Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft To Exhibit at LinuxWorld Expo

Earendil writes "Linux Today has a confirmed report that Microsoft is going to be an exhibitor at LinuxWorld Expo. One can only guess at what Microsoft's motives might be. It will be interesting to see the reaction to the appearance of a Microsoft booth." No doubt this means that the more childish among us will make us all look bad. Sigh.

756 comments

  1. What's the exhibit? by Nijika · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh oh, I know, a broadcast floos of NetBIOS and ActiveDNS requests on the exhibitors LAN!!!

    --
    Luck favors the prepared, darling.
    1. Re:What's the exhibit? by GodInHell · · Score: 2, Interesting

      FUD, .net, their 'rent our code' initiative, and of course, details about their enterprise wide lisencing schemas in order to properly confuse education IT pros and such forth that are finally looking at an open source solutions as a sincere posilbility.

      There are some things I fear though;
      1) A MS Distro with proprietary libraries and a proprietary office product
      2) officially renting a floor space in order to be able to make official complaints regarding the 'competitions' advertising practices.
      3) They want to Buy you. Not win you over, not get you to trust them, straight up, here's a free copy of XP, try it out. I've seen this at the chicago CIO conference, where it was brutally succesful.

      Of course.. we all know what will really beat MS in the long run, better pr0n harvesting utilities... at least if the succesful net sites are anything to go by.

      -GiH
      Foot, meet mouth, mouth mrrphrmmm...

    2. Re:What's the exhibit? by JordoCrouse · · Score: 3, Insightful

      3) They want to Buy you. Not win you over, not get you to trust them, straight up, here's a free copy of XP, try it out. I've seen this at the chicago CIO conference, where it was brutally succesful.

      Not to offend you, but your average CIO would be won over by one of those pens with a the lady whose clothes disappear when it is clicked. A CIO confrence is a long shot away from LinuxWorld.

      And anyway, whats wrong with free copies of XP? Most hacker and porters I know end up needing a copy of Windows anway, and I would much rather receive a free copy than have to pay $100, know what I'm saying?

      --
      Do you have Linux and a DotPal? Click here now!
    3. Re:What's the exhibit? by zdzichu · · Score: 1

      > here's a free copy of XP, try it out.

      I'd like to be there, ge this free copy, run few meters and kick winXP like soccer ball.

      --
      :wq
    4. Re:What's the exhibit? by DutchSter · · Score: 2
      3) They want to Buy you. Not win you over, not get you to trust them, straight up, here's a free copy of XP, try it out. I've seen this at the chicago CIO conference, where it was brutally succesful.
      Nothing beats when they came to my college for a .Net dropoff. Total retail value of what each participant got was over $1,200 bucks. Everyone got a fully licensed version of XP Pro, .Net Pro, Office XP Pro, for starters. All the departments were given XP Server, and the school got XP Enterprise Server (or whatever the top end version is).

      Sad thing is, 95% of the people went strictly for the free software. I went because I was interested in how .NET worked (I wasn't overly impressed). Everyone else was just there for the free stuff. Heck, even more than 75% of those that weren't CS majors. Even if they threw .NET out, they still made out like bandits.

      MS: *Bink* :)
    5. Re:What's the exhibit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sweet jebus!

      Where can I get one of those pens

    6. Re:What's the exhibit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is like some horrible Ethyl Baines movie!

    7. Re:What's the exhibit? by JPriest · · Score: 1
      "1) A MS Distro with proprietary libraries and a proprietary office product"

      You think MS might be showing up to release a linux distro? No way, I'm sure there reason for being there probably has everything to do with .NET and the server market. .NET is a framework that IS available to more platforms than just windows. MS support for those other platforms is minimal but it will get em in the door at the expo, the other reason they will be there will probably be to push its "automated administration tools".

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    8. Re:What's the exhibit? by flacco · · Score: 2
      Nothing beats when they came to my college for a .Net dropoff. Total retail value of what each participant got was over $1,200 bucks. Everyone got a fully licensed version of XP Pro, .Net Pro, Office XP Pro, for starters. All the departments were given XP Server, and the school got XP Enterprise Server

      Whas it the intravenous kind or the smokeable kind?

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    9. Re:What's the exhibit? by thegoldenear · · Score: 1

      "Sad thing is, 95% of the people went strictly for the free software."
      and whats wrong with that?

      there's no such thing as XP Server, the latest is 2000 Server and the next will be .NET Server

    10. Re:What's the exhibit? by thelinuxjunkie · · Score: 1

      I would imagine this will be for first hand sight of what they might go after next with a DMCA law suit.

      The thought of a MS version of wine, or emulation layer isn't so bad. I like wine a lot, but I still can't get it to do what I want. And I don't own a copy of windows, but I do have some games. So a MS emulator might not be too bad, atleast until wine works better.

      --
      "A free society is one where it is safe to be unpopular" --Adlai Stevenson
    11. Re:What's the exhibit? by GodInHell · · Score: 1

      Nothing beats when they came to my college for a .Net dropoff. Total retail value of what each participant got was over $1,200 bucks. Everyone got a fully licensed version of XP Pro, .Net Pro, Office XP Pro, for starters. All the departments were given XP Server, and the school got XP Enterprise Server (or whatever the top end version is).

      And thereby they one. Those people are now accustomed to MS widgets and thoughtforms, and will be resistant to migration, moreso through each generation of adaptation.

      -GiH
      Whiskey, a technological invention that whisks you off to a land of happiness and faeries, afterwards returning you home without your key.

    12. Re:What's the exhibit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems like they are right across from the CodeWeaver's booth. so you might be right in the DCMA comment.
      Who knows, maby they just want to fling doo-doo at the CodeWeavers's team and howl like hurt monkeys... With MS, you never know.

    13. Re:What's the exhibit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, there was such a beast as XP server. The included it in technet for a while, I suppose they changed the name.

    14. Re:What's the exhibit? by Vikki_R. · · Score: 1
      1) A MS Distro with proprietary libraries and a proprietary office product

      Oh, you mean something like this, perhaps? :P

    15. Re:What's the exhibit? by Vikki_R. · · Score: 1
      Hell, I'd like to see that. Especially if you can kick it into the booth.

      GOAL!

      :)

    16. Re:What's the exhibit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, at the end of the expo, everyone who got a free copy of XP gathers together and burns them in a big bonfire ;)

    17. Re:What's the exhibit? by messiertom · · Score: 1

      Would you believe some people actually believe that's for real? I won 2 years payment for a domain name from a bet on that :))

    18. Re:What's the exhibit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, maybe someone could bring a microwave oven along. Just set it up next to the Microsoft booth....

    19. Re:What's the exhibit? by loply · · Score: 1

      MS have allready been handing out samples of their OS to the expo's organisers:

      NETCRAFT

      As you can see, the guys were so chuffed with NT4, they moved the website to it!

  2. yay by maukdaddy · · Score: 1

    This will actually be very good! Just wait.

    1. Re:yay by unhooked · · Score: 1

      For Microsoft, can you think of a better place to
      put a sniffer?

  3. Their display will consist of... by gosand · · Score: 5, Funny

    No doubt that their display will consist of Linux running on an Xbox.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    1. Re:Their display will consist of... by alexburke · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Malda, we need to be able to mod absolute gems like this up to at least 10.

      Good work. I'm still drying off my eyes!

    2. Re:Their display will consist of... by garcia · · Score: 1, Troll

      unfortunatly they can beat out Sony by giving it away for free :(

    3. Re:Their display will consist of... by dimator · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Dude, that was funny to you? I think it was pathetic, and only got the +5 Funny via "group think" moderators.

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    4. Re:Their display will consist of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey-- they're losing lots of money on manufacturing and selling-at-loss the x-box.. they need to recoup those costs somehow.

      At least this way they get $200,000

    5. Re:Their display will consist of... by killmenow · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and they'll be collecting that $200,000 too.

      Far be it from Microsoft to leave money on the table.

    6. Re:Their display will consist of... by Khalid · · Score: 5, Funny

      They probably want to win the 200000 $ grant :)

    7. Re:Their display will consist of... by brain-in-a-box · · Score: 1

      No doubt that their display will consist of Linux running on an Xbox.
      But not for long.
      Sony will shut them down after one day.

      --
      You are the dot in slashdot !
    8. Re:Their display will consist of... by vakselse · · Score: 1

      ...of a shiny new Linux distribution!

      Seriously, why else would they have a stand there?

      A Linux distribution from Microsoft could be a formidable competitor to the existing distributions in the server market. And wouldn't it would be the perfect market strategy attacking from the inside?

    9. Re:Their display will consist of... by snilloc · · Score: 2

      It's not so much that they need the $200k, but much more important that they take away the monetary incentive for production of Linux on XBox.

    10. Re:Their display will consist of... by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      Microsoft could make Linux run on the X-Box for well under $200,000 in investment.

      To collect the $200,000 prize, they would have to release said code under the GPL.

    11. Re:Their display will consist of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not?

      This way they would double the sales of X-Box.

      Big thing considering PR only.

      And after a year, MS would collect huge
      revenues from sold games - from the same
      wannabies.

    12. Re:Their display will consist of... by egghat · · Score: 1

      Hey, that would be the first MS makes money with the XBox ;-) So this might really happen ...

      Bye egghat

      --
      -- "As a human being I claim the right to be widely inconsistent", John Peel
  4. I don't really get it by iONiUM · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's a linux expo? I mean, I have nothing against Microsoft, but I'm pretty damn sure they don't have a linux distrobution (God forbid the day of a "Microsoft Linux").
    Anyways, I guess they're just going to try to show the competition.... but that makes absolutely NO sense because, again, it's a LINUX EXPO.

    1. Re:I don't really get it by zootread · · Score: 1

      "Microsoft Linux" would be fine, as long as everything they add is licensed under the GPL.

      --
      Zoot!
    2. Re:I don't really get it by Farmer+Jimbo · · Score: 1

      "Microsoft Linux"

      You realize that this is inevitable though?

    3. Re:I don't really get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have nothing against Microsoft
      ...
      God forbid the day of a "Microsoft Linux"

      anyone else see the contradiction?

    4. Re:I don't really get it by iONiUM · · Score: 1

      You missed my point.
      I don't have a problem with Microsoft, but if they release a Linux version then they're going to just try to monopolise it. Personally, I like debian, redhat, slackware, the many choices... I'd rather they stay with what they're doing, and leave the open sourcers to themselves.

    5. Re:I don't really get it by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 5, Funny
      ""Microsoft Linux" You realize that this is inevitable though?"

      Haven't you heard the news?

    6. Re:I don't really get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Microsoft Linux"

      You realize that this is inevitable though?
      <speculation>If I were microsoft, and I were announcing a linux distro, where would I debut it?</speculation>
    7. Re:I don't really get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...Anyways, I guess they're just going to try to show the competition...

      Anybody want to take bets their demo machines will all be Win2K/XP desktops running Services for UNIX? They will try to sell any reps for big companies who do not want to migrate their desktops away from Windows and onto Linux, yet need more interoperability with their UNIX enterprise servers. And at only $99 (retail) to tack on to each Windows license already in use, what a bargain!

    8. Re:I don't really get it by Destoo · · Score: 0

      Ouch.. That penguin looks sick! someone give him some colors!

      this is a spoof site, right? Please?

      --
      Nouvelles de jeux et technologies en français. TC
    9. Re:I don't really get it by bluethundr · · Score: 1

      The thought of GNU licensing may gave Microsoft a bad case of the hives, but interestingly enough at one point they had their own Redmond-grown version of UNIX known as Xenix . It even ran on 386s back in the day.

      But I believe that it was out at about the same time that Linux was just getting off the ground and of course MS wanted money for their wares...so Xenix, as I understand it, died a very quiet death...


      --
      Quod scripsi, scripsi.
    10. Re:I don't really get it by Warped-Reality · · Score: 1

      Just a thought... perhaps they're there just to piss people off, they can record those idiots that walk by, flip them off, swear at them, throw stuffed tuxes, and use it as anti-linux PR.

      --
      This is not the greatest sig in the world, no. This is just a tribute.
    11. Re:I don't really get it by neuroticia · · Score: 1

      A better logo for the spoofy "MSLinux" would be a penguin in shackles.

      I can just see it now... "All the power of Linux, but you can only run it if you have a licensed version of Windows installed."

      -Sara

    12. Re:I don't really get it by bhsx · · Score: 1

      Do you mean add to their distribution, or add code to other GPL code? They are also welcome to come out with "Microsoft Linux" with propreitary software bundled in it. It is also fine to tack a per seat license on the propreitary additions, allowing them to effectively make Win2004 right on top of linux without giving much of anything back to the community in way of source code. Read the GPL and know it. Know what it means, as there remain serious questions about loopholes in the rhetoric the GPL uses to get its point across.

      --
      put the what in the where?
    13. Re:I don't really get it by RaboKrabekian · · Score: 1

      "Microsoft invades cuba"

      I think we can safely assume this is a spoof site :) Well done indeed.

      --
      "Moderate drinking can help prevent amputated limbs" -- Abigail Zuger, NYTimes, 12/31/02
    14. Re:I don't really get it by NickV · · Score: 2

      this is a spoof site, right? Please?

      With hot topics on the upper right hand corner like "Microsoft Invades Cuba" and "Microsoft Monkey Colony on Mars," what do you think?

      Of course it's really silly!

    15. Re:I don't really get it by flacco · · Score: 2
      It's a linux expo? I mean, I have nothing against Microsoft, but I'm pretty damn sure they don't have a linux distrobution

      Forget about it, they just came to shit in the punch bowl and try to get a couple school-kids high.

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    16. Re:I don't really get it by dimator · · Score: 2

      That would be one way to squander their billions, and end up in the same league as RH or VA.

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    17. Re:I don't really get it by bluethundr · · Score: 1

      Doh!!!~!! Here's the Xenix link I tried to include in the last post. Not sure how that broke. Hopefully, this one wont...

      --
      Quod scripsi, scripsi.
    18. Re:I don't really get it by squarefish · · Score: 1

      What others are saying:

      "They want me to be a whore!"
      -- Linus Torvalds.

      "He doesn't scare me as much as
      he scares others."
      -- Richard Stallman

      "Jesus Christ, who are these
      people?"
      -- Bill Gates

      "I don't remember agreeing to
      that."
      -- Janet Reno

      "This is horseshit. Horseshit,
      horseshit, horseshit. And for
      those of you who don't know what
      that means, it's the shit that
      comes from a horse!"
      -- Greg, Columbia Internet

      --
      Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains.
    19. Re:I don't really get it by $pacemold · · Score: 1

      Hey! Look at this! (And it was there since October 1998...)
      Microsoft Linux 98

    20. Re:I don't really get it by drightler · · Score: 1

      Well Xenix didn't die.... It eventually turned into SCO OpenServer... then Caldera SCO OpenServer... and now its dying a quiet death....

      --

      blah blah blah....
      drightler@technicalogic.com
    21. Re:I don't really get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The site mslinux.org clearly contains multiple copyright infringements of Microsoft's content. I have contacted Microsoft notifying them of this; with any luck mslinux.org will be down within a week. And no, I'm not kidding.

    22. Re:I don't really get it by Destoo · · Score: 1

      MS invades Cuba? MS monkey colony on Mars!?!

      HA!
      I'm saving this page somewhere secure and we'll see if it was just a joke or a PROPHECY!!

      (What I don't get is getting comment: -1 overrated.. but only that. The moderator probably sensed I was french and modded accordingly. THANKS!)

      --
      Killing my karma

      --
      Nouvelles de jeux et technologies en français. TC
    23. Re:I don't really get it by zootread · · Score: 1

      Things added to their distribution released under GPL or similar license (and if they want to contribute to GPLed code, they can do that too). I'm quite aware that they can just throw proprietary software on top of Linux. I was just stating what circumstance I would find Microsoft's involvement with Linux as a positive thing. Of course, I wasn't being serious, Microsoft GPLing something?!?

      If Microsoft started making closed-source proprietary applications for Linux (e.g. Office), this wouldn't be so bad. But if they made a closed-source proprietary "Win2004 right on top of Linux" like you said -- yeah, that's something I would worry about as it could be damaging. Licensing and source code policy aside, I have to say I'd be interested in seeing how that would turn out.

      --
      Zoot!
    24. Re:I don't really get it by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      "Microsoft Monkey Colony on Mars,"

      Egad! They dangled the .NET carrot in front of Ximian, sucked them in and now plan to launch the entire development team to Mars!!! Diabolical.

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    25. Re:I don't really get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The site mslinux.org clearly contains multiple copyright infringements of Microsoft's content. I have contacted Microsoft notifying them of this; with any luck mslinux.org will be down within a week. And no, I'm not kidding.

      By contacted, you mean you walked across the campus to the legal department. Say hi to Bill and Steve at the pep rally for us.

    26. Re:I don't really get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not an employee, just a well-wisher who would like to see further proliferation of their vastly superior products.

    27. Re:I don't really get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Men don't feel a need to make their gender known in both their nick and by making an in-text signature, so why do you?

      I bet you like the attention you get from all the desperate male geeks too.

      Learn to substitute work for body. Thanks.

    28. Re:I don't really get it by Raffi+Spock · · Score: 1

      > anyone else see the contradiction?

      Along with "Microsoft Works."

      --
      Quid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
      Anything said in Latin, sounds profound.
    29. Re:I don't really get it by Kashif+Shaikh · · Score: 1

      "Microsoft Linux" Isn't that an oxymoron?

    30. Re:I don't really get it by Analog+Penguin · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it make more sense to announce it during the Expo, but not AT it, thus drawing attention away from everything else at the Expo?

      I dunno. It's late and I drank 128 ounces of iced tea today. That may not be a very coherent thought.

    31. Re:I don't really get it by jasonv118 · · Score: 1

      I read a letter by an an anti-linuxer who said
      "the day Microsoft is actually scared of your
      stupid operating system is the day that you will
      see Microsoft Linux 1.0 on store shelves." Well,
      I think this is fairly close.

    32. Re:I don't really get it by DoctorFrog · · Score: 1
      The site mslinux.org clearly contains multiple copyright infringements of Microsoft's content. I have contacted Microsoft notifying them of this; with any luck mslinux.org will be down within a week. And no, I'm not kidding.

      It's also clearly a parody, Elmer. Parody and satire are protected speech.

    33. Re:I don't really get it by mrjb · · Score: 1

      [link to mslinux.org]

      That link has been there for ages. I see the release date has been moved *again*? ;)

      --
      Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
    34. Re:I don't really get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It even ran on 386s back in the day.

      Xenix was designed to run on 8086 & 80286 systems. It never made it to 386's.

      But I believe that it was out at about the same time that Linux was just getting off the ground

      Xenix was about the same time that MS-DOS 3.x was getting off the ground, a good 7 or 8 years before Linux was even writting "AAAA BBBB" onto Linus' screen.

  5. Wouldn't it be grand by ShwAsasin · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Wouldn't it be grand to laugh and yell to them "Hey, get your crappy product out of here. We are in control for once and your product is a big segmentation fault".

    1. Re:Wouldn't it be grand by i64X · · Score: 0

      Yeah that would be *real* funny. It's peopel who do stupid things like that, that are going to make us all look bad.

    2. Re:Wouldn't it be grand by Anonymous+Cowrad · · Score: 1

      Yes, that would be fantastic. All the legitimacy linux has worked so hard to get, gone in a flash!

      Seriously, if you're going to win anyone over to linux, it won't be by shouting "you suxor!" at the competition. Linux can win by being a better product, not by slinging FUD back at Microsoft.

      --

      --
      pants ahoy
    3. Re:Wouldn't it be grand by $0+31337 · · Score: 0

      Yeah! That would be awesome... Then after we did THAT, we could tell them that they stink and if they try to use that old I'm rubber your glue routine, just yell real loud "NO, YOUR STUPID" and run out to your moms car so she can drive you home from the expo.

    4. Re:Wouldn't it be grand by ShwAsasin · · Score: 1

      I don't care about being anonymous or not. I have fun throwing my $0.02 (canadian) in. It just sucks that $0.02 is worthless, just like my opinions. =D

      Seriously though, imagine Microsoft created .LINUX or .NIX where you run a program and it black-screens on you. It'd be something like "SEGMENTATION FAULT: 0E, and you thought this OS was built on stability, built Microsoft tough".

    5. Re:Wouldn't it be grand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, what I would do is show up by their booth wearing a Microsoft t-shirt, and yelling out "Linux sux" just to make microsoft look bad.

    6. Re:Wouldn't it be grand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he's whoring for a +2. You know how clever those trolls are. I have a feeling that fucking moron will come back into the fold once he's bloated up his karma.

  6. MS Rep in Pengin Suit by sparrow_hawk · · Score: 1

    The thought of an MS rep in a penguin suit is enough to make me gag! ;-)

    1. Re:MS Rep in Pengin Suit by boomer_rehfield · · Score: 1

      I honestly think I would pay to see that....

      --
      Carpe Canem - Seize the Dog
    2. Re:MS Rep in Pengin Suit by MrNemesis · · Score: 0

      "Fake Tux: NOOO! How do they know I'm not real?!?!"

      Here's why: real pengiuns don't sweat that much, Mr. Ballmer.

      --
      Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
  7. Childish by Wrexen · · Score: 5, Funny

    No doubt this means that the more childish among us will make us all look bad. Sigh.

    Hi pot, this is kettle. You're looking mighty black today!

    1. Re:Childish by albalbo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What annoys me more is the insinuation that if you don't behave as if Microsoft would be welcome, then you're being childish. I don't see any reason why we should welcome the poster-child of proprietary software to a GNU/Linux show.

      --
      "Elmo knows where you live!" - The Simpsons
    2. Re:Childish by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1, Redundant

      You took the words right out of my mouth.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    3. Re:Childish by Wrexen · · Score: 1

      I think what you're more likely to see is zealots trying to sabotage their booth, harass the representatives, etc., and that's what he was referring to

    4. Re:Childish by neuroticia · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Er. Why wouldn't MS be welcome? I mean, of COURSE they're going to come with something Linuxey. I mean. They know that if they try to show MS Windows there they'll be lynched. >=]

      Honestly, though. Other proprietary vendors are welcome. (Think Maya, XSI, and a variety of other software vendors) Yes, MS is a bit over the top but... If they develop something for Linux why shouldn't they be welcome?

      Note that "Welcome" is hinged upon their developing something for Linux, and "Unwelcome" would be their showing up as the KKK at an African American march. Preaching "Open Source is Evil" would be bad manners and quite likely be met by geekily violence.

      -Sara

    5. Re:Childish by namespan · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Hi pot, this is kettle. You're looking mighty black today!

      Typical racist tripe. Sheesh.

      --
      Libertarianism is rich wolves and poor sheep playing gambler's ruin for dinner.
    6. Re:Childish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er. Why wouldn't MS be welcome?

      because many (most?) of the attendees simply don't like microsoft. don't like their products, don't like their business practices, don't like anything about them. if linuxworld cared about their attendees, they would've simply said "no" to microsoft.

    7. Re:Childish by slutdot · · Score: 1

      My god you're a fucking idiot. Haven't you ever heard of the expression "the pot calling the kettle black"?

    8. Re:Childish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> Hi pot, this is kettle. You're looking mighty black today!
      > Typical racist tripe. Sheesh.

      To educate the troll: "pot calling kettle 'black'" is a phrase from WAAAAY back, when both pots and kettles were made of cast/hammered iron, and both had a black iron finish as a result. They both looked the same, get it?

    9. Re:Childish by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

      tripe?

      I dont think that word means what you think it means....

    10. Re:Childish by BrerBear · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, Microsoft would NEVER do anything childish.

      From Wired News October 6, 1997:

      Much mirth was had in Mountain View on Wednesday when a certain party favor from the previous night's launch event for Microsoft's Internet Explorer 4.0 landed on the lawn of Netscape's world headquarters. As reported in the San Francisco Chronicle and elsewhere, the giant "e", (which was subsequently decorated by Netscape employees with a Mozilla doll) was surreptitiously transported from the San Francisco waterfront site of the launch party down the Peninsula by a group of unidentified Microsoft employees, and precipitated a pissing match between Microsoft and Netscape spokespersons over how sophomoric the prank was. What's being covered up in all this, of course, is exactly how high up the Microsoft command chain the conspiracy extended. It's not as if anyone's asking, "What did Bill Gates know, and when did he know it?" But we can tell you that many key, senior members of the IE team were co-conspirators. Indeed, there are even reports that the president of a Seattle-area company best known for its major-media-brand Web sites was among the crew joy-riding on the flatbed wielding the "e."

    11. Re:Childish by pr0t3uS · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "...why we should welcome the poster-child of proprietary software to a GNU/Linux show."


      Because we are open and free comunity! Let's show them (M$) that we are diferent then they are and don't exclude them or think of them as a threat which they are not. Why they would not be welcome? They will come to "our" house so let us behave like good hosts. Let them show that we can live with them if they can live with us. If they will insult us just show them the way out but let's not insult them for no reason.

      Respect your enemies and newer underestimate them.
    12. Re:Childish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Heh no doubt. This is coming from the guy who has Gates depicted as a Borg.

    13. Re:Childish by Subcarrier · · Score: 2

      I dont think that word means what you think it means....

      tripe
      1: lining of the stomach of a ruminant (especially a bovine)
      used as food
      2: nonsensical talk or writing [syn: folderol, rubbish, trumpery,
      trash, wish-wash, applesauce, codswallop]

      Somehow I doubt he meant the inside of a stomach...

      --
      "I have opinions of my own, strong opinions, but I don't always agree with them." -- George H. W. Bush
    14. Re:Childish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet, one has to wonder how many slashdot dorks say no to microsoft on their computers, at their expo's and want the DoJ to bust them own microsoft stock...

    15. Re:Childish by unicron · · Score: 2, Funny

      I know the guy that mooned Bill Gates during his keynote a few years back at Comdex. They've got a great shot of it somewhere, I should try to find it.

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    16. Re:Childish by prockcore · · Score: 2

      "Hi pot, this is kettle. You're looking mighty black today!"

      Of course you don't realize that slashdot is a stainless steel pot.

    17. Re:Childish by WNight · · Score: 2

      Nobody. The people who own MS stock are desperately praying that nothing happens to stop Microsofts stock price from rising.

      The people who actively oppose Microsoft are hoping their stock price will plummet to punish the asses who support illegal activities simply because they own stock.

      I doubt there's much overlap at all.

    18. Re:Childish by kcbrown · · Score: 2
      Because we are open and free comunity! Let's show them (M$) that we are diferent then they are and don't exclude them or think of them as a threat which they are not.

      They are a threat. Haven't you been keeping up with the news? They're a key player in the attempt to force DRM into the PC hardware architecture (the DRM architecture in question would prevent you from loading an operating system that wasn't signed, at least indirectly, by one of the root certificates. That means no Linux).

      Even if "unencumbered" x86 hardware were available (as in, systems running CPUs that don't have DRM built-in), that hardware will be a lot more expensive, because only servers would need such hardware, right? And you can bet the CPU manufacturers will charge a lot more money for the unencumbered CPU than the encumbered one.

      --
      Use 'slashdot stuff' in the subject line in any email you send me if you want to get past the spam filter.
    19. Re:Childish by jaffray · · Score: 2
      Why wouldn't MS be welcome? I mean, of COURSE they're going to come with something Linuxey.
      RTFA. "Right now, exhibitors at the Microsoft booth are planning on demonstrating products which feature Microsoft's Windows XP embedded technology. Houston emphasized that they have made great strides in the embedded space of late and Microsoft is eager to demonstrate those products to the attendees of the LinuxWorld Expo."
    20. Re:Childish by neuroticia · · Score: 1

      Do you know what one of those booths costs? ;) If they want to pay big money to come to a show where no one's interested in them in the least... That's their problem, no? I mean, they'll get about as good a reaction as a satanist at a Christian convention.

      That said, I say we storm the booth with penguin and OSS stickers =]

      -Sara

    21. Re:Childish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is, like, so cool. And it definitely doesn't sound like the behavior of a bunch of borgs.

      It must be fun, some of the time, to work for Microsoft. It sure sounds like it.

    22. Re:Childish by hayden · · Score: 2
      ... quite likely be met by geekily violence.

      Fear the geek with the grudge. Bad body odour and modified nerf guns are our tools (and we have the largest population of tools seen, not counting Eminem concerts).

      --
      Nerd: Derogatory term typically directed at anybody with a lower Slashdot ID than you.
    23. Re:Childish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HA! Boy aren't you clever.

    24. Re:Childish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is, like, so cool. And it definitely doesn't sound like the behavior of a bunch of borgs.

      It must be fun, some of the time, to work for Microsoft. It sure sounds like it.


      lemming

    25. Re:Childish by mpe · · Score: 2

      The people who own MS stock are desperately praying that nothing happens to stop Microsofts stock price from rising.

      Or at least don't fall as quickly as the rest of the US stock market :)

    26. Re:Childish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because we are open and free comunity! Let's show them (M$) that we are diferent then they are and don't exclude them or think of them as a threat which they are not.

      Problem is that Microsoft are a threat to the software industry.
      Would you have the same attitude it Al Queda wanted to exhibit?

    27. Re:Childish by DoctorFrog · · Score: 1
      Mostly true, but just to add a level of pedantry the kettles were normally made of tin. They would blacken if you didn't clean them after heating them on a wood or peat fire, so a blackened kettle was considered a sign of a sloppy housekeeper. So the joke is as you said, only more so; the pot calling a sooty (but shiny underneath) kettle black was actually black all the way through.

      Mum doesn't care about this computer stuff, but kitchenware is another story... ;)

    28. Re:Childish by pr0t3uS · · Score: 1

      The fact is that we don't know what Palladium with his hardware implementation will do. We are all just speculating. The expo with M$ will be a good place to ask them about it. The question is also who will certify the software that will be allowed to run on such hardware. I doubt that it will be M$. They are not authorized to give such certificates.

      I don't see why Linux would not be certified. After all pirated software is no issue in GNU/Linux world. We don't break any licenses using our software. If they force DRM on mp3's that's ok.

      GNU/Linux is a legitimate, legal OS. US Department of Defense is using it. German Parliament is using it... M$ can not just say that they don't approve it. I'm sure, that every OS will be certified and will be able to boot on such architecture. The Linux counter estimates that there are 18 million Linux users. Do you think M$ can say to all of us that we will have to use Windows in 2-4 years? And even if they can do you think we will change their minds by throwing rotten eggs at them on the expo? No, i don't see them as a threat they are just competition.

      Yes they have balls to show up on the expo but we will have to show more balls in dealing with them on a professional basis and not to look at them with hate in our eyes despite the facts what they already did or will do to us.

