Slashdot Mirror


Bell Canada Turns Payphones into Public Hotspots

turing0 writes "Bell Canada yesterday announced a trial of a new public wifi hotspot service - currently free - with locations in either airports, railway stations or bus terminals in Toronto, Ottawa, Montreal and Kingston. Bell has adopted an interesting twist on the hotspot in that they have built a steel armored case, in which to house the AP, a DSL modem and power supply, which is the exact dimensions of a payphone -- and mounted the whole thing in place of a single phone where there are banks of them such as you see in airports and bus terminals or subways. According to this article in the Globe and Mail Bell has still not determined the pricing model." turing0 continues: "I attended the press conference at Toronto's Union Station, Track F, where I took a close look at the AP box which was mounted quite securely to a bank of payphones, and I was pretty impressed at how solid it appeared as various journalistic hacks took turns trying to pry the AP off the wall under the watch of Bell execs and a Bell phone tech. Bell is using Cisco AP1200's in the box as well as Alcatel ADSL modems with a 3Mb/Sec ADSL/ATM backhaul to the internet according to the Bell tech present. Various Bell types were wandering about with a pretty diverse collection of hardware such as Apple iBooks, Compaq PDA and IBM Thinkpads with 802.11 cards from Proxim, Cisco and Symbol as well as Dlink and SMC. Great use of a fully amortized asset (phone banks) and a very interesting spin on how to generate new revenue from a dying cost center - the payphone biz. Plus the added benefit of not having to negotiate new agreements with property management and landlords. Smooth move for Bell. Why didn't I think of that? Payphones, though declining in numbers, are still pretty much ubiquitous and are served with power as well as a good solid mounting location for the AP. In the final deployment Bell said that they would also be mounting AP's in the plenum and riser infrastructure of selected buildings should the full roll-out of the Accesszone product proceed. Is Bell Canada the first ILEC to recycle payphones?"

253 comments

  1. How much coverage? by dirvish · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is there any info on the dispersement of pay phones? Will this blanket major cities?

  2. Good Idea by blackmonday · · Score: 5, Funny

    Guess they gotta do something with those pay phones now that everyone has a cell phone.

    1. Re:Good Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how the heck can (pun intended) the terrorist can make an anonymous phone call these days.

    2. Re:Good Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Interestingly, in theory, the payphones at Toronto's Pearson airport have been free to the general public for some time now, because of "poor cellphone coverage". Apparently, there was a bit of a trade dispute between the airport authority and the cellphone providers. Both sides blame each other, but the deal seems to be that cellphone providers wanted to pay less to be able to put up cells on airport property (while the airport presumably jacked up their prices, to "tax" the cellphone providers.) As a result, at least back in August, the GTAA (Greater Toronto Airport Authority) was providing free local phonecalls from the Bell payphones.

      Amusingly, this supposedly "poor cellphone coverage" thing seems to be a myth. When I was flying out of Pearson in mid-August, my reception was just fine. I was able to carry on conversations and check my email without losing my signal.

    3. Re:Good Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, at least two of the four (three for all intesnts and purposes - Bell and Telus share their networks) major Canadian cell carriers have cell towers on buildings adjacent to the airport now.

    4. Re:Good Idea by arubis · · Score: 1

      Like make the payphones into, say, mini cell towers? Lord knows there's still plenty of places you can run into a crappy signal.

  3. WiFi Ahoy! by explosionhead · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The problem with all of these WiFi units is that as has been highlighted in previous articles, nobody is entirely sure how to make a profit out of them. As far as I'm concerned, things like Starbucks pay service are a bit too pricey for the casual user, who is generally relying on kind soles to open up APs for free

    Oh well, guess we can just hope the leave them free :)

    --
    ?
    1. Re:WiFi Ahoy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone get a pringles can, I'm less that 10 clicks from Pearson International Airport.
      WhooHoo, free internet here I come!

    2. Re:WiFi Ahoy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      kind soles to open up APs for free

      Kind soles? How would kicking them open make them free, unless you are planning on taking them home with you?

    3. Re:WiFi Ahoy! by pauljlucas · · Score: 3, Interesting
      ... nobody is entirely sure how to make a profit out of them.
      That's because there is no way to make a profit out of them. Most people, myself included, are just to cheap to pay per-minute/hour charges for nonessential communication. Most people simply don't need to get access to either the web or their e-mail now: it can wait until they get home/work.

      The only people who would even be likely to pay are business customers on travel, but, even then, it's not a big market.

      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
    4. Re:WiFi Ahoy! by MacroRex · · Score: 1

      That's because there is no way to make a profit out of them. Most people, myself included, are just to cheap to pay per-minute/hour charges for nonessential communication.

      Well, I don't know about that, especially if they don't price it too high (which they probably will, but...). Say they use a scheme where you can get a password to a certain hot spot by sending the company a text message with their cell phone, containing the code for the hot spot. Sending this message would cost you a few dollars, and in return you would receive a code you can use to connect to the hotspot, that is valid for, say, 30 minutes. I know I'd gladly pay a couple of bucks to check my email or just plain surf if I got spare time at that location and have my laptop with me.

      I don't know if the text message approach in the US, but here in northern Europe virtually everyone has a cell phone, and indeed the telcos here help companies to set up services which rely on text messages.

  4. Implications by Lu+Xun · · Score: 5, Funny

    Of course, anyone wishing to use these hotspots will have to persuade the clueless moron inside, trying to call home and wondering why his quarter won't fit anywhere, to come out.

    --
    That's not a soda... it's a caffeine delivery device!
    1. Re:Implications by los+furtive · · Score: 1

      In Canada the phone 'booth' has all but died. All of these phones are open air against a wall, some of the more modern pay pohones sit on a table in the lounge and only take cards, not change.

      --

      I'm a writer, a poet, a genius, I know it. I don't buy software, I grow it.

    2. Re:Implications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      "some of the more modern pay pohones sit on a table in the lounge and only take cards, not change."

      I'm confused now. Are you talking about prostitues?

  5. Wow! by TerryAtWork · · Score: 4, Funny

    We've /.'d Bell!

    --
    It's Christmas everyday with BitTorrent.
    1. Re:Wow! by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      Nah it just looks like it was a bogus link. The official login for this service is here. Note: Please do not mod me up people as I also linked this in another post.

    2. Re:Wow! by lth · · Score: 1

      Must've been a baby-bell! ;)

    3. Re:Wow! by nathanrdotcom · · Score: 1

      I never thought I'd see the day...

  6. Re:Congrats on a Great Idea . . . . at least origi by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Informative

    2 is charge out the ass to use them

    They (Bell Canada) already have those little cubbie-holes with ethernet jacks at airports, etc, so execs can plug in and surf the net through a really limited proxy. It was like 20 bucks for a half hour last time I saw 'em at Pearson Airpot.

    Y'all keep dreaming of your free broadband.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  7. Note to self... Check eBay.ca later today by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 5, Funny

    It'd be kinda fun to offer my kids their own phone line, but install a pay phone to cover the cost.
    --

    1. Re:Note to self... Check eBay.ca later today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously missed that episode of the Brady Bunch! Let me summarize- 1. the brady family installs a payphone for the kids 2. good family fun aspires!

    2. Re:Note to self... Check eBay.ca later today by Mr_Dyqik · · Score: 2

      is this format going to replace the

      1) do something
      2) ?
      3) profit!

      cliche

      You obviously missed that episode of the Brady Bunch! Let me summarise-
      1) The Brady family invents a new /. cliche for the kids.
      2) Good family fun ensues!

    3. Re:Note to self... Check eBay.ca later today by Thud457 · · Score: 2, Funny
      That was a great episode!

      Bobby built a bluebox and haxored the phone for free calls!

      Then Greg stole all the credit.




      Interesting. Why does a alledged techno-visionary like 'Greg' not have a website to share his widsom with the masses?!!

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    4. Re:Note to self... Check eBay.ca later today by The-Perl-CD-Bookshel · · Score: 1

      They would just hack it and get free calls anyway "Pa Bell"

      --
      I don't keep a lid on my coffee so when I walk around I look busy -me
    5. Re:Note to self... Check eBay.ca later today by dubiousmike · · Score: 2

      The Brady Bunch did this back in the 70's. According to precidence, your kids will be kidnapped by Vincent Price, locked up in the town jail of a ghost town and lost in the Grand Canyon.

      Never mind faking UFOs, saving the local park, battling with card building for greenstamps, launching their recording career and hanging with Davy Jones/Don Drysdale/Joe Nameth.

      I say go for it.

      :P

    6. Re:Note to self... Check eBay.ca later today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Interesting. Why does a alledged techno-visionary like 'Greg' not have a website to share his widsom with the masses?!!"

      Pheraps because it's *illegal*. Moron!

    7. Re:Note to self... Check eBay.ca later today by lethargic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I heard a story about a year ago of a guy that was charging people 25 cents to use his telephone because the payphone across the street was broken. Bell sued him for reselling his telephone service without an agreement. I can't find any references to this, and I don't know which carrier, but I think it was Bell Canada. It wouldn't surprise me if all/most carriers have some kind of terms regarding resale of your services.

      Just something to keep in mind.

  8. Location Suggestion by dfn5 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I wonder if I can get them to put a payphone with an AP in my living room.

    --
    -- Thou hast strayed far from the path of the Avatar.
    1. Re:Location Suggestion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why not just point a yagi antenna at the pay phone with WIFI enabled?

  9. Well, you would think... by GMontag · · Score: 2

    with locations in either airports, railway stations or bus terminals in Toronto, Ottawa, Montreal and Kingston

    Well, you would think that they could narrow down the locations better than that.

    Toronto? Okay, let's spread out and find where the APs are located here...

    1. Re:Well, you would think... by ergo98 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Check out this page listing the pilot locations on the right side. That's the official page for the service, as a sidenote.

    2. Re:Well, you would think... by MarkLR · · Score: 3, Informative

      From http://www.bce.ca/en/news/releases/bc/2002/12/10/6 9602.html.

      During the Bell AccessZone Wi-Fi pilot, users with 802.11b enabled devices will be able to gain free access to Bell's hotspot service in the
      following high traffic locations: Toronto's Union Station; Via Rail Panorama lounge in Montreal's Central Station and Toronto's Union Station; the departure area at Montreal's Dorval International Airport; Kingston's Confederation Park and Marina supported by the Kingston Economic Development Corporation; and Kingston's St. Lawrence College. AccessZone is also available in the Air Canada Maple Leaf lounges at Pearson International Airport (Terminal 2), Dorval International Airport, and the Calgary International
      Airport and will be installed in all other Maple Leaf Lounge locations. Toronto's Mount Sinai Hospital and Kingston's Frontenac Public Library will also be deploying a Bell AccessZone location in the coming weeks. Other pilot locations will be introduced over the pilot period, which is expected to run until the spring of 2003.

