired a 10.1.5 machine from 10.2 and vice-versa before. It works fine.

    6. Re:This doesn't fix the crashing for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Just because it's not perfect solution... doesn't make it any less of a solution

      Functionlly it might be a solution but it's more like a workaround
    7. Re:This doesn't fix the crashing for me by Mononoke · · Score: 1
      This definitely does not fix the crashing problem. (on my beige G3) It can happen at any time, and is sometimes mistaken as an inability to wake from sleep, but you can get it to happen reliably by trying to repair permissions. It outputs the following, then shuts down the display, and needs to be hard-restarted.
      I'm glad to know I'm not the only one. Same exact symptoms.

      I got my permissions to repair, however. I had to pull my second video card (Voodoo II) to do it, but it did finally make it through. My machine will shut down the on-board video, but not the Voodoo card when it freezes up.

      I figured the problem had to do with the fact I've overclocked my processor and PCI bus, and some operations were just too intensive and caused errors.

      That's what I get for having a franken-mac, I suppose.

      --
      NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
    8. Re:This doesn't fix the crashing for me by krilli · · Score: 1

      I have no mod points so I am pushing this up with my head.

      *Nnng*.

      *Nnng*.

      --
      Jag pratar lite svenska.
    9. Re:This doesn't fix the crashing for me by tgibbs · · Score: 1
      Indeed! And this new petroleum distillate from the local service shoppe doesn't work for me either. Without the added "lead", it wreaks havoc with my Stutz Bearcat.
      Actually, beige G3's are nice machines. The are nearly as fast as the iBooks many people are still carrying. For many tasks, such as web browsing, word processing, and serving up iTunes music, they work quite well.

      And mine works just fine with 10.2.8, and it doesn't hang if I repair permissions.

    10. Re:This doesn't fix the crashing for me by Halo1 · · Score: 1

      We had the same problem on our Beige G3. At the Apple discussion forums, someone said he fixed it by setting the Energy Saver settings so that the computer never goes to sleep and no separate setting for the screen (so it also never goes to sleep). We did that here at home (without rebooting, since those settings immediately go into effect), but it crashed again. Since rebooting afterwards, it has not yet crashed a single time yet though, so it does seem to help.

      --
      Donate free food here
  7. Re:This fix is great! by aurum42 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    You are a troll. Unless you're on a G3 with 64 MB of RAM and an ancient ultra slow drive copying to a tape drive, there's no way a 17 MB copy takes 2 minutes, just as the original 17 MB in 20 minutes thing was an urban legend spawned by some apple detractor.

    --
    "The slave who knows his master's will and does not get ready...will be be beaten with many blows."Luke 12:47-48
  8. Right ... by medeii · · Score: 0

    I'm installing mine right away, how about you?

    I think I'll wait for others this time around, thanks. My poor powerbook's battery life certainly can't take another hit while it's already flat on its back.

    And no, it actually did affect the battery life on my machine, not just the timer.

    --
    got standards? --- http://www.w3.org/
    1. Re:Right ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mine too...went from about 2.5 hrs on "normal" usage, down to about 1.5 hrs (real time, not indicated time). Weirdly it seems to drain faster if I'm *not* using it (i.e. disable sleep, and let is just sit there, in order to try the "callibrate battery" thing). I did a clean install back to 10.2.6 and it still sucks just the same.

      It sure would be nice to know if the new update puts it back to normal.

    2. Re:Right ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It can help to zap that parameter ram and such. There are some commands you enter in the console. I don't really remember the details but look around for battery fixes involving the console. My iBook once reported my battery as dead, and treated it as such until I did this and it got all its original life back. It might help with arbitrary charging problems.

    3. Re:Right ... by AvantLegion · · Score: 1

      Same here. I switched my timer to a percentage, so as not to be distracted by it - but I found that my battery life definitely was reduced. Too early to tell for the new update.

  9. 12" PowerBook Install Success by Llywelyn · · Score: 2, Informative

    Installed the update to the update, no problems so far, will keep apprised if the situation changes.

    --
    Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
    1. Re:12" PowerBook Install Success by jsmilesm00th · · Score: 1

      Here we go again, just installed the "Take Two" version 10.2.8 on my 12" 867MHz PowerBook G4 (I never installed the original eroneous version). Now everytime I restart my clock is resetting to December 31st 1969 @ 7pm. I have been reading and found that this also affected the 10.2.4 release. Anyone else having any problems. I have tried resetting the PRAM, but to no avail. I have also set the network synchronization setting, but it resets also, everytime the machine is reset :)

      --
      All life is vibration
    2. Re:12" PowerBook Install Success by Llywelyn · · Score: 1

      Repair permissions, the other white meat.

      --
      Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
  10. Tried that by RalphBNumbers · · Score: 1

    I tried that, although it was before I installed the replacement-10.2.8 version.
    And I've tried repairing permissions in single-user mode too. (it doesn't crash, but it doesn't fix the problem either).

    --
    "The worst tyrannies were the ones where a governance required its own logic on every embedded node." - Vernor Vinge
    1. Re:Tried that by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      Hmm, one of the posters up above reported they had crashing problems in the last update when the processor was running at or close to 100%. Any apps that are chewing up a lot of CPU time? (run "top" in the terminal)

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  11. Re:worst thing was 2 weeks to get ssh/sendmail fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Uhoh, Apple zealot alert. Meanwhile, moving into the land of people who actually have to get work done with their machines, waiting 2 weeks for a security fix is actually significant. I doubt the (unusually ontopic) first post is going to see positive moderation, because it dares to make sensible criticism.

  12. Just installed it... by CoolCat · · Score: 2, Informative

    .. and somehow Finder seems to be a litle more responsive on my powerbook 15"...

    1. Re:Just installed it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Amazing. A Mac user discovers that REBOOTING his machine makes it faster. Will wonders never cease?

      OS X is a little weird. If you have too little RAM--if you swap, in other words--rebooting makes your machine faster because it cleans out fragmented memory pages. If you have enough (i.e., too much) RAM, rebooting actually slows you down because with tons of RAM you can end up caching most of your applications in RAM even when they're not running.

      I have a gig of RAM in my G4, and it gets faster and faster as I use it.

    2. Re:Just installed it... by CoolCat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah right, like I've never rebooted before this update.

    3. Re:Just installed it... by damiam · · Score: 2, Insightful
      OS X is a little weird.

      It's not like things don't work the exact same way in every other OS created in the past 10 years.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    4. Re:Just installed it... by azav · · Score: 1

      re: rebooting, why is it that after I reboot, I generally get 500 MEG back on my hard drive 1G TI. Is the garbage collection that slow to reclaim swapdisk space on OS X or what? Anyone know what is going on?

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    5. Re:Just installed it... by Dr.+Sp0ng · · Score: 1

      why is it that after I reboot, I generally get 500 MEG back on my hard drive 1G TI

      That's probably from clearing out /tmp.

      Also keep in mind that Finder's "free space" reporting seems to lag pretty badly behind reality. If you want to know how much space you *really* have free at any given moment, try 'df -k'.

    6. Re:Just installed it... by FredFnord · · Score: 1

      > That's probably from clearing out /tmp.

      If your /tmp is that big, you're doing something very strange. No, that is, of course, the extra swap file(s) that MacOS X creates when it runs out of swap space with the first swap file it creates. You reboot, the extra swap file goes away, and doesn't get recreated for a while.

      Incidentally, if you use up that 500 megs in the mean time, so you don't have enough space on the boot drive for MacOS X to create a new swap file when it needs to, Bad Things Happen.

      Trust me.

      -fred

      --
      Sign #11 of Slashdot overdose: You see the phrase 'moderate Republican' and you wonder if that would be a +1 or a -1.
    7. Re:Just installed it... by Arkham · · Score: 1

      The Mac equivalent of the "...profit!" joke is "the new release makes my machine more "Snappy(TM)".

      --
      - Vincit qui patitur.
    8. Re:Just installed it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yeah right, like I've never rebooted before this update.

      You are talking about the time you installed the last update, right? Why else would you have needed to reboot? Rebooting is like getting the computer to pass out from too much alcohol. Sending it to sleep is like, like that other thing you can do to lose consciousness. I forgot, but there is something.