  8. I wonder... by T3kno · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does mooning their booth make the community look bad?

    --
    (B) + (D) + (B) + (D) = (K) + (&)
    1. Re:I wonder... by ender81b · · Score: 5, Funny

      Does mooning their booth make the community look bad?

      That depends. Since most geeks don't have ass's like britney spears I am very much betting it would make the community look bad. Nobody wants to see hairy ass, nobody.

    2. Re:I wonder... by warmcat · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually the goatsex guy would probably give it a go.

    3. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually I think this is the point - after all it's M$ that's being mooned, not the rest of the world

    4. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess that would depend on wether you shaved it or not

    5. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    6. Re:I wonder... by Band0r · · Score: 1, Funny

      I wonder what makes us so sure that Britney Spears' ass is NOT hairy. Has anyone on /. even seen her ass and is able to vouch that it is in fact hair free?

    7. Re:I wonder... by ender81b · · Score: 3, Funny

      Can you imagine the consequences for the world if Britney's ass was hairy? The shock, horror - MTV talking about it all day every day. Oh the bright side we would still get to see her ass, hairy or no.

    8. Re:I wonder... by GreggBert · · Score: 1

      That might depend on how funny your ass looks.

      --


      If you don't understand anything I post, please accept that I ate paste as a small boy...
    9. Re:I wonder... by sgage · · Score: 2

      " I wonder what makes us so sure that Britney Spears' ass is NOT hairy. Has anyone on /. even seen her ass and is able to vouch that it is in fact hair free?"

      Where are my damned mod points when I need 'em! ROFLM(H)AO!

    10. Re:I wonder... by RevLizard · · Score: 1

      Second the motion - NO HAIRY ASS!

      But as in a previous /. topic regarding "Britney suck", I'm ALL for that. I WOULD buy that DVD.

      --- Beer - not just for breakfast anymore.

  9. Maybe I missed something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I recall, MS was running an anti-linux campaign not 3 months ago......

  10. Dunking Booth by simetra · · Score: 3, Funny

    Bill G in a dunking booth. That would be funny.
    Their theme could be "Hugs, not Hurts."

    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
    1. Re:Dunking Booth by High+Jumbllama · · Score: 1

      That would be one hell of an unusual PR move. Microsoft showing humility to gain goodwill. AT the very elast, it would be one hell of an attention getter. Though, of course, it would never happen. They'd double their profits for the year charging $1000 a throw. Linux geeks and users would jump at the chance to dunk Bill.

    2. Re:Dunking Booth by snilloc · · Score: 1

      Bill probably wouldn't do it, but he might send Ballmer in his stead.

  11. I can't wait... by bahamat · · Score: 4, Funny

    to see what the more childish among us do!

    1. Re:I can't wait... by alienmole · · Score: 2

      I agree - as Brian Aldiss said, "When childhood dies, its corpses are called adults."

    2. Re:I can't wait... by teslatug · · Score: 2

      I can imagine: http://www.bitstorm.org/gates/

    3. Re:I can't wait... by hyacinthus · · Score: 2

      You mistake being _childish_ for being _childlike_. If you take a wild pleasure in running through the sprinklers in the park or in splashing in puddles in the rain, that's _childlike_, and there's nothing wrong with that. If you get your jollies hurling bricks through windows or (as is likely to happen in this case) heckling and name-calling the underpaid, harassed Microsoft employees staffing the booth at the conference, that's _childish_ and you deserve to have your ears boxed.

      There is such a thing as courtesy. Your parents might have taught you about it.

      hyacinthus.

    4. Re:I can't wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry to be pedantic here, but, you might want to look those words up in the dictionary.

      Running through the sprinklers in the park or splashing around in puddles in the rain, can be defined as either childlike _or_ childish.

      There's no requirement that childlike be associated with courtesy.

    5. Re:I can't wait... by alienmole · · Score: 1
      No, I don't make any such mistake - you make the mistake of making a number of assumptions and then basing your reaction to my comment on things you've only imagined.

      There is such a thing as courtesy. Your parents might have taught you about it.

      Courtesy might include not responding to people as though they've committed some act which you've only imagined.

      There's also such a thing as unintended irony, for example a comment about courtesy followed directly by a condescending remark about parents.

    6. Re:I can't wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just some guy trying to make up a bullshit distinction between words using his own made up definitions. You did the right thing.

  12. Embrace and Extend. by bigpat · · Score: 4, Funny

    We have finally assimilated them!

    1. Re:Embrace and Extend. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      all your service pack are belong to us

    2. Re:Embrace and Extend. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > We have finally assimilated them!

      I think the results of that would be acid indigestion..

    3. Re:Embrace and Extend. by HeUnique · · Score: 4, Informative

      It could be...

      It could be also that they'll demo SFU 3.0 (windows Services For Unix) - which was actually Interix until MS bought them (it was a very nice product, although the stuff there was ancient - X11R5, etc..)

      --
      Hetz (Heunique)
  13. Maybe Hell has frozen over... by srmalloy · · Score: 3, Funny

    And they're making Windows open-source...

    1. Re:Maybe Hell has frozen over... by zenray · · Score: 1

      Forget MS as an operating system. One thing that stops us here at work from adapting a GNU/Linux solution is the fact the MS Exchange server won't play nice with any Linux 'outlook like' display.

      --
      zenray
    2. Re:Maybe Hell has frozen over... by Micah · · Score: 2

      MS Exchange server won't play nice with any Linux 'outlook like' display

      Uh, Ximian micah have something to say about that...

    3. Re:Maybe Hell has frozen over... by Micah · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Odd as it sounds, I actually fully expect that to happen someday. It is ESSENTIAL to the future health of the technology industry that the de-facto platform that people use is open source, and people are finally starting to realize that.

      When the tidal wave of people switching to Linux hits -- and I do believe it will within the next couple years -- what else is Microsoft going to do? Their proprietary licenses just won't cut it. They will NEED to make Windows open source to keep control of the platform people use, to keep people from dumping it like a hot potato, and to make a market for their other products.

      Of course with OpenOfice.org, they'll even have trouble with THAT. :)

  14. Probably .NET by jsimon12 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I am sure they will be pushing .NET, with Mr Gnome following close behind. Oh well hopefully people will have sense to stay out of the clutches of the evil empire.

    Though being a huge corporation with mounds of cash they might just have some Hot Booth Babes .

    1. Re:Probably .NET by Neil+Watson · · Score: 1
      Pushing .NET? Yeah that makes sense.

      Oh well hopefully people will have sense to stay out of the clutches of the evil empire. /i>

      They'll be trying to draw you in. Maybe the Dianetics both will be next to them :)

    2. Re:Probably .NET by PovRayMan · · Score: 3, Funny

      I wonder if those booth babes will be wearing the tshirts you can find here...

    3. Re:Probably .NET by FatRatBastard · · Score: 2

      My wager goes with these things:

      - Hosting solutions (or something of that ilk). Its the focus of their two page ads in Linux Magazine each month.

      - Windows CE / XP Embeded.

      - Small footprint XP that was tuned for blades / black box server/SAN solutions.

      These are all areas where Linux is a credible short term threat to MS.

    4. Re:Probably .NET by kingkade · · Score: 1

      probably the best thing for non-MS systems may ironically be .NET since it is open, so that could only be a *good* thing for the linux community, right? But MS can still make important sw like office run only on windows .NET framework if they wanted, im sure...

    5. Re:Probably .NET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That comment by Anonymous Coward was insightful, because /. is full of idiots.

    6. Re:Probably .NET by blazer1024 · · Score: 1

      Why would they want to restrict office to Windows? That's where the money would be. Think of how many people could now switch to Linux because they have their MS Office... you'd have to buy a new copy of office for your new linux install... plus those existing linux users who want office (Not sure how many there are)... sounds like they'd make a few billion $ more.

      It's getting harder for them to make money of Windows itself.. not as many new systems are being purchased these days, and not so many are going after the new version(s).

    7. Re:Probably .NET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard also that they plan on uncovering their work on Office suite for Linux. Supposedly it is finished enough to demo. They haven't ported Outlook though (which is a shame).

    8. Re:Probably .NET by awx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I dunno, Ceren in a Borg suit would work for me. I'd have to spank her bottom for going to the Dark side though.

      Rawr.

      --
      Feel that power? That's mah MOUSING FINGER
    9. Re:Probably .NET by croanon · · Score: 0

      Doesn't matter for me. I already uninstalled Gnome and now using happily KDE the day icaza revealed .NET on Linux is financed by Ximian. I don't like projects like MONO, implementation of MONOpolist technology.

      --
      Dear Bill, do you have a .net tatoo on your ass for marketing?
  15. Redmond Linux by javacowboy · · Score: 2

    Hmmmm... so THIS is why Licoris decided not to call it "Redmond Linux" anymore...

    --
    This space left intentionally blank.
  16. The more childish among us??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    Hey, Taco, have a look in the mirror, LEGO-boy.

    Oh, but don't forget to take off your Darth Vader helmet first.

  17. childish? by Pave+Low · · Score: 5, Insightful
    No doubt this means that the more childish among us will make us all look bad. Sigh.

    Well, Taco you can start making slashdot look less childish by using a decent Microsoft icon, instead of the Bill Gates borg.

    --
    SIG:Slashdot: indymedia for nerds.
    1. Re:childish? by alienmole · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Using the Bill Gates borg isn't childish - aside from the fact that it communicates /.'s bias honestly and concisely, it also satirizes aspects of Microsoft's real-life conduct. Not so much childish as chillingly accurate.

    2. Re:childish? by Kiaser+Zohsay · · Score: 2, Troll

      > Well, Taco you can start making slashdot look less childish by using a decent Microsoft icon, instead of the Bill Gates borg.

      How about Gates as "Uncle Pennybags" from the Parker Bros. board game whose name escapes me at the moment...

      --
      I am not your blowing wind, I am the lightning.
    3. Re:childish? by OmniVector · · Score: 0, Troll

      If you don't t hink the Bill Gates Borg icon is hilarious then you shouldn't be reading slashdot :)

      --
      - tristan
    4. Re:childish? by DesScorp · · Score: 1

      Oh, he shouldn't be reading /. ? When did you get to decide this? Whether or not you like it, people here have a whole range of opinions. Better get used to it, Comrade.......

      --
      Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    5. Re:childish? by beleg777 · · Score: 1

      it communicates /.'s bias honestly and concisely

      Exactly. Businesses don't want anything to do with honesty or consiseness (that isn't a word, is it?).

      Seriously though, it does do those things, but it's also not professional. Like it or not, the professional world doesn't like blunt honesty. It prefers people only complain in private, and be nice and 'professional' to each others faces. I don't understand this in the least, but I am quite sure it's true.

      --

      Science may someday discover what faith has always known.
    6. Re:childish? by RebelWithoutAClue · · Score: 1
      How about Gates with a hitler mustache ?

      Might be a suitable replacement. :-)

      --
      "However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results" - Winston Churchill
    7. Re:childish? by dthable · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's amazing that the same people crying to give Linux a chance because it's superior to Windows don't want to give other opinions a chance when they go against the group-thought that is rampant on this site. The point is that Slashdot isn't a professional looking site and managers will stay away from the ideas and products pushed, despite how technically superior they operate.

      1980s: No one ever got fired for buying IBM
      1990s and beyond: No one ever got fired for buying Microsoft

    8. Re:childish? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was kind of funny the first time I saw it, but hilarious? Certainly not anymore.

    9. Re:childish? by joshsisk · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Seriously though, it does do those things, but it's also not professional.

      And what aspect of /. _is_ professional?

    10. Re:childish? by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      Slashdot is a glorified message board. I'd be worried if my manager's opinions were dictated, or even swayed, by opinions posted on any message board.

    11. Re:childish? by fraudrogic · · Score: 2, Funny

      MONOPOLY??? You've forgot the name of the game MONOPOLY?? hmmm...you're not from 'round here are you?

      --
      I only mod up parents of "mod parent up" posts...
    12. Re:childish? by alienmole · · Score: 1
      And your point is? /. won't become as widely read as the Wall Street Journal amongst corporate CEOs? I think that's a given...

      As for the professional habit of two-facedness, I've found that sometimes the most effective strategy is to be confrontational when there's a problem, even in a professional setting. The two-faced ones are the ones who are scared to rock the boat, because they're not secure about their own ability to survive an open battle. Their insecurity is usually justified!

      BTW, yes, conciseness is a word.

    13. Re:childish? by dthable · · Score: 1

      So is eWeek, InfoWorld, CTO, Business 2.0, and all of those other business trade journals, yet managers use those opinions all the time to discuss and make decisions that will affect the industry as well as their company. It's due to their professional attitudes that these sources of information become the corner of business decisions. (And why MS likes to spend more money on ads with these sources.)

    14. Re:childish? by Jonny+Ringo · · Score: 1

      I've seen they have gotten you too.

      Well, unless your like 7of9 your probably not worth saving.

    15. Re:childish? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sure, *you've* been coming around for ages, but some guy just saw slashdot for the first time today - and i'm glad he saw the MS/borg logo.

    16. Re:childish? by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 2

      Exactly. Businesses don't want anything to do with honesty or consiseness (that isn't a word, is it?).

      Seriously though, it does do those things, but it's also not professional. Like it or not, the professional world doesn't like blunt honesty.

      You may have noticed Slashdot's customary moniker that reads, in part, "News for Nerds." Note that nowhere does it say "News for Business Professionals." It doesn't mention executives, or financiers, nor does it come close to suggesting marketing or PR professionals. Nerds.

      Its been my experience that the really heavy techies in the Industry... the real Nerds and Geeks... tend to handle brutal honesty rather well. Especially when it involves tech subjects they have an opinion about. They may not appreciate the particular opinion. But they'll be glad to voice their own and defend their argument. And if they're successful in their environment - they're very aware to handle the Business Types with considerable more tact.

    17. Re:childish? by KILNA · · Score: 2

      I don't know whether to laugh or cry at that visualization.

      Waaaaahahahah.

      --
      Error: PANTS NOT FOUND. Press <F1> to continue.
    18. Re:childish? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You so fell for that troll dude.

    19. Re:childish? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft motto: "Embrace and extend"
      Borg motto : "You will be assimilated"

      I think the simily is pretty much on the dollar.

    20. Re:childish? by fredrik70 · · Score: 1

      wasn't a troll really, more dry wit IMHO.. funny though...

      --
      if (!signature) { throw std::runtime_error("No sig!"); }
    21. Re:childish? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      KISS MY ASS DICK

    22. Re:childish? by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      Actually, I believe most of those are _magazines_. Not message boards, as I stated.

  18. How does that saying go? by wrinkledshirt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First they ignore you...
    Then they laugh at you...
    Then they fight you...
    Then...

    --

    --------
    Bleah! Heh heh heh... BLEAH BLEAH!!! Ha ha ha ha...

    1. Re:How does that saying go? by Russ+Steffen · · Score: 1

      Then they talk trash about you through their mouthpieces in the press
      Then they buy congressmen to try and legislate you out of existence
      Then they start showing up at your trade shows
      Then ?????
      Then Profit?

    2. Re:How does that saying go? by dimator · · Score: 2

      I think the last one is:

      Then this quote gets so played out, its almost disgusting.

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    3. Re:How does that saying go? by daddymac · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Step One: Collect Underpants.
      Step Two: ????
      Step Three: Profit!

      --
      If something I said can be interpreted two ways, and one of the ways makes you sad or angry, I meant the other one.
    4. Re:How does that saying go? by HiThere · · Score: 2

      This is still a part of the:
      "Then they fight you"
      line. The winning is still to be proven, but it's becoming a bit more likely.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    5. Re:How does that saying go? by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Ghandi-esque motivational speeches aside, it usually ends, "Then you get your butt handed to you on a platter." There's a great deal of historical precedent for this.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    6. Re:How does that saying go? by Sentry21 · · Score: 2

      First they ignore you...
      Then they laugh at you...
      Then they fight you...
      Then...
      ...they assimilate you?

      --Dan

    7. Re:How does that saying go? by nathanh · · Score: 2

      Then everybody gets sick of this damn quote being repeated to death. Did you think somebody failed to read it the first million times?

    8. Re:How does that saying go? by Kashif+Shaikh · · Score: 1

      First they ignore you...
      Then they laugh at you...
      Then they fight you...
      Then...


      They fuck you.

    9. Re:How does that saying go? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, that's it! They're going to buy prostitutes for all the linux hackers to keep them from coding!

      If any of the booth babes start coming on to you, RUN!

    10. Re:How does that saying go? by aoliva · · Score: 1

      Then you win... dows? I hope not :-)

  19. New Distro! by Carthis · · Score: 1

    WINIX.

    It doesn't run on the standard EXT2 fs, but rather a strange variation called NTFS. It runs a non-standard X, closed source GUI that isn't very stable. It also comes with leading edge programs such as a solitare simulator and productivity applications such as Wordpad and Calculator. Promises to be great!

    Wait. That was Win95. 'Scuse me, I need to go gouge out my eyes. Why exactly are they attending!? That's like the NSA attending Defcon.

    1. Re:New Distro! by JamesOfTheDesert · · Score: 2
      Why exactly are they attending!? That's like the NSA attending Defcon.

      Exactly.

      --

      Java is the blue pill
      Choose the red pill
    2. Re:New Distro! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      err...Windows 95 doesn't run on NTFS

    3. Re:New Distro! by Carthis · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I, uh, realized that after hitting the submit button. My bad. *looks sheepish*

    4. Re:New Distro! by damiam · · Score: 1

      Windows 95 didn't use NTFS, it used FAT.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    5. Re:New Distro! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um the NSA does attend DEFCON

      or you think they don't show up for such great intel?

  20. Why wouldn't they get an exhibit? by BigGreen03 · · Score: 1

    They deserve one, enough of their NT / 2000 source is stolen from the unix distros...

    1. Re:Why wouldn't they get an exhibit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a guy who's never written a line of code in his life, and or a troll! HAHA!

    2. Re:Why wouldn't they get an exhibit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats halarious. Its more the other way around.. Microsoft stealing *BSD/Linux code.

    3. Re:Why wouldn't they get an exhibit? by qbed · · Score: 1

      wow, and here all along I was under the impression that NT was written by ex DEC VMS hackers...more fool me I suppose.

      --
      imagination is more important than knowledge --Albert Einstein-
  21. Please by dh003i · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Like they're going to be contributing anything worthwhile tot the Linux community anyways.

    Give me a break. Linux is MS' mortal enemy.

    The only thing they'll be there to do is spout BS FUD about how MS is superior to Linux.

    They'll probably point out a bunch of "flaws" in Linux which are unrelated to its superiority as an OS; i.e., "there's no clear scheme of ownership in Linux". They'll, of course, have no constructive criticism: all there will be is propaganda on how Linux is "fatally and irrecoverably flawed". They certainly won't offer any insights into solutions for the "problems" they point out, other than to switch to MS.

    1. Re:Please by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      Maybe they'll distribute free distro CDs for all the flavors of linux, or discount-coupons for CheapBytes, to 'cut off the air supply' to Red Hat & etc.

    2. Re:Please by dimator · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Would that make ANY sense at all to do? Set up a booth that does nothing but discredit every booth around it? Wouldn't that give them a black eye more than it would do anything else? Wouldn't every tech magazine bash them for doing that?

      Don't you think instead they'll be pushing .NET?

      Think before you post.

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    3. Re:Please by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 3, Funny

      actually if they are contributing *anything* at the conference make sure you get one... heck make sure you get three or five - or as many as you possibly can...

      trade show gimicky stuff isnt cheap. so get lots of it.... then throw it in the trash as you leave the conference. just make sure you say please - and thank you.

    4. Re:Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      40 billion in the bank and you think they cant afford to loose a few bux at a trade show ?

    5. Re:Please by dh003i · · Score: 2



      Well, gee, talk about FLAMEBAIT and OFF TOPIC at a LinuxWorld Expo. Using it to further their own interests, despite the fact it has no place at all.

      Try to think about what people are saying before your criticize. The point was M$ wouldn't be showing anything beneficial to Linux; they're only there to serve their own interests, and its completely inappropriate of them to be there.

  22. Someone's missing. by watanabe · · Score: 2
    Interesting. I note that Redhat is not listed among the exhibitors. Now that's a funny moment. Microsoft exhibits at Linux convention, while Redhat stays home.

    Hell ... is ... getting ... chilly ...

    (unlike Boston today.)

    1. Re:Someone's missing. by rhadamanthus · · Score: 2
      --
      Slashdot needs to interview Natalie Portman.
    2. Re:Someone's missing. by kneemow · · Score: 1

      They are there and have a large booth. The map displays the auditorium in three parts. M$ was located on the left RH is in the middle portion with M$ towards their backsides.

    3. Re:Someone's missing. by soloport · · Score: 2

      Tiny booth, for Microsoft. Sun's boot is about 16 times larger.

      Of course, size... doesn't... matter... Right?

    4. Re:Someone's missing. by Rob+Kaper · · Score: 2

      Maybe they bought Red Hat. It makes a profit, innovates and could be a threat to Microsoft. That usually means they buy it, right?

    5. Re:Someone's missing. by Rob+Kaper · · Score: 2

      Hm, KDE is also missing and I am pretty sure I am flying into San Francisco for LWCE.

      This either implies a very sloppy job by our organiser or that the exhibitor list is simply not complete.

  23. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  24. Interesting by rhadamanthus · · Score: 5, Informative
    According to the floor plan Microsoft is placed just across the way from Codeweavers (booth 1289). What an amusing prospect...

    ----rhad

    --
    Slashdot needs to interview Natalie Portman.
    1. Re:Interesting by dattaway · · Score: 2

      That isle will be the most dangerous place to be.

      Watch out for incoming nerf rockets from both sides.

    2. Re:Interesting by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 2
      Perhaps it's my memory going again, but isn't that where "Linux One" was supposed to be a couple years back?

      If it was - Ohhhh the sweet sweet irony!

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    3. Re:Interesting by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

      hmmm.... no linuxcare? or am I just blind...

      I just went and checked out the linuxcare site - and their management team. havent heard of any of those guys before - anyone know how they are doing?

    4. Re:Interesting by Buck2 · · Score: 1

      isle: a small island
      aisle: a passageway for inside traffic, as in a department store, warehouse, or supermarket.

      You conjured up an image of MS and CodeWeavers being stuck on the prototypical desert island with a single palm tree. That wouldn't be nerf rockets, it'd be cannabalism.

      Behold the DANGER of the MISTYPED WORD!

      --

      As my father lik@(munch munch)... ....
    5. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Perhaps it's my memory going again,"

      Dude, RAM is cheaper than ever! :-)

    6. Re:Interesting by sinserve · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      > You conjured up an image of MS and CodeWeavers being stuck on the prototypical
      > desert island with a single palm tree. That wouldn't be nerf rockets, it'd be cannabalism.

      Or a dry, ruff, homosexual anal-rape.

    7. Re:Interesting by dybdahl · · Score: 2

      An exhibition is not only about showing products - it's often more about making contacts. Being placed in front of codeweavers, they can see all the people visiting codeweavers. I wouldn't be too happy if I were codeweavers.

  25. Xbox Linux Project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you think the Xbox Linux Project's anonymous hacker will be willing to give M$ his $200,000? =) Wouldn't that be amusing...

  26. I think this is a good thing... by slakdrgn · · Score: 1
    ....it'll be funny to watch everyone snuff at their booth.. and of course all the people walking around asking them questions they can't answer.

    Seriously tho, it would be interesting, mabey they will be able to see first hand how a stable Operating system is suppose to work! ;)

    1. Re:I think this is a good thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mabey they will be able to see first hand how a stable Operating system is suppose to work!

      They already get to see a stable OS every day. All they have to do is go to Hotmail's backend machines. Plenty of FreeBSD boxen still there!

    2. Re:I think this is a good thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some folks at MS use Linux internally.

      Oh, and I'll reply to myself right here so some other jerk doesn't have to.

      "All you have is anecdotal evidence. Unless you provide some sort of reference to back your claims up, I won't believe what you're saying. I won't! I won't, I won't, I won't!"

    3. Re:I think this is a good thing... by slakdrgn · · Score: 1
      as another guy replied too, I completely forgot they're using BSD for their hotmail service.. and I guess they do know how a stable operating system is suppose to work, they did rape bsd afterall.. I just think they like making big semi-useless patches.. (now really, does it take 22mb to close a hole in Media player??) ;)

      slak

  27. Is this like.. by MarvinMouse · · Score: 3, Funny

    an alcoholics anonymous booth at a beer convention?

    Or do you think MS is going to actually give in to Linux?

    --
    ~ kjrose
    1. Re:Is this like.. by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

      Is this like an alcoholics anonymous booth at a beer convention?

      More like a Miller Lite booth at an AA convention.

      Or do you think MS is going to actually give in to Linux?

      The first part of the phrase is "embrace", right?

    2. Re:Is this like.. by Scott+Wood · · Score: 1

      Or a Miller Lite booth at a beer convention, for that matter...

    3. Re:Is this like.. by furchin · · Score: 1

      More like a beer booth at an alcoholics anonymous convention...

    4. Re:Is this like.. by Vinson+Massif · · Score: 1

      ... RJ Reynolds at an American Medical Assoc. meeting ...

      --
      "Remember, any tool can be the right tool." -- Red Green
    5. Re:Is this like.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's more like a personal grooming products booth at a Linux convention.

  28. This is a joke by Slack0ff · · Score: 1

    Why would microsoft be there? Are they going to introduce there own linux distro or somthing gay? I can only imagine now a Linux XP *Shudders*

    --
    Everyday You see me is the worst day of my life -Office Space
    1. Re:This is a joke by WhiteKnight07 · · Score: 1

      Maybe they are going to release Microsoft BOB under the GPL....

      --


      We're going to make information free Mr. Anderson, whether you like it, or not.
  29. Bill Gates talaxian instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Well, Taco you can start making slashdot look less childish by using a decent Microsoft icon, instead of the Bill Gates borg."

    I'd rather see a Gates icon that looked like Neelix. In terms of trekdom, Borg are still cool even if "Voyager" made them banal. Talaxians like Neelix are never cool (the "lets make a new costume by combining a baseball with Ron Howard" look).

    1. Re:Bill Gates talaxian instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually a Ferengi would a better match. Talaxians just look stupid. Ferengi put the almighty dollar (okay, gold-spanked latinum or whatever it is) above all else, like Bill.

    2. Re:Bill Gates talaxian instead? by mpe · · Score: 2

      Actually a Ferengi would a better match. Talaxians just look stupid. Ferengi put the almighty dollar (okay, gold-spanked latinum or whatever it is) above all else, like Bill.

      Maybe slashdot could use a regular Ferengi for Enron, Wordlcom, Xerox, (whatever the next one will be). With a Borgified Ferengi for Microsoft :)

    3. Re:Bill Gates talaxian instead? by hazyshadeofwinter · · Score: 1

      > "Well, Taco you can start making slashdot look less childish by using a decent Microsoft icon, instead of the Bill Gates borg."

      I've always been partial to some of the ones that come with XBill... (google for it yerself, it's worldwide 2lazy2link nite...)

      --
      Click here if you just like to click on shit.
  30. Better to be childish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    than a self-righteous prick, eh Taco?

  31. What does that mean? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1, Troll

    No doubt this means that the more childish among us will make us all look bad.

    Can anyone please explain to me what that comment is supposed to mean? Who is "us", and to whom are we looking bad?

    This isn't a rhetorical question. I really want to know what the hell Taco is talking about, so I can post a witty retort making fun of him.

    1. Re:What does that mean? by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      By "us" he means 'The Linux community.'

      Malda feels he is an upstanding member of said community, and that some of you roughnecks are gonna make him and the guys in suits look bad.

      It's a sign that he's 'growing up.' Possibly the shock of one of his boyhood idols passing away last week is a factor in this.

    2. Re:What does that mean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "us" refers to the Linux community. Taco is just anticipating someone in the Linux community that will not be able to control him/her self and embarass US with some act of stupidity. We don't need to cause trouble with Microsoft, they can't compete with a Linux disto unless they are sincere in efforts to use the GPL with it. Besides, Microsoft poses no threat to this community.

    3. Re:What does that mean? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

      Wow. That's probably the most reasonable statement I've ever read from Taco. Maybe I have him pegged wrong after all.

    4. Re:What does that mean? by sporkboy · · Score: 1

      When I saw him speak, he seemed to be a person just like me, who happens to use open source tools because they're right for the job at hand. Losing sight of that and turning it into a holy war of some sort can never have any positive ramifications, unless in the eyes of other like-minded zealots. Taco has it right here, and I'm glad to see a voice of reason coming from "on high" as it were.

  32. Causing a reaction by zeus_tfc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My first question after reading the headline, and even after reading the article was "Why?" Does Microsoft expect to try and win converts? I seriously doubt it, and I don't think anyone will believe that they have something to contribute. So, why?

    I think they are trying to cause a reaction and get people upset. They can point to this and say, "Look at how uncivil and mean these people are. Do you really want to be associated with them?" This will give them more leverage in the business world, where professionalism means quite a lot. Remember, MS is more about marketing right now than solid products.

    I dunno. Just a thought.

    --
    "...At the end of the day"..."when everyone goes home, you're stuck with yourself." RIP Layne Staley
    1. Re:Causing a reaction by idletask · · Score: 1

      > Remember, MS is more about marketing right now than solid products.

      Hmmm... Don't you think this is exactly this kind of thoughts (especially if expressed voicely during the event) that will fuel Microsoft's argumentation on whatever subject Microsoft will handle to the mainstream press once the event is over? As to how they would exploit it...

      Frankly, I'd rather this piece of news hadn't even made it to slashdot - or better yet, that it *had* made it to slashdot but with just 0 comments.

      OK, I lose, this is yet another comment.

    2. Re:Causing a reaction by 3seas · · Score: 2

      Oh no.....It's really much much simpler and obvious than that.

      They are arrogant! Really ARROGANT! So Arrogant that they
      continue to practice anti-competitive behaviour after being
      found guilty of breaking federal anti-trust law.

      I mean how can MS be doing something wrong now, as they have
      already been busted, they can't do it again... Sort of arrogance.

      You know it's true!

      MS has kept others, competitors, out of shows they controlled in
      the past, but Linux should be better, give them a chance to leave
      on their own.

      Other exhibitors don't want to get caught up in anything questionable
      in regards to MS getting to and setting up and showing and breaking
      down.... Beside alot of fun can be had at MS expense.

