It's a very thorough overview of all the major steps (technical, mental, emotional, you name it) that an office must pass through in order to successfully dump Microsoft. It'll be very helpful to your cause.
For force feedback on consoles to work, the controllers must have two-way communcations with the console. Could this not upgrade the controller from "peripheral" status to "slave" status, and make the connection between console and controller a "computer network" in itself?
It's not like you get nothing for beta-testing, you do get a working copy of whatever you test - for free, as the article writer states.
Not to mention the entire purpose of beta: to subject the program to the rigours through which it'll be put daily in its finalized form. It's the most realistic form of testing, and arguably the most efficient. Not only do you get your working pre-release copy of the program, but you've ensured a much more stable and generally better final version for yourself. I'd say it's worth it.
There do exist beta incentives (discounts on final versions, et cetera), but those are too varied and specific to different project to be able to blatantly generalize.
Okay. So you've replaced your mouse with a direct link to your brain. Let's say you're using Windows XP (because of brain damage from the operation). Does that mean that if you try to learn anything, Microsoft will charge you for upgrading your hardware?
A good movie normally runs between two and three hours, has an intricate and carefully-constructed plot, has dynamic characters with whom the audience can identify with, and is generally meant as a one-time experience, to be discussed (and likely dissected) afterwards. The last time that such qualities were found in popular music was in the days of the two-hour classical symphony. The symphony allowed for the same developed reaction as today's movies: enjoyment is derived from your experience of all the qualities mentioned above.
Today's music pieces generally run from two to four minutes in length, consist of perhaps two verses and one chorus (repeated several times), with a repetitive melody and perhaps-- at most-- an innovative solo. The content of the song is so much more limited than that of a movie that analysis is just not possible without continuous playback.
Of course, today's popular music fans are certainly not out there to analyse their music, right? What, then, is the basis for their enjoyment of a song? Consider this: the best reaction to a song (that the song creator would hope for) would be a simple "Hey, I like this." It's much more of a knee-jerk reaction. The music somehow stimulates some sort of pleasure nerve, and we derive enjoyment from the song. As humans, we want all the pleasure we can get, and would thus want to hear the song again.
This is the reason that the entire music recording industry exists: the consumer's desire for repetition. We (generally) never bought CDs, cassette tapes, records, et cetera, just to listen to them once. It's going to be an uphill battle for single-serving music distributors.
Slashdot Mirror
And now we can't continue our usual soap meta-opera, all because of you bullies! Sob!
Right! We'll systematically try every pay phone downtown. If you can't stick a quarter in it, add it to the list.
It's a very thorough overview of all the major steps (technical, mental, emotional, you name it) that an office must pass through in order to successfully dump Microsoft. It'll be very helpful to your cause.
Ah, redundancy...
Just by following the easy instructions you create Instant Life®.
Sounds like another intriguing theory of evolution to me. I'd recommend researching it if it wasn't already registered as a trademark.
Not to mention the entire purpose of beta: to subject the program to the rigours through which it'll be put daily in its finalized form. It's the most realistic form of testing, and arguably the most efficient. Not only do you get your working pre-release copy of the program, but you've ensured a much more stable and generally better final version for yourself. I'd say it's worth it.
There do exist beta incentives (discounts on final versions, et cetera), but those are too varied and specific to different project to be able to blatantly generalize.
Okay. So you've replaced your mouse with a direct link to your brain. Let's say you're using Windows XP (because of brain damage from the operation). Does that mean that if you try to learn anything, Microsoft will charge you for upgrading your hardware?
Today's music pieces generally run from two to four minutes in length, consist of perhaps two verses and one chorus (repeated several times), with a repetitive melody and perhaps-- at most-- an innovative solo. The content of the song is so much more limited than that of a movie that analysis is just not possible without continuous playback.
Of course, today's popular music fans are certainly not out there to analyse their music, right? What, then, is the basis for their enjoyment of a song? Consider this: the best reaction to a song (that the song creator would hope for) would be a simple "Hey, I like this." It's much more of a knee-jerk reaction. The music somehow stimulates some sort of pleasure nerve, and we derive enjoyment from the song. As humans, we want all the pleasure we can get, and would thus want to hear the song again.
This is the reason that the entire music recording industry exists: the consumer's desire for repetition. We (generally) never bought CDs, cassette tapes, records, et cetera, just to listen to them once. It's going to be an uphill battle for single-serving music distributors.
Play it again, Sam.