    9. Re:Just installed it... by CoolCat · · Score: 1

      Nah... I reboot once every few months or so.. I don't want to forget how I reboot my Mac :)

    10. Re:Just installed it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good work. Always be prepared.

    11. Re:Just installed it... by mashx · · Score: 1
      Vinicit qui patitur

      Don't you mean 'Vincit qui patitur'? I only noticed because that is the motto of the high school I went to. And yes they did teach me not to end sentences in prepositions, but I agree with Winston Churchill on that point.

      --

      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~
  13. G5 version of 10.2.8 is out... by BobWeiner · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...but not showing up in the Software Update. Odd, because Apple has this page on the G5 10.2.8 update. Has anyone else been able to download the G5 version of 10.2.8 using the Software Update?

    Bob

    --
    The PC Weenies: 11 Years of Online Tech 'Too
    1. Re:G5 version of 10.2.8 is out... by speechpoet · · Score: 1

      Not at this end. And contrary to what Apple's G5 10.2.8 update page says, the Apple downloads page doesn't list it.

      My theory? This is Apple's way of conditioning us to wait a prudent interval before installing a software update that has a small but measurable risk of causing spontaneous combustion in goldfish, draining your lymph nodes and shrinking all your synthetic fabrics. I, for one, am grateful. Really.

    2. Re:G5 version of 10.2.8 is out... by FredFnord · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's been a while since my lymph nodes have been drained, I'm probably due by now.

      I need a lube job, too, but that's an entirely different issue.

      -fred

      Grr. No, slashdot, I'm not behind a wacky firewall, it really HAS been one minute since I last posted. I'm fast. Deal with it.

      Please?

      --
      Sign #11 of Slashdot overdose: You see the phrase 'moderate Republican' and you wonder if that would be a +1 or a -1.
  14. Now it's gone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The link to the knowledge base article return a "not found" error ... searching downloads for "10.2.8" returns no results ... the Apple software update page doesn't have it ... didi this get pulled too?

  15. Battery life is back! by Trurl's+Machine · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I don't want to start a holy war here, but I was really scared that 10.2.8 ate my battery life for good. I'm so happy to see the familiar 4h+ is back (battery is about a year old; iBook 800 12").

  16. OpenSSL update? by phch · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's a little unclear whether the new problems in OpenSSL have been patched. According to the CERT page, Apple is reporting the vulnerability as fixed in 10.2.8. On the other hand, I have a 10.2.8 machine that still indicates OpenSSL version 0.9.6i, which is supposedly vulnerable.

    Again, on a side note, I wish Apple would allow security updates to be installed independently of the main bulk upgrade.

    1. Re:OpenSSL update? by AnamanFan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Apple made their own patch fixes with-in the OpenSSL (and others), hence similar verison number.

      This link has a link to the mailing list post from Apple that states the details. To access this link, use the username and password: archives

      --
      AnamanFan - Trying to find the Truth, one post at a time.
    2. Re:OpenSSL update? by phch · · Score: 1

      I don't see anything about OpenSSL in that link, only OpenSSH. The OpenSSL vulnerability was reported several days after that post.

      Speaking of OpenSSH, it's possible that the OpenSSL vulnerability may render OpenSSH vulnerable. Apparently, the newer versions of OpenSSH do not use OpenSSL for signature validation; however, Apple uses a somewhat older version of OpenSSH (3.4p1).

    3. Re:OpenSSL update? by AnamanFan · · Score: 1

      What a difference a L makes. Sorry for that! I wouldn't know about the SSL holes then. Sorry again!

      --
      AnamanFan - Trying to find the Truth, one post at a time.
    4. Re:OpenSSL update? by petard · · Score: 1

      It's really not unclear at all... I received the following in my inbox:

      [ message edited slightly due to lameness filter ]

      APPLE-SA-2003-10-03 Mac OS X 10.2.8 Revised

      Mac OS X 10.2.8 has been re-posted, and it is updated to address
      issues discovered with certain system configurations. The security
      enhancements in Mac OS X 10.2.8 are identical between the first
      release and the one now available.

      This note describes all security enhancements in Mac OS X 10.2.8,
      with the following new information:

      * Security enhancements for OpenSSL (details below) have been recently
      announced, and we can now disclose the presence of these enhancements
      in Mac OS X 10.2.8.

      * The latest release of Mac OS X 10.2.8 includes support for PowerMac
      G5 systems. The initial 10.2.8 release only applied to PowerMac G4
      systems.

      * A Sendmail workaround for Mac OS X 10.1.x systems is described
      below.

      Mac OS X 10.2.8 contains security enhancements for the following:

      OpenSSL: Fixes CAN-2003-0543, CAN-2003-0544, CAN-2003-0545 to address
      potential issues in certain ASN.1 structures and in certificate
      verification code. To deliver the update in a rapid and reliable
      manner, only the patches for the CVE IDs listed above were
      applied, and not the entire latest OpenSSL library. Thus, the
      OpenSSL version in Mac OS X 10.2.8, as obtained via the
      "openssl version" command, is: OpenSSL 0.9.6i Feb 19 2003

      OpenSSH: Mac OS X 10.2.8 contains the patches to address CVE
      CAN-2003-0693, CAN-2003-0695, and CAN-2003-0682. On Mac OS X
      versions prior to 10.2.8, the vulnerability is limited to a denial
      of service from the possibility of causing sshd to crash. Each
      login session has its own sshd, so established connections are
      preserved up to the point where system resources are exhausted by
      an attack.

      To deliver the update in a rapid and reliable manner, only the
      patches for CVE IDs listed above were applied, and not the entire
      set of patches for OpenSSH 3.7.1. Thus, the OpenSSH version in
      Mac OS X 10.2.8, as obtained via the "ssh -V" command, is:
      OpenSSH_3.4p1+CAN-2003-0693, SSH protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL
      0x0090609f

      fb_realpath(): Fixes CAN-2003-0466 which is an off-by-one error in
      the fb_realpath() function that may allow attackers to execute
      arbitrary code.

      arplookup(): Fixes CAN-2003-0804. The arplookup() function caches
      ARP requests for routes on a local link. On a local subnet only,
      it is possible for an attacker to send a sufficient number of
      spoofed ARP requests which will exhaust kernel memory, leading to
      a denial of service.

      Sendmail: Addresses CVE CAN-2003-0694 and CAN-2003-0681 to fix a
      buffer overflow in address parsing, as well as a potential buffer
      overflow in ruleset parsing.

      How to install Sendmail for Mac OS X 10.1.5 systems:

      - - From the UNIX command-line, perform the following steps:

      1. Download sendmail version 8.12.10 which contains the fix to the
      Zalewski advisory, released on 2003/09/17, by executing the following
      command:
      curl -O ftp://ftp.sendmail.org/pub/sendmail/sendmail.8.12. 10.tar.gz

      2. Verify the integrity of this file by typing:
      cksum sendmail.8.12.10.tar.gz
      which should indicate "834313764 1892497 sendmail.8.12.10.tar.gz"

      3. Unpack the distribution as follows:
      tar xvzf sendmail.8.12.10.tar.gz

      4. Add the following line to your /etc/master.passwd file:
      smmsp:*:25:25::0:0:Sendmail User:/private/etc/mail:/usr/bin/false

      5. Add the following line to your /etc/group file:
      smmsp:*:25:

      6. Now invoke /Applications/Utilities/Netinfo Manager.app and add the
      same smmsp user and group entries to your netinfo database. The
      easiest way is to dup

      --
      .sig: file not found
    5. Re:OpenSSL update? by phch · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the post. Apparently, the web page to look at is here.

      I'm not sure why the OpenSSL version number wasn't modified. As it stands, machines upgraded to 10.2.8 last week do not have the patch, but machines upgraded this week will have it. And since the OpenSSL version number is the same, if you type "openssl version" in the terminal, you get the same result whether you're using 10.2.6 (old), 10.2.8 (old) or 10.2.8 (new).

      At least "ssh -v" indicates that OpenSSH has been patched in 10.2.8 (both the old and new versions).