    3. Re:Well, you would think... by dropshadows · · Score: 1

      Found at: Bell AccessZone
      Pilot locations
      You can find AccessZone pilot sites at the following convenient locations across Canada. Visit this page regularly for updates as we add more hotspot sites.

      Toronto: Union Station Panorama Lounge, Union Station Air Canada Maple Leaf Lounge, Pearson International Airport, Terminal 2

      Kingston: Confederation Park and Marina St. Lawrence College Yea Kingston!!

      Montreal: Panorama Lounge, Central Station Dorval Airport, Departures Area Air Canada Maple Leaf Lounge, Dorval Airport

      Calgary: Air Canada Maple Leaf Lounge, Calgary International Airport

    4. Re:Well, you would think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I decided to walk across the street and scout around Union Station during lunch. I walked around and found 2 access points, One just outside Harvey's and the second down the Via Train ticket corridor.

    5. Re:Well, you would think... by duncf · · Score: 1

      Toronto's Mount Sinai Hospital and Kingston's Frontenac Public Library will also be deploying a Bell AccessZone location in the coming weeks.

      They don't let you use cell phones in hospitals, but they'll let Bell put in a wireless access point in?

      Is this safe?

    6. Re:Well, you would think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Kingston and was excited by this news.

      So I walked over to Confederation Park and Marina (only a few blocks from where I live) with my notebook and 802.11b card.

      Nothing. No signal. No visible boxes at any of the three clusters of payphones around the park.

      What's up? Does this pilot exist outside Toronto?

  10. What about phreaks? by Burritos · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Is there any chance some phreakers could mess this up?

    1. Re:What about phreaks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AIRSNORT

    2. Re:What about phreaks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What phreaks? You mean like dwarves getting thrown in a wall, bearded women, Japs eating their own shit? Sure, I would like to see them messing up the phones!

    3. Re:What about phreaks? by Icephreak1 · · Score: 1

      Always possible, my friend.

      - IP

      Toronto, Canada

  11. wifi = Great by pr0c · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sounds like this is a good solution. Why can't electric companies take advantage of this with their electric poles? They can run all their network stuff side by side with their electricity lines and then they could offer phone service / internet service via their network down areas that have nothign but poor dialup. And since they already have the job half done (poles / wiring up) it could be quite cost effective. They could even run the networking down the electric lines themselves, i saw on /. that being done in europe somewhere. Then they could just have some sort of converter to wifi from that.

    1. Re:wifi = Great by Drakin · · Score: 1

      Hmm.. around here, in the older part of town, the Hydro poles already have the cable and phone lines running on 'em anyway.

    2. Re:wifi = Great by BrookHarty · · Score: 2

      Actually Microsoft was doing a joint venture here in Seattle, where they used power poles, but I cant remember what the name of the product. Microsoft has too many wireless products to remember which one. (-;

    3. Re:wifi = Great by radish · · Score: 2

      There are no electric poles in my area :)

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    4. Re:wifi = Great by nathanrdotcom · · Score: 1

      You've got a good point there.

    5. Re:wifi = Great by pr0c · · Score: 1

      There may be no poles in lots of areas, but in the areas that need high speed internet are also the areas that would most likely have poles. As for the electric company having to pay more than the phone company... well of course they would! Cable companies do, no big deal.

  12. Tape Recorder Hacking by Nevermore-Spoon · · Score: 5, Funny

    remember the old taping the sounds a quarter makes when insterted in the coin slot and playing it back into the phone to get free longdistance?...wonder how long till someone makes a knoppix disk that boots up and gives free WiFi access

    --
    I have great faith in fools; My friends call it self-confidence. Edgar Allan Poe 1809-1845
    1. Re:Tape Recorder Hacking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh, the days of the redbox. It brings back so many memories of the good things that have come and gone in our past. Anyone else remember the blotto box? The entire list of boxes was just insane.

    2. Re:Tape Recorder Hacking by Burritos · · Score: 0

      No, I wasn't doing phreaking much in the days of the blotto box. However, I managed to find a large list of boxes, including a new one made by Captain Bizarro called the Executioner Box.
      http://www.artofhacking.com/boxrvidx.htm

    3. Re:Tape Recorder Hacking by ejaw5 · · Score: 2

      remember the old taping the sounds a quarter makes when insterted in the coin slot and playing it back into the phone to get free longdistance?

      Has this actually worked in the past? I'd like to know as this is the first I've ever heard of this.

      --

      $cat /dev/random > Sig
    4. Re:Tape Recorder Hacking by Nevermore-Spoon · · Score: 1

      Yes it did work back in the day, and according to the link above posted by Burritos, it still works on many machines today....

      --
      I have great faith in fools; My friends call it self-confidence. Edgar Allan Poe 1809-1845
    5. Re:Tape Recorder Hacking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It never actually worked other than in movies. People like Burritos posting lists of boxes are just kids showing their ignorance by trying to look smart.

    6. Re:Tape Recorder Hacking by Maxwell_E · · Score: 2

      Short answer yes. Long answer, read the old Phrack manuals. (Too lazy to look up a link, I think 2600 used to mirror all of that stuff.)

    7. Re:Tape Recorder Hacking by tomhudson · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes it did. Not only that, but there was an even easier way on lots pf payphones in the '70's. Just tap out the number by pushing the hang-up switch - in other words, pulse dial the number rather than tone dial. No coins, no red box, no nuthin. I was more than a bit surprised when someone showed me this.

    8. Re:Tape Recorder Hacking by nathanrdotcom · · Score: 1

      Yep. As I recall, it was 2600Hz (and that's where 2600 was thought of), at least at the start.

    9. Re:Tape Recorder Hacking by sharkey · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And getting the phone to ring back: 555 or 666 or 999 + the last four digits in the payphones number, hook-flash and listen for the "funny" dial-tone, hang up and walk off. The old ones would ring until answered. We found this to be great fun as kids.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    10. Re:Tape Recorder Hacking by yelligsc · · Score: 1

      I used to do that ALL THE TIME at in gradeschool. It drove people crazy.

      Ah.. technology was fun before they locked down all the cool hidden 'features'

      Scott.

    11. Re:Tape Recorder Hacking by Reece400 · · Score: 1

      it's pretty hard to get the numbers right tho... at least in the experience i had with my home phone, when i had to use a touch tone only phone, on my pulse dial only line...

      Reece,

    12. Re:Tape Recorder Hacking by unicron · · Score: 2

      Yeah, the old Captain Crunch whistle toys would blow a perfect 2600 tone.

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    13. Re:Tape Recorder Hacking by nathanrdotcom · · Score: 1

      I heard about those way back when but I never did have one :^)

  13. There's something.. by craenor · · Score: 5, Funny

    About using the words Canada and Hotspot in the same sentence that just seems wrong in so many ways...maybe it's just me, eh?

    1. Re:There's something.. by aron_wallaker · · Score: 2

      using the words Canada and Hotspot in the same sentence that just seems wrong in so many ways...

      Unless you add the word 'hockey'!

    2. Re:There's something.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or "beautiful girls"....

    3. Re:There's something.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...about using the words "ignorant" and "American" in the same sentence.

      Oh wait... that DOES work. Maybe it's just me, y'all.

    4. Re:There's something.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arrogant fucking americans. At least we don't have planes falling on us all the time.

    5. Re:There's something.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd probably be surprised to learn that there are parts of the United States that are north of Toronto Canada!!!! WHAT?? yes its true retard look at a map.

  14. Re:Congrats on a Great Idea . . . . at least origi by TerryAtWork · · Score: 2

    Broadband will never be free, but it'll get cheaper and cheaper....

    --
    It's Christmas everyday with BitTorrent.
  15. Terrorists. by FreeLinux · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, there you have it. It's always been suspected that the Canadians were terrorists but, this proves it. Only last week was the US Justice Department talking about the criminality of open access points and now Canada does this.

    Karma: Excellent -- Well, we'll just see about that!

    1. Re:Terrorists. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would this be a troll? The friggin recent article on covered on Slashdot tied APs and Terrorism together! Of course, under the beloved Homeland's games rules, a cottonball could be tied to terrorism.

    2. Re:Terrorists. by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      Yes, but so long as they keep the beer, hockey players and Red Green flowing, we'll just turn a blind eye :)

  16. How do you take payments on this? by mhesseltine · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ok, I understand how, with a "Public Internet Terminal" like those cheesy ads on DirecTV, you get paid by people putting in money or swiping a credit card. How does this work with a wireless access point? Your card is going to pick up a signal. You may not want to key your credit card info over the airwaves to this unknown box. Do you walk up to the box, swipe your card, then key in the MAC address of your wireless card?

    Basically, what's phase 2 where

    1. Install public 802.11 access point
    2. ???
    3. Profit.
    --
    Overrated / Underrated : Moderation :: Anonymous Coward : Posting
    1. Re:How do you take payments on this? by pr0c · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't understand all the ins and outs of networking perfectly but it seams this would be simple..

      1.) You enter the "hot spot"
      2.) The terminal picks up your network card and gets the mac address
      3.) If your network card is set on DHCP then no matter what URL you bring up it redirects you to a payment gateway
      4.) after you pay you get to go anywhere :)

      Sounds too easy to me, perhaps this isn't possible hehe..

    2. Re:How do you take payments on this? by HeghmoH · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't know how they actually do it, but one easy scheme comes to mind. The network is kept open, but unidentified users are blocked. Any port 80 requests are redirected to their authentication server which asks for your username and password. It also has a signup page where you can give your credit card number and get a username instantly. Once you authenticate, outbound connection are allowed, and you're good to go. If you're afraid of putting in your credit card over a wireless connection, well, one hopes they'd use https, and if you don't trust that, then you should probably just keep all your money in your mattress anyway.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    3. Re:How do you take payments on this? by mrseigen · · Score: 1

      Accountability is also a big deal here; public anonymous wi-fi hotspots leave enormous potential for abuse (possibly more than the pay phones next to them?).

      It is a pretty cool idea, though. If we had pay WiFi spots at a decent price, I might be able to justify an iPaq or Zaurus with wireless.

