Slashdot Mirror


Concerning The Cancellation of Futurama

Andie Similon of gotfuturama.com writes: "We have recently heard from 4 reliable sources that fox did not pick up the 5th season of futurama. So it's going to get cancelled. We (the fans and webmasters of cgef and other websites) have set up a letter campaign to Fox,' but we need some big sites to spread the word. There are two possibilities of saving futurama A) some other network picking it up B) Fox realizing its mistake (I don't count on it), but the only way we can realise this is that we can get a very big amount of written letters to Fox." Go read the online petition and/or sign it. They've temporarily removed other content on anything else from the site -- there are priorities, after all. Futurama is one of the few shows that make me glad for the invention of television.

626 comments

  1. Ah CR@P! by Chas · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Well. I guess Groening can't have every series mirror 'The Simpsons'.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:Ah CR@P! by RiotXIX · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well. I guess we can't get rid of all people who make uninformed judgements.

      --
      "You know you don't act like a scientist, you're more like a game show host." Dana Barret
    2. Re:Ah CR@P! by MaxVlast · · Score: 1

      Right. Not as good as The Simpsons, either. =)

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    3. Re:Ah CR@P! by Chas · · Score: 1

      Note: I didn't say that Futurama wasn't as good as The Simpsons.

      I merely said that every Groening series can't necessarily duplicate The Simpsons success. No matter how good it is.

      Thanks for reacting instead of actually responding.

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    4. Re:Ah CR@P! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Nothing* is as good as The Simpsons.

    5. Re:Ah CR@P! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you!

      No show can ever do what the Simpsons has done. Never.

  2. Probably the most poorly promoted show ever by Microsift · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I love the Simpsons, but never got into Futurama because there was never enough promotion of the show to make me remember to turn it on. I've seen a couple of episodes of Futurama, but I couldn't tell you what time it's on, or for that matter which day.

    --
    My other sig is extremely clever...
    1. Re:Probably the most poorly promoted show ever by LordNimon · · Score: 2, Funny

      I guess it's time you bought a TiVo.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    2. Re:Probably the most poorly promoted show ever by Keith+Mickunas · · Score: 1

      Its on at 7pm Eastern time on Sunday night. Now do you see why you don't know when its on? For a good part of the year its not shown because of football. The rest of the time people just aren't watching that much TV then.

    3. Re:Probably the most poorly promoted show ever by SocietyoftheFist · · Score: 1

      Bwahahahaha..... I guess it didn't carry itself heh? Think about your statement and you will see exactly why Fox is cancelling it.

    4. Re:Probably the most poorly promoted show ever by Platinum+Dragon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I love the Simpsons, but never got into Futurama because there was never enough promotion of the show to make me remember to turn it on.

      I don't watch much TV outside of certain shows I consistently switch on. I was never able to find Futurama after it was initially shuffled away from post-Simpsons Sunday nights, and I saw maybe one promo for the show on Fox after it premiered, ever. Once it moved, I was never able to find it again. Meanwhile, crap like Malcolm in the Middle and Boston Public eats up numerous promo slots. Fox just had no interest in cultivating a post-football, pre-Simpsons audience.

      To some extent, the numerous advertising breaks during football games help push the broadcasts outside of three-hour blocks. It's as boring for people in the arena as it is for viewers at home, and while I'm sure the offense enjoys an extra minute or so to talk strategy, it just messes with the flow of the game. Long post-game wrapups don't help, either; does Fox really need to run ten, fifteen minutes of JB and the boys cracking jokes at each other? Does it boost advertising revenue that much? You'd figure Fox would want to cultivate post-football viewing by preserving the show in the next half-hour slot, instead of running over it all the time. It would especially help those slow periods between football and the next sports season, when a show has to live on its own popularity instead of getting a boost from football.

      But then, I'm not a network executive, nor would I want to be.

      Luckily, Global up here occasionally runs it as filler during dark hours, so I enjoyed a Futurama marathon two nights ago:)

      --

      Someday, you're going to die. Get over it.
    5. Re:Probably the most poorly promoted show ever by canadian+troll · · Score: 0

      yeah, i saw that too, it was saturday night, and was on instead of that god awful Saturday Night live, which sucks big fat goat cock, because it's outlived it's time.
      At least global puts the shows on, even if it's just geeks and guys sitting at home with their infant daughters(me) watching tv.

    6. Re:Probably the most poorly promoted show ever by RoninM · · Score: 2

      Don't be silly -- MST3K was the worst promoted show (that didn't suck). SFC moved it to--what?--6am PST and never ran a commercial for it. Since then they've cancelled it, moved it to 9am PST/EST and extended the contract (for extant episodes) a few times. Futurama received some promotion, although those on the east coast were overrun. The Tick received no promotion. Family Guy received almost no promotion.

      --
      If a corporation is a personhood, is owning stock slavery?
    7. Re:Probably the most poorly promoted show ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Same here in the UK. When it first appeared, it was really easy to get into, but then the second and third series were moved into strange timeslots and not given enough coverage. Every time I catch one now, it seems to be a repeat of a series 2 episode. Off the top of my head, I couldn't tell you which days it was on, except Sky 1 used to play an episode an evening, but I think they were repeats. And if anything in the schedule changed, it was always Futurama that got chucked. Strange seeing as Fox Murdoch also owns Sky.

      Offtopic a little: they also did that with Family Guy here. The DVD of series one saved that for me, as yet again, they screwed around with the programming for it.

    8. Re:Probably the most poorly promoted show ever by LMariachi · · Score: 1
      Family Guy received almost no promotion.

      Which Fox network have you been watching? For the past six months you couldn't watch Fox for twenty minutes without seeing a promo for for that derivative unfunny piece-of-shit show, and that was on something like its third incarnation. Thank god it's finally gone.

    9. Re:Probably the most poorly promoted show ever by vartvart · · Score: 0

      Family Guy was the most poorly promoted show ever. Period. Sign the petition to save it!

    10. Re:Probably the most poorly promoted show ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i cant beleive the idiots at fox. they are getting rid of all their quality shows (futurama, family guy, etc) and keeping all their crap.

  3. ok, let me get this straight... by night_flyer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    X-Files - last season
    The Tick - Cancelled
    Futurama - Cancelled
    The Chamber (which they fought so hard to get it out before the chair) - cancelled (thank God)

    just what in the hell are they going to replace these shows with? Its not like a lot of quality material is knocking down the door at FOX

    (that 80's Show?... uggg)

    --


    Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
    Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
    1. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot Family Guy - Cancelled

    2. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by haedesch · · Score: 1

      dont forget family guy :-((
      i heard it was cancelled too

    3. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But those shows you listed SUCKED. X-Files has stunk to high heaven ever since the movie. It's been all downhill.

    4. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by dildofire · · Score: 1

      wait, they fucking cancelled family guy? that's funniest fucking show in the world! there is no god.

    5. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by erat · · Score: 2

      I think they should convince David Lynch to make Mulholland Drive back into a series and air that. At least there'd be something worth a damn on TV. As it stands, even the worth a damn stuff isn't much worth a damn.

    6. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by crow · · Score: 2

      Dark Angel is still worth watching.

      The Simpsons is heading into, what, season 12? It's not that original anymore, but still funny.

      I'm enjoying 24, but I've heard that Fox was very disappointed with the ratings, so while they'll do 24 episodes, I wouldn't count on that being back next year.

    7. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      (that 80's Show?... uggg)

      What are you talking about?

      It's not a pay phone! It's a portable phone!

      Comedy like that doesn't come around every day, you know.
    8. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by Platinum+Dragon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, I watched about ten minutes of the Chamber, once.

      Somehow, the thought of torture becoming a game show disturbed me. That feeling probably hasn't been helped by the intermittent discussions of how to make torture in the interrogation of suspected terrorists palatable to Americans.

      I'll miss the X-Files, though things kinda started to tank once Duchovny started throwing his weight around - getting the show moved from nice digs in Vancouver, then leaving, then not, then leaving, then not, forcing Carter and the writers to dance around this... just a mess. A part of me wishes Mulder had just been McLeaned at the end of the seventh season, instead of letting him play these games and drag the death out so much longer.

      Never watched The Tick. Live-action versions of animated shows just don't resonate with me for some reason. Probably something about the inherent absurdity of cartoons, combined with the ability to depict events and places far cheaper than showing the same things in live-action.

      That 80's Show should make like the decade and be over. I'd like to forget the greed-is-good, disco-hangover 1980's, thanks. If anyone tells you the 1970's lived off pretension, please see "Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous" and glam rock, then slap the person who tells you that.

      --

      Someday, you're going to die. Get over it.
    9. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by haedesch · · Score: 1

      its season 13 already :-)

      Indeed, the simpsons arent original anymore, but theyre still really really funny.

    10. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by AKA+da+JET · · Score: 1

      Family Guy was abnoxious. But I will miss Futurama, even if I had a hard time catching it on TV.

    11. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by EvlPenguin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      FOX is nothing but a myriad of sleazy network executives. There were three things that kept me watching that channel after the X-Files started sucking (like, 4 seasons ago): Family Guy (now canceled!!!), Futurama (alas...) and The Simpsons. Now it's down to just the Simpsons.

      I'm not one to flame, but the people at FOX are smoking something with strong hallucinagenic qualities. What the hell are they going to replace it with? Another "extreme" game show?!??! Another Survivor rip-off?! Maybe they'll show re-runs of Boston Public! Ooooh!

      Regarding Family Guy -- what was perhaps the best [funniest] show on televesion -- there's a petition and information on a letter writing campaign over at Planet Family Guy. What a morbid world we live in.

      --

      --
      #nohup cat /dev/dsp > /dev/hda & killall -9 getty
    12. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by Gulthek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Malcom in the Middle is pretty hilarious, but one show isn't enough to run a network on...just look at UPN.

    13. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by ArnoldYabenson · · Score: 0
      Allow me to agree that Family Guy was pure shit before all the bumpkins who thought this show was "brilliant" pile on you.

      Futurama gone? That really sucks.

    14. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bumpkin, huh? man, i wish i was cool enough to agree with you.

    15. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by Platinum+Dragon · · Score: 1

      I'm not one to flame, but the people at FOX are smoking something with strong hallucinagenic qualities.

      Actually, from what I can tell, people who smoke stuff with strong hallucinogenic qualities like at least some of those shows. Therefore, the FOX execs aren't smoking anything (aside from cigarettes), but they're probably drinking a helluva lot of something.

      Probably Kool-Aid.

      --

      Someday, you're going to die. Get over it.
    16. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by MaxVlast · · Score: 1

      I hear that Family Guy is getting cancelled every season or so.

      The difference is that the other shows suck =)

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    17. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by dildofire · · Score: 1

      thanks for the family guy link. good to see somebody else appreciates that show, what with all the abuse it's getting on this thread.

    18. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by amuro98 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Tivo accidentally recorded "The Chamber" instead of Futurama once (stupid Fox switched their schedule at the last moment.)

      I was eerily reminded of the gameshows like those in 'The Running Man.'

      The Tick was actually pretty good. A bit different from the comic and animated series, but still quite funny.

      Between The Tick and Futurama, FOX is sending a clear signal that they don't want me watching their station anymore.

    19. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by MaxVlast · · Score: 1

      Hey man, Special Unit 2 changed my life! The Andy Warhol-like villian redefined my ideas of evil. We need more shows like Special Unit 2!

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    20. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're abnoxious

    21. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by RAVasquez · · Score: 1

      They've cancelled Family Guy several times now. It's back right now as a midseason replacement. As long as there are still shows, it'll survive.