    6. Re:OpenSSL update? by petard · · Score: 1

      I think the reason the version number wasn't modified is that the OpenSSL group found out about this problem well in advance of its public release and notified a group of vendors in confidence. Apple probably only applied patches for the 4 particular bugs in question rather than updating to the current version. The public release wasn't until 9/30; Apple wouldn't have had it in 10.2.8 but rather in a separate security update if they hadn't gotten it until then.

      To convince yourself of this, you can do compile and run the following[1]:

      #include <openssl/crypto.h>

      int main( int argc, char ** argv ) {
      printf( "OpenSSL library version info: %s\n", SSLeay_version(SSLEAY_VERSION) );
      printf( "Build options: %s\n", SSLeay_version(SSLEAY_CFLAGS) );
      printf( "Build date: %s\n", SSLeay_version(SSLEAY_BUILT_ON) );
      return 0;
      }

      If you save it to the file "sslversion.c", compile it with the command:
      gcc -lcrypto -o sslversion sslversion.c
      When executed, you can see:

      OpenSSL library version info: OpenSSL 0.9.6i Feb 19 2003
      Build options: compiler: cc -arch i386 -arch ppc -g -Os -pipe -Wno-precomp -arch i386 -arch ppc -pipe
      Build date: built on: Sun Sep 14 16:49:23 PDT 2003

      IMO that confirms the fact that Apple had advance notice and had to patch 0.9.6i rather than updating to 0.9.6k. I agree that it is obnoxious that they don't give some indication of this, e.g. OpenSSL 0.9.6i patch X or similar. I've had a similar beef with Red Hat for some time. I think I'll file a bug with Apple.

      [1] The value of compiling and running your own is to make sure you're getting the default system library; I'm not sure how the openssl application was built, and this problem was in the library not in the openssl executable.

      --
      .sig: file not found
    7. Re:OpenSSL update? by phch · · Score: 1

      Nice analysis, thanks. It's too bad the build info isn't already available from the command line.

      Perhaps this means that the withdrawn 10.2.8 release last week already had the OpenSSL update, but Apple couldn't report it until the OpenSSL group publicly announced it.

  17. Re:This fix is great! by milkman_matt · · Score: 1
    I don't want to start a holy war here, but this fix has reduced the time it takes me to copy a 17 meg file from 20 minutes to just over two!

    Even Textedit has a spring in its step!

    Wow, that's a pretty impressive update then, and with the other people talking about it increasing battery life, I -really- want to install this, but after it destroyed my lombard a couple days after the last update... I think i'm a little gunshy about being the first to install updates now..

    -matt

  18. screen savers acting weird by metric152 · · Score: 2, Funny

    The flurry screen saver seems very blocky now. Like a bunch of rectangles on the screen. Also abstract no longer shows pictures. The dock icons also turn into folders now instead of the program icons. The OS does seem a little snappier.

    1. Re:screen savers acting weird by metric152 · · Score: 1

      Just needed a complete restart. Back to normal.

  19. Re:This fix is great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The parent poster speaks the truth and gets moderated "offtopic"-really, the UID of people who moderate should be attached to each comment,so they don't think it's okay to pick some random choice from that pull down menu for a moderation.

  20. Seems to be okay this time by capmilk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No more transparent dock - but other than that everything seems to be just fine.

    1. Re:Seems to be okay this time by sergeantmudd · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, freerangemac.com already has a fix for it though. Go grab version 2.1

  21. Re:This fix is great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, this guy's all right!
    Dude, if you got time, you wanna install an airport card for my girlfriend? I kinda broke the machine last time I tried. : ( I guess that's what happens when you look at goatse before attempting a minor hardware install...

  22. one word by sohp · · Score: 4, Funny

    WORKSFORME

    (ok that's really 3, but bugzilla users will understand)

    1. Re:one word by gryphokk · · Score: 1

      Umm... Dude, that's like, three words, yknow.

      --
      And you, madam, are very ugly. In the morning, I shall be sober.
  23. Doing fine here... by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 1

    ...on a PB G4 550. Finder seems a little slower than usual though... Perhaps they are slowing it down on purpose so that we are all pressured to upgrade to Panther? :^)

  24. 10.2.8 worked fine for me the first time by noewun · · Score: 1

    So I ain't toucing this. If it ain't broke. . .

    --
    I am a believer of momentum and curves.
    1. Re:10.2.8 worked fine for me the first time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ssh is broke, fool

    2. Re:10.2.8 worked fine for me the first time by noewun · · Score: 1

      Since I don't use ssh, I don't care.

      --
      I am a believer of momentum and curves.
    3. Re:10.2.8 worked fine for me the first time by babbage · · Score: 1

      Does it matter if you use SSH? The problem isn't the individual users using or not using SSH (or any other software with a known security hole), but in what remote users can do with that software.

      If SSH is turned on (which it may not be in your case), then it doesn't matter if it gets used or not, it still needs to be patched. If it's off then you're safer, but it's still risky in the long run to leave the broken version on your system: f someone breaks in some other way, they can use the broken SSH (or any other insecure software) to do impolite things.

      Unless you have a good reason not to -- like, say, the 10.2.8 update already hosed your computer once and you're afraid to try it again -- it's best to just fix SSH, whether or not you use it.

    4. Re:10.2.8 worked fine for me the first time by noewun · · Score: 1
      I know all of this. However:

      1) I am the only person with physical access to my machine; 2) SSH is turned off; 3) SSH is also blocked at the firewall; 4) I am lazy.

      --
      I am a believer of momentum and curves.
    5. Re:10.2.8 worked fine for me the first time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SSH was never broke for me. Not with the original 10.2.8 or the supplimental 10.2.8. Uh, oh yeah - Fool.

  25. Re:worst thing was 2 weeks to get ssh/sendmail fix by csoto · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Sendmail and SSH are off by default. Sendmail is particularly difficult (e.g. there's no GUI) to enable.

    --
    There exists no way of exchanging information without making judgments. --Bene Gesserit Axiom
  26. Big enough? by MisterSquid · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... but it reported 580k for me. :)

    640K ought to be enough for anybody.

    --
    blog
    1. Re:Big enough? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MOD UP! MOD UP! HA HA HA HA!

  27. Hmm... by jabberjaw · · Score: 1

    I am on a 15'' 1Ghz tiBook with 10.2.8 and my dock is still transparent...

  28. Battery Timer Weirdness by Eharley · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I just installed the latest update on my 12" Powerbook and wanted to see what exactly they'd done with the battery timer. I was really pissed when my battery life was halved (literally, I timed it), instead of just the indicator lying to me as Apple swore.

    Right now, as I type this post, my battery is at 96% charge and the timer is widly fluctuating starting at 8:35, then 5:35, then 4:45, now 4:10, back to 3:42, and again at 3:59.

    What I really liked about 10.2.6 was that the battery timer was really accurate for some reason. I have read many posts here and on other Macintosh websites that say the battery timer is never to be trusted, but I just couldn't believe them.

    Back to 4:02.

    1. Re:Battery Timer Weirdness by YouHaveSnail · · Score: 1

      The life you'll get out of a fully charged battery obviously depends on the rate at which you draw power. If you run your machine at full speed with the disk spinning, backlight on full blast, playing music from a CD at full volume, and maybe drive an external device or two, your battery won't last as long as if you slow down the processor, turn down the backlight, spin the drive down, etc.

      The battery timer can only estimate how long it will be until you run out of power based on how much power you've been using lately. As your power consumption changes, so too must the battery timer's estimate.

      It may be that 10.2.8 implements some different power management stuff that more readily cycles the processor between full speed and power saving modes, and that's what's confusing the timer. Or, more likely, the Energy Saver preferences were erased during the update and the timer is simply recalibrating itself. The numbers you cite seem to be converging on about 4 hours; give it some more time and see if it doesn't stabilize after a while.

    2. Re:Battery Timer Weirdness by AvantLegion · · Score: 1
      Mine fluctuated a lot shortly after boot. Now, it's fluctuating within a 5 minute range - but fluctuating every few seconds.