    4. Re:How do you take payments on this? by Lerxst+Pratt · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Keeping in mind that I cannot get to the article...

      I'm under the impression that you don't have to swipe anything. Being a WiFi point, you'd just have to be within 90 yards of the booth (or something like that) and have instant WiFi access served via DHCP I suppose.

      This brings up a couple even more intriguing questions: When going to a fee-based service, how do you filter out paying customers from non-paying customers? Would the customer be registered with Bell with their particular MAC addresses? Would Bell charge by the minute? Would the bill just appear at home with your regular phone bill?

    5. Re:How do you take payments on this? by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2

      Step 2: Buy up land surrounding wireless access point and rent it to shops (and maybe the occasional business that doesn't want to build its own network infrastructure).

      But that requires too much investment and probably isn't a good use of capital, unless you wanted to get into the land business anyway.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    6. Re:How do you take payments on this? by wowbagger · · Score: 5, Informative

      Easy:

      1) Your laptop/PDA/whatever requests an IP address via DHCP.
      2) Access point hands out IP address, makes a note against that IP address that "has not paid yet"
      3) At this point, all that you can do is access HTTP and DNS.
      4) You point your browser at any web site - let's say http://slashdot.org for grins.
      5) DNS succeeds.
      6) Your computer does an HTTP GET.
      7) Access device sees you've not paid yet. Sends HTTP REDIRECT to https://fork.it.over.to.me
      8) Your laptop looks that up. Gets an IP address.
      9) Your laptop requests page.
      10) Page comes up - input credit card here.
      11) You do so. Access device marks you has "paid for 1 Hour". Ports open up.
      12) You again try /., and it goes through.

    7. Re:How do you take payments on this? by swb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hmm.

      1) Hijack access point
      2) Fake service payment screens via same intercept tech
      3) Profit, illegally

    8. Re:How do you take payments on this? by eli173 · · Score: 1

      Basically, what's phase 2 where

      Install public 802.11 access point
      ???
      Profit.


      What if you swipe your card and paid $x for 15 minute blocks of use... and during that time anyone/everyone can use it?
      It might have some interesting social consequences...
      "Internet access is on me!" "Yay!"
      "Anyone else want to split the cost of some 'net time?" "I'll buy 30 minutes if you will."

      Those who don't want to pay can wait for others to do so. Those who need access can buy it. Those who don't want to pay get 25% of a download and time runs out... they now have some incentive to pay that they didn't have before...

      Hmm...

      eli
    9. Re:How do you take payments on this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorta like the evil public/anonymous pay phones they are replacing. Oh and don't get me started on those Public/Anonymous mailboxes. Only Terrorists use such things.

    10. Re:How do you take payments on this? by mhesseltine · · Score: 2

      Ok, replying to my own post, but it seems the easiest way to cover what many people above have said (HTTPS, port 80). What keeps you from getting an IP, establishing a (SSH/other favorite non-web protocol) connection, and using this connection without paying?

      --
      Overrated / Underrated : Moderation :: Anonymous Coward : Posting
    11. Re:How do you take payments on this? by ptomblin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't even need to hijack the existing one, just set up your own access point. Some people are likely to connect to it thinking it's the Bell one. Then even though your credit card payment screens look remarkably like Bell's, you're really selling them a service (wireless access through your own DSL or cable modem) and are probably getting closer to being legal.

      --
      The next Cmdr Taco duplicate will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
    12. Re:How do you take payments on this? by Tony.Tang · · Score: 2

      This is kind of fascinating. It brings into play all sorts of bad hacks where a malicious party could quite easily get your credit card and do nasty things. It may not be clear "which" access device is handing you the IP address--thus, instead of getting sent to http://fork.it.over.to.me, you could be sent to http://evil.doers.website.

      I wonder how they'd get around this problem. hehe... Trust is a hard thing to deal with in a wireless world.

    13. Re:How do you take payments on this? by the_machine · · Score: 1

      Sure, that is easy. And it will work for the first paying customer. Then, all the next guy has to do is sniff his IP address, reconfig my card, and I'm a paying customer too! :)

    14. Re:How do you take payments on this? by CorprateSlave · · Score: 1

      The Royal York Hotel, right across the street from Union Station, where the press conference was held, has been doing this for a while. Whenever I was in downtown Toronto and had some time to kill, I would hang out in the lobby of the Royal York, surfing the net on my iBook. mmm... comfy chairs...

    15. Re:How do you take payments on this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OR better yet, you buy time on access cards that are similar to those for long distance service. Put up a vending machine that sells cards, order or renew them them online, or have them charge an account with the phone company. That way, you only pay for the time you use.

      Individual users can pay as they go and businesses can get a flat rate, while writing it off as an expense.

    16. Re:How do you take payments on this? by eg0n · · Score: 1

      very good idea man. a nice way to encourage cooperation.

      --
      i just climb trees, and look for rhythm everywhere.
    17. Re:How do you take payments on this? by wowbagger · · Score: 2

      Not quite - do remember, your card would have to have the same MAC as his, or the AP could drop your packets.

      And if you have the same MAC, then you and he get the same packets, and neither of you can surf.

      Your scheme would only work to get his info after he's left, to use the remaining minutes he bought - sort of like parking in somebody's spot after they leave, but before the meter runs out.

      And as for the other poster's point about trust - that is why you make sure you use HTTPS, rather than HTTP. Then, the evil h@><0r would have to have a valid cert that the browser recognized - making it somewhat easier to track him down.

      The other way to make this work would be for sell advertising - ever N minutes you are forced to sit through an ad...

      <shudder>

    18. Re:How do you take payments on this? by glh · · Score: 2

      What scares me is not so much HOW they are going to get the payment, but what they are going to charge!! I'm guessing at least $1/minute like many rippoffish cell-phone companies did when they first released...

      I mean, what's to stop them? They don't exactly have a lot of competition, especially in an airport. So if you're going to browse slashdot and check your email, you best write a fast script to hop on, download, and get off ASAP! (that alone might cost you a good $5 depending on how much email you have)

    19. Re:How do you take payments on this? by Fjord · · Score: 2

      This will be a little bit hard, since your won't have a bell certificate, but if you keep everything HTTP, I wonder how many people would notice they never got the "you are enteringa secure site" box (I know I would, but I'm super paranoid about giving my CC on the net, and will check that the lock is closed and the address bar is https).

      --
      -no broken link
    20. Re:How do you take payments on this? by dachshund · · Score: 1
      I've thought about this for a little while, and there are some issues.

      do remember, your card would have to have the same MAC as his, or the AP could drop your packets. And if you have the same MAC, then you and he get the same packets, and neither of you can surf.

      Setting the MAC address on many 802.11 cards is a snap. My Lucent card allows me to change it on the fly through their control panel. As to neither of you being allowed to surf, there are ways around that-- for one thing, you could simply install a different TCP/IP stack that isn't paralyzed by the confusion; your mark might find his own surfing disrupted, but he might not know it's you.

      I've considered that maybe the answer is not to trust MAC addresses or IP addresses, and to instead use an IPSEC tunnel from the client to the AP. That would afford better security and make it much harder for anyone to hijack your connection. 'Course that'd require some extra installation, but most OSes are starting to include IPSEC-- you'd just need a way to make configuration simple and automatic.

    21. Re:How do you take payments on this? by RollingThunder · · Score: 2

      Presumably, you would buy in advance on a prepaid card, with some type of account info.

      Gaining actual access to the network (or rather, outside the AP) would require some type of sign-in, that starts your billing.

    22. Re:How do you take payments on this? by nathanrdotcom · · Score: 1

      I would guess there would be some sort of debit/credit card machine built in...hmm, yes I can see the security issues. Probably just a regular debit/credit card machine, the kind you see in stores.

    23. Re:How do you take payments on this? by LinuxTek · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't know if this is the exact process, but Hotels with High Speed Internet Access do something very similar. I stayed at one of those hotels in Denver (a Holiday Inn, I think) and I tried the service. Basically what happens is that when you connect the laptop to the net, and try to access any webpage, they redirect you to a page with prices and they make you agree on the charge to your room. Every other port is closed until you go thru the page, btw.

      --
      Signatures are supposed to be funny?
    24. Re:How do you take payments on this? by anonymous+loser · · Score: 2

      Why don't you take a look at T-Mobile's Hotspots in many Starbucks. They make you sign up for an account with a credit card, although I imagine the phone company could just bill you like they do with your regular phone bill. I use this all the time as it can sometimes be difficult to find decent high-speed internet access when I am travelling.

  17. This might prove interesting by Burritos · · Score: 0

    http://www.payphone.com/Our_Products/Desktop_Payph ones/909.htm You can do it

    1. Re:This might prove interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
  18. Do existing agreements cover this? by Nonac · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Plus the added benefit of not having to negotiate new agreements with property management and landlords

    This assumes that their existing agreements allow them to conduct any sort of transaction on the covered property. If it limits them to phone service, they will have to renegotiate. I can't imagine many property managers would sign an agreement that lets them put anything they want in that spot.

    1. Re:Do existing agreements cover this? by PatientZero · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I would guess that the contracts allow Bell Canada to use the space for any "communications service." I seriously doubt they would have limited themselves by specifying just "phone service."

      I'm just glad that's one place I haven't seen pasted over with advertising.

      --
      Freedom to fear. Freedom from thought. Freedom to kill.
      I guess the War on Terror really is about freedom!
  19. But... by tomblackwell · · Score: 1

    If everyone had a cell phone with an appropriate modem for their device, there'd be no need for WiFi hostspots...

  20. Link by loconet · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here is a working link which talks about the service.

    Should be interesting competition for starbucks and the like who wanted to come to Toronto and setup hotspots.

    --
    [alk]
    1. Re:Link by stevey · · Score: 1

      Seems to me that if you're outside using a free access point you're gonna get cold - and would like nothing better than a nice starbucks coffee....

  21. That's called red boxing by Burritos · · Score: 0

    It still works in some remote areas..
    http://www.phonelosers.org/red_box.html.

  22. This is all well and good... by jhawkins · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Until some 'Consumer Protection' group such as the Center for Science in the Public Interest does some expose (looking at their home page, I see: "Death on the Half Shell", "America: Drowining in Sugar", "Liquid Candy Report", "Tax Junk Foods!").

    Someone will come out with some half-assed story that you can catch herpes from using these APs just like you can get the germs from the public phone handset. You will have to spray your laptop down with lysol before using, so you don't get viruses from the box that looks like a public phone.