      --

      --- Work, worry, consume, die. It's a wonderful life. -- Bill Griffith

    22. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Im just hoping Titus and Dark Angel arent next...

    23. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by RAVasquez · · Score: 1

      Somehow, the thought of torture becoming a game show disturbed me. That feeling probably hasn't been helped by the intermittent discussions of how to make torture in the interrogation of suspected terrorists palatable to Americans.

      Reminds me of a commercial Robin Williams did for Amnesty International -- "Welcome to Wheel of Misfortune!" I'm a little queasy at the idea of torture-for-ratings myself.

      --

      --- Work, worry, consume, die. It's a wonderful life. -- Bill Griffith

    24. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by nunoalves · · Score: 1

      Actually futurama was an horrible show... Thank god it was cancelled. I wondered who used to whatch that thing.

      As for the Xfiles... man, they simple stopped being creative after a while.

      --
      Nuno
    25. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by Cuthalion · · Score: 1

      The tick was missing any of the crime-fighting element that kept the comic and animated versions moving. It was funny, but was just a sitcom where everyone wore tights.

      --
      Trees can't go dancing
      So do them a big favor
      Pretend dancing stinks!
    26. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by sludgely · · Score: 1

      Dark Angel was never worth watching.

    27. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by aleclee · · Score: 1

      So they cancelled Lone Gunmen to bring back a previously-cancelled show whose triumphant return lasted all of one season. Brilliant.

      --
      This message composed using 100% recycled electrons.
    28. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by ari_j · · Score: 1

      the people at FOX are smoking something with strong hallucinagenic qualities. What the hell are they going to replace it with?

      Acid.

    29. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by crystalplague · · Score: 1

      hmm...we have thousands of members here...anybody up for a hostile takeover of fox?

    30. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Get it straight, Duchovney did not "throw his weight around" to get the show moved to California. The tax subsidizing in Canada were being lowered and it became just as expensive to shoot in Canada as it did in Hollywood and the producer wanted to move to California. Duchovney said he would agree with the move on the grounds that he could see his family more, and the press took off about how Duchovney was forcing the show to go to California. Atleast try to know things before you post them.

      P.S. I am not a David Duchovney fanboy.

    31. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by ArnoldYabenson · · Score: 1, Interesting
      There was very little crime-fighting in the issues of Tick that I've read. Perhaps you need to refresh your memory on this.

      The TV series was more like the comic in this respect than the kiddie-oriented, conventionally-structured cartoon.

    32. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by g0dm0de · · Score: 0

      "AN horrible"? wtf is wrong with you, will you goddamn morons PLEASE learn the correct usage of the word "an"!?

    33. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by ahde · · Score: 2

      I think you mean Mutant X... Isn't special unit 2 the one with then gnome?

    34. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by Da+Masta · · Score: 1

      I don't know...the first two seasons were absolutely great, but this season is pretty shitty really. I mean, did they even show the second part of the god-awful season premier?

    35. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      X files has been crap cince Season 4.
      they started to seperate from the actual premise the show was based on and started to wander into a freakshow.

      Sorry, but a 4 armed freak with 2 sets of teeth is the result of inbreeding not aliens... I got sick of the ghost crap, and the other "phenomona" that they decided to switch to.

      Basically , after the Movie and the first 10 episodes after that, the show tanked and became crap... and stayed there.

      Futurama was placed at a death slot (7:00pm sunday's.. what nimrod thought that was a good one?) and most everyone I know would say, "Damn, I keep forgetting that it's on then, I start watching at 8pm"

      FOX never wanted futurama to exist. and their handling of the show is proof.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    36. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by TheAlmightyQ · · Score: 1

      Some clarification:

      Jessica Alba was worth watching,
      Dark Angel was not.

      --
      I hope you're not pretending to be evil while secretly being good. That would be dishonest.
    37. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FOX is nothing but a myriad of sleazy network executives.

      ...who don't give a fuck what you think. What do you think Fox is there for? Are they there to make money or are they there to make a small minority of atypical geeks happy? Maybe we should establish The Geek Charity Network, and only shows that YOU like will be shown. Who will pay for it? Oh wait, that was the trouble with Linux...

    38. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 0

      Whats wrong with greed-is-good?

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    39. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by dimator · · Score: 2

      Shit, I didn't know Family Guy was cancelled... that sucks a nut. There is officially nothing on TV that interests me now.

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    40. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude! its obvious you didnt watch it!

    41. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by taxman_10m · · Score: 1

      FOX sucks. They canceled The Lone Gunmen. They cancelled Space: Above and Beyond. They also canceled Brimstone.

    42. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by joekool · · Score: 1

      I have to ask--What did everyone think 24 was going to be? As soon as I heard the premise, I was pretty sure that it was a limited run series(24 episodes, see how that works?). I mean what would the next one be, another day in their life? Just doesn't seem very likely. Think about who is in it--Kiefer Sutherland, a movie actor, not likely to move to TV for long. I think that the reality is that they are doing what they intended, and people are reading into it a different meaning.

      --

      Slackware: old school feel, new school gear.
    43. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 'h' is silent, numbnuts.

    44. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      Release the HOUNDS!

    45. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by Valgar · · Score: 1

      All right, I've already got the URL, who do I need to torture/kill?

    46. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by MaxVlast · · Score: 1

      Right, sorry. I meant: That gnome gave me new respect for people of all shapes, sizes, and mutations. It's so good, it ought to be in the curricula of our fine schools.

      Sorry.

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    47. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, in French maybe.

    48. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by Cow4263 · · Score: 1

      get cable

    49. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by Atrahasis · · Score: 1

      "AN" is the correct word here. (as in "an historic occasion", "an heuristic", "an hospital") Just one of the vagueries of the English language.

    50. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by rtaylor · · Score: 2

      So, pull the plug on cable and tell your cable provider why.

      --
      Rod Taylor
    51. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by canadian+troll · · Score: 0

      dude, we don't need to see a show about the 80's... we were there! like fuck,if anything it should have been the crew from the 70s show in like 80's stylie.

      But, that would be some sort of lame 90210 type shite. they should have left it with the 70s and thats it. if there is a show about the 90's it will be damn boring.
      All jokes like nerds pulling their pud looking at Jennicam and Jenna jameson .Mpg movies.
      face it, the future, and the past are NOT funny.

    52. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I stand corrected, but the French are still to blame.

    53. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by ArnoldYabenson · · Score: 0
      , i wish i was cool

      I wish you weren't an AC. I would track you down man. Nobody contradicts my cartoon taste and lives.

    54. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you're anonymous... Oh, wait

    55. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by ibpooks · · Score: 1

      Family Guy was hilarious. It surpassed, by far, the over-played humor of The Simpsons while still not being as cynical as South Park.

    56. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by wysoft · · Score: 1

      Somehow, the thought of torture becoming a game show disturbed me.

      Remember the video game "Smash TV?" As I recall, the theme of the game was a futuristic game show where the contestents fought against droves of killer robots (not necessarily intelligent), and if they died, well then that's that. I could see such a thing happening very soon.

      --
      -- I'll cut you up so bad, you'll wish I'd never cut you up so bad!
    57. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct word here? This is an American website, in America, so speak American or go back to your gay-ass country where you can talk gay and wait until WW3 for us to come save your ass again.

    58. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by Your+Login+Here · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I wouldn't worry about family guy. It gets cancelled every year, but then they promise to behave and not get in trouble with the censors. So fox orders more episodes. Naturally the FG team ignores their earlier promises and does what they want. So fox cancels them.

      The bottom line is that they are still airing new episodes, and most of my friends watch it. At least they do when we can find them.

      Futurama OTOH has trouble reaching people who don't get all the sci-fi references. And some of the episodes suffer from too many jokes about the sixties (Nixon isn't that funny to people under 30). But I can always forgive a show that gave us the line "Woah, I think that hippie's kicking in".

    59. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by crotherm · · Score: 2
      I'm not one to flame, but the people at FOX are smoking something with strong hallucinagenic qualities.

      Ahh were that it were true. I mean what better way to enjoy Futurama, The Tick, Family Guy, etc. then smoking some fine hallucinagenics and a bag of cookies.

      Hmmmmmmmm Coookies.

      --
      "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable" - JFK
    60. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by dimator · · Score: 2

      Are you crazy? I used to envy people with HBO, what with all the cool movies, but now that I have it (for free, holster your flamethrower), I realize that it is roughly 96% garbage. The same movie 20 times a week, and the rest of the time, shitty shows like Arliss or Sex and the Whatever, not to mention the endless river of B movies no one has ever heard of.

      The other 4%? Cool shows like the Sopranos, and Band of Brothers. (And of course, Britney concerts in mute. :) )

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    61. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by SuperRob · · Score: 2

      I'm glad it got cancelled. The liberal use of epilepsy inducing strobe-lights was ignorant at best, and criminal at worst.

      My wife couldn't even watch the show without getting a headache. We liked the general idea (except for the fact that if THEY decided you couldn't take any more they'd pull you, no matter how much you protested), but the strobes made the show literally unwatchable.

    62. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by TaliesinWI · · Score: 1

      Hey, I've never completely forgiven FOX for cancelling _Profit_...

      It was kind of a double whammy though: the average TV viewer didn't have the attention span required to deal with 50 some-odd minutes of Machiavellian twists and turns, AND since the people who DID get it were running to the bathroom/fridge during the commercial breaks, I would guess that the advertisers weren't digging the situation either. I seem to recall it had the dubious distinction of largest negative change of beginning-to-end ratings of any show in recent memory up to that point: something like half of the viewers who were watching any given episode (already small) had tuned out by the 30 minute mark. Ouch.

      Not even sure it would have or would currently work on cable; the show actually used the commercial breaks to wonderful effect.

      Back to lurking...

    63. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many of these shows do you remember?

      All of them have been cancelled since 1998 by Fox.

      413 Hope Street
      The Visitor
      Significant Others
      Costello
      Getting Personal
      Damon
      Brimstone
      Milennium
      Harsh Realm
      Ryan Caulfield: Year One
      Action!
      Ally
      Ny Undercover
      American High
      Opposite Sex
      Time Of Your Life
      Greed
      The Street
      Normal Ohio
      Freakylinks
      Night Visions
      The Lone Gunmen
      The Tick
      The Chamber
      Pasadena

      Stupid fucking filter. Of course it doesn't want to fucking allow my fucking list because it's a fucking piece of shit system which tries to prevent crapflooding, but also drowns out actual signal. Fucking piece of shit Slashdot. This place really needs to convert to Scoop, a far superior News Engine.

    64. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Greed-is-good only works if you can align people's greed with that of the people who they're supposed to be working for.

      Enron's shareholders are probably not happy about the greed of the officers. Its their own fault for not keeping track of what their 'employees' are doing, but it certainly puts the "compensate officers with stock so they'll behave in the interests of shareholders" scheme in perspective.

    65. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's TWICE now. Let's spell it together. O-B-N-O-X-I-O-U-S.

    66. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      nice display of ignorance! what tribe are you then, my native American friend? Sioux? Tecumseh?

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    67. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by squaretorus · · Score: 2

      As our friend above reminds us with his Simpsons Quote there are two things that sell - sports and tits.
      Cartoons just dont have enough tits in 'em. Even SouthPark never has real tits in it. Now if Futurama had a mix of animation and gratuitous live action titty girls it would run forever.

      Just bolt 'Warning - this program is rated R - because of all the tits' on the front of any show to increase ratings 100% - they'd never over run football into that!

    68. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by Geeky · · Score: 1

      With or without the bees in their mouths?