      Definitely annoying. The battery timer in 10.2.6 WAS very accurate. I think I'll switch to percentage display so that I don't have to see these minute fluctuations.

    3. Re:Battery Timer Weirdness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The life you'll get out of a fully charged battery obviously depends on the rate at which you draw power

      You know what, you're right. So don't spend 2/3s of your post explaining it.

    4. Re:Battery Timer Weirdness by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      After installing the second 10.2.8 update, I ran my battery all the way down to recalibrate the timer, and now it is reporting 2 hours on a charge, which is half an hour better than before the first 10.2.9 update.

    5. Re:Battery Timer Weirdness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You wanker.

      You spend more time complaining about the post than reading it.

      It's a good explanation.

      Go home dumbtish--you're mamma is calling.

  29. Re:This fix is great! by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

    No it's a joke, not a troll. So sorry you can't tell the difference.

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  30. Re:This fix is great! by jimbolaya · · Score: 1

    The closest thing to that is meta-moderation, which lets you judge moderation as fair/unfair, while still protecting moderators privacy.

    --

    There ain't no rules here; we're trying to accomplish something.

  31. Re:You insensitive clod! by AlienBenefactor · · Score: 0, Troll

    And that's bad? I may get marked troll for this (gulp!) but I have truly never had a bad Linux update (Mandrake or Redhat). I've gotten a few odd distributions with problems, this was quite some time ago, but that's all.

    My G4 Powerbook, and the previous model, have all suffered through some sort of OS X update mess from Apple at one point or another. I still love using OS X. But like the tortose and the hare, the Linux box keeps on going... Or was that that the battery bunny?

    Be happy you have a Linux Box. OS X and Macs are real slick but Linux is a well-oiled tank.

  32. Re:worst thing was 2 weeks to get ssh/sendmail fix by dstillz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Perhaps, if SSH and Sendmail were enabled in a default install, you might have a point.

  33. DANGER Will Robinson by azav · · Score: 1

    Not all is well. On my 1G Ti, Friday's 10.2.8 changed all the icons on my PDFs - even those with custom icons - to Adobe icons. It also changed the owner of my Eudora settings files to Spark ME.

    Don't know what else is wrong but that's not nice.

    Tards.

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    1. Re:DANGER Will Robinson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The original update messed up my icons after the mandatory reboot, but a second reboot cleared them right up. Did you try rebooting again to clear up your icons.

  34. Re:This fix is great! by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Flame me if you'd like

    This sentence is garanteed to get you modded down.

    I recommend not uttering it.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  35. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  36. anyone know... by OneOver137 · · Score: 0, Redundant
    what this:
    "Includes several enhancements for Safari."
    means?
    1. Re:anyone know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's apple speak for "makes the glowing button more hypnotizing than before".

      What the hell do you think it means?

    2. Re:anyone know... by natefanaro · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think they changed the brushed metal look at the top. It looks spotty now. I compared it to iTunes and it just doesn't look right. Anyone else notice this?

  37. only 680k? by FuShock · · Score: 5, Funny

    >If you installed the previous update, the size of >the new update is small, ~680K... if you can >connect to the network, that is.

    Well, you could always put it on a floppy di....damnit.

    --
    %\
    1. Re:only 680k? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only those damned USB floppies are so expensive at $20, we might somehow, possibly find a way to use a floppy disk. Then we would have to figure out how to move the drive from system to system too, how fucking impossible!

    2. Re:only 680k? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thumb drive, CD-R, email...

  38. Re:This fix is great! by phac · · Score: 1
    No, *you* are ignorant WRT ethernet operation.

    Try setting one box to 10baseT, and another to 100baseTX, and then copy the famous 17 meg file. Notice the "time remaining" line... For even more fun, play with the duplex settings.

    The file will (eventually) copy, but the ethernet mismatch will result in many many many collisions that will slow the file transfer to a crawl. I've seen it happen, and the first 10.2.8 update made ethernet changes on my G4 1GB DP that resulted in similar behavior. I fixed it by resetting my speed and duplex settings.

  39. Re:This fix is great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi dork,Ive seen that 17MB slow copy crap and thats been floating around since OS9 days,which is probably what the original guy was referring to,and that story was about a local file copy.OK u may expose some driver bugs if u muck around with ethernet settings and set it to something abnormal and try to copy over the network,but thats not some design level OS bug

  40. Re:worst thing was 2 weeks to get ssh/sendmail fix by Llywelyn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Meanwhile sendmail is not only not enabled by default, but there is no way to enable without the command line.

    As for ssh, is there a working root exploit out? Just about *everything* that connects to the internet is vulnerable to connection overloading via a DoS. This makes it easier, sure, but that a DoS is possible isn't exactly a deal breaker.

    Finally, if you are using these in a production environment where security patches are time-critical, you should probably be compiling your own versions of these services and not depending on Apple.

    I would have liked to see the security patches to come faster as well, but for these kinds of things its not a big deal to me if they are a bit lax.

    --
    Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
  41. Re:This fix is great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's a joke people!!

  42. Wake from sleep issues on 12" PB G4 by tbmaddux · · Score: 1

    Since the update addressed issues I was having with my MS Bluetooth mouse, I installed it. Now I'm having mysterious issues with waking from sleep. Going to try resetting the Power Management Unit as a fix after I give DiskWarrior a shot at the hard drive. Have already reset PRAM and NVRAM with no luck.

    --
    Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?
    1. Re:Wake from sleep issues on 12" PB G4 by tbmaddux · · Score: 1

      As a follow-up, the problem was fixed by the Bluetooth 1.0.2 Firmware updater.

      --
      Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?
  43. Battery life completely gone now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    OK I'm taking Apple to small claims court now no matter what their response. 2 weeks ago I installed 10.2.8 and it shredded my iBook's battery time down to an hour or less. It took nearly 10 phonecalls back and forwards between apple, my applecentre and I to get Apple to give me ANY kind of solution. Even then it was just a fax to tell me they won't do anything unless the battery doesn't work after an update "in the coming days".

    Now it's here, my battery gets 20 minutes, and Apple are still denying responsibility.

    1. Re:Battery life completely gone now by Amiga+Lover · · Score: 0

      And can you tell me ANY manufacturer whose batteries are covered?

      Alright, there's probably one. or two. but they're in the minority. Just buy a goddamned new battery, it'll be less trouble and cost.

    2. Re:Battery life completely gone now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I had the same problem after the first 10.2.8 and reset the power manager in my iBook (800mhz). Battery life went straight back up to 3+ hours. Try that.

    3. Re:Battery life completely gone now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not doing a thing to the iBook unless it comes direct from Apple. If I do, they can turn around and say I performed unauthorised changes which may invalidate any small claims refund for losses I have coming to me. This isn't a notebook I just use as a hobby, this is a machine I need for my employment.

      No, I'm not touching it. It's not my problem, it's Apples. If Apple want to tell me to reset the PMU, they can. Until then it stays exactly as Apple has broken it.

    4. Re:Battery life completely gone now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you don't want a fix, you just want to sue someone. Fucking Americans. Tell you what.

      1. It is your problem. You're losing money.
      2. It is your problem. You're getting upset about it
      3. It is your problem. You're wasting your time with it.
      4. You've been shown a fix.
      5. Small claims courts don't award for lost earnings.

      Now looking at that, what are you trying to achieve? You won't be causing Apple any harm, If it comes to settling with you they either end up telling you the same as people here have, or replace the battery, or replace the iBook. All of which mean nil to Apple in the scheme of things. On the other hand you've lost a few weeks earnings, you're foaming at the mouth, you're making a fool of yourself, and in the end the most you'll have is a fixed iBook, something you can do RIGHT NOW.

      Of course if you wish to make yourself look like a moron you can keep going down the path you are.

    5. Re:Battery life completely gone now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm ignoring the rest of your post as you started off with abuse, and incorrect abuse at that. As it happens I am in Australia

    6. Re:Battery life completely gone now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I'm not touching it. It's not my problem, it's Apples. If Apple want to tell me to reset the PMU, they can. Until then it stays exactly as Apple has broken it.

      I'm laughing now. Really. You need a cluestick mate.

    7. Re:Battery life completely gone now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get fucked then, you little faggot cunt!

