Slashdot Mirror


Think And Click

cecil36 writes: "Yahoo! has reported that scientists have discovered neural technology that allowed a monkey to control a mouse cursor using the brain. ... Further reading states that this technology can be used with the paralyzed or those with Lou Gehrig's Disease to allow them to use their computers."

315 comments

  1. Finally! by Toby+Truman · · Score: 3, Funny
    It's about time, because Doritos crumbs and Coke syrup are wrecking my mouse ball!

    Better than an optical mouse, it's...a cognitive mouse?

    1. Re:Finally! by fleps · · Score: 1

      Smart monkey. Don't they have to teach them to think in Russian first?

    2. Re:Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any body else see the Matrix? Wired directly to the brain, causing the machine to react the way you want/think it should, add a VR environment and see what happens....

      I like the idea for helping out people who could use this, but still.... What if you don't need this, but you are the new experimantal pilot, in a simulator, and you crash the plane... your brain thinks your dead, so your body dies....

    3. Re:Finally! by skware · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh great, so now we can have a shocked monkey playing the "Shock the monkey to win $20" game.

  2. Great.... by Mr.+Neutron · · Score: 1, Troll

    Just when we thought the world was safe from Steven Hawkings, he can now give more boring lectures by "zapping" words directly into a terminal using his brain.

    --
    dinner: it's what's for beer
    1. Re:Great.... by davidsmind · · Score: 1, Funny

      I think we should be more worried about the possibility of him kicking our butts at CS.

      --
      I'll Sig you!
    2. Re:Great.... by Delphis · · Score: 1

      Imagine..

      Instead of a room full of people working away furiously using mouse and keyboard - (grinning and laughing inanely when they frag their opponents) we will have a room full of people just sitting there (still grinning and laughing inanely when they frag their opponents).

      Surreal.

      We are Counterstrike of Borg.

      --
      Delphis
  3. It wasn't reported but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They used the monkey's internal wiring to allow it to manipulate a peripheral "arm" that was attached to a "hand" with several digits allowing not only the movement of the mouse but also pressing of buttons as well.

    Hooray for Science!

    1. Re:It wasn't reported but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL!
      Hey, shouldn't this be moderated as 'funny'?

    2. Re:It wasn't reported but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd think...

      - The original poster of this joke

  4. All right... by Archie+Steel · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...does that mean we're now going to have to design computers that are easy enough for a monkey to use?

    The new distribution's name could be: Mandrill Linux 8.2 (also known as Red Butt Linux...)

    Hmmm...I guess those Ximian guys have been on to this for a while...

    --

    Reminder: find a new sig
    1. Re:All right... by Grape+Shasta · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, we don't want to give the monkeys too much power, they might cause some damage, or accidentally write some Shakespeare or something. We just need to give them toy computers. Something cute. Maybe something that looks like a flower or something. Hey, wait a minute...

      --

      "I am a cipher, a cipher, wrapped in an enigma, smothered in secret sauce" -Jimmy James
    2. Re:All right... by cnkeller · · Score: 2
      does that mean we're now going to have to design computers that are easy enough for a monkey to use?

      Exactly. You can pruchase all your books through Amazon's one-thought-click-to-order through your new edition of Microsoft's Simian EZ....

      --

      there are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots

    3. Re:All right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not? We already have ones written for use by amoeba.

    4. Re:All right... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 3, Funny

      Naw, it just means that the archaic input device known as the "mouse" will now be replaced with the much more sophisticated "monkey".

      Though I'm not sure trying to convince a monkey to click somewhere on the screen is really a step up from just moving a mouse yourself. :)

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    5. Re:All right... by Thrikreen · · Score: 1

      I dunno, I have a feeling a monkey would have more skill using the computer compared to SOME humans around here. =)

    6. Re:All right... by eam · · Score: 1

      >...does that mean we're now going to have to
      > design computers that are easy enough for a
      > monkey to use?

      No, it means we've already done that.

      Unfortunately we're still decades away from a computer easy enough for my users to use.

  5. Is the monkey's name Rupert? by rwa2 · · Score: 1

    Reference to the MS April Fool's press release a few years ago.

    1. Re:Is the monkey's name Rupert? by rwa2 · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, here's the link

    2. Re:Is the monkey's name Rupert? by jokrswild · · Score: 1

      No, Rupert is the name of the 10th planet...

  6. And for some reason... by Dimwit · · Score: 5, Funny

    And for some reason, we kept getting all these different screenplays...something called "Hamlet", and another called "Othello"...

    That and complaints about having wires jammed in its brain...

    --
    ...but it's being eaten...by some...Linux or something...
    1. Re:And for some reason... by Toby+Truman · · Score: 1, Funny

      ...and software called "Office" and "Windows"...

    2. Re:And for some reason... by filmnorthflorida · · Score: 0

      ah, but is it the screenplay to kenneth brannagh's hamlet, or mel gibson's hamlet?

      --
      --- php: perl hates people
    3. Re:And for some reason... by volsung · · Score: 1

      Definitely Mel Gibson.

    4. Re:And for some reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pfff. I've already seen a monkey control a mouse. No biggie.

    5. Re:And for some reason... by BluedemonX · · Score: 2

      Would this be the Hamlet where the British are portrayed as effeminate, oppressive baby-eating bastards during the incredible distortion of history masquerading as documentary you're supposed to hate to the last man by the end of the movie?

      Oh, sorry, that would be every OTHER Mel Gibson movie in recent memory apart from that one where he's mincing around in tights and a turquoise bra.

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
  7. Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I'd sure hate to be the monkey.

  8. The truth about these... by The+Living+Fractal · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is that I will no longer be beatable in any FPS game. My mental aim is flawless. You are all dead.

    --
    I do not respond to cowards. Especially anonymous ones.
    1. Re:The truth about these... by Grape+Shasta · · Score: 5, Funny

      This could happen to you: "j00 got 0wN3d by ResearchMonkey38"... how humiliating!

      --

      "I am a cipher, a cipher, wrapped in an enigma, smothered in secret sauce" -Jimmy James
    2. Re:The truth about these... by The+Living+Fractal · · Score: 1

      lol! researchmonkey38 lol!

      --
      I do not respond to cowards. Especially anonymous ones.
    3. Re:The truth about these... by Pastor+Fluff · · Score: 1

      All your monkey are belong to us.

      --
      Bubble, bubble, toil and trouble... can't we just go to Starbuck's for coffee?
    4. Re:The truth about these... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      may be we all could use some thinking before clicking...

    5. Re:The truth about these... by Squiffy · · Score: 1

      Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these.

    6. Re:The truth about these... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That will depend on how easy this thing is to control, if you have to think 'LEFT!' to move the mouse anywhere, it'll be much easier to use your hand on a mouse. If it is as easy as moving your hand, you'll be just as good, but at least you'll get rid of arm RSI (will we then get brain RSI instead?)
      I would like a system where i can just look at the bastard on the screen and think 'shoot' (or, if it is a really ancient system, press a button).

  9. Operating from your subconcious? by mattbelcher · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wouldn't it be embarrassing to find your computer downloading pr0n everytime one of those Herbal Essences commercials comes on the TV?

    --

    Shockwave Flash movies are the greatest thing to happen to non-sequitur humor since Japan.

    1. Re:Operating from your subconcious? by 2Bits · · Score: 2
      No thanks, I think I'll leave that piece of technology for others. I'd really be embarrased, sitting there, extreme programming with my sexy colleague. It's already hard enough to keep my eyes on the screen. So, no thanks.

    2. Re:Operating from your subconcious? by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 2

      Think how many of those "young hot coeds waiting for you" SPAM you'd end up opening. I avoid them now since my concious brain says "wait a minute, clicking will just validate your email address", which is slightly faster than my hand can move my mouse. If the cursor moves at the speed of thought, I'm never going to get through to reading legitimate emails.

      --
      -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
    3. Re:Operating from your subconcious? by dimator · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wouldn't it be embarrassing to find your computer downloading pr0n

      I'll settle for my computer downloading pr0n on my command, while I'm sitting in front of it, so that my mouse arm can occupy itself with... other "jobs"

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
  10. Good training by esw · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Going one step further, her team then trained the monkey to simply think about a movement, without reaching out and touching the screen."

    So how exactly do you train a monkey to think about doing something without doing it? I'm quite surprised that they were able to do that with the current level of communication between primates and humans.

    ~Eric

    1. Re:Good training by Stevis · · Score: 2, Funny
      I'm quite surprised they were able to do that with the current level of communications between humans, period.

      Stevis, frustrated at his local scientific communication

      --
      We've got two lives, one we're given, and the other one we make. --Mary Chapin Carpenter
    2. Re:Good training by Winged+Cat · · Score: 2

      What does it mean, exactly, to "think about" something? They trained the monkey to produce neural patterns that had some perceived correlation with a certain action, without actually invoking that action. The "mouse" was configured to go off of these neural patterns. What the monkey was actually thinking about, only the monkey actually knows.

    3. Re:Good training by Cato+the+Elder · · Score: 2

      "So how exactly do you train a monkey to think about doing something without doing it? I'm quite surprised that they were able to do that with the current level of communication between primates and humans."

      It might work if you put the monkey in a straightjacket or other restraint--since it would be rewarded for touching the screen, you could see if the same neural pattern was invoked, I wouldn't be surprised if it was (along with the neural pattern for frustration). As they said, once they did the surgery and the monkey found it it could avoid moving, it prefered to just 'think' about it. This implies, as an interesting side note, that monkeys also have the capability to mentally plan/rehearse movements, just like humans do.

      Overall, this seems like a really cool experiment. There have been some other work with non-invasive procedures, but those usually involve learning a new system of biofeedback. If they could actually get this to the point where they could train a paralyzed person to imagine touching controls to manipulate them, it would be a huge breakthrough.

    4. Re:Good training by davidhan · · Score: 1

      I'm sure spanking was involved.

    5. Re:Good training by davmct · · Score: 1

      It's called electrical stimulus. In 1984 they just used a cage with rats who crave eyeballs wrapped around your face. I'm sure after a few trials, you'd think about moving, but refrain from doing so...

    6. Re:Good training by Adversive · · Score: 4, Funny
      I know I'm going to hell for this...

      But its easy!

      1. Teach the monkeys how to play the game using their arms.

      2. Cut off their arms.

      --
      Adversive
      My cat's breath smells like cat food.
    7. Re:Good training by __STDC__ · · Score: 1

      > So how exactly do you train a monkey to think about doing something without doing it? I'm quite surprised that they were able to do that with the current level of communication between primates and humans.

      What you do is you get him to watch an action, say a dot moving from the center of the screen out to the edge, and train him to follow it with his hand (a juice reward is the motivator). The key is a long pause right before the dot moves. As time goes on he comes to expect the dot is going to move and it sits around waiting, thinking about how he is going to move his hands when the dot actually started moving. So what he ends up doing is first thinking about moving his hand to follow then actually following. Watching this you can correlate signals from the planning stage with what he actually ends up doing.

      BTW, I work very peripherally on this project (helping move the electrodes in and out of the brain automatically to optimize the signal quality).

    8. Re:Good training by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Don't think you are the one. Know that you are the one." or somethink like that from "The Matrix".

    9. Re:Good training by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the 60s and 70s they trained rats and cats to change their brainwaves. This required no communication, just rewards.

    10. Re:Good training by Squiffy · · Score: 1

      I don't understand what you mean.

  11. the monkeys from "Project X" maybe... by liquidsin · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...scientists have discovered neural technology that allowed a monkey to control a mouse cursor...

    That's right. AOL 7.0 is all new, and easier than ever!

    --
    do not read this line twice.
  12. Is it parkinsons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "He's shaking! Did he develop Parkinson's Disease?!?!"

    No, he's just clicking on pron sites...

    1. Re:Is it parkinsons? by scott1853 · · Score: 2

      More like trying to close all the damn popups... or... uh... so I've been told.