      --
      Sigs are so 1990s. No way would I be seen dead with one.
    69. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by Phil+the+Canuck · · Score: 1
      Oh, come one. Think of all the original comedy that could come out of "That 90's Show."

      It's not a cell phone, it's a PCS!

    70. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by derrickh · · Score: 2

      CBS cancelled Brimstone. But yeah, Fox still sucks.

      D

    71. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by weinerdog · · Score: 1

      What the hell are they going to replace it with? Another "extreme" game show?!??! Another Survivor rip-off?! Maybe they'll show re-runs of Boston Public! Ooooh!

      That wouldn't surprise me. The networks must love (un-)reality TV. It seems to draw large numbers of viewers, and I'm guessing the kind of viewer they draw tends to be more susceptible to advertising than people who enjoy shows like Futurama that are a little more oblique and sophisticated. (Not everyone is going to understand a joke involving Al Gore, Steven Hawking, and Gary Gygax, but a surprising number of people seem to get wrapped up in the coached petty bickering of the survivors.)

      Not only that, but I suspect that these things are extremely cheap to produce. In a 1-hour TV drama, you have to pay a whole team of actors for every episode, but in survivor, they get 16 1-hour episodes or so and they only have to pay one person $1 million. Ted Danson made that for 1.5 30-minute episodes of Cheers; imagine what it would take to pay a whole cast of brand-name actors.

      Talk shows proliferate because people are willing to embarass themselves to entertain others for nothing more than the opportunity to be on TV and maybe a nice hotel room. Judge Judy is great because people volunteer to be berated by an angry old woman for a chance at fleeting fame, "justice" and a small settlement. Weakest link contestants take even more abuse for an even smaller chance at a cash award. How expensive can it be to follow some cops around with a handycam or have John Edward impress gullible people for half an hour with half-assed cold reading? No writers. No screenplay. No expensive and tempermental actors with expensive and embarassing drug problems. These shows are as cheap as they are popular. I would guess that even animated shows like Futurama have fairly high production costs, and they don't appeal to as broad an audience.

      --
      There's no such thing as Scotchtoberfest!
    72. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It shows that you're no fanboy, you can't even spell his name (Duchovny) right.

    73. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by Nullsmack · · Score: 1

      I had free access to all the major movie networks for a weekend and I'll tell you right now, it's the same way with all of them. I had free access to showtime for several years thanks to the cable companies' mess up.. and I knew that it sucked, but I didn't know the others did.

      I wish I could find a good direct connect hub catering to tv shows.. Online is the only place I can rely on to get all my favorite shows, since there are so few of them now.. and they are generally fucked over by the networks.

    74. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by PW2 · · Score: 1

      I am happy that they stuck with "24" even though it may challenge those with short attention spans also;

      I wonder how many DVD's it would take to fit the entire thing on (no commercials except 1 or 2 in the beginning...)

    75. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

      I know it' on Nick...

      Invader Zim: cancelled

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    76. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by Atrahasis · · Score: 1
      "American" is governed by the same grammatical rules as English - you may be a little creative with your spelling from time to time, but its still English.

      If you believe everything your government tells you about war, then I suggest you go here.

  4. Best of luck to you... by Teancom · · Score: 5, Informative

    But like the "Tick" guy said in his interview, the whole letter-writing campaign thing has been played to death. Especially when a show has been on the air for four years, you can't exactly expect the network to "just give it a chance to build an audience". If they haven't got their audience already, I'm afraid a couple hundred people writing and saying "but, but, it's cool!" isn't going to change their mind.

    *shrug* Sorry, but that's the way it is...

    1. Re:Best of luck to you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only a few hundred? The petition is being signed at slightly over one a second right at the moment, and is steadily accelerating. When I first looked at it, it was 2683, it is now 3445, and not slowing down. (using a stop watch and page refesh every thirty seconds.)

    2. Re:Best of luck to you... by VP · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I just signed - from the time I entered the site until I confirmed my signature roughly 100 more people managed to sign the petition (nice Slahdot effect in action :-). Your estimate of a couple of hundred people is already off by an order of magnitude.

    3. Re:Best of luck to you... by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2
      Personally, I would rather things end in their prime than survive as animated corpses. The X-Files has outlived its usefulness. The whole Star Trek franchise is overdue for euthanasia. The Simpsons, oddly enough, still seems to have some legs, but I don't know for how much longer.

      My attitude to these things is "let it go." The talent associated with the old series will find a new place to go, and often revitalize itself there. Writing and production teams get stale and insular if they don't go out and mix it up after a while.

    4. Re:Best of luck to you... by jd142 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It needs a decent time slot to get an audience. If they'd actually show the darn thing, people would watch it. Half the time it's pre-empted for either football or baseball. My suggestion is that fox never even try to have an original program at 6:00 central on a Sunday night. Just show a re-run on those few nights when there isn't some stupid sporting event.

    5. Re:Best of luck to you... by isoteareth · · Score: 1

      It doesn't have an audience because they (intentionally?) denied it one. In the time slot they gave it, it was not possible to watch it on the East Coast during football season.

    6. Re:Best of luck to you... by pete_townshend · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the already know that they have X viewers. If some fraction of X signs the petition, that still doesn't give them any incentive to change their mind.

      The problem is X is too small for them.

    7. Re:Best of luck to you... by Roto-Rooter+Man · · Score: 0

      You're right. The Invader ZIM and Family Guy petitions are immense, and they ain't coming back. It's worth heading over to the petition, however, if only to read the comment attached to #21: "Its the only thing that makes living in the UK bearable."

      --

      The goatse guy for president. Win one for the gaper!
    8. Re:Best of luck to you... by Teancom · · Score: 3, Insightful

      [This is in reply to both you and the AC]

      Electronic signatures mean jack-diddley. *Nobody* bases decisions on how stuffed an online petition is. The only way of getting their attention at *all* is physically writing a letter, licking a stamp, and sending it to the appropriate P.O. box, Hollywood, CA. Which brings me back to my original point, that the write-in campaign has been done to death. Psuedo-quoting the Tick guy, the studios realize that *every* fantasy/sci-fi show out there has it's fans, and you can be garunteed that they know with a reasonable accuracy how many of those people there are. So a letter from you saying that you like the show just isn't all that impressive. For whatever reason (crappy timeslot, lack of advertising, etc) the show isn't bringing enough eyeballs to the set, and it will be dropped, from *Fox*. IMNSHO, a *much* better campaign would be to pick a network (scifi, comedy-central, whatever) and target *them* with a letter writing campaign, urging them to pick up the show, and treat it right. I just have an incredibly hard time imagining Fox saying "Well, we *did* decide after four years this show just isn't working for us anymore, but now that we recieved a few hundred letters, we'll change our mind!" And, again, I stick by my "few hundred letters" theory. Personal experience tells me that one out of twenty people who sign the electronic petition will also write a letter (actually, that's being very generous, but oh well).

    9. Re:Best of luck to you... by RedWizzard · · Score: 2
      I had a look at some of the other petitions on that site. Save Family Guy seems to have about 10 times as many signatures as save Futurama. Any indication it's working for them?

      My personal favourite is this one.

    10. Re:Best of luck to you... by fleener · · Score: 2

      Running a show for 4 years with virtually no promotion (oh yeah, like anyone can remember the last Futurama commercial they saw!) and pre-empting it for sports events on a whim... well, it's amazing Futurama has such a faithful audience to begin with. Fox has put roadblock and roadblock in front of Futurama and I somehow still managed to catch it every Sunday (at least the Sundays when Fox actually aired it).

      The Comedy Channel or SciFi Channel better pick this puppy up.

    11. Re:Best of luck to you... by harvardian · · Score: 2
      I agree, and I am not impressed with the high rate of signing of this petition.

      FOX cancelled Futurama knowing that it was getting 7 million viewers just a few months ago (according to Nielson, google cache here). If 1 million dedicated viewers sign this petition, I don't see why FOX should care. Just because 1 million of those 7 million viewers are dedicated enough to sign a petition about the show doesn't mean anything -- dedicated viewers don't make FOX any more money than mildly interested viewers.

    12. Re:Best of luck to you... by spudnic · · Score: 2

      Trust me, electronic petitions mean nothing. I have had opprotunity to work with a couple of large institutions that have had web based petitions submitted to them for one thing or another (political). They aren't even looked at. It's too easy and the chance of fraud is huge. Even if they try to do email validation, etc., you just can't trust them. It's one man one vote, not one email address one vote.

      If you only care enough to fill in a couple of form fields and hit submit instead of taking the time to send an actual letter, you must not care very much at all.

      .

      --
      load "linux",8,1
    13. Re:Best of luck to you... by geekoid · · Score: 2

      because for every petionar there are at least 10 other viewers.
      I, of course, mean actual viewer as opposed to Nelson Viewers.

      The same goes with compaint letters.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    14. Re:Best of luck to you... by SocietyoftheFist · · Score: 2, Funny

      I wonder what kind of commercials appeal to somebody with enough time to sit with a stopwatch and refresh a page every 30 seconds and figure out what the rate of change on it is?

    15. Re:Best of luck to you... by ahde · · Score: 2

      um... that was me. libwww, don't you know?

    16. Re:Best of luck to you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...dedicated viewers don't make FOX any more money than mildly interested viewers


      Which is exactly why PVRs like Tivo are a Good Thing. If viewers could pay directly for shows they _really_ liked, and pay more if they were _really_ dedicated, everyone could see more of the programming they like best, and networks would make more money as well. It's a simple matter of increased economic efficiency.
      Except, of course, freeloaders swapping shows Napster-style would ruin the system for everyone eventually...oh well.
    17. Re:Best of luck to you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Males aged 18-25 are one of the most lucrative audiences, and Futurama is targetted directly at that. If a space cartoon show isn't bringing in that demographic, it really doesn't matter how many other viewers ("Nelson" or otherwise) it has.

    18. Re:Best of luck to you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what killed Space: Above and Beyond A really good show, but some exec hated it, and it was constantly being pree-mpted for football. The only way it was more certain to be cancelled was if they only aired it on the Arabic channel or something...

    19. Re:Best of luck to you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Nelson Viewers.


      Ha-Ha.

    20. Re:Best of luck to you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The Simpsons, oddly enough, still seems to have some legs..."

      Are you insane?

    21. Re:Best of luck to you... by baptiste · · Score: 0, Troll
      It needs a decent time slot to get an audience.

      Well that and it needs to actually NOT suck. Futurama IMHO was one of the dumbest shows I've ever seen. Sure it was funny the first time, but all I could think to myself was "Simpsons In Space" except not as funny

    22. Re:Best of luck to you... by Some+Dumbass... · · Score: 2

      But like the "Tick" guy said in his interview, the whole letter-writing campaign thing has been played to death.

      Funny, I though the whole "letter writing" thing was based on the known statistical bias built into the Neilsen system. Single 18-30 year olds don't have Neilsen boxes. Families of four do. So if you can prove that a valuable (to advertisers) demographic is actually watching the show, you might convince the network to keep it on the air. The point is to prove that an audience is there, but that they aren't reflected in the Neilsens. If we give those Fox execs something to show potential advertisers other than mediocre Neilsens, they might just be able to make some money by keeping the show on the air. Fox execs may be complete morons otherwise, but I'm willing to bet they know something about selling advertising.

    23. Re:Best of luck to you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if they get X^3 or so do you think it might sway them a little?

    24. Re:Best of luck to you... by cybermage · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My suggestion is that fox never even try to have an original program at 6:00 central on a Sunday night.

      Agreed.

      I think they'd do better to have Futurama share a time slot with Family Guy. The two shows combined could fill a whole season with programming where neither manages, or is allowed to, now.

