So you fancy her cos she's a "sexy blonde" in a "tight skirt". Would it make any difference at all what colour her skirt was? (And transparent doesn't count!)
You know... there is a version of Apache for Windows... that argument isn't very valid.
Yep, I know. There's Apache, MySQL and PHP for Windows. And then the question is why, if you're running any of those on Windows, why not run them on the platform type they were written for? Why would anyone run Apache, MySQL, PHP and Windows? It just doesn't make sense. Unless the person running it is too scared to get involved in Linux.
Yeah but....
When someone comes to me and says:
"Windows did........ last night, and really pissed me off - I'd like to give that Linux a try - where can I get it from?", it's handy to give them the 3 RedHat ISOs, hand it to them, and say "Boot from the CD".
No dodgy 6 floppy Debian installs, no faffing around with downloading stages for Gentoo (although it's my fav distro for anyone that knows about Linux). Just let RedHats very friendly installer hold their hand all the way through, ask them all the right questions, set up their XFree86, and network cards etc.
And that, my friends, is why people think Linux == Redhat, and not SuSE. SuSE might be great. I don't know - I've never used it. Gentoo 1st, RedHat 2nd, Debian for old slow machines 3rd in my book. Flame away Debian fans:)
Fair point. But most stuff that finds its way into my networks is stuff that I've discovered, learnt well, and grown to trust at home first. Why would I try out a distro on a server at work that I've never used before?
If you can't download an ISO, that instantly rules out a large chunk of the potential users. And I don't mean some run from CD wierdness - if I want that I'll use Knoppix.
Good lord. Have you tried out, or even heard of, kernel security patches? www.grsecurity.com, www.lids.org, and the selinux stuff that the NSA is helping out with to name a few. I have. Please, for the sake of your IPv6consultancy reputation, stop digging yourself a hole.
Shakes head. What do they teach kids at school these days?
What? Did you even try it out? root is root because it's uid 0, not because it's called root. SSH in, try it out, and shut up with stupid comments until you know more.
Thanks.
Erm, it's the best equivalent. Both allow you full access to all the functions of both OSs. You think that ssh as root is in someway more secure than running a full X session? (Apart from being able to snoop on the X session)
Internet conencted Linux versus Windows servers? I'd say there were more Linux ones.
I started off admining Windows. I was good at it. Then I discovered Linux, and started getting interested in it.
I don't write code as shell scripts work well in most situations. And if I did, it would be with ssh, vi, and gcc.
As for securing your Windows boxes, I'll always admit it is possible to secure them enough. Keeping them secured is a full time job though. When was the last time that a release version of Apache allowed someone on the net to run commands on the webserver? What about those../../../cmd.exe exploits in IIS? That's just the lamest thing ever. I suggest you sign up to NTBugtraq, and understand why some of us aren't exactly singing Windows' praises.
Install Windows 2000 Advanced Server, and enable Terminal Services. Then post the IP address along with Administrator login, and password, and let Slashdot at it. Scared? ssh root@selinux.dev.gentoo.org with password gentoo then.
Hypothermal dumbells? Cold weights? You guys are all off your heads, or are on crack, or something. Start speaking some sense here please. Slashdot used to be a great site back in the 80s.
Linux is a character in Charlie Brown? I don't know why you'd say that. Lihnux doesn't sound like Lienus at all. It could only be confusing if you say it wrong.
Even people that don't know anything about computers know that Linux is that "other thing" that's "more secure". I know which would be my chosen OS to run any kind of internetwork-connected services. And it's not Windows.
It's not 128 digits. You can shorten them. 127.0.0.1 now is::1. Also, you make zeroes redundant. 2001::1 is a valid address, as is 2001:618:15:f3fa:223c:c0fd:88dd:103f
Slashdot Mirror
hah! If Linus was truely great, he'd have fixed it, and brought it back up too! Save that uptime!
5. Get a celebrity most people have ever heard of.
So you fancy her cos she's a "sexy blonde" in a "tight skirt". Would it make any difference at all what colour her skirt was? (And transparent doesn't count!)
You know... there is a version of Apache for Windows... that argument isn't very valid. Yep, I know. There's Apache, MySQL and PHP for Windows. And then the question is why, if you're running any of those on Windows, why not run them on the platform type they were written for? Why would anyone run Apache, MySQL, PHP and Windows? It just doesn't make sense. Unless the person running it is too scared to get involved in Linux.