      But there is nothing stopping visitors on their way out, to stop by
      and express to MS what they think of all the FUD MS has been spreading.
      Preferable in pointing out, in a very professional manner, how
      un-professional and outright dishonest such FUD MS has been doing
      against the GPL and such, is. While carefully pasting kick me signs
      on the backs MS booth tenders (including any security MS feels they
      need to hire). (But do it in a very professional manner. Embrace and
      Attach.)

      Some might even be so kind to want to bring them some pies.....Now
      what flavor of pie does Bill Like?

      I have no doubt that it would only take a little civil effort to
      convert the MS booth tenders over to GPL. Simply by communicating to
      them in all the harmless humorous creative ways I know the Linux
      crowd can come up with.

      Just don't be Arrogant in doing it.

    3. Re:Causing a reaction by Anarchofascist · · Score: 2

      "I think they are trying to cause a reaction and get people upset. They can point to this and say, Look at how uncivil and mean these people are..."

      I can't make it to the conference myself, but could the local Linux LUG please organise some sort of community bodyguard group to protect the MS booth from the attacks of childish morons? I don't want to see headlines in Slashdot the day after the event "MS booth flour-bombed" or "Stink-bomb ruckus at MS booth".

      --
      Once more unto the breach, dear friends, once more, Or close the wall up with our American dead!
    4. Re:Causing a reaction by aralin · · Score: 2
      Why?

      "Developers, developers, developers...."

      Do I need to say more?

      "Developers, developers, developers...."

      Did I make myself clear?

      --
      If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
    5. Re:Causing a reaction by Saint+Fnordius · · Score: 2

      I think it could also be cluelessness mixed in with a large dosage of arrogance. Until now, the attitude Microsoft keeps on trying to project is: "Yeah, Linux is fun, but when you're ready to do REAL business work, we're right over here!"

      Although I wouldn't put it past MS to put some dupes into their booth to draw fire, they could also be planning on spinning this in a later press release, talking about how many visitors they had (not mentioning that they were almost all hecklers!).

    6. Re:Causing a reaction by Slashamatic · · Score: 2
      I don't know about the US but the LinuxWorld Europe exhibition in Germany is colocated with a major banking technology exhibition. The badge for one gets you into the other.

      I can imagine that MS, oozing professionalism (=lots of money and practice) can put on a somewhat better booth than most Linux exhibitors. If they get a reaction, I hope that it is rectricted to the humourous (Borged Penguins?) and few machined in nearby booths running the BSOD screensaver.

  33. Speculation by The+Asmodeus · · Score: 1

    Ok, granted this is odd, but one has to wonder what their goal will be. Microsoft is a LOT of things but one thing they do well is market. So they must have a goal in mind to risk walking into such a hostile environment.

    Just BEING there lends credence to the expo in the minds of "Microsoft only" people. And MS certainly should know they aren't going to win any converts there. So what IS their goal?

    Could they be there to announce (and promote) a possible MS Office for Linux? A MS distribution? What?

    1. Re:Speculation by geeklawyer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1) get bad PR on F/OS people. Imagine the PR effect of a photo of a 'linux zealot' taking a swing at one of the MS suits.

      2)From the antitrust perspective - showing that they are not 'hostile' to Linux by exhibiting at a linux expo.

      3) genuinely attempting to turn waverers/gullible to the dark side.

      4) Intercepting any curious neutrals and diverting them from the competition - e.g. educational bodies, corporates, people interested in OpenOffice etc..

      5) sheer fucking chutzpah...

      --
      -he who laughs last, is a bit slow.
      journal
    2. Re:Speculation by Ensign+Nemo · · Score: 1

      My thoughts are that they'll observe people's
      reactions and then come up with better ways
      to outsmart/outmanuever/attack linux and open source in the future.

    3. Re:Speculation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a guess. They will GPL parts of their Palladium cryptographic software agents.

    4. Re:Speculation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they are going to announce that they are releasing Microsoft Xenix as Open Source as a way of giving back to the community ?

  34. cool! by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

    Then I guess that this is no longer a spoof?!

    1. Re:cool! by rjmcleod · · Score: 1

      yeah, it's not a spoof. Microsoft is really coming out with MSLinux. Go to www.you_are_very_gullible.com for more news on the November release

  35. Linux Asses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like the 'BSD is dying' troll here, or Joe Barr?

    You all remember Joe Barr - The Mindcraft letter...

  36. What??!! by bogie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "No doubt this means that the more childish among us will make us all look bad. Sigh"

    Considering Microsoft has called the GPL a "Cancer" and attacks linux publicly whenever possible by telling outright lies, how can we ever look bad?

    Microsoft is publicly out to destroy linux and whatever their motives, they have a lot of nerve to show up in the first place.

    Feel free to pelt them with eggs, because that pales in comparison to their attempts to spread FUD and eventually make our OS illegal or impossible to use. Feel free to mod me down, but nothing I said is a lie.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    1. Re:What??!! by TheLocustNMI · · Score: 2

      Quote:
      "Considering Microsoft has called the GPL a "Cancer" and attacks linux publicly whenever possible by telling outright lies, how can we ever look bad?"

      Have you been reading Slashdot comment? I'm surprised folks won't be throwing their own feces!

    2. Re:What??!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering Microsoft has called the GPL a "Cancer" and attacks linux publicly whenever possible by telling outright lies, how can we ever look bad?

      Because Microsoft can afford advertising, publicity campaigns, lobbyists, and media access (I mean, they do partially own their own media network... Those who have been chosen and/or brought to the forefront as Linux Spokespersons, as a rule, do not. Though some of them have weblogs.

    3. Re:What??!! by totro · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >Considering Microsoft has called the GPL a "Cancer"
      >and attacks linux publicly whenever possible by
      >telling outright lies, how can we ever look bad?

      Despite the truth that only the informed few know, the ignorant masses will much sooner believe Microsoft because **money talks** (trough PR).

      Anyone throwing eggs will be branded an anarchist, terrorist, you name it, just like most protesters protesting anything these days. The excellent points about MS trying every dirty trick imaginable to defeat Linux will very likely not make it to mainstream news sources. Throwing eggs will give Slashdotters a chuckle, but will do little to forward the cause of Linux and like-minded projects. It will just give the rest of the world more ammunition to ignore our legitimate concerns.

      A little maturity goes a long way towards credibility, people!

    4. Re:What??!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "Considering Microsoft has called the GPL a "Cancer" and attacks linux publicly whenever possible by telling outright lies, how can we ever look bad?"

      Because Microsoft is one of the 6 corporations who control 90% of what americans see and hear. MSNBC will spin any event as evidence of the crazyness of the open source movement, and you can bet disney, aol/time warner, news corp., et al will follow suit.

    5. Re: What??!! by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2

      > Despite the truth that only the informed few know, the ignorant masses will much sooner believe Microsoft because **money talks** (trough PR).

      "Trough PR" - I like that. (I suppose you meant "through PR", but if so the slip was felicitous.)

      At any rate, with citizens' distrust of big corporations at an all time high, this is probably the best time for anti-MS PR to kick into high gear. Eggs won't help, but let your voices be heard.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    6. Re:What??!! by __aafutm5472 · · Score: 1

      I agree with all your points.

      Besides, a much better way to get back at them would be to hack their display, no? Imagine the Mircosoft Drone extolling the virtues of their operating system, when all of the suddent a message box pops up on their screen:
      "This would never happen on a Linux machine"
      Followed by the BSOD.

      Why throw eggs, when you can make them look bad on a technological level, which is where Linux and the Linux crowd excells anyways?

    7. Re:What??!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The guys in one of the adjoining booths would get a lot of brownie points if they were to print up a large banner that said something like,

      Microsoft Says,
      "The GPL is a Cancer"

      and then hang it on the part of their booth closest to MS's booth.

    8. Re:What??!! by BigGar' · · Score: 2, Informative

      Feel free to pelt them with eggs

      Nah, eat a relly bad diet for a few days prior then walk up to the booth, ask them what's going on. Then as you leave, BREAK WIND.

      --


      Shop smart, Shop S-Mart.
    9. Re:What??!! by sheldon · · Score: 2

      Feel free to pelt them with eggs, because that pales in comparison to their attempts to spread FUD and eventually make our OS illegal or impossible to use.

      The statement "eventually make our OS illegal or impossible to use" would qualify as FUD under most definitions, and I find it curious you decided to employ FUD in a message intended to denounce FUD.

      This is that part about being mature. If you have legitimate complaints, then voice them. When you start shouting the sky is falling and people look around and see no debris, they're going to relegate you to the "oh, that lunatic again" category and stop listening to you.

      I sense a lot of hatred in your message that seems to be distorting your view of reality. Let go of the hatred, for it will only lead you to the dark side of the force.

    10. Re:What??!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hehe just leave paper bags filled with dogshit near their booth before they get there.Make sure they're nicely hidden, so they can't find it. Then no one will want to be around that display as the day progresses ........ :-)

    11. Re:What??!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm surprised folks won't be throwing their own feces!

      Speak for yourself...

    12. Re:What??!! by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "Why throw eggs, when you can make them look bad on a technological level, which is where Linux and the Linux crowd excells anyways?"

      Because technology isn't everything. Design and ease of use are also HUGE requirements to a desktop operating system. Linux is still very much behind in that area. KDE's not bad, but it still has a ways to go.

      Hopefully KDE (or Gnome, or anybody else really...) will look at what Apple did with OSX and BSD and and try to replicate it. The goal? To make it so the average desktop user never needs to use Linux's shell. When that happens, Linux will indeed be the favored OS of choice.

      Apple already figured this out, and what they did is pretty damn cool.

    13. Re:What??!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Afaik PC is short for "personal computer" which includes Linux boxes, Macs and even my old Commodore 64 (which iirc was marketed just as a "PC"). The fact that Wintel/AMD more or less have hijacked the term "PC" doesn't make other personal computers less so. Also, a lot of PC magazines regularily have articles about Linux and other OSes.

      If PC World is Windows expo only, why didn't they call it Windows World or Wintel World?

    14. Re:What??!! by WowTIP · · Score: 2

      Pelt them with eggs???

      Why not set up a Microsoft Certified (monkey boy) Dance outside their booth. If someone questions your behavior you can just tell them you are a fan of Steve Ballmer and paying a tribute.

      --

      --

      "I'm surfin the dead zone
      In the twilight, unknown"
    15. Re:What??!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can just picture the video camera footage that MS will get of nasty looking MS haters throwing abuse at the stand...which they'll spin off into some great ad campaign...lets face it - the general public* find geeks a little disturbing at times :)

      * most IS managers fit into the "general public" cattegory, not the "geek" cattegory :)

    16. Re:What??!! by PFAK · · Score: 0

      Considering the fact that MSNBC has put up an article called "Linux for the Masses".. you start to wonder why it was called Redmond Linux.. maybe its part of Microsoft's goal to take over the industry all-together.

      --

      Free means no restrictions, ironic the FSF's GPL forces restrictions, isn't it? What's your definition of free?
    17. Re:What??!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A little maturity goes a long way towards credibility, people!

      And all geeks running linux want credibility? This is gonna be fun.

    18. Re:What??!! by Malcontent · · Score: 2

      "Considering Microsoft has called the GPL a "Cancer""

      Let's not forget MS execs calling us un-american, communists and terrorist sympatizers too. I for one would like to punch them out just for calling me communist.

      I agree with you hit them with whatever is handy. They deserve much worse then anything you are likely to do to them.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    19. Re:What??!! by miffo.swe · · Score: 1

      I really dont think it has such long way really. All the pieces are ready, its just a matter of someone gluing them together into a coherent desktop. I havent a single issue right now at my own linux desktop. EVERYTHING works just as I want it to. When someone big enough decides to make a tailor made home desktop of off linux it will rock.

      --
      HTTP/1.1 400
    20. Re:What??!! by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "All the pieces are ready, its just a matter of someone gluing them together into a coherent desktop."

      I agree with this comment. I just installed Redhat last week at work, and it was easy in some respects, hard in others. (as if anybody knows what the vertical AND horizontal resolution of their monitor is.) I'm still tweaking this and that to make it usable for what I'm doing. I'm happy that by default, nearly everything worked. I didn't have such luck last time I used Redhat back in version 6.

      I still have two chief complaints right now: Thre are too many places where I can screw up and break it. Case in point: Disc 3 of Redhat 7.3 was bad. I discovered this during the last phase of the install. It immediately gave me the choice of 'reboot'. No 'try the disc again' or 'reboot, then the install will resume'... I had to go through the 2 hour process all over again. (This is Redhat's fault though, I'm not blaming Linux for it. Linux hadn't even started yet.)

      The other is that I had to run out to shell in order to get Samba working. This was so I could talk to the other machines on the network. I'm a newb here so maybe I missed something, but there didn't appear to be a graphical way of mounting Samba shares in KDE. (Any insight into this would be GREATLY appreciated.)

      As you said, the pieces are there. They need a design group to come in polish it up. Hell, I wish the Linux community could throw a few hundred thousand dollars at Apple and have them do it for us as a consultant. That'd be bad ass. I know it won't happen, but still. :P

    21. Re:What??!! by Planesdragon · · Score: 2

      I for one would like to punch them out just for calling me communist.

      Why, exactly? The whole Cold War was fought with pure FUD on both sides; for what reasons, exactly, do you so dislike Communism?

      The GPL does indeed work like a cancer. GPL'd code lives forever, instead of dying after a set time. GPL'd code gets close to other code, invades other code (mostly through developer work), and then it takes over the whole of the non-GPL'd project.

      Even if the above doesn't happen, there's *nothing* in the GPL to prevent it. GNU.org could kill MS's FUD with one simple amendment to the GPL (codify what is and is not derivitive *in the license*, or for pete's sake at least require Clear Identification), but they don't.

    22. Re:What??!! by acebone · · Score: 1

      Why not a silent understanding between the majority of people there... If you have gas - go the the M$ stand and let it gently go.

      --
      Check out my PHP Url Validator
    23. Re:What??!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't you be hanging out on Mad Magazine's website?

    24. Re:What??!! by Malcontent · · Score: 2

      "Why, exactly?"

      Because I am not a communist, anti-american or a terrorist. I am a veteran, I served my country proudly, i vote, I participate. Who the hell is Bill Gates to call me a communist.

      As for the GPL it has nothing to do with me being a communist. If you don't like the GPL stay the fuck away from GPLed code. Write your own code and stop your whining about how you are unable to use other peoples hard work to make money for yourself. That sound more like communism then anything else to me.

      Write your own code, that's the american way. Anybody who is whining about the GPL is too lazy to do the work themselves and want to steal from other people. As a christian you ought to be the first one stand up and sing the virtues of working hard and not leeching off of other peoples labor. The is a cost to using GPLed code and that cost is steep. If you don't want to pay it stay away.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    25. Re:What??!! by Planesdragon · · Score: 2

      First off, I have nothing but repsect for veterans, Sir. Please don't take my questions as an attack at your honor, but rather as a simple intellectual discussion.

      Write your own code, that's the american way. Anybody who is whining about the GPL is too lazy to do the work themselves and want to steal from other people.

      Actually, I prefer to pay others to write my code, and to utilize the freely given efforts of others whenever possible when construcing something as utilitarian as a software project; were I a coder, I would follow the way of my friends who do code and use the GPL, as being the closest thing there is to a real software "community."

      As a christian you ought to be the first one stand up and sing the virtues of working hard and not leeching off of other peoples labor. The is a cost to using GPLed code and that cost is steep. If you don't want to pay it stay away.

      As I said above, I have no problem at all in paying the cost of using GPL'd code. But this discussion isn't about the GPL--it's about communism.

      As a Christian, I have as much right as anyone else to dislike Communism (The second Fatima prophecy was about the evils of Communism.) But as a Chrisitian, I am compelled to love--and therefore attempt to undersand--the enemy.

      In theory, Communism seems to be an ideal system; everyone works, and everyone benefits. But it is riddled with faults and corruption, from double standards to tyranny to religious oppression. It's also attached to an amazing system of FUD brought about partly by the less-than-perfect capitalists of the 20th century, and mostly by the countries that didn't take kindly to a new government calling for a worldwide revolution.

      I think Bill Gates is a poster child for the USSR's anti-capitalist propaganda when he calls the GPL "Communist"--but I would hope that you sir, as an honored veteran, would know why you hate the defeated enemy, and not simply follow the unquestioned FUD that was necessary to win the Cold War.

    26. Re:What??!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "A little maturity goes a long way towards credibility, people!"

      So does a lot of snubbing. Everyone should just ignore them, that would be best for all parties. Microsoft is a cancer that is growing on free society, it must be cut off and disposed of.

    27. Re:What??!! by Malcontent · · Score: 2

      "but I would hope that you sir, as an honored veteran, would know why you hate the defeated enemy, and not simply follow the unquestioned FUD that was necessary to win the Cold War."

      I do not hate the communists or the russians. When I was stationed within 300 miles of vladivostok (the biggest russian military base) we used to joke that if the russians ever came after us we'd offer them vodka and get them drunk because both the US soldiers and the russian ones would have rather drank themselves silly then shoot each other.

      As for communism itself it's main tenents are not that much different then the sermon on the mount. The problem of communism is the problem of people. People are not good, generous or considerate of others needs. Communism does not work because people are not good, capitalism does work because people are selfish and greedy. But that's neither here nor there.

      I don't hate communists or communism. What I hate is Bill gates calling me a comunist or a terrorist when I am clearly not. Especially since he has never volunteered to wear a gas mask for 10 hours and stew inside a chem suit in hundred degree weather. He has no right to call me a communist.

      He is doing that because he knows that most people associate communism with stalin, lenin and other evil people who slaughtered millions of innocents. He wants the average american to think of GPL coders and advocates as murderers and evil. It's a calculated attack on people. He could have said GPL is like socialism (it is), he could have said GPL is like charity (it is), he could have said it's like christianity (it is kind of), instead he chose the word communism. Why? Because Americans react negatively and violently to communists. That's what he wants! He wants Americans to react negatively and violently towards me, you, and anybody else who develops or uses GPLed software.

      For that reason alone MS and it's employees deserve every rotten egg, tomato or a fist thrown in their direction. I don't go around slandering them or their families nor do I go around lobbying politicians to make what they do illegal. Why are they attacking me?

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    28. Re:What??!! by jakew · · Score: 1

      For that reason alone MS and it's employees deserve every rotten egg, tomato or a fist thrown in their direction.

      Hmm. Interesting. Now think for a second, what would Jesus have to say about that remark?

      For the record, I'm an agnostic-atheist pacifist, and I disagree. Morality can come from logic as easily as it can from religious teachings.

    29. Re:What??!! by Planesdragon · · Score: 2

      Hmm. Interesting. Now think for a second, what would Jesus have to say about that remark?

      "Hey, let me do that." Jesus is God, and God can punish people; heck, the whole imperetive to love thy enemy is because they need to be loved, especially once God gets angry at them.

      For the record, I'm an agnostic-atheist pacifist, and I disagree. Morality can come from logic as easily as it can from religious teachings.

      You're either Agnostic (don't know) or atheist (know that there's nothing.) Please pick one.

      And you're right--in theory. Morality can be reasoned out by man. But I don't think God wanted to wait for us to figure out what was good and what wasn't on his own, so he spent several thousand years trying to teach us.

    30. Re:What??!! by Malcontent · · Score: 2

      "ME---
      For that reason alone MS and it's employees deserve every rotten egg, tomato or a fist thrown in their direction.

      YOU---
      Hmm. Interesting. Now think for a second, what would Jesus have to say about that remark? "

      I don't know nor do I care. I don't believe in God. What I do know is this.

      When Bin Laden attacked the US we went after the taliban because they were shielding him. When we went after the taliban we dropped bombs on counless locations in afghanistan. We killed thousands of people who were either foot soldiers of the taliban or lived in taliban controlled areas. What did these people have to do with the attack on world trade center? Well nothing really but they were legitamate targets of military action because however indirect their actions helped al-quada attack WTC. They shoulder some of the blame no matter how small and for that they died.

      The same goes for Microsoft employees. They are responsible for the actions of their company, supervisors, CEOs etc. It is fair and just to retaliate against them for the crimes and evil acts done by their company and it's employees. It is fair to hit, shun, insult, and otherwise take to task any MS employee for what their bosses do. If they don't like it they should quit and stop supporting an evil regime. Simple as that.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    31. Re:What??!! by jakew · · Score: 1

      So a moment ago you were advocating throwing tomatoes and even fists at MS, but now you say you love them. I'm confused. I admit that it has been some time since I last read the Bible, but as I recall, he wasn't keen on punishment, preferring to leave it to daddy if it had to be done. And I don't recall him ever hurting anyone. God yes, Jesus no. Am I wrong?

      You're either Agnostic (don't know) or atheist (know that there's nothing.) Please pick one.

      Ok, that one's easy. An agnostic says that one cannot know whether there is a god or not. An atheist can deny the existence of a god, OR can simply fail to believe in such a god. I fall into the latter category - looking at the available evidence, I think it is more probable that there isn't, but that isn't a belief, and I accept that I may be wrong. Hence I am an agnostic atheist. Happy?

      In reply to your sig, no problem whatsoever. I personally admire your faith, though I do not share it.

      Maybe if God does exist, he'd be happy as long as people were acting in a moral fashion, for whatever reason.

    32. Re:What??!! by jakew · · Score: 1

      Hmm. Interesting. I think perhaps that explains the difference in attitude, because you see I personally find killing those people unacceptable. So that was a very good example. Thanks.

    33. Re:What??!! by hesiod · · Score: 1

      : For that reason alone MS and it's employees deserve every rotten egg, tomato or a fist thrown in their direction.

      I am decidedly anti-MS and wish horrible things upon the company and the people who make real decisions. That said, how much management power (ie true responsibility for the company) do you think MS's LinuxWorld booth trolls have? Very little, probably; abusing them really says nothing about a person's dislike for MS, it shows a disdain for people just because of where they work. Tell them in no uncertain terms that their company is not welcome, but don't attack them personally. Burn down the booth, just rescue the innocent brainwashed MS-ployees so they aren't killed (since Bill won't be there himself to allow them to run for their lives).

    34. Re:What??!! by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      God yes, Jesus no. Am I wrong?

      Same guy. Jesus can only forgive sins because he's part of God / empowered to act as God.

      And it's possible to hate and love someone at the same time. It's easier to love someone and hate what they do.

      As for the rest of the post: Cool. :) I respect people who admit that they don't know, honestly, even if they favor His nonexistance.

      It's the prostletyizing atheists who claim to have sure knowledge of His nonexistance that irk me.

    35. Re:What??!! by Malcontent · · Score: 2

      "I personally find killing those people unacceptable."

      If this is so you are in the 5% minority of people who disagree with the actions taken by the US govt.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    36. Re:What??!! by jakew · · Score: 1

      I'll not argue with you about the more obscure interpretation of Christianity, since you obviously know what you're talking about, and I don't.

      It's the prostletyizing atheists who claim to have sure knowledge of His nonexistance that irk me.

      Ah, "evangelical atheists." Yes, I agree. I find people who insist on pressing their views annoying too. Religion (including "radical" atheism) relies upon faith. It is incredibly annoying when people try to push their faith onto oneself, even when one basically agrees with them.

    37. Re:What??!! by jakew · · Score: 1

      It is correct that I think the actions taken by the US government were excessive. However, I doubt that it is really as little as 5% who share this view. Can you direct me to your source for that? And would I be right in thinking that by people you mean US citizens?

    38. Re:What??!! by Malcontent · · Score: 2

      I was using 5% as a figuritive number the actual number may be as high as 10%. Yes I meant US citizens.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

  37. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  38. You gotta hand it to them... by Subcarrier · · Score: 5, Funny

    The personnel manning the stand must have balls bigger than their brains. This deep into hostile territory they ought to have air support.

    --
    "I have opinions of my own, strong opinions, but I don't always agree with them." -- George H. W. Bush
    1. Re:You gotta hand it to them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Air support will be provided by beer and burritos.

    2. Re:You gotta hand it to them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Man, I am going to clean up selling rotten fruit at the convention!

    3. Re:You gotta hand it to them... by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

      The personnel manning the stand must have boobs bigger than their brains. This deep into hostile territory they ought to have air support.

    4. Re:You gotta hand it to them... by seann · · Score: 1

      maybe it's the guy from the .NET launch, "DEVLOPERS DEVLOPERS DEVLOPERS!"

      He has enough BO for air strikes

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
    5. Re:You gotta hand it to them... by Chicane-UK · · Score: 2

      All they need to do is get Steve Ballmer up there.. he must have balls the size of melons (not literally), and would gladly take on any Linux zealot with some pep-talk about how great Microsoft products are :)

      --
      "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
    6. Re:You gotta hand it to them... by Locutus · · Score: 2

      It's all a training exercise for the latest Tiger-Team of Linux bashing salesmen. They need to make sure these guys won't cave under pressure so they are sending them off to Linux Expo.

      Or they just want to know exactly how many show up each day and get other stats from the organizers. Maybe the organizers should have a software bug and let Microsoft know that exactly 100 people showed each day of the event. When Microsoft complains, they can say they had a bug and will fix it for the next show. :)

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    7. Re:You gotta hand it to them... by Fissure_FS2 · · Score: 1

      Considering all the flying Windows logos I've seen in one of the screen savers, I don't think they'll have to worry.

      --
      My life's goal is to get a score of +3!
  39. I smell an ambush coming... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Watch out geeks, it may be a trap. Can anyone say Jihad XP.

    If you can't beat them, blow them up and kill them.

  40. BSD is dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that BSD's fate is tied to Apple Computer, it will die into the irrelevant ghetto that is the Apple community, that paltry 9% of users.

    1. Re:BSD is dead by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
      Is it 9%? I thought it used to be 5%... If it's 9% it sounds to me like they might actually be making a comeback...

    2. Re:BSD is dead by DesScorp · · Score: 1

      Mom! Taco left the door open again, and there's a troll in the house! You just wait 'till Dad gets home!

      --
      Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    3. Re:BSD is dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BSD's fate isn't "tied to Apple Computer."

      I will say, though, that I am getting PISSED with the Apple OS articles crowding things up at Daemon News.

      Go f'king away, MacHeads. We KNOW your OS died. You know it died. Quit trying to drag the world down with it.

  41. Microsoft Linux by MikesOnFire · · Score: 1

    Is this so impossible to imagine?

    Say that the leadership at some point looks at a there internal research and notices that Linux's market share is growing against Windows.

    So a batallion of MS programmers are thrown on the tast of creating a Linux distro that runs Office and some other MS apps (it would be much better that WINE).

    And the unintelligent masses leap on to this wonderful new technology called Linux brought to you by MS... ... it could happen.

    1. Re:Microsoft Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Let's replace the operating system in millions of computers with a new one, just so we can all run the same software as before. Whatever!

  42. Boycott the MS Booth(s) by darnellmc · · Score: 1

    The best thing that anyone going could do is to simply avoid the MS booth(s). Don't go to them and don't even look to see what they have to offer. Simply avoid anything with MS related to it and they will get the picture real quick.

    1. Re:Boycott the MS Booth(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like how everyone wanted to boycott Blizzard because it made them sound like their balls had dropped. Really, get a clue and realize that the term 'Slashdot Boycotts' is an oxymoron.

  43. *cough* *sputter* by Gannoc · · Score: 4, Insightful
    No doubt this means that the more childish among us will make us all look bad. Sigh.

    Isn't that usually you? Seriously, nothing personal, thats what the site is about, but your comments after most story submissions tend to represent the worst elitist, one sided opinions of the community.

    1. Re:*cough* *sputter* by mchappee · · Score: 2, Funny

      >Seriously, nothing personal, thats what the
      > site is about, but your comments after most
      > story submissions tend to represent the worst
      > elitist, one sided opinions of the community

      You've obviously never browsed below score threshold 2. Taco's editorial comments are very sane, grammatically superior, and thoroughly spell-checked compared to the LESS THAN 2 norm. Oh, and Taco has never pointed us at goatse.

      Matthew

      --
      /. finds me to be 20% Troll, 80% Funny
    2. Re:*cough* *sputter* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Bravo... mod this guy up, he hit the nail on the head.

    3. Re:*cough* *sputter* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're thinking of michael, Taco's comments aren't usually that bad

    4. Re:*cough* *sputter* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, really. It's Michael that gives Slashdot a bad name. Michael wants slashdot to become some kind of hangout for socialist, teenagers or something.

      It really doesn't matter though, because the vast majority of adults in the business community just laugh at slashdot anyway, if they've even heard of it.

    5. Re:*cough* *sputter* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whats so one sided about a convicted monopoly?
      oh..sorry to fuck up your day with the facts shithead.

    6. Re:*cough* *sputter* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something that's interesting to note. My new account is finally posting with the +1 bonus if I want it.

      I can only collect the necessary positive karma if I get a logged on account and set it to read only +2 and above comments. Otherwise, I tend to get drawn into the flamebait crap and end up with negative karma.

      Plus, the comments section of this site is so much more intelligent if you filter at 2. There was irony when I read at a level where my comments themselves wouldn't be visible, but now that is no longer the case.

      I also have it set to not display scores. If it's 2 or above who cares if the moderators pile further praise on it.

      (posting this as AC to preserve my precious karma)

  44. Rumor: by vegetablespork · · Score: 5, Funny

    Their booth will be right next to the exhibit floor exit, with a big sign that says "WE HAVE THE WAY OUT."

    --

    Call (206) 338-5780 COLLECT for information about a genuine BA, BS, MA, MS, MBA, or Ph.D.

    1. Re:Rumor: by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > Their booth will be right next to the exhibit floor exit, with a big sign that says "WE HAVE THE WAY OUT."

      Y'know, Bill's salesdroids always did remind me of the guy who ran the circus with the nice sign saying "THIS WAY TO THE EGRESS!"

    2. Re:Rumor: by cotu · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and they can probably reuse the rest of the whacko Exodus ex-gay screed:

      "You too can make your way out of the harmful
      Open-Source Lifestyle."

    3. Re:Rumor: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Later that afternoon, the sign is vandalized and pointed toward the MS booth: WE xxxx are on THE WAY OUT.

    4. Re:Rumor: by Buck2 · · Score: 1

      Wow! How do you possibly know this detail about a circus?

      --

      As my father lik@(munch munch)... ....
  45. Of course it won't happen but by sulli · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ya gotta admit that Office for Linux would be a useful thing to have around.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
    1. Re:Of course it won't happen but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      now that open office is out, i see no point. office 2000 is nice, but all the crap they put into it lowered the value of it

    2. Re:Of course it won't happen but by Moonshadow · · Score: 5, Funny
      ya gotta admit that Office for Linux would be a useful thing to have around

      Yeah, I've been needing something to load test my machine with.

    3. Re:Of course it won't happen but by llamalicious · · Score: 2

      indeed it would, wouldn't it.
      any you'd pay them for it too, wouldn't you?

      now think about that...