      They could go one better and commit one whole hour a week for short seasons of niche shows. One week, show Family Guy and The Tick; Next week, show Futurama and _________. Next week back to Family Guy. Etc.

      Just put the hour somewhere in the schedule that isn't prone to being pre-empted. The current Thursday 8pm slot seems appropriate since their only chance is to couter-program the NBC sitcoms.

    25. Re:Best of luck to you... by istartedi · · Score: 2

      This is the whole problem with ALL network TV, not just Fox. STOP SHOWING SPORTS ON NETWORK TV. There. Said it. Showing sports on network is a hold-over from the days when there were only 3 channels. Nowadays most people have cable, and the people that really like sports and don't have cable have satellite. I can understand showing sports when it can be scheduled properly, such as football games shown between 12 and 4PM when there is nothing on anyway. But sports should not pre-empt regular network programming as if it were some kind of disaster like the coronation of "dictator of the United States" during a tornado while the city burns down after an earthquake.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    26. Re:Best of luck to you... by zerocool^ · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I know this is also a far fetched idea, but, how about if they *advertise* it??? I mean, I saw so many ads for that 80's show during the superbowl that it made me sick, and those were the 3rd generation ads for that show. Fox refuses to advertise The Family Guy, and they wonder why no one watches it.

      --
      sig?
    27. Re:Best of luck to you... by Teancom · · Score: 2

      Unfortunetly, I don't know you, so I don't know your background. You might very well be a long-time player in the television industry, with years of experience on how all this works. Well, I'm not and I don't. All I have to base my opinions on is a few interviews (with people like the Tick guy) and previous petitions set up for other, similar shows (Family Guy, The Tick, B5: Crusades, etc). And from every one of those sources, the message is: petitions don't matter. As another poster in this thread pointed out, the Family Guy petition has approx. 10x the number of "signatures" this one does, and I haven't heard even a whisper of "well, we're thinking about it". And finally, if you read my original post, you'll notice that I /implicitly/ acknowledge that the "letter writing" thing *used* to be effective: until it was overplayed. When you get a couple hundred letters *every* time you cancel a scifi/fantasy/geeky show, the ability to sway execs minds diminished. Advertisers will only accept "our neilsens suck but checkout our mailbox!" so many times before they start to yawm and look for other networks.

      Now, having said all that, (and with such style!) if you *do* have an "in" on how these things work, and I *am* flat-out wrong, please reply! This sort of things interests me, esp. the whole "behind-the-scenes" angle.

      P.S. I've always meant to checkout Futurama, but never got around to it, and if it's on the air longer, I would have that chance. But if not, you won't catch me writing a letter to my congressman B-)

    28. Re:Best of luck to you... by rmayes100 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that the networks don't even do a good job showing most sporting events. Let the cable channels like ESPN and Fox Sports show the sports since that's what they specialize in. Unfortionately this will never happen. Look how much the networks spend just to win the rights to a sporting event like the NBA finals, Superbowl or the Olympics. I doubt Fox will ever relinquish it's rights to the superbowl (without being outbid and how can the likes of ESPN compete with Fox) or NBC the rights to the NBA or the Olympics. So sports fans are stuck with mediocre coverage and crapy anouncers while network TV fans are stuck getting their favorite shows pre-empted or cancelled and the networks continue to line their pockets with money.

    29. Re:Best of luck to you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So Fox should replace the NFL, which gets 30-40 marketshare, with cartoons that get 5-7 share? And the NFL should be shown on a cable network where it can't reach 20-40% of the potential viewership?

      Thanks for the input, poindexter.

    30. Re:Best of luck to you... by Halcyon-X · · Score: 1
      There are many more things available to consider cancelling before cancelling Futurama (or even The Tick for that matter). I don't mean to troll, but take a look at FOX's lineup, and I'm sure you can come up with at least a couple of things worth cancelling in comparison to Futurama.

      For example, I'd rather watch Futurama than Temptation Island 2 (I'd even rather watch it than the Simpsons sometimes!)

      At least a promise of continuing Futurama after The Simpsons is gone would be good...

      --

      .sig: Open Source, Open Mind

    31. Re:Best of luck to you... by kincade · · Score: 1

      What's worse than the actual sporting event is having to wait for three or four has-been sports "stars" talk about the game/event that just ended. I was very close to canceling my DirecTV subscription because these morons spent 20 minutes spewing what amounted to "and did you see when that guy threw the ball and the other one caught it" before I could watch the Simpsons. When they're all off camera I'm sure they discuss "this one time at football camp"...

    32. Re:Best of luck to you... by NFNNMIDATA · · Score: 1

      I've seen maybe 2 episodes on actual TV in the last year (was there even a 4th season?) because the show is never on when I tune in to watch it. And I watch football, so I'm there at the end when the show would come on - it usually does not, and when it does it is a rerun. Meanwhile, we get more new-and-awful Simpsons episodes every week.
      The point:
      People would watch Futurama if they had a chance, what do you want us to do if not write letters and sign petitions? There is no chance to actually put more eyeballs in front of the show.

    33. Re:Best of luck to you... by dinivin · · Score: 1, Flamebait


      No body watches The Family Guy, not because Fox doesn't advertise for it, but because it's a bad show.

      Dinivin

    34. Re:Best of luck to you... by trapvector · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you're right.

      Let's find twelve million people who have never seen Futurama to sign the petition (which, btw, is riddled with errors and poor style... looks like some kid in junior high wrote it).
      capital idea.

    35. Re:Best of luck to you... by trapvector · · Score: 1

      you're damn right, freeloaders will ruin everything.

      i, for one, plan on freeloading until the day i die. or at least until the day i can pay my rent on time.

      it's not that i *wouldn't* pay more to see better TV... it's that i *can't.* hell, i don't even have cable. stealing episodes of family guy and futurama and whatever is the only chance i get to see them (no fox over the air here). i suppose that doesn't help the cause or anything... but at the end of the day, i can watch fifteen episodes of futurama all in a row, commercial-free. and i don't even have to wait until the day before MLB's all-star game for it to be on TV. ^_^

    36. Re:Best of luck to you... by matrix29 · · Score: 1

      IMNSHO, a *much* better campaign would be to pick a network (scifi, comedy-central, whatever) and target *them* with a letter writing campaign, urging them to pick up the show, and treat it right.

      Probably not Sci-Fi Channel. They just canceled "The Chronicle" so why bother urging them to get great stuff when they're canceling already fantastic programs?

      --
      "Face it, a nation that maintains a 72% approval rating on George W. Bush is a nation with a very loose grip on reality.
    37. Re:Best of luck to you... by M-G · · Score: 2

      And let's see...is "24" going to continue after the day is up? And they already show it twice a week anyway.

      And what about Dark Angel? The only thing it has going for it is Jessica Alba.

      Greg the Bunny looks like it may have some promise, but Andy Richter? Jeez...

  5. Petitions have worked before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I don't remember the entire history but America's Most Wanted was saved by petition. ABC dropped it, Fox picked it up, dropped it, and then brought it back after thousands of people wrote in complaining about the cancellation.

    The networks do care what you think - without you they have no one to sell ads to. Write in today!

  6. Burn out vs. Fade away? by mekkab · · Score: 1

    Its a shame to see it go...

    But was there any inidication? Were they going down hill? And of course the most important question: What on earth do they have that's gonna be better? Fear Factor with Hentai Anime?

    sheez...

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    1. Re:Burn out vs. Fade away? by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > But was there any inidication? Were they going down hill? And of course the most important question: What on earth do they have that's gonna be better? Fear Factor with Hentai Anime?

      Sigh, I'll miss Futurama - one of the few things I can be bothered to watch.

      But look on the bright side - if anyone ever does decide to cross Fear Factor with hentai, FOX will air it ;-)

  7. So is this why.. by schon · · Score: 1

    So is this why there's only been three episodes this season?

    *sigh* At least they still have Family Guy.

    1. Re:So is this why.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least they still have Family Guy.

      Family Guy was already cancelled back in January. Sorry.

    2. Re:So is this why.. by schon · · Score: 1

      Family Guy was already cancelled back in January.

      Huh? How come it's still being aired? I saw Episode 48 (European Road Show) last tuesday.

      http://www.tvtome.com/tvtome/servlet/GuidePageServ let/showid-348/epid-110012/

    3. Re:So is this why.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next season was cancelled back in January. They are still airing the shows that have already been created.

    4. Re:So is this why.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the Family Guy is not being renewed, either.

      http://www.damnyouall.net/cgi-bin/ikonboard/ikon bo ard.cgi?s=3c69aa0b4c2affff;act=ST;f=1;t=6

    5. Re:So is this why.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the last season.

    6. Re:So is this why.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have more episodes that they've already paid for and that have already been produced more than likely.

    7. Re:So is this why.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I have hear Family Guy has been cancelled as well.

    8. Re:So is this why.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Family Guy's been cancelled
      too..

  8. R.I.P by a_n_d_e_r_s · · Score: 1
    Well I will miss it if the show does not continue.


    Luckily here we are a bit after so it means I still have episdsdes that has not been aired yet.



    It is not impossible to get a tv series to be be resurrected - just look at Nikita who through a online campaign got extended.

    Bender you will be missed!!!

    --
    Just saying it like it are.
  9. NOT worth the trouble... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am sorry guys, but Futurama is not that great a show. Frankly its pretty stupid. I am a big fan of the Simpsons and most SciFi shows (except of course MutantX), but this show is just plain dumb. Good riddance.

    :P

    1. Re:NOT worth the trouble... by alexmogil · · Score: 1

      Well, whooptie shit, you've changed my mind. Tell me why I should have hated MST3k, now.Honestly if you're gonna post that bullshit, grow some and don't hide behind the AC, huh? I'm willing to lose a little precious karma over it.Then again, perhaps IHBT. Perhaps IHL.

      --
      A winner is you!
  10. Do you want to the Simpsons, but save Futurama by rizzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I loved the Simpsons in it's "prime" (circa seasons 2 through 7), but lately it has become tired and predictable. Futurama is laugh-out-loud funny and clever and ways that the Simpsons once promised but have stopped even trying to achieve.

    If you need to kill something Rupert, put the Simpsons to bed and move Futurama to the 8E/7C time slot. Having it at 7E/6C time slot is worthless considering FOX is a football network and football games never finish before then. I can't recall seeing a single episode that I actually sat at the TV waiting for.

    --

    "More organs means more human." - Zim

    1. Re:Do you want to the Simpsons, but save Futurama by DoasFu · · Score: 1

      Amen! If I hadn't had my moderation stripped from me for all eternity for replying to The Post, I would certainly mod this up.

    2. Re:Do you want to the Simpsons, but save Futurama by Da+Masta · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Agreed. After the "Who Shot Mr.Burns?" season, the Simpsons really began to suck, especially compared to other cartoons that began to show up, King of the Hill, Family Guy, Futurama, etc. It's time for FOX to kill the Simpsons, bring back Futurama and/or Family Guy, and make Malcolm in the Middle funny again.

    3. Re:Do you want to the Simpsons, but save Futurama by Doomdark · · Score: 2
      Yeah, Simpsons is a weird mixture of still some funny stuff, and then lots of very lame-o Disneysque "moral of the story" kid stuff. It's weird combination; if you want to do "moral" things, do your Mary Poppins; if rough and funny, do South Park. But do NOT try to mix the two. Simpsons is doing that, at least with new episodes (yeah yeah, not rough and funny just mildly amusing and just teeny-weeny bit naughty occasionally but still). :-/

      Of course it could be just matter of taste; those few X-files episodes I ever saw convinced me it's half-assed low-quality sci-fi-wannabe stuff more often found from paperback books (and "philosophic" semi-intellectual conversations comical)... but lots of people just love(d) the series.

