The author of the slashdot article says "This is the first known legal action by Apple regarding the hacked version of OS X and calls into doubt the future of other news sites, similar to the OSx86 Project."...
What did he think Apple's reaction to this would be?
I for one am totally SHOCKed at apple's new stance on hacking their products.. this is SOOO FRELLIN SHOCKING!!
I have a hard time understanding why Slashdot ran the first story about Maureen's article... Nice to see that CoyBoyNeal has a purpose besides stupid polling options.. Idiots...
This seems to be a fork of ideas from common UNIX thought. "No Sir I didn't like it". I say it is too different than your standard SysV UNIX.
If they feel that this is SOOOO important then fork a new Linux kernel/distro and call it Desktop Linux, and leave the rest of the world, where we are happy with things the way they are alone.
p.s. Yes I am scared of change.
"Mary had a crypto key, she kept it in escrow, and everything that Mary said, the Feds were sure to know."
Now there is a sig... I almost fell out of my chair laughing!!
Isn't this considered some kind of in-sider trading?
Doesn't this make it MUCH easier to send the exec's to jail? I bet in one year there will be a movie on this....
-Dave
A Rocket Scientist takes the binary code for say the Windows driver... and being a Rocket Scientist that can understand binary, reconstructs code, then makes that code run under Linux.... very simple if you are of Rocket Scientist caliber...
-Dave
YES go to the source....
The ReiserFS Homepage is http://www.namesys.com/
What if the code is "Bubble Sort" or similar
on
SCO To Show Copied Code
·
· Score: 4, Interesting
SCO: "See we use 'Bubble sort' here...".. "And here is an example of 'Bubble sort' in the Linux kernel"
My point is that some algorithms are universal... and if no one has a copy right to them yet... SCO might claim that it is theirs and God save the Queen. It is stupid... We know it's stupid, they are stupid... "Stupid is as Stupid does" or something. This could turn into an ALL of Computer Science against SCO... Microsoft might actually have to help defend Linux to protect themselves.. now that would be funny.
His responses sound like he put as much thought and feeling into them as his lousy acting. Anyone else get the feeling that he is in love with himself?
www.google.com is good....
http://www.fiorella.com/fiorproducts.htm
bottom of page, very nice...
To bad about Perl... but SysAdmin blows chunks
on
RIP: The Perl Journal
·
· Score: 1
I cancelled because
1) It costs too much...
2) Has few issues.
3) Has little content.
4) Has more advertising that content.
5) LinuxJournal doesn't have any of these flaws and Rocks!!
To bad for Perl
Slashdot Mirror
I never claim to be able to spell.. :)))
that's why the fact that it hurt my head was impressive!
-RealRoadKill
not to be the grammar natzi.. but damn reading that summary hurt my head.
The author of the slashdot article says "This is the first known legal action by Apple regarding the hacked version of OS X and calls into doubt the future of other news sites, similar to the OSx86 Project."... What did he think Apple's reaction to this would be? I for one am totally SHOCKed at apple's new stance on hacking their products.. this is SOOO FRELLIN SHOCKING!!
Sooooo true... though I don't think most /.'s would understand this logic.
I've seen windows 2000 BSOD.. so let the jokes continue.
And what are the chances for the gun being EMP protected? Mixing guns and electronics is a really bad idea, regardless if you are for guns or not.
I have a hard time understanding why Slashdot ran the first story about Maureen's article... Nice to see that CoyBoyNeal has a purpose besides stupid polling options.. Idiots...
Amen brother!! I agree... This probably is why so many marriages end up in divorce. People don't take it seriously. It is a joyfull occcasion, but....
Agreed... HellBoy is money wasted..
This seems to be a fork of ideas from common UNIX thought. "No Sir I didn't like it". I say it is too different than your standard SysV UNIX. If they feel that this is SOOOO important then fork a new Linux kernel/distro and call it Desktop Linux, and leave the rest of the world, where we are happy with things the way they are alone. p.s. Yes I am scared of change.
"Mary had a crypto key, she kept it in escrow, and everything that Mary said, the Feds were sure to know." Now there is a sig... I almost fell out of my chair laughing!!
Isn't this considered some kind of in-sider trading? Doesn't this make it MUCH easier to send the exec's to jail? I bet in one year there will be a movie on this.... -Dave
maybe it will incurage SCO's customers to us a non-SCO OS. I say strip it out!! -Dave
A Rocket Scientist takes the binary code for say the Windows driver... and being a Rocket Scientist that can understand binary, reconstructs code, then makes that code run under Linux.... very simple if you are of Rocket Scientist caliber... -Dave
Nuf said... -Dave
YES go to the source.... The ReiserFS Homepage is http://www.namesys.com/
SCO: "See we use 'Bubble sort' here..." .. "And here is an example of 'Bubble sort' in the Linux kernel"
My point is that some algorithms are universal... and if no one has a copy right to them yet... SCO might claim that it is theirs and God save the Queen. It is stupid... We know it's stupid, they are stupid... "Stupid is as Stupid does" or something. This could turn into an ALL of Computer Science against SCO... Microsoft might actually have to help defend Linux to protect themselves.. now that would be funny.
If it feels dirty it probably is... Microsoft is involved somehow... -Dave
Claudia Black (From FarScape), then their problems wouldn't be important anymore... :) Selfish? NEVER!!
Simple put yes...
That people who think there can be unbreakable encryption don't understand encryption? -Dave
His responses sound like he put as much thought and feeling into them as his lousy acting. Anyone else get the feeling that he is in love with himself?
www.google.com is good.... http://www.fiorella.com/fiorproducts.htm bottom of page, very nice...
I cancelled because 1) It costs too much... 2) Has few issues. 3) Has little content. 4) Has more advertising that content. 5) LinuxJournal doesn't have any of these flaws and Rocks!! To bad for Perl
Way to go and good luck/Best Wishes!!!