Slashdot Mirror


User: spt

spt's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
58
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 58

  1. Quality, not quantity. on Concerning The Cancellation of Futurama · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So there's 4 seasons. Isn't that enough?

    Some of the best things come in small doses - take Fawlty Towers, for example, one of the funniest sitcoms ever, and they only made 12.
    John Cleese said he put everything it needed in those 12 episodes.

    If you can live with 'only' 4 seasons of Futurama, perhaps the writers will come up with something better.

  2. Re:what license on An Open Source Direct3D 8.0 Wrapper for Open GL · · Score: 3, Funny

    Picking a file at random (dsetup.h) shows


    *
    * Copyright (C) 1995-1997 Microsoft Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
    *
    * File: dsetup.h
    * Content: DirectXSetup, error codes and flags


    so, whatever license the DirectX SDK comes under I guess.

  3. Re:The 13. on 13 Nominations to Rule Them All · · Score: 1

    You're right - "adapted screenplay" would have increased my average characters per line as well.

  4. The 13. on 13 Nominations to Rule Them All · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Best Picture
    2. Supporting Actor (Ian McKellen)
    3. Director (Peter Jackson)
    4. Screenplay
    5. Art Direction
    6. Cinematography
    7. Sound
    8. Original Score
    9. Original Song
    10. Costume
    11. Film Editing
    12. Makeup
    13. Visual Effects


    To avoid the new lamesness filter, I need to increase the average length of my lines ... please ignore the following.
    Try to reply to other people comments instead of starting new threads.
    Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.
    Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about.
    Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page)
  5. Re:Art vs. technology? on Part One: Information Arts · · Score: 1

    Nb. I don't agree ... I was just trying to see if I could make sense of JK's argument.

    In the modern day we are exposed to much more art (assuming TV and other media still count as art) and technology. In some areas, they still influence each other greatly, in others they still don't.

    I think this whole article boils down to misplaced generalisations.

  6. Re:Art vs. technology? on Part One: Information Arts · · Score: 1

    What he's trying to say, I think, is that from the outside (i.e. by non-artists and non-scientists), Art and Technology were considered as different things.

    When one looked at art, one didn't necessarily appreciate the technology behind it (although the artist did). And when one was introduced to new technology, the artistic roots or applications weren't necessarily obvious.

  7. 1 sentence in on Part One: Information Arts · · Score: 2, Funny

    For centuries, art and technology have been considered separate parts of culture

    No, they haven't.

    I shall stop reading here.

  8. Re:cuecat on Slashback: Playstation, CueCat, Games · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They probably don't want to have to support the customers that would get one - "my cue:cat doesn't understand the barcode on my baked beans .. whine whine whine"

    They may well want to sever their relationship with the digital:convergence to, and smashing the things to bits is a great way to send that message.