    1. Re:This is all well and good... by los+furtive · · Score: 1

      Are you trying to make a point, or push an agenda? Get off the soap box and start living your life.

      --

      I'm a writer, a poet, a genius, I know it. I don't buy software, I grow it.

  23. US Gov declares Bell as a Terrorist organizazation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    In keeping with it's new policy of declaring free wireless access as a means of aiding terroists, the US government put Bell on it's list of terrorist organizations and warned all companies that they risk the same fate if they adopt free wireless access.
    The US military has sent a Delta force team into Bell HQ to take down the terrorist ring leader.

  24. Picture by loconet · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here is some more info on the hotspots, including a picture of it!

    --
    [alk]
  25. Sounds a bit like "Zone Phones" by redbaron7 · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    ZonePhones (and a couple of competing products) were around in the UK in the 1980s, about the same time as the first cellphones came out with which they competed. Receiving stations were positioned in various public places - airports, stations, motorway service stations, etc. Or that was the idea. Can't remember the exact coverage maybe 100m radius - definitely not much more, probably less. So a bit like a cross between a cellphone and one of those wireless telephones you can buy for your home. Their advantage over the "brick" cellphones of the day, were their size - more like modern cellphones. But "brick" cellphones had the advantage of large areas of coverage, whilst zonephones were limited to a few hotspots here and there.

    Needless to say the scheme was a spectacular failure. Last time I looked at Greenweld they had some of the base station parts available as surplus.

    RB

    1. Re:Sounds a bit like "Zone Phones" by KjetilK · · Score: 2

      Obviously, these hotspots are going to be more or less obsolete when UMTS is up and running, but I think that if they can get it up and running fast, it is a nice idea, and good for the transitional period.

      --
      Employee of Inrupt, Project Release Manager and Community Manager for Solid
  26. Re:Congrats on a Great Idea . . . . at least origi by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Informative

    Thats what people thought *before* the .com bust.

    I see the price getting higher and higher for less and less service.

    Comcast used to offer 2M down, 768k up as its regular service. Now the regular service is 1.5/128, and the aforementioned is the 'Pro' service, at a lofty premium.

    Bell Canada, IIRC, now has monthly bandwidth limits on their once 'unlimited' DSL services, and charge by the byte once they're reached.

    After all the .com optimism faded away, companies sat around in the boardroom and realised that they'd not only have to *make* a profit, but do it without all the vaporware 'killer apps' that would make everyone and their uncle want their service.

    It's all downhill from here on in.. Enjoy the ride.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  27. Don't expect a free ride from Ma Bell by waldo2020 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Especially in Canada. This the ISP that was first in Canada to impose 5 Gbyte bitcaps on so called "unlimted" usage, after redefining what they observed "unlimited" to mean in the AUP. Their 50$/CDN ADSL-lite per month doesn't include about 28$CDN for a typical land line required. Recently they have enjoyed a customer expansion due to promotions offered only to new customers, but have failed to expand their infrastructure to accomodate the higher loads. They offer a lousy 1Mbit "high speed" ADL-lite or 3Mbit "ultra"(good luck unless you are next door to a central office!) which is the only broadband option to cable based service.Worse, they are pushing their lame anti-virus and spam filter services for 5$cdn a pop. They are so generous - they even have a 35$ adsl "basic" - the 1Mbit product cranked down to only 128Kbit and 1Gbyte capped. Bell has never given anything free - don't expect then to start now- you'll be pulling out your wallet very soon;)

    1. Re:Don't expect a free ride from Ma Bell by grub · · Score: 2


      that was first in Canada to impose 5 Gbyte bitcaps on so called "unlimted" usage

      My ISP called saying I was using more bandwidth than "the average user". I replied "an average is made up of highs and lows, correct? I'm just keeping the average up." The lady asked me to cool the downloads but I've never heard back from them.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    2. Re:Don't expect a free ride from Ma Bell by Malc · · Score: 2

      First of all, they cap the excess bandwidth charges at $30. Secondly, they are increasing the current quotas from 5GB to 10GB (IIRC).

    3. Re:Don't expect a free ride from Ma Bell by compwiz3688 · · Score: 2

      I'd rather pay another 5 bucks just to get uncapped Internet from another company. (See here)

      Then again, I can't get any DSL access until Bell gets off its fat behind and install some damn equipment.

  28. the answer to how to charge is easy... by Traicovn · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "How you get people to pay for it is the big question," said Lawrence Surtees, an analyst at consultancy IDC Canada Ltd., adding that customers in the United States seem to think the service should be free.

    Simple. Allow people to pay by purchasing prepaid cards or using their credit card and charging in block periods of 10 minutes. What's funny is that free wifi could possibly hurt the bell companies already failing payphone services even more if services that allow 'free long distance calls over the internet' become popular again. Although there is the bottleneck issue with wireless connections which would prevent that, plus the poor quality of such services usually (although I often get poor quality from many high-use area pay phones as well)

    --

    [Something witty and intelligent should have appeared here.]
    {Traicovn}
    1. Re:the answer to how to charge is easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Another possibility would of course be to add advertisements to the bottoms and tops of all pages that users viewed, such as through a proxy server or other similar service... However ads tend to be a poor source of revenue... A combination of both is also possible.

    2. Re:the answer to how to charge is easy... by rawrslashdot · · Score: 2, Informative

      I suspect they'll probably charge people in a similar way to how they currently charge for their Sympatico (http://www.sympatico.ca) dial up and high-speed ADSL service. A flat monthly fee, for 'unlimited' usage. Unless you go over their monthly Gbit upload/download limit, in which case they charge you an arm and a leg for going over.

  29. More warchaking symbols? by Stavr0 · · Score: 1

    Closed node with a dollar/euro sign inside to indicate paid access.

  30. Also from Bell by digidave · · Score: 5, Informative

    This took place at Toronto's Union Station, which I walk through every day. Bell also has Internet phones mounted in place of regular phones in a few places there.

    I've never used one of these Internet phones, but they're basically a regular phone with a larger colour LCD display, keyboard and laptop-like pointing device. It's a pretty cool idea, but I've never seen anybody use it and I wonder if very many people would pay for wireless Internet access in a train station where 99% of the people don't wait long for a train during rush hour.

    Also of note, Bell's ISP, Sympatico, has stand-alone pay per minute Internet access terminals in the station. Why would Bell compete with itself on so many levels?

    --
    The global economy is a great thing until you feel it locally.
    1. Re:Also from Bell by gorilla · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Why would Bell compete with itself on so many levels?

      I think it's because it's basically a win-win situation. In places like Union station there are banks of pay phones, and maybe enough traffic to justify 10% or 20% of them. Replacing one phone with an Wifi stand, another with an internet phone and a third with a calling card machine, and they've still got enough pay phones to cover all the traffic. The wifi stand and the internet phone are competing with each other, but the sum is greater than either alone would be.

    2. Re:Also from Bell by mrobinso · · Score: 1

      > Why would Bell compete with itself on so many
      > levels?

      It's an age old marketing technique called saturation. :P

      Basically, you flood a market with competing products, to give the illusion of choice. Some people hate Bell but don't mind Sympatico.

      People get confused, and make impulse decisions. Better have 6 products in the competing sector than 1. More targets === better odds.

      The little guy gets shut out by the big guy, who sells to the little guy anyway.

      Very few companies can compete with Bell at their level. Sympatico and Bell are two distinct entities, and each has a separate group of investors demanding return.

      It makes sense to do this, on so many levels. Of course, making sense doesn't always make cents.

      Regards
      Mike Robinson

      Ok, for the collective good, I'll behave.
      Gimme back my karma now.

      --
      -- Karma whore? You betcha. --
    3. Re:Also from Bell by Traicovn · · Score: 1

      Why would Bell compete with itself on so many levels

      Simple. If you can offer more options for people, and avoid cost overruns, then you have more chances of making profit. Also, they are testing the waters to see where new markets may be. They perhaps aren't competing with themselves as much as they are 'testing the waters' and experimenting with new marketing ideas.

      --

      [Something witty and intelligent should have appeared here.]
      {Traicovn}
    4. Re:Also from Bell by AT · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I built some of the software for those internet phones. You can see pictures of them here. They've got them in the Toronto, Vancouver, and Calgary airports now, too. The usage started out slow, but it is slowly growing; the business case is actually pretty good if its a good location. For the curious, the phones run an embedded Linux kernel with a bunch of custom software.

    5. Re:Also from Bell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used one of these the other day. I was going to see Bruce Springsteen. I checked brucespringsteen.net and found a buy-ticket-now link. When I pulled up the link, cookies identified me as some random stranger who last used the machine. I didn't have the heart to see if the moron was a "one click" purchase person; I logged her out.

    6. Re:Also from Bell by neuph · · Score: 1

      My wife had an interview at the ROM, and I was waiting for it to finish. While I was waiting I tried one of their Internet access terminals (which they've since removed). It was quite the ripoff at something like $0.25 per couple of minutes.

    7. Re:Also from Bell by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      It was quite the ripoff at something like $0.25 per couple of minutes.

      Most people don't use these terminals to chat online or read Slashdot, but rather to connect to the company webmail, for instance, to check their mail. As such the average usage time will be just a few minutes. Obviously these boxes need to pay for themselves so the pricing goes accordingly (because these things are never saturated with person after person).

  31. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Your subversive post has been noted in your permanent record!

    We suggest that you ameliorate the damage to you digital citizenship by reporting three of you evil, hacking, music stealing friends to TIPS.

    hugs and kisses,
    -- Harry Tuttle,
    Cheif junior assistant overseer, TIA

  32. Finding the hotspots by DrJohnEvans · · Score: 1

    Right! We'll systematically try every pay phone downtown. If you can't stick a quarter in it, add it to the list.

  33. https Re:How do you take payments on this? by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 2
    No biggee actually. WiFi has identical security to the internet.

    First you get an account. You can do that using https; https will ensure that nobody nearby can see your CC details. Normal authentication will allow you to check the URL before signing on.

    Once you have an account they need to protect your/their bandwidth from theft. They can do that with VPN software; the VPN software will prevent you from connecting to the wrong box.

    --

    -WolfWithoutAClause

    "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
  34. and yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    one step closer to the [b]mark of the beast technology.[/b]

    1. Re:and yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      one step closer to the [b]mark of the beast technology.[/b]

      Learn basic HTML before attempting to post again.

