Slashdot Mirror


RIP: The Perl Journal

mbadolato writes "I'm surprised this hasn't been reported yet. Over at use.perl they're reporting that when the current issue of SysAdmin comes out, this will be the last installment of The Perl Journal. It's a shame. TPJ originally was stopped as a stand-alone, but was then included into Sysadmin. Now that's going too. We all owe a big thanks to all the contributers, and to Jon Orwant, for providing us a great resource in TPJ over the years."

111 comments

  1. Re:if perl is finally dying by cliveholloway · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    You know what, if I was sober, I'd answer this troll in an interesting way, but I'm pretty drunk, so "Oh Fuck Off" will have to do.

    Sorry.

    cLive ;-)

    --
    -- Trinity in high heels carrying a whip: The donimatrix - there is no spoonerism
  2. oh my god, is perl dead for web development? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think perl needs a container much like tomcat is for servlets. *not mod_perl*

    1. Re:oh my god, is perl dead for web development? by Black+Perl · · Score: 1
      I think perl needs a container much like tomcat is for servlets. *not mod_perl*

      Care to explain?

      --
      bp
    2. Re:oh my god, is perl dead for web development? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sorry, i have no idea what i meant by that, but i do know mod_perl is on where near as nice to develope in as servlets. maybe perl needs a perl virtual machine pvm just like the java virtual machine jvm? maybe we need a perl container just like tomcat is a servlet container? maybe it would be nice to have just one instance of perl to execute the *perlets* within this perl container? maybe we can have a connector from apache to this perl container just like mod_webapps is to tomcat? on the other hand maybe it's just wishful thinking on my part.

    3. Re:oh my god, is perl dead for web development? by SantaDust · · Score: 1

      What about Mason (masonhq.com)? I think Mason's components compare to servlets. Also, I believe that parrot will be the equivalent of the jvm.

      --
      This space for rent.
    4. Re:oh my god, is perl dead for web development? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      sorry, i have no idea what i meant by that, but i do know mod_perl is on where near as nice to develope in as servlets.

      Hmmm. Maybe you'd find it easier to "develope" perl if you spelled correctly. "ues CIG::Alppicashin;" won't compile on anyone's perl implementation.

    5. Re:oh my god, is perl dead for web development? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Embperl or Mason ( more like JSP )

      I've found it's easier to develop Perl (w/ mod_perl and Embperl) web pages than JSP or Servlets. That with creating packages, kind of like doing beans in Java.

      Java is nice, but don't discount Perl just because the big companies (IBM, Oracle, etc) don't back it. Remember they make their money off of products linked closely to Java.

  3. We don't need perl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    now we have .NET
    All our journals are belong to Bill

    1. Re:We don't need perl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHAHAHA oh my lord you need to learn what humor is, because my friend, you don't have it. I mean I tried to laugh at that, I tried. But then I remembered how overdone it was and I just said "oh, well that wasn't that funny".

      The end.

    2. Re:We don't need perl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh shut up.... who asked you... I liked it.

    3. Re:We don't need perl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      apples taste like apples.

      and apples are more funny than all your base jokes. and apples aren't really funny. and you smell.

    4. Re:We don't need perl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      has anyone ever called you patronising?

    5. Re:We don't need perl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      some people misunderstand the golden rule of jokes, that the more often you repeat them, the funnier it becomes.

      You, my friend, need to by less patronising.

  4. Request it back to the community? by jukal · · Score: 2

    I have not followed the magazine a lot, but I remember reading it back in 1996, or maybe 1997. Back then, I got the impression that there was some ( a lot ) volunteer effort behind it back then. Could they, like, open source it - and maybe minimize the financial risk involved to it, I understood that they have been making some losses because of it. They could eZine it, and see if it could fly again. Costs would be minimal, or zero to them, just giving out the brand, basicly. It's a shame if a classic like this just disappears.

    1. Re:Request it back to the community? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just grab the last box off the shelf right after they auction off the light fixtures and right before they lock the door, right?

    2. Re:Request it back to the community? by jukal · · Score: 5, Interesting
      this comp.lang.perl.misc posting by Jon Orwant who started the magazine together with Tom Christiansen in 1996, gives some insight how the dilemma started. This is just a short clip:

      "there's no shortage of content out there, and the magazine could easily go bimonthly and then monthly -- indeed, when EarthWeb acquired TPJ I had thought that was the plan.".