    4. Re:Of course it won't happen but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work in Linux as my primary OS all day and use vmware to run W2K/office. That's the ONLY reason I use vmware. I think the company that employs me (a biotech company) would be happy to purchase office for linux if it ran natively (personally, from past MS ports to Unix - solaris, I doubt it would be something that ran as well as the setup I have now). As it is, OpenOffice/StarOffice are ok, but mess some documents up.

      > indeed it would, wouldn't it.
      > any you'd pay them for it too, wouldn't you?
      >
      > now think about that...

    5. Re:Of course it won't happen but by setag · · Score: 1

      are you serious? Please say you don't really use linux.

  46. Ideas by MagPulse · · Score: 1

    They might set up laptops with shared source for anyone to browse. In a few seconds you could make yourself ineligible to ever work on a related open source project.

    They might further call for developers to port their shared source .NET CLR to Linux, claiming that it would be faster to port and superior to Mono due to more people (MS developers) having worked on it.

    1. Re:Ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you mean this? http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/dotnet/2002/07/01/ rotorlinux.html

  47. Why else would they be there? by jsimon12 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why does them pushing .NET not make sense? Gnome supports it and De Icaza love it. Hence my guess that Microsoft will be pushing .NET, cause I doubt they really "love" Linux.

    1. Re:Why else would they be there? by DrXym · · Score: 2
      There is a difference between loving the technology (the VM, the C# language, the classes) and loving how Microsoft are applying it.

      There is not a snowballs chance in hell that Microsoft would promote on .NET in any meaningful way on Linux. They might release a basic runtime on Linux so that a Windows machine can see and start/stop a few basic .NET services. They might also allow Linux users to use services running on the .NET. The important thing to note is Linux would be the client of a Windows-centric network. There is absolutely no chance of it happening the other way around. Microsoft would probably charge you a licence fee for the pleasure too.

      Mono on GNOME is unlikely to help either. It will allow you to run .NET apps, but forget about it offering open source versions of various Microsoft .NET services.

  48. Depends... by unformed · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who are you?

    Or, more specifically, male or female?

    1. Re:Depends... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think that distinction is enough to determine aesthetic goodness or badness, then you have not gazed into the nightmarish female rumps that I have. There are scary tushes in all genders, and a lot of them belong to geeks.

    2. Re:Depends... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please guy/gal, don't ruin the dream...

  49. commercially speaking, it makes sense by dikappa · · Score: 1

    I think we all know that in marketing "speaking about" is important.

    They probably will show nothing really interesting for the linux community, BUT ms will throw a clear message to the masses: "here we stand".

    Among other things, we all are now interested in what are they going to do at the expo... so we are "speaking about": MS marketing departement is really good. They just made a good point.

    Or are they going to show some new linux-compatible technology? Or a distribution? This is going to be the most exciting happening at LinuxExpo, i fear.

    --
    :dikappa
  50. Competion is good by crumbz · · Score: 2

    Not know what Microsoft will exhibit(Office XP for Linux?), I would guess that they view this as an attempt to get a feel for the crowds and a list of the attendees. Co-opting to show? Maybe. Or maybe they view the Linux market as mature enough to support porting their Windows apps.

    1. Re:Competion is good by mikethegeek · · Score: 2

      "Not know what Microsoft will exhibit(Office XP for Linux?), I would guess that they view this as an attempt to get a feel for the crowds and a list of the attendees."

      So as to market them heavily, particularly the less clueful (and more easily succeptable to "shiny things" upper managers) in the companies.

      In that sense, it makes some sense...

      Or maybe this is a BSA booth in disguise, they are showing up to take names for audits, "You don't have a license for that copy of Red Hat, HA!"

      --
      === The price of freedom is eternal vigilance
  51. A real LEGITIMATE reason for Microsoft to be there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Say what you will about all their software (the Soft in microsoft), but they do make some pretty decent keyboards and mice which Linux users can make use of.

    They'd best emphasize the hardware over the software; a Linux crowed is not the most recentive place for the software anyway.

  52. So? by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They've been running ads, along with UNISYS, for a while now, about a certain offering. Who doesn't expect this to be the focus of their exhibit?

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    1. Re:So? by prockcore · · Score: 2

      Does that mean that MS's booth is going to BE the emergency exit? Then MS will go and set a fire and then claim "We have the way out! Come to our booth!"

  53. MS OS-BSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The rumors about MS releasing a version of *nix
    have resurfaces recently. Let look at the dirt.

    Mac OS-X is based on FreeBSD
    MS has a version of Office for Mac OS-X
    MS FUD has been directed at Linux and GPL, not against BSD based OSs and Liciense software.

    What it adds up to is MS releasing it own verion of BSD, hoping to kill two (2) birds with one (1) stone:
    Apple's OS-X and Linux/GNU/GPL

  54. I doubt they'll use this as a stage for FUD.. by gatekeep · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... to do so would only result in no further invitations to similar conferences, and getting them bad press amongst a market I'm sure they see as potential customers.

    More likely, I expect they'll have information about their Microsoft Windows services for UNIX

    Showing off services for Unix goes much further toward generating revenue for Microsoft than trying to tell people why *nix is bad or somehow inferior. It actually shows that Microsoft cares about interoperability with *nix. True of false, that's probably the message they'll try to convey. I'll withold my opinions on the validity of that message.

    1. Re:I doubt they'll use this as a stage for FUD.. by gatekeep · · Score: 2

      Damn, I found an even better link just after posting. Sorry about that.

    2. Re:I doubt they'll use this as a stage for FUD.. by Zordak · · Score: 2

      If you've seen any of their "One Degree of Separation" ads in trade magazines recently, a new one features "One degree of separation between your Windows Server Hardcores and your UNIX Zealots," and is a plug for their UNIX integration services. My guess would be that this is exactly why they're there. They don't always like to admit it or make it too overly public, but MS has roots in Linux, just like almost every other software shop that's still alive.

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    3. Re:I doubt they'll use this as a stage for FUD.. by Cy+Guy · · Score: 2

      MS has roots in Linux, just like almost every other software shop that's still alive.

      I think you mean Unix, they had their own flavor of Unix once, XENIX. But NT/2000/XP aren't derived from this, they get their Unix like properties via their VMS heritage.

    4. Re:I doubt they'll use this as a stage for FUD.. by teslatug · · Score: 1

      I wonder how this compared to the cygwin tools...

    5. Re:I doubt they'll use this as a stage for FUD.. by Zordak · · Score: 2

      You are, of course, right. I meant UNIX. Saying most software has roots in Linux, which is all of 10 years old, is like saying the music industry has deep roots in the music of N'Sync and Brittney Spears :-)

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    6. Re:I doubt they'll use this as a stage for FUD.. by estoll · · Score: 1

      To start, the Microsoft version costs $99

      --
      http://www.askthevoid.com
    7. Re:I doubt they'll use this as a stage for FUD.. by fferreres · · Score: 2

      It actually shows that Microsoft cares about interoperability with *nix.

      Ok, I won't start this message with the usuall "Are you for real" or the likes. It doesn't work. I'll just point out that there's absolutely NO compatibility effort in the Microsoft side.

      All compatibility is provided by the open source community. Say the Samba server, the FAT32, VFAT, NTFS, the Terminal Server clients, and the list is long.

      Let's face it, they don't like it. Some people may try to convince you they are you fellows. They have some reason for behaving like that, and it's not for true friendship or for _mutual_ benefit.

      --
      unfinished: (adj.)
    8. Re:I doubt they'll use this as a stage for FUD.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > to do so would only result in no further invitations to similar conferences.

      Right, conference makers, whose only purpose in life is to spread the word, will earn less in the future by avoiding Microsoft, but they don't really care about that.

    9. Re:I doubt they'll use this as a stage for FUD.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being an old timer as well, I can see your point. Anybody who is accustomed to an old-school linux system (if you insist on it having a Linux kernal, try Slackware, otherwise go for Net or OpenBSD) will see all the flounce and flash of a 'current' Linux distro and think 'Pop culture' like N'Sync and Brittney. We old timers are comfortable at the command prompt, or at the most in an Xterm. My FVWM menu has Xterm and one or two other essentials and that's it.

      But do you really want to make such a comparison openly, and here on Slashdot? I sure don't. (so will remain A.C. for this comment)

    10. Re:I doubt they'll use this as a stage for FUD.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoops, I did the same thing.

      s/linux/unix/ in 'and old-school linux system'

    11. Re:I doubt they'll use this as a stage for FUD.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, I finally actually went and read that article on the "VMS heritage" of NT. What a crock of shit puff piece. You could cross out "VMS" and "Windows" for most of the comparisons and write in "Linux" and "Solaris". Some of the stunning similarities include:

      support for multiple processors
      virtual memory
      the ability to monitor processes
      kernel and user modes
      LRU based file cache
      memory mapped files
      allows process priorities to be raised
      asynchronous IO
      a backup program

      Really. Windows NT has a VMS heritage because both have a fucking backup program. Does any operating system in the last five years NOT have all of these features?

    12. Re:I doubt they'll use this as a stage for FUD.. by esarjeant · · Score: 0

      That almost makes sense; too bad the SFU is yet another example of a great set of utilities that Microsoft didn't write.

      At any rate, if this really is a showcase for XP embedded there better be some kind of Linux tie-in. Maybe show how you can develop XP-embedded apps on Linux? If they don't demonstrate some kind of capability on Linux, they have no place at the show.

      --

      Eric Sarjeant
      eric[@]sarjeant.com

    13. Re:I doubt they'll use this as a stage for FUD.. by Zordak · · Score: 2

      Yes, but you take my analogy too far. Even when I use RedHat with KDE, I have a console window open and do most of my work there. And I'm not even an old timer (maybe 2.5 - 3 years). The true extent of the analogy is simply that Linux has not been around long enough to be a common heritage to computer systems, just as the latest flash-in-the-pan pop star has not been around long enough to be a common heritage to the music industry.

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
  55. Perhaps... by bhsx · · Score: 0, Redundant

    They'll be announcing Office XP for Linux?

    --
    put the what in the where?
  56. Rember... by jabbadeznuts · · Score: 2, Informative

    that MS does have a unix kernel. They use it in thier migration from Unix to Windows stuff I think. MS does do some *NIX stuff, they just don't like to admit it. It will be interesting to see what they bring to the *NIX table though.

    1. Re:Rember... by gotak · · Score: 1

      They used to have a verion of UNIX remember? Not to mention they used to do all their work on unix based stations.

    2. Re:Rember... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they ain't havin no UNIX kernel, the NT kernel were written by the core persons that did create the VMS kernel - http://www.winntmag.com/Articles/Index.cfm?Article ID=4494=2
      - (just did a quick search)
      The NT kernel have a lot more similarities with VMS the UNIX

      and VMS is far from UNIX, however the NT kernel does have several "personalities" such as Win32, DOS and POSIX which you might call UNIX compatibility (an old and outdated version though: http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url= /library/en-us/vccore98/html/_core_port_from_unix_ to_win32.asp)

      Win3.x / Win9x / WinME is based on DOS

      Once upon a time they had Xenix though which later became SCO UNIX -> Caldera OpenUNIX (gasp!)

      actually NT, weren't suppose to be, MS saw UNIX as the technically supperior to DOS http://www.computerhope.com/unix/xenix.htm

      Yeah yeah, there are a whole bunch of FreeBSD code in NT, networking stack comes in mind, but there is no unix kernel... :) /Thomas

    3. Re:Rember... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't say it doesn't run on the UNIX kernel until you have seen the source code, which I doubt you have.

  57. One possibiltiy... Linux Business Unit? by Nomad7674 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Well, it would not be totally out of the realm of possibility that MS might form a Linux Business Unit in the same way they already have a Macintosh Business Unit. If they did that to churn out MS Office editions for Linux, it might head off the insurgency of OpenOffice and ThinkFreeOffice and maintain their place as the #1 provider of office software.

    Remember, in the end MS is out there to make money. Ruling the world is just a means to that end.

    1. Re:One possibiltiy... Linux Business Unit? by nullard · · Score: 1

      Well, it would not be totally out of the realm of possibility that MS might form a Linux Business Unit in the same way they already have a Macintosh Business Unit

      Microsoft has been writing Mac software longer than it has been writing Windows software. Microsoft Word came out for the Mac first. I remember using it on a Mac Plus long ago.

      In any case, I assume that Micrsoft will be selling something for Linux rather than trying to fight it openly at the expo. The former scenario is in line with their history, the latter is just silly.

      --


      t'nera semordnilap
    2. Re:One possibiltiy... Linux Business Unit? by Asprin · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I believe (based on my own highly irrational speculation as well as anecdotes from the MS & IBM OS/2 collaboration - where MS apparently understood OS/2 internals better than IBM's engineers ever did.) that MS probably does have a secret Linux unit operating right now tearing through the source code and gathering 'information' - hell, they probably know more about the Linux kernel than Linus does. I suspect they're also porting unofficial hush-hush Linux version of Office and IE, and probably also a .Net CLI, .Net server and Exchange Server, maybe even their own desktop environment running on top of X. With their R budget, they'd be nuts not to, especially considering that they consider Linux to be a threat.

      Now, for those of you who think I've gone all loopy: NO, I don't expect that we're ever going to see 'MS Office for Linux', 'IE for MS-XWindows' or 'MS Linux.net' or anything similar at Comp-USA. If any of this stuff exists, I am quite certain MS is working on it to make their own platform better, and not to join the Linux universe - look how they strung out the Java platform.

      --
      "Lawyers are for sucks."
      - Doug McKenzie
    3. Re:One possibiltiy... Linux Business Unit? by David+Off · · Score: 1
      MS probably does have a secret Linux unit... porting unofficial hush-hush Linux version of Office and IE, and probably also a .Net CLI, .Net server and Exchange Server, maybe even their own desktop environment running on top of X.

      Right, okay, that will be the same business unit that is helping the US military reverse engineer the software on that alien spacecraft at Roswell.

      David

    4. Re:One possibiltiy... Linux Business Unit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly, MS is about making money. Remember that MS Office now runs on OSX - how difficult would it be to port to Linux. MS turning up at LinuxWorld is a catch 22 - if eggs are thrown the alternative looks bad and if eggs arn't then it is seen as acceptance. Either way MS wins.

    5. Re: One possibiltiy... Linux Business Unit? by elemental23 · · Score: 1

      No need. Will Smith already hax0red it with a Powerbook.

      --
      I like my women like my coffee... pale and bitter.
    6. Re:One possibiltiy... Linux Business Unit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A major US company was concidering MS Exchange to replace its Unix-centric email and scheduling / groupware infrastructure. Exchange was doing fairly favorably until it hit the Solaris and Linux workstation issue. Solaris was handled with Exchange's web tool and IE for Solaris. Linux presented a challenge since a small number of webtool features were IE specific. Micorosoft offered source code and help to get the IE for Solaris base ported for the corporate Linux workstation build.

      IE on Linux doesn't sound so far fetched.

    7. Re:One possibiltiy... Linux Business Unit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given that IE exists for HP/UX as well I'd have through that all that would be needed to produce a Linux port would be a few #defines.

      So where is it?

      Hey, if Microsoft doesn't have the resources to do it they could release the source code so we can do the port for them ;-)

    8. Re:One possibiltiy... Linux Business Unit? by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      You're insane. Microsoft would not, and will not, waste their time writing software that runs on top of X. If they come out with a desktop environment for Linux, you can be guaranteed it'll be like Apple's GUI on OSX. It'll be a complete rewrite, without all the legacy mess that X (sadly) imposes.

    9. Re:One possibiltiy... Linux Business Unit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, and they will, sooner or later. If they can't kill Linux and there's money to be made off it as IBM and Sun and others seem to think, they'll eventually try and make money off it somehow. But I think they'd really rather just kill it if at all possible. Perhaps this is a sign that they're realizing Linux might not be killable.

    10. Re:One possibiltiy... Linux Business Unit? by RevLizard · · Score: 1

      My 2 cents... It would NOT surprise me in the least if MS was NOT building this shit as we speak (type). A good plan is malleable - if they lose their "little" case - they darned well better have contingency plans. Bill is hell-bent on taking over the world as we know it...and you KNOW he's got a plan regardless.

  58. It's funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Laugh!

  59. Trade shows by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    There are a few reasons for going to trade shows. so what has microsoft picked.

    Try to get people interested in your warez.

    Check out what the competition has to offer.

    Recruting new staff.

    Get a load of fit birds to strip so that no-one even bothers to leave you stand.

    hmmmmmmm........

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  60. Well obviosly their there to show off their GUI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since KDE continues to just rip it off why not show up and take credit for it.

  61. Thinkfree is misleading marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Went to Thinkfree, and buried in the site is the fact that I have to pay for it. Rename the thing Think50Bucks, instead of trying to cash in on the free software movement.

    1. Re:Thinkfree is misleading marketing by HiThere · · Score: 2

      Buried? It was on the page linked to! $49.something. They didn't mention the cost for shipping, handling, tax, etc., but that's usual. I didn't go any deeper, as I no longer have a Mac, but the price was right up front.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  62. Your sig by dimator · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    If slashdot sucks, why did you dupe their look and color scheme? Secondly, why did you do such a bad job at it?

    SlashdotSucks sucks.

    --
    python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    1. Re:Your sig by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

      If slashdot sucks, why did you dupe their look and color scheme?

      To try to get people to make accounts.

      Secondly, why did you do such a bad job at it?

      Because I suck.

      SlashdotSucks sucks.

      Most definately.

  63. I'll say this- by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 1

    I hope the MS booth persons have bullet-proof vests.

    It wouldn't surprise me in the least if some of the more, ah, vocal *nix folks get that hostile. Esp. if the MS booth is there to spread FUD....

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
  64. The top-10 list of reasons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. That $200000 prize for Linux on X-Box is just too tempting.

    2. Office on Linux.

    3. DirectX compatibility-layer for Linux.

    4. .Net for Linux.

    5. Finally, a unifying desktop environment for Linux: 'LIN32'.

    6. A new kernel, now featuring Palladium (tm).

    7. No product, they just want to say goodbye to all of us before new laws make Linux illegal. Possibly they'll be mooning _us_.

    8. The booth contains a powerful explosive, set to go off as soon as a keep-alive timer from a PC running Windows XP fails. Talk about a 'blue screen of death'...

    9. They are not yet aware that they are invited to a _Linux_ expo. It is all a weird joke by Larry Ellison.

    and finally... (drumroll please!)

    10. They have ported Microsoft Bob to Linux!

  65. Correct me if I am wrong, but... by 13Echo · · Score: 1

    Didn't Microsoft announce some time ago that they were going to open source some of their software to educational facilities for students? Maybe that has something to do with it. Perhaps they have some news that they are going to use to appeal to some of the open source fanatics to try to convince them to use the Windows platform?

    This will be interesting to say the least.

  66. ::Clueless:: by Lando · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Well I am clueless as to how this is news... It's not really important as far as I can tell... I don't use Linux to spite Microsoft, I use Linux so that I can get my work done. What does it matter what Microsoft does?

    Granted buying laws and that is important to know about, but the fact that they are getting a booth at a Linux Expo doesn't really matter other than something to gossip about.

    ie Nothing here move on.

    --
    /* TODO: Spawn child process, interest child in technology, have child write a new sig */
    1. Re:::Clueless:: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason it's news is that Microsoft has been openly and outspokenly hostile to Linux in the very recent past. And now they're going to a Linux trade show. It's odd, to say the least.

  67. Well... by NetJunkie · · Score: 2

    At least there is one addition this year. Last LinuxWorld I was at was terrible. Was half the previous size and the remaining companies were just holding on.

    Pretty soon they'll be holding it at the VFW...

  68. Trojan? by bpfinn · · Score: 1

    Obviously this is some kind of trojan or rootkit. We better check our logs to see what happened.

  69. It can be useful if MS shows up by dr_dank · · Score: 1

    They can get our backs in case the Mac kids come over to start sh*t.

    --
    Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
  70. microsoft marketing guys are bored. by rhyac · · Score: 1

    microsoft: lets have some fun with the linux nuts. *poke* ... *poke* *poke*

  71. Re:BSD is not dead by BluSkreen · · Score: 1

    Which is more users that were using Unix on the desktop before OSX came out.

    If anything, OSX will help take Unix to the mainstream. That's something that happened on release and that Linux and the other *nixes haven't been able to acheive in several years.

  72. Re:I don't really get it(MS-BSD) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You guys don't seem to get it, It is not MS Linux, it's MS-OSX. They already have a native version of
    Office for OSX. If Apple can create a version of FreeBSD, way is so hard to believe that MS wouldn't
    release thier own version of *BSD to torpedo
    OSX and Linux.

  73. what about... by Samari711 · · Score: 1

    a hypnotist? brainwash everyone in the place into thinking that open source is bad. God knows they've got enough money to make a brainwashing mashine

    --

    I never said I was smart, I just said I was smarter than you

  74. Star Trek VI? by dimator · · Score: 4, Funny

    Does anyone else picture RMS and BillG sitting at a dinner, speaking of the Undiscovered Country?

    --
    python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    1. Re:Star Trek VI? by decipher_saint · · Score: 1

      "You haven't heard web development until you've heard it scripted in VB!"

      --
      crazy dynamite monkey
    2. Re:Star Trek VI? by FTL · · Score: 2
      > Does anyone else picture RMS and BillG sitting at a dinner, speaking of the Undiscovered Country?

      RMS: We need breathing room!

      BillG: 640K ought to be enough for anyone.

      --
      Slashdot monitor for your Mozilla sidebar or Active Desktop.
    3. Re:Star Trek VI? by Chicane-UK · · Score: 2

      RMS : "I have never trusted Microsoft, and I never will.. I can never forgive them for the death of GNU."

      BillG : "Crrrry havoc, and let slip Windows Longhorn!"

      Pfft :)

      --
      "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
    4. Re:Star Trek VI? by extrasolar · · Score: 2

      Did someone invite RMS too?

      What are they planning, a nuclear explosion?

  75. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  76. Suspect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I've heard mention of this from a few Microsoft'ers... it's likely they'll be unveiling the Microsoft apps layer that sits on top of the Linux kernel. This makes me shudder... In the span of 20 years they've come up with a metric ton of software through embrace an extend, it would be unwise to presume that there is no possibility of a world where the "Linux" product in the eyes of the consumer has turned into another version of "Windows" that has Microsoft apps written on top of the Linux kernel...

  77. Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX by nutznboltz · · Score: 2, Informative

    Are they going to be plugging this creature? They are testing it against RedHate Linux.

    1. Re:Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX by rasjani · · Score: 2
      Interesting on that given site is that they are openly saying: "Interop Systems: GPL Source Code".

      Check out that "Related sites & Resources box".

      --
      yush
  78. I have one thing to say: by sloanster · · Score: 1

    Keine mitleid fuer microsoft!

  79. prolly showing off bits of new OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    haven't you all heard? MS new OS is going to have an underlying unix like kernel....sorta like MacOS X I guess.

    1. Re:prolly showing off bits of new OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this the same Mac OSX that M$ has ported
      Office (OfficeX) to?

      And what OS is OSX based on? And What license?

      Which means that M$ is already halfway home?
      Why not a MS *BSD base Office dedicated workstation?

  80. My fear by nullard · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My fear is that Microsoft writes something like wine and sells it for Linux. They don't need you to buy their OS, they get you to buy their propriety compatibility layer and their software. Just think how many places that use Linux will be willing to pay $50 for the ability to use Windows apps. Microsoft will make money, and increase market penetration w/out giving anything to the community. Getting Linux users to run Microsoft software may be their first step in fighting Linux.

    --


    t'nera semordnilap
    1. Re:My fear by JordoCrouse · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Just think how many places that use Linux will be willing to pay $50 for the ability to use Windows apps. Microsoft will make money, and increase market penetration w/out giving anything to the community.

      Lemme ask you something.. What the hell is wrong with Microsoft, as a commercial corporation, writing an emulator layer for Linux? They're not going to be able to take over the kernel. They're not going to be able to force their opinions or policies on anyone who doesn't use their brand of emulation, and to tell you the truth (no offense to the WINE folks), I'll bet that they will write a pretty damn good emulator. The only thing evil and borgish thing that they might do is to modify their Windows software to only work on *their* emulator. And I bet if they knew how to prevent WINE from running Windows apps, they would probably have already done it.

      There is a huge market for Windows apps, even amongst Linux geeks. It might be a game that only runs on Windows, or it might be an specialized app, or it might be solitare for all I care. The fact of the matter is that there was obviously a need for WINE / WinForLinux / VMWare.

      As for not giving back to the community - well, there is a long list of folks who have taken from the community without giving back. Part of software freedom is the understanding that there will always be people who take and never give.

      --
      Do you have Linux and a DotPal? Click here now!
    2. Re:My fear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what .NET is.

      It's not so much a control of the language or the VM, it's the Runtime Library (API) what MS wants to control.

    3. Re:My fear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      This would NOT be as bad thing as you may think.

      There are many applications that are windows only and require windows to actually be running to install them.

      In fact, if there was a compatability layer that was a stable as windows (hush now ;-) ), i would be able to move more of our systems over to linux. There is only 1 real piece of software left that I can not find an equivilant for on linux or get working through wine. And because of its dependancy on windows messaging and windows media player it is unlikely that it will work with wine in the near future. And it happens to be a mission critical piece of software.

      AC.

    4. Re:My fear by MiTEG · · Score: 1

      Never going to be able to take over the kernel? Never say never. Microsoft could very well require their own propriety modules be compiled into the kernel in order to get their software to work. I really wouldn't put it past them.

      --
      The future isn't what it used to be.
    5. Re:My fear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a countermeasure. If ms tries something like this, Open source zealots could try something many electronics manufacturers have been doing for years: test all posible interactions between MS libraries and the kernal. Find one combination that breaks it. Force the kernal to try that particular combo on all programs. The best part is, we can claim its ms's shitty software thats crashing.

    6. Re:My fear by MadAhab · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I agree, up to a point. But an emulator might be an interesting "viral" technique for them. For one thing, it gets onto the desktops where linux might be a threat, like in large installations of workstations for, i dunno, the peruvian govt.

      Once they get into your machine that way, well, there's all kinds of little features, e.g. sound, that might "accidentally" break here and there unless you are using a particular linux distro. With whom they would naturally have a partnering agreement, since somebody's got to do the support for that. What's next? Gee, you need to use this "drm-approved" sound driver if you want our emulator to work. Sorry. Pretty soon they've taken over your allegedly free system in any way they please.

      It doesn't have to work all that well. It shouldn't, in fact. It should work just well enough that it gets adopted, but badly enough to make sure it doesn't outshine their own OS.

      --
      Expanding a vast wasteland since 1996.
    7. Re:My fear by nullard · · Score: 1

      What the hell is wrong with Microsoft, as a commercial corporation, writing an emulator layer for Linux?

      There isn't anything wrong with it per se. What I suspect is their motives. Other companies making Linux software are usually very interested in having Linux prosper. I don't think Microsoft is likely to take that view. Based on their previous statements and actions, I think that their goal is to destroy Linux.

      Additionally, I dislike the fact that Microsoft is exhibiting at a Linux tradeshow after calling the GPL "viral" and producing much anti-Linux FUD. Don't forget that they are after UNIX too. Remember their whole "We Have The Way Out" campaign?

      I don't feel that Microsoft is entering the LinuxWorld Expo in good faith.

      --


      t'nera semordnilap
    8. Re:My fear by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Oh, i can name quite a few things which do this already. Vmware, iptables, loads of stuff. Why is it ok for them to do this and not MS?
      i really wish you ppl would get a proper arguement for once in a while.

    9. Re:My fear by GravySkin · · Score: 0

      shh... you dumbass. Don't let them know how to beat us.

      --
      "never met a Microsoft zealot"
    10. Re:My fear by happyclam · · Score: 3, Funny

      ... my fear is that Microsoft writes a Linux emulator for Windows.

      <theory type="conspiracy">
      They will make it available for free to show the world how open they are. They will make it so easy to download and install that every eMachines owner will get it immediately. Hell, they may even include it with their next Windows update.

      It will be SO buggy and error prone that all those Windows users will conclude that they will never switch to Linux.
      </theory>

      --
      He looked at me and said, "Kid, we don't like your kind, and we're gonna send your fingerprints off to Washington."
    11. Re:My fear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Other companies making Linux software are usually very interested in having Linux prosper.

      Nope, sorry, most commercial companies making software for linux want their software to sell. They don't care if it is selling for linux, Windows, Sun, Plan 9, Xinu, etc. If the software sells they make money. They will contribute to the linux community as long as it reflects well on their profits.

      Why does everyone suddenly think companies are community minded and friendly helpful entities because they develop for linux?(Think oracle)

    12. Re:My fear by adam613 · · Score: 2

      This is an interesting thought, but it will never work for Microsoft. In my experience, most Linux users are much less tolerant of pieces of software that don't work together than most Windows users are. If I have to use a certain distro for a piece of software, then I won't be using that piece of software (especially since I use LFS). This could change if hordes of people suddenly started using Linux overnight, but that isn't going to happen. People who were already considering switching would start to do so, learn how things work in the world of Linux (where software must cooperate in order to be accepted), and be all ready to train the next set of newbies. If Microsoft understood how to penetrate that kind of market, they would have destroyed Linux already (not to mention Apple).

    13. Re:My fear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      let me guess ... a netmeeting like conferencing app ? mission critical ? huh ? just get a conferencing system on linux to replace it.

    14. Re:My fear by sheldon · · Score: 2

      At least you labeled your FUD correctly and honestly. :-)

    15. Re:My fear by JordoCrouse · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Gee, you need to use this "drm-approved" sound driver if you want our emulator to work. Sorry. Pretty soon they've taken over your allegedly free system in any way they please.

      The important thing is that Microsoft would be entering this thing as a player on equal footing with other competitors. In the past, Microsoft has been a competitor, but has also been the ruling body for the competition itself. Products like WordPerfect would come in, and lose because Microsoft could change the underlying operating system to suit their whims.

      Now, I understand that they can still rise to the top of the emulator market, because after all, only they have access to the secret APIs that even the WINE folks can only dream about. And I understand that they will do everything to try to switch the situation over to their favor.

      But two important things still remain - if you choose not to buy into the Microsoft way of life, you can still use Linux, becuase while Microsoft can play games in their little corner of the Linux world, they still can't influence change in the kernel without giving it back to the community.

      There is only one Windows, and it comes from a single point somewhere in Washington. You either use Windows from Microsoft or you don't use it at all. There are multiple Linux distros, so you are not forced to use the Microsoft approved (TM) distro if you don't want to (and I expect that if they play their usual games, then few people will want their distro, even if it means using a less compatible solution).