      But anyways, Futurama is my favourite from Fox and a real pity if/when it goes away. They should rather axe Simpsons... before it gets even worse. :-)

      --
      I like paying taxes. With them I buy civilization -- Oliver Wendell Holmes
    4. Re:Do you want to the Simpsons, but save Futurama by bugg · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Everyone always says crap like this, but if you'll excuse me, I disagree.

      I've found the Simpsons to be consistently amusing since day one. Yes, they've had some episodes that aren't perfect, but overall the recent seasons have been great.

      The brand of humor is changing. Perhaps you people can't handle that. But recent episodes such as HOMR (crayon in the brain) and Trilogy of Error (The thumb / Linguo / Smuggled firecrackers) have been terribly enjoyable.

      Buzz off, Simpsons are still great, and for as long as they can maintain this quality I've got no complaints. I don't want to seem them stick around past their prime, but we've still got a few years until we need to worry about that, IMHO.

      One more thing- another response to your comment mentioned disney-esque morals in recent episodes? Huh? Are we watching the same show?

      --
      -bugg
    5. Re:Do you want to the Simpsons, but save Futurama by neafevoc · · Score: 1

      I agree!

      I also think they should bring Family Guy on Sunday's and drop King of the Hill! (I personally don't like King of the Hill... it just seems so dry compared to Family Guy and Futurama.)

    6. Re:Do you want to the Simpsons, but save Futurama by elefantstn · · Score: 2

      Sure, there are still good eps, but there are some truly atrocious ones as well. Beyond Blunderdome (with Mel Gibson)? What the hell was the point of that? The one about the body in the quarry this year? Totally pointless.

      You're right about the morals thing, though. I don't know what that poster was talking about. If anything, the middle seasons contained the largest amount of moralizing, whereas now the show is almost nihilistic. Not that the moralizing was ever overbearing, IMO, but to say that it's moreso now is a real strech.

      --
      If it ain't broke, you need more software.
    7. Re:Do you want to the Simpsons, but save Futurama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess that's why Futurama is getting cut and The Simpsons is staying right where it is, where its been for over a decade.

      Face it, with exception to a couple of episodes, Futurama sucks ass. If it didn't, The Simpsons would be getting cut instead.

      Oh well, good riddance to a mostly crappy show.

    8. Re:Do you want to the Simpsons, but save Futurama by Joe+Rumsey · · Score: 2

      Got to agree with you. There are many things from every single season of the Simpsons that will make me laugh out loud every time I see them (or just think of them... I wish Pinchy were here to enjoy this!) I do think it's past its prime, but I also think it's still way better than every other show's "prime". It's all relative, and The Simpsons is still my favorite show.

      On the other hand, I can't remember a single thing from Futurama that made me laugh out loud. I don't mean I've never laughed at it, just that I don't remember anything that funny now. I stopped watching regularly (but not entirely) a while back, which is why I'm not terribly disappointed it's going away. I mean, I'm disappointed in the sense that I'd cancel everything else on Fox's schedule before The Simpsons and Futurama (not that I can name much of anything else on their schedule - that's the point) but still not really upset.

    9. Re:Do you want to the Simpsons, but save Futurama by junkgrep · · Score: 1

      The main problem is that they are recycling jokes. How many times can they play off things like "oh, homer is fat! Ha ha, the chair broke cus he's fat!" They used to come up with creative sight gags, but now they're pedestrian and predictable. This is the problem with having basically two-note characters: after 12 seasons, and an inability to develop as characters, it just becomes a cycle of endless "what crazy thing will they get involved with next! Who's our big celebrity walk on?!"

      And the great social commentary? Gone gone gone...

    10. Re:Do you want to the Simpsons, but save Futurama by seanadams.com · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Simpsons are still great, and for as long as they can maintain this quality I've got no complaints. I don't want to seem them stick around past their prime, but we've still got a few years until we need to worry about that, IMHO.

      The Simpsons has changed ever so gradually over the years. They started with great characters that everyone could relate to. Then as they ran out of jokes that every family with 2.3 children could appreciate, they started to get just plain bizarre. Sturgeons falling from the sky, homer's chest being ripped open by a dog, etc. There's a lot of these useless gags creeping into the recent episodes, and I never thought I'd say this, but I'm actually getting tired of the Simpson's now.

      Futurama is what Groenings first animated sitcom would have been, had he not (presumably) been forced to give Fox something that wasn't so far out to begin with (See his Life In Hell books). The stories are damn funny, and the characters are ingenious (Zoidberg kicks ass). But what's different wrt the Simpsons is that this time there are no rules. You just couldn't have an egg sandwich causing a symbiotic worm colony in Homer's stomach, but it works great in Futurama. When you can pull off stories like that, you don't have to worry about ever running out of ideas.

      Anyway, no amount of petitioning Fox will increase the audience for this brilliant show. If you want Futurama to live, you need to get people WATCHING it.

    11. Re:Do you want to the Simpsons, but save Futurama by Miragejp · · Score: 0
      It isn't even football that kills it, since football is only 4 or so months of the year - it is all of the people who are watching 60 Minutes on that other channel. Fox should get a clue and put shows on at a time where the audience will be able to watch without having to decide which show they want to see.

      --
      In general, modern problems have medieval solutions...
    12. Re:Do you want to the Simpsons, but save Futurama by NFNNMIDATA · · Score: 1

      "You sir, are an idiot." - Krusty

    13. Re:Do you want to the Simpsons, but save Futurama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *cough* Comic Book Guy *cough*

    14. Re:Do you want to the Simpsons, but save Futurama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the Simpsons' joke about the Cisco server this past Sunday would re-endear the show to everyone on /.

      And the corpse episode was great! I love episodes that expand the backgrounds of the secondary characters. It was very "Stand By Me".

    15. Re:Do you want to the Simpsons, but save Futurama by trapvector · · Score: 1

      are you kidding? there's an episode from season 3 where these brains come and make everybody stupid. two of my all-time favorite tv moments are contained therein; allow me to poorly describe them for you.

      Morbo the News Monster is spinning around in his chair during the newscast... he gets all dizzy and falls down, and his sexy female coanchor laughs, "Hahahahahaha... you fell!" Morbo then pines about how he does not understand the letter T, "the one that looks like the little man with a hat."

      Fry is trying to use a megaphone to alert the citizens of new new york that they're all getting stupid; he's holding it backwards and shouting into the speaker, but doesn't notice until a bird lands on the microphone and pecks at it, creating such a storm of noise that it blows fry away.

      jesus. now there are people in the lab looking at me funny 'cause i'm laughing out loud right now.

      "The spirit is willing, but the flesh is spongy and bruised!" - Zapp Branigan

    16. Re:Do you want to the Simpsons, but save Futurama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      moral of the story

      Matt Groening said long ago that a defining moment of The Simpsons, in his mind, was in the Bart Gets an F episode, when Bart prays to pass his test. He says it made Bart a character, not just an icon of trouble-making. It showed he had soul and wasn't simply a caricature of naughty boys. Whatever people think the Simpsons is supposed to be like, Groening intended them to be realistic characters. While the nonsequitur, zany episodes are often hilarious, I personally find character-driven episodes to be the best, and the jokes that play off of the characters' personalities are often the funniest. So I liked the corpse episode, and the Buddhism episode, and even the Manjula episodes (well, the original one. Subsequent ones were kind of off-the-wall).

      If you want South Park, *watch* South Park.

    17. Re:Do you want to the Simpsons, but save Futurama by CentrX · · Score: 1
      Ok, so first you complain that The Simpsons is too bizarre, sturgeon's falling from the sky, homer's chest being ripped open by a dog... I can understand if that's not funny to you. Frankly, I find a lot of the bizarre and unexpected things in the show /very/ funny. If performed perfectly, something that doesn't make sense is still a gem.

      However, then you go on about how it's great that you can do bizarre things in Futurama. This doesn't make any sense. The Simpsons have been doing great with bizarre ideas, and pulling them off. I think you're letting your analytical side play with you too much, what with more normal (yet still not normal, it is another universe after all) The Simpsons being too bizarre to work, yet somehow Futurama bizarreness working. Frankly, it sounds just like a matter of taste, and frankly, the slightly off humor of The Simpsons is far more funny to me than the completely off humor in Futurama.

      --

      "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance." - Thomas Jefferson
    18. Re:Do you want to the Simpsons, but save Futurama by CentrX · · Score: 1

      Please clarify: What's wrong with mixing so-called "morality" (when it seems to me that it's almost mocking that type of moral story) with humorous (and yet still not potty humor like South Park) elements?

      --

      "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance." - Thomas Jefferson
    19. Re:Do you want to the Simpsons, but save Futurama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You just couldn't have an egg sandwich causing a symbiotic worm colony in Homer's stomach, but it works great in Futurama."

      What, you mean like the time Lisa created an entire race out of her tooth and some cola? Or the Guatemala insanity pepper trip-out? Sometimes The Simpsons uses tricks like that to provide a story, but Futurama does it all of the time. Thats just poor writers, since The Simpsons can be funny without the little gimmicks and Futurama is patently unfunny with all of the excuses they can use for any given situation.

    20. Re:Do you want to the Simpsons, but save Futurama by Joe+Rumsey · · Score: 2

      Nope, not kidding, and I've seen that episode. It is one of the better ones. But still not great. Here's some related Simpsons jokes for you. (and I do mean you, no one else is going to read a reply on a story more than a whole day old on slashdot!)

      Bart is on a school tour of the police station, and spots a wall full of megaphones. After pondering for a few moments, he has an idea. Cut to shot of 30 megaphones placed end-to-end, with Bart at the speaking end. A fly buzzes by, and the room starts shaking. Bart starts to say "Testing..." but only gets as far as "Tes..." before a shockwave spreads all over Springfield. The ringing doesn't stop until after Wiggum takes Bart home (and in the middle of one of Marge's lines).

      Homer is on board the space shuttle, and accidentally breaks open the ant farm. Back on earth, Kent Brockman sees an ant float close to the camera, and assumes that it's a race of giant ants coming from space to enslave us all. "Let me be the first to say, 'Welcome!' to our new ant masters!"

    21. Re:Do you want to the Simpsons, but save Futurama by Doomdark · · Score: 2
      For me what is wrong is that it doesn't work (btw, "wrong" as in "doesn't work", not as in morally wrong or such). Result is not funny; stuff that would either be funny (to me), or touching/realistic/whatever (for someone else... the "moral of the story" part) cancels out the other part. Like mixing oil and water (can be done like in mayo... but isn't easy).

      I find some satiric humour in Simpsons to be funny, but I find "we are good normal people after all" part to be cheesy. Just like happy endings ruin some movies; for movies were they fit nicely in they are ok; for movies that require different kind of ending they just spoil the whole thing.

      I just want my satiric humour pure; not necessarily/always sardonically sharp, but certainly not as watered-down "hey-we-didnt-really-mean-to-mock-em" version either.

      --
      I like paying taxes. With them I buy civilization -- Oliver Wendell Holmes
    22. Re:Do you want to the Simpsons, but save Futurama by Doomdark · · Score: 2
      Hard to argue with the author of the series about how things should be done eh? I kind of thought this was due to networks push for conforming nice family-valued entertainment... but if that's not the case I'm actually happy, even if I don't like the product as much as I would if it was produced differently. His show, them's the rules.