      Apparently, TPJ was just in wrong place at wrong time, and fall to a vacuum because of that.

    3. Re:Request it back to the community? by Arimus · · Score: 1

      Strange as it might seem to me I still like paper copies of magazines which I can read away from my monitor... and unfortuantly most eZine's even those with PDF's don't tend to be very well formated in terms of layout etc for hardcopy.

      --
      --- Users are like bacteria -> Each one causing a thousand tiny crises until the host finally gives up and dies.
    4. Re:Request it back to the community? by jukal · · Score: 2
      > Strange as it might seem to me I still like paper copies of magazines which I can read away from my monitor

      I agree. However, it would not need to be only an eZine, they could also sell some company the rights to print it, and take just some percent of the possible profits. What could they loose? :)

  5. Perl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ha, whatever, this is obviously just more beaurocracy from Microshaft, trying to corner more of the Perl market in the northern territories, forcing out pioneers like Phlegm Software.

  6. Too bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TPJ was a great magazine. I've still got quite a few issues, and I learned a lot from it. Sorry to see it bite the dust. :(

  7. Shame to see it go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really enjoyed this one.. any word of a replacement of some sort?

  8. The Perl Review by mir · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Perl Review is exactly what you describe: a Perl journal, distributed only as PDF at the moment. The publishers hope to get it on paper one day, but they wanted to get it started., so the first 5 issues are already available.

    --
    Look, that's why there's rules, understand? So that you think before you break 'em. (Terry Pratchett)
    1. Re:The Perl Review by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      Can't you print PDFs? Print em out. Staple and mail. There you have print.

  9. Sad News by jamieo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is really sad. I've subscribed to TPJ since about issue 3 and have all the issues. The SysAdmin deal was welcome, but only to keep it alive.

    TPJ was such a valuable resource for me as a perl hacker. You learned so much from each issue and people always contributed interesting articles.

    Seems like my 2 year subscription will now be for SysAdmin - something that I'm not really interested in :(

    1. Re:Sad News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, come on.

      The articles on 'optimal methods for changing LaserJet toner cartridge' in SysAdmin magazine alone are worth the subscription.

      Whoo Whoo! In the 1930's young boys grew up wanting to be railroad engineers. Now young boys grow up wanting to be SysAdmins.

    2. Re:Sad News by ellem · · Score: 1

      <i>The articles on 'optimal methods for changing LaserJet toner cartridge' in SysAdmin magazine alone are worth the subscription.</i>

      If only the articles went that deep.

      --
      This .sig is fake but accurate.
    3. Re:Sad News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least your TPJ sub will be converted. The clearinghouse that took my order just took my money and ran. Rat bastards!

  10. Spare paper, save trees by imperator_mundi · · Score: 1

    Perl is the expression of a comunity so an eletronic form with daily news/articles/forums it's more appropriate; of course you can't put a eZine on the tea table, showing your hosts that you're really involved on the tech thing, but that's are luxuries not real needs.

  11. Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't suppose it occurred to anyone to *pay* for the magazine, did it?

    Nahhh... better if they just give up.

    </sarcasm>

  12. Breaking news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perl, barely legal, was found dead in Larry Wall's home this morning, wrapped naked in rope with a gag in her mouth. Truly a terrorist's icon, destroying the US economy with impossible to maintain code. She will be missed by GNU/Communists everywhere.

    1. Re:Breaking news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did you insert frozen logs of feces into your mouth? they've thawed and are finding their way back out of your mouth sir.

    2. Re:Breaking news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was lame (sir)

    3. Re:Breaking news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      drink my pee sir.

    4. Re:Breaking news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there was this one time at band camp...

    5. Re:Breaking news! by SaraSmith · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...when someone started using lines from movies... and it was a bad movie.. and one that people quote all the time... removing comedic value from it... like totally!

    6. Re:Breaking news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone mod down parent, please. It was clearly modded up by the feminazi or if-I-mod-her-up-maybe-I'll-get-laid brigade.

  13. Fantasy economics... by MosesJones · · Score: 2

    They could eZine it, and see if it could fly again. Costs would be minimal, or zero to them

    Lets see if that flys shall we. Costs for an eZine.