      The Management.

  35. Correction the Bell URL is... by turing0 · · Score: 1

    The Bell URL for info on the trial is: http://www.bell.ca/accesszone

  36. Why power companies aren't doing this by Nonac · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Phone companies have almost free bandwidth back to their own ISP. Power companies don't. They'd have to pay both a phone company and an ISP for bandwidth.

    1. Re:Why power companies aren't doing this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many power companies run their own ISPs...

      http://www.globeandmail.com/servlet/GIS.Servlets .H TMLTemplate?current_row=1&tf=tgam/search/tgam/Sear chFullStory.html&cf=tgam/search/tgam/SearchFullSto ry.cfg&configFileLoc=tgam/config&encoded_keywords= fibrewire&option=&start_row=1&start_row_offset1=&n um_rows=1&search_results_start=1&query=fibrewi re

    2. Re:Why power companies aren't doing this by Skinny+Rav · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know how it is elsewhere, but in Poland there is plenty of fiber along main power cables - they even considered going into ISP businnes themselves, I don't know if they finally decided. Anyway, I would assume that other power companies also have good network - the only question is if they have good (fat) connections with the Net.

      Raf

  37. Re:Pay phones are "Public Hotspots"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ok, troll.. i'll bite.

    You apparently did not notice that the access point was placed in union station, on the train platform, where commuters wait for their trains (and sometimes wait ON them).

    a perfect place for such a thing.

    what's the matter, jealous that your country is cracking down on your freedoms? move up here, there's plenty of room for disaffected americans.

  38. Re:WiFi Ahoy!...Here's the list of AP locations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Ontario:
    Toronto: Union Station
    Panorama Lounge, Union Station Air Canada Maple Leaf Lounge,
    Pearson International Airport, Terminal 2

    WhooHooo! I'm in range...gotta find that pringles can !

    Kingston: Confederation Park and Marina
    St. Lawrence College

    Quebec:
    Montreal: Panorama Lounge, Central Station
    Dorval Airport, Departures Area
    Air Canada Maple Leaf Lounge, Dorval Airport

    Alberta:
    Calgary: Air Canada Maple Leaf Lounge,
    Calgary International Airport

  39. Wait a second by LostCluster · · Score: 2

    Bell has still not determined the pricing model

    Uhm... so they don't know how to make money from this yet? Okay, this isn't gonna last.

  40. Read on please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have something to tel...

    1. Re:Read on please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...I didn't write this... ...either... (... A little bird ...) ...to do it

  41. Karma Whoring by Znonymous+Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    Original link is dead. Use this one instead

    --

    Karma: The shiznight, mostly because I am the Drizzle.

  42. Spam? by Andrewkov · · Score: 3, Funny

    Be prerpared to have your mailbox blasted with spam from the Bell sympatico.ca domain!

    1. Re:Spam? by robbo · · Score: 2

      That's funny. I'm a sympatico customer, but I never *ever* use my sympatico email address. I've never posted it, sold it, used it as a return address, nothing. Yet somehow, I receive about 30 spams a month to that address. I wonder if selling my address is somewhere in my contract or if they're just making a quick buck and assuming that their customers won't notice.

      --
      So long, and thanks for all the Phish
    2. Re:Spam? by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

      That is interesting, it really shows how unreputable they are. I've been on Rogers high speed for several years. When Excite@home was going through problems, the amount of spam jumped dramatically (about 20-30 per week). Recently, my address changed from @home.com to @rogers.com, and I've been getting no spam since then, but I am very careful about giving out my address (although I always was), and I'm not sure if they have any spam-filtering software on their mail servers. If I need to give out an email address to anyone I don't trust, I give them one of my free web-mail accounts. Remind me to put Sympatico on that list of non-trusted entities! LOL!

    3. Re:Spam? by AndroidCat · · Score: 2
      You know those Sympatico Compass newsletters that they send out every month or two? They hired spammers to send send it for them.

      Received: from delano.blitzdata.com (HELO mailer.blitzdata.com) (172.16.48.10) by mail1.blitzdata.com with SMTP; 2 Dec 2002 18:55:13 -0000

      Blitzdata is pretty pink, and they're using spamware to send it. (The base64 encoding is also a tip-off.) Nice of Sympatico to share email addresses with spammers who probably sold the names out the back door on their next "Millions" CDROM.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:Spam? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      D'oh! I forgot to post the line showing coming through Cossette Communication. 172.16.48.10 is Internet Assigned Numbers Authority and I doubt they are spammers. :^)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  43. Re:WiFi Ahoy! -- indeed! by Horizon_99 · · Score: 0

    mmmmmm deep fried kind soles and chips rrraaaawwgh...

  44. Bell Canada Megacorp by maggard · · Score: 5, Interesting
    First off folks outside Canadia don't realize how HUGE Bell Canada is.
    • They own my long-distance service.
    • The own my local service.
    • They own my cellphone service.
    • They own my ISP.
    • They own my satellite TV service.
    • They own 1/2 the channels on the TV (Discovery, TLC, etc.)
    • They own umpteen other things I'm likely not aware of and use every day.
    Basically, if Bell Canada (or their holding company) wants to do something price isn't a problem, gov't regulations aren't an issue, and they're already so in bed with municipalities they can pretty much plug in anything they want where they want for as long as they want. In short if they wanna go WiFi they've got everything in place to make it happen, happen big, and nobody can compete.

    Profit? They don't need to worry about that for a long time. They could support this for a decade while the market matures and its cost would still be in with the round-off errors of their ledgers. In the meantime they'll OWN the whole deal across Canada and be damn attractive to US sites looking for a stable partner. Forget .bombs, deal with a megacorp with lots of technology already in place. Pretty attractive to a hotel, airport, or municipality.

    Yeah, I think this really could bring a big change to North America. The Baby Bells in the US are fractured and hamstrung. But with the market opened up to foreign ownership and activity Bell Canada may well have found their entrée into the US market. Widespread 802.11, first domestically then in the US, that could well be their opportunity. Forget cellular or land-line, offer a last-mile wireless.

    --
    I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    1. Re:Bell Canada Megacorp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They own umpteen other things I'm likely not aware of and use every day.

      including the newspaper that the article is written in, The Globe and Mail. Well not Bell, but it's parent company BCE...which also owns Nortel which makes ... YYY

    2. Re:Bell Canada Megacorp by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1

      You're using bell for long distance? I don't work for them or anything, but chances are you can save some money by looking at Sprint Canada or Telus. If you phone them up and get them talking about rates, they'll try to make you an offer to switch to them. Then you can say something like, "Well that's about the rate I'm getting from Bell, so what can you offer me to make it worth switching?" and they often give you an additional 10% discout.

    3. Re:Bell Canada Megacorp by dnewlander · · Score: 1

      Not really. Bell Canada isn't one of the top 10 telecom companies in terms of market capitalization (http://biz.yahoo.com/ic/top10/15.html) or in terms of sales (http://biz.yahoo.com/ic/42.html). Just as a point of comparison, AT&T--which basically only offers long distance service and wireless--had sales of over $12 billion for the quarter ending June 30, and $11 billion of that was profit. AT&T has about $16 billion in current assets and $137 billion in total assets. And that's just one of the telecom companies here. Don't get me wrong, I think companies like Bell Canada, Telstra (Australia), and Telcom ZA (South Africa) are doing some pretty interesting and creative things. But even with their explicit or de facto monopolies in their home countries they don't compare with NTT, AT&T, and Deutsche Telecom in terms of size. That said, it's about time more recognition was given to wireless as the appropriate solution to "last mile" issues. Local phone companies worldwide really need to look past their monopoly status to recognize that they have a tremendous, lucrative, cheap, and relatively risk-free opportunity to use their infrastructure (lots and lots of poles, already wired to the network--and usually right next to a power line, too) to make pervasive wireless happen. Forget thinking of wireless as just a phenomenon for business (and other) travelers, it needs to be pervasive, much like the idea Metricom had, oh so long ago... I still miss the Metricom modem I had in Seattle six years ago. Metricom didn't have the money to make this happen. The Baby Bells do, except Qwest, and they're just a bunch of idiots who should be first up against the wall when the revolution comes, in my book. ;) Just my two cents.

    4. Re:Bell Canada Megacorp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's weird, but maybe it's a central-Canada experience. They don't own anything of mine. I use Telus long distance and local service. Telus ADSL is my ISP. Rogers AT&T is my cell provider. StarChoice is my satellite provider.

      Now, I'm a west-coast dweller. But the funny thing is, when I go to Toronto (regularly), I see Telus' presence there much more prominently than I see Bell's presence here. This is all probably more a comment on Bell's current reluctance to market in the West (their services are available, I'm told; you just rarely hear about them).

    5. Re:Bell Canada Megacorp by dbarclay10 · · Score: 2
      Basically, if Bell Canada (or their holding company) wants to do something price isn't a problem, gov't regulations aren't an issue, and they're already so in bed with municipalities they can pretty much plug in anything they want where they want for as long as they want. In short if they wanna go WiFi they've got everything in place to make it happen, happen big, and nobody can compete.

      That's bull. Plain and simple. Bell Canada is MASSIVE, and they're a GREAT BIG BLOODY MONOPOLY. Yay! They're regulated up the wing-wang. I love Bell Canada. They have to sell DSL at *extremely* fixed prices (low to consumers, and way lower to resellers), so I can get 1.2Mbit/128kbit DSL for less than $30CAD a month. (That's less than $20USD, for those non-Canadian folk reading this.)

      What does Bell Canada get for this? A 20-year monopoly on providing DSL service. Of course, "monopoly" is something of a misnomer, since they're required to sell at absurdly low rates to wholesalers/resellers. So Bell may be providing the wires, but they're getting raped on cost. But they have 20 years of these prices to cover the cost of the rollout.

      Rollout, I say? Yes, rollout. Ontario has an amazing ATM network, thanks to Bell Canada, and their government-granted 20-year monopoly. Not only can I get 1.2Mbit/128kbit DSL for dirt-fucking-cheap, but I can get 3.0Mbit/640kbit DSL (That's 400kB/s downloading and 80kB/s uploading) for $60CAD or less. Top that without somebody who has a huge amonut of time to cover network rollout costs!

      Is Bell Canada a monopoly? Yes! Did the government give them this status? Yes! Are we thankful? YES!