  13. Who's gonna use it? by NullAndVoid · · Score: 2

    this technology can be used with the paralyzed or those with Lou Gehrig's Disease to allow them to use their computers.

    That's nice and all, but better yet, it can be used by lazy bastards like me who don't want to burn the calories it takes to work the mouse.

    --


    -- Sigs are for losers
    1. Re:Who's gonna use it? by Sarcazmo · · Score: 1

      Better yet... No one would ever have to get out of bed anymore.

      Follow me here, it's not a large jump.

      Basically, we have robotic proxies. Our fragile human bodies stay in a safe place at all times, and we just live our life by remotely controlling our robotic proxies to do the things we would have done.

      In fact, who needs a body, we could just be a brain in a perfect life support environment, safe from death, immortal.

      Scary, eh?

    2. Re:Who's gonna use it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those who dont like Repetetive Strain Injury, maybe...

  14. Neat. by jidar · · Score: 1

    Well thats pretty neat, albeit very intrusive. I think it goes without saying that this is a long way off from being used with human patients, but maybe some day.

    One thing that has occured to me, and you're going to think I'm nuts, but I wonder if this would improve my q3 accuracy. No.. but seriously.. it might...

    --
    Sigs are awesome huh?
    1. Re:Neat. by Winged+Cat · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It might improve your response time, if the signal travels faster from brain through reader to cable into computer, than from brain through neural system to hand to mouse to cable to computer.

      The upgrade I'm looking forward to is when they can emulate the individual neurons in chips, then replace the neurons (one by one if necessary) and accelerate any discrete subsystems that have been fully replaced. Output to computer should then go a bit faster, not to mention better possibility of revival if my body gets shut down (and I don't mean just sleep).

    2. Re:Neat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The upgrade I'm looking forward to is when they can emulate the individual neurons in chips, then replace the neurons (one by one if necessary) and accelerate any discrete subsystems that have been fully replaced.
      Yes! I wish everyone could just understand this.
      If I hear one more "computers will never be truly intelligent", I'm going to puke. Yes, they will be. We have proof. More than five billion independant proofs, actually.
      The brain is a computer, people!
      It could work without quantum mechanics.
      It's deterministic.
      One day, you'll die and have your brain restored from backup into a matrix designed to continue to support your mental functions. (With some primitive modelling of physical body interacting with your nervous system.)
      This will happen within YOUR lifetime. (within next 30 years).
      If you give each neuron a hundred sixty-four bit numbers to model its total "state" (logically, not physically), then, today a billion dollars will buy you a computer that can handle and process the equivalent of anyone's brain.
      The problem, of course, is that we don't have anyone's brain scanned, that we don't know all the rules governing the interactino of neurons and weird hormonal things that are very difficult to model accurately, and that we aren't anywhere near having/knowing these either. And we won't be for decades.
      Remember: what can be done and is worth doing will be done.

    3. Re:Neat. by don_carnage · · Score: 2
      Output to computer should then go a bit faster, not to mention better possibility of revival if my body gets shut down (and I don't mean just sleep).

      Sounds like a page out of Neuromancer.

    4. Re:Neat. by Winged+Cat · · Score: 2

      The concept's been around science fiction for a while. I'd like to see it made real.

    5. Re:Neat. by Winged+Cat · · Score: 2

      If you give each neuron a hundred sixty-four bit numbers to model its total "state" (logically, not physically), then, today a billion dollars will buy you a computer that can handle and process the equivalent of anyone's brain.

      I agree with the spirit of your post in general, but...all this for only one billion dollars? I was under the impression it cost quite a bit more, today. Numbers, please? (Number of neurons that can be emulated by a certain CPU * price for that CPU model, plus equivalents for RAM and so forth.)

    6. Re:Neat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thanks for the agreement!
      Here are the numbers I used to get 1 billion:
      (from here).
      Number of neurons (adult): 20 - 50 billion.
      Number of synapses (adult) 100,000 billion. (2,000-5,000 per neuron).
      This is the cool part:
      Maximum firing frequency of neuron 250-2,000 Hz (0.5-4 ms intervals).
      This means that if a gigahertz processor could do one firing in each clock cycle (which it can't, obviously, since each firing affects potentially 5,000 other neurons) then you could have ONE gigahertz processor (a billion operations per second) processing, real time, the needs of 500,000 Neurons. Ignore IO needs.
      Divide 500,000 into the 100,000 billion neurons that we have in the adult human body and you get...2,000,000 Pentiums. If a pentium and supporting architecture costs $100 on the scale you're talking of, then you get... $200,000,000 for one pentium operation per neuron. If figured, FIVE operations is certainly enough to service the AVERAGE needs of a given neuron (see ranges above), especially since MOST neurons aren't connected to the max number of neurons possible. Then you fudge a factor of a thousand here or there based on maximum firing frequency and actual firing frequency (above calculation used maximum of 2,000 rather than 250, and the "maximum" isn't the "average"), and fudge away IO needs, and a billion dollars just about covers all that.... You probably don't even need 64 bit numbers, but 32 bit numbers definitely will overflow....

    7. Re:Neat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oops, I just realized why I needed to do all that fudging. I divided into the number of SYNAPSES (100,000 billion) instead of the number of NEURONS (20-50 billion). Rather than get:
      "2,000,000 Pentiums"
      I get instead
      "1,000 Pentiums", IF they could model a neuron in each clock cycle.
      Since a Neuron has at most 5,000 synapses, we'll give it 5,000 clock cycles, and get 5,000,000 pentiums, at $200 per pentium when you divide massive architecture costs.
      (For instance, if you want a million processors, it's cheaper to build your own factory and churn out a million processors to do just what you want, rather than pay Intel so they can make a PROFIT (sin of sins) on a general-purpose processor...)

    8. Re:Neat. by Winged+Cat · · Score: 1

      Well...each synapse firing is a couple floating point operations (add value of firing to target neuron, after multiplying by this synapse's current weight), plus one more FPO to update the synapse's weight upon firing, plus one floating point comparison (fire if total excitation >= set point) which can be mostly ignored for this calculation since O(synapses) >> O(neurons); call it 20 cycles per synapse. So, a 1 GHz CPU (10^9 cycles per second) could service 5*10^7 synapses per second. Given about 10^14 [1] synapses, this calls for 2*10^6 CPUs...and, with bulk discounts on that scale, you might well be able to score 1 GHz processors for $500 each, leading to a total outlay for CPUs only of $1*10^9.

      As for the memory requirements...10^14 synapses * 10^10 (=~ 2^30) bits per synapse for 10-digit (slightly limited) floating point integers = 10^24 bits. Proper sequencing of the neurons can probably ensure that memory reads and writes for neurons that have been processed/are about to be processed do not significantly slow down the system (i.e., no more than one read/write happening to any given memory block at a time). A quick price check shows certain models of RAM (made for just-less-than-1 GHz Macs) retailing for about $30 for 10^20 bits, so memory costs should not be a factor relative to CPU costs.

      That said, even at this cost scale, you'd probably still want to pay Intel. Their factories actually do cost more than even this, and for practical terms, they can pour some extra effort for free into creating massively parallel systems like this. Besides, you'd want to concentrate on writing the software. This would be a standard large scientific computer; you might be able to get a grant from some university if you could convince them this could model a human brain with any significant degree of accuracy. (To avoid ethical concerns: test it out modelling lower-density brains - start with insects', move up to amphibians, birds, mammals, primates...the ethics should be worked out long before you reach humans, or at least you can claim they should be.)

      [1] Given the American vs. British definitions of "million", "billion", et cetera, it is generally much safer to use scientific notation when any degree of precision is desired for figures at or over 10^6.

  15. Not new by maniac11 · · Score: 1

    This is old tech (circa 1997)...

    --
    Guvegrra?
    1. Re:Not new by maniac11 · · Score: 1

      oops... forgot the link:
      Implant Technology

      --
      Guvegrra?
  16. The Obligatory Lou Gehrig Joke by telstar · · Score: 1

    Lou Gehrig's Disease? How'd he not see that one coming?

  17. And in further news... by Dutchmaan · · Score: 2

    ...the "other" scientists have made a breakthrough where a "monkey" can be controlled by another "monkey" via a remote system.

    Paranoia or just a joke... you decide.

    1. Re:And in further news... by joebp · · Score: 1
      ...the "other" scientists have made a breakthrough where a "monkey" can be controlled by another "monkey" via a remote system.
      VNC^HM -- Virtual Network Monkey
  18. Really? by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 1

    WOW! Surf pr0n totally HANDS-FREE!

    But seriously, if this pans out, imagine the developments for those who have the use of their hand as well as those who don't. Vehicle and machine controls come to mind(operate manually while accessing computerized info via handsfree), as well as one heck of a video-game. The "it could kill you" seems a little far-fetched to me tho, if properly implemented.

    1. Re:Really? by .sig · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, it wouldn't be hands-free, just no hands working the computer....

      Sorry, couldn't resist that one

      --
      -Space for rent
  19. Telepahy by Catskul · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Two people with these things and radio tramsmitters could potentialy communicate "telepathicly". Awesome.

    --

    Im not here now... Im out KILLING pepperoni
    1. Re:Telepahy by zangdesign · · Score: 3, Funny

      Great! I await the day when some anarchist hacker decides to hack into my headspace and post messages about evil corporate conglomerates!

      Excellent! I can't wait until my brain is subpoenaed by law enforcement because I've supposedly hidden warez files in my left temporal lobe:

      "We're gonna have to confiscate your brain."
      "Do I get a replacement brain?"
      "No."
      "Uh, you do know that the human body can't FUNCTION with a BRAIN, don't you?"
      "Not my problem, criminal."
      "I haven't been convicted yet."
      "You will be. You will be."

      This just gets worse and worse. First, Ashkrofft and Busche, and now this? I was gonna be funny and now I'm just scared.

      I'm gonna go hide under a rock for a while.

      --
      To celebrate the occasion of my 1000th post, I will post no more forever on Slashdot. Goodbye.
    2. Re:Telepahy by alecks · · Score: 1

      So instead of the signal going to a radio, it goes to the muscles in the voicebox and mouth... same thing ;)

    3. Re:Telepahy by Destoo · · Score: 1

      Wait 'till a hacker decides to had into your headspace and burns a goatsecx pic on your brain.

      it is scary.

      --
      Nouvelles de jeux et technologies en français. TC
    4. Re:Telepahy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell me...

      How does the person on the receiving end get the "telepathic" message?

      "Well, they view it on their monitor."

      Sounds like e-mail to me.

      For your "telepathy" idea to work, the implants would have to be tranceivers, AND they'd have to be able to convert the messages to thought-patterns which the brain can interpret via direct input, bypassing sensory organs.

      Good luck. Not with today's tech. You'd have a better shot at working to develop the natural telepathy abilities present in the brain. (Oh yes, we have 'em... We just don't know how to use 'em yet.)

    5. Re:Telepahy by berck · · Score: 1

      Sounds like too much sci fi channel for you, bud.

  20. Uh Oh....... by docstrange · · Score: 1

    A new trend in internet marketing:

    Company with slogan
    I Think Therefore I Spam.

    employee base, 500 monkeys.

    shoot the monkey and win bananna bucks!!!

    --
    Remember that you are unique, just like everybody else.
  21. Article is very vague by RobPiano · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The article doesn't have much detail on the actual transmition of the signal. Well other than the fact that I would hesistate to stick anything in my head these days, I wonder how precise an activity like this is. Signal could be effected by other signals in the area. Like how hearing implants can be effected by cellphones.

    Oh well still seems cool.

    Maybe a better application of this would be for 3D apps in the future. 3D Mice suck.

    Word.

    1. Re:Article is very vague by Devil's+Avocado · · Score: 1

      The signal comes from probes implanted in the monkey's brain. It transmits the signal the same way your computer transmits signals to your monitor--through a bunch of wires.

      I've seen the monkeys, BTW. It freaked my ass out.