      Of course this probably explains a bit about Futurama having somewhat different direction... I find it more consistent (plus funny) because of its missing "realistic characters" department. :-)
      What Simpsons has going for it (more than Futurama) are the long-running character development sideline plots, and these are actually based on character traits... and often funny (gay theme for mr. Byrns 'n Smithers, relationship between the principal etc. etc), because they aren't pushed to the foreground too heavily. Just like all 'secondary jokes' in ZAZ movies (Naked Gun etc); things that shown alone wouldn't be all that funny, but combined add to the 'main course' nicely.

      --
      I like paying taxes. With them I buy civilization -- Oliver Wendell Holmes
  11. Futurama Cancellation by theRhinoceros · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A real shame that the Simpsons continues to be milked long past it's prime (let's not kid ourselves; Simpsons has been in a steady decline for some time now) while Futurama gets neglected despite a noticable superiority in both animation quality and humor (the recent Anthology ep, for example).

    1. Re:Futurama Cancellation by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 0

      You're already kidding yourself. The Simpsons continue to 0wn! wh00t!

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    2. Re:Futurama Cancellation by mgblst · · Score: 2

      god... if animation quality counted, all we would see would be southpark!

  12. could be another "The Critic" by theartist · · Score: 1
    For some reason I see this could become like the former primetime animated series The Critic that started on ABC then went to FOX then to Comedy Central and final to the Internet on Atomfilms.

    Of course there were other ones like Capital Critters (anyone remember that?) that didn't last long at all.

    Anyhow Futurama has had a hard time holding its own from the beginning. Some people attribute this to it not being done by Film Roman, the ones responsable for the work behind The Simpsons and King of the Hill, but I doubt that is it.

    I personally miss primetime animated series so I hope the petition goes through so everyone sign away :o)

    --
    --- Whasabi!
    1. Re:could be another "The Critic" by journalisticnut · · Score: 1

      If you do still want to see "The Critic" on actual TV, it does air on Comedy Central at midnight (Central time) Sunday nights.

    2. Re:could be another "The Critic" by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      let's spell it together! R-E-S-P-O-N-S-I-B-L-E

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
  13. Sunday Afternoon Football by Cheesemaker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think Futurama might have gotten more of a chance to build a fan base if it weren't always pre-empted by FOX NFL games.

    1. Re:Sunday Afternoon Football by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True enough. It would have also been better at the 8:30 timeslot. I mean Malcom in the Middle is the worst. show. ever! It is only popular because of it's timeslot. (right after the Simpsons) If Futurama had that timeslot it would have an infinitly larger fan base...

    2. Re:Sunday Afternoon Football by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 2

      It's not just that. Even when it gets a chance to show, it's still in a lousy slot. If they put it just after Simpsons, they'd have the ratings that they want. The way they have it set up, the show can't help but fail.

    3. Re:Sunday Afternoon Football by i7dude · · Score: 1

      i'm probably in the minority for liking to watch football, but you have to look at it from fox's perspective...face it, NFL Sunday has one of the highest viewing audiences, in order to keep their sponsors and contracts with the NFL they have to pre-empt other shows...and unless another show could possibly compete with the NFL they are gonna loose. i get tired of hearing people complain how the NFL interrupted their favorite show...you cant blame the NFL or sports for this...its the morons at fox who put the show there in that timeslot to begin with.

      dude.

    4. Re:Sunday Afternoon Football by Cheesemaker · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I can't knock the NFL over this, especially since there's so many better things to knock the NFL over. I mean, it's not college football, but at least it's still football. :-)

    5. Re:Sunday Afternoon Football by ArnoldYabenson · · Score: 0
      Don't you get it? You do not have to stop airing football in order to schedule a show at a different time than football.

      No one is denouncing your stupid full contact sport. In fact most of us are glad there is a place for homoerotica on television.

      We're just saying Futurama deserved a good time slot.

    6. Re:Sunday Afternoon Football by realdpk · · Score: 2

      What are these "slots" you speak of?

      I wonder if TiVo has any stats they could send Fox that might help show how many people actually watch it even with the crazy scheduling issues.

    7. Re:Sunday Afternoon Football by i7dude · · Score: 1

      "...you cant blame the NFL or sports for this...its the morons at fox who put the show there in that timeslot to begin with."

      yep i'm clueless.

      dude.

    8. Re:Sunday Afternoon Football by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 2

      Typically what you do to buoy up a show that you want to give a chance, is place it AFTER an already popular show. If you do this, people have momentum going into the new show. So, the ideal place for new shows on Fox is after the Simpsons, because people will decide to just leave the channel where it is. It's hard to get people to come and watch a show BEFORE a popular show, since very often, the popular show is the first thing that they're watching on that channel that night. You have to really convince them that changing is worth it. This is probably why 'The Family Guy' didn't do very well, as well.

    9. Re:Sunday Afternoon Football by curunir · · Score: 2

      Perfect way to convince the FOX execs...

      TiVo: look how many of our users watch futurama!
      FOX: how many of them watch the commercials?
      TiVo: ...

      --
      "Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos!"
    10. Re:Sunday Afternoon Football by ArnoldYabenson · · Score: 0
      Among the investors in TiVo are Viacom, Walt Disney, Comcast Corp., Cox Communications, Discovery Communications Inc., and Liberty Media.

      That's why TiVo does not auto-skip ads like RePlay does. That's why RePlay (SonicBlue) is being sued by Viacom, Disney and GE (which own CBS, ABC and NBC), and TiVo is not.

    11. Re:Sunday Afternoon Football by Datafage · · Score: 1

      Fine, there's nothing inherently wrong with showing sports, but they should keep the length reasonable and not consistently run out of the time slot, then blame the show in that slot for poor ratings.

      --

      Nicotine free Amish .sig.

    12. Re:Sunday Afternoon Football by junkgrep · · Score: 1

      What pisses me off about sports shows is the way they drag them out at the end and with mindless commentary. Sports commentary generally amounts to "hey, they played a great game! Hey, they played a terrible game! If only the other team had scored more points, they might have won! This puts their average at 3.5 for the 4th quarter 6 with a personal average of 8 career starter 8. But So and so really pulled together and played a good game and scored some points! Remember that compound fracture? Ow! That's GOTTA hurt!" And I simply don't see why this sort of drivel requires an extra 15 to 30 minutes at the end of a game, cutting out programing in which stuff actually happens.

      But then, I've never understood why anyone would watch sports instead of playing sports. Ooo: other people having fun that I'm too lazy to have!

    13. Re:Sunday Afternoon Football by LoseNotLooseGuy · · Score: 1

      and unless another show could possibly compete with the NFL they are gonna loose.

      I'm afraid you lost me here. What, exactly, would another show "let loose or release"? I would say that another show could fail to win in a ratings competition, but that is clearly not what you are saying here. If that were your meaning, I'm sure you would have used the word lose.

      Congratulations! You have been participant #32 in my campaign to rid Slashdot of this error.

      --
      Proudly correcting Slashdot's most irritating linguistic error since 2002.
    14. Re:Sunday Afternoon Football by i7dude · · Score: 1

      "I'm afraid you lost me here. What, exactly, would another show "let loose or release"? I would say that another show could fail to win in a ratings competition, but that is clearly not what you are saying here. If that were your meaning, I'm sure you would have used the word lose."

      honestly...thanks...seriously...i'm way to careless about shit like that...i meant lose.

      dude.

    15. Re:Sunday Afternoon Football by LoseNotLooseGuy · · Score: 1

      Very well, i7dude, you are forgiven. Go forth and err no more, lest you once again incur the wrath of LoseNotLooseGuy!

      --
      Proudly correcting Slashdot's most irritating linguistic error since 2002.
  14. Spell check... by Rothfuss · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not to be a picky little bitch, but if you are going to submit a petition to a major network begging them not to kill your favorite TV show, and then ask thousands of others to sign along with you, take a minute to run it through your spell checker.

    -Rothfuss

    1. Re:Spell check... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Flamebait? Has the responsible moderator read the petition?

      it has vast quantitiys
      fresh possiblitiys
      one of the most inivative, clever, funnny and entertaing shows
      left unfinnished
      If it was aired more routinely we are sure it would gain many more visitors, too.
      [visitors?]
      interupting


      I have a hard time seeing anybody taking anything written that way seriously. I'm not a native English speaker, but I had doubts putting my name under that drivel.

    2. Re:Spell check... by Rothfuss · · Score: 1

      Thanks, man.

      My jaw dropped when I saw the flamebait mod. Clearly s/he didn't even look at the petition.

      -Rothfuss

    3. Re:Spell check... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No worries.
      Now it seems like the petition author has fixed it too.

    4. Re:Spell check... by rtaylor · · Score: 2

      They want to show that they're average people. Average people cannot speel.

      --
      Rod Taylor
    5. Re:Spell check... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a supposedly computer hip crowd such as /. it seems to be incapable of using a spellchecker.

  15. In Memoriam by base3 · · Score: 1
    Whalers: We're whalers on the moon,

    We carry a harpoon.

    But there ain't no whales

    So we tell tall tales

    And sing our whaling tune.


    Every year, I'll sprinkle a drop or two of Mom's robot oil on the grave and reminisce. <sniff>

    --
    One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
    1. Re:In Memoriam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's it. I'm complaining to the Monsanto Corporation! Those goophy gophers have gone too far!

    2. Re:In Memoriam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm gona build my own amusement park! With Blackjack, and hookers! In fact, forget the amusement park!"

      -Bender

  16. Maybe it's for the best. by bartyboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Many good shows have been cancelled before. And maybe it's better that way. Once they reach their peak, they start to degenerate rather fast - just look at the Simpsons, which should have been dropped after season 7.

    Many other excellent shows have been cancelled before hitting their prime, (My So-called Life and Freaks And Geeks come to mind), but this isn't the case here - Futurama is terrific, and I don't think it can get any better, only worst.

    1. Re:Maybe it's for the best. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SHOULD HAVE BEEN DROPPED AFTER SEASON 7????????

      Flaimbait if I've ever seen it. May the Simpons go on ever....

    2. Re:Maybe it's for the best. by dildofire · · Score: 1

      come on. you really can't argue that the simpson is even half as good as it used to be. they never should have let conan o'brien leave...

    3. Re:Maybe it's for the best. by ArnoldYabenson · · Score: 0
      they never should have let conan o'brien leave...

      How many shows have his writing credit? As a producer, he was one of about a dozen "producing" credits.

      And he wasn't there that long.

      The Simpsons is still worth several good laughs every ep, and now and then they still turn out a transcendentally good one. I hope they stick around forever, even if only for the Halloween specials, which are good even when the show in general is in a slump.

    4. Re:Maybe it's for the best. by jo44 · · Score: 1

      My God! You wanna talk flamebait?

      The Simpsons SUCK now. I used to love the show. I thought it was the best thing on televison, by far. Around season 8 I started to get worried, but they still put out a funny episode now and again.

      Now the Simpsons is completely repetative. Homer is dumber than ever, and now so is Marge. The show can't go for 5 minutes without doing something that doesn't make ANY sense, mistaking retarded weirdness for offbeat witt.

      I can't even bare to watch the show now, it's such a formulaic product.

      I agree, I think the Simpsons should have been dropped long ago and they should have given that timeslot to Futurama, instead they jerked the show (Futurama) around and never let it build a solid fanbase.

  17. Zim by captainmoo · · Score: 0

    Why can't we do this for Invader Zim?

  18. oye by diggum007 · · Score: 0

    This petition won't do anything, and has some of the most atrocious spelling errors I've seen in awhile, but it's a nice effort. While I sincerely doubt that FOX will do more than glance at the top page before throwing it away, I have to wonder who's in charge of scheduling there. They've lost a lot of shows that had decent followings, and kept some absolute crap on.