      --
      Do you have Linux and a DotPal? Click here now!
    16. Re:My fear by erat · · Score: 2

      Man, I want some of what you're smokin', dude!

      The single biggest hinderance in the adoption of Linux as a viable desktop OS is most likely its inability to run MS applications efficiently. WINE comes close (CodeWeaver's version especially), but it still isn't "there". And don't give me a bunch of hooey about VMWare; that's not emulation, that's actually running Windows. A clean emulation layer that doesn't require hundreds of megs of disk space and costs about $50 would be a friggin' GODSEND for Linux. I hope to hell they actually do that... I'd be one of the first people to buy the damn thing!

    17. Re:My fear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What the hell is wrong with Microsoft, as a commercial corporation, writing an emulator layer for Linux?"

      I think his first post answered that question fairly clearly.

      Microsoft is a corporation with a consistant and proven track record of locking you in, then once your locked in, bilking you for all you're worth and dictating to you what features you want. Microsoft is a horrible corporation that highlights everything that is wrong with the freemarket.

      And before you Microschlong sucking weenie boys out there start asking like morons "What's wrong with them trying to make a profit?" the answer is simple... Let them make a profit by fulfilling existing needs, instead of creating new needs(read: incompatibility) in order to force you to fork over more cash to fix their manufactured need. Planned obsolescence is why I won't buy a Chrysler, GM, and most Fords, and given Microsofts *CONSISTANT* track record of demonstrating that this is indeed their philosophy, it's why I militantly oppose Microsoft. They are not good for America, for freedom, or a free market.

      Oh, and PPTP sucks giant donkey balls. And IE does not explore everything on the internet, therefore, it's name is false advertising.

    18. Re:My fear by gmack · · Score: 2

      If MS does that we win.. think about it.

      Why don't more people use Linux? no commercial apps.

      Why don't we have commercial apps? Not enough people use Linux.

      It's a circular problem that would be fixed the minute somone has a working emulator.

      Installed base == native apps.

    19. Re:My fear by iamwhatiseem · · Score: 1

      We have talked about this a number of times. If I was M$ that is EXACTLY what I would do. They are STUPID for fighting Linux. I would love it. We have a whole set of folks that we wish we could have Linux as their desktop, but because of one or two Winapps we have to stick with Windoze. I for one would pay that $50 per seat, why not? It would be less than the dreaded XP, and at the same time greatly improve security since they would now have Linux as their OS. I don't understand your fear at all.

    20. Re:My fear by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 2
      The only thing evil and borgish thing that they might do is to modify their Windows software to only work on *their* emulator. And I bet if they knew how to prevent WINE from running Windows apps, they would probably have already done it.
      Actually, I'm somewhat frightened by the fact that Microsoft has not made any attempt at all to either kill the WINE project or prevent their software from running on it. It kind of makes me think that they've got an 'ace' which they're ready to unleash just as soon as WINE finally starts to become usable by non-techies.

      What will it be? Do they have some really great legal maneuver so unstoppable that they're confident enough to rely on it? Or do they plan on making the next version of Office depend on some weird crypto chain that only Genuine Microsoft Windows can authenticate? Even worse, will the next version of Visual Studio generate applications that do this, so even third-party apps stop running on WINE?

      Yeah, I'm paranoid. WINE is finally getting to the point where it's usable; I think it's entirely possible that within the next year it's going to start approaching the level of accuracy OS/2 had in running Windows apps. The fact that Microsoft appears ok with this so far is extremely suspect.
      --
      Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
    21. Re:My fear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of us would rather emulate a machine when they're forced to use Windows applications. At least then you have a good chance that any malicious code you may execute will remain contained at that layer.

      Of course you could run all your Win32 API required applications as separate user and group context, but there are still nasty things that can be done often times (depending on your setup), and you don't have the ability to simply 'power off' your VM and be back exactly where you were (no matter how stupid of a thing you just did) in no time.

    22. Re:My fear by Stackis · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I wonder is Richard works for Micro$shit...I mean $oft...

      --

      "Look where we worship" -- Jim Morrison
    23. Re:My fear by MiTEG · · Score: 2
      I didn't say it was bad thing only if Microsoft does it. My point is that it is entirely possible for Microsoft to require some pretty major changes to the kernel for any software they create to work, and there really isn't much we can do to avoid it. The reply was only to point out my disagreement with the statement they're not going to be able to take over the kernel.

      Oh, BTW, who is "you ppl"? I just want to know what group you're trying to classify me under ;).

      --
      The future isn't what it used to be.
    24. Re:My fear by MonMotha · · Score: 1

      iptables is included with the kernel. It is GPLed and can even be compiled in statically if you don't like modules. It's hardly proprietary to a company (proprietary in the sense that it won't load on other OSes, but would you expect a linux network card driver to load on anything but a linux kernel?)

      --MonMotha

    25. Re:My fear by MonMotha · · Score: 1

      Remember that loading proprietary modules now "taints" your kernel and that non GPLed modules can't use GPLONLY symbols. This means that if MS wants to do something like load an entire binary compatibility layer, they might very well have to write a lot of stuff themseleves and end up with a rather large kernel module (which linux people generally do not like). Also, sicne they "taint" the kernel, they automagically get the backlash from users when their system crashes since it COULD be the Microsoft stuff. See the problems people have with the crummy (stability/OSS wise, not speed wise) nVidia drivers.

      --MonMotha

    26. Re:My fear by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      my disagreement with the statement they're not going to be able to take over the kernel.
      Ok ok :) well, i dont see what a few modules or patched code is going to do to take over the kernel which ever way they pitch it. Maybe they could break stuff already in the kernel, tho i severly doubt this. From my point of view, MS can bring a hell of a lot to Linux that we need, especially in compatability arenas.

      Oh and i wasnt strictly classifying you, jsut trying to put across that the majority of moaners out there dont actually have a arguement, jsut more of a "i use this, and everyone else is doing that..... so ill do it". I bet they have fights about which is the better cola, Coke or Pepsi ;)

    27. Re:My fear by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      ok i got that wrong, i meant to say ipchains. The thing i hate, is yes it may be in the kernel code itself, but if i do it as a module and load it, it warns me that the license is going to taint the kernel. Like its as if i care. I chose to use that software, i dont want to be "warned" every time i load it like im a kid. I find that worse than some of the stuff MS do, like product activation. At least MS doesnt warn me every time i load a peice of software that they dont approve of it.

    28. Re:My fear by MonMotha · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's probably a bug. I'm pretty sure ipchains is GPLed (it was in 2.2.x), so that compatibilty module is probably old and unupdated and needs to declare it's liscense as GPLed.

      Also, I guess you've never had Win2k bitch you out for loading an unsigned driver until you dig around and disable the warning? I bet there's a command line flag for insmod/modprobe to disable that, or just use an older version of modutils that still works and doesn't include the kernel tainting info :)

      --MonMotha

    29. Re:My fear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of us would rather run the real OS rather than through a clumpsy emulator requiring tons of RAM and disk space. VMWare is a nice toy for kids but far from anything useful actually.

    30. Re:My fear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we can?t get them out well breed them out.

    31. Re:My fear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coke is better fucker!

    32. Re:My fear by SirRichardPumpaloaf · · Score: 1

      To whatever extent Microsoft is worried about Linux, that worry is confined to the server room where WINE is not an issue. Nobody would use WINE to run IIS or SQL Server on Linux, they'd use a native application instead. Linux+WINE replacing Windows for general desktop use is not really a legitimate threat.

    33. Re:My fear by SirRichardPumpaloaf · · Score: 1

      ...and then they can tell all of their clients, "You must install Linux and this pre-alpha Sourceforge conferencing project, otherwise we can no longer do business with you." Yep, easy as pie.

    34. Re:My fear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my experience, most Linux users are much less tolerant of pieces of software that don't work together than most Windows users are.

      I have found the exact opposite. I have seen many Linux users happily use OSS products that have missing or broken features that absolutely drive me wild, while they don't even notice. Perhaps it's because I've been spoiled by a lot of expensive commercial programs, and they don't know what they're missing. Either way, I could not put up with half the stuff that happens when you use Linux as a desktop.

      However, if you want to talk about finicky users, Mac users in my opinion are the absolute least tolerant. I have seen Mac people toss expensive sofware in the garbage because the window refreshes too slowly when clicked and dragged around the screen.

    35. Re:My fear by tunah · · Score: 2

      It will be SO buggy and error prone that all those Windows users will conclude that would feel right at home on linux.

      --
      Free Java games for your phone: Tontie, Sokoban
    36. Re:My fear by BJH · · Score: 1

      1) ipchains is GPL'd; it was the default in 2.2.
      2) The 'taint' message is meant to let you know that you can't expect any support from the kernel developers if you load a non-free module.
      3) ipchains probably hasn't been updated to include the correct license markers, as iptables is the default in 2.4.

    37. Re:My fear by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      OS/2 had an emulation layer that allowed it to run Windows 16 bit apps. What that accomplished was it took away all motivation to write native OS/2 productivity apps. That was one of the things that killed OS/2.

    38. Re:My fear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      aahahahhaa, you almost mixed up microsoft and microSHIT!!!!!! I'm going to start using Linux now, you guys are so clever!!!

    39. Re:My fear by SCHecklerX · · Score: 2
      Lemme ask you something.. What the hell is wrong with Microsoft, as a commercial corporation, writing an emulator layer for Linux?

      Part of the reason OS/2 died is the fact that since it ran windoze software, developers saw no need to create the superior native apps for it (protected memory, re-usable objects, very good threading, etc). Then when win95 came out, guess what...none of the windoze stuff designed for the 'new and improved' windoze would run on OS/2.

      Microsoft could do exactly the same thing by running stuff on linux, and then changing everything to break it. They basically released windoze 3.11 to break OS/2's 'for windows' version in the early 90's.

      People who care about running windoze on linux, or porting windoze stuff to linux instead of doing it the 'unix way' (small tight apps that excel at a specific task, easily chained together or embedded within one another) really bother me a lot.

      Linux needs quality native stuff. Not windoze stuff running on top of it. Not bloated all-in-one crap.

    40. Re:My fear by marhar · · Score: 2
      It's here

      "With Windows Services for UNIX 3.0, you can optimize existing investments in UNIX infrastructure and applications while capitalizing on Windows innovation."
    41. Re:My fear by 8bahl · · Score: 1

      Viral is right... Their emulation will have a EULA clause in it stating they may install LRM software. (Linux Removal Manager) and install Windows in it's place...

    42. Re:My fear by messiertom · · Score: 1

      Ooh, posting anonymously... I'm gonna stop using Linux now, you guys are so clever!!!

    43. Re:My fear by Analog+Penguin · · Score: 1

      Obviously none of them used Mac OS X on a G3 :)

      I liked it, but its slowness--while not prohibitive--just got annoying eventually.

    44. Re:My fear by DoctorFrog · · Score: 1
      Do they have some really great legal maneuver so unstoppable that they're confident enough to rely on it? Or do they plan on making the next version of Office depend on some weird crypto chain that only Genuine Microsoft Windows can authenticate?

      Yes and Yes. The first is Fritz Hollings's DTBC... DTC... DT... oh you know the one I mean.

      (I'm so glad I live in South Carolina, just so I can vote for whoever is running against that idiot. The bill itself is bad enough, but making me type that abbreviation out every time I write a letter to the editor is adding injury [carpal tunnel] to insult.)

      The second is apparently a "feature" of Palladium.

    45. Re:My fear by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      At least the driver signing is based on more than "oohhhh we dont like your license". Driver signing is there for stability reasons, and it actually does a good job. I use all signed drivers, and my system is as stable as my linux or openbsd box. Driver signing doesnt take offence to the license the code is under, just the fact that it may not be as stable as it could be.

    46. Re:My fear by MonMotha · · Score: 1

      The kernel tainting thing was put into linux because RMS complained as I recall. The GPL doesn't like letting other liscenses get a free ride, so they had to make the GPLONLY thing available to developers.

      One could argue that linux also does this for stability though. Before, the only linux kernel drivers you'd ever see were written by linux kernel hackers and were GPLed or under a similar liscense that made the source available. Now, it's not uncommon to see binary only kernel modules (often using wrappers to load them to take into account differing kernel versions). These drivers aren't under the control of any linux developer and haven't been checked over for stability. Basically, the kernel taint message is warning you that "by loading this, your kernel may become unstable and we can't do a thing about it, so don't bother complaining" since kernel modules can do basically anything to the, well, kernel (when loaded, a kernel module becomes a part of the kernel).

      --MonMotha

    47. Re:My fear by RevLizard · · Score: 1

      Unless, of course, one chooses to bastardize and/or create new "de facto" standards that make everything prior passe.

    48. Re:My fear by jakew · · Score: 1

      Has anyone looked at the FreeBSD .NET compatibility library that MS wrote? Could this be the beginning of such a product?

    49. Re:My fear by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      i can see where your coming from, and accept the validity of your point. Thing is, the message you are presented with moans about the license, and only the license. It says nothing about stability or what not, jsut that the license may taint the kernel.
      Also one more little thing, if as you say, the GPL doesnt like letting other licenses have a free ride, that in what way is that any different to MS denying you from adding stuff to their kernel unless you abide by their licenses? I thought the general idea of the GPL was that if i altered the code, and distributed it i would have to release the modifications as src. Now kernel modules are a bit different, cause they dont modify the origional code, yet still work with it. Now if this is true, then what u were saying is basically GPL zealots syaing "everyone who adds stuff should use the license we tell them to use" which totally negates the point of the GPL, which is choice.

    50. Re:My fear by Vulture_ · · Score: 1
      I'll bet that they will write a pretty damn good emulator.
      They'll have to make it worse than the OS it's emulating (in order to avoid having it compete with Windows). To do that it'd have to suck harder than the first version of dbx.
      The only thing evil and borgish thing that they might do is to modify their Windows software to only work on *their* emulator. And I bet if they knew how to prevent WINE from running Windows apps, they would probably have already done it.
      They've already tried damn hard to do it. As you can see, they've failed. The reason is that the WINE developers are quite capable of adapting to whatever MS throws at them.

      For these reasons, WINE will always be better than anything MS comes up with.

      --

      The only way the typical /.er can pick up a chick is with a forklift. -- AC

    51. Re:My fear by sql*kitten · · Score: 2

      My fear is that Microsoft writes something like wine and sells it for Linux.

      I don't get why this would be a problem - that's exactly how IBM got Linux running on their mainframes, running Linux within an LPAR. And then the Slashbots are all, like, hooray, IBM supports Linux!

    52. Re:My fear by scaryman · · Score: 1

      no, pepsi is:)

    53. Re:My fear by hviezda14 · · Score: 1

      Definitly Coke ... ;)

  81. wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The site www.linuxworldexpo.com is running Microsoft-IIS/4.0 on NT4/Windows 98.

    Go, Linux! Rule the web! Go, go, go! Oh, wait... damn.

    1. Re:wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm... maybe that explains why the pages render the way they do?

  82. Now would it not be nice by Archfeld · · Score: 2

    if the M$ booth was politely ignored as offtopic :)

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  83. It's worse than I thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    details about their enterprise wide lisencing schemas

    You need to run a SQL database just to keep track of the licensing?

    1. Re:It's worse than I thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no its a Licensing SERVER complete with database , OS and connectivity.

    2. Re:It's worse than I thought by thegoldenear · · Score: 1

      you really *do* aswell, there was one in NT4 under Control Panel

    3. Re:It's worse than I thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it runs on the Access database...EEW! Fugly.

  84. Bottom 10 Reasons by AtariAmarok · · Score: 2, Funny

    10. Bill's wallet is a little heavy. What better to do than leave a couple of billion at the Sourceforge booth?

    9. Steve Ballmer has a pengiun fetish. It's just not the same since "Bloom County" was cancelled. Time to get another fix.

    8. They think it is a Microsoft expo to which some Linux folks have been invited.

    7. Microsoft loves trekkies. Going to be a lot of them there at any Linux event.

    6. Its like "A Christmas Carol". The Ghosts of OS's Past, Present, and Future have finally convinced Ebenezer Gates of the error of his way.

    5. Due to budget cuts in Redmond, they are really sending the booth crew to collect a load of free pens from the other booths in order to supply the home office.

    2. (don't look for #4 and #3. They were lost due to an XP bluescreen). They are there to market the amazing new LinuXbox.

    1. Yes, certainly. Giving out free copies of those surplus Windows 3.11 5.25" floppies will win over all of those Linux hippies.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  85. SPIES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My guess would be that they still haven't figured out this whole concept of "Open Source", and that their booth will really just be a front so their spies can sneak and "steal" some highly-coveted source code that actually works!

  86. Tradeshow Giveaways.... by Theologian · · Score: 1, Troll


    I'm sure Microsoft will be there to present their latest virus vulnerability.

    With all their marketing $$, I hear they might be giving away free bugs at their booth this year..... YIPPIE!!!

    --

    Crapdot
    News from birds. Stuff that splatters.
  87. Huge Announcement! by coene · · Score: 1

    My guess is that Microsoft is there to announce their formal adoption of Linux, and replacement of all future server products with Linux based solutions, with the next generation of Desktops being based upon Lindows.

    That or they will have strippers, so that nobody visits any of the other booths.

  88. Prime booth location, too! by dstone · · Score: 2

    Microsoft's Booth is right between "Cybozu Corporation" and "LTrix Engineering". Oooo. Prestigious location.

  89. Dumbass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Spreading FUD doesn't look bad unless you expose it as FUD; and people aren't going to take egg-throwing idiots like yourself seriously - you're just going to make the people that are actually trying to dispel the FUD look like idiots by association.

    In other words, by acting like an ass, you've already given up. Congratulations. Enjoy your continued Microsoft monopoly...

  90. 9% or 5% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is 5% if you count the people that user Apple computers. It is 9% if you count also the users who bought macs cuz they look so cool but have never turned them on.

  91. I'm not going! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not going! there's liable to be violence, or dare I say it, a riot?

  92. Probably the whole idea: by talks_to_birds · · Score: 1
    "...No doubt this means that the more childish among us will make us all look bad. Sigh..."

    Set up a situation in which a few people, freely speaking their own minds, are spun by the Micro$oft flacks into FUD for consumption by the various Micro$oft mouthpieces: ZDNet, et al...

    Kinda takes trolling to a whole new level.

    t_t_b

    --
    I'm on PJ's "enemies" list! Are you?
  93. The call to booth sales by mckwant · · Score: 2

    Microsoft Mktng Geek: "Hi, this is Microsoft. We'd like to buy a booth at LinuxWorld."

    LinuxWorld Sales Geek: "Damn kids, quit calling here. I don't know who the hell you're trying to amuse. It's not funny, and you're wasting my time."

    You KNOW this happened.

    --
    ceci n'est pas un sig.
  94. here is by waspleg · · Score: 4, Funny

    a map of their exhibit from linuxtoday.com linking to linuxworldexpo

    http://www.linuxworldexpo.com/linuxworldexpo/v31 /f loorplan/floorplan.cvn?b=224&amp;exbID=118

    might be helpful so you know where *NOT* to be standing when the ticking mechnical suicide penguin bombs come waddling in

  95. Welcome to the Church of Linux by Anonymous+Shitbag · · Score: 0, Troll
    Where anything involving personal encounters with Microsoft reps is "us vs. them," people try to win "converts," and everyone is either gay or involuntarily celibate.

    Don't believe me? Read the rest of the comments in this article.

    1. Re:Welcome to the Church of Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Troll" heh. What else would you expect. Any semblense of thought or reality? Hell no. It's all rah rah, kick in the face. One big soccer brawl that causes the game to be cancelled. Slash should just shut down, Linux credibility would skyrocket.

  96. Microsoft Linux by gnugnugnu · · Score: 1

    Conspiracy theories on this topic over at newsforge.net
    TuxReports has "the scoop" ;)

  97. Exhibit by cmdr_forge · · Score: 0

    Stick them right next to the rms booth see how long that lasts

  98. I disagree? by drew_kime · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Remember, in the end MS is out there to make money. Ruling the world is just a means to that end.

    Then why is Bill giving away so much to charities? Just for PR? Maybe.

    I think it's more likely that the Microsoft coporate personality is more like a control freak than just greedy. Money is the way they maintain control, not the other way around. Remember, money is power.

    --
    Nope, no sig
    1. Re:I disagree? by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Bill Gates is NOT Microsoft. What he does with his own (pracitcally unlimited) money is one thing; he can use $100 bills as toilet tissue for all I care (although I admit that I'm glad he's spending some of his billions on charity).

      What Microsoft does with its money is quite another thing, and is subject to intense scrutiny from investors, analysts, and federal investigators. Investors and analysts want an aggressive, cutthroat control freak, and that's what they're going to get, too.

    2. Re:I disagree? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft, as a company, only cares about money, and running the world is a means to an end.
      Bill Gates, as a person, only cares about running the world, and money is a means to an end.
      And when you look at how much $$$$$$ passes MS's hands the $$ that goes to charity isnt that much.

    3. Re:I disagree? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. MS is out there to make money
      2. Bill giving away so much to charities

      These two assertions are not contradictory.

      MS makes money. They are controlled by their shareholders, of which Bill is a minority holder. MS's primary, overriding goal is to make money and ultimately return profits or equity value to their shareholders.

      Bill is a private individual who may have additional, personal goals, such as giving money to charities he believes in. Once the basic food, clothing, house, and car necessities are looked after, mind you... ;-)

    4. Re:I disagree? by BurritoWarrior · · Score: 2

      Investors and analysts want an aggressive, cutthroat control freak, and that's what they're going to get, too.

      What they don't want is a company engaged in ILLEGAL business practices -- which is what Microsoft has been convicted of. This is FOOLISH behavior on the part of MS.

      Unless you meant cuthroat as in "cutting ones own throat..."

    5. Re:I disagree? by bryanbrunton · · Score: 2


      "Investors and analysts want an aggressive, cutthroat control freak, and that's what they're going to get, too."

      What do you bet that a majority of Microsoft investors do not want an immature asshole like Gates running the company? If they knew the true Gates and the true harm, injury and cost of acquiring a meaningless 90% browser market share.

      Perhaps the investors didn't want hundreds of millions wasted on attorneys?

      Perhaps investors didn't want the ego-manical Gates to ruin the reputation of the company as a trust worth business partner?

      And now that the Microsoft stock bubble has begun to bust, the investors will begin to wonder why Microsoft has NEVER paid a divendend when they are sitting on billions in cash reserves?

    6. Re:I disagree? by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

      regarding the statement that "money is power." perhaps more so in the US than anywhere; I don't know.

      regarding power per se: only because people give it (the instrument of power) any distinction or notice whatsoever

      Nietzsche: "How can I help it that power likes to walk on crooked legs?"

      --
      C|N>K
    7. Re:I disagree? by fferreres · · Score: 2

      Isn't he himself the biggest single shareholder of the company? In that sense, it's his company. I couldn't care less if they donate or if he donates. That money comes from the goverment, you employer, you and your mama.

      Now, I'd be nice to notice that it's really your money beign donated and your name is beign replaced with a "Microsoft Good" signature. And not only it really is your money, but it was taken from you by unfair practices (monopoly abuse).

      So please cut the crap with this Micrsoft filantropy which IS NOT.

      --
      unfinished: (adj.)
    8. Re:I disagree? by fferreres · · Score: 2

      he can use $100 bills as toilet tissue for all I care

      Interesting. On the other side, I'd prefer he'd use it to actually pay for developing what they sell, harden security, hurry patches dispatchs, suing their legal deparment to secure our rights to free speech.

      But i guess they figured out that if they have all this market share with the actual product as is, then there's no point in making them better. People will just buy at whatever price they ask.

      --
      unfinished: (adj.)
    9. Re:I disagree? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now, I'd be nice to notice that it's really your money beign donated and your name is beign replaced with a "Microsoft Good" signature.

      Wow. Aren't you the vigorous little socialist.

    10. Re:I disagree? by T-Ranger · · Score: 1

      For the record, precentege wise BillG give significantly less to charity then most everyone else. I cant quickly find a reference, but this is /...
      I have immages of an eldery BillG handing out silver dollars to small children in 20 years in an effort to improve his personal legacy.

  99. ...makes you want to go .... by Lewis+Mettler,+Esq. · · Score: 1

    Right across from the weavers? Not bad placement. For CodeWeavers that is.

    --
    NexuSys - Linux support by the best
    1. Re:...makes you want to go .... by morcego · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I can just picture something:

      Newbie: Hey, I just got this CD for Free on the Microsoft booth. Can you help me install it in Linux ?

      --
      morcego
    2. Re:...makes you want to go .... by Lewis+Mettler,+Esq. · · Score: 1

      I can see why you refuse to use your own name.

      --
      NexuSys - Linux support by the best
  100. Why not answer them? by Poingggg · · Score: 1

    Sometime ago /. posted a link to a letter of some Cuban statesman (http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/25157.html ), in answer to a M$ FUD-letter. Why not have this letter printed on poster-format and hang it all over the place, say two posters per booth (except the M$-booth maybe :-) ). I think all M$ FUD will be more then compensated!

    --
    What person will donate an airborne act of love?
  101. Yes, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He just does that on Slashdot.. nobody of any importance reads Slashdot ;) Expos, meanwhile, are open to the public, and sometimes get like media coverage and shit.

  102. Microsoft Motivation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I wouldn't be suprised if Microsoft will have a booth JUST to see what the childish linux types will do. All MS needs is a few good pictures of some linux type hurling feces around the convention to plaster on an ad decrying the linux mentality.

    "Your typical Linux Administrator... are you sure you want this running your company?"

  103. Linux is dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux is just not as good as FreeBSD.

  104. Wouldn't it be nice... by oldstrat · · Score: 2

    Microsoft actually exhibits at the booth,
    and everyone keeps 10ft away from it and refuses to acknowledge it's existance,
    or the existance of M$'s droids when they wander the floor trying to drum up interest.
    The folks with booths near M$ should request to be moved.

  105. Prediction: failed demos by elvey · · Score: 1

    They'll be trying to show that their latest stuff is cool, try to get some respect/mindshare. It'll probably be a big bust, becaue it'll keep malfunctioning, by collapsing under its own weight, with a few straws added by other show attendees (running large trucks through the holes in their software, most likely).

    --
    Make 'em pay! http://Payola.org #include "stddisclaimer
  106. Reasons? by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Funny

    Microsoft Linux® to be unveiled.

    Actually a ploy, they'll show up with buckets of money and try to buy loyalty

    Show all the technology they own and you can't see the source code to - Nyah!!

    We Have The Way Out and we'll show you as soon as we can get the Powerpoint presentation to work

    Rollout, denied-until-two-months-ago-existence, of Modular Windows

    A test to see how low the temperature in Hell can actually go, below freezing

    Demonstration of how Linux servers and Windows workstations can live in peace as soon as their engineers stop changing the specifications every five minutes.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Reasons? by The+FooMiester · · Score: 1

      > Demonstration of how Linux servers and Windows workstations can live in peace as soon as their engineers stop changing the specifications every
      five minutes.

      Probably gonna get marked troll or flamebait for this, but is the way microsoft changes the protocols the same as the way that the linux distros can't agree on command line syntax for utilities?

      --
      The previous has been a secret message to my comrades.
    2. Re:Reasons? by BJH · · Score: 1

      Which utilities would those be?

    3. Re:Reasons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he's under the assumption that all the legacy userland code that's been dragged in and compiled under Linux comes from a uniform development team somewhere.

      Hahahaha.

  107. The Poor MS Exhibitors by SphynxSR · · Score: 1

    I feel really sorry for the exhibitor who is getting this as an assignment. The amount of abuse they going get just being there. However much the company as a whole deserves it. I hope people video tape the abuse it would mae a great reality show.Streaming a live feed of their booth would be great too. SphynxSR

    --

    I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
  108. Linux Business Unit by truthsearch · · Score: 2

    Very insightful. I just want to add the fact that MS Office makes up about 60% of MS revenue. It's their most profitable product, by far.

    1. Re:Linux Business Unit by jafac · · Score: 2

      hm, and all this time, I thought their most profitable product was MSDN subscriptions.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  109. Just what microsoft wants by cybercuzco · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I hear alot of people saying something to the effect of "I hope that the MS booth gets trashed because MS Sucks" This is probably EXACTLY what microsoft wants. Think about it, MS has done all it can to portray Linux as a system designed by crackers and script kiddies, one stop short of terrorists. How do you think the government will react if MS get physically attacked at a trade show? MS Will say: "See, we told you that those Linux geeks are all hackers, you cant trust them to make secure systems, but you can trust us, were the victim here." Which is what will happen im sure.

    --

    1. Re:Just what microsoft wants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I hear alot of people saying something to the effect of "I hope that the MS booth gets trashed because MS Sucks"

      Who said that? I can only find a couple of comments like that, meant as joke.

    2. Re:Just what microsoft wants by Saib0t · · Score: 2
      how do you think the government will react if MS get physically attacked at a trade show? MS Will say: "See, we told you that those Linux geeks are all hackers, you cant trust them to make secure systems, but you can trust us, were the victim here."

      Exactly the same way as they would react if a group of isreali showed up at a "we love palestine" show. They'll laugh at them for being fool enough to show up at a meeting of people they know hate them (for the most part), it's their presence that provoked the others.

      I doubt such a thing will happen though. People will go there, they'll ask why they're there and if they have an interesting product for linux (and get scorned at if they don't), maybe listen to them.
      I'm feeling bad for the PR and techies that will have to be maning the booth though. They'll most certainly get lots of bad comments and/or insults. I don't like Microsoft the corporation, but I have nothing against the people working there (except maybe for the marketroïds and the upper management).

      --

      One shall speak only if what one has to say is more beautiful than silence
  110. Fools! by back@slash · · Score: 3, Funny

    The real reason is so that linux geeks everywhere will lose hours of productive time wondering why MS would have a booth at LinuxWorld.

    --
    This comment was generated by a Squadron of Ultra Ninjas
    1. Re:Fools! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      ... Linux Geeks will lose hours of productive
      time wondering why MS would have a booth at
      LinuxWorld ...

      Nonsense - I'm waiting for a GCC build to
      complete !

      Toon Moene (GNU Fortran Maintainer).

  111. What better way? by icedcool · · Score: 1

    Really, what better way then to make the community look bad then to send in their enemy. When the "childish" start throwing tomatoes, we will only further distance linux from mainstreem and scare off the more "casual" computer users.

    --
    Most people aren't thought about after they're gone. "I wonder where Rob got the plutonium" is better than most get.
  112. No doubt this means that the more childish ..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is anyone else tiring of these "clever" comments appended to every story submission recently? It's as if the editors no longer cared enough to think through the ramifications of reader submitted stories. And if the editors are providing no content of value .....