Yeah but.... ........ last night, and really pissed me off - I'd like to give that Linux a try - where can I get it from?", it's handy to give them the 3 RedHat ISOs, hand it to them, and say "Boot from the CD".
:)
When someone comes to me and says:
"Windows did
No dodgy 6 floppy Debian installs, no faffing around with downloading stages for Gentoo (although it's my fav distro for anyone that knows about Linux). Just let RedHats very friendly installer hold their hand all the way through, ask them all the right questions, set up their XFree86, and network cards etc.
And that, my friends, is why people think Linux == Redhat, and not SuSE. SuSE might be great. I don't know - I've never used it. Gentoo 1st, RedHat 2nd, Debian for old slow machines 3rd in my book. Flame away Debian fans
Fair point. But most stuff that finds its way into my networks is stuff that I've discovered, learnt well, and grown to trust at home first. Why would I try out a distro on a server at work that I've never used before?
If you can't download an ISO, that instantly rules out a large chunk of the potential users. And I don't mean some run from CD wierdness - if I want that I'll use Knoppix.
Good lord. Have you tried out, or even heard of, kernel security patches? www.grsecurity.com, www.lids.org, and the selinux stuff that the NSA is helping out with to name a few. I have. Please, for the sake of your IPv6consultancy reputation, stop digging yourself a hole.
Shakes head. What do they teach kids at school these days?
What? Did you even try it out? root is root because it's uid 0, not because it's called root. SSH in, try it out, and shut up with stupid comments until you know more.
Thanks.
Erm, it's the best equivalent. Both allow you full access to all the functions of both OSs. You think that ssh as root is in someway more secure than running a full X session? (Apart from being able to snoop on the X session)
I'm sure you know this already.u x/kernel/SillySounds/
http://wuarchive.wustl.edu/mirrors/kernel.org/lin
Lee-nucks. Which is how someone would say Lihnux with a longer i.
No I'm not clueless.
../../../cmd.exe exploits in IIS? That's just the lamest thing ever. I suggest you sign up to NTBugtraq, and understand why some of us aren't exactly singing Windows' praises.
Internet conencted Linux versus Windows servers? I'd say there were more Linux ones.
I started off admining Windows. I was good at it. Then I discovered Linux, and started getting interested in it.
I don't write code as shell scripts work well in most situations. And if I did, it would be with ssh, vi, and gcc.
As for securing your Windows boxes, I'll always admit it is possible to secure them enough. Keeping them secured is a full time job though. When was the last time that a release version of Apache allowed someone on the net to run commands on the webserver? What about those
Install Windows 2000 Advanced Server, and enable Terminal Services. Then post the IP address along with Administrator login, and password, and let Slashdot at it.
Scared? ssh root@selinux.dev.gentoo.org with password gentoo then.
Hypothermal dumbells? Cold weights? You guys are all off your heads, or are on crack, or something. Start speaking some sense here please. Slashdot used to be a great site back in the 80s.
Linux is a character in Charlie Brown? I don't know why you'd say that. Lihnux doesn't sound like Lienus at all. It could only be confusing if you say it wrong.
Even people that don't know anything about computers know that Linux is that "other thing" that's "more secure". I know which would be my chosen OS to run any kind of internetwork-connected services. And it's not Windows.
Looks like it might be a mouse-over form?
u rn true;" onClick="flagRun=1;procreate();playBall();return true;">u rn true;">
<input type="submit" value="CLICK ME" name="CLICK ME" onMouseOver="flagRun=1;procreate();playBall();ret
<img src="/pooped.jpg" onMouseOver="flagRun=1;procreate();playBall();ret
Yeah, I have popups blocked in IE, but yet I got parrotcock.jpg come up.
To find out, wget it and less the page. That way your eyeballs won't bleed.
He didn't say anything about asdf.com - what are you talking about? Are you reading the same post as me?
Well, if that's the case I want a /22 of IPv4 for my own personal network. Oh, I can't have it? Whyever not?
Horrific link. Mod down, and do not visit.
It's not 128 digits. You can shorten them. 127.0.0.1 now is ::1. Also, you make zeroes redundant. 2001::1 is a valid address, as is 2001:618:15:f3fa:223c:c0fd:88dd:103f
Good troll though.
Which P2P app is that? I've tried quite a few, but that port doesn't look familiar.
Size? Or is it just the sheer quantity that is satifying?
Freak. It compiles in another location on the filesystem, and then only copies once the build/compile is complete.
Ignore the idiots - and give it a try. I did, and it rocks.