  19. NFL vs Futurama by Link310 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've always enjoyed Futurama, that is when I got a chance to watch it. Unfortunatly, on the East Coast, if Fox is showing any NFL game, it will inevitably run over the time slot for Futurama. This happened even with the SEASON PREMIER. So, as far as I'm concerned, I didn't watch it because they didn't air it. I seem to recall the same thing happening at back home in Miami with a Time Cop show. I never got to see it because the local ABC affiliate decided they should talk about monday night football instead.

    1. Re:NFL vs Futurama by crow · · Score: 1

      Yup.

      With Time Cop, though, it was a syndicated show, so it was just your station, not the whole eastern half of the US. (And that show wasn't so great, IMHO.)

    2. Re:NFL vs Futurama by TheRealStyro · · Score: 1

      Frankly, since Fox ownes a sports channel the FCC should fine Fox for putting non-entertainment shows (that are best served on a owned niche channel) on the general entertainment channel.

      Course I also think Football is a really lame 'sport' since I've started watching rugby (padding? nope. stopping play for no reason? nope. insane level of rules and exceptions? nope. continuous play? yep. reasonably close to real-time-clock? yep. Teams that really suck ? one - USA)...

      --
    3. Re:NFL vs Futurama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HEY!

      We made the World Cup last time, therefore we do NOT SUCK! Just wait until 2003, we'll show those All-Blacks what's up!

    4. Re:NFL vs Futurama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US loves football for the same reason we love lawsuits -- arguing over technicalities.

  20. Slashdot live! by hyrdra · · Score: 2

    Pretty cool thing...you can see the Slashdot effect in real time. Hit reload and the signature #'s on the page increase by about 2-3 a second.

    --


    "I'll just chip in a bit for RedHat: I actually have that installed on my university machine." - Linus, '95
  21. Experiment by Platinum+Dragon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Perhaps FOX should switch the timeslots of Futurama and Malcolm in the Middle for, say, a month.

    FOX seems to have a history of trying to prop up weaker timeslots by relegating popular shows to crap times when no one is watching (or when everyone is watching other channels). Even the Simpsons got this treatment for a season or so, back when FOX didn't have as much strong programming to fall back on. The lack of good content to replace it on Sunday night at that time may be what saved the show from being cancelled; FOX just moved it back to the original 8 pm timeslot.

    If all else fails, perhaps the creators could see about getting the Comedy Channel or the Cartoon Network to fund and pick it up, something not unheard of for cult hits that get chopped by their original network.

    --

    Someday, you're going to die. Get over it.
    1. Re:Experiment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no but comedy central is cable, so they dont have as many viewers or as much ad revenue as the big time networks, so they wont fund it...they would just buy the reruns after it dies

    2. Re:Experiment by Platinum+Dragon · · Score: 1

      no but comedy central is cable, so they dont have as many viewers or as much ad revenue as the big time networks

      True, but unless the system in the U.S. is completely different, Comedy Central also receives subscription fees. Those can add up for a popular channel.

      --

      Someday, you're going to die. Get over it.
    3. Re:Experiment by zerocool^ · · Score: 2


      Perhaps FOX should switch the timeslots of Futurama and Malcolm in the Middle for, say, a month.

      I don't really mind Malcom. What I could really do without is the freaking King of the Hill. And don't flame me, I'm a southern boy (born and raised in Tennessee) - my dad *is* Hank Hill. I thought it was the greatest show ever the frist, say, 6 episodes, but lately it's painful to watch.

      Move Family Guy and Futurama to Sunday nite, and watch your ratings SOAR. Show FG eps after simpsons on weekdays (there's enough of them for a month or 2), and see how many people watch.

      ~!

      --
      sig?
    4. Re:Experiment by matrix29 · · Score: 1

      What I could really do without is the freaking King of the Hill. And don't flame me, I'm a southern boy (born and raised in Tennessee) - my dad *is* Hank Hill. I thought it was the greatest show ever the first, say, 6 episodes, but lately it's painful to watch.

      I enjoyed "King of the Hill" for its rational attitude and realist values. However, I've decided to no longer watch it as having Hank Hill describe George Worthless Bush as magnificent when it was obvious he was cocaine-snorting, drunk until 40 (and still drunk now), Enron-loving, Nixon-secretive (he released Clinton's documents, but refuses to release Reagan's, his own when he was Governor of TexASS, and his own double-dealing documents of today), constantly lying, broke every promise but the pittance of a "tax break", and up to his hairline in sleazy money. Hell Bush even prevented and obstructed investigations into Osama bin Laden before 9/11. Bush is a treasonous worthless ass who should have been rotting in prison decades ago (unlike Jeb Bush's daughter or Jenna & Babs Bush who can commit any crime and serve no time).

      If Mike Judge wants to promote a barely human piece of shit into crapping all over the Office of the President, he may. That is his right (until Ashcroft eliminates that part of the Constitution too). I will no longer reward him for it though. I see no logic in benefiting the allies of treason & tyranny. I now avoid "King of the Hill".

      --
      "Face it, a nation that maintains a 72% approval rating on George W. Bush is a nation with a very loose grip on reality.
    5. Re:Experiment by 4mn0t1337 · · Score: 2
      Wow! Talk about missing the point. Have you ever even been to Texas or meet the same style of chock-full-o'pride Texans as Hank Hill?

      IT WAS A JOKE!!! Like so many of the other jokes, it is a commentary on the character of this kind of Texan. They take pride in sharing the same citizenship (in Texas it is more than a residency -- they are Texans first, and "American" is a subset of the category "texan") with other figures.

      What is the name of Bobby's school?

      Why do people look down on Peggy?

      Why were the guys making fun of Hank and putting I(heart)NY stickers on his car?)

      For some reason you think the show is pushing some political agenda???

      Quick: What other Texan is hank's dog named for? What was the party affiliation?

      Quick: What ex-Governer showed up on the show? What party??

      Still think there are political motivations?

      IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE PERSON, OTHER THAN THE FACT THAT THEY ARE TEXAN.

      But you seem to be so blinded by your own agenda that you can't perceive anything but own narrow world view.

      NOTE: I am not indicating one way or another anything about the character of GWB. To understand it was a joke is independent.
      NOTE2: Nor am I saying the show is or is not funny. To each their own. But, I, for one am not so wound up in my own world that I can see it as an attempt a humor.
      NOTE3: Yeah, yeah, yeah: IHBT. TFP. HAND....

      --

      ______
      Once: you're a philosopher. Twice: a pervert.

  22. I blame sports by EddydaSquige · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If Fox didn't prempt it every other week for some game or another maybe it could get itto a groove that would make people watch all the time. How can you expect to develop a following if you only air the show once every other month. Constantly prempting a show is as bad as changeing its time slot 6 times over the season, and then blame a lack of rateings for the cancelation.

  23. Wow... by g00z · · Score: 1

    I have seen the same thing being said about Family Guy as well. What the hell is going on over there at FOX? I can only hope that the reason all these really good shows (Fox's only good shows in my opinion) haven't been renewed for new seasons is whomever job it is to renew shows is waaaaaay asleep at the wheel.

    I bet they're going to tell fans it's because of file sharing and 9/11. Sounds like a scummy network thing to do.

    --
    "The Wright brothers were the first to fly with a heavier-than-air machine, but boy did they have a lousy plane"
  24. d/l the episodes by lemonhed · · Score: 1, Informative

    I have all seasons on my computer (it took up many many gigs).

    www.lando.co.uk has the entire episode catalog for download.

    get em while its still up!

    1. Re:d/l the episodes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how bout the simpsons?

    2. Re:d/l the episodes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      avi???
      bah

      I have every episode on vcd :)
      16 cd's in all :)

  25. Ok, Redundant I'm sure, Sosumi by MaxwellsSilverHammer · · Score: 1


    Well, they can just Bite My Shiny Metal ASS!!!

  26. my fox affiliate by hyperstation · · Score: 2, Interesting

    doesn't carry Futurama unfortunately (i have no idea why, the simpsons and m in the middle are on every sunday)....so i've been missing out anyhow

  27. This cannot be allowed to happen! by Meowharishi · · Score: 1

    Futurama is quite simply one of the most intelligent, witty, funny, and creative animated series in the history of TV. If Fox is so stupid as to cancel this gem, I will promptly boycot all Fox programming.

    --
    mje0w!!!1!
    1. Re:This cannot be allowed to happen! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...er..sorry but...HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Thats the funniest thing I've read all week. Sure "boycott" Fox programming...HAHAHAHAHAHA! You honestly think they'll miss you? In case you haven't noticed, Fox is a network channel, meaning its *free* to watch anyways. You're still going to buy the products that are advertised on their channel, because they're advertised on all of the channels. Additionally, how many other people are going to *not* boycott Fox, because that where they watch The Simpsons and the various sporting events?

  28. Almost as Important... by Murdock037 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...Does anybody know how this would affect the planned upcoming DVD sets?

    Fox did pretty well for themselves by the Season 1 DVDs of "The Simpsons," and I remember rumblings that "Futurama" would follow not too far behind.

    It'd be a shame if these disappear, too; the commentaries on the Simpsons discs were as amusing as the shows themselves, and the Futurama crew has always struck me as being a bit sharper in their wit.

    At least Fox is still putting out quality programming like "That 80s Show" and "Temptation Island 2," right? I mean, right? Who's with me?

    1. Re:Almost as Important... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least Fox is still putting out quality programming like "That 80s Show" and "Temptation Island 2," right? I mean, right? Who's with me?

      Yo, no shit man. Temptation Island 2 was the bomb boyz. Those chicks were PHAT!!!

    2. Re:Almost as Important... by TheTomcat · · Score: 2

      The DVD is available at amazon.co.uk:

      Futurama Season 1 DVD

    3. Re:Almost as Important... by LordKariya · · Score: 1

      The DVD set (season 1) has already been released in Europe, but only in Europe. Haven't seen anything about a US release. They're pretty !

      As for that 80's show, holy crap.

      *Worst* rip-off ever.

      --
      I alternate between posting +5 and -1 Comments. Karma: +53 -47 = 6
    4. Re:Almost as Important... by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 1

      Was just checking out the link to Futurama Season 1 DVD, which is great if you live on that side of the Atlantic. Problem is, I can't seem to find it on the US version of Amazon. I wonder of they decided that the US audiance wouldn't want it. Course, for those of you in the UK, you might be able to fetch a few pounds by auctioning off a set or two to us underpriviliged Americans. I know I'd love to get a hold of this.

      --
      Necessity is the mother of invention.
      Laziness is the father.
    5. Re:Almost as Important... by Glytch · · Score: 2

      It's times like this that I'm glad I got one of the original Pioneer regionless dvdroms when I had the chance.

      But now I'm torn. Do I buy the DVDs and thus give FOX my money, or do I give FOX a big "Fuck You!" and deprive myself of Futurama goodness?

    6. Re:Almost as Important... by GooseKirk · · Score: 1

      I'm not into anime, so until now I never had a reason to bother hacking my DVD players. But with this and Northern Exposure only being available in Europe... what do they expect us to do?