    1) Hosting, dependent on load, lets say a basic package with minimal bandwidth $100pm

    2) Time, upload, updated editing, Content Management, configuration. Lets say 4 days a month, effective cost of $200 a day. Sure people can help out, but it still hits the daily job

    So we are already running at nearly a $1,000pm and we haven't even started trying. Bandwidth requirements goes up (a slashdotting a month should do it) and suddenly you are shelling out over 20k a year.

    e != free, haven't we all seen enough .coms implode to know that ?

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    1. Re:Fantasy economics... by jukal · · Score: 2
      > 1) Hosting, dependent on load, lets say a basic package with minimal bandwidth $100pm

      Hosting, dependant on load (if load < insane) zero. Get a sponsor. There's still a lot of companies that want the attention of Perl users.

      > 2) Time, upload, updated editing, Content Management, configuration. Lets say 4 days a month, effective cost of $200 a day. Sure people can help out, but it still hits the daily job

      I agree on this cost.

      > So we are already running at nearly a $1,000pm and we haven't even started trying

      Let's assume the cost would be that $1000 per month. Now, you got an eZine, and the brand of Linux Journal. You give printing permissions for a 3rd party, who sells paper-print copies of it and gives 5% of revenues to you. Can you cover the costs? I don't know, but I don't think it's fantasy economics either.

    2. Re:Fantasy economics... by jukal · · Score: 2
      > and the brand of Linux Journal....

      Eeek. I was looking at that magazine on my desk. I meant Perl Journal ofcourse. I know, I am going to be flamed for this :))

  14. Periodicals are advertising supported... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...and advertising revenue is directly proportional to the receptiveness of the target audience. An audience more impressed by colors and pictures - in other words, less so than by actual information - means more total advertising revenue, and more available revenue means more players in the market.

    This is why you don't see many print periodicals for serious work tools (*BSD, Perl, GCC) and you see mountains of them for toys (Windows, .NET, Visual Basic).

    This isn't sad news. It simply means that the Perl community's priorities are where they belong.

    1. Re:Periodicals are advertising supported... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yak yak yak

      some people never quit their yakking. quit babbling and get the the point please.

    2. Re:Periodicals are advertising supported... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fact: TPJ is dead

    3. Re:Periodicals are advertising supported... by irvmx · · Score: 1

      > some people never quit their yakking. quit > babbling and get the the point please. Just skip over the long words. You wouldn't understand them anyway. Irv

    4. Re:Periodicals are advertising supported... by Sargent1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Advertising revenue is directly proportional to the audience of the magazine and its demographic makeup. A distant third, barely visible on the horizon, is the audience's perceived receptiveness to advertising.

      You mention that there are mountains of magazines for "toys" such as Windows, .Net, and VB, and insinuate that that's because people there like ooh pretty shiny things over content. I counterclaim that a) it's because the audience for such magazines is vastly larger than that for *BSD, Perl, or GCC, leading to far more advertising revenue than is possible for a magazine centered on any of the latter three things, and b) the size of the audience is in large part determined by how little most people are willing to pay for documentation about Open Source software. "I can always just read the man pages or check Google and Google Groups. Why would I pay for a print magazine?"

      To top it off, what advertisers are going to be buying ad space in your hypothetical GCC magazine? "Richard Stallman, live and uncensored, on the hot new tape, When Gurus Go Wild!"

      It's not about content versus pretty pictures; it's about audience size and how much of that audience is willing to pay for things.

    5. Re:Periodicals are advertising supported... by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 2

      Pay for things? but I want it all for free/Free!
      and somehow, I want to make money for doing it for free/Free.

    6. Re:Periodicals are advertising supported... by pmz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's not about content versus pretty pictures; it's about audience size and how much of that audience is willing to pay for things.

      I still agree with the parent post. Most technical print magazines have very little useful content. The only reasons I keep a magazine subscription going is to know what the buzzwords-of-the-month are and to see what the hot-products-of-the-month are. In this respect, the advertisements are actually the content.

      Quite honestly, if I were to take the things I see in a magazine seriously, I would have a record number of failed projects that no one else can maintain to claim responsibility for. The fact is, if a magazine publishes something as a bold-faced headline, odds are that technology is so immature or vaporous that it will disappear into obscurity before I even understand what it is. This is true for nearly any technology domain, regardless of which company is backing the brand names and acronyms.

      Conclusion: magazines are good for buzzwords and "the bleeding edge", but look elsewhere for things on which one can risk a reputation.