    8. Re:Battery life completely gone now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I replaced the original loud fan, the original heatsink and tried once more, and again my claim was refused on the basis I'd done the damage myself.

      What the fuck did you think was going to happen you stupid cunt? You obviously did NOT improve the cooling because the machine started locking up and then died. What apple should have done was come around and shoot you, done us all a favour.

    9. Re:Battery life completely gone now by piscoBandito · · Score: 1

      Well, here's what Apple will tell you to do if/when you call them:

      --zap your PRAM (cmd-opt-pr on boot) - keep holding the key combo down for at least 3 startup chimes.
      --reset your NVRAM (boot into open firmware, cmd-opt-o-f, then type reset-nvram then reset-all
      --reset your PMU (check Apple's KnowledgeBase for instructions on how to do this for your machine.

      start with your PRAM, and if that doesn't work, go to the NVRAM, and if that doesn't work, reset your PMU.

      How to do all these things are in the KnowledgeBase, and no - you won't void your warrenty for doing any of these things.

      If, after all that, it still doesn't work, you're probably going to have to get a new battery somehow. But, I hear that overseas (not US/Canada) Apple will occasionally outsource their service claims to some regional company. So, if that's the case in AU, you'll probably have to work a little harder to get what you need.

    10. Re:Battery life completely gone now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You claim your employment is affected by a problem you refuse to attempt to fix, and it's APPLES problem?

      You know, saying "It's not my problem, it's Apples." doesn't make it so. It's your problem. Apple may have caused it, hell they may have deliberately nuked your iBook battery because they don't want morons using iBooks, but that's your problem, not theirs.

    11. Re:Battery life completely gone now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've already contacted Apple and they have not said to do any of those. I know all about zapping pram, nvram through firmware and resetting the PMU. However until I have instruction DIRECT FROM APPLE I will not be attempting any such thing for reasons I have already given

    12. Re:Battery life completely gone now by Amiga+Lover · · Score: 1, Informative

      Remember when your car gets a flat tire to contact the manufacturer and ask what to do. When they laugh at you, remember to phone again and threaten legal action. Remember also to REFUSE any help from others along the same road as you. Remember to wait for weeks declaring it the manufacturers problem SIMPLY BECAUSE YOU REFUSED TO HELP YOURSELF. Remember after 3 weeks sitting on the side of the road that it's ALL the manufactuerers fault.

      I think you've forgotten the whole concept of helping yourself. Just zap the fucking ram

    13. Re:Battery life completely gone now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I guess that settles that, then...

    14. Re:Battery life completely gone now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I had the same problem. I hated the noise. So I took out all the fans. I figured it would be OK without them. It was much quieter for a while. Then later that day it locked up. I called Apple and told them what happened. They claimed it was my fault for taking the fans out that it needed to cool. What dimwits Apple are. How could it be my fault? Damn them all. I say don't buy Apple computers until they start actually taking their warranty seriously!

    15. Re:Battery life completely gone now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yeah, my Sun T3 disk trays with 15k spindles was really noisy. So I opened the disks up and oiled them and sure enough they were a lot quiter when they spun up.

      Much to my dismay, all my data was gone after the system booted, which leads me to believe that a Solaris glitch deleted all my filesystems. So I called up Sun and they told me to go fuck myself! What the hell is going on in the world?

    16. Re:Battery life completely gone now by catwh0re · · Score: 1

      i think this thread is entirely written up from trolls pasted from other threads.

    17. Re:Battery life completely gone now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > And can you tell me ANY manufacturer whose batteries
      > are covered?

      Dell, Compaq, IBM, Toshiba, Sony, Compaq, Acer, HP...

      Apple are well and truly in the minority by NOT covering them

    18. Re:Battery life completely gone now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look you, I can tell you apple refused to honour their warranty after I filed my TiBooks insides away trying to install an airport card at my freelance gig. I phoned the GNAA and they simply told me "*BSD is dying". I mean, seriously.

      With thanks,
      Father O'Cowboyneal

    19. Re:Battery life completely gone now by trouser · · Score: 1

      Maaaaaaate.

      --
      Now wash your hands.
    20. Re:Battery life completely gone now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what if the flat tire is the manufacturers fault? what then? you cant just presume on things and ask theoretical questions, sometimes it is the manufacturerr sometimes it is just a nail in the road

  44. Dancing Updater by vonFinkelstien · · Score: 2, Funny
    I've installed the update (very tiny) on my iBook 700. However, I am waiting until I finish looking through /. before hitting restart (just in case--I can't be left out of the loop).

    So the Software Update icon is dancing happily in the Dock.

    1. Re:Dancing Updater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can grab the PID of the updater and safely kill the process.

  45. Re:You insensitive clod! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You linux diehards kill me... Back when I was 16 I had this old car a gushed over. Check, tweeked, oiled, and had it purring like a kitten. I had the time and spent quite few$ on just the right hardware making it so. Exactly what you guy's do with you linux boxes.

    Now that I am in the real world I don't have time to fondle over such things. It want it to work and under the work worst conditions.

    Put that linux on a laptop, with wireless 802.11g add the bluetooth sync adress to/from phone, plug and unplug that firewire drive, plugin that USB disk formated FAT so you can transfer that file to Windoze box, Then plug in that DV camera and edit birthday video, sleep it and wake it such that it instantly on and network ready to go for either wired or wireless network, run to that meeting and present that Multi Language slide show, then surf the net and view those streaming Wuicktime, WMP, or Real streams. At night play that quick game of Civilization III or Quake,
    and be compatible with most classic Mac software as well...

    When you do all that and run all the UNIX, ipfw, X11, sendmail, SSH terminal stuff. Then tell me you have happy 100% platform maybe I will think about linux...

    Till then all you have is a nice geek toy with little use in the real world. Get a grip!

  46. They were referring to OS X Server... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...where Sendmail has a GUI.

    1. Re:They were referring to OS X Server... by csoto · · Score: 0

      Nope. Sendmail is not enabled by default on OS X Server. Rather, you use (much to many others' chagrin) Apple Mail Server by default. You have to edit /etc/hostconfig to get it to use Sendmail instead.

      On X "Client" you have to edit that file to enable ANY mail transfer agent (sendmail, in that case).

      --
      There exists no way of exchanging information without making judgments. --Bene Gesserit Axiom
  47. Word of warning.... by solistus · · Score: 1

    immediately after downloading the update, I had a minor startup crash- it just restarted itself, then took a while to boot. It seems to be fine now, but if you have any extremely important data you should back it up just in case (you should always do this before doing anything that touches your system).

  48. That's all well and good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but the limit is 2 minutes.

    YHL. HAND.

  49. Backported patch? by SiMac · · Score: 1

    Definitely wouldn't surprise me.

  50. Re:worst thing was 2 weeks to get ssh/sendmail fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Meanwhile, moving into the land of people who actually GET work done on their machine, there have been instructions available for rolling your own ssh, replete with fix, available for roughly 12 days now.

    Get off your ass, do some work, and stop complaining - you fscking tool.

  51. I kind of got screwed... by dbuttric · · Score: 1

    After applying this update, all my MP3's are now Quicktime Movie files...

    When I try to open one, instead of invoking iTunes, my system opens macam - software to drive my webcam.

    Very confusing. I need to dig some more...

    This is not as bad as my trial with Windows XP this morning... Roaming Profiles SUCK...

    1. Re:I kind of got screwed... by PasteEater · · Score: 1

      What do you mean? Are they literally .mov files, or does the wrong program and that's the end of it?

      If the latter is the case, click on an .mp3 file, hit command-I (or open Apple-I for those of us old timers) and look for the "Open with" drop down menu. Choose iTunes as the program to open it with, and before you are done, click on "change all".

      Done.

      --
      There are two kinds of people in the world: those with loaded guns, and those who dig.
    2. Re:I kind of got screwed... by berniecase · · Score: 1

      Frequently, after an OS X update, files in ~/Library/Caches get deleted, including any custom file -> app bindings you've created. You'll just need to Get Info, Expand Open with, choose your app, and then Change All...