  113. Why is Microsoft there? My guess. by wazzzup · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I guess if I were Microsoft I would want to be there to "gently reeducate" those IT guys that run MS shops but are considering Linux.

    If I were an IT guy going to the show as a seeker of answers, I would see what Linux has to offer and ask people why I should switch my servers over - get their real life experiences from those that made the switch. If I were an MCSE, possibly investigate how much I'll have to learn to make the switch.

    If I saw the Microsoft booth, I'd then want to ask MS why I shouldn't switch my servers over to Linux and then weigh the pros and cons in the days/weeks/months after the show, probably do a little more investigation. If the booth isn't there, I might not ever ask MS what the cons would be to making the switch.

    The booth might be there to spread FUD/pro-MS information to those on the fence about considering Linux for their servers or recommending Linux to their bosses.

    Plus it doesn't hurt when some kid is mooning your booth while you're talking to one of these on-the-fence guys so you can say "You're gonna trust your company's servers to these kids?"

  114. Microsoft Linux by 5lash · · Score: 1

    I wonder how this would be taken by the Linux Community, if this is whats about to happen. Would they ignore their hatred for all things M$ and use it? I'm sure the compatibility would be useful, but i doubt it'd be as stable RH/Mandrake woteva. I'd be interested to hear your response.

  115. Some Poor SOB by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 2

    at Microsoft must have lost an office contest or pool -- and his "reward" is to man this booth.

    Who said they never had a sense of humor? Kind of like the principal that says: "If you sale 10,000 candy bars for the school fund raiser -- I will shave my head, and move my office to the top roof for a day...."

    --
    (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
  116. Recruiting by sbillard · · Score: 1

    "Hurry Hurry, step right up. Hey you! With the face! Wanna come work for us?" What better way to improve the talent than to pick up some Linix geeks? Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.

  117. We have the way out by PhilipChapman · · Score: 1

    I'm willing to bet that its gonna be their We have the way out project.

    --

    ---
    Always standing, I am a tree awaiting the lightning. -Samael, Crown
  118. MS Office wil stay on windows by richjoyce · · Score: 0

    I would doubt that Microsoft would want to transfer their Office programs to Linux, as it would only encourage their customers to linux and get the word of linux out more (i.e. shopping for MS Office, and see MS Office for Linux, and check out what it is about, realizing they can get a free operating system!) That would probably be a bad business choice...much like Nintendo deciding to make games for Playstation 2...it just wont happen.

  119. Performance tests by TheRain · · Score: 1

    Maybe they'll exhibit some server performance testing side by side on windows and linux.

    --
    Please help! I'm stuck inside my virtual reality headset!
  120. Beware Geeks bearing gifts! by decipher_saint · · Score: 2

    Watch out for free stuff that makes a ticking sound from the MS booth...

    --
    crazy dynamite monkey
  121. Court case not going good. Better De-Monopolize by DaSheeter · · Score: 0

    Not a bad strategy, even if I thought of it myself. Microsoft has a golden opportunity to transform themselves during the "Years of Appeals" by releasing Linux compatible software. Thus de-fanging critics and "dem nasty revenuer" types. All the while embracing, extending, and finally extincting Linux. Should be good for 10 to 20 more years.

  122. Free XP cd's by maxwells_deamon · · Score: 1

    Come on, give out you latest distribution! ;-)

  123. Nobody do anything by Spyder · · Score: 1

    Seriously, if nobody does anything, at all. Don't atlk to them, don't pickup their vendor goodies, don't molest their Hot Booth Babes , it won't give them anything to work with. I understand this is a monumental assursion of self-control for some, but just don't do anything. The conference is about Linux, and MS has repeatedly made Linux interoperablity as difficult as they could manage. They have no software for the platform and no interest in sponsoring any projects. They have nothing to say.

    --
    Spyder
  124. Good point on their hardware. by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There is ONE type of product that M$ does well, and makes an honest living with - Input devices. This is the ONLY area where I've seen them actually innovate. (Mouse wheel, first company with an all-surface optical - The grid-pad opts from Sun don't count).

    As long as they stay far away from software, they're golden.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:Good point on their hardware. by happyclam · · Score: 2
      There is ONE type of product that M$ does well, and makes an honest living with - Input devices.

      Actually, there's another product they do well: trade show booths.

      --
      He looked at me and said, "Kid, we don't like your kind, and we're gonna send your fingerprints off to Washington."
    2. Re:Good point on their hardware. by Frag-A-Muffin · · Score: 3, Funny

      There is ONE type of product that M$ does well, and makes an honest living with - Input devices. This is the ONLY area where I've seen them actually innovate. (Mouse wheel, first company with an all-surface optical - The grid-pad opts from Sun don't count). As long as they stay far away from software, they're golden.

      Perhaps you've never heard of the monstrosity called the xbox?

      --

      AirSpeak - http://itunes.com/apps/AirSpeak
    3. Re:Good point on their hardware. by John+Fulmer · · Score: 2

      The 'scroll mouse' was first marketed by Mouse Systems, although MS's mouse was the first financially sucessful wheel mouse.

      The optical mouse was also Mouse Systems (with the grid-pad), and MS and Logitech both developed plain surface optical at the same time ~1999. MS was first to market, however.

      http://abcnews.go.com/sections/tech/CuttingEdge/ op ticalmouse990526.html

    4. Re:Good point on their hardware. by Jo+Deisenhofer · · Score: 1

      .. and Flight Simulator.
      And the aqueduct.

    5. Re:Good point on their hardware. by MaxVlast · · Score: 3, Funny

      I've heard MS described as a killer mouse company with a software division.

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    6. Re:Good point on their hardware. by Ogerman · · Score: 3, Informative

      There is ONE type of product that M$ does well, and makes an honest living with - Input devices.
      You've apparently never taken one of "their" input devices apart. Do so and learn. Last I checked, they're all made by Mitsumi. Who the heck knows how or by whom they were designed. They're just branded OEM products. I like the keyboard design reasonably well, but Logitech makes much more ergonomic mice IHMO.

  125. MS-BSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Linux community is off base on this one.
    It's not MS-Linux but MS-BSD.
    They already got a native port of Office for OSX
    which is more or less FreeBSD

  126. Wouldn't surprise me if . . . by High+Jumbllama · · Score: 1

    some part/faction of the companmy actually likes Linux. That damn company is so big, it's left hand cannot possibly know what its right hand is doing. The XBox group is probably encouraging Linux. We already know they've taken code.

  127. Distraction by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2

    They say that MS always has the prettiest booth babes - and probably the largest stand to put them on. So they just aim to sabotage the show by distracting everybody.

    The only possible response is to dress up in penguin suits and form a 'ring of herring' around the Microsoft booth.

    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    1. Re:Distraction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does everybody remember the kind of press Raymond got for showing up to a Windows Refund rally dressed as Darth Vader?

      Just remember: there will be suits and management types at this expo who are considering deploying Linux. Don't blow it with sophmoric excess and a sense of youthful adventure.

  128. like you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No doubt this means that the more childish among us will make us all look bad. Sigh.

    You mean like yourself?

  129. They advertise in Linux mags... by mikethegeek · · Score: 2

    I've seen MS ads in most Linux magazines I've bought. Mostly touting their "enterprise" products, and even offering to GIVE away a copy. Remember, the first dose of herin is often free ;)

    They are there for intimidation purposes, pure and simple, the same reason why they advertise in the mags. "We are Microsoft, we are everywhere, you are not to HAVE your own space without us" is the attitude.

    The best thing to do would be for people there to ignore them and move on, just as I do when I encounter one of their ads in a Linux mag. I don't blame the magazine for taking their money.

    My bet would be they will be touting .NET and maybe their "We have the way out" foolishness is what they will be doing on the surface. But the real purpose is intimidation.

    --
    === The price of freedom is eternal vigilance
  130. isn't this obvious?? by zloppy303 · · Score: 1

    Clearly because of the economic downfall, they (microsoft) are looking for a cheap way to have a look at all the great stuff that linux has to offer!
    They're only there to find more things to copy or for more things they can use for their FUD...
    The optimistic among us might think in ways like: if you can't beat them, join them... but I don't think microsoft will ever use that tactic.(they're more the "if you can't beat them, buy them" kind...)

    --
    Beware of Programmers who carry screwdrivers. -- Leonard Brandwein
  131. Re:Microsoft BSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not MS Linux it is MS-OSX.
    They've already got a native port for OSX

  132. Way Out by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    Shouldn't that be, and always have been, "We own the way out?"

    Seems like that alone would make Linux more attractive...

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  133. "No doubt this means that the more childish..." by flacco · · Score: 2
    Yes, remember kids - always treat the megalo-corp that strives to destroy, continually insults, and generally shits all over your favorite operating system with the utmost deference and respect.

    I would laugh until I passed out if a few of the more "childish" among us beat the living hell out of the MS reps, and then chased their tripping, crying, shirtless nose-bleeding-all-over-themselves asses into the streets.

    Just like happened to me and my friend in that puerto rican bar that one time.

    --
    pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    1. Re:"No doubt this means that the more childish..." by zloppy303 · · Score: 1

      Yes, remember kids - always treat the megalo-corp that strives to destroy, continually insults, and generally shits all over your favorite operating system with the utmost deference and respect.
      Like publically humiliating them at the LinuxExpo will help the image of an OS that is generally regarded as something for geeks and l337 h4x0r5...
      Nope... the only way to beat the evil empire is with patience and dignity, show the world that the open source community is truly a better place for everyone!

      --
      Beware of Programmers who carry screwdrivers. -- Leonard Brandwein
  134. two words by TheTomcat · · Score: 4, Funny

    No doubt this means that the more childish among us will make us all look bad. Sigh.

    Tesla Coil.

    S

    1. Re:two words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not so good. Tesla Coil's have an area effect centered around the unit.

      Try a HERF Gun. Much better choice.


      This should go without saying, but don't do it. Linux has the technological edge by a vast margin. Don't give the bastards PR ammo to use against us.

  135. Why are they even allowed to have an exhibit? by LoRider · · Score: 1

    Seriously, do the organizers have to allow Microsoft to even be there?

    I think its funny that Microsoft carries so much muscle that even the Linux community will bend over to please Microsoft.

    "Oh, you want to put an exhibit at the LinuxExpo?", LinuxExpo.

    "Yep", Microsoft sales person.

    "Great, we'll put you right across from the 'I love Richard Stallman' exhibit."

    Give me a break.

    --
    LoRider
    1. Re:Why are they even allowed to have an exhibit? by xiaix · · Score: 1

      Looks like they are right across from Pogo Linux.
      By the way - I have purchased 2 machines from them and have been very happy with the hardware & setup. Them being PogoLinux, of course.

      --

      Have you read the Moderator Guidelines yet?

    2. Re:Why are they even allowed to have an exhibit? by Junta · · Score: 2

      I think it is more that the organizers are more interested in what the companies are paying to be there rather than furthering the cause of linux....

      For example AMD will be there. I doubt they have linux software for sale, but there to say how well Linux runs on AMD. Nothing that furthers the linux 'cause' just a company making money.

      But what if I am wrong and a requirement of the expo is for a company to demonstrate products relevant to linux in order to be admitted (in the interest of keeping the expo from losing focus). Would that mean that microsoft has demonstrated something that runs on linux to push? Or as others have pointed out it might be to push .NET and mention the potential role of Linux in the vision? There is one single application I know MS has written for linux, they had written long long ago a netshow viewer for linux. It was binary only and didn't play much content, but it was meant to show they could be as cross platform as real, the then dominant player in the field. I don't think they would object to porting office to Linux if they thought enough linux users were there to make it worthwhile, I mean, they do it for Mac, and I would bet linux usage has probably at least caught up to mac in the professional workplace, MS most profitable target market.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    3. Re:Why are they even allowed to have an exhibit? by Black+Jack+Hyde · · Score: 1
      Seriously, do the organizers have to allow Microsoft to even be there?

      Probably not. But maybe the conversation went like this:

      M$: "We'd like a booth, please."
      LE: "No worries, that will be $10 million US dollars, in diamonds."
      M$ (hands over briefcase): "No problem. May we have a receipt?"

      Jack

    4. Re:Why are they even allowed to have an exhibit? by Acetylene5 · · Score: 1

      >> Seriously, do the organizers have to allow Microsoft to even be there?

      Umm.... the last time I checked, this was a free country, right? If Microsoft is barred from a Linux Expo, who gets barred next? Who decides who gets to participate in the "revolution" and who gets to sit on the sidelines and watch.

      Not that I actually think Microsoft is up to any good, but it's a matter of principle. If they want to attend, it's the civilized, mature thing to do to let them to attend. You don't have to like them ( I don't) or even listen to them, but they still deserve a chance to be heard.

      --
      ---- "Physics is like sex: It has a practical use, but that's not why we do it." -- Richard Feyneman
    5. Re:Why are they even allowed to have an exhibit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why?

  136. Protesters dressed as Borg? by emil · · Score: 5, Funny

    It is probably best that we get this all talked out now, and treat them as fairly as possible. However:

    • Have a whole bunch of guys show up with arms in plaster casts and signs on their necks with "Compaq," "Gateway," "Dell," "HP," "IBM," etc. Just mill around their booth.
    • How about a coffin with "Digital UNIX on Alpha - Rest In Peace - BRING THE MICROSOFT MURDERERS TO JUSTICE!"
    • I love Slashdot's "Bill the Borg" logo. How about a T-Shirt? Sold from a booth right next to them? Who has the booths right next to them? Will they play along?
    • How about a T-Shirt like this:
      Windows NT Server $1,000 = Linux Free
      Microsoft Office $300 = Openoffice Free
      MS SQL Server $5000 = Sybase Free
      WHAT ARE YOU PEOPLE THINKING?!?!?!
    • Another T-Shirt: Microsoft DRM - We've got all your money, now we want your civil rights.
    • How about Thomas Pensfield Jackson as a keynote speaker?

      There are lots of things that could be done to convince Microsoft that this is a really bad idea.

    1. Re:Protesters dressed as Borg? by Soko · · Score: 2

      There are lots of things that could be done to convince Microsoft that this is a really bad idea.

      Why? Why is it a bad idea for them to see the OSS community working? What would be bad about showing Microsoft that they can play fair and win?

      Nevermind who they are and what they do, just trundle along merrily on your OSS way. Doing that instead of picking a fight, or better still actually welcoming them, will show them how to behave in a community. OK, they've been bad boys and have caused a lot of strife, but I believe in reform more that capital punishment.

      "Proprietary software? No thanks. Heyyyy, like the .Net code snippet there, bud. Interested in sharing? I've got some bitchin' PERL scripts here..."

      Don't forget that Microsoft employs geeks too. If we're nice to them (and just burn their Marketing Dept at the stake instead), maybe then they'll open up the locked and bolted doors of the Cathedral once in a while and let the Bazaar in for a look. Kinda like a garage sale. ;-)

      Soko

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    2. Re:Protesters dressed as Borg? by planet_hoth · · Score: 1

      I love Slashdot's "Bill the Borg" logo. How about a T-Shirt? Sold from a booth right next to them? Who has the booths right next to them? Will they play along?

      If I remember correctly, the Borg icon actually comes from a T-shirt that was being sold back during the early days of Slashdot. Until, of course, Microsoft sued the t-shirt guy out of business...

      --

    3. Re:Protesters dressed as Borg? by Kefaa · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There are lots of things that could be done to convince Microsoft that this is a really bad idea.

      Yes there are, and this would be the ideal time for them to happen. Then the PR machine would roll...
      "Would you trust your business to..."
      "Do you want your government run by..."
      "This is what you can look forward to as a Window's user when you work with Linux..."

      They have millions to spend on spin and are waiting for their "Rodney King" moment.

      We have to be at our absolute best. Showing the business world that we can them in any mixture of Linux/Windows/MAC/UNIX/MVS, that meets their business needs. That the Linux community are the technologists who can improve the business model while reducing costs.

    4. Re:Protesters dressed as Borg? by miffo.swe · · Score: 1
      Really bad idea!

      They are and will be a predatory monopoly. To engage in any cooperation with them at all is to write your own death sentence. Never play with the devil cause hes better at cheating than you. Remember that being a good sport isnt in Microsofts vocabulary.

      --
      HTTP/1.1 400
    5. Re:Protesters dressed as Borg? by SN74S181 · · Score: 2

      Just in case you've never read the history of Raymaond's CATB essay, it was written originally as a polemic directed toward the fairly closed 'Cathederal' way certain applications like GNU Emacs were written. Similar to the tight teams that code NetBSD and FreeBSD.

      To quote from Raymond himself: "I discuss these theories in terms of two fundamentally different development styles, the 'cathedral' model of FSF (Editors note: I assume FSF stands for the 'Free Software Foundation') and its imitators versus the 'bazaar' model of the Linux world. "

      The number of people who now seem to have forgotten the CATB essay was written to address issues within the Free Software Community and not as an attack on Commercial software is staggering. It's almost like Raymond himself wants the original context of the essay to fade away.

    6. Re:Protesters dressed as Borg? by essdodson · · Score: 1


      How about a T-Shirt like this:
      Windows NT Server $1,000 = Linux Free
      Microsoft Office $300 = Openoffice Free
      MS SQL Server $5000 = Sybase Free
      WHAT ARE YOU PEOPLE THINKING?!?!?!


      I'm sincerly sorry that you've been fooled into thinking that all of the "Free" options above are really viable for big time business. If not simply because they're poor performers, but also because they're not truly "Free" as they fall under the incredibly viral GPL.

      Also, its interesting that you mention Sybase as its the only free option you've listed above that's to be taken seriously. The bad part is that the Linux version of Sybase server that's available freely is terribly outdated and does not support many of the very nice features that MS-SQL2000 does. I'm really glad you didn't mention some half assed database server like MySQL; unless they really make some ground breaking improvement quickly, MySQL is not in a position for real applications.

      I've not tried Openoffice so I won't comment on that, other than the fact that Office has a really strong following that's hard to kill off. As for Linux filling the shoes of NT server, no offense, but I haven't stopped laughing about that yet.

      --
      scott
    7. Re:Protesters dressed as Borg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NT? Are you fucking kidding?

    8. Re:Protesters dressed as Borg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, don't abuse or harm them. Or be excessively nice to them. They should be treated like any other exhibitor, and their wares evaluated on their own merits. That would be more interesting, see how they stand up, not to shit and abuse, or artificial friendliness, but on the strength of what they have to offer relative to what others there are offering.

    9. Re:Protesters dressed as Borg? by fredrik70 · · Score: 1

      While I agree with most of your post, the line about Linux not being able to fill NT's shoes seems a bit weird. What would NT be able to do that Linux wouldn't be able to? It's pretty much common knowledge that Linux + Samba slaps NT's fingers when it comes to filesharing in terms of reliability.
      NT is a quite mediocre server IMHO and while win2K is much better, I still take Linux/*BSD box anyday, they just work...

      --
      if (!signature) { throw std::runtime_error("No sig!"); }
    10. Re:Protesters dressed as Borg? by essdodson · · Score: 1

      Active directory, etc. It was assumed that NT meant recent versions of NT, as in 2k and the forth coming .Net server line.

      --
      scott
    11. Re:Protesters dressed as Borg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being able to get support for all of your applications = getting support for a very, very limited set of applications.

      Having a UI that doesn't require years to train your users to use = UI, whats that?

      Thinking up new ideas = stealing MS ideas quite a while after the fact (gee, odd how KDE looks so much like windows)

      If I was a corperation and you tried selling me on OSS with that bullshit in your post I would just laugh at you. My devs may be able to see the source for OSS (they can also see the source for MS applications) but that is about the only strength. OSS costs money if I want any kind of support for it (whether that is to higher my own devs or go through Redhat) and it won't be any where near as good as MS premier support. Moreover I will spend tons of money on training and other costs for my users since clunky interfaces are far from intuitive and not being able to cut and paste from one goddamn application into another really does hurt productivity. Just because OSS is cheaper for some hobbyist doesn't make it cheaper for an actual corporation. Quite the opposite in fact.

    12. Re:Protesters dressed as Borg? by fredrik70 · · Score: 1

      Ah, Active Directory, true...
      Suppose you could use LDAP instead, no? (Directory services are not really my strong point).
      And the etc?? would it be webservices and such? Well, not really part of the OS, but you can always use J2EE

      --
      if (!signature) { throw std::runtime_error("No sig!"); }
  137. Let's be civil by Eric+Damron · · Score: 1

    'No doubt this means that the more childish among us will make us all look bad. Sigh.'

    We should all be careful not to put the Linux community in a bad light. I plan on wearing a Groucho Marxs disguise when I hit 'em with a big slimy spitball. How about you?

    "Time wounds all heals" Groucho Marxs.

    --
    The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
  138. Microsoft's motives... by surfcow · · Score: 2

    "One can only guess at what Microsoft's motives might be."

    Perhaps that want to make a nice salad? They will certainly be inundated with fresh produce.

    =brian

  139. Peaceful resistance by peyote · · Score: 1

    I think a good peaceful, yet effective, thing to organize would be to calmly take whatever they are handing out at their booth (software, etc.) and organize a bonfire later in the conference. Sort of a BOF session---"Really want to burn Microsoft? Come to our bonfile at such-and-such-a-place at 10pm. Don't bring an attitude, but do bring plenty of Microsoft wares!"

  140. No, no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The ending is "Then the people who will give up liberty for safety deserve neither safety nor liberty."

    The quote derives from Mike Godwin, a socialist who worked for the EFF in 1898 and wrote the original version of the Pledge of Allegiance

  141. Let's get one more message like this going... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    * Insert typical ultra-biased "MICROSOFT BAD, LINUX GOOD!" comment here *

  142. Three words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft suicide bombers.

  143. BFD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just another obscure company hoping to get noticed. Nothing to see here, move along.

  144. just like Dr. Strangelove by squarefish · · Score: 1

    "Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is a war room!"

    --
    Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains.
  145. the real reason... by lawngnome · · Score: 1

    the real reason is that microsoft wants to show off the xbox running linux, so they can claim the $200,000 - hey atleast they make money on one of em!

  146. Joe Barr - the Mindcraft letter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    From: Joe Barr [joe@pjprimer.com]
    Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 1999 8:02 AM
    To: sales@mindcraft.com
    Subject: Industry Scum

    Hey, Mindcraft

    I am writing an article about asslicking whores in the industry.

    You know the sort, they bend over for folks like Bill Gates by
    producing totally false "benchmarks" based on liess, mistests,
    biased hardware and software, and scores of other unethical,
    deceiptful, dishonest, duplicitous means.

    Like your reviews of NT vs Novell and Linux. Classic cases of
    professional prostitution.

    Cock sucking the geeks in Redmond.

    The question for you maggots, whores, whatever you prefer to be
    called, is: how much does it cost to buy one of your benchmarks?

    tHANKS,

    Joe Barr The Dweebspeak Primer

    And remember Linux kiddies - Joe to this day 'speaks' on behalf of Linux.

  147. Re:BSD is not dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I been a Linux user since 1995, just so you known where I'm coming from OK.

    It's not MS-Linux it's MS-OSX/BSD.
    Considering that MS already has a port of Office
    for OSX which is more or less FreeBSD.
    And that MS FUD is directed at GPL and
    not BSD OS/Software.

    Why is it so far fetched to think that MS couldn't or wouldn't create there of version of OSX?

    Hoping to kill off Apple OSX and Linux at the same time.

  148. Is this Interesting, Funny or what ?... by tmontes · · Score: 1


    For some reason, as of this post, 50% of the posts are modded as Funny.
    Can this antecipate some behavioural pattern ?!

    *sigh*

  149. No good deed goes unpunished by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They found out who's been leaking all those internal emails from Redmond and this is the guys new assignment. Out of the frying pan and into the fire.

  150. This is just an invitation for mayhem by JonathanF · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Microsoft exhibiting at a Linux expo just begs for someone to pull a prank with their booth. Nothing illegal, but something that could really cause a headache.

    I wonder if someone will pull a "Zaltair." :) That was the name of the non-existent computer that Steve Jobs (believe it or not, I don't think it was actually Woz who did this) made a fake brochure for and planted at the MITS booth, MITS being the makers of the real Altair.

    From what I've read, it was hilarious - the poor MITS people were inundated with questions about a product they didn't even know existed (which wasn't their fault, since it didn't)! The real kicker is that Jobs even managed to arrange the brochure so that the hidden "clue" pointed to a different company, Processor Technologies. The only reason we even know this is because of the confession a few years later.

    I can just imagine it now - someone will plant a professionally-made brochure for "Microsoft Linux" or a proprietary Windows emulator for Linux, and the Microsoft reps will be bombarded... or at least, teased mercilessly.

  151. Re:What??!!(MS-BSD) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MS is out to destroy GPL, not BSD.
    After all MS already has a port for OSX which
    is +/- FreeBSD.

    Why not a MS-BSD?

  152. Works for me by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

    That works fine for me. I use Linux because it doesn't suck, and even most distributions do. I couldn't give a hoot if M$ wants to enter in it or not. All that means is that I'll be able to run IE and Office under Linux, which is fine for me. I'm not a GPL biggot.

  153. MS at LinuxExpo? by pavera · · Score: 1

    Strange, I wonder what MS will be doing there?
    hopefully no one burns their booth down...

  154. How long by CakerX · · Score: 1

    How long before their demo machines get hacked, anyone wanna take up bets???

  155. huh? by kennedy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    how is this new?

    i've been going to linuxworld for a few years now.. and well.. m$ has been there EVERY year.

  156. Must-attend conference! by supabeast! · · Score: 2

    Is the signup page for linuxworld Slashdotted yet?

  157. Re:I disagree? QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And when you look at how much $$$$$$ passes MS's hands the $$ that goes to charity isnt that much.

    Yeah, Bill "only" has the biggest charitable foundation -- in history. The foundation has more money than it can even conceivably spend. When you also factor that the mission of the foundation (worldwide immunization of children) has absolutely no direct benefit to Bill or Microsoft, I think you you are way off base here.

    Criticize Microsoft's business practices, fine, but at least give credit where credit is due.

  158. Avoid your childish ways! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Boycott! Simple as that. Make those Micro$oft feel very much alone at the expo.

  159. Actually, I wouldn be surprised... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if the Xbox was the reason they were there.

  160. Obvious by quigonn · · Score: 2

    Obviously Microsoft will do or related something related to BSD. Microsoft likes BSD, since they can rip off all the code (run the 'strings' utility against MS' ftp.exe :-)). At least they gave something "in exchange" to the community, namely a .NET implementation for FreeBSD.

    --
    A monkey is doing the real work for me.
  161. So what? We let the BSD guys in? by firegate · · Score: 1

    I hate microsoft as much as the next guy, but as long as we're letting the BSD guys take such a huge part in the show, we can't complain when Microsoft comes in.. it stopped being "Linux"world a while ago..

    --
    "Make it idiot proof, and someone will make a better idiot."
    1. Re:So what? We let the BSD guys in? by ellem · · Score: 2

      Yeah but come'on....
      Those HOT FreeBSD Grrls
      In their skin tight Red LaTex cat suits....
      soooo sweaty underneath....
      mmm unbathed demoness....
      so hot.... so very hot....

      (crap I need a moist towlette over here!)

      --
      This .sig is fake but accurate.
  162. What do they have to exibit? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Perhaps they are going in with windows as an 'alternative' OS display, which it would be, taken in context of the show.

    Or have some hidden linux app they have been hiding .. like office.. ( yes i know, when pigs fly.. )

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  163. Caldera field day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    > (God forbid the day of a "Microsoft Linux").

    When MS sold its Xenix to SCO (yes it really was Microsoft Xenix before it was SCO Xenix) it signed an agreement that MS would never issue another Unix operating system. This was to ally fears in SCO that MS wanted to dump Xenix (an edition 7 Unix) to bring out a System III based Unix.

    Now Caldera owns SCO, and thus this piece of paper. Ray Noorda has sucessfully sued MS by buying DR-DOS from Novell and using that as a means of suing. Perhaps the real reason that he bought SCO was this piece of paper so that he can sue MS if they ever brought out a Linux or BSD based OS.

    1. Re:Caldera field day by Arctic+Fox · · Score: 2

      'fraid not.
      Since they would be using according to RMS, GNU/Linux, and clearly, Gnu's Not Unix. They would be fully in the right.
      If you could moderate reality, RMS would get a -1 Life's a Bitch.

  164. Mabey they want us to ack like a child. by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Some of the big Open Source Developers are almost violently opposed to Microsoft. And if MS in on the turf and they do ack like children then the Buisness people who are there to determin if Linux suits there needs sees this behavior they may just leave with the opinion that Linux hasent matured enough for the buisness class. Or better yet for MS a crazy Open Source Developer attacts a MS representivie, then that is one more OS(Open Source) developer put into jail and one less OS programming. So if we act like a kids that are acting like the level of my writting (probably 2nt grade). Then MS looks good.

    And if we are all professional which I think may be closer to the truth then MS will have the opertunity to give their side of the story. Eather way it is win win solution for MS.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Mabey they want us to ack like a child. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One way to appear professional is to learn to spell...

      ack -> act
      Buisness -> business
      determin -> determine
      there -> their
      hasent -> hasn't
      buisness -> business
      attacts -> attacks
      representivie -> representative
      writting -> writing
      2nt -> 2nd
      opertunity -> opportunity
      Eather -> Either

      Second grade? How did you make it out of kindergarten?

  165. Perhaps they will be pushing MSDN? by Jack+Hughes · · Score: 1
    In "Linux Journal" they used to have full page MSDN adverts. They might still do - I no longer subscribe to it.

    They would probably be correct in thinking that a lot of developers will be in attendance....

    ... Or maybe pushing Interix or whatever their Posix/UNIX subsystem is called now. Thinking that a lot of RISC/UNIX types might be there looking to convert to Linux - instead they see the friendly face of Microsoft showing them how they can port UNIX apps to NT...

    ... Or maybe the marketing people didn't really know what Linux Expo was - and just saw the expo organiser's blurb telling them it was a "really big IT exhibition with lots of really important IT people going to it and all the big names like IBM, HP, Dell and Oracle will be there" and thought "well, we ought to go too."

  166. The real Microsoft booth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will be empty, with a blue curtain pulled in front of it....

  167. Building Bill a Bigger House by hackus · · Score: 1

    I hope they get heckled.

    If I had the time I would go. But unfortunately, I have a appointment with a few companies that feel they are spending too much money on .Net/XP upgrades, File and Print servers, extensive staff to track patches and bugs on a yearly basis.