      --

      Barclay family motto:
      Aut agere aut mori.
      (Either action or death.)
    6. Re:Bell Canada Megacorp by DMD69 · · Score: 1

      I don't want to burst anyone's bubble, but I just recently left my job at Bell. While you may say that they could support however many money squandering projects for the next 20 years and not notice, you need to understand the situation that has happened in Bell over the past year or so, and what that has created.

      A few years back a guy who was CEO of Bell, Mr. Jean Monty, decided that convergence was the way of the future, so he had Bell buy up big stakes in the three major media, TV, Print, and Internet. After a few years of pushing hard to make this work, and spending BUTTLOADS of money, without ever turning a profit from many of the divisions, investors were wondering what was going on. Fast forward to late 2001/early 2002. Jean Monty resigns, apologizing for the failure that is Convergence. Mr. Michael Sabia takes over, vowing to take Bell back to it's "roots" and become a money making machine again.

      This is where my job goes down the drain - don't get me wrong, I didn't get fired (I wish, I could have taken the severance and had another job the next day... DOH!). However, I worked for BGMi, doing server admin for sympatico.ca, and with the decision to make Bell into a money making machine, anything that wasn't profitable was out. This took a large part of our future plans for sympatico and tossed them to the wind. My job implementing new services became stagnant, I was bored, and I left - the same day that approximately 10% of the company was laid off.

      So, essentially what I'm trying to get across here is that with the direction that Bell is going, they're not going to throw money to the wind, not for a long long time. You don't want to know how much they sank into things like sympatico.ca, and that's money that they aren't going to get back any time soon.

      If this wireless service is going to stick around, Bell is going to figure out a way to make it pay for itself. It won't stay free, guaranteed. In fact, if there isn't enough interest, I'm sure these access points will just disappear come March.

      It's a cool idea, but we need to support it if we want to see it available after the trial run.

    7. Re:Bell Canada Megacorp by Apathetic1 · · Score: 1

      Nevermind all that, if Bell ever runs into profitability problems, they get a subsidy from the Cdn Government because they own most of the communications infrastructure here.

      Not that I'm complaining; I was shocked when I went over to New York and noticed that every payphone I saw was the type that Bell replaced about ten years ago.

      I'm happy with Bell's phone service but I would never buy Internet access from them - I've had too many problems and heard too many horror stories with Sympatico.

      --

      My username does not make me Apathetic. It's irony, get it?

    8. Re:Bell Canada Megacorp by fidelius · · Score: 1

      You call Bell's DSL service a good deal? 1.2Mbit/128K DSL for $30, with a 5 gig limit... This is hardly a deal. Rogers in Saskatchewan provides me with 4 Mbit cable connection for $22/mo with no extra cost for the cable line or modem rental, and they even gave away free webcams for signing up. There's also no bandwidth cap or blocked ports. This is, of course, all to compete with the government owned SaskTel which provides 1.5Mbit/256K DSL service for $25/mo. Socialism may not give us good roads, but it gives us great Internet service.

    9. Re:Bell Canada Megacorp by thebigmacd · · Score: 1

      10 Gig combined limit (as of Dec. 1), thank you very much! :) I don't mind it really...and oh yeah for those with horror stories - move into a newish (30 years or younger) neighbourhood with buried lines. Not that I actually think you should have to, but I haven't had one bit of trouble from my lines.

  45. bad link? by Lord+Kestrel · · Score: 1

    It looks like Bell pulled the article, because it's not there anymore. (Or the editor didn't check the link when he posted...)

  46. I wonder how long they will be free when . . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    people hook up a vonage.com VoIP device to a phone and a router and battery power the whole thing, and slap it in a payphone box next to the AP? :)

  47. Re:Read on please... (it WORKS!!!) (p.s. Really??) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I didn't write this either... A little bird maybe told me to do it ...
    To go the RIGHT! way, click Submit!

  48. Under capitalism, how could it be free? by PatientZero · · Score: 2
    I'd love to convert to something other than capitalism, but as long as that's the society we live in (I'm in the U.S., but Canada from what I understand is much like the U.S. economically), I can't imagine expecting altruism from a for-profit corporation.

    I'm not saying I like it, and I'm not trolling. If the parent post had been funny or sarcastic it would warrant no response other than a good laugh. But the poster seems to believe that any other typical for-profit corporation would provide this service for free and that Ma Bell is somehow an aberration. Sorry to burst your bubble, but when corporations are driven by profit for their shareholders, altruism becomes a breach of contract if it surpasses minor PR-value donations.

    --
    Freedom to fear. Freedom from thought. Freedom to kill.
    I guess the War on Terror really is about freedom!
    1. Re:Under capitalism, how could it be free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As much as our economy does rely on capitalism, the Canadian mentality is less concerned with profit & the bottom line (as opposed to the US mentality) and a slightly more focused on solving problems from a social perspective rather than solely economical.

    2. Re:Under capitalism, how could it be free? by PatientZero · · Score: 2
      True, the society seems to be a little more caring about providing national services, namely health care. Definite kudos for that.

      In the U.S., corporations are beholden to the shareholders, the owners. If they believe the board acted in a way to hurt profits, they can take action (replacing or even suing the board). The Securities Exchange Commission is in charge of policing public corporations in this regard and others. Is there no similar concept in Canada? Or is it simply less stringent?

      P.S. IANAL, nor do I study the stock market. This is my (hopefully correct) limited understanding.

      --
      Freedom to fear. Freedom from thought. Freedom to kill.
      I guess the War on Terror really is about freedom!
  49. Re:Congrats on a Great Idea . . . . at least origi by wiremind · · Score: 1

    I currently have 'unlimited' DSL in Calgary, Alberta through Telus, and I have not yet experienced ANY of these 'limits' everyone whines about.

    --AND--

    I download at least a gig of stuff stuff a day, and i upload close to 500megs a day.

    My only 'limit' is how many IDE drives i can have connected... hehehe

  50. payphones still in big use by zogger · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    --all you have to be is in any area that is infested with criminal alien invaders. The payphones are used extensively because they purchase prepaid international calling cards. They also get jammed all the time from the same criminals stuffing them with non US coins in an attempt to beat the cost by using cheaper foreign money.

    As to the wireless concept, good for them, at least they are trying to come up with something useful, a new business model. Now I *prefer* to see wireless more take off as enthusiasts making their own nets, but it's all good until the bandwith get's hijacked completely by the larger corporations. It's a race now I guess.

  51. /.'d by m0i · · Score: 2

    Woa, bell.ca is slashdotted. Time for a new meaning to 'telco-grade'!
    And I wonder how they can currently protect themselves from abuse; high-speed anonymous access=spammers/hackers haven!

    --
    have you been defaced today?
    1. Re:/.'d by Reece400 · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's just a bad link, try here, http://www.bce.ca/en/news/releases/bc/2002/12/10/6 9602.html

      Reece,

  52. Strange market by Rudeboy777 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    with locations in either airports, railway stations or bus terminals in Toronto, Ottawa, Montreal and Kingston.

    OK, I understand those other cities, but last time I checked, mullet-sporting, wraparound-sunglass-wearing, Camaro-driving guys named Darren didn't care much about WiFi access....

    Seriously this would be the US equivalent of debuting new technology in New York, LA, Chicago and Gary IN.

    --

    From hell's heart I fstab at /dev/hdc

    1. Re:Strange market by thebigmacd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Kingston is a relatively major hub along the VIA Rail Windsor-to-Montreal line. Greyhound has lots of routes to there too. It's sort of the last stop before Ottawa or Montreal. You have a point though...the station is TINY. Not too many people stick around. Not like Union Station in Toronto.

    2. Re:Strange market by duct_tape_n_wd40 · · Score: 1

      ROTFLMAO

      Ohh for mod points...

      --
      .siggy .siggy .siggy .siggy hoi hoi hoi - Prosit!
  53. I disagree by PatientZero · · Score: 4, Interesting
    First, cell phone modems have very limited bandwidth. This is fine for downloading ring tones and getting maps, but would be less acceptable for surfing on a notebook. Also, my guess (I'm not in the telecom business) is that the cell phone network is more limited and valuable than the POTS lines, and the POTS lines are going unused. So, this scheme takes the old underused infrastructure and gives it new life with benefits for the user.

    Additionally, I'd rather not have to whip out my cell phone and an extra modem and cable to look up an address on my Palm. In fact, I'd like to see them put hotspots on the actual buses and commuter trains. Can you imagine how many people would start commuting if they could play BF1942 on the way to/from work?

    While you're at it, tack on an extra train car that houses a bar and a bunch of networked consoles or PCs. People would be riding past their stop on purpose!

    --
    Freedom to fear. Freedom from thought. Freedom to kill.
    I guess the War on Terror really is about freedom!
    1. Re:I disagree by yelligsc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think maybe you missed the point.

      As I understand the parent to your reply:

      - No one is using pay phones for voice calls anymore because they have a personal phone number in their pocket

      - Therefore all the payphones which the telcos have access to (and I would assume cost money to maintain) are not bringing in the dollars.

      - So the conclusion can be drawn that if some other form of profit can be drawn from these payphones, it would be beneficial to the telcos.

      Anyway, with that said I think this is an AWESOME idea. The pay phones have copper going to them that can run DSL, and some type of power source already at the phone.

      Its so obvious I cant believe I didnt dream it up!

      Scott.

    2. Re:I disagree by haloscan · · Score: 1
      I'd rather not have to whip out my cell phone and an extra modem and cable to look up an address on my Palm.
      Actually, many Palms have infrared support and if your cellphone also supports IR, the there's no need for a cable.Many phones also have modem capability making an additional modem also unnecessary.
  54. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA, 1. PROFIT, 2. ???, 3. WI-FI P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL That's the best 'in soviet russia' joke I've seen in awhile

  55. Statistically speaking... by Cap'n+Canuck · · Score: 4, Funny

    My ISP called saying I was using more bandwidth than "the average user". I replied "an average is made up of highs and lows, correct?

    Yeah, and statistically speaking, the average user has one breast and one testicle, so what does that prove?

    1. Re:Statistically speaking... by alch · · Score: 1

      An "average" can also mean "median" value. In that case you may be using more than most people (ie: the top 10% ?) - "average", does not realy have meaning in statistics - mean, mode, and median do - median being the arithmetic "average", mode being the most common and median meaning the middle value when all values are sorted.
      So while the "mean" person may have 1 testicles - I can assure you I have 2.

  56. Rabbit Phones were the others... by CharlieO · · Score: 2

    Rabbit were one of the other major operators.