  52. Re:worst thing was 2 weeks to get ssh/sendmail fix by Feral+Bueller · · Score: 1
    How is the parent insightful?

    Please stop encouraging FUD-boi penquinistas who can't RTFA in the first place.

    Thanks.

    --
    - learn to swim.
  53. Why install at all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Unless the update specifically fixes something that you are having a problem with, why install these interim updates at all? Remember the good old days when the free updates offered significant performance increases and new features? (Like 8. something). They ain't doing that anymore.

  54. Re:What happened to my Airport connection?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In case anyone didn't know yet, this is a troll. see here

  55. Re:What happened to my Airport connection?? by customjake · · Score: 1

    First, this is way off the topic of 10.2.8 Did you even READ the instructions? I put an airport card in my PBG4 Ti 667 and it was a breeze. Yes, you have to open the case. OMG, 7 screws... You shouldn't have to cut, trim, shave or even bend a single component to get the card in. Yes, you have to remove some components, but nothing that is actually screwed in. As for PC using easily accessable slots...Who wants their airport card sticking out the side of their laptop? I sure don't. My airport card is active 24-7 and i don't have to worry about bringing it with me. I find it funny how your inability to put in an Airport card is enough for you to reccomend someone to give up a whole platform. As for the $20 to install an Airport card, i'm sure if you took up a collection on /. you'd raise more than enough money for the installation just on the premise of you keeping your mouth shut.

  56. Re:What happened to my Airport connection?? by idsofmarch · · Score: 1

    Please don't feed the trolls.

    --
    Anyone who whines about being modded down should be.
  57. Re:What happened to my Airport connection?? by rebeka+thomas · · Score: 0

    Most normal people would have flipped up the keyboard with the 2 latches there, inserted the airport card, then replaced the keyboard. No unscrewing required.

    Far be it for me to suggest the easy way of doing things however.

    --
    RST
  58. 10.1.5? by HSpirit · · Score: 3, Informative

    The message from Apple Product Security includes advice on fixing the sendmail vulnerability on 10.1.5 - which is a very good thing - but nothing similar for OpenSSH or OpenSSL.

    Now, OK, from what I gather the sendmail bug is more serious in that the vulnerabilities in OpenSSH and OpenSSL seem to be limited to DoS, but wouldn't similar instructions to updating OpenSSH/SSL on 10.1.5 be useful?

    APPLE-SA-2003-10-03 Mac OS X 10.2.8 Revised

    ...

    How to install Sendmail for Mac OS X 10.1.5 systems:

    - - From the UNIX command-line, perform the following steps:

    1. Download sendmail version 8.12.10 which contains the fix to the
    Zalewski advisory, released on 2003/09/17, by executing the following
    command:
    curl -O ftp://ftp.sendmail.org/pub/sendmail/sendmail.8.12. 10.tar.gz

    2. Verify the integrity of this file by typing:
    cksum sendmail.8.12.10.tar.gz
    which should indicate "834313764 1892497 sendmail.8.12.10.tar.gz"

    3. Unpack the distribution as follows:
    tar xvzf sendmail.8.12.10.tar.gz

    4. Add the following line to your /etc/master.passwd file:
    smmsp:*:25:25::0:0:Sendmail User:/private/etc/mail:/usr/bin/false

    5. Add the following line to your /etc/group file:
    smmsp:*:25:

    6. Now invoke /Applications/Utilities/Netinfo Manager.app and add the
    same smmsp user and group entries to your netinfo database. The
    easiest way is to duplicate existing entries and edit them to match
    the entries in steps 4 and 5. For example, in the users pane you
    could select and the duplicate (%D) the entry for "www" and then edit
    the uid/gid/name/home directory fields in the new "www copy" to match
    those in step 4. Similarly, for groups you could select the entry for
    "mail" and duplicate it, editing just the name and gid fields to match
    those in step 5. When you're done, you should see a users/smmsp entry
    and a groups/smmsp entry.

    7. Now you're ready to start building the distribution. cd to the
    sendmail-8.12.10 directory and type "make"

    8. The next two steps will install the new sendmail:

    sudo mkdir /usr/share/man/cat1 /usr/share/man/cat5 /usr/share/man/cat8
    sudo make install

    Make sure the permissions on your root directory are 755 (or set
    DontBlameSendmail in /etc/mail/sendmail.cf) and reboot. You should
    now be running the patched sendmail.
  59. Re:What happened to my Airport connection?? by Mrs.+Grundy · · Score: 1

    So it would seem that tha airport card is difficult to install if you start from the wrong end of the computer. It's like when you try to take the film out of a camera from the lens end...let me tell you, you need to take a lot of shit apart to do that and it's a pain to put back together.

  60. Re:This fix is great! by tolldog · · Score: 1

    I had a render farm that went south because of this. Crappy switches were running in one mode, ethernet on the boxes another... and they were both set to auto negotiate. I dumped the piles of crap for some real switches and they started to work again.

    Never again will I use those switches.

    -Tim

    --
    -I just work here... how am I supposed to know?
  61. Re:worst thing was 2 weeks to get ssh/sendmail fix by valmont · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, maybe Apple has once failed to manage to do the grunt work for you in a timely manner. If i recall well, most other security holes had been addressed very rapidly in the past. This particular one tanked because it was rolled out as part of a buggy overall update. Big deal. That security hole existed on a service that is not enabled by default. And unless you are an Xserve customer with a valid, active support license, Apple doesn't owe you shit. Complain all you want. But if you enable "remote access" from your control panel, you should have a minimal understanding of the risks it presents and be prepared to cope with potential security issues, and unless you pay Apple, be prepared to wait for a patch.

    But you see, in the end, you still benefit from Apple's original architecture decision for the core of their operating system: An open-source operating system. Full disclosure as to where the bug lives. As you said it, even the OS X server people had to remove the system-installed version and compile their own to not be vulnerable to Denial of Service attacks.

    Be GLAD you were able to do that. Systems administrators who maintain production-environment servers have had OPTIONS as to how to deal with this situation, based on priorities. Sure it would have been nice to let Apple do the work for you. But hey, if you maintain something of importance, you'd better know your way around the operating system you maintain. But since those are all open-source components, chances are there were about 892739847238974 other people who had found a workaround and/or a solution to your problem within hours of the vulnerability being found, and chances are a good chunk of them have shared those solutions with the community at large.

    There is no such thing as a secure operating system. A secure operating system is not connected to any network and doesn't otherwise interact with anything or anybody. Security is a frame of mind, procedures and processes surrounding the usage of computing facilities, and does not exist in an absolute form. Certain practices and philosophies allow administrators to build systems that are more secure than others. But it is all relative.

    Take an off-the-shelf Jaguar installation, install it on a mac, then run nmap on that machine. How many ports will you find open? ZERO. NONE. NADA. ZILCH. not one. Why? How many will you find on windows? 5 to 10 depending on which flavor you're installing.

  62. Lot of Security Fixes by dimmu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Looks like most of the update is Security Fixes in 3rd party software (openssl/openssh/sendmail) instead of a lot of bug fixes and some backports from 10.3.

    Hopefully 10.3 goes gold quickly :)

    --
    -- Cliff Albert
    1. Re:Lot of Security Fixes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently... it already has. Or, at least is very close to it.

    2. Re:Lot of Security Fixes by dimmu · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm know running 10.3 on my iBook for evaluation. If it seems to work out OK, i'll be upgrading my PowerBook to 10.3. Which is still running 10.2.8 for stability as it's my main workstation.

      --
      -- Cliff Albert
  63. Re:What happened to my Airport connection?? by Amiga+Lover · · Score: 0

    Most normal people would have flipped up the keyboard on a TiBook, seen there IS NO FUCKING AIRPORT CARD SLOT THERE then read the instructions on how to do it properly. That is, by unscrewing the base.

  64. Update changes icons but not associations by paranoidsim · · Score: 1

    Did anybody else have this problem? My .docs arent with word anymore, my .txt's are with GoLive 6 and my pdf's finally show adobe. Though none of the original associations changes...

  65. no problems so far by jan.korky · · Score: 0

    installed 10.2.8 on my 17" iMac G4 800 and there were no problems whatsoever. I ran repair permissions, tried the progs I use most, no problem.. my Xbench scores haven't changed.