      -DA

  22. Tasty by Omega+Prime · · Score: 0

    mmmm... monkey brains good with toast

    --
    "We deal in lead" - Roland of Gilead
  23. Good news for a certain industry by drodver · · Score: 1

    If this comes out you'd better be careful about what your thinking when that naughty pop-ad appears.

  24. Allowing a monkey to control a mouse cursor... by copyconstructor · · Score: 5, Funny

    Good to see Katz is taking Dubya up on his volunteerism agenda and making himself available as a research subject.

  25. nothing new by Syre · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:nothing new by nomadic · · Score: 2

      Anyone actually use one of these brainfinger things? I'm really curious as to how well it works...

    2. Re:nothing new by kilroy_hau · · Score: 1

      Not only cursor movements, but generating slashdot pages!

      This page was generated by a Barrel of Circus Monkeys for kilroy_hau (187226).

      Yep, nothing new.

      --


      Kilroy was here!
    3. Re:nothing new by T__ · · Score: 1

      "Their work focuses on a section of the primate brain known as the posterior parietal cortex. Using high-tech brain scans, the researchers determined that small clumps of cells in this region--as few as 16--were active in the formation of the desire to carry out specific body movements."

      "Speaking with Reuters Health, Meeker said her group's work differs from previous research in that it seeks to replicate the brain-motor connection ``at the level of the first inclination to make a movement.''

      Many teams around the world are trying to set up some sort of direct connection between the brain and external devices. Most efforts focus on the motor cortex, or just on exterior brain wave scans.

      This team is focusing on the parietal lobe of the brain, which is where the intended motions are formulated. When we want to move something, the parietal lobe tells the motor cortex what to do, and the motor cortex figures out exactly what our muscles need to do to do it. For example, if you wanted to pick up a cup, the parietal lobe figures out how to hold your hand and move your arm to accomplish this, and then the motor cortex actually tells the muscles how much force to apply to move the arm and hand as commanded.

      So this work is actually trying to intercept commands from the brain at a much earlier stage then anyone has before, much closer to the level of where the thoughts are created. It is very interesting stuff, and it will be quite amazing when the full potential is realized.

      Note, I am not an expert in this field. I just saw a talk given by a memeber of this team at last years Caltech Alumni Seminar day, and this is what he said.

    4. Re:nothing new by lukesl · · Score: 1

      This is really nothing new.

      Well, it is and it isn't. It isn't because the society for neuroscience meeting where this was presented was in November. However, comparing this to the "cyberlink interface" or other EEG methods, which use electrodes stuck on the scalp, is not really valid. Basically, EEG electrodes record synchronous neural activity in the cortex (or synchronous input from the thalamus), and there's a limited amount of useful information (still a lot) that could be recorded through scalp electrodes. Single-cell recording like in the monkey is the way to go, except even in humans a similar device (quadruplegics moving a mouse pointer around a screen or signaling yes/no) was implemented several years ago (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/entrez/query.fcgi? cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10896186&dopt=Abs tract) In monkeys they've even made a robot arm controlled by electrodes stuck in the brain, and they were able to put the robot arm in one city and have the monkey in another city controlling the arm over the internet. I can't remember who did that, but some of that work was also presented at the same conference that this stuff was at. The difference is that I'm pretty sure both the robot arm and the human mouse-moving experiments were done with electrodes in the precentral gyrus, also known as primary motor cortex, which is much closer to controlling actual movement. This part of the brain was mapped out in the 50's by Penfield, the neurosurgeon who found that giving patients small shocks in different parts of this area would cause different parts of the body to move, and that the map between brain anatomy and body part was the same from person to person. According to the article, however, this monkey study used electrodes in posterior parietal cortex, which could represent somewhat higher-order activity (e.g. movement planning, not actual execution). So in a sense it's that much more interesting. However, the interesting thing is that we've been doing single cell recording from different brain regions for decades, but what's really enabled this type of technology is fast computers to analyze the data and translate it into moving the cursor or whatever in real time.

    5. Re:nothing new by myrddhin^2 · · Score: 1

      I worked for this group over the summer on the next generation of electrodes for their experiments. As was pointed out in the other posts, and a bit in the article, this uses electrodes that go down into the brain. I picks up signals from the part of the brain that plans to make the motion. The big reasons for this is that if you pick them up later (say at the part that takes in the planned movement and turns it into signals for the muscles), there are some problems such as: a> that translating portion of the brain likes to reqire itself. This allows it to overcome some injuries. Electrodes are treated as an injury so in the long term it would likely try to wire itself around your recording device. b> more injuries/diseases knock out the translating stage then the planning stage, thus making this useful to more patients. It's a shame I didn't finish the electrode modifications because my next job was going to be trying to resurrect an old robotic arm to try hooking the monkey up to. *sigh*

    6. Re:nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are a number of things to keep in mind when comparing external electrode measurements to those taken by electrodes at the site:

      1. External electrodes are generally about a cm in diameter. They pick up the summed potential contribution of many orders of magnitude more neurons than electrodes at the site, which are usually probes the width of a fine wire. All of the additional signal drowns out the signal being probed. Signal localization is important to function.

      2. Signals measured by the external electrodes travel through brain mass, cortical fluid, the skull and the skin laying over the skull and so are quite damped on arrival. Signals measured by implanted electrodes typically only measure the cortical region under study.

      3. The study here started by using MRIs to localize the region of the brain involved in performing the task. The assumption going in is that the actions are under the voluntary of the subject (Monkey). External electrode measurements typically proceed through biofeedback mechanisms of some kind: the subject does NOT know how they are causing whatever happens on the screen, but through a lot of observation and practice, they eventually 'learn' to repeat the brain state that causes the event. This control mechanism is rather poor and happens on the order of seconds, even minutes, rather than the milliseconds that are needed for fine game-response. It's tough to alter alpha or beta waves quickly. In experiments I've done, I've seem that trainees often learn how to manipulate their EMG rather than EEG to generate the desired effects. It's easy to control muscle -- after all, we're wired for it. To my knowledge, however, there are no brainwave devices available that can use external EEG measurements to perform an action quickly simply by telling the user to 'think of moving to the left'. When you think of how this kind of planning is localized to a small neural nexus, you can see how the signal would be lost in the noise of all the other signals impinging on the external electrode.

      Perhaps there is a way to extract the signal from a small region using external electrodes and well-crafted algorithms, but I haven't seen anything to date that's all that effective. Cyberlink, Mindsongs, IBVA, and the other commercial devices that proport to provide a brain interface are really old-time biofeedback devices with better sensitivity and a lot flashier software. A lot of fundamental research has to be done in order to make use of traditional EEG.

  26. So... by Doc+Bullfrog · · Score: 1

    does that mean every 10 min the mouse will draw out lewd shapes on the screen?

  27. Got Aim? by Akatosh · · Score: 1

    I wonder how well this works in Quake. Would the cursor instantly snap to the location you were thinking of, or would you have to think 'move left some, then move up some', and if it's the later, what kind of sensitivity would it have?

    1. Re:Got Aim? by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and how many frags did the monkey get?

  28. Would you have to watch what you think? by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 1

    What if I were using this technology to control a remote control arm, and thought about making a middle finger at someone I was frustrated with. Or one of the many impulsive thoughts that go through everyone's mind each day. Would this be unavoidable?

    Would a person have to worry about fantasies and whims that pass through our minds being acted out?

    That would make me feel almost more trapped, in a way.

    mark

    --

    If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
  29. Finaly! by bflong · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does this mean that I can finaly have the "Focus Follow's Brain" option in my window manager? I'm tired of telling people in IRC what shell commands I'm trying to run and I don't like my naughty IRC comments being logged in .bash_history.

    --
    Why is it so hot? Where am I going? What am I doing in this handbasket?
    1. Re:Finaly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should:

      1) Learn the difference between xterm and xchat
      2) Learn the proper spelling of "Finally"

  30. Already got...nope! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Yahoo! has reported that scientists have discovered neural technology that allowed a monkey to control a mouse cursor using the brain.
    I had thought that "first posts" were proof that Slashdot had beaten the scientists, until it got to that "...using the brain" part.
  31. We need this. by smack_attack · · Score: 5, Funny

    This will allow me to keep both hands free while I surf for porn.

    1. Re:We need this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How fast can you think clickclickclickclick...

    2. Re:We need this. by prator · · Score: 1

      Strangely, however, your browser will constantly be scrolling up and down, up and down...

      -prator

    3. Re:We need this. by smack_attack · · Score: 2

      That's a feature, not a bug :)

    4. Re:We need this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please, please, please tell me that your other hand is for your beer...

  32. terminator? umm by n3r0.m4dski11z · · Score: 0

    "Even more challenging are ``Terminator''-type applications that would allow the minds of healthy individuals to meld with machines"

    um did you see terminator?
    If thats where this technology leads you can count me out.

    --
    -
  33. Monkey Thoughts by EMH_Mark3 · · Score: 1

    Sigh.. guess I'll have to start wearing my tin-foil hat again.

    More seriously, how did they know that the monkey was thinking about moving stuff ? Maybe 'move cursor left' was actually 'damnit let me out of this crappy chair'.. Also, how erratic were the cursor movements? Could be fun to play UT with that (and reserving your hands to more useful purposes, like eating or punching your oppenents.)

    --
    Burn the land and boil the sea, you can't take the sky from me
  34. The only problem remaining: by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Funny

    Getting the monkey to understand where you want to move the mouse.
    .

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:The only problem remaining: by jcoy42 · · Score: 1

      I say hook them up with those "Get paid to surf" sites. Not only revenue for the science team, but I'd love to see the "paid to surf" sites try to make sense out of that data.

      --
      The Harvard Law states: Under controlled conditions of light, temperature,
      humidity, and nutrition, the organism will do as it damn well pleases.
      -- Larry Wall

      --
      Never trust an atom. They make up everything.
    2. Re:The only problem remaining: by great+throwdini · · Score: 1

      The only problem remaining: Getting the monkey to understand where you want to move the mouse.

      Over a decade later, and we still haven't learned that nothing good will come from this thinking!

    3. Re:The only problem remaining: by davidhan · · Score: 1

      How 'bout explaining the difference between single clicking and double clicking?

    4. Re:The only problem remaining: by BanSiesta · · Score: 1

      I hear Microsoft tech support has been fighting this problem for years...

  35. old news by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2

    I saw this on a special about 'future tech' on PBS one time. the US Air Force was working on it. The current system used electrodes on the forehead.

    Also, there was a biofeedback-based game controller that looked like a Secret Decoder Ring or something, that a guy was playing a skiing game with.

    1. Re:old news by Knobby · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Air Force must not have gotten too far because DARPA is currently requesting proposals for research leading to a Brain-Machine interface.

      The problem with most brain-machine interfaces is the skull and fluid surrounding the brain. Both of these elements serve as spatial and temporal filters degrading the usefullness of electrodes placed outside the skull as control sensors.

    2. Re:old news by Tryfen · · Score: 1

      A few years ago at Disney's EPCOT centre, I tried out the "Brain Skiing" game by Mind Drive. It was freakishly accurate.

      CNN from 1996 (wow - needs a fast 486!)
      http://www.cnn.com/TECH/9609/18/mind.drive/

      Another article about the company
      http://www.abilitymagazine.com/seymour_minddrive .h tml

      The company's website
      http://www.other90.com/

      --
      If a square is really a rhombus, why aren't all triangles purple?
    3. Re:old news by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2

      The Air Force must not have gotten too far because DARPA is currently requesting proposals for research leading to a Brain-Machine interface.

      Yeah, I remember that now. They weren't doing too well with it, the guy testing it could think certain words and they'd appear, and could move a cursor around a bit, but that was it - no 'computing at the speed of thought' or anything. They might have been just trying to get it to the point where a pilot could move his radar cursor around.

    4. Re:old news by Paradoxish · · Score: 1

      Hmm. I hope there aren't any schizophrenic (sp?) air force pilots. "I think I'll turn right. Or left. No, right! Up! Down! AHHHH!" *crash*

      --
      If you need to interpret my post, then you don't get it.
    5. Re:Old news by Geekboy(Wizard) · · Score: 1

      Anyone who has ever worked tech support knows that this technology is nothing new. Every day our voice mail is full of these mouse controlling monkey-brained folks.