    7. Re:Periodicals are advertising supported... by Sargent1 · · Score: 1

      I still agree with the parent post. Most technical print magazines have very little useful content. The only reasons I keep a magazine subscription going is to know what the buzzwords-of-the-month are and to see what the hot-products-of-the-month are. In this respect, the advertisements are actually the content.

      I'll certainly agree that magazines often have very little useful content. But that wasn't what the parent post was arguing. It was arguing that what drives up advertising revenue is having an audience receptive to buying stuff, and that that was linked to liking pictures over content. That's not what drives advertising revenue: it's audience size and audience demographic. The value of the content has less to do with that, beyond its value in attracting new readers.

      I just don't see a large market for most any Open Source magazine beyond the broad ones like Linux Magazine. One for GCC, as the parent poster suggested, wouldn't fly, and not because it would be more content than other tech magazines.

    8. Re:Periodicals are advertising supported... by BrookHarty · · Score: 2

      ...and advertising revenue is directly proportional to the receptiveness of the target audience. An audience more impressed by colors and pictures - in other words, less so than by actual information - means more total advertising revenue, and more available revenue means more players in the market.

      Easy solution, Post naked pictures of CowBoy Neal, the slashdot crowd would all buy one, thats a million copies right there! ;)

      Hehe, seriously, I enjoyed the TPJ also, but i only play with perl, I dont do it for a living. I enjoyed the articles for the learning experience. In fact, I read the changelogs for gcc/perl/bsd/linux just to see what is "Really" going on, thats what I like about slashdot and freshmeat, to announce new releases.

  15. The Community by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Is a myth.

    1. Re:The Community by jukal · · Score: 2
      > Is a myth.

      Here's a myth for you from perl.org site:
      "over 1,000,000 Perl programmers around the world "

    2. Re:The Community by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      that count is so inaccurate it would make Arthur Andersen blush. It's so fudged the Keebler Elves are looking for a new line of work. The numbers are so cooked, it makes Emeril look like Chef Boy-R-Dee.


      Read the fine print. What do they call a programmer? Anyone that has Perl installed. Basically, that means there are 1 million Linux/BSD/other OS with Perl installed/ users.

  16. What will replace Perl Journal ? by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 2



    With Perl Journal gone, what will replace it ?!

    I hope not ".Net Journal".

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:What will replace Perl Journal ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All your base are belong to .NET

  17. Turn on your monitor, . . . by kfg · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    burn sulpher bearing coal that you have to knock down a lot of trees to get to and make yourself more dependent on foreign oil.

    Blimey, this redistribution of wealth is trickier than I thought -Dennis Moore

    KFG

  18. The Perl Journal story .. in Perl! by wackybrit · · Score: 5, Funny

    First the money went..

    $tpj =~ s/\$//g;

    So two magazines merged..

    $sysadmin .= $tpj;

    The advertising slump hit hard..

    $sysadmin =~ s/ActiveState/Make Money Fast!/g;

    And eventually they lost money merged together too.

    $sysadmin =~ s/\$//g;

    The arse totally fell out of the operation.

    $sysadmin =~ s/.//g;

    So they shut up shop.

    exit;

    1. Re:The Perl Journal story .. in Perl! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      #! /usr/bin/perl

      open (PUBLISHING, "1996");
      while (<PUBLISHING>) {
      if ($cash) { print }
      elsif ((sub scribers{}) && ($cash)) { print }
      elsif (join('w/', 'sysadmin') && ($cash)) { print }
      else { print "last issue" };
      }
    2. Re:The Perl Journal story .. in Perl! by daeley · · Score: 1

      You really gotta comment out the narrative. ;)

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    3. Re:The Perl Journal story .. in Perl! by wackybrit · · Score: 1

      I tried! But Slashdot said my post had too many 'nonsense characters'. Slash seems quite Perl-sourcecode unfriendly!

    4. Re:The Perl Journal story .. in Perl! by daeley · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Too many l334 fr33kz ruining things I suppose. :) Otherwise, well done.

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
  19. I saw this 2 days ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I saw this story on www.signalnine.com2 days ago.

  20. IOPCC? by GMontag451 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So does this mean that the IOPCC (International Obfuscated Perl Code Contest) is defunct? Reading the winners from that and trying to figure out what they do was something I always looked forward to each year.