  66. Re:worst thing was 2 weeks to get ssh/sendmail fix by wilkens · · Score: 1
    And unless you are an Xserve customer with a valid, active support license, Apple doesn't owe you shit. . . . unless you pay Apple, be prepared to wait for a patch.
    I agree with most of the rest of your post, but come on, you don't think I paid Apple for my OS? And that security fixes are part of a paid OS (you say yourself that no OS is secure). And that they should be delivered quickly, especially when they're small and easy on the vendor side? And that it was a bad decision to roll an important security fix into an enormous system-wide update?

    I've been proud of Apple, but this wasn't one of their best moments.

  67. Just flash the Power Manager and it's buddies! by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1

    plug it in, boot holding cmd-option-O-F, when you get to the OpenFirmware prompt type:

    reset-nvram
    reset-all

    some 'flashing' messages will happen and the machine will reboot. discharge the battery fully and then charge it fully. repeat once if needed.

    The iBook batteries are pretty flaky, yours might actually be dead if this doesn't fix it. Call and tell Apple that your battery is dead and send it back, make use of that AppleCare you bought (you did buy it right?).

    --
    "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
  68. So what really happened? by g0at · · Score: 1

    Does anyone have any inside deets on what the major fuck-up was with the first revision?

    I know that bugs are bugs, but I'm particularly curious about what was responsible for the halved battery life. Was there some rogue process factoring random numbers constantly in the background that slipped in, or something?

    -ben

    1. Re:So what really happened? by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      Aside from a handful who probably had batteries that were in the process of failing to begin with, most people apparently did not experience a reduction in actual battery life--just a reduction in battery time estimates.

  69. Re:This fix is great! by mlyle · · Score: 1

    No, you are ignorant.

    Link pulse won't work at all with one set to 10 and one set to 100. A duplex mismatch, on the other hand, will result in one side seeing tons of collisions and subsequent throttling.

  70. Re:worst thing was 2 weeks to get ssh/sendmail fix by tgibbs · · Score: 1

    Most of us installed the first version of 10.2.8. Only those with dual 450's on slow ethernet networks had a problem, and that was easily fixed by swapping out one file.

  71. Re:What happened to my Airport connection?? by tgibbs · · Score: 1
    I got the job as I'm the "Computer Guy" and can generally help friends and family with there computer problems.

    Evidently, you didn't want to endanger your "computer guy" status by actually reading the directions. But I'm sure your friend was very impressed by your extensive but unnecessary disassembly of her Powerbook, and will probably believe you when you blame Apple for the damage that you did. Oh, by the way, the "easily accessed" slot that you were looking for is on the side, just where it is on a PC, and accepts standard PC wireless cards. The Airport card is for people who don't want to be bothered unplugging their wireless card every time they want to to put something else in that slot.

  72. Wow, that's uncanny by RalphBNumbers · · Score: 2, Informative

    Woah, I have a Voodoo II, and an overclocked bus too...
    Something tells me this is not a coincidence.

    I guess I might as well yank the VoodooII, it's not like I can actually use it under OSX anyway. How do you even know it's not shutting down?

    --
    "The worst tyrannies were the ones where a governance required its own logic on every embedded node." - Vernor Vinge
    1. Re:Wow, that's uncanny by Mononoke · · Score: 1
      I guess I might as well yank the VoodooII, it's not like I can actually use it under OSX anyway.
      Sure you can, it just doesn't accelerate anything. Still works as a standard video card just fine.
      How do you even know it's not shutting down?
      It's running my primary monitor. The progress bar animation continues, as long as I don't touch the mouse. I guess part of it could be shutting down somehow.

      The on-board video drops video sync and my second monitor sleeps instantly when it happens.

      --
      NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
  73. Repeated over several mac posts by hexdcml · · Score: 1
    Wow.. this is a proper genuine troll here ;)
    I've seen this posted about 4 times now across several Apple stories.

    Let the flames BEGIN! mwahahaha ;)

    --
    Fight Crime - Shoot Back!
  74. 10.2.8: USB hub in Apple Display failed on reboot by c13v3rm0nk3y · · Score: 1

    May as well chip in with my 2 fractional money units.

    Just applied this update to my Quicksilver 933, and all went reasonably well, though on reboot the keyboard and mouse was unresponsive. Mouse pointer just sat in the upper-left corner, unmoving.

    I had to pull the Apple Display cable out of the back of the unit to reset the USB hub in the display to get the keyboard and mouse attached to work. No biggie, I guess.

    Perhaps it was the DLink USB Bluetooth adapter in the keyboard hub?

    --
    -- clvrmnky
  75. Umm... great? by piecewise · · Score: 1

    So, I'm glad this update fixes Ethernet problems in Dual 500 systems..

    Unfortunately my new eMac still won't restart, shutdown, or logout -- and still have the other problems associated with the original 10.2.8 Update.

    Great work, Apple. Is a not-f*ed up eMac a selling point for buying Panther, now?

    --
    The next comment I write will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
  76. Re:worst thing was 2 weeks to get ssh/sendmail fix by valmont · · Score: 1

    Bah, i understand your and other people's frustration. Heck that made me feel uneasy too. Yes you and I both paid Apple for their OS. But, if you think about it, what you really pay for is an operating system that is more mature and more secure than, say, windows.

    Security fixes, if they really matter, in the end, are the responsibility of the System Administrator. Not Apple. That's the whole point of running an operating system whose core underlying services is open-source software: if you want to be lazy, like I am, you can wait for Apple to release a patch. If security issues surrounding services that are by default not enabled really do matter, then the open-source nature of your operating system enables you to actively seek patches. Think about it, isn't that a valid reason to buy OS X? Having alternatives?

    But yeah, rolling it out as part of a larger upgrade is a bit unfortunate, but again, think about it, those security holes are by no means security holes that would affect any significant portion of their user base, since those services are disabled by default, especially sendmail, for which you MUST use the command line. They were on the brink of releasing a slew of updates as part of 10.2.8, why not roll those security fixes with it? I can't imagine upgrade patches being that cheap to set-up, and any less of a pain in the ass. They've gotta implement patches, package them up, publish detailed release notes to their knowledge base, release the packages to their upgrade servers and all that crazy shit. They're a company with a finite amount of resources, as much as they appear to make every effort to please, gain and retain the trust and interest of their user base, i'm sure it still just made good sense to roll out those particular security fixes as part of a larger upgrade. Also, if you look at the release notes, they call those "Security Enhancements".

    A security fix, to me, would have been, for example, a glaring security hole in safari allowing malicious coders to write a web page that'll sniff out all the cookies you have stored on your machine for many popular domains, such as authentication tokens on Amazon.com. Because, unlike ssh and sendmail, everybody uses a web browser, and most people who use a web browser are not computer geeks who should know about potential risks involved with allowing your machine to listen for incoming connections on any TCP port. Back in the days of 10.1, there was a security hole in Internet Explorer 5.1 for OS X that could allow an attacker to do evil shit using a terminal. That got patched in its own security patch.

  77. Still seems buggy, stay away by a-dong · · Score: 1

    I just installed this on my 12" PB and repaired permissions.

    The update seems very buggy overall. I have encountered the following problems so far:

    - startup time is very long, with very windows-like behavior (i.e. desktop draws very slowly on startup and menus draw bit by bit instead of popping up all at once like before)
    - iTunes skips horribly on files that played fine before
    - Mail.app causes system to freeze up momentarily (spinning beach balls galore)
    - system feels more sluggish and unstable overall.

    I ran top to try to see what the problem was, but I could not see anything obvious. It seems like there is some very bad code somewhere in the update though. I am trying to decide if I should 'downgrade' back to 10.2.6 or just suck it up for a while and wait for 10.3.

    Not recommended.

  78. Re:What happened to my Airport connection?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll bet you ram your fist down your throat when you want to wipe your ass, right? You probably also cut holes in the wall rather than using a doorway. Stupid git.

  79. Uh - NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    I'm installing mine right away, how about you?

    Uh - NO.

    You must be joking.