      YOU get monkeys!?! I would love to be able to talk to something as advanced as monkeys.

  36. FIREFOX LIVES !!!!! by CDWert · · Score: 4, Funny

    Alright now all we need a plane you could fly this way :)

    Seriously think of the plethora of military applications, Im sure they are. I wonder how much room for error or lingering thoughts there is .

    Its esay , sometimes to think about something and not pysically execute that movement. WHAT HAPPENS when you JUST THINK and it happens, I could think of all kinds of scenarios this would be MUY bad, remember the end of the first ghostbusters movie :)

    Typing in this manner or "mousing" would be pretty cool if they could come up with a completley exeternal device, having wires sewn into my brain sac dont sound like much fun. Hopefully this is a firt step in 2 way electronic to neural communication links, think about what a computer could teach a person who was say paralyzed, analyze neural paths and make calculated reccomndations for rerouting directly to the brain, that was your movement would be through EXISTING undamaged pathways, then again a glitch in the software might make you wet your pants every time you try to scratch you foot but hey its progress :)

    --
    Sig went tro...aahemmm.....fishing........
    1. Re:FIREFOX LIVES !!!!! by Em+Emalb · · Score: 3, Funny

      "I could think of all kinds of scenarios this would be MUY bad, remember the end of the first ghostbusters movie :)"

      What--you don't like toasted marshmallows?

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
    2. Re:FIREFOX LIVES !!!!! by markmoss · · Score: 2

      I wasn't far into my own stint in the Air Force when I decided that a brain-controlled combat plane would be an extremely bad idea. Let's see now: Colonel Jones calls together his pilots, and informs them that due to an extremely heavy schedule of combat missions, leaves are canceled, and they are all confined to base until further notice. Then the Colonel climbs into his airplane and leads a dozen of those pilots into combat, each with the trigger wired into his brain. The colonel isn't coming back, because someone's going to think "I want to kill that bastard" just a little too hard.

      And the peacetime AF is a nice, friendly organization as military units go. In infantry, if the privates don't want to kill the sergeant, he's not trying hard enough. Really, the obvious plan of infantry training is to get the men riled up and ready to kill _something_, but not quite enough to forget that there's a death penalty for attacking a superior. And then tell them the reason they're here, living outdoors, eating mystery rations, and getting harassed by sergeants and officers, is because of those bastards over there -- and it's OK to kill _them_!

    3. Re:FIREFOX LIVES !!!!! by Murdoc · · Score: 1

      WHAT HAPPENS when you JUST THINK and it happens

      I've been collecting news articles about this since Oct. '98. From what I understand, once your brain gets used to the chip being there, moving the cursor, or whatever, is just like moving your arm. You think, it happens, but not if you're just "imagining" it, like imagining to move your arm. You have to actually send the correct impulse. Bio-feedback already is used to gain control of your heart and such things, and similar techniques would be useful for training to use this.

      Even if the part of your brain they connect the chip to is being used for something else, you'll notice right away with the output wildly fluctuating, until you learn to bring it under control. The brain would shunt the previous function (probably) to another area, allow this area to be used for the chip. Worst case scenario, if the brain can't "shunt" the previious function, is that you have to think of aunt Thelma when you move the cursor, or remember what peaches smell like, etc. Of course, I'm just speculating here.

      --
      Our ignorance is not so vast as our failure to use what we know. - M. King Hubbert
  37. Old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember watching some PBS show about a decade ago that had humans doing this.... Being able to control a small cursor to an extent. Is this really new or what?

  38. What other diseases/conditions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article mentions that it will hopefully help people who are paralyzed or have Lou Gehrig's Disease. If a person had Parkinson's Disease, would the cursor just jump around the screen? What about Alzheimer's, does the cursor start to move toward a button, then wander about aimlessly? And of course, with the ADA forcing government websites to have "sticky buttons" for blind people, how will that be implemented?

  39. Airline pilots!?!?! by Graelin · · Score: 1

    From the article:

    ...Even more challenging are ``Terminator''-type applications that would allow the minds of healthy individuals to meld with machines--allowing drivers to ``think'' their way through traffic, for example, or granting pilots the ability to navigate the skies with their mind....

    I can see it now... "Pilot falls asleep at the wheel.. Dreams of 20,000 leagues under the sea... 300 dead..."

    This article lacks details, but I don't understand how they're going to turn moving a cursor into piloting a 20-ton rocket-powered tin can...

  40. This would not work by flikx · · Score: 1

    Because most people do not think before they click. Hence to effectiveness of goatse.cx links and the like.

    Forcing users to think before clicking may vastly increase the quality of the internet.

    --
    One future, two choices. Oppose them or let them destroy us.
  41. good news! by mrroot · · Score: 5, Funny

    ``In fact,'' she said, ``we found that he became quite reluctant to move his arm to the reach command once the cursor was introduced into the game. Apparently it was easier just to think about reaching.''

    Wow, this is good news not just for the handicapped but also for those of us who are just plain lazy. Often times I find myself _thinking_ of doing things but never actually _doing_ them.

    --
    I Heart Sorting Networks
  42. more fun for me by athagon · · Score: 1

    Guys: just think of the possibilities! Browsing your favorite porn site, navigating through it with your mind, both hands off the keyboard... ^_~;

    --
    I think, therefore, I'm smarter than our president.
  43. Here comes the patents! by pheph · · Score: 4, Funny

    US Patent #5,960,412 : One-Thought-Shopping:

    A method and system for placing an order to purchase an item via the Internet. The order is placed by a purchaser at a client brain and received by a server system. The server system receives purchaser information including identification of the purchaser, payment information, and shipment information from the client brain. The server system then assigns a client identifier to the client brain and associates the assigned client identifier with the received purchaser information. The server system sends to the client system the assigned client identifier and an HTML document identifying the item and including an order button. The client brain receives and stores the assigned client identifier and receives and displays the HTML document. In response to the selection of the order button, the client brain sends to the server system a request to purchase the identified item. The server system receives the request and combines the purchaser information associated with the client identifier of the client brain to generate an order to purchase the item in accordance with the billing and shipment information whereby the purchaser effects the ordering of the product by selection of the order button.

    1. Re:Here comes the patents! by s0l0m0n · · Score: 1

      Waitaminutehere!!!

      I was only thinking about buying the uberrubersextoy! I didn't actually want it. Now I'm thinking about wanting my money back, you gouging bastards!

  44. some nitty-gritty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    > The article doesn't have much detail on the actual transmition of the signal...

    the website for the lab has a more high-falutin' description of the lab's general research area; note that neither the lab site nor the most recent paper that i could find mentions the "monkey plays video games" experiment in detail.

  45. Why a mokney? by rootmonkey · · Score: 1

    Why would you use a monkey, they had to train him to think about moving with out moving. First off how do you do that, why not use a human?

    --

    Yes but every time I try to see it your way, I get a headache.
    1. Re:Why a mokney? by simetra · · Score: 1


      There's no minimum wage for monkeys.

      --

      "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
    2. Re:Why a mokney? by davidhan · · Score: 1

      why not use a human?

      I'm guessing the part where they implant the electrodes in the brain scares people off.

    3. Re:Why a mokney? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about all the afgans in cuba?

  46. take away the mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Step 1: Condition monkey to point mouse cursor at picture of food, to receive food reward.

    Step 2: Record neural signature before and during actions of Step 1.

    Step 3: Remove mouse from monkey.

    Step 4: Show picture of food along with picture of mouse cursor, at a random relative angle.

    Step 5: Reward monkey if and only if detecting neural signature of monkey making correct mouse vector movement.

    Step 6: Repeat steps 4 and 5.

    Step 7: Publish statistics.

    Frankly, I won't be satisfied until they wire the monkey's brain to the Universal Translator

    1. Re:take away the mouse by Inthewire · · Score: 0
      Frankly, I won't be satisfied until they wire the monkey's brain to the Universal Translator

      From the Universal Translator site:
      New topic added - Housekeeper.
      The phrases are selected with special purpose of covering about 95% of the communication needs of the property owners or tenants dealing with foreign speaking housekeepers.
      Now, UT-103 recognizes, translates into Spanish, Russian or French, and pronounces over 200 phrases on the subject.

      Tell me that is a joke page. It is, right? I mean...can this be for real?
      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
    2. Re:take away the mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's even easier

      Step 1: Condition monkey to point mouse cursor at picture of food, to receive food reward.

      Step 2: Remove monkey's arms

    3. Re:take away the mouse by pangloss · · Score: 2

      yes, but i thought it was precisely the recording of the neural sig that was the hard part. there was a wired article not too long ago (ah, found it --i think it was the one with the ucla researchers) about just how imprecise/crude the recording is w/ current (non-invasive?) technology.

    4. Re:take away the mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Invasiveness is a continuum, not a bright line.

  47. Wearable Computing by Xiver · · Score: 1

    I think the applications for wearable computing should excite everyone.

    --
    10: PRINT "Everything old is new again."
    20: GOTO 10
  48. Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought Apple kept their R&D top secret! Go iMonkey!

  49. Hmm... by Psx29 · · Score: 1

    Further reading states that this technology can be used with the paralyzed or those with Lou Gehrig's Disease to allow them to use their computers." Now thats all great a dandy but wouldn't this technology better applied for artificial limbs that could function like a regular body part?

  50. Can anyone say Quake5??!! by 1stflight · · Score: 1

    Let's see how Carmack intergrates this tech into his next FPS!!

  51. it could kill you by TechnoLust · · Score: 1

    I think they meant that the surguery could kill you. Anytime you poke something in your brain, it has the potential to turn out bad. They could however, use the MRI to scan for the patterns, just like they used the MRI to record where it was happening, they just need a more sensitive MRI.

    --
    "Da ist ein Technölüst in mein Unterpanten!"
  52. The only reason the monkey could do this... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

    is because Dr. Sam Beckett was really inside the monkey's head.

  53. hook 'em up to the Universal Translator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who needs sign language when you have a talking dictionary? www.ectaco.com/ut

  54. Just a small clarification... by Sooner+Boomer · · Score: 2, Informative

    As the article states, the monkeys controlled a screen cursor, not a mouse cursor. There was no mechanical pointing device (mouse, trackball, etc.) involved. What sets this research apart from other work done in this area is that electrodes were implanted directly into a specific, targeted, area of the brain. Other research had been done with either generalized implanted electrodes or surface electrodes (like are used on an EEG machine).

    --
    Chaos maximizes locally around me.
  55. Integrating protheses in the neural loop by SysKoll · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The real nifty applications will come when this neuronal interfacing technology will be used to bypass deficient nerve links (spine damage) or to supplement/replace deficient muscle (muscular dystrophy and a ton of other debilitating illnesses).

    I think focusing on computers is missing the point. It's not the ability to send email that is important here. It's the possibility of having protheses and artificial capacities integrated in the neural feedback loop. Prothesic legs that 1) you can contol by thought instead of having to provide commands, and 2) send back balance information, now that would be a revolution.

    We are getting closer. That's an excellent news.

    -- SysKoll
    --

    --
    Mad science! Robots! Underwear! Cute girls! Full comic online! http://www.girlgeniusonline.com/

    1. Re:Integrating protheses in the neural loop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed; we might someday even be able to plug in to a Universal Translator

    2. Re:Integrating protheses in the neural loop by freakpower · · Score: 3, Informative

      Indeed. Prosthetics are the most plausible useful application of this technology for the near future. I still puzzle at the claim that several neurons were identified in the initiation and control of volutary movement, though. Every voluntary muscle command channel contains several feedback loops that essentially dampen and modify the signal to ensure that the movement doesn't overshoot or fall short of the target. These signals come from cells within muslces that inform the brain of the amount of current tension in the muscle and from specialized neurons within the joints that report flexion angle with one-degree accuracy.

