You're confused. I could careless if you get all your music from P2P.
What I'm saying is that collecting as much music as you can, more than you can reasonably listen to and apreciate, is in my opinion an analog to people who die with their house stacked full of newspapers dating back to the 50's. I believe that it is a sign of a compulsive disorder.
I can't believe you brought out the definition of hoard on me like that. No need to get nasty. What are you going to do next, point out that I misspelled it?
Remember the operative word in that definition is or which means that it can mean either of the two things.
You do bring up the vaild point that all the music you have is just soo wonderfull and you love it all and you just can't find enough time to listen to it all. And that might certainly be the case.
However, it is my opinion that you and many people like you collect much much more music than you reasonably need to. You're obviously not as bad a case as the subjects of the article though.
I'm the same way when it comes to music. Another thing I've noticed is that as soon as I come up with a playlist of songs, say anywhere from 20 to 40 songs. with in days I become completely sick of every single song on the playlist and can't listen to it at all.
but then when I go to my entire library to listen to music, I find myself skipping ahead incesently because of all the over played stuff.
I'm not saying that you have to pay attention to your music the whole time you're listening to it.
Maybe I'm just neurotic and I pay attention to background music and it bugs me when I hear stuff I don't like. That doesn't mean that my musical taste is limited. Its just my preference.
I'd also say that if you take a person who listens to music passivly and asked them to sit down and pay attention to their music and pick out the music that they like when tehy pay attention to it that it would be less.
Um, ok thanks for sharing. Really, I wasn't talking about your suposed friends, I was talking about the loser in the article.
My musical taste really isn't all that limited. I like lots of different kinds of music. Just not very many songs from each.
I'd really like to see play counts for the songs of people who have 200 gigs of music. In addition to that I'd like to see how much they actually pay attention to the music they're listening to.
Bush: Lets talk strategery Kerry: STFU N00b I'll pwn y0u in naaahhm! Bush: Don't make me go Halliburton on your ass.... . ... . As if either of these guys are in touch with reality. All you're gonna get is canned answers from the campaign droids.
Slashdot Mirror
Lemme guess. This is all about how the Republicans are going to steal the election... Again.
Oh Please.
Big suprise.
Politics aside, he got what he diserved.
Sorry I almost forgot to add, that its a submission to slashdot for crying out loud.
Did you even read the fucking article?
What if you only have one Keyboard Mouse and Monitor?
Is there software that when I move the mouse to the edge of the screen takes control of a specific machine AND displays its screen?
If you can't do the animation with a gif, now days people jus use flash.
You obviously don't understand the scope of the audience.
You're confused. I could careless if you get all your music from P2P.
What I'm saying is that collecting as much music as you can, more than you can reasonably listen to and apreciate, is in my opinion an analog to people who die with their house stacked full of newspapers dating back to the 50's. I believe that it is a sign of a compulsive disorder.
I'd prefer sirens and flashing LEDs.
I can't believe you brought out the definition of hoard on me like that. No need to get nasty. What are you going to do next, point out that I misspelled it?
Remember the operative word in that definition is or which means that it can mean either of the two things.
You do bring up the vaild point that all the music you have is just soo wonderfull and you love it all and you just can't find enough time to listen to it all. And that might certainly be the case.
However, it is my opinion that you and many people like you collect much much more music than you reasonably need to. You're obviously not as bad a case as the subjects of the article though.
Personally, I don't like hording crap.
I'm the same way when it comes to music. Another thing I've noticed is that as soon as I come up with a playlist of songs, say anywhere from 20 to 40 songs. with in days I become completely sick of every single song on the playlist and can't listen to it at all.
but then when I go to my entire library to listen to music, I find myself skipping ahead incesently because of all the over played stuff.
I'm not interested in the list, I'm interested in the play count.
do you listen to it ALL regularly? In a giant playlist?
I bet there is a lot of the music that you haven't listened to in months, and probably years.
I'm not saying that you have to pay attention to your music the whole time you're listening to it.
Maybe I'm just neurotic and I pay attention to background music and it bugs me when I hear stuff I don't like. That doesn't mean that my musical taste is limited. Its just my preference.
I'd also say that if you take a person who listens to music passivly and asked them to sit down and pay attention to their music and pick out the music that they like when tehy pay attention to it that it would be less.
Um, ok thanks for sharing. Really, I wasn't talking about your suposed friends, I was talking about the loser in the article.
My musical taste really isn't all that limited. I like lots of different kinds of music. Just not very many songs from each.
I'd really like to see play counts for the songs of people who have 200 gigs of music. In addition to that I'd like to see how much they actually pay attention to the music they're listening to.
I have serious trouble filling a 10th of an iPod with music I can stand.
Its seriously sad that these people are just massing huge collections of crap to trade simply for the purpose of being "in the club" what a waste.
It if were all porn that would be unerstandable, but just music and movies? Come on people.
Too bad games pretty much suck lately. I can't remember the last time I saw a game worth spending money on. Starcraft maybe.
Bush: Lets talk strategery ... ..
Kerry: STFU N00b I'll pwn y0u in naaahhm!
Bush: Don't make me go Halliburton on your ass.
.
.
.
As if either of these guys are in touch with reality. All you're gonna get is canned answers from the campaign droids.
Atoms moving in formation is nothing new.
Atoms usually move in formation. You know when you throw a ball, or drop a hammer on your foot. WTF?
Still no cure for cancer. Still no flying cars.
See! I knew it they're in bed with the virus makers! And Halliburton too I bet!
m
Its not hard to find the connections, you just have to google them!
http://www.commondreams.org/news2004/0310-11.ht
Seriously, someone needs to make a game called 6 degrees of Halliburton. That would rock.
Ask for people's opinion get modded interesting, state one of your own and get modded troll. Interesting :)
Probably not too bad for the Jr. High crowd though. Where is the good Sci Fi for grown-ups?
Despite thousands of people wanting to see the trailer, it still looks like complete crap.
We obviously need this
I'm married. I do about double that rate of mistakes.