    Did I say they just might need a Linux box here or there to replace those, just maybe baby cakes? :-)

    Hack

    --
    Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
  168. Hm by 2000+Britneys · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Maybe aside from the .NET push MS will do at the expo they will also show new (ported) native versions of their software for the LINUX world. Wouldn't it be great to have a native MS Office running on your box so you don't have to worry that the resume you just whipped up in Star Office (OO) will look good on the execs own computer? I personally don't think MS will try to discredit LINUX at it's own show if anything this will give LINUX even more credibility in the corp. world. IE. if MS is taking note (positive note at that) of this "new" linux movement then it must be good

  169. Mod it down! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I doubt I'll be seeing the MS, booth,
    as it will probably be modded down as flamebait, beneath my threshold.

  170. Reverse xbill by lazarus · · Score: 1

    Think of it! I wonder how long it'll be before their entire booth is running Linux...

    I'll bet their machines will be on a network... Bwahahaha...

    --
    I am not interested in articles about life extension advancements.
  171. The Devil Stole My Sole by Jack+Auf · · Score: 1

    The devil came to my house, so I let him in. He sat at my table, so I gave him a cup of tea. He offered me a wish, so I made one. And then he stole my soul and left.

    I suppose I have only myself to blame, but he seemed like a nice fellow despite what others have said about him. Perhaps I should have kept dear the warnings of the others that have fallen before me.

    --
    "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - BF
  172. ADDITIONAL reasons... by happyclam · · Score: 4, Funny
    1. They really want that Peruvian government contract.
    2. They felt that Linux users around the world were deprived the added vacation time enjoyed by Windows users, so they are appearing to show off their three new Linux-based viruses.
    3. It was part of the "community service" they have to perform as part of their antitrust settlement
    4. They will be collecting names of attendees... their software license audit list is getting short and they need to keep the pipeline full
    5. Their marketing department has automatically signed them up for every "expo" in the country because it has the letters "xp" in it.
    6. Their booth will actually be empty. They just wanted to thumb their collective nose at the Linux community with their $44 billion in cash reserves.
    7. They've ported Clippy to Linux.
    8. It's a new form of hazing for all the fresh-out-of-college marketing employees.
    9. The network on the show floor has always been impervious to viruses; putting a whole bunch of Microsoft Outlook boxes on the network will solve that problem.
    10. It is classic cold war, arms-race tactics. By showing up with the biggest booth and the biggest budget, soon they will dominate and co-opt the entire show, and the little fish won't be able to show up any more. In five years, LinuxWorld Expo will be dead, or at least turned into a sidelight for another Microsoft lovefest. I wish it weren't so.
    --
    He looked at me and said, "Kid, we don't like your kind, and we're gonna send your fingerprints off to Washington."
    1. Re:ADDITIONAL reasons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clippy for linux? Who doesn't love vigor?

  173. s/:Linux is dying/ MS-BSD/g by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is obvious flame bait.
    But I'll try to point out once again what the Open Source (BSD & GPL) in general and Linux communties
    keep overlooking.

    1. MS has ported Office to Mac OSX
    2. OSX is more or less FreeBSD
    3. MS FUD attacks have been against GPL/Linux and
    not against BSD Liciense and BSD based OS.
    4. Apple has already done the marketing for MS.
    5. Why is so far fetched considering 1-4 that
    MS would release there own version of *BSD?

    6. What is the underlying OS for XBOX? Could
    it be *BSD?

    1. Re:s/:Linux is dying/ MS-BSD/g by Chicane-UK · · Score: 2

      About the Xbox.. Microsoft *claim* it is a very very stripped down version of the Windows 2000 kernel - stripped down from somthing like 17MB to 20K - which I find a little unlikely :)

      --
      "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
    2. Re:s/:Linux is dying/ MS-BSD/g by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You couldn't run WFWG on 17 mb of ram?

  174. Re:Resist the Urge! - MS is a marketing company.. by Locutus · · Score: 2

    My feeling is that they probably get some kind of information about how many people showed and other statistically useful information. Just like they insisted on pulling $1 from each copy of SCO UNIX and kept close tabs on how many copies of OS/2 sold.

    The use this information to determine how much of their $40+ billion they need to spend on FUD and if more goes to "F", "U", or "D".

    They don't belong at Linux Expo but they are a marketing company after all.

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  175. Email from my CS Dept by SmoothCriminal · · Score: 1



    Email from my CS Dept, I saw it after I read /., quite a coincidence

    Microsoft software distribution is here!

    Through Microsoft's MSDNAA program, we now have a site license for academic

    use for *all* of Microsoft's systems software. This includes everything except MS Office. You can copy this software (e.g. Windows XP Professional) for free.

    If you are a current student or faculty member you may check out a copy of this software to be copied for your use. The check out period is 2 days. You must have an ID and be a current student (if a student) to do this. We currently have made copies of Windows XP Professional, Visual Studio .Net, and SQL Server for you to check out. You can view the full list of what's available at:
    http://www.msdnaa.net/products/descriptions.asp

    You can expand the categories listed there to see what's available. Note that special requests of unusual items on this list should be directed to Paul Ford in CS support, and will require some time for him to make the copies.

    When you check this out, you will be requested to sign a form explaining the terms of use. Some of the pieces of software require an enabling license number, which you can copy down for some of the products. Some other products (Visio, Win XP) require you to get an activation sticker (limit of 2 per person). You will also be asked to write down how many installations you plan on making with the software, which we need to summarize and report to Microsoft periodically.

    See Jennifer in the main CS office (SEO 1120) to check out the CD's. There may be a rush at the beginning of this program, so please be patient if the copies you want are already checked out.

    Enjoy!

  176. This is small fry by slayer99 · · Score: 1
    They had the guts to turn up to the Information Security show at Olympia, London.

    Why should a mere Linux show scare them?

    --
    Martin Brooks / Slayer99 #linux / UIN 2178117
  177. Taking the ballsy high-road by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    whatever their motives, they have a lot of nerve to show up in the first place.

    Having nerve is a Very Good Thing. So at least someone here is paying them the complement they deserve. Will MS be there nay-saying? Unlikely. Will they be there knowing they're going to be the target of a LOT of abuse? Yes. Are they going to pick fights or throw things? Unlikely. They'll run a class act in hostile territory, and improve their image immensely. The media will love their confidence and their nerve.

  178. Microsoft is the Borg; court said so - Monopolists by ClarkEvans · · Score: 2

    Well, Taco you can start making slashdot look less childish by using a decent Microsoft icon, instead of the Bill Gates borg.

    Hunh? No. It's perfect. This is exactly what Microsoft is. They've taken advantage of a very imballenced copyright law to dominate thousands of smaller (and even larger) businesses. The fact that Billy's net worth is greater than 40-45% of the U.S. Population combined is just stunning, no other word for it -- something is horribly, horribly wrong here. Calling a spade a spade is exactly what is needed. Microsoft *is* the Borg if anything could be the borg.

  179. Now this explains it!!! by jzarzosa · · Score: 1

    Now we all know who the anonymous $200,000 donor is for the XBOX Linux port! I shoulda seen it all along! ;)

  180. freezing hell by stew77 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, you guys can be joking around up there. Be glad you're not down here, Satan's bitching all day now about that freezing cold we have now. You know, hell used to be a lovely hot place, but now it's just friggin' cold down here and Satan is swearing all the time. No fun.

    1. Re:freezing hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell him to get his ass to Phoenix, then. Plenty hot around here today.

  181. Exhibiting their technology by Lonath · · Score: 2

    Well, not specifically that. But, my guess is that they'll have a booth with descriptions of all 538 Microsoft pure thought patents that linux users violate every time they turn on their computers.

    They'll have cameras and facial recognition software to use to find out who's at the expo since they can assume that everyone there not working for Microsoft must be using Linux or wants to use Linux.

    That way, they can go after current hardcore users of Linux for infringement of Microsoft's pure thought patents, and make it clear that anyone who even attempts to use Linux will put themselves at grave risk for future lawsuits!!!

    Or, they'll exhibit Palladium.

    But I repeat myself.

  182. anyone care to venture a guess at some ratios? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as in the ratio or stupid 1337 do0dz to the real linux supporting crowd? I am guessing about 80 percent, given the "squeeky wheel gets the oil" factor. Stupid people are generally outspoken in their stupidity. The amount of sheer rhetoric parroted back and forth between zealots and microsoft folk will be entertaining at first and depressing for the rest of the time.

  183. Probably an Acquisition by happyclam · · Score: 2

    Doesn't anyone else think it odd that a company with $40 billion in cash would get a 10'x10' booth in the "startups" section at the Linux show?

    Perhaps the single most plausible explanation for this is that Microsoft recently acquired a company that had already paid for their booth. There are several companies listed on the rookery page of the conference web site that do not appear on the show floor map. These include Globetrotter, Shaolin Microsystems, APPX Software, and Cylant. None of them appears to have anything on their web sites about being acquired, however.

    --
    He looked at me and said, "Kid, we don't like your kind, and we're gonna send your fingerprints off to Washington."
  184. Re:Causing a reaction - in the name of SECURITY by Locutus · · Score: 2

    Maybe 40 people dressed in Tux outfits should circle their booth and stay there for the duration of the Expo. And say it is for security reasons. :)

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  185. Think "Web Services" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A big part of .NET is web services, and Microsoft has already published articles dealing with SOAP and interoperability. With Linux enjoying some reasonable success in the server market, it makes perfect sense for Microsoft to show how .NET web services can play a role in Linux dominated environments.

    Interoperability is a good thing, but remember when you see their demo that interoperability will only last as long as it suits their needs. If they reach critical mass with .NET, they'll deliberately break compatibility to force everyone to become a Microsoft customer.

    Make no mistake, Microsoft is actively strategizing the death of Linux, and they've got a hell of a lot of resources to put to the task. Where's the strategy for Linux, and who will lead the charge?

  186. A better choice: by HiThere · · Score: 2

    Post a simulation of a MS EULA with a question:
    Is this a cancer?

    It probably would need to be a simulation, as I believe that the terms of the EULA prohibit you from disclosing it to anyone else. And copyright law would certainly prohibit you from distributing it. But it should be easy enough to make something that looks convincing at the start and end.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    1. Re:A better choice: by acebone · · Score: 1

      Nope - as long as you didn't agree with the EULA it can't prohibit you in any way.

      So you can use it

      --
      Check out my PHP Url Validator
  187. Their web site runs on MS s/w by Trevelyan · · Score: 1

    Much my suprise netcraft showed that www.linuxworldexpo.com is running on MS machines!
    Now I know that the web server s/w id can be faked (eg walmart) but the OS is shown as MS too!
    also they have had linux+apache listed in the past, so i can only guess that they may have a mix (mirrors) or have switch to MS totaly =/

  188. Microsoft Question by Zancarius · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does this mean they will be showcasing their FreeBSD mail servers that have served them so well with hotmail?

    --
    He who has no .plan has small finger. ~ Confucius on UNIX
  189. *nix based M$ OS by SLASHAttitude · · Score: 1

    I have a theory. Bill Gates is working on the new M$ OS and wants to see what he can steal I mean barrow from the open source community, I mean look at what Apple has done with OS X. I think M$ knows that it has done wrong and look for them to make a *Nix based OS. I mean what other reason would they even show up? They could try to use guerrilla tactics for advertising but I do not think that will go over well with that group.

  190. OK, but then what? by HiThere · · Score: 2

    I can accept that throwing eggs isn't a good idea. This doesn't tell me what is a good idea. Maturity may be great, but it doesn't in itself suggest a path forwards.

    How can this be used to the advantage of the community?
    How can this be used to the detriment of MS?

    These are reasonable questions. I don't have a reasonable answer to either of them. (Outside of the trivially obvious.)

    I suspect that if MS saw any possibility of a large downside that they wouldn't show up.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    1. Re:OK, but then what? by totro · · Score: 1

      How can maturity be used to further Linux and like projects? Not by desperate grabs for mass attention, but rather by calm, relaxed expanations of the issues to the (non-slashdot reading) people in your life. You already have some level of credibility with these people.

      1) If people ask you what interests you, mention (in a non-zealous way) the computer-related projects and freedoms you find cool and why to your semi- and non-technical friends. By using the "soft sell", you won't turn people off. You might even interest them. If you see hints of their interest waning in your explanations, respect this for what it is and end your explanation quickly, changing the subject to something else.

      2) Always keep your friends and family up to date on what MS's current evil scheme to take over the world is. A one paragraph email per major evil plot (.Net, Passport, Palladium, etc.) in layman's terms with an informational URL should do. Do not spam people, this turns them off! Phrase things like you're concerned for their well being, and you thought you might mention it.

      3) if you can afford the time and energy, make your favorite project(s) (like Linux) better and especially easier to use. Personally, I'd like to see Debian "replicator" (http://replicator.sourceforge.net) greatly improved, it opens many possibilities.

      My 2 cents.

    2. Re:OK, but then what? by HiThere · · Score: 2

      Good suggestions. But they don't depend in any way on MS having/not having a booth at LinuxWorld. That was where I was trying to find some appropriate way to advantage the community.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    3. Re:OK, but then what? by sheldon · · Score: 1, Troll

      I can assure you that point #2 will get you quickly added to the "Don't invite this kook to parties" list.

      Especially if you have someone in the family who is knowledgeable on the issue and understands most of the complaints used by the Linux community towards those plots are nothing more than FUD.

  191. Obvious... by The+Creator · · Score: 1

    They smuggle a large BOMB into their booth.

    --

    FRA: STFU GTFO
  192. Tax Deductions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have to remember that Bill gives his cash away often just so the feds don't get it.... like many of us who donate to non-profit organizations. A lot of his "gifts" are tax-write offs. I'm not saying that's not a good thing... b/c he directs his money towards what he would like to improve directly instead of letting the feds decide where it goes for him. I don't know how much of what he gives away is deductable... and what isn't... but... let's not pretend it's all out of kindness & good will... k?

  193. Look who they are almost directly across from... by twoslice · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Codeweavers (Booth 1289)
    Does Microsoft feel that they are their greatest threat or is this just a conspiracy theory???

    --

    From excellent karma to terible karma with a single +5 funny post...
  194. Cringing, whimpering, windows boxen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    For anyone who is going to be attendance with a booth and everything, why not take the initiative to properly "welcome" MS to the show as soon as they hook their boxen up to the show lan? I humbly suggest repeated nessus scans from multiple sources. Maybe some packet fun with nemesis or rain. Free Caffiene Linux t-shirt to the first person or team to own their systems.

  195. Microsoft Has Repsonded by LinuxScribe · · Score: 2, Informative
    Just wanted to inform everyone that I was finally able to get a hold of someone from Microsoft who answered the question of why they were planning to attend.

    The story has been updated with the Microsoft replies as of 2103 UTC.

    Peace,
    LinuxScribe
    a/k/a Brian Proffitt
    Linux Today

  196. Why shouldn't they be welcome? by HiThere · · Score: 2

    Because of their licenses.

    I could go into a lot of details, but that's the core. They treat their customers no better than they treat their business associates. And they treat their business associates no better than they treat their competitors. And they try to kill off the competition.

    Work out the logic, and you will see why no civilized community should consider them for membership.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  197. These people can afford good spin by MadFarmAnimalz · · Score: 1

    I know it's gonna take some real wunder-spin, but I'm expecting that they will coo on about interoperability, co-work, and lots of nice management platitudes.

    In other words, I'm expecting that they're looking on this as a mild publicity stunt. Kudos, though; gutsy move.

    Oh, and as for the people Taco thinks will make us look bad, don't think for one second that the people manning the booth will not be prepared.

    They have the funds to prepare such that they come out smelling like roses.

    Money, in decent quantities, buys perceived reality these days. Remember the last presidential election? :)

    --
    Blearf. Blearf, I say.
  198. picture it... by nocomment · · Score: 0

    Nobody going to the microsoft booth, I think it would cause more of a fuss if _NO ONE_ went to the booth than if a few hecklers stopped by to poke fun at the poor dears...

    --
    /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
    /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
  199. Re:I disagree? QWZX by Buck2 · · Score: 1

    How about Bill Gates keeping every dollar spent on charity and then pulling rank on MS to make the goliath a better behaved machine?

    This would directly impact many more people who are capable of in turn generating more good for humanity than a bunch of children who cannot, due to their social status, receive the treatments that they "need".

    I mean, charities are goddamn shortsighted. Say you immunize a pile of kids, then what? Typically these children have families with little to no income in the standard sense. Now they die of a different cause. Whoopteedoo.

    There are an infinite number of more inventive things Bill Gates could do with the massive amount of capital and rank he controls in Microsoft, and spending a token amount on a charity is a copout.

    I mean c'mon, everyone knows that the born rich guy who buys the big ol' rock for the girl is no cooler than the blue collar who has to scrimp, scrape, and bloody his knuckles to put together a car for her. Mr. Moneybags can mailorder (internet clicky click) the jewel, whereas there's only one way to build the car, IYKWIM, AITYD.

    The point is that I feel that Bill Gates should set his standards higher before he gets props for starting a charity.

    --

    As my father lik@(munch munch)... ....
  200. The Ace - perhaps? by HiThere · · Score: 2

    The ace is called WinXP. Possibly Win2000 also, I'm not sure. I believe that things are such that it is illegal for Wine to successfully emulate the WinXP standards. If they want to emulate Win95, Win98, or WinNT I think that they can try, but I believe that MS has a legal hold over WinXP. I probably believe this because of the recent articles I've come across about the now current MS sdks requireing that the software not be used in conjunction with any GPL software. And because of XP software wanting to register itself much more verbosely than it once did. And because of an EULA that gave MS the right to add, copy, remove, or change any information on you hard disk. But this is clearly not sufficient to justify the belief, so there's probably some other source that I can't call to mind.

    If this is correct, then all that Wine can do is collect the folk who weren't upgrading their MS software anyway, and this probably wouldn't bother MS all that much. It doesn't cost them anything, it keeps their best software in front of people, and it continues to give people an incentive to "upgrade" to the most recent MS software. Which, of course, would need to be on a windows machine.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  201. Unfortunately MS has some unix connect. software by TeddyR · · Score: 2, Interesting


    Unfortiunately, they may actually have a reason for being there to show interoperability.

    MS does have a product that they call "Unix Services for NT" and "Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX (SFU)"

    http://www.microsoft.com/windows/sfu/productinfo /d efault.asp

    Then there is the FUD from
    http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/migrate /unix/

    --

    --
    Time is on my side
  202. MacWorld 1995 by heretical_thoughts · · Score: 1
    I was fortunate to attend MacWorld Boston, in August of 1995. The conference coincided with the release of Windows 95.

    Microsoft was there with one big-ass booth, completely devoid of spectators. It was the best short-cut to get to the "Windows 95 = Apple 84" t-shirts ;-)

    They generally took it in good spirits.

  203. I'm not fond of your wordview, either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry bucko, but the world does not universally accept the notion of destroying a vibrant industry in order to establish a re-hash of a failed socialistic vision of the world. Those of us in the real world have tried communism, and it has been and will always be a collosal failure.

    Any software liscense that has as its stated purpose the destruction of the software and IT industry and the devaluation of IT professionals (to the point where they should take day jobs and program as a hobby) sucks, and if you support such a liscense, then you suck!

  204. The black m$ helo's by s3mp3rf1 · · Score: 1

    It is all one big conspiracy!

  205. Crazy by Chexsum · · Score: 1

    /msg BillGates Begging wont work.

    --
    Pixels keep you awake!
    1. Re:Crazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It worked for Mandrake. Spare change, anyone?

  206. Quick!! by BurritoWarrior · · Score: 2

    Someone send Satan a parka before he gets sick!

  207. Don't portray our community like they want us to.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We need to make THEM look stupid:

    Point a microwave dish at their computers, talk busily on youyr cellphone to your boss, and pertend you're laughing about the stupidity of MS porducts, and do it loudly. Screw with their power supply, make it look like the'yre totally unorganized and sloppy. Make things crash, make it look like everything is sucking ass, and then have some of your well-dressed friends stand around and chuckle.

  208. Maybe to unveli mslinux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they're about to release MSLINUX.

  209. So Do Something Unexpected by Cutthroat · · Score: 1

    If that's exactly what they want, what could disappoint them more than providing a "security detail" of responsible geeks to ensure that the less mature members of our community don't end up representing us all?

    --

    -Cutt

  210. The childish ones may be right by porkface · · Score: 1

    Why worry about what the more childish in the crowd may do? It's fair to say that Microsoft would do better to show more earnest intents in the real world first, rather than simply showing up at a fanboy [not a flame] trade show and thinking all will go well. If they lived their lives in competetive harmony with the Linux world, they would be accepted at such an event without incident. As it stands, I want to see them run out of the joint. I don't feel being a better person about it will help them change, but I do think the bad press they could get would benefit us all.

  211. Re:Microsoft is the Borg; court said so - Monopoli by furballphat · · Score: 1

    The fact that Billy's net worth is greater than 40-45% of the U.S. Population combined is just stunning, no other word for it

    I think you meant average. Seeing as Bill Gates is part of the US population his worth can't exceed it

  212. As long as they have nice "Booth Babes" I am OK . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    See You all There.

    Drive On!

  213. April fools! by secondsun · · Score: 1

    Oh boy you guys relly got us, first the Dr.Who joke and now this. wow this has got to be one of the best...

    Wait, my calender says July 3rd... NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!

    Sounds like a good time to bet on the falcons winning the superbowl.

    --
    There is nothing wrong with being gay. It's getting caught where the trouble lies.
  214. Belgians With Pies by marienf · · Score: 1

    They'd better watch out for Belgians with Pies.
    No seriously, I think the most powerful statement we can make is to completely ignore the M$ booth.
    Have the curious journalists make snapshots of the empty M$ booth.
    The M$ era is over, and it's about time we showed the world... Which we will not do by making a big deal out of this..
    It is *irrelevant*. Please act accordingly.

  215. #1 Reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Microsoft will not man the booth. In fact, they will not even bother with banners. They will come in early in the morning, dump a huge pile of quite-ripe fish guts in their booth spot, and leave.

    There won't be hardly anyone left at that expo by noon.

  216. Bizarre by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
    If you run a trade show, do you have to allow criminals to get booths if they want them?

    It's like some kind of twisted variation on the antitrust trial. "But of course we have to let them in, and give them space if they pay for it. How else do you expect them to threaten our customers?"

    I'm pretty disappointed that this was allowed. Can we have a bit of perspective here? Is this show not private property?

  217. Re:BSD is not dead by GutBomb · · Score: 2

    but MS did not port office over to the bsd layer. apple has thier own api's and toolkits that run on top of the BSD layer. you should know this, it's basic knowledge. you can't simply take something written specifically for OSX and compile it on freebsd. you must also port those toolkits, api's etc...

  218. MS to exhibit by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

    shouldn't there be a corresponding .fud communications protocol to enhance the .net framework? hmmmm... I need to check up on the latest RFC's. (http://www.ietf.org)

    --
    C|N>K
  219. They're going to be evangelizing Palladium by surfimp · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's something from an article titled "Microsoft Seeks Industry-Wide Collaboration for "Palladium" Initiative" I found on Microsoft's website:

    PressPass spoke to John Manferdelli, general manager of the Windows business unit that is building Palladium. He says that while Microsoft's global outreach to the rest of the computer industry has only just begun, the response so far has been very positive. "The development of Palladium is still in its infancy," he says. "While we realize there are many more constituencies that need to be brought into the process, we have every reason to believe this is a technological breakthrough that the industry can really get behind."

    I think they're coming to LinuxWorld in an attempt to get Linux/OSS developers on-board with Palladium. That's the big story, of which .NET is only a part.

  220. I can see it now..... by IchBinEinPenguin · · Score: 1

    a bunch of yahoos dressed as penguins, mooning the M$ stand while hollering

    show us your source!!

  221. Re:Unfortunately MS has some unix connect. softwar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unfortunately? Didn't you see that bit about the more immature of us? Thanks for stepping up to the plate. People like you really really make me hate being in the linux camp. 9/10 of you make me look like a total idiot with your constant, insane, knee-jerk stupidity.

  222. Re:Why is Microsoft there? My guess. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Geez, The linux expo is 90% Linux FUD. The MS FUD would only serve to actually clear the air a bit!

  223. Re:I disagree? QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This would directly impact many more people who are capable of in turn generating more good for humanity than a bunch of children who cannot, due to their social status, receive the treatments that they "need".

    Yeah, you've convinced me, man! Screw all the people in those other countries. If they can't pay for their kid's medicine, then they are better off dead. Hell yeah!

    I mean, it should be obvious to anyone with half a brain that Microsoft being mean to their competitors or not having an "approved" license is infinitely more important than children dying by the millions from preventable diseases. The less of "them", the better. After all, they're just gonna keep breeding, and we don't need that, do we?

    You've made it all so clear to me! Boy, I used to think people like you had their priorities out of whack to care so much about what Microsoft does, but you've straightened me out.

    Testify, brother!

  224. People, Keep your fingers away from MS ANYTHING!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Indian (Navajo): You want to hear the story too don't you old man...O.K.
    She came upon a poisonous snake frozen in the snow. She took the snake home with her. She put the frozen snake on her favorite blanket by the warm fire. She fed it and nursed it back to health.
    One day she picked the snake up and it bit her on the cheek. As she lay dying she asked the snake, I loved you, why have you done this to me? The snake answered, "Look bitch, you knew I was a snake."
    --NBK

  225. Tell me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which one of these buttons calls your parents to pick you up?

    - Triumph the Insult Comic Dog

  226. Best Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The best response, to tell the truth, would be for everyone to simply ignore their booth ;) Dont give them any eyeballs, DEFINITELY dont argue with them, dont even talk to them.

    My guess is that they are there to see what and who they have to buy off or sue out of business in order to stop or slow linux...

  227. Re:hmmmm... by jiminy · · Score: 1

    microsoft linux

    isn't that along the same lines as
    "military intelligence"???????

    --
    Base 2 yields only ARTIFICIAL Intelligence
  228. Maybe they're setting up a refund booth! by sprior · · Score: 1

    Maybe they're setting up a booth where you can return those unopened copies of Windows that you paid for with the computer you bought just to run Linux! This is great! People should bring their unopened copies of Windows with them to the show to have ready. Or maybe not.

  229. Re:People, Keep your fingers away from MS ANYTHING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course in real life people drool over $200.000 to pick the green snake up. They still die in the end (it's *still* a snake after all), but their funeral will be grand and splendid (with flowers from WA), as opposed to the funeral of the projects they neglected in favor of the treacherous snake.

  230. Jeez...I Think I'll Wait in the Car by reallocate · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Most of these posts are rubbish. Judging by them, Linux is supported by puerile adolescents who believe that making money is evil. Repeat after me: It is only software. It is not religion.

    Microsoft has every right to exhibit at that expo. As to what they'll do there, they'll obviously try to convince some of the attendees that they have useful products and services for sale. Since Linux seems more a threat to proprietary Unix vendors than to Microsoft, I'd guess they'll hype Unix-Windows interoperability gizmos.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    1. Re:Jeez...I Think I'll Wait in the Car by Vulture_ · · Score: 1
      Most of these posts are rubbish. Judging by them, Linux is supported by puerile adolescents who believe that making money is evil. Repeat after me: It is only software. It is not religion.
      Of course software is religion. Just ask RMS. :)
      --

      The only way the typical /.er can pick up a chick is with a forklift. -- AC

  231. Maybe... just maybe... by MrIcee · · Score: 2, Funny
    their heart is actually in the right place for a change and they plan on giving out free CD's with WINDOWS source code on it.

  232. feed the troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    yes, I will continue to feed this troll, until his cage is fixed and he cannot harm us anymore.

    FIX IT, TACO!

  233. Sure you do by applejacks · · Score: 1

    I would venture the thought that they are there to data mine for ideas and show off XP spinoffs. Maybe some new type of operating system that is in development. Do not BSD people tend to have booths there? So whats so wrong with them doing the same? IBM will probably be there. Everybody used to hate IBM. Now everybody loves them. They are in with the cheese of the Linux camp now.

  234. Re:Unfortunately MS has some unix connect. softwar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    whats immature about voicing an opinion? the previous poster shows you that although he/she does not like the fact that they have Unix connectivity software, he/she does link to the pages that contain the info so that you can decide with your own reasoning.

  235. MS mouse, Logitech mouse, All are made in Taiwan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My USB optical mouse causes my X-server to crash. Silly MS, can't even resell mice properly

  236. Sweeeeet by ultimabob · · Score: 1

    Sweeeeeet, Maybe now we can see some Microshit on Linux boxes.

    --
    Once upon a time, I once I had a great Sig.....then I lost it.
  237. I'm not gona moon them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm gona throw a bucket of human shit at their booth.

  238. It's a trick... by Spruce+Moose · · Score: 1

    ...get an axe!

  239. Java Expo 98 by Devoras · · Score: 1

    Me and my Uni mates went to the Java Conference 98 at Olympia in London,

    Microsoft had a nice large stand there...

    But the funny thing was was that the M$ employees didn't look like they were having a good time (i.e. THEM vs. us), on the Sun stand they had mock adverts on a huge monitor that always made a dig at M$ in some way.

    We also stole enough of their free CD's (to use as coasters of course) that nearly got us chucked out of the conference.

    I wonder what kind of reception they'll get at the LinuxWorld expo... hmm, NOTE to all /. attendees, try and make them feel as 'welcome' as possible ;-) he he he (a Catbert laugh)

  240. Re:I disagree? QWZX by Buck2 · · Score: 1

    I mean, it should be obvious to anyone with half a brain that Microsoft being mean to their competitors or not having an "approved" license is infinitely more important than children dying by the millions from preventable diseases.

    If it was obvious I would leave it for someone else to point out.

    The idea is not that helping children is bad, it's that the money/rank/influence could be spent for alternate, and more justifiable, causes. The "helping children" part is a plea to the masses along the lines of, "I'm cool. Really. I LIKE kids even though I don't have any."

    Who the FUCK is going to say something bad about that, ASSHOLE?

    The less of "them", the better. After all, they're just gonna keep breeding, and we don't need that, do we?

    I'm talking probabilistically here, man. As a simple probe:

    Count all of the children that receive benefits from Bill Gates' charity.

    Count all of the children of employees in firms that were negatively influenced by Microsoft's practices:
    and only those who Bill Gates would have to agree "were hurt and for no real reason other than to help us".

    Just for THE FUCK OF IT multiply the expected probable "dollars_earned_for_CHARITY/child" times each.

    I guarantee you that the number will be higher in the second category.

    Think about the real fucking world. We're all in it. Some of us just want things to be better. Handing out capital to people who don't know what to do with it doesn't work.

    Philly has tried this, the Church in all of its institutions has tried this. It doesn't work.