      People without the most important of these channels basically have Parkinsons. They can initiate action, but the action is delayed because they have a difficult time ending their previous action. Similarly, they shake violently the entire time, because of the grossly overestimated signals coming from their motor cortex. This makes me wonder how fine the mouse movement control could have been on the part of the monkey. People with parkinsons are severaly disabled, but might still be able to complete such a large-scale task with 90% accuracy, too.

      To really use this for prosthetics, you'd have to not only detect the impulse to commit the action, but you'd also probably have to send signals back up via the remaining somatic nerves [in the case of amputation] or directly into the brain [in the case of degenerative disease.] Mental signals are not a matter of On or Off, they are on a sliding scale from strongly inhibitory to strongly excitatory. Signal regulation is the golden egg.

      If these are the few neurons responsible for initiation of reaching action, how can the rest of the system determine when the monkey means to reach normally or reach virtually? I'd like to know whether there was any twitch in the arm when the mental cursor was moving.

      There is a fantastic difference between "up, down, left & right" and "reach for and grasp object 3 feet from here." It's nice to see enthusiasm, but it's a little premature.

    3. Re:Integrating protheses in the neural loop by zurab · · Score: 1

      It's not the ability to send email that is important here. It's the possibility of having protheses and artificial capacities integrated in the neural feedback loop. Prothesic legs that 1) you can contol by thought instead of having to provide commands, and 2) send back balance information, now that would be a revolution.

      I am not very scientific in this but I think this could have a very far-reaching effect. If I have an artificial leg and I just thought of kicking yer ass, will the leg kick you? If yes, could I defend myself from pushing you into a moving car by arguing that I didn't really want to do it, I just thought about it, and I can't control my thoughts like my actions?

      Maybe the system should provide a Javascript pop-up to OK/Cancel the thought, or even better a mandatory preview button to estimate the result before posting it. Wait a minute... what was I talking about?

    4. Re:Integrating protheses in the neural loop by Spam+Bandito · · Score: 1

      From what I've read, controlling the artificial leg would be very similar to controlling a real leg; you can think of kicking someone's ass all you want, but nothing happens unless you actually try to do it. There's a difference between thinking about doing something and actually sending the signal to your muscles.

      --
      Krama: Exlnelect (msltoy affteced by rreesceahrs at Elgisnh uetnirisvys)
    5. Re:Integrating protheses in the neural loop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a difference between thinking about doing something and actually sending the signal to your muscles.



      ...also known as the difference between cerebral and cerebelum activity. And then there's another theory that alpha (low frequency encephalograph) waves indicate sensory uptake, and higher frequency beta waves indicate planning and action. So, to put the theories together, don't accept it as an action unless it is a high-frequency cerebelum pattern.

    6. Re:Integrating protheses in the neural loop by jwkane · · Score: 1

      Certainly we shouldn't start drilling electrode holes in our skulls, but this experiment is a huge step. The 'fantastic difference' is one of degree, not type. In the long run this may be the technology that kills the mouse, keyboard, and eventually monitor. Yes, this is only one step on a long road. But it's one hell of a destination, so the enthusiasm is understandable.

  56. Commercial applications already exist by kobotronic · · Score: 2, Informative

    These guys have had a commercially available
    brain actuated mouse cursor gizmo out for years.

    http://www.brainfingers.com/cyberlink.htm

    1. Re:Commercial applications already exist by ancalagon · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's called

      one thought order

      If you think of a certain book, you have purchased in that moment. Amazon holds a patent on that already.

    2. Re:Commercial applications already exist by savage_panda · · Score: 1

      On the website. The Cyberlink System includes: -The Cyberlink Interface Unit -The Cyberlink Headband/Sensor Harness -Three Sensors -One Tube of Cybergel What could possibly be the use for CyberGel?

    3. Re:Commercial applications already exist by Gathius · · Score: 1

      Looks like it's been years since they've updated their site too....

      Minimum computer system requirements:

      Pentium CPU or compatible (100 MHz or faster clock speed)
      One of the following operating systems :

      MS-DOS version. 6.0 or higher
      Windows 3.1
      Windows 95 / 98

      8 MB RAM (16 MB for Windows 95/98)
      10 MB free hard disk space
      Two AA batteries

      ~~
      I think I would be a little hesitant to drop $1995.00 on this device... but look at the sweet games that come with it! :P

    4. Re:Commercial applications already exist by Spam+Bandito · · Score: 1

      It's used to moisturize the skin so as to provide a better connection for the sensors. Although I'm sure you had something else in mind :-)

      --
      Krama: Exlnelect (msltoy affteced by rreesceahrs at Elgisnh uetnirisvys)
  57. Red Butt Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hehehe... The mascot would be I.R. Baboon with a penguin tattooed to his butt.

  58. they're doing it backwards by jbrelie · · Score: 1

    Studies have shown that the human mind can re-allocate sections for other uses... perhaps instead of isolating the specific centers that perform these functions, they should find the general area and work on 'training the brain' It would be a hell of a lot easier and I bet the advances would move faster as well.
    But I am just an idiot with a computer. No medical training here other than Discovery and TLC.

  59. Sounds great and all... by pimpinmonk · · Score: 1

    Sounds great and all... but does it come with a scroll wheel?

  60. GWB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now even he can use the computer

  61. was it .jp company - w/TV RC in mind? precision?? by BACbKA · · Score: 1

    Me too, although I had this off some Russian media at that time. I vaguely remember it, but IIRC, it was a Japanese company that was doing the research at that time, and they had a working prototype FOR HUMANS (not monkeys) that allowed channel flipping up or down. And they were saying they're looking into things like 2D movements + selection (equivalent of a 1-button mouse). I won't be surprised if someone can dig up an existing Japanese patent on this all from that time!

    They also said then (in that article) that they started with electrodes hooked up to pretty random places on one's scull (maybe still within certain areas), then feeding it up to an oscillograph, and then, after a 15-minute training session, a human was always able (via the visual feedback) to do things with that waveform on the screen as instructed. Next step was their RC prototype. They said it required 15 minutes of training before it was usable.

    OTOH, I don't think they seriously talked about applying this tech to people with disabilities then. Actually, they mentioned that they don't think any serious machinery hookup was possible at that stage because they feared glitches (like, someone frightens you, and your telepathic wheelchair uncontrollably rushes from the sidewalk and into the traffic...)

    I don't see any of these addressed in this recent (/.-posted) article at all, BTW.

    --

    VKh

  62. Dear Mr. Pheph by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have illegally cut and pasted Amazon.com's latest patent application onto this website. You will send me your name and address so my legal team, I. Cheatham and Howe, may begin legal procedings against you.

  63. Monkey XP by DrJohnEvans · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Okay. So you've replaced your mouse with a direct link to your brain. Let's say you're using Windows XP (because of brain damage from the operation). Does that mean that if you try to learn anything, Microsoft will charge you for upgrading your hardware?

  64. Why not more than mouse movement? by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

    If it is able to translate the data needed for mouse movement, how much harder would it be to get other forms of input?

    Thought typing (direct dictation) would seem to be much faster than the fingers. It would be a short leap from there to get thought -> simulated speech working.

  65. Great... by s0l0m0n · · Score: 1

    First we had an infinite number of monkeys with keyboards, now they have mice, too?

  66. blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...allowed a monkey to control a mouse cursor...

    They've been able to do that for a while I thought. They're called MCSEs.

  67. Banana's by Thakandar2 · · Score: 1

    ...and reportedly, when let to surf the web, the monkey kept resetting it's home page to www.chiquita.com

  68. Stephen Hawking - ALS by djneko · · Score: 1
    Fantastic. Stephen Hawking does pretty damned well the way he is know. Imagine what he might be able to do if he were re-unleashed upon the world as Robo-Hawking!

    --
    `/\/\
    (^.^)
    (")(")
    not quite an analog pussy, just a cat that plays with vinyl
  69. Conspiracy theorists! Get your tinfoil hats ready! by Cutriss · · Score: 4, Funny

    Keyloggers are a thing of the past now! Now the big bad men in suits can just sit outside your apartment and scan your brainwaves to detect all your pr0n and warez passwords! Just think! Or...erm...don't!

    --
    "Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
  70. Interesting press release by blakestah · · Score: 3, Informative

    This press release is kinda interesting. First, the work was presented over two months ago. Second, the work was carried out in the lab of Richard Andersen. Yet Andersen, who has spent a lot of the last decade reorganizing his lab around such efforts, was not mentioned. Instead, Meeker, a graduate student on the project was named. In addition, all this work in the Andersen lab was spearheaded by a person who is now at Stanford, Krishna Shenoy who recently left the lab. In addition, the intellectual property for the project, the patents, are co-authored by Andersen and Shenoy.

    It's kinda weird when you know a bit about the work behind these press releases, and then see how it is actually presented to the "lay" public.

    Personally, I think the project has a low probability of success. A neural prosthetic device should be interfaced with as peripheral part of the nervous system as possible. This group has chosen to use as abstract a part of the nervous system as possible. But maybe they'll prove me wrong.

    1. Re:Interesting press release by Irie · · Score: 1

      Since when do lowly grad students get top billing on a paper/project over their faculty advisor?? That's just all kinds of not right...

      --
      use Signature::Witty;
    2. Re:Interesting press release by lukesl · · Score: 1

      Personally, I think the project has a low probability of success. A neural prosthetic device should be interfaced with as peripheral part of the nervous system as possible. This group has chosen to use as abstract a part of the nervous system as possible. But maybe they'll prove me wrong.

      I think there's some truth in that, but the fact that they used posterior parietal cortex instead of primary motor cortex or the spinal cord makes the work that much more interesting for actually understanding brain function. I mean, if you really wanted a neural prosthesis to work, you could stick electrodes in every muscle and control whatever you want based on small twitches that were too small to actually move the body around. The interesting thing about this is that there's been lots of work done, by Andersen and others (including a lab I used to work in), on the role of posterior parietal cortex in figuring out the important aspects of sensory input (e.g. what to look at in a given visual scene). Since there is a role in motor planning, it's an interesting place to look at how sensory input comes in and is analyzed and an appropriate motor response generated. In essence, that's almost all of what the brain really does.

  71. Old news by Lxy · · Score: 2

    neural technology that allowed a monkey to control a mouse

    Anyone who has ever worked tech support knows that this technology is nothing new. Every day our voice mail is full of these mouse controlling monkey-brained folks.

    --

    There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
    :wq
  72. Maybe a new low for me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I guess we can really find out if what my old coworkers used to say about monkeys beating me at Q3 deathmatch is true!

  73. already happening minus the head wounds by rhh · · Score: 1

    Their has already been progress in this area sans head wounds. Instead of jacking your head full of wires, sensors detect the electric activity of the brain through the scalp. The USAF was experimenting with flying planes this way but gave up after a few very promising results concluding that it would take too long to train pilots in this manner to be effective. There was also a few PBS specials about this last year. http://www.pbs.org/saf/1107/resources/resources-5. htm RHh "Moon's milk spills from my unquiet skull" -Coil

  74. Thinking vs Planning (was Re:FIREFOX LIVES !!!!!) by hawkstone · · Score: 1

    Its esay , sometimes to think about something and not pysically execute that movement. WHAT HAPPENS when you JUST THINK and it happens, I could think of all kinds of scenarios this would be MUY bad, remember the end of the first ghostbusters movie :)

    There is a real distinction here between "thinking about doing it" and "plan on doing it". You can think about doing lots of things, but this doesn't mean you will. This is important, because it actually applies here.

    When you are about to move your mouse, some pre-initiation of the neurons that do the moving actually happens. This is happening about when your muscles start to contract, but before any actual movement happens.

    In other words, you have to actually make a conscious effort to pretend to command your arm to move. It does not make your arm move, but it's a lot more like making the cursor move instead of thinking about it moving. This is the right behavior for such a system, IMHO.

  75. Re:Good training - wrong question by Havokmon · · Score: 3, Insightful
    "Going one step further, her team then trained the monkey to simply think about a movement, without reaching out and touching the screen."