    1. Re:IOPCC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      IOPCC (International Obfuscated Perl Code Contest)
      I imagine every Perl program is eligible for entry. Are there often ties for first place?
    2. Re:IOPCC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Do you think that Chinese is obfuscated because you can't read it? (assuming you don't know chinese...)

      Of course it isn't. Neither is perl - if you learn perl, it's actually quite clear. Just like if you learn korean, it'll be quite clear.

      Why do people assume programming languages should be readable with no effort? The most expressive languages once you have learned them are not always the up-front clearest. C*, Lisp, APL, Forth, Perl are NOT reknowned for their legibility for complete beginners, but would you want to write an OS [C], an AI application [Lisp], a financial analysis package [APL], a spacecraft's embedded systems [Forth], or a genetic analysis program [Perl] in Visual Basic (yuck!)

      * C takes quite some learning - it's just usually one of the first people learn.

    3. Re:IOPCC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I hate to break it to you, but I do know Perl and I make the jibe because I know it and am able to compare it to other languages. More effort is required to read Perl for even an experienced programmer, than (say) to read C. It has a much bigger syntax, more exceptions-to-the-rule, etc, meaning my brain has to do more recall and pattern matching simply to understand exactly what's going on.

      Consider the following RPN statement: 5 2 3 8 4 + / * +. Quick, what's the answer? Now, what's:

      __3
      ----- x 2 + 5
      8 + 4

      That was easy! It is possible, even for someone experienced in basic arithmetic (I assume most readers are...) to find one representation of a calculation easier than the other. This also makes it easier to manipulate (maintain).
    4. Re:IOPCC? by tzanger · · Score: 2

      Do you think that Chinese is obfuscated because you can't read it? (assuming you don't know chinese...)

      You're saying the winners of the IOPCC are not difficult to read? Christ man, I am glad you don't write code for me. Properly structured, well organized Perl is exceedingly clear. IOPCC entries are not.

    5. Re:IOPCC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he's saying that the winners of the IOPCC are difficult to read, but Perl in general isn't, once you've learnt some Perl.

    6. Re:IOPCC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do Yuo thnki Engliudhs si obfuscicated becusea CmdrTAco cant affrdo a splllcheckr?

    7. Re:IOPCC? by SN74S181 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      'Obfuscated Perl' is a redundancy.

    8. Re:IOPCC? by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > Do you think that Chinese is obfuscated because you can't
      > read it? (assuming you don't know chinese...) Of course
      > it isn't. Neither is perl

      Uuuh, hello? He was talking about the OPC. *Those* scripts
      are *definitely* hard to read. I love Perl, and I don't
      consider well-written Perl to be any harder to read than
      well-written English, but if you don't think the OPC winners
      are hard to read, you haven't tried to read them. You can
      spend _days_ trying to figure them out.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    9. Re:IOPCC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The post you replied to was replying to an AC post which basically asserted that _all_ perl code is hard to read, not to the one about the IOPCC.

    10. Re:IOPCC? by OrangeTrafficCone · · Score: 2, Interesting
      As the most recent Best of Show (2000) recipient, I am very saddened to hear of TPJ's demise: it robs me of defending my title with this sort of stuff:

      $;=q(,225:332.711,242.913,233:543:253:357:777,233: 626;422:345);
      $,=length($0.$^T);$:=join"",map{chr(hex("2$_"))}sp lit(//,"dbfa");
      for(unpack("A4"x++$,,$;)){eval"y|.:;,|$:|";($,,@,) =split(//,$_);
      print chr(ord('`')+eval join($,,@,));}print"\n";

      This contest gave me an outlet to keep my production code from complete incomprehensibility.
      I have been cooking up entries for over a year now, waiting to hear the opening bell for the next contest, which it appears will now not ring.

      P.S.: if anyone wants to see Yahtzee implemented in less than 1k, drop me a mail.

    11. Re:IOPCC? by GMontag451 · · Score: 2

      You wouldn't think so if you saw the contest winners. They make normal Perl look like Cobol. Line noise looks more readable than most of the entries.

    12. Re:IOPCC? by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      (* So does this mean that the IOPCC {International Obfuscated Perl Code Contest} is defunct? Reading the winners from that and trying to figure out what they do was something I always looked forward to each year. *)

      That reinforces my theory that Perl fans *like* obfuscated code. If something is too easy to read, then Perl fans get bored.