    Bill Gates and his wife are seizing on the public soft spot for charity to assuage their guilt for the fucking house they own. GAFC!

    They're not the only ones. They're just a popular target here.

    --

    As my father lik@(munch munch)... ....
  241. Not Much of a Conference !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would a Linux Conference with any respect allow a fucking Microsoft exibit into the building after MS has shit on the community.

    I hope somone calls in a bomb scare every fucking day !!

  242. let's not forget microsoft invented linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    If one considers the primary innovative thing about Linux being the ability to run a Unix variant on modest X86 hardware, then this was done by Microsoft 10 years earlier with Xenix.

    It's only logical that they should want to return to the operating system they created (the commodity Unix), on the machine they made popular (the PC Compatible).

  243. More info by awptic · · Score: 2

    Microsoft's presence at the linuxworld show will be about their offerings for embedded devices, and how they compare to Linux; a statement made my a Microsoft rep. can be found at linuxdevices.com.

  244. Anybody check out the floorplans? by HunterA3 · · Score: 1

    A small bit of interest, at least for me it seems. Looks like MS will be virtually right across the hall from Codeweavers. Perhaps MS has other things in mind also?

  245. Re:Causing a reaction - in the name of SECURITY by 3seas · · Score: 1

    Yeah, now that's the spirit.

    I was also thinking maybe the signs to stick on the booth attendees backs should rather read "Please don't kick me!" :)

  246. How to tell Windows from Linux. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Windows computer is the one without the virtual desktops. Everything running is piled up on one desktop.

  247. Xenix - it's back!! by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Remember Xenix ? It was a Unix-like OS that ran on 8086s and maybe 286s. No reason to abuse Linus's trademark when they've got one of their own...

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Xenix - it's back!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually tested it on a 386 a while back to see if it was y2k compliant
      damn it brought back memories of using the 5 1/4 floppies

      that was when floppy meant floppy :0)

  248. Mouse Systems? by BobTheBooser · · Score: 1

    Acording to the box that my mouse came in, Genius has the patent on the Scroll mouse. But I dont have the box anymore so it is possible that they are one and the same.

  249. Geeks should not speak about business by hayden · · Score: 2

    Microsoft would be absolutely crazy to do an Office port to linux. MS Office is the only app that is keeping the vast majority of desktop computers running Windows (MCSE are tools, not apps). Once linux has it there really isn't that much reason to run windows on the desktop anymore. Linux is much easier to administer and lock down. With Office on linux, it seriously reduces the retraining costs and at the same time seriously reduces the OS purchasing costs. Without Windows on the desktop, Windows in the back room also falls apart (I could frig with Windows networking for a couple of days or I could use NIS and NFS).

    --
    Nerd: Derogatory term typically directed at anybody with a lower Slashdot ID than you.
  250. Re:I disagree? QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Think about the real fucking world. We're all in it. Some of us just want things to be better. Handing out capital to people who don't know what to do with it doesn't work.

    Exactly what makes you think they're just "handing out capital"?

    And by the way, cynicism is inversely proportional to wisdom, and is not a substitute for intelligence despite what people like you seem to think. Gates is not some comic book villain, despite what you want to believe. Did it ever occur to you that he picked this cause because he thought it was a good one, and not just for the PR aspect? Maybe you might want to do some reading on exactly how he came to pick this cause (which is not his only one, by the way).

  251. Re:I disagree? QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Count all of the children of employees in firms that were negatively influenced by Microsoft's practices: and only those who Bill Gates would have to agree "were hurt and for no real reason other than to help us".

    You know what, I have to respond to this stupidity, too.

    First of all, employees of companies that Microsoft "squashed" simply found other jobs. It's absurd to argue that children are dying because Microsoft put a company out of business.

    Second of all, with very few exceptions, most companies that Microsoft has "stomped" deserved to die. Let's take Netscape, who put out one of the worse pieces of crap ever made. Or how about WordPerfect? Ditto. Later versions of WordPerfect became buggy pieces of crap (which is why I originally switched to Word).

    On the other hand, look at Quicken. They survived Microsoft's onslaught nicely, thank you very much.

    You have a highly inflated opinion of Microsoft's importance in the world. Here's a hint: They're importance is almost nil.

  252. Bet its either their Server software or to spy by SWTP · · Score: 1

    I read it somewhere that M$ is loosing the server war. Linux is beating them. So why not go and show off their products? Kind of a head for head display. Pure marketing geek thinking.

    But the odds are its a way to spy and grab information. Remember this is the real Borg we are talking about! Not those wimps on StarTrek! A lot of usfull key info can be found out at a show. Esp when you pump a marketing geek with praise.

  253. good to be childish? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    childish == honest, selfish and unpretentious?

  254. They better dressed as penguins or else! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just wonder who within Micro$soft has the balls to stand inside that booth. If they are smart, they'll send a few fucking good looking babes as reps. Otherwise, poor of the bastards! They better dressed as penguins or else!

  255. They'll be showing MS Linux! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MS already have a Linux distro out. Check out www.mslinux.org for details.

    Enjoy :-)

  256. Re:I disagree? QWZX by Buck2 · · Score: 1

    Exactly what makes you think they're just "handing out capital"?

    I have to assume that they are distributing something since they are a charity after all. If it's not exactly capital then what the fuck is it that this charity has achieved such that they can create something to be distributed that is NOT equitable with capital?

    And by the way, cynicism is inversely proportional to wisdom, and is not a substitute for intelligence despite what people like you seem to think.

    Is this just a piece of wisdom that you involuntarily spewed through your hands onto the keyboard? I'm just asking because it does not appear to be relevant. If you were referring to me then you're mistaking my attitude for cynicism. It's not. It's something else entirely.

    Gates is not some comic book villain, despite what you want to believe.

    I have to think that you mean Buck2 specifically when you say this, although it's questionable since the last sentence was so general. In any case, "Yeah, fucking duh!" I don't actually have this picture of Bill Gates flying around on a sled shooting people and cackling. I _do_ think of him who started a snowball with a bad course, though. And I feel that if he wanted to take a bit more responsibility about it then he could so. He could, for example, denounce some of the Microsoft practices publically.

    Did it ever occur to you that he picked this cause because he thought it was a good one, and not just for the PR aspect? Maybe you might want to do some reading on exactly how he came to pick this cause (which is not his only one, by the way).

    Fuck you. I HAVE read about it. For a while there I thought the same as a lot people when they hear about someone giving money away to the little brown people in need, ie "What a great person."

    Have YOU read about how much money he's really giving away? Have you looked into how much he is REALLY involved in this?

    It doesn't have to be PR (talk about cynical), it's just that giving money to, or starting, charities is the EASY way to look good. Regardless of your intent.

    I'm not convinced that Bill Gates, or his wife, thought about what he was doing even three times as much as the thought that you gave about your last post.

    --

    As my father lik@(munch munch)... ....
  257. Re:I disagree? QWZX by Buck2 · · Score: 1

    > Count all of the children of employees in firms that were negatively influenced by Microsoft's practices: and only those who Bill Gates would have to agree "were hurt and for no real reason other than to help us".

    You know what, I have to respond to this stupidity, too.

    Are you just writing to be read or would you like someone to actually think about what you're saying?

    If the latter, you might want to think about how you start your flames.

    First of all, employees of companies that Microsoft "squashed" simply found other jobs. It's absurd to argue that children are dying because Microsoft put a company out of business.

    That's a good point. Did you also know that gravity is a theory that describes why masses "fall" towards each other? Oh, also, grass is usually green, although sometimes brown, people in France still speak French most of the time, and Japanese people speak, [drumroll] JAPANESE!!!

    We're so smart.

    Second of all, with very few exceptions, most companies that Microsoft has "stomped" deserved to die.

    What is your point? Is it that Bill Gates giving ASSloads of money to needy kids in the ghetto of my hometown pays back for all of the companies that didn't deserve to be stomped because they were playing by the rules while his didn't?

    I'm sorry for being so FUCKING dense, but you're a little unclear.

    Let's take Netscape, who put out one of the worse pieces of crap ever made. Or how about WordPerfect? Ditto.

    So, you refute my arguments about Bill Gates having been able to better spend his time helping the world than sending money to another organization with remarks about pieces of software that should have died. Your argument is nontopical and it makes little sense in the long run.

    There are many, many people who would have benefited from BETTER fucking software than Microsoft provided a long time ago. Because of the weasely position[s] they have taken and the monopolistic "screw you" attitude they've adopted, millions upon millions, billions even, it might be, have been lost due to people with good faith getting hammered by Microsoft's inadequacies.

    Do you think that Bill Gates' flinging a few hundred million off to some charity pays everyone back?

    And the whole FUCKING point is WHO you are screwing over. The people that are getting reamed up the ass are the goddamn CONSUMERS. The people on the recipient end of charity are getting money/drugs/attention for absolutely no reason other than they happen to exist on this planet.

    You have a highly inflated opinion of Microsoft's importance in the world. Here's a hint: They're importance is almost nil.

    You're right. I guess I shouldn't even care. I'm surprised that someone even responded to me since: Microsoft's importance ... is almost nil.

    --

    As my father lik@(munch munch)... ....
  258. April Fools? by Kashif+Shaikh · · Score: 1

    Last time I checked, April Fools was 3 months ago.

  259. Re:I disagree? QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sorry for being so FUCKING dense, but you're a little unclear.

    That's OK. I have a feeling you're pretty young. When you get older and more mature, I think you'll get a little better perspective on these issues. Right now, I don't think you have enough experience to understand what we're talking about.

    Give it a few more years.

  260. Denial of "Service" by Ogerman · · Score: 2

    Here's how people need to respond to this:
    1.) Entirely ignore any presentations they put on. Standing around watching just wastes your time and gives them apparent credence, especially with the press.
    2.) Wear subtle anti-MS themed clothing to the Expo. Simple, witty statements that get the truth across.
    3.) Overwelm their representatives with fake interest--in other words quietly D.O.S. their trained FUD-spewing drones--but don't give them any feedback as to how to attack next. Play dumb while gaining recon on their latest propaganda tactics.
    In other words quiet, peaceful subversion. It's self defense people. They're looking to stir up a fuss and gain some ground somewhere.

  261. Can you top that? by jsse · · Score: 2

    I'm not sure if it's off-topic, but I've a gut feeling that Microsoft comes to show you little kids how a big guy plays the game.

    We've an exhibition in Hong Kong with Microsoft's booth surrounded by their rival companies.

    Microsoft didn't bring any technical man, not much sales or marketing guys, no free gifts. However, we all lost the publicity - see it yourself why

    Can you top that?

  262. GOD DAMMIT! by small_dick · · Score: 2

    I already paid for two people and IDG has a "no cancellation" policy. This sucks.

    --


    Treatment, not tyranny. End the drug war and free our American POWs.
    See my user info for links.
  263. Re:I disagree? QWZX by Buck2 · · Score: 1

    Thanks for responding.

    I have a feeling you're pretty young.

    It's all relative. I'm 26.

    When you get older and more mature, I think you'll get a little better perspective on these issues. Right now, I don't think you have enough experience to understand what we're talking about.


    I cannot but hope that you are incredibly wrong about this. I cannot feel more certain about many things other than the claim that, "If Bill Gates really wanted to help people he could do a fuckload more than just giving chump change to some charity."

    Maybe in my thirties I'll realize the virtue of hiding behind "the public good". In the meantime I'll just watch all of the mature people wallow around in excess, occasionally fling bits at the poor, poor needy folks, congratulate themselves about how good they are, and then stick their heads in the sand with respect to any questions about the morality of their corporate activities.

    Perhaps I'm misled by the latest catastrophes in accounting by our business leaders. They were really for all of the employee's good. I guess I'll just have to live on the planet a bit longer before I "really" understand why fucking people up the ass is ok as long as you give a tenth of the proceeds away to starving kids in a different country.

    I'll be sure to give it a few more years.

    --

    As my father lik@(munch munch)... ....
  264. late response... by erroneus · · Score: 2

    ...I know this is a late response and will not likely get much readership but I'll toss my comment in here anyway.

    When I think of Microsoft at a Linux show, I think of Hare Krishnas at the airport. No one wants to see them there and they know it, but they come anyway. They just can't "not" come.

    But you know? In some respects, I'd like to see them there just to see what happens!!

    First and foremost, I like MSIE as a browser. I'm not yet satisfied with Mozilla on my Redhat box... (I'm also getting disillusioned with Redhat since Gnome 2.0 RPMs aren't quite keeping up and Mozilla 1.1a RPMs aren't to be found yet... go ahead, call me a moron... I can take it.) I also like MS Office although admittedly, I haven't explored Open Office much deeper than a surface glance. And the #1 reason I still use a MS operating system is it's Japanese language support and handling. When I can acquire the convenience and compatibility with apps that Windows gets for Japanese language I/O under Linux, I'll finally dump MS altogether.

    (Perhaps it's just me... there is something about Japanese support under Linux I don't yet understand...)

  265. A behaviorial perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1

    The best response all of us can make to an MS presence at a Linux show is to ignore them totally. Let me speak not as a geek, but as a former sociologist and as someone making his daily bread by practicing behavior modification.

    The best way to extinguish a behavior is to NOT give it attention---ignore it (then replace it with something else later on). Ignoring undesired behavior is the most difficult thing you can do. If you can pull it off, though, it works wonders. If we (Linux/GNU/OSS/free software people) indulge ourselves in adolescent get-back/revenge behavior toward the MS folk we look like idiots they try to represent us as to the public at large. If we do this, they can beat their collective MS breast about the childish, unprofessional and irresonsible behavior of the Linux, etc. community. Right or wrong, we would be handing MS plenty of public ammo to discredit us.

    So what's more important to you---the immediate gratification of insulting, harrassing, or otherwise flipping off the MS exhibitors, or the long term---and long lasting---gratification of NOT giving them what they really want. And what they want is for you and me to make asses of ourselves in public by insulting, harrassing, or otherwise flipping off the MS exhibitors. That WILL be played as FUD for an audience who will never see anything but those publc instances of Linux-people being public asses?

    You choose. Only respond to direct mis-statements of fact, and then do so with NO emotional loading, or with any response other than naked fact. No preaching; no prosletyzing. Then shut up. And NEVER ask a question---that just gives them a chance to say whatever they want heard, NOT to answer your question. For the same reasons, NEVER ask them a question. Got it? Good. Remember, they WANT you to act out, so don't. Be perfectly respectful ladies and gentlemen, no matter how much you want to puke.

    Now go have fun anyway. And maybe they'll have some foxy looking babes and boys (not all geeks are guys, y'know). BTW, excuse my possible incoherence. I've been across the street drinking rum all night---Independence Day party, y'know.

    Happy weekend,
    Thumper

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: PGP 6.5.8

    iQA/AwUBPSPWO0TrZEdmM7XjEQIKogCfa6zszxBAO0bwKfAB 0u o+bY3mJ9cAoKic
    eJ8PjBw8oVRu/7kDmUVXYdMt
    =EYS9
    - ----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

  266. Re:I disagree? QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps I'm misled by the latest catastrophes in accounting by our business leaders. They were really for all of the employee's good.

    No, you're "misled" by painting with a broad brush. There are ALWAYS going to be negative aspects on ANY subject you name. So what? When did anyone promise you life was going to be perfect?

    The question is whether the inevitable excesses are self correcting. You'll note that as bad as Enron was, it eventually collapsed under its own weight, and the collapse will bring about reforms. Are we never going to see this happen again? Of course not. But the point is that the system lurches back and forth, and on the average, progress happens.

    You should be happy at these scandals, because that's the proof that the system works. When you should sorry is when things have the appearance of being perfect and unchanging.

    I guess I'll just have to live on the planet a bit longer before I "really" understand why fucking people up the ass is ok as long as you give a tenth of the proceeds away to starving kids in a different country.

    What you really need to understand is that Microsoft is just not that big a deal, and Microsoft has done FAR more good than harm to the industry. Have they done harm? No doubt about it. But you also have to look at the good. They standardized software and hardware. They basically popularized computers by providing commidicizing hardware.

    Don't believe me? Look at what Microsoft could have done. How about if they went the Apple route and made a Microsoft PC? How would you like it if you had to go to Microsoft for software AND hardware? But they didn't.

    I'm not going to argue that Microsoft hasn't gotten too powerful and too arrogant with that power. But it really isn't that big a deal in the scheme of things. Computers are not as good as they should be, but for the most part having a standard operating system has been a huge boon to having shrink wrap software. You probably don't remember the Bad Old Days when every program shipped their own printer drivers and display drivers.

    The thing about it is, if Microsoft didn't exist, we would have someone else acting the role of Microsoft. An operating system is a natural monopoly. There is too much of a benefit to having a standard set of APIs that everyone writes to.

    Anyway, my bottom line point is that very few people have been "fucked up the ass" as you put it. Yes, some companies probably got squashed. But the consumers for the most part are not harmed by Microsoft. Computer can be better, but they are definitely good enough for hundreds of millions of people. And again, the question of what software runs on PCs is just not that huge an issue in the scheme of things. The latter is the perspective that I think would do you a lot of good.

  267. Watch out, it could be a plot... by BamaPookie · · Score: 1

    They're gonna try to get Linus drunk and steal the source code for the Kernel!!!!!! For heaven's sake, don't let them steal the source code for Linux!

  268. Re:I disagree? QWZX by Buck2 · · Score: 1

    You should be happy at these scandals, because that's the proof that the system works. When you should sorry is when things have the appearance of being perfect and unchanging.

    I'm only quoting to give a point of reference. I have to agree with everything above this. I'm glad that the crap is coming out. I'm glad that bad management, misuse of public trust, and shirking responsibility sometimes lead to people having to come to terms.

    And, most importantly, I have to agree with you that these things will always correct themselves. I just think that I have a longer term picture than you might think I or you do.

    What you really need to understand is that Microsoft is just not that big a deal, and Microsoft has done FAR more good than harm to the industry. Have they done harm? No doubt about it. But you also have to look at the good.

    How about I look at it this way ... I'm a person that can stand to gain from charity. I live in another country. I don't need immunization, I need an education (or something other than what Bill's charity is providing). Like a tree falling in the forest Microsoft fucks a bunch of people over in some place I really don't know much about. Specifically because of this I don't receive the charity that I might have received if others had been better off and feeling more generous.

    Doesn't make sense? How about if you're someone working in a competitive company? What if you're here in the marketplace busting your ass and you get screwed by a company that's not playing fair. Then, on top of all that, the head honcho gives a paltry bit of the proceeds away to people you've never heard of and could care less about and walks away like Robin Hood. Do you think that person is going to go and spend time building homes in Mexico? Maybe he or his children might have if things would have worked out differently.

    My whole point is that this is a closed system here. Economically the amount of damage that Microsoft has done far outweighs the tenpence that Bill is giving to needy kids out of guilt.

    Look at what Microsoft could have done.

    See, this is evidence to me that we are talking, in some respects, about different things. I could care less if someone COULD have run over five people if he only ran over three. It makes no difference to the FIRST three. And giving money to OTHER people besides the survivors of the first three, or three-thousand, victims is comparable to a little bit more than a wave and a goodbye.

    Everyone around here (USA) is so caught up in goddamn charities and penance and shit it's disgusting. It's like all you need to do to become a "good person" again is help someone with their hand out.

    The thing about it is, if Microsoft didn't exist, we would have someone else acting the role of Microsoft.

    This is unnecessarily pessimistic. I was accused of being cynical, but I would never say something like this. Would you argue that the Dark Ages would have existed even if the Church hadn't have been in charge? Do you think chinese labor would have been exploited by someone else had it not been for the people who had done it? Of course, everything that has happened in history has happened from someone and it's ridiculous to say it wouldn't have happened if that person/country wasn't there. But it is equally ridiculous to reprieve someone of the blame because of ANOTHER hypothetical bad guy who would have done it, too.

    Anyway, my bottom line point is that very few people have been "fucked up the ass" as you put it.

    My point is that if there was ONE person who was deliberately screwed over by Microsoft, then before any trucks of hypodermics are shipped off to some needy country, that person should be compensated.

    Helping others does not fix the problem. People need to be held responsible. If Bill Gates is so damn smart, and especially innovative, I have no doubts he can come up with something a little more creative, and topical, than starting a charity.

    And again, the question of what software runs on PCs is just not that huge an issue in the scheme of things. The latter is the perspective that I think would do you a lot of good.

    WTF are you talking about?

    Perhaps it would help if I put things in this manner:

    Suppose I rob a bank and steal a dollar out of every one of the customers' money. I put it into little stock baggies and stash it in my hideyhole. After counting it I realize I have a veritable shitload. My wife and I wonder what to do with all this. Let's help poor kids! That's always a good thing to do. Ah, I'm glad I figured out that problem.

    Am I now a person worthy of praise for helping poor kids?

    --

    As my father lik@(munch munch)... ....
  269. Re:Microsoft is the Borg; court said so - Monopoli by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    check your math, retard

    oh yeah, what larger business does microsoft dominate? oh that's right, none. the only business in the world that is bigger than microsoft is GE, and they're hardly dominated by microsoft.

  270. Honestly by macdaddy · · Score: 2

    I'd rather see their booth have no attendees. I imagine the view from above would be this small area around their booth completly barron of attendees. That's what I invision.

  271. Actually if you followed the history of microsoft by cp5i6 · · Score: 1

    MS for the longest time was running a version of Unix which they lovingly called Xenix. MS Dos was acutally written on the OS along with various other programs that followed including Windows 3.11 I believe. Besides what's wrong with having a MS Linux? There's like a billion flavors of linux running I don't see the harm in having a billion and one. Personally I think MS will be pushing their new languages like C# and their .nets -cp "516??? NO!!! 5i6 ... 5*I*6 !!!"

  272. Actually Rotor runs on linux by Otis_INF · · Score: 2


    4. .Net for Linux.

    This is not an imaginary thing: Rotor, the shared source .NET implementation released by MS and Corel to run on Windows and FreeBSD is ported to Linux not long ago. But I doubt they will show that off on their booth :)

    --
    Never underestimate the relief of true separation of Religion and State.
  273. Guy who mooned Bill Gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Found it, I think. You mean this guy?

  274. Re:MS mouse, Logitech mouse, All are made in Taiwa by halfnerd · · Score: 1

    That's weird, because my MS Intellimouse Exploder(tm) is the best mouse I've ever used under XFree86. If I only could use all five buttons.

  275. Reasons For Showing Up by Captain+Large+Face · · Score: 2

    It seems that they will be attempting to show off products with embedded XP technology, and various server products.

  276. That site has been... by mrjb · · Score: 1

    ... there for ages. Hmm they seem to have trouble releasing on schedule ,)

    --
    Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
  277. Disruptive Technoogy by keoghp · · Score: 1

    Hi
    For Microsoft, Linux is a disruptive technology - and its coming up fast.

    How are they to deal with this?

    1. Embrace it (read buy it, own it, pretend they invented it) or,

    2. Disrupt it before it gets any further (how:- develop a windows emulator for it - see replies below)

    Whatever , Microsoft are not daft.

    --
    For problems, seek only the simplest solution, complexity brings with it more problems.
  278. You're right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't say who I am for obvious reasons, but it is a dirty little secret of Microsofts that Windows 2000 and XP are actually based on a customised Linux kernel! I have seen evidence of this with my own eyes, and I was able to telnet to a Windows 2000 server on a non-standard port. Even more shockingly, it turns out that the root password is "ltorvalds"! uname -s still reports "Microsoft Windows NT 5.0", but uname -a contains the string "Linux 2.2.18"!

    I will publish these shocking findings within the coming weeks.

  279. New information! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [Editor's Note: This story has been expanded to include comments from Microsoft on why they plan to attend LWE. -ed.] ...
    After this story was initially posted, a representative from Microsoft did respond to questions regarding Microsoft's presence at the LinuxWorld Expo. Peter Houston, Sr. Dir. of the Windows Server Product Management Group, answered the question that has been on many people's minds since this story was broken: why?

    "The audience that attends this show is very important to us," Houston explained, "we have some great products to show." He went on to add that Microsoft sees their particpation in this show as the first step towards forming an ongoing dialog with members of the Linux and Open Source community. ...

    Check the news page at http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2002-07 -03-015-26-NW-CY-MS

  280. Next to? by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 2

    Nope, in front of.

    And the sign will have the subtitle "And for a low, low fee, you can use it."

  281. Re:I disagree? QWZX by Vulture_ · · Score: 1
    Suppose I rob a bank and steal a dollar out of every one of the customers' money. I put it into little stock baggies and stash it in my hideyhole. After counting it I realize I have a veritable shitload. My wife and I wonder what to do with all this. Let's help poor kids! That's always a good thing to do. Ah, I'm glad I figured out that problem.
    Am I now a person worthy of praise for helping poor kids?
    Yes, you are. I doubt most of the assholes you stole that buck from will ever even notice, let alone care, but a lot of poor kids certainly will.

    That said, it's still wrong to rob a bank (or do something similarly illegal), even if you do intend to use the loot for charity. And Bill Gates stole a lot more than a dollar from all the people he screwed.

    --

    The only way the typical /.er can pick up a chick is with a forklift. -- AC

  282. It Should be Obvious by Pooua · · Score: 1
    Given the comments in the article, it should be obvious what Microsoft is doing at a Linux expo. In fact, this would make a great geek comedy. Every MS comment quoted by "LinuxToday" is heavy with double intender.

    "The audience that attends this show is very important to us" == "and we would like them back in our matrix"

    "we have some great products to show" == "especially the mind-reading prop from 'Batman' and various hypnotic tools"

    "We have learned a lot at these events," == "as wise men say, 'know thy enemy'"

    "These forums are a great way to establish a dialog." == "These forums give us another chance to tell you how wrong you are for leaving."

    "I'm expecting good things to come out of this," == "Microsoft market share should increase at the expense of Linux and we might even discover that fatal flaw in Linux that we've needed to exploit."

    "It's about that first step in a broader dialog [with the Linux community] and showing our customers some of the great things in our embedded products." == "I'm like a prostitute in front of a convent."

    The bottom line is, MS is only going to LWE to subvert the conference, not to become a supporter of the community. It would be appropriate if their booth were shaped like a giant horse.

    --
    Taking stuff apart since 1969 (TM)
  283. Boston Tea party - yeah this is late posting. by 3seas · · Score: 2

    Remember the Boston Tea party?

    Perhaps this Show where MS is going to show up...

    Take all the MS stuff you have and make it unsuable.
    Then dump it in the MS booth with a reference to the Boston Tea party.

  284. For people attending LinuxWorld by lotrfan · · Score: 1

    I would really love to be there but I can't. But if someone will go there I have a suggestion:

    1 - Beat them in their own game: Ask about Palladium, spend some time gaining the trust of the people there as you are "really" interested in .NET and Palladium, ask if you have the source of a .NET program and compile it with VB.NET, will it be able to run? If not, how will .NET programs developed in-house will run on your own computer you bought? If they answer it'll be signed automatically cause some technology always trust .NET ask them if you can do the same with a C program create in Linux would work on the same machine. I can bet they will be somewhat perplex and will have to pause for some time to think and will be very shameful to not answer and will say he will need to ask his manager.

    I would pay a lot just to see it. Obviously, be prepared to answer politely but also do it in front of A LOT of suits so they can become scared of the answers.

    2 - Another linux guy would do FUD: Wherever a person ask any interested question for MS product or technology one of our guys "appears" and ask if MS can give him a CD with the latest service pack or hotfix that fixes the problem with Windows XXX (choose 2000 or XP) that permits a hacker to read all that personal files, including credit card info, lover name and phone, industrial secret, or that failure in Outlook that permits the new virus that signs you automatically in all p0rn sites in the Internet and sends a copy to the papers ... (you got the idea, just do not force too much as I exemplified, it was just educational :) ). FUD on its best form :) Again, it could be categorized as Beat Them In Their Own Game. Would be hilarious to see each and every suit hearing this, hilarious at best.

    Ok people, it was just too long for a post but these are just anecdotal pieces of a fighting strategy Linux people will have to prepare. Believe when I say MS will be prepared to fight. Read some Sun Tzu (know about the enemy and yourself and you will never lose).

    Good luck and please report back the most hilarious pieces :)

  285. Cretins by JimPooley · · Score: 2

    Reading some of the responses to this item, just makes me feel that Linux is doomed to a geeky ghetto of its own making. With friends like some of the people posting here cackling with glee at nasty tricks they've thought of, who needs enemies?
    Makes me ashamed to use Linux. Really they do.
    Grow up, you cretinous poltroons!

    --

    "Information wants to be paid"
  286. LinuxWorld has been getting smaller anyway... by EvilStein · · Score: 2

    ..at least there will be one less empty booth this year. *shrug* Don't tell me that it's getting "more refined" or anything. Fact is, the LinuxWorld Expo has become much smaller. Yet again, it's being filled with sales/marketing drones with the "Have your people talk to my people and we'll see how much money we can make with this Linux thing" types.

    Years ago, it was fun and full of geeks. Nowadays? It's big money and marketing.

    The Moscone center kind of sucks, too. Don't EVER eat at that "Jollibee" burger joint across the street. The organizers oughta move it to the Sacramento Convention Center.. not too far from SF, easy to get to, ample parking, and the fact that thousands of state IT geeks from dozens of government organizations would be coming over on their lunch breaks. Great chance to show off Linux to government agencies. The yearly Government Technology Conference expos are another way. Linux has absolutely NO presence at that expo. Past 5 years.. nothing at all. It wouldn't be that bad for SuSE or someone to rent a booth at an expo like that and show off what Open Source software can (and might already be doing) in a government environment.

  287. Unix Install Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At my school, microsoft made its presence known at unix install day by showing up and giving free copies of windows 2000 pro to anyone who would install it instead of unix

  288. OT: Re:My fear by MonMotha · · Score: 1

    This is getting horribly offtopic, but I'll continue anyway. You're free to load stuff into the kernel that isn't GPLed (nvidia does it all the time), but you can't use stuff that the authors of GPL kernel components have said they don't want non GPL code to be able to use. There are GPLed portions of the kernel that aren't exported GPLONLY because the developer thought it was OK, or better in the interest of compatibilty. Non-GPL kernel modules can still use these things, and are free to load into the kernel.

    You might say the purpose of that warning is to say that if a symbol doesn't resolve later, itmight be that the symbol is exported GPLONLY and the module isn't GPL. You can safely ignore the warning if you don't mind tainting your kernel.

  289. Re:MS mouse, Logitech mouse, All are made in Taiwa by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    As to 5 buttons - When I get home (Actually, when I get my desktop back up...), I'll email you my X config.

    It IS possible to get all 5 buttons to work! \o/

    It requires some oddball button remapping, though.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?