    So how exactly do you train a monkey to think about doing something without doing it?

    I would ask why they even wasted their time training a monkey to *think* about moving a mouse. Just give him the mouse, and disconnect the damn thing.

    THEN, if successful, maybe go to that step.. but since we don't need paralyzed monkey's moving mice, I would recommend doing something a little more useful.

    --
    "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
  76. Five Assed Monkey!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mefesto: And here is the Five assed Monkey!!!

    finally he can surf the web without one of his asses getting in the way

  77. They will soon.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cool, which mean they will soon discovered neural technology that allowed a human to control a mouse cursor using the brain!

  78. Well, this still eliminates "Frist Posters" by Tri0de · · Score: 1

    Since it requires a brain.

    --
    "Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts."
  79. Beating a Dead Horse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hate to tell you people but this kind of thing isn't new. Sure, this latest development is a bit more advanced, but the science is far from new. Just look "biofeedback" on google and learn for yourself.

    Here are a few examples

    http://www.lems.brown.edu/~scp/eegremotecontrolc ar .pdf

    http://www.discover.com/99awards/assist.html

    http://immi.inesc.pt/alcacer01/procs/pdfs/colema n_ final.pdf

    http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/context/22958/0

    Though /. thinks I'm only an Anonymous Coward, I am actually...

    mugwamp !!!!

  80. Potential for abuse... by MenTaLguY · · Score: 4, Interesting

    While I'm sure this could substantially enhance the lives of the paralyzed (for example), the widespread use of such systems in e.g. driving or piloting (particularly by healthy individuals) could be a real problem.

    If there's one lesson the Internet has taught us, it's that the less separation there is between thought and action, the more people will do stupid things.

    The area of the brain mentioned in the article has to do with the early "desire to act", long before many of the normal checks and balances governing our actions come into play.

    Has anyone seen the episode of Red Dwarf where Lister gets the prosthetic arm and can't stop it from beating up Kryten?

    --

    DNA just wants to be free...
  81. Atari by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    About 15 years ago I remember reading in Antic about an Atari game control to do something like this. Not quite the same but reading the muscle inputs on your forehead. Here is a link: Atari Mindlink.

  82. Head cheese for my mouse by MrIcee · · Score: 1
    If I put my *way back hat* on.... it strikes me that a company used to build a *mind tracker* and sold it for the original Apple series... the device was a band that fitted around your head and did basic biofeedback sensing. You then *trained* the software for up/down/left/right. Though I'm sure that this new mechanism is more accurate and capable.

    Makes me wonder though... will it be plug-n-pray or will I have to install a DLL? And... with XP wanting to know everything about the user... will it also want to know what I'm thinking? Makes the term HEAD CRASH have a whole new meaning (not to mention a HEAD COLD and other viruses).

    And will I be violating DMCA by allowing another *mind* to use my mouse? What if I have multiple personalities... is that a single or multiple user license.

    I'm confused.

  83. While you all may joke. . . by foo+fighter · · Score: 2

    . . .I'm all for increased computer accessibility, and this is an important step.

    Everytime I'm out mountain biking, or inline skating, or kicking ass in a bar fight I worry about what I'll do if I break my arm or hand.

    This technology isn't just for people with debilitating disease or amputees. It's for the punk who tried an eight foot jump on his cross country hardtail and bit it hard.

    Here's an exercise for those of you reading this right now. Try to move to the last story without using your hands.

    Anything that makes computers easier to use I'm all for.

    --
    obviously no deficiencies vs. no obvious deficiencies
    1. Re:While you all may joke. . . by FatChuck · · Score: 1
      "Here's an exercise for those of you reading this right now. Try to move to the last story without using your hands."

      Pleeeeease, that was hands-down the easiest thing I've done all week. Apply nose tip to "End" button and voila, I'm there!

      :-).

  84. Further Reading by Yurian · · Score: 4, Informative
    There's quite a bit of this stuff going on - Just last week I was talking to the guy in the Engineering department here that has a project doing something similar. I can't seem to find his site at the moment, but the ABI project is another similar effort with a nice, informative site at about the same level of development.

    The actual reseacrh described in the Yahoo article using implanted electrodes seems a bit strange - though the claim to have identified a few individual neurons is interesting.

    Most of the other groups are working with stick-on electrodes. At the moment all they can do is move a mosue around a screen and click, but progress seems to be good - Correct recognition is around 70% after 5 one-hour sessions, which sounds impressive to me. The big obstacle to getting this into service for real people with disabilities is that the hardware is currently a bit chunky, especially the EEG machine. But we all know what happens to hardware, very, very quickly.

    Oh - and, yes, the guy i talked to says the thing that secretlty drives him is eventually using it to play Quake. (Wonderful thing, altrusim)

    Now wouldn't that be cool.(Unfortuantely you have to shave your head, I think!)

  85. In a related story... by jogoodma · · Score: 1

    In a related story, Amazon.com has just filed a patent with the US Patent office for the "One-Thought Checkout Store".

  86. And then the monkey typed... by UsonianAutomatic · · Score: 1

    ... PRAY FOR MOJO

  87. Wait...I saw the movies--- by tino_sup · · Score: 2, Funny

    Great, here we go, next thing you know our decendants will be ruled by super monkeys.

    Let me say it now 'Get your filthy paws off me you damned dirty clicking ape'.

    Borg monkeys will be the bane of organ grinders everywhere.

    Regards,

    --
    I am me...I think
  88. Games, and Neural Tech.. Cheats? by RageMachine · · Score: 1

    It would be scary to think that this could be applied to video games.

    Think of this: You are sitting there playing Quake3 with your mouse, and all of a sudden this guy comes in acting like a bot. But he is not a bot. He is a man that has the ability to 'think' his shots. This guy can be dead accurate every time, just by thinking of where to shoot, instead of having to rely on hand-eye response times.

    I wonder if this would not scare most gamers.

    --

    --------------------------
    Is this a sig?
    --------------------------
  89. I'm scared by DrNibbler · · Score: 1

    5 mins after this article was posted my boss was on the phone with the zoo. Now he's telling me to take a week off.

    --
    Sean.OutaHere()
  90. But...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But what about ANAL COX?

  91. More information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Daniella is part of Richard Anderson's lab at Caltech. They research motor planning and spatial orientation. It is a very interesting place.

    As pointed out in the article, the area from which they record makes this experiment significantly different from previous ones. Several lab have done similar work, but they were less sure of the origin of their signal. Much of the sensory and motors areas of the cortex are right next to each other. It was not clear whether the recorded signals were motor signals or sensory signals driven by stretch sensors within muscles or something similar. The area Daniella records from is fairly far away from sensory cortex. There is much less chance that they are recording feedback from the sensory side. For comparison, examine an older story from a team of competitors.

  92. add also VR googles and IRL goes poof!! by StarBar · · Score: 1

    This is what I have waited for. A truly scientific project legalizing laziness to its extreme!! These guys have the budget and brains make something that will not sell and will be baught by some buziness minded content owner who will add VR googles and a multiuser 3D world.... Just like Count Zero's mummy was hooked up in the interactive soap opera (William Gibson) and killed during a date with the main male star in VR!! Virtual will goes real and vice versa. I will add Pizza Express to my stock portfolio asap

    Now we are just waiting for the neural feedback generator brain plug-in and why not the enzyme dropper generator feeding your brain with controlled doozes of dope to get happy, sad, angry etc...

    I will never get bored again!!! :-))

  93. this technology's been around for some time by Hadlock · · Score: 1

    i saw this technology being demo'd in it's infancy on PBS on a brain documentary of some sort about 5 years ago. the corner of the screen was outlined in the shape of an L, ranging from 50% up the screen, to 50% across. the lady was hooked up to i guess 15 electrodes, and had to "think" a certian way. depending on what she did, the "cursor" would accelerate rapidly twords the L, or far away from it. Eventually she got up to about a 35% accuracy rate, but that's early 90's technology for you.

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
  94. Next M$ OS by vortexSurpher · · Score: 1

    Great! Now M$ will get a new monopoly and we'll all have to get a subsciption to WinHuman 2.0

    Needing to crash for a while takes on a whole new meaning.

    --

    I'm out of my mind, but feel free to leave a message.
  95. Paralasis and (Computers or Walking) by Vis · · Score: 1

    So, with this technology, someone who is paralyzed could theoretically use a computer. What about allowing the parapalegic to walk again? Gyroscopes to measure balance (this technology exists well in IT, as we have seen recently), and thought to say, "Hmmm.. I think I'd like to walk forward. Now backwards. Now left."

    I'd love to see my parapalegic friend be able to ride his motorcycle with me without a side car some day.

    --
    -- Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!
  96. wireless by Garyman_2000 · · Score: 0

    and I thought wireless mice/mouses and keyboards were cool.

  97. What's going through the monkey's head? by Squirrel+Killer · · Score: 1
    So how exactly do you train a monkey to think about doing something without doing it? I'm quite surprised that they were able to do that with the current level of communication between primates and humans
    Yeah, how do we know that the monkey wasn't actually thinking about that cute red-butted baboon when his mouse was busy installing Windows?
  98. Allows a monkey to control a mouse? by Space+Coyote · · Score: 1

    Control a mouse? Oh a mouse cursor. Dang. And here I thought I'd have my unholy army of the night sooner than I had thought.

    --
    ___
    Cogito cogito, ergo cogito sum.
  99. I don't like that!! I DONT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All this crap is sponsored by banner ad companies. When the technology is sufficiently developed, they will add motion feedback, so that our *thoughts* would be triggered by banners!! AWWW!

  100. More Info by Yurian · · Score: 1
    Wow - I just been reading a little more on their site. They're futher along than I though. This is a quote from an confrence where they demoed their system:
    Three visitors experimented ABI. In less than 1 hour of training they achieved rather good performances. In particular, a lady was able to write something without errors on an on-screen keyboard and play the computer game Pac-Man. This confirms the adaptive capabilities of ABI.
    Playing PacMan qith your mind! This is just too much for me!
  101. Angry monkey... by Rothfuss · · Score: 5, Funny

    The details:

    First the monkey was tricked into installing "Comet Cursor." Then, after the 17th X10 popup ad, he finally just began hurling feces at the monitor. Fortunately, Matthew Broderick came along and rescued him.

  102. "reluctant to move" by wowbagger · · Score: 2

    I love the part about how the monkey, once it realized that it didn't have to move in order to get the computer to respond, became reluctant to move.

    This is much like what happens when a man gets a remote control - he becomes reluctant to move...

    Seriously though, the question is, are the neurons they are watching affected by diseases like ALS? If so, then this sort of technique wouldn't benefit people like Dr. Hawking....

  103. Bio-Feedback Mouse Cursors are Old News by netsplit · · Score: 1

    Years ago, sometime around 1995. I remember hearing about research -- and seeing news clips on TV about a similar technology.

    The Albany Medical Center in Upstate NY funded inhouse research into biofeedback devices for handicapped accessibility of computers. They showed an ANSI or VT100 terminal with a colored 'dot' that human test subjects could move about the screen after a bit of training.

    I believe this was accomplished using magnetic resonance detectors of some sort on the surface of the skull. Im not completely sure about this part.

    I always wondered what happened to that technology and why I had not heard anything since. Can anyone provide links/insight to back this up? .. or similar research along the same lines?

  104. woot! by fearboy · · Score: 1, Funny

    "...or those with Lou Gehrig's Disease to allow them to use their computers."

    whoa....the mighty stephen hawking (already a "fucking quake master") with implants...step back.

    ...You say, "impressive", I already know it,
    I'm a hardcore player and I'm not afraid to show it.
    I got a Phd in pain and a masters in disaster,
    the mighty Stephen Hawking is a fucking QuakeMaster...

    --
    every good .sig i have is stolen.
  105. Re:Good training - wrong question by Squirrel+Killer · · Score: 1
    I would ask why they even wasted their time training a monkey to *think* about moving a mouse. Just give him the mouse, and disconnect the damn thing.
    That is the most completely perfect solution that I never would have even though of in a lifetime.