    The idea was sold as 'second generation cordless' where you used the same phone at home with a base station on your land line, but it would work within 100m or so of a public hotspot - normally near payphone banks as these had the infrastructure and were in obvious places.

    Never really took off as it lost a fight against the improving analogue mobile phone coverage and handset technology. Also if you took the handset with you when you were out, what were the other members of your family meant to use?

    BT over here in the UK sold a similar product recently that was a GSM mobile, but with a DECT (Digital European Cordless Telephone originally, now Digital Enhanced Cordless Telecommunications) air interface as well, called Onephone. The idea being you could register it as a cordless handset with you DECT base station as well as have it on a GSM network.

    When you made a call out it tried DECT first for lower call costs, and of course if you are in range of your landline it would ring as any other handset. It couldn't handover a call from system to the next as this was technically impossible and I have no idea what it did if it got a DECT call during a GSM call or vica versa.

    To make it really useful BT sold a personal number service that would try you landline first, then try GSM to get through to the handset so you could give out a single contact number - but it was fairly expensive to rent.

    Suprised that this idea hasn't been tried more often. But this is getting offtopic so a discusion for another day methinks...

  57. Fighting for customers? by MadAhab · · Score: 2
    Assume that the security issues can be resolved - perhaps no one uses it long enough to just crack WEP, for example. Now also assume that payphones set them up next to, say, coffee shops that offer free wireless: perhaps whoever gives out DHCP first wins. Now the coffee shop is getting poached by the payphone and customers don't like this coffee shop, because their free access doesn't work.

    Now add into the mix that coffee shop is Starbucks, and can easily afford to sue the people running the phones. WiFi is going to get heavily regulated, and soon.

    I predict that within the next 18 months they do a story on terrorists or bad, bad hackers using anonymous access points to do bad things and a real regulatory crush gets on, the real purpose of which will be to ensure that only Big Companies can compete to provide public WiFi.

    --
    Expanding a vast wasteland since 1996.
  58. Piggyback within existing fortresses? by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

    Could the components be shrunk down enough to piggyback within existing fortresses? NYC at least has had declining numbers of payphones (and many LED/powered kiosks) but putting the critical electronics within the fortress and mounting the antenna within the kiosk could make things interesting... ... The neighborhoods in NYC also have issues with payphones being used by drug dealers (search nytimes advanced for payphones) so outright conversion like Bell Canada in certain areas is also an intriguing idea.

  59. Location, Location, Location by jefdiesel · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm in Montreal, right downtown, and I hoped there would more 'public' areas available, but the majority seem to be 'semi-public'
    There's a list, with more promised in the near future, but for now its..

    Toronto, Ontario: Union Station Panorama Lounge, Union Station

    Air Canada Maple Leaf Lounge, Pearson International Airport, Terminal 2

    Kingston, Ontario: Confederation Park and Marina St. Lawrence College

    Montreal, Quebec: Panorama Lounge, Central Station

    Dorval Airport, Departures Area Air Canada Maple Leaf Lounge, Dorval Airport

    Calgary, Alberta: Air Canada Maple Leaf Lounge, Calgary International Airport.

    So we have airports and train stations, not the kind of place to sit for hours just to serve up some mp3's, but since the 'Gare Central' is 5 minutes away on the Metro, I'm gonna head down this weekend and see what kinda speeds I can get

    --

    I hate spyware and spies
    1. Re:Location, Location, Location by killa-b(a+was+taken) · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yea they are all "VIP" lounges, wich already have free internet acess and free computers to use. sooo its not THAT big of a deal.

      however i used to comute between TO and Ottawa on a weekley basis, and found my self killing a few mins ie:30-45 in the lounge all the time.

      i cant see a better addition to the free drinks, free computers, free mag's, and NOW FREE WI-FI.

      its not the greatest test area, but u can be sure its not going to get haxored by some leet script kiddy.

    2. Re:Location, Location, Location by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Kingston and was excited by this news. So I walked over to Confederation Park and Marina (only a few blocks from where I live) with my notebook and 802.11b card.

      Nothing. No signal. No visible boxes at any of the three clusters of payphones around the park. What's up? Does this pilot exist outside Toronto?

  60. Re:Wow! /. BFD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If /. had half a sole they'd mirror sites before posting this stuff. I don't understand why so many poindexters get such a jolly thrill out of overloading someone's server. Try running your own business for a while, cost engineering has its merits. Why should anyone design their servers to withstand the abuses of 250k pocket protectoral pin heads with nothing better to do than go romping about the internet.

    Carma be damned, get over yourself.

  61. The phone booth is my HOUSE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The booth is my house. Get out of my house!

  62. Re:Wow! /. BFD! by digidave · · Score: 2

    Dude, this is the largest owner and provider of communication lines in Canada and likely one of the largest in the world. I know that they're not going to put their corporate web site on an OC-48 with a google-like server farm, but it's still just a little amusing to see a large corporate entity that conrols millions of TBs of bandwidth get /.ed.

    --
    The global economy is a great thing until you feel it locally.
  63. Re:/.'d BFD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If /. had half a sole they'd mirror sites before posting this stuff. I don't understand why so many poindexters get such a jolly thrill out of overloading someone's server. Try running your own business for a while, cost engineering has its merits. Why should anyone design their servers to withstand the abuses of 250k pocket protectoral pin heads with nothing better to do than go romping about the internet.

    Karma be damned, get over yourself.

  64. Not quite a monopoly, in the strictest sense by JonathanF · · Score: 3, Informative

    Bell is definitely pervasive in Canada, but (for the Americans who don't know, but still care) thankfully you don't HAVE to go with them on a number of aspects.

    You can go with alternative long-distance companies; they may or may not have to pay Bell for the "privilege," but if you're not a Bell supporter then you can at least avoid paying the whole enchilada.

    Cellphone service can be provided by Rogers or Telus if you're so inclined. Personally, if I needed a cellphone, I think I'd go with Telus... any company that markets their products with squirrel monkeys can't be all that bad. :)

    With satellite, you do have at least one other choice, StarChoice. You can also always go with cable, if you're willing to deal with the cable company (Rogers for me, often Shaw elsewhere or Videotron in Quebec).

    ISPs, now there's a sore spot. In terms of DSL, the only alternatives are generally small, local services who still have to pay a bit to use Bell's lines. It's either that or cable (again). On the other hand, I know that at least one DSL provider in Ottawa supposedly goes without a transfer cap.

    So you do have alternatives in most areas, but more often than not Bell is there in some capacity, or else you go with the dominating cable company in your area. At least Bell is better than AOL Time Warner down in the states, who practically dominates what Americans see and hear...

    1. Re:Not quite a monopoly, in the strictest sense by Kenshin · · Score: 2
      Rogers and Telus aren't the only alternative cellphone companies. I've been a happy subscriver to Fido for the past four years.

      Sure, they may not have an incredibly large coverage range, but they cover all the areas I tend to be in, and I can roam anywhere in the US.

      --

      Does it make you happy you're so strange?

  65. Re:Wow! /. BFD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yah, right and Darth Vader can totaly beat up Chubaka too!

  66. DNS == free access by Craig+Davison · · Score: 1
    How quickly we forget IP over DNS... Register some random domain name, and have the A record point to a 24x7 connected box (at home or the office) of your choice running nstxd.
    When you get close to one of these APs, start nstx on your laptop.

    An article: http://slashdot.org/articles/00/09/10/2230242.shtm l

    Get nstx at: http://nstx.dereference.de/

    1. Re:DNS == free access by wowbagger · · Score: 2

      And if you are that desperate to get free service that you are willing to have the IP over DNS package installed on your machine at home, and are willing to take the massive throughput hit, more power to you. You represent such a tiny fraction of the universe that you are not even worth worrying about.

  67. Pay? what about Authentication? by kruczkowski · · Score: 2

    What I want to know is how will the acess be billed and authenticated? Are they going to use special WEP keys? or some software that you have to install? What platforms will they support.

    --
    hmm... for fun I enjoy launching DDoS attacks against 127.87.42.5
    1. Re:Pay? what about Authentication? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting question. If its a Westell modem, I suspect that Bell CA DSL is usually PPPoE, but do they shim on the modem or the computer?

      Assuming that the Cisco is DHCP, how would an existing DSL user be able to authenticate to their existing account without some special key, token or other unique authentication.

      Perhaps this has something to do with why the service is currently a free-bee?

  68. Pringles relay.... by NorthernMinx · · Score: 1

    How long till someone builds a Pringles relay from the train station to his house?

  69. on trains next? by hey · · Score: 1

    If you plan things right you don't hang around in the train station very long. It would be very cool if they did this to the pay phones that are already on the Via Rail trains!

    1. Re:on trains next? by NorthernMinx · · Score: 1

      It would give a new sence to the word wardriving!

  70. Re:Congrats on a Great Idea . . . . at least origi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love bacon too.

  71. Didn't Mom always tell you to carry a quarter? by kerskine · · Score: 2

    By putting quarters in the payphone - duh!!

    Seriously, as long as you registered the MAC address of the card (say, on the Bell Canada Web Site), then all you need is a pocket full of change to get access. How about 5 cents a minute, or a $1 per MB transfered?

    --
    ****

    "I'd never want to join a club that would have me as a member" - G. Marx
  72. My 2.4ghz sstv is ready by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2.4ghz is a licensed ham band. Any Part 15 device must accept all interference and not cause any.
    Hams are notoriously cheap, converting a part 15 orinoco card to a licensed part 97 card hooked up to a 50 watt amp and radiated through a beam or worse, an omni, can wipe entire city blocks of little 50mw 802.11b cards, all to send live action video of the ham shack or some other non commercial traffic. Can you complain? No. Do you have to accept the interference? Yes. Is the ham interfering with you? No. PArt 15 devices are like garage door openers. 802.11 is the new CB radio

  73. I can see it now... by AndroidCat · · Score: 2

    Instead of scribbled notes above the payphone of "For a good time call...", it'll be "For a good time browse to..."

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  74. First class, VIP lounges by robbo · · Score: 2

    I've spent a lot of time in the Toronto and Montreal train stations and airports and as far as I can tell, those are all lounges for first class or preferred customers. I wonder what the range is.. if it's line of sight or shorter than a few dozen metres, then these are hardly 'public' access points.

    --
    So long, and thanks for all the Phish
  75. It's already in the UK by skinfitz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Turning payphones into WiFi hotspots has been done for some time now in London; it's just not advertised. If you know how, you can use the bandwidth.