      Nothing wrong with that. Everybody's boat floats on different water.

  21. Perhaps... by ldopa1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Perhaps the reason that nobody has reported it is that very few people read it in the first place, and as such, very few people care.

    This may also be the reason that they aren't going to be continuing with the journal in the first place, don't you think?

    I doubt few people lamented the end of the Ultrix journal....

    --
    The Dopester
    "Yes, I'm a Karma Whore, but I'm doing it to pay my way through school."
    1. Re:Perhaps... by mosch · · Score: 2

      Indeed, far more people will read of the passing of TPJ than ever subscribed to it. At the end of the year 2001, The Perl Journal had a circulation of 16,000 including newsstands.

    2. Re:Perhaps... by erat · · Score: 2

      Thank you for pointing out what so many folks seem to have missed: the thing is dying because it isn't popular.

      Of course, I'm still waiting for someone here to pull a Loki and insist that we all must dig into our pockets and make donations to keep it going even if we don't care about the stuff. It'll happen...

    3. Re:Perhaps... by .com+b4+.storm · · Score: 1

      I had wondered for a long time where Perl Journal had vanished too. Perhaps that is also part of the problem -- if even Perl zealots don't know where to find the journal, what hope does it have?

      --
      "Wow, you're like some kind of superhero able to ward off happiness and success at every turn."
      -- Ryan Stiles
    4. Re:Perhaps... by Chundra · · Score: 2

      I subscribed to TPJ back when it was TPJ. It used to be a nice journal until Sysadmin took over. They had clever/funny covers, good articles, and all was nice. Then it became pretty corporate feeling when Sysadmin was publishing it, with more advertisements than articles. The number of pages dropped, and the cool covers disappeared. It basically turned to shit, minus the occasional article from the oldtimers. That's why I don't care now. I *did* care that it was going under way back when, before Sysadmin started publishing it.

  22. Re:if perl is finally dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Why are you drunk so early in the morning? Are you an alcoholic?

    If you drink too much, turn it over to a higher power and join AA. You will be glad you did. You will save money too. Booze is a terrible money sink.

  23. No Real Surprise by elmegil · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I think part of the problem is that Sysadmin did their best to offend the TPJ subscribers they inherited.

    • Content was somewhat redundant, with perl articles in the Sysadmin section as well as the TPJ section.
    • Only 3 or so real TPJ articles every other issue (at least it seemed pretty sparse) as opposed to the 8 or more in the old TPJ.
    • Most damning, if Sysadmin treated everyone like they did me.... As soon as the two merged I was inundated with snail-mail spam. Eventually I figured out that some code on the address meant it came from Sysadmin, and I called and complained. They told me I could opt out, why was this a problem? At least I got opted out and the flow had slowed way down since then.
    I had already renewed my subscription (boy do I regret that doubly now) but wasn't planning on renewing again anyway. Not because TPJ wasn't wanted, but because what I was getting in Sysadmin wasn't really TPJ any more, and Sysadmin itself isn't of any interest or use to me and they abused the relationship.
    --
    7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    1. Re:No Real Surprise by andyo · · Score: 2

      I never felt that SysAdmin was the right place for TPJ articles. The typical system administrator writes scripts to parse logfiles and such; he or she has no need for the envelope-pushing, clever techniques promoted by TPJ. TPJ was a wonderful journal with high standards for content and editing (and layout, back when it was a stand-alone publication). I miss it. Incidentally, I still like SysAdmin too.

  24. Good rag, bad management by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back in 1997 (I think) I tried to subscribe to TPJ. I mailed in a subscription card from one of the many O'Reilly books I had and waited. I never heard back from them and soon forgot about it. The following year, I remembered and sent them an email asking about subscriptions. Their terse response was: "If you really wanted a subscription you would have sent payment with your subscription card." I asked why they hadn't sent me an email as I had included my address. Their response: "We don't do that."

    Well, I thought that was pretty (poor|arrogant), and I never did subscribe. RIP TPJ.

  25. To bad about Perl... but SysAdmin blows chunks by RealRoadKill · · Score: 1

    I cancelled because 1) It costs too much... 2) Has few issues. 3) Has little content. 4) Has more advertising that content. 5) LinuxJournal doesn't have any of these flaws and Rocks!! To bad for Perl

    1. Re:To bad about Perl... but SysAdmin blows chunks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux Journal doesn't have any ads?
      HAH!
      That's exactly why I let my sub just die.

