I wonder what makes us so sure that Britney Spears' ass is NOT hairy. Has anyone on/. even seen her ass and is able to vouch that it is in fact hair free?
I do not recommend ingesting Starband. However, if you must, heavy amounts of ketchup and/or other condiments may help improve the taste.
I would also suggest nutritional supplements to help fulfill your dietary needs.
Obviously you prefer to just throw insults rather than actually think and agrue something like this.
Read any of the hundreds of probably redundant posts as to why this really is a bad thing(tm).
I actually agree with the subject line here. At a rough guess, I'ld say approximately 75-80% of the comments I've read on this story during the past several hours have all been reactionary rubbish.
The "hundreds of probably redundant posts" should have the following words inserted..."clueless, ignorant, naive, etc." to make it read more like "hundreds of probably redundant, ignorant, and cluelessly idiotic posts expressing how naive the posters are". Only because of those reactionary rubbish posts mentioned above, pretty much all of them are resulting from the poster having no clue what they are talking about other than their ignorance based belief that anything "nuke" is bad, therefore they must move to a third world country to get away from such policy.
Which by the way is not "policy" as anyone who read any news article that this whole commentary is based on would know. Read the following...
The Pentagon has been presenting these reviews before congress since WWII every six years as required BY LAW
...not as a result of the current administration's policy. There is nothing new here. This news is over 50 years old, older than the vast majority of/. readership.
And if you believe that Russia, or China, or any other nation with a military strong enough to expand its borders doesn't have contingiency plans for what to do IF this or IF that happens in regards to other nations, regardless of how "friendly" the relationship currently is, than you are the biggest fool.
The specifics of the clause that you term "whenever" aren't at all defining a "whenever" clause. What that third part is there for is to cover cases similar in nature to the first two clauses, but aren't definable because the means of delivery/attack are unknown in the present time and terminology.
For example, if some rogue nation brought an attack against the US using a new technology that resulted in damage similar to any currently known weapon of mass destruction. This third clause covers those contingiencies.
You have to remember that this report gets compiled by law every six years, and in todays rate of change in technology, six years is a long time to have to make your report forward compatible for.
I love this idea too! As for the lack of marketting ability, and stability for displaying on a store shelf...Just publish them with ring binding holes, with the "marketting" materials on a front and back sheet, and shrink-wrap it tightly. Let us geeks put them in our own binders.
I would definitely buy techie and self-teach and reference books in this format, especially if the price was a bit cheaper because their was no real binding cost to the publisher.
I agree with your assessment that the newspaper article just trashed the chumps chances.
Talk about the straw that broke the camel's back. I think this could be a straw 3 times the weight of the camel, and I wouldn't be surprised if the chump goes postal.
Not that he ultimately has anyone to blame but his own self.
Slashdot Mirror
I wonder what makes us so sure that Britney Spears' ass is NOT hairy. Has anyone on /. even seen her ass and is able to vouch that it is in fact hair free?
I do not recommend ingesting Starband. However, if you must, heavy amounts of ketchup and/or other condiments may help improve the taste. I would also suggest nutritional supplements to help fulfill your dietary needs.
All Your Pigeon Are Belong To Us!
Obviously you prefer to just throw insults rather than actually think and agrue something like this.
/. readership.
Read any of the hundreds of probably redundant posts as to why this really is a bad thing(tm).
I actually agree with the subject line here. At a rough guess, I'ld say approximately 75-80% of the comments I've read on this story during the past several hours have all been reactionary rubbish.
The "hundreds of probably redundant posts" should have the following words inserted..."clueless, ignorant, naive, etc." to make it read more like "hundreds of probably redundant, ignorant, and cluelessly idiotic posts expressing how naive the posters are". Only because of those reactionary rubbish posts mentioned above, pretty much all of them are resulting from the poster having no clue what they are talking about other than their ignorance based belief that anything "nuke" is bad, therefore they must move to a third world country to get away from such policy.
Which by the way is not "policy" as anyone who read any news article that this whole commentary is based on would know. Read the following...
The Pentagon has been presenting these reviews before congress since WWII every six years as required BY LAW
...not as a result of the current administration's policy. There is nothing new here. This news is over 50 years old, older than the vast majority of
And if you believe that Russia, or China, or any other nation with a military strong enough to expand its borders doesn't have contingiency plans for what to do IF this or IF that happens in regards to other nations, regardless of how "friendly" the relationship currently is, than you are the biggest fool.
The specifics of the clause that you term "whenever" aren't at all defining a "whenever" clause. What that third part is there for is to cover cases similar in nature to the first two clauses, but aren't definable because the means of delivery/attack are unknown in the present time and terminology. For example, if some rogue nation brought an attack against the US using a new technology that resulted in damage similar to any currently known weapon of mass destruction. This third clause covers those contingiencies. You have to remember that this report gets compiled by law every six years, and in todays rate of change in technology, six years is a long time to have to make your report forward compatible for.
I would definitely buy techie and self-teach and reference books in this format, especially if the price was a bit cheaper because their was no real binding cost to the publisher.
I agree with your assessment that the newspaper article just trashed the chumps chances.
Talk about the straw that broke the camel's back. I think this could be a straw 3 times the weight of the camel, and I wouldn't be surprised if the chump goes postal.
Not that he ultimately has anyone to blame but his own self.