    Not sure they quite meant it to be used this way...

  76. Pricing model by Devlin-du-GEnie · · Score: 1
    Bell has still not determined the pricing model.
    Visions of Ernestine: "Please deposit one die-yimm." Seriously, I'd love to see $0.35 for the first 15 minutes and $0.25 for each 15 minutes thereafter.

    Most airports/greedy hotspots charge $10 for 24 hours of wireless access when you're only in the fricken terminal for 90 minutes. Starbucks charges the same as some ISPs ($30/month). No, thanks. Really.

    Karma is what happens zwischen posts.

  77. BELL-ACCESSZONE by sostoronto · · Score: 1

    The Bell Canada link (which works), with a photograph, found on it's press reslease page is http://www.bell.ca/accesszone Besides the link provided by this site's article there are more popping up at Google http://news.google.com/news?q=accesszone&hl=en&lr= &ie=UTF-8&filter=0

  78. Preventing net abuse? by AndroidCat · · Score: 2

    I wonder how they plan to prevent people from abusing this? Some spammer, who's had his nth ISP toss him off, could just take his laptop and head for the subway. Blocking only port 25 would work because spammers also use open proxy servers on other ports. And if you start blocking too many other ports, what's the use of this? (Hmm, will they try to block KaZaa?)

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  79. Haven't seen a pay phone by Archfeld · · Score: 2

    around here in a long time. Stores had them removed because the were being used for drug deals, and here in California everyone over the age of 8 has a cell phone :)

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  80. Patents? by dachshund · · Score: 1
    I don't know how they actually do it, but one easy scheme comes to mind. The network is kept open, but unidentified users are blocked. Any port 80 requests are redirected to their authentication server which asks for your username and password. It also has a signup page where you can give your credit card number and get a username instantly.

    I've thought about this before and came to the same conclusion. It's so straightforward that I'll bet you some company's already patented it.

  81. Only in Ontario in Quebec by hey · · Score: 1

    Also folks outside Canada might think that "Bell Canada" was coast-to-coast-to-coast (Arctic ocean). But its only in Ontario and Quebec - mind you those are the two biggest provinces. Also the monopoly from the West - Telus - is finally moving into Ontario and Quebec. Don't get me wrong - Bell Canada is still huge!

  82. IHBT(?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    errr... Follow the links, I was asking why Steve Jobs doesn't have his own website to tell the world how great he is (errr other than this one...)

    I wasn't wondering why 'Greg' didn't post his '133t bluebox plans on the interweb.

    Sheesh, some people. Moron, indeed.

  83. Delta Force vs. Bell bureaucracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DF: We're here to take out the terrorist ringleader!

    Receptionist: Do you have an appointment?

    DF: Uh... no.

    Receptionist: Please have a seat. Mr. Sabia has some time a week from Tuesday.

    *Little Spanish Flea plays on the muzak*

    DF: *sigh*

    (Ordering a T1 from them is kinda like this)

  84. Superman Phone Booth Dilemma.... by Tsali · · Score: 2

    haiku...

    superman rushes
    to save toronto, instead
    crashes broadband trunk

    /haiku

    --
    This space for rent.
  85. (OT) Re:DNS == free access by Craig+Davison · · Score: 1
    If it worked well and I didn't have to whip out my credit card or search for pocket change, I'd be happy.

    I'm not sure what you mean by throughput hit. True, maybe 80% of your data is overhead, but it's not like I care about by bandwidth usage at home when I'm not there. Plus I'd generate traffic in short bursts (web surfing, ssh sessions etc)

  86. Der Fatherland Security's Gonna Get Mad by sabat · · Score: 2


    Careful, Tom Ridge doesn't like open access much. If 802.11 is not not encrypted, you must be a terrorist -- see that article the other day.

    --
    I, for one, welcome our new Antichrist overlord.
  87. Bell oh man oh man! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have "Basic" DSL 128 kbps, where it could have been 384 kbps.

    This service has a 1GB cap, and is supposed to be "unlimited".

    I forgot about this and my first month download total was 2 GB, and I got a wondeful 8 bucks extra in my bill :(

    In addition, this service is not at all advertised, in comparison to their infamous High speed service, at 44 bucks a month. (with 5gb cap)

    Moral : Bell SUCKS and is EXPENSIVE. There's a catch in this somewhere.

  88. That's because property managers are buttheads! by aquarian · · Score: 2

    Seriously, this is a really big problem. Property managers are simply not the smartest, most forward thinking people you can deal with. Their motto seems to be: "why should I have to?"

  89. I mentioned this to BT a while ago by barnaclebarnes · · Score: 2

    I mentioned this to BT (UK) a while ago...They have been putting these new payphones that have Broadband, text messaging, Phone, email, web all in a phone box. The logical extension to this would be to add a WiFi areial. This would be a minimal add-on in cost and provide great service for certain types of WiFi users.

    They basically ignored the idea and thought it wouldn't work. I hope this proves them wrong. Imagine being able to pull up next to any payphone and get internet access. In my opinion this is one of the best ways to spread the range of hotspots at a cheap price. They don't even have to sign up the HotSpot locations as they own the spot already. /b

    --
    [Please type your sig here.]
  90. Re:Senseless post! by yelligsc · · Score: 1, Insightful

    How in gods name is this insightful?

    They just reposted the comments they were replying to. It even says senseless post in the title!

    Come on moderators! PAY ATTENTION!

    Scott.

  91. Re:US Gov declares Bell as a Terrorist organizazat by yelligsc · · Score: 1

    I KNEW it was Ma Bell.

    Damn her and her suductive dial done!

  92. I forgot to quote parent by PatientZero · · Score: 2
    And of course this is the one time it bites me in the a$$. The post you thought was my post's parent was actually the grandparent, probably because you're browsing at +2 or higher like me. Your summary is just how I read it, and I agree that using the old system is a great idea, to wit:
    So, this scheme takes the old underused infrastructure and gives it new life with benefits for the user.

    I actually replied to this:

    If everyone had a cell phone with an appropriate modem for their device, there'd be no need for WiFi hostspots.

    It seems using hotspots is a better solution all-around than using cell modems, but again I'm not in the business.

    --
    Freedom to fear. Freedom from thought. Freedom to kill.
    I guess the War on Terror really is about freedom!
    1. Re:I forgot to quote parent by yelligsc · · Score: 1

      Sorry!

      Anyway.. on the actual issue I think we are in agreement. I like the idea of making unused payphones into WiFi access points.

      Anyway.. sorry to flame you for absolutely no reason what so ever!

      Scott.

    2. Re:I forgot to quote parent by PatientZero · · Score: 2

      No worries; I never took it negatively. :)

      --
      Freedom to fear. Freedom from thought. Freedom to kill.
      I guess the War on Terror really is about freedom!
  93. NOT SECURE by brunes69 · · Score: 2

    Er, this would be SO INCREDIBLY insecure it is not funny. All the machines connected to the WAP would be on the same ethernet segment, thus making a man in the middle attack a joke. All you'd have ot do is run Ettercap on the connection (SSL or not, it makes no difference), and boom, you have his CC info. Using IPSEC would alleviate this problem, but that would be a more complex requirement to add onto your customers.

  94. No, every telco but Telus. by brunes69 · · Score: 2

    Not really. Bell Canada (AKA BCE) owns the majority stake in every local telco in Canada *except* Telus. Thus they own pretty much everything east of Alberta.

  95. This isn't really new.. by fadeaway · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Bell has had one of the Internet kiosks in the Bay Street bus terminal in Toronto for the last year or so. Maybe they were just beta testing it there. I never actually got a chance to use it because someone was ALWAYS on it.

    It's a great idea really.. swipe your debit card, buy 30 minutes of Internet time while you wait for your bus. If only they'd add more of them.. and add time limits so everyone can play. =P

    1. Re:This isn't really new.. by Large+Green+Mallard · · Score: 2

      Earlier this year I was in Toronto on holidays, from Australia, and tried to access my back account online.. since my bank uses Java rather pointlessly, it didn't work from the internet access terminals in my hostel.. I then went to these terminals, and they didn't work either. I then went to the "internet cafe" at the "world's biggest bookstore", which thankfully worked. Except they were the same P166's I used when I was there in 1999. Scary.

  96. Been in an airport latley? by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    What he described is exactly how almost all airport wireless access works right now. You use the browser, it redirects you to a an https page where you can buy service for a day.

    I've used them before, and yes I give them CC data - when you're going to be in an airport for four hours and you happen to have a laptop it can be pretty handy (or invaluable depending on crises at work).

    Basically, I just check my CC bill for a few weeks after to make sure nothing funny is going on. You probably are safer in an airport though than some random public access point served by a payphone.

    I wouldn't have a problem using these terminals either, if I had a pressing need for bandwith out in the open near one. I'm not sure when that would happen though as out in the open I tend to have someplace to go, unlike an airport where you are stuck.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  97. Re:Terrorists can't compete anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yikes! Cookoo!

  98. Re:Congrats on a Great Idea . . . . at least origi by TerryAtWork · · Score: 2

    well its true my cable modem's now capped BUT there's tons o idle fiber out there... thats bound to be put to use when things turn around.

    --
    It's Christmas everyday with BitTorrent.
  99. Simple solution? by WayneGayle · · Score: 1

    Insert a quarter.

    --

    "America, I smoke marijuana every chance I get."
  100. Canada is not igloos and skis all year, ok? by ArcSecond · · Score: 2

    Have you ever BEEN to Canada, man? Ever sat out in the middle of August in hot, humid Ottawa? Or watched the sun NOT set north of 60? Or enjoyed spring weather in the middle of december in Calgary because of a Chinook?

    Do you think it gets colder in Toronto than, say, Minneapolis? And I live in Vancouver, where it almost never snows all year. It just rains hella.

    Don't worry, most of your countrymen don't have a clue, either.

    --

    I've got a bad attitude and karma to burn. Go ahead. Mod me down.

  101. Re:Senseless post! by yelligsc · · Score: 1

    And of course, the /. response is to mod me down as well.

    Good job moderators,

    Scott.

  102. Re:wifi = Great || not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there is the slight problem of electrical interferance.. you think Rogers and @home had server uptime problems..

  103. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    This is not the age of pamphleteers. It is the age of the engineers. The
    spark-gap is mightier than the pen. Democracy will not be salvaged by men
    who talk fluently, debate forcefully and quote aptly.
    -- Lancelot Hogben, Science for the Citizen, 1938

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...