    -sk

  106. Other needy groups by Geeyzus · · Score: 1

    Further reading states that this technology can be used with the paralyzed or those with Lou Gehrig's Disease to allow them to use their computers

    Come on... what about "the lazy"? I'm sick of pushing down keys and clicking the mouse, it's like doing thousands of tiny push-ups every day! I don't need this strain!!!

  107. Three words: by akad0nric0 · · Score: 1

    hands-free pr0n

    --
    akad0nric0

    This sentence no verb.
  108. In this environment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has nobody noticed that Daniella Meeker is beautiful, for real.

  109. You obviously don't work where I work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have to communicate with primates all the time. This mouse could be a godsend for all the computer illiterate office types... just as long as I am the one that gets to jam the wires in their ears every morning, thank you.

    :p

  110. Who cares about controlling a mouse? by sielwolf · · Score: 1

    I wanna braintap to a roof mounted machinegun so I can kill damn hippie protesters!

    *Ratta tat tat!*

    "Take THAT counter-culture!"

    --
    What is music when you despise all sound?
  111. Technology is not discovered by xee · · Score: 1

    It is invented. Knowledge is discovered. Technology isn't.

    --
    Oh shit! I forgot to click "Post Anonymously"...
  112. About time.. by mtrupe · · Score: 1

    Maybe this will lead to mouse devices for labtops that are actually usable.

  113. This is old news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've know for years that monkeys could use mice, that is the reason AOL is around.

  114. Watch out for BonziBuddy! by Cheetah86 · · Score: 1

    What if the monkeys had some kind of spyware where they got personal information from us and sent it to some big corporation... Oh, wait, its been done...

  115. reverse engineer that monkey by teslatug · · Score: 0

    It would be pretty cool if they hooked that monkey up with a Segway and let it loose among the general population.

  116. I want this tech!!! by TheCarp · · Score: 2, Funny

    I want it...I must have these implants. I must have them for one reason and one reason only... the most important reason of all!

    So I can say
    "It is by will alone that I set my cursor in motion"

    -Steve

    --
    "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  117. If you think popups are bad... by PotatoHead · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just wait until someone discovers that by displaying a shocking image, they can trigger the click.

    Some poor schmuck triggers the wrong thing, gets trapped in the pr0n maze and ends up in the hospital with 'schizoid forced feedback syndrome'.

    After the various lawsuits work their way through the system...

    Someone else will come out with 'web blinders' for the safe calm web experience. No one should surf without them, or Peace of mind is a precious thing, preserving it with Web Blinders is the easiest most effective investment toward your future sanity you can make today.

    1. Re:If you think popups are bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, IRIX does kick Ass! (Really!)

      I assume you misspelled "suck" as "kick".

      It's OK, I forgive you this time.

    2. Re:If you think popups are bad... by PotatoHead · · Score: 1

      Dude, you do not even want to go there. Since you are just an AC, I can let that slide, but if you want any real discussion about the merits good or bad or IRIX, why don't you try getting out your slash account, logging in and backing some of that trash up.

    3. Re:If you think popups are bad... by Winged+Cat · · Score: 1

      Shock of this nature wears off eventually. It could get one, two...maybe a full handful or two of clicks. But, sooner rather than later, most people would come to expect and adapt to the sudden images; I doubt almost any unwilling subject would be trapped for more than a few minutes at the extreme.

    4. Re:If you think popups are bad... by PotatoHead · · Score: 1

      You are probably right, but still I can think of a lit of lame hacks that might work on different people. Mostly it was just a funny thought.

  118. This explains the logs at SEC... by switcha · · Score: 1

    This explains why the guys at the SEC "sting" operation were wondering why the signup logs for their phoney investment websites were filled in with names like "Bubbles", "Chippy", and "Bannana Breath."

    --
    You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
  119. Remember the Cocaine monkey? by Insightfill · · Score: 1
    Reminds me of that poor monkey in the anti-drug commercial who "turned down food, water, even sex, until he died" just for that cocaine hit he would get when he hit the lever in his cage.

    Except now, the monkey just has to think about hitting the left-mouse button and he gets that new addiction we all have.

    Poor Monkey...

  120. long way to go for that monkey by BrentRJones · · Score: 1

    There is a long way to go to get to where the monkey can use WordPerfect function keys.

    --
    Help end the use of Sigs. Tomorrow
  121. Oh Great by schmink182 · · Score: 1

    "[The monkey] became quite reluctant to move his arm to the reach command once the cursor was introduced into the game"

    So now they're training monkeys to be lazy. We've already doomed our own existance through convenience, we don't have to take the monkeys down with us

    1. Re:Oh Great by prnz · · Score: 1

      So now they're training monkeys to be lazy. We've already doomed our own existance through convenience, we don't have to take the monkeys down with us

      Don't worry. There will always be a group of die-hard monkeys that refuse to give up the command line.

      Paul

  122. Not going to happen for a long time by arn@lesto · · Score: 1

    The biggest problem that still needs to be solved is the implants that pick up signals
    cause the surrounding tissue to degrade and become useless after about 6 months.
    Spend the time to learn how to use it, then it stops working.
    However once they sort this out - sign me up.

    --
    - AndrewN
  123. This has already been done with people. by nesneros · · Score: 1

    One of the wonderful things about being part of the scientific community is seeing how stories get recycled and rehashed by major news outlets. Similar work has already been done with people:

    --
    Some men spend their entire lives trying to kill themselves for having been born. --Ross MacDonald
  124. Would this really help... by teslatug · · Score: 0

    ...those who are paralyzed? How can they figure out what a person is thinking of doing if he has never (or not in a long time) performed the task? Would the brain patterns be similar enough between all humans to allow for accurate readings without mapping the brain of every person? and more importantly, has that monkey been able to shock or punch the annoying ad monkey?

  125. Ah, the life of a lab animal by loosenut · · Score: 2

    What an honor, to be the first monkey to move a mouse with your mind. Not only that, but all the lady monkey's really like your new high-tech hat.

    (Did anybody else wonder why there were no pictures in the article?)

    SCIENCE!

  126. Does this mean... by CrazyBrett · · Score: 2

    Does this mean that banner ads will now start urging us to "Think Here!!!!"

  127. You can buy this off the shelf today by steved · · Score: 2, Informative

    Take a look at the Cyberlink You wear a headband and control the mouse by thinking. Sounds like the same thing.

  128. what about... by chronos2266 · · Score: 1

    force feedback :) That'd give you quite a headache.

  129. i can see it now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    one thought buying...

  130. Since i haven't seen the post yet.... by psyco484 · · Score: 1

    "imagine a beowulf cluster of these things"...... hopefully no one is dense enough to think I'm serious...

  131. One step closer.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To a Cyberpunk world.

    Now, if we could only develop and legalize ICE.

    I wanna fry me some skript kiddies! :)

  132. Re:FIREFOX LIVES - What about Macross +? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't any of you see Macross Plus?! The scene where the normal pilot ends up saving the thought controlled pilot because of a system shutdown, then, because of harbored feelings, 'Thinks' about altering his flight control surfaces, thereby causing the other pilot to crash. Oops! It happened... time for an investigation.

  133. Done on Humans in March 1998 by TornSheetMetal · · Score: 2, Informative

    Philip Kennedy did something similar in 1998 with humans. I witnessed an operation where he implanted an electrode in a monkey over 10 years ago. He also received a 1999 Discover Technical Innovation Award for the same work. Check out: http://www.emory.edu/WHSC/HSNEWS/releases/feb99/02 2399brain.html

    1. Re:Done on Humans in March 1998 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well you gotta give /. a lot of leeway here, 90% of the readers/posters and 100% of the editors were still in diapers in the early 90's...

  134. I'd prefer it for Tekken by FredBaxter · · Score: 0

    I don't know about you, but pulling off those ten move combos is such a pain. It would be really nice to just THINK a double backflip kick combo, especially for those of us who get our asses handed to us with disturbing regularity... Would be a different game tho.

  135. oh great by GutterBunny · · Score: 2

    Now software engineers will get even less exercise.

    --
    managers...why god invented purgatory
  136. does this mean... by davmct · · Score: 1

    that with enough monkeys at enough terminals, that they could think up Linux?

  137. You mean... by jmv · · Score: 2, Funny

    technology that allowed a monkey to control a mouse

    You mean even G.W. Bush will be able to use a computer...

  138. Re:Conspiracy theorists! Get your tinfoil hats rea by mother_superius · · Score: 1

    If they could read my mind, the computer would be the last thing I would be worried about.

  139. hey, look ma, i'm wireless!!! by augros · · Score: 1

    heh, that'll beat scaring people by moving their cursor via pc-connection! but you could really mess up your system when you sneeze.

    and on a side note, i'm kinda annoyed by the term "wireless devices." i mean, i've used wireless devices my whole life: forks, shoelaces, screwdrivers . . . the philosopher in me has trouble naming things in terms of what they're not.

  140. Sweet by devphil · · Score: 2
    The real nifty applications will come when this neuronal interfacing technology will be used to bypass deficient nerve links (spine damage) or to supplement/replace deficient muscle (muscular dystrophy and a ton of other debilitating illnesses).

    And then Stephen Hawking will really be able to get some work done, instead of having to use the crappy computer interface he's currently restricted to.

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
  141. It is by will alone I set my mouse in motion by jechoe · · Score: 1

    It would be sooooo cool to have something like this. Now if I could just get my keyboard hooked up too.

    Resistance is Futile!

    --
    Push the envelope. Watch it bend.
    1. Re:It is by will alone I set my mouse in motion by nil_null · · Score: 0

      Yeah, as a RSI sufferer I say forget voice recognition, I want to go directly from the brain!

  142. Back-seat coders by Blue+Lozenge · · Score: 1
    So the guy watching over my shoulder as I code suggests I rewrite that last printf() statement... Before I can do anything about it, the screen reads:

    printf("GET THE HELL OUT OF MY CUBE!\n");
  143. More poor reporting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    This technology has been around a looong time:


    http://www.ibva.com/


    Why don't these reports people ever check sources or history?


    Just lazy press release recyclers : )

  144. After moving the cursor... by rootmonkey · · Score: 1

    the monkey typed in "Pray for Mojo."

    --

    Yes but every time I try to see it your way, I get a headache.
  145. One thought shopping! by FortKnox · · Score: 2

    I'm more worried about amazon...

    They'll have a heyday with "One Thought Shopping!"

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    1. Re:One thought shopping! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. And I bet the sods will patent it too!

    2. Re:One thought shopping! by RDskutter · · Score: 1
      Hmmm, I _think_ I might buy that book, lets have a look at the price

      Doh! Too late!

  146. Hard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well at first I thought that it would be hard, because you generally think of a word instead of the letters it's composed of.
    But then again, as I'm writing this, I'm not consciously translating every word into its component letters... it just happens.
    You'd just need to learn how to type on that mental keyboard :)

  147. Hands Free! by M3wThr33 · · Score: 1

    Great! Now people can masturbate with both hands at once, but still load the images.

  148. As if by gila_monster · · Score: 1

    Oh, as if the Internet doesn't already look like it's populated exclusively by websurfing monkeys. :)

    --
    Ad luna, Alicia! Ad luna!
  149. Never mind controlling a pointer... by BlackGriffen · · Score: 1

    Did the monkey's Quake performance improve?

    BlackGriffen

  150. But that's OK! by Greyfox · · Score: 2

    I'm sure that after they're done with the experimentation they have to remove the monkey brain and examine it for debilitating side effects. So the monkey doesn't have to live life with a hi-tech hat after all!

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  151. Time Saver... by Moonshadow · · Score: 2

    Now, I want a combo neural keyboard and mouse. I'll be the faster coder on Earth, and graphic work will be a breeze! Not to mention, when it's time for a little UT break, I'll be dead accurate!