  26. Perl Security Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  27. O'Reilly to publish 'best of' anthologies by jacobito · · Score: 5, Informative

    In case you haven't heard, O'Reilly will be compiling and publishing three anthologies of the best articles from the Perl Journal:

    Games, Diversions, and Perl Culture
    Web, Graphics and Perl TK
    Computer Science and Perl Programming

    If you've never read TPJ before (or even if you have), be sure to grab one of these books when they come out. TPJ set a high standard of quality, with articles that were intelligent, entertaining, and usually a bit quirky.

    1. Re:O'Reilly to publish 'best of' anthologies by BrookHarty · · Score: 2

      Speaking of resources, where is a good place to hang out and read/chat about perl? Which IRC network, Which Message Forum. Where do all the perl gurus hang? I hear people are dropping from usenet and going to message boards, so which ones?

      Thanks!

    2. Re:O'Reilly to publish 'best of' anthologies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you see some good stuff over on perlmonks.com. comp.lang.perl.misc is alright... sometimes. IRC is a total waste of time. #perl isn't about perl, just random bullshit and asshole ops.

    3. Re:O'Reilly to publish 'best of' anthologies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the links. Leave it O'Reilly to make a buck off of anything.

  28. Any way to get old issues.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any way to get ahold of old of TPJ? Maybe in CD?

    1. Re:Any way to get old issues.... by codejester · · Score: 1

      Ya, go to the website and click "CD-ROM".
      here

  29. Amber Ankerholz wins again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She's a lazy airhead. She's run SysAdmin into the ground. Fire her, please. She's nothing but an affirmative action hire. Let her drink her martinis somewhere else. Gawd, is she stupid.

    In Letters, a real sysadmin pointed out all the technical errors in merely one article in merely one issue of this execrable mess. All she had to respond with were some snippy comments about his spelling and attitude. Get rid of her, NOW.

    CMP Media Management needs to quit hiring based on gender (that is, the slit between her legs) and start hiring based on ability. SysAdmin, what an awful magazine. At least Linux Journal got rid of that nitwit that put a naked person on the cover of a supplement. Try explaining that one to a boss!

  30. Maybe I'm just stupid by pileated · · Score: 1

    but I first subscribed to TPJ about 18 months before its sale to EarthWeb. That sale seemed to be the beginning of the end. I loved TPJ and found that I often learned more from it than I did using either web pages or books. But obviously I must have been in the great minority. I'm still wondering why.

    It does make me wonder though if any print programming magazines are doing well these days?

    1. Re:Maybe I'm just stupid by OrangeTrafficCone · · Score: 1

      I subscribed at issue #4 from Dr. Orwant himself (Usenix 1997), and I agree: the EarthWeb deal was the start of the downward spiral. I remember how EW wanted you to subscribe to their website (credit cards only, thanks), and they would throw the print version at no additional charge... I would still send my money in the old fashioned way. I suppose TPJ is yet another victim of the dot-com-bustables and the down ad market.

  31. Free Software Programmer Magazine by MikeFM · · Score: 2

    I'd really like to see a magazine that covers all of opensource programming. Perl, Python, PHP, MySQL, GCC, bash scripting, opensource libraries, opensource tools, free codecs, etc. Everything a programmer that develops opensource software or with opensource software could want and no commercial crap we don't want. Something like Dr. Dobbs but covering only opensource.

    If it covers more topics it'll have a wider audience which in turn will give it more advertisers. SysAdmin is a good magazine but it really isn't programmer-centric or 100% opensource so there probably is room for another magazine out there.

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  32. Re:if perl is finally dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i liek poo

  33. SysAdmin no longer compelling by arfy · · Score: 2

    I buy SysAdmin at shops because the mail delivery here is atrocious; I've tried subscribing to magazines in the past and it never has worked. I was annoyed at the diminishing page count in SysAdmin. The Perl Journal and Elizabeth Zinkann's book review column were the main reasons I continued buying it. They dumped the latter at the beginning of the year and now they're removing the remaining reason. I'll still browse it and buy a copy now and then if it has a really superior article on some topic I consider vital but I'm no longer compelled to complete the set.