  80. Flash? by fermion · · Score: 1
    Ok guys, this is a serious question.

    Did anyone else get Flash installed with the update? I notice the update included Safari enhancements, so maybe they included it there.

    It's not that big of a deal. It just took me a while to figure out that I had been infected with the monster. I generally try hard to avoid it, and I am trying to figure out where it came from.

    Does Apple do anything that requires Flash?

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    1. Re:Flash? by dnahelix · · Score: 1

      I had been infected with the monster


      OK, I am asking this honestly and seriously, and do not want to start a Flash vs. No-Flash FlameWar.

      But I will begin by saying I am a Flash developer and use Flash a lot and really like it.

      I would really like to now what the fear is among some Mac users. I have really only seen it on /. and it kind of confuses me, yet does concern me. The plug-ins don't seem to take up much room. I don't know, I don't get it. I would really like you or someone to please plainly and calmly explain to me why they think Flash is bad.

      Some history of my usage...
      I started using Flash when the educational software company I worked for (until a year ago this week) moved from an in-house platform to Flash for web and CD. It was new to everyone there (v.4 at the time) The other Mac users that I worked with seemed to like it a lot, too, and we had fun exploring the things you could do with Actionscripting.

      Presently, now that the company is gone, I'm getting pretty good work doing freelance and contract Flash development, and see a lot of jobs out there doing it.

      As per your question, No, I don't think Apple requires Flash for anything.
      And, btw, the new Flash 7 player seems to speed up performance on slower Macs!

      --
      Slashdot Eds Link Anonymous Posts With Logged Posts
      They Are Vermin Feeding On Each Other's Feces.
      I Hate \.
    2. Re:Flash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      OK, I'll bite. Flash is a good tool. I have seen some good development. There is no fear of flash. Only a disdain at the push architecture on the web and the oft noted violations of web standards. It is just like IE. I do not fear it, but only the self-serving chaos that it propagates.

      There are two issues. The first is the web page. Everything else on a web page I can pretty much control. I can choose to load or not load images, and then choose to allow them to animate or not. I can even choose which servers I want to accept or not accept images. I can usually control if a window gets popped up, and if it does whether the controls can be disabled, it can be hidden, or resized. I can control my own style-sheets so that if a sever is doing something silly, like not setting font in such a way that I can read them on my mac, I can fix that. On the other hand if i hit a flash page it just goes. It downloads the flash, plays it, and I have to close the page to stop it. I don't know about the flash security model, so i am also a bit hesitant about running unknown content on my machine.

      The second issue is the independent flash applications. These are good. If I knowingly download content, or buy content, then I am saying i trust it. I can't run in my browser because I do not have the plug in, but it seems I have run such applications outside of the browser. Of course I suspect these development do not generate the revenue for Macromedia that the web pages do.

      An extra issue is lame intro pages that form a silly barrier of entry and do not index well on google. I understand their use by a few inexperienced users and artists types, but not by supposedly professional businesses. It is not Macromedia fault any more than poorly designed web pages are the fault of W3C, but the lack of a default browser control sequence is.

    3. Re:Flash? by trouser · · Score: 1

      Most browsers allow you to disable Java and Javascript. It'd be nice if that extended to all plug-ins. I'd love to see an end to lame intro pages but I see no point in a life without StrongBad.

      --
      Now wash your hands.
    4. Re:Flash? by dnahelix · · Score: 1

      You change your MIME settings on how to handle .swf files, right?

      As per the argument about bad design, well you might as well get rid of HTML, too.

      --
      Slashdot Eds Link Anonymous Posts With Logged Posts
      They Are Vermin Feeding On Each Other's Feces.
      I Hate \.
    5. Re:Flash? by erwass · · Score: 1
      I would really like you or someone to please plainly and calmly explain to me why they think Flash is bad.
      I don't think Flash itself is "bad". However, I disabled Flash on my windows box for one simple reason. For my particular usage pattern it seems to only facilitate the presentation of garish ads. I'm thankful that (unlike IE on Windows) Safari lets you choose to be Flash-free without constantly irritating you with dialogs trying to get you to download the plugin.
  81. Just one more report by Vaidd · · Score: 1

    I just got an iMac 1.25 GHz, and since it seemed the majority of the problems reported were on iMacs, I held off on the 10.2.8 update. Today, with much trepidation, I installed the update, and I haven't had any problems with mysteriously changing icons, crashes, running programs or network connectivity (yet).

    For whatever it's worth.

  82. Beige G3 desktop freezing randomly with 10.2.8 by t-maxx+cowboy · · Score: 1

    I have a Beige G3 desktop that is freezing with 10.2.8 installed. It doesn't seem to matter what I do, the freeze is actualy the screen going black and no drive activity nothing.
    At first it showed up only in Safari, then it happened in Disk Copy, and now if I try and use Toast 6. Short of reinstalling OS back to 10.2.6, I don't know what I can try.

    --
    Regards,

    Ryan Pritchard
    Fun Extends All Basic Life Expectancies
  83. G5 gets 14.0MB extra... by mbathgate · · Score: 1
    It seems as though Apple used the opportunity of re-releasing 10.2.8 to throw in some extra goodies for the G5, since it shows up as "10.2.8(G5)" in Software Update, and I managed to install the original 10.2.8 before they pulled it...
    The 10.2.8 (G5) Update delivers enhanced functionality and improved reliability for the following applications, services and technologies: AirPort, Bluetooth, LDAP, and FireWire and USB device compatibility. The update also provides updated security services and includes the latest Security Updates.
    --
    If you post, they will mod it.
  84. Re:This fix is great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You must be the d00d who took tin snips to his girlfriend's titanium laptop.

    Here's a tip, next time take the bottom off.

  85. No Problems by valkraider · · Score: 1

    I just felt the need to post because of all the noise in here.

    I applied the original update to an iMac DVSE 500Mhz G3, and an iMac G4800 superdrive. Neither machine had any problems that I could notice, and none of the problems that I read about.

    I have applied the new 10.2.8 to both machines with success as well, and as yet no adverse side effects that I can note.

    Strangely, I just recieved my brand new 1Ghz 12' AlBook, and it came with 10.2.7 installed - which I had thought was just for G5s? I have updated it to the new 10.2.8 with no problems that I can tell.

    All is well in Appleville for this little resident...

  86. "You sawed the back of WHAT?!?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=951 33

    It took a few minutes to find. The only tool you require is a screwdriver (or torx, depending on the model).

    Your friend used the wrong 'tool'.

    Off topic: Living in your parents basement, playing quake and downloading porn does not make you a 'computer guy'. I bet you've got a t-shirt too.

    1. Re:"You sawed the back of WHAT?!?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that should be artnum=95133, don't know why it put a space in. :/

  87. 10.2.8 fixes hung Classic startup by basho3 · · Score: 1

    This update fixes what was a serious useability problem on my iMac 700, previous update 10.2.6. None of the recommended Classic mode configuration tweaks (turn off extensions, install in a separate partition etc.) fixed what was a disruptive behavior.

    Casual observation indicates speed of Classic applications (app startup, Pagemaker redraws) is dramatically improved.

    Yay!

  88. 10.2.8 Software Update on G4 results in boot fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Accepted Software Update's 10.2.8 package.
    Rebooted as suggested.
    Got grey Apple logo on light-grey background, which after a while, turned to a grey circle-slash logo on light-grey background. System was locked, had to pull the power cord.

    Disconnected FireWire external drive, powered up the Mac, same symptom.

    Tried booting from 10.2.6 install CD, same thing.

    Rebooted, went into Open Firmware, did a reset-nvram and a reset-all. System rebooted, same circle-slash.

    The Mac is a G4/450, 512MB RAM, two 10-GB IDE HDs.
    It was running 10.2.6 and various seeds of Panther without problem.

    Fortunately, my data lives on our network, but quite annoying.

  89. Same 10.2.8 G3-Beige problem by Lord+Satri · · Score: 1

    Hi RalphB - Same problem here. Your email is not on /., can you reach me on alexandre@leroux.net please, I'd like to know more about your 10.2.8 problems and if you succeeded in repairs. Thanks a lot ! :-)