    When this is sufficiently fine tuned and is possible for humans to use safely, I'm gonna have a heyday.

  152. The hell with a mouse or robot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want one of these puppies in my head tied to a remote control for my TV! Imagine... being able to change the channel without having to reach for the remote, keeping both hands free for beer and pizza.

  153. IIRC Wiiliam Gibson... by theolein · · Score: 0

    has a claim to fame here with his cyberspace cowboys "jacking" into "decks" by placing so called "trodes" on their heads. Vis. Neuromancer 1983.

  154. New research field for AI? by hklingon · · Score: 2, Interesting



    Bare with me for just a moment - Anyone read the Quantum Leap books? Beckett used a part of his own brain to help create Ziggy.. to help bridge the gap between sheer computation and human reasoning.. .

    That and this article provoke an interesting thought - can this sort of technology be used to prematurely enable "artificial" intelligence in computers? Think about it: an advanced, organic brain being fed information from digital sources, and those sources of information reacting to the thoughts of the brain. It could enable a monkey to have very advanced visual and auditory inputs... would human-like intelligence come about? This is another form of the question chimpanzee researchers have been asking for ages: What if chimps had the physical ability for something as advanced as vocal speech?

    Wendell

  155. Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does that mean I will have to be mentally active while using the computer?? :P

  156. NOT 'Discovered'! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'Discovered' means it already existed, and they found it.

    'Invented' means they made it for the first time.

    I think it would be pretty big news indeed if this was a 'discovery', rather than an 'invention'.

  157. Think rm -rf / by segmond · · Score: 2

    Uh oh!

    --
    ------ Curiosity killed the cat. {satisfaction brought it back | it didn't die ignorant | lack of it is killing mankind
    1. Re:Think rm -rf / by achurch · · Score: 2

      No, don't think rm -rf / . . . oh shit, excuse me while I kill -9 -1 real qui

  158. Two questions: by glwtta · · Score: 2
    How many holes do I need to drill in my skull? and
    Where do I sign up?

    On second thought, forget the first question.

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  159. Think of the possiblites by EmPablo · · Score: 1

    So if they can get signals from the brain... maybe they can send them back too... That would make for some pretty realilistic force feedback for games... Or say your were playing Rouge Spear and hate waiting while your dead, now the game can just put you unconcious...

    1. Re:Think of the possiblites by Einsdot · · Score: 1

      HOw about killing someone remotely with only your mind? Live out the real meaning of "murder" - The unlawful killing of one human by another, especially with premeditated malice.

  160. Pre-scan for everyone by Einsdot · · Score: 1

    Is the electrical (brain) pattern different for each person? If it is, it would be hard to determine the pattern for someone who already lost it! So, pre-scan at birth for everyone...hmm...bad.

  161. should have read one paragraph further... by kesuki · · Score: 1

    ``In fact,'' she said, ``we found that he became quite reluctant to move his arm to the reach command once the cursor was introduced into the game. Apparently it was easier just to think about reaching.''
    Apparently they just hooked the brain into as a mouse cursor instead of the previous Touch sensitive screen the money had been using -- the monkey thought and the cursor moved faster than it could move its arm pretty simple.
    It does have me worried though if we're using systems like this on robotics there isn't any buffer like the spinal column to allow us to rethink an action prior to it acting out it would just happen. You think of strangling your abusive boss and the robotic arm does it before you have time to think not to. Perhaps we need to program the three laws of robotics into robotic arms before we put human minds in direct controll of them. Lest we find an army of quadriplegic terminators in our midst.

  162. Re:Conspiracy theorists! Get your tinfoil hats rea by brer_rabbit · · Score: 2

    and you can get your aluminum foil deflector beanie here! Don't forget to run the MindGuard software too. Someone obviously put lots of time and effort into it.

  163. Gee.... by ZoneGray · · Score: 2

    Geez, you know... I'm pretty sure I ran into that monkey on IRC the other day.

  164. Re:Why Slashdot Sucks by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

    "LINUX is the choice that should be made - no matter what. "

    I have been moderated up for advocating Windows over Linux.

    You just have to provide good /POSITIVE/ feedback.

    Granted three days later those very comments got moderated back down. . . . :)

    You just have to throw buttloads of evidence at people, that and keep an open mind. Linux isn't the best for everything, hell, very FEW people here think that.

    Just like we don't all think that the x86 is the best for all computing tasks for the the GeForce(number goes here) is the best video card ever made for any and all tasks.

    That is just plain stupid. It is like saying DVDs are perfect for all your video needs. Sure they are nice, but VHS is still mighty useful for making quick recordings of something, especially when such recordings only need to be around temporarily.

    Most people here do not object to Windows itself, they just object to how it is marketed.

    After the marketing objections came about then people started to pick at other parts of Windows. Hell Linux could be picked apart in the same matter, NO OS is perfect.

    "'News for nerds' - well being that nerd is a rather broad topic these days, slashdot's editors have
    opened the content engine up from interesting and cutting edge articles to crap such as 'AOL vs. Trillian' a topic
    that has been beaten to death by many other crappy articles about AOL blocking access to their network resources"

    Considering that I do not read those 'other sites' I rely on /. for news of what AOL's latest stunt is.

    It matters to me, it is news to me. News, matters, works for me.

    "Now...more onto the user base which constantly feels the need to post inane comments that have more to do
    about inner crying because the world is not working the way they want it to. "But this is crap...why is AOL doing
    this - is this legal?" Good input jack off. "

    Called commiserating.

    "Read the rest of this comment... [goatse.cx] "

    Congrats on yet another goatse link. Like anybody gives a flying fuck. Next time post a link to something original.

    Oh yah and post a troll that ain't just a rehash of other ones, m'kay? Really now, we have all seen this troll in various parts quite a few times now. I can damn nearly shit the responses to it out of my ass.

    Next time don't just post a shuffeling of an old Troll. If your going to do something, do it right damnit. . . . ::rolls eyes::

  165. Even Further Reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Daniella is a graduate student in Richard Andersen's lab at CalTech. I don't know why the article came out now, given that the Society for Neuroscience convention was back in November.

    What they are doing is indeed very cool, and yes they are not the only ones doing it (I know of about 5 academic groups with similar programs, including one at MIT which allows a monkey to control a robotic arm over the internet. One reason some studies use EEG (scalp) electrodes instead of implanted electrodes is that there are obvious restrictions on what you are allowed to do to a human. For the record, it is common to use some forms of invasive techniques on severly epileptic patients.

  166. Older technology that did about the same thing by WeaselGod · · Score: 1

    A couple years ago there was a company that sold what amounted to a thimble with a ps2 connection. You put the thimble on and it read your alpha and beta waves and after a couple hours calibration allowed you to flawlessly control the mouse mearly by thinking. I can't for the life of me remember what it was called but damn did I want one to play WarCraft II with (not that I needed any more of an advantage mind you). Unfortunately it cost about $250 at the time and I wasn't old enough to be working to afford such a toy. Anyway, controlling a mouse cursor by thought isn't anything new, just the ways in which we do it.

    Now its just a matter of time before i get my data jack a la Shadowrun.

    --
    - WeaselGod
    Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet turbines
  167. One-Thought-Shopping? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shit, just find a preppy motherfucking spoiled rich girl and put her in a shopping mall
    and there you have "One Thought Shopping"

  168. Great we can play .... by Mabidex · · Score: 0

    Alright...

    Now I can play FPS against my dog... and feel like I have actually kicked ass...

    I just hope HE doesnt beat me!

    Mabidex

    In law nothing is certain, but the expense. - S. Butler

  169. I would rather see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...a mouse control a monkey. Or better yet, a yorky control a rhino...no, wait...how about a pigeon controlling a sea slug? Or an ant controlling a bison? Butterfly controlling a big-mouthed bass? Praying mantis controlling a vulture? Housecat and gorilla? Hamster and woodpecker? Earthworm and orca?

  170. Oh great.... by smashdot · · Score: 1

    After having my ass kicked multiple times on Battle.net by Koreans, soon rhesus monkeys will be kicking my ass, too. I wonder how "For great justice!" sounds in monkey, anyway?

    --
    "C" is for cookie, that's good enough for me.
  171. ThinkGeek by pagercam2 · · Score: 1

    I can see the new T-Shirt from ThinkGeek.com now, replace the old:

    Go away or I will replace you with a very small shell script.

    will now read:

    Go away of I will replace you with a small monkey with a telepathic mouse.

    Get yours now before their all gone!!!!!

    ----
    "Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy" - Ben Franklin

  172. always mount a scratch monkey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am amazed none of you youngsters recalled this story:
    http://www.mv.com/ipusers/arcade/monkey.htm

  173. Prior Art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought Steve Case had implemented a monkey-computer interface years ago.

  174. already done in 1991 by d3l3t3_m3 · · Score: 1

    please search Peter Fromherz

  175. Mind Switch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out the no wires version ..
    http://www.phys.uts.edu.au/research/ht-mind-swit ch .html

  176. high-tech MRI by Mac+Beckett · · Score: 1

    ...as opposed to low-tech MRI, in which I hold a magnet to my head and Gladys runs around me very fast, snapping Polaroids.

  177. You know the real tragedy... by FredBaxter · · Score: 0

    ...this could be the end for everyone's favorite game (http://gamespot.com/gamespot/stories/reviews/0,10 867,2699724,00.html). -- A sig a day keeps the IT guys away

  178. Shadowrun! by lifebouy · · Score: 1

    Now we can all be Riggers. Just hop into your car and think about turning it on. Vroom baby!
    And my bumper sticker will say, "Don't even think about getting in my lane!"
    To Steve Jackson Games: Make backups now because they'll be coming again as soon as they hear about this.

    --
    Drop me a line at:
    Key ID: 0x54D1D809
  179. trying not to think by syrupdude · · Score: 1
    Here's an interesting problem. How do make yourself not think about something you don't want to think about? Imagine having the following conversation with yourself:

    "Okay, I just finished that paper. Now I've got to be real careful with it. Just don't think about that rm * command. Don't even think about it. You've worked really hard on this thing, so if you think rm * then all your work is gone."

    "Dammit."

  180. Geez this technology is a little dated. by DRACO- · · Score: 1

    Gez this technology is a little dated.. I remember back in high school having discussions in Pshycology-AP (1997) about this activity with paralized humans. They simply cut into the brain, grew the ends of a neron into a short tube with an electrode at the end. The user then had to be taught to try to move the pointer.

    They didnt get too much out of it. Simply got movement. No real control was achived as of that time.

    I guess this is newsworthy as it is now a chimp controling the mouse pointer. I wonder when Microsoft is going to hire the chimp to redesign their next OS user interface, call it Windows CHIMP. DRACO-

    --
    Consider yourself blessed if you are sneezed on by a dragon and only get wet, it could have been a fireball.
  181. We missed this? by satanami69 · · Score: 1
    ''locked-in'' patients ``operate external devices such as a robot arm, or a computer to surf the Internet,''

    Seriously, how is this quote not already on /. marked at +5 Funny?

    --
    I really hate Dan Patrick.
  182. New Syndromes by evilviper · · Score: 2

    Now people with Lou Gehrig's Disease may also be in danger of catching "CmdrTaco's Disease".

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  183. Patent by iocc · · Score: 1

    I should patent "think and click" before amazon does it.

  184. Already in Humans.... by ChristopherAltman · · Score: 1



    This research has already been applied in humans by Dr. Phil Kennedy at Georgia Tech, who has been developing the work for years...

    Christopher Altman
    Graduate Researcher in Artificial Intelligence
    http://www.umsl.edu/~altmanc/

    --
    Quantum computing / Artificial intelligence: http://www.umsl.edu/~altmanc/news.html
  185. Working with Monkeys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The monkeys in my department will welcome this! Saves all the effort expended pointlessly bashing the keyboard, now they can pointlessly mouse around without effort!

  186. Banner Ads by irrelevant · · Score: 1

    Punch the human and win 20 bananas...

  187. Quick! by irrelevant · · Score: 1

    Buy more AOL stock!