    7. Re:Almost as Important... by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 1

      As for having a regionless DVD player, that is always a good thing. I recently obtained one, and am happy with the results.
      As for buying or not buying the DVD, I'd say buy it, sure it gives the FOX cronies money, but it at least lets them know that this show had some interest. It goes back to the whole voting with your money idea. If they are turning a good profit on DVD sales they might give the show another go, and maybe even a fair shake this time. Also, it might provide them with some motivation to back more shows like this one. Not buying is really just hurting yourself to be spiteful. 1. You don't get to have it. 2. FOX doesn't see money comming in from it, so they don't do more shows like it. So, buy it, its the only way to let them know that good comedy is what you watch. &ltrant&gt I just wish enough people with an IQ above 50 could get a Nielson box and finally get wresteling off the top spot in ratings. But I guess its a lost cause, the smart ones either don't watch much TV, or are too paranoid about the boxes. So we're relegated to having a bunch of backwater hicks, who are too stupid to realize wresteling is fake, making up our minds about what makes for good TV.&lt/rant&gt

      --
      Necessity is the mother of invention.
      Laziness is the father.
  29. Petition UPN! by malibucreek · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Don't just petition Fox. If they've made up their mind, they've made it up. Even if they decide to consider the show as a midseason replacement, the production company will likely let people go before that call ever comes.

    Instead, petition UPN to pick it up. They have a history of picking up other networks' shows (Buffy, Roswell, etc.) and this one would fit in well with its lineup.

    The address:
    UPN Entertainment
    11800 Wilshire Blvd.
    Los Angeles, CA 90025

    IMHO, this is the show's best hope.

    --

    Why is it called COMMON sense when so few people have it?

    1. Re:Petition UPN! by EddydaSquige · · Score: 1

      They didn't exactlly 'pick up' Buffy. They out bid WB for the rights, WB lost Buffy, not UPN picking it up.

    2. Re:Petition UPN! by malibucreek · · Score: 1
      True. But it shows that UPN's got no problem picking up a show that's been on another 'net. I'd suspect that'd be more of a political/corporate ego problem for a more established net. Just MHO.

      In this case, UPN could probably get a good deal on the rights, too, 'cause it is generally considered that you need five seasons' worth of a show to successfully syndicate it. And since that's where show producers make the bulk of their money, they're gonna be very motivated to find someone, anyone to pick up that fifth season.

      UPN could walk in and get a good show for a song.

      --

      Why is it called COMMON sense when so few people have it?

    3. Re:Petition UPN! by condour75 · · Score: 1

      rather than splitting the petitioning crowd in two, how about just sending UPN an email after the fact to show how many people want it kept on?

    4. Re:Petition UPN! by donglekey · · Score: 2

      When Family Guy was going to be cancelled the first time there was a huge push from fans that got it to stay. Now Family Guy is on the brink again and there is another gathering of fans. Sign the Petition! And picket if you are in the area.

    5. Re:Petition UPN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, I'd rather watch Futurama on FOX than Under Paid Negroes.

    6. Re:Petition UPN! by Matthew+Luckie · · Score: 1
      YES, thats a FANTASTIC idea, it'll be just like the submissions to the DoJ regarding microsoft, with the content primarily consisting of the not-very-insightful "I Hate Microsoft".

      Please don't go writing ANYTHING to ANYONE about this.

  30. too bad by Deanasc · · Score: 2
    Fox never gave this show a chance. Never in prime time and always pre-empted to finish a Nascar Race or Football game that ran over their slot. It's too bad. I really like this show.

    I won't lift a finger to help save it though. I leanred my lesson trying to save Mystery Science Theator 3000.

    You can't fight the man.

    --
    I've hit Karma 50 and gotten a Score:5, Troll... I win!
    1. Re:too bad by waster · · Score: 1
      You can't fight the man

      Damn the man. Save the empire.

  31. What about Family Guy? by d2htornado · · Score: 1

    Sure, raise a big fuss over Futurama. Family Guy (also on Fox, and a much funnier and much better show than Futurama) was cancelled and I didn't see jack on here about it. It's nice to know that the "journalists" on here take it upon themselves to champion the shows they find amusing while leaving other things conveniently unmentioned.

    --

    Linux is so bad it's free and most people don't use it. But you have the source code, so it's your fault.
    1. Re:What about Family Guy? by CurlyG · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well gee yeah that's incredible... people protest the closing of shows they like while ignoring the passing of shows that they don't like! What bias! How unfair! Boo hoo!

      ...and "The Family Guy"...? Just when exactly did you have your sense of humour surgically removed? Were the "All in the Family" reruns too heart-stoppingly chucklesome for you?

      --
      You know they call 'em fingers but I've never seen 'em fing. Oh, there they go.
    2. Re:What about Family Guy? by amhax · · Score: 1

      WHAT? When was the Family Guy cancelled? I LOVE that show. Fuck TV. I am seriously going to stop watching. First they make big deals about PVR's for us poor guys who work late hours, and then they cancel all the shows that PVR's helped me actually see?

      It is a cruel, cruel world.

    3. Re:What about Family Guy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      eat a dick. family guy is fucking hilarious. over your head, i guess.

      futurama's a waste of a timeslot, even for fox. get over it. it's gone.

    4. Re:What about Family Guy? by ArnoldYabenson · · Score: 0
      Family Guy? My dog has thrown up more entertaining shit than that.

    5. Re:What about Family Guy? by geekoid · · Score: 2

      No geek content in Family Guy.
      Tons of geek content in Futurama.
      This is a geek site.
      Now, I've given you the pieces, can you figure it out?

      There were a lot of save family guy sites.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:What about Family Guy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shh. Randy Newman's in the corner and he might hear you...

    7. Re:What about Family Guy? by neurovish · · Score: 2, Funny

      The difference is:
      Family Guy gets cancelled after every season

      It's kind of like their replacement for the season finale I guess.

    8. Re:What about Family Guy? by aka-ed · · Score: 2
      Funny you should mention that, as my cat's litter-box also rivals the Fox program Family Guy in entertainment value. What a coincidence!

      --
      I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
  32. whoa. by BenTheDewpendent · · Score: 1

    After you sign the petition go back to the 1st page and hit refresh a few time over a couple min and watch the counter go up. i watched it go from 3092 to 3192+ in just a couple minuets. can almost watch the slashdotting.

    1. Re:whoa. by ArnoldYabenson · · Score: 0

      Good idea. Don't just slashdot the server, uberslashdot it.

  33. PetitionOnline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find it very difficult to give much credibility to any sort of voice of mass opinion that runs through petitiononline. To be swayed by public opinion, I'd think that a decision maker would be far more impressed by a deluge of written letters, phone calls, signed stacks of papers, etc...not some guestbook-like site where the effort to create and spout off casual desires is negligible, and the result is a forwarded URL announcing the results that can be ignored in a heartbeat. Also questionable is the security measures in place to prevent multiple votes and unreliable results.

    That said, I'm pretty indifferent to whether Futurama continues. It was usually pretty funny, but never caught me in quite the same way the Simpsons still does. Don't know why.

  34. do petitions like this really work? by ledbetter · · Score: 1

    I'm sure FOX will be interested to know that there are lots of people out there who don't want the show to get cancelled. But are these people actually faithful watchers of the show? If there were really hoards of people watching the show then the ratings would reflect it, and it wouldn't be getting cancelled. And not to be particularly cynical, but will all these people who just signed the petition actually go watch it every Sunday for the rest of the season??

    When I read this I thought "no way, they can't cancel that show, it's great"... but I have to honestly say that I maybe watch it 1 out of every 4 or 5 times it's on...

    The way to petition for TV shows is with your remote, not your pen (or keyboard).

    1. Re:do petitions like this really work? by JoshDrmr · · Score: 1

      The ratings wouldn't reflect it with this particular show! Not at all! Why? Because it has been pre-empted by football nearly every week this season, due to it's crummy timeslot of 7 PM! This season only four new episodes have been aired so far. What's more, one of them (the season premiere of all things!) was pre-empted in many places and another one wasn't aired in its usual timeslot. All other airings have been reruns (pre-empted everywhere but the west coast). So of course the ratings don't reflect the show's popularity! It never gets advertised and it's hardly ever on!

    2. Re:do petitions like this really work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The way to petition for TV shows is with your remote

      Hate to break it to you, but that only works for "Neilsen Families"

      Regular people have no say in what's aired - unless they let the network know.

      - Or are you suggesting we all wait outside Rupert's house and pelt him with them when he comes out?

  35. WILL NOT BE MISSED by SanchieBoots · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Joining the shit heap of crap animation, including Family Guy, Clerks - The Animated Series and Dilbert. At least it might leave room for something worth watching.

    Matt Groening thought up The Simpsons in 15 minutes, moments before pitching it to Fox. Doesn't mean he could do it again.

    1. Re: WILL NOT BE MISSED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He thought it up 15 minutes before pitching it to Fox? Does that mean that it actually DIDN'T first appear on the Tracy Ullman show (http://www.simpsonschannel.com/content/articles/p ierce1.shtml) the way I always thought it did?

  36. Was Futurama was even on tv this year? by TheBishop · · Score: 1

    Funny, I think they only had what... two episodes this year? How can it get bad ratings when they never show it?

    1. Re:Was Futurama was even on tv this year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last episode of last season aired 13 May 2001. Since then, there have been FOUR new episodes aired - the last being this past Sunday.

      4 episodes in 9 months. Thanks a lot, PHUX, err, I mean, FOX.

    2. Re:Was Futurama was even on tv this year? by schon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How can it get bad ratings when they never show it?

      Thanks - you just provided insight into why it's been cancelled - so it can never get bad ratings!

      By cancelling it, they not only make sure that it never gets bad ratings, but they don't have to pay for it either!

      (I'm laughing as I write this, but it scares me that it just might be what's going through some Fox executive's head.)

  37. Cool Note by Kallahar · · Score: 2

    As of now the number of signers on the petition is rising at about 100 sigs a minute.

    Cool :)

  38. Quality, not quantity. by spt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So there's 4 seasons. Isn't that enough?

    Some of the best things come in small doses - take Fawlty Towers, for example, one of the funniest sitcoms ever, and they only made 12.
    John Cleese said he put everything it needed in those 12 episodes.

    If you can live with 'only' 4 seasons of Futurama, perhaps the writers will come up with something better.

    1. Re:Quality, not quantity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember when MST3K reached its fifth season. They had ads listing the few shows that had made it 5 seasons. There weren't a whole lot. And judging from Buffy and XFiles, even the best shows should seriously consider hanging it up after five.

      So don't be so upset, fans. Relish what you've seen, be glad it didn't have a chance to get stale, and enjoy the extra half hour you now have.

  39. Proofread and edit by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

    Please, have somebody go through and fix all the spelling errors, and generally edit the petition. It looks sort of sloppy.

    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    1. Re:Proofread and edit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      agreed, it needs fixing badly... it might do more harm than good for fox movers and shakers to get a monkeyfisted petition endorsed by ~5000 grammatically oblivious futurama fans. (did i spell all that right?)

    2. Re:Proofread and edit by Cow4263 · · Score: 1

      I don't think you could legally go through and edit a document after you already have 8k signatures. Granted, this is just a petition and it would be just be spelling fixes (presumbably) but it still would declare all signatures null and void.

  40. If you like the show so much ... by SuperRob · · Score: 3, Insightful

    WATCH the damned thing. Shows, even shitty ones, don't get cancelled if people WATCH them. If the show gets cancelled, it's because you aren't putting your viewing habits where your mouth is!

    I am as big a "fan" of Futurama and Family Guy as the next person. But when push comes to shove, there's other things on TV I'd rather watch more.

    That's why they've been cancelled. Fox needs shows that people will watch, and that means being BETTER than the stuff on the other two (three, counting CBS) networks.

    1. Re:If you like the show so much ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you don't know what a "fan" is

      so keep your fucking pie hole shut

    2. Re:If you like the show so much ... by imevil · · Score: 1

      It is damn hard to watch it when it nearly always gets preempted by football! I watched every episode of it, it was annoying to wait for an episode and get football or the last 8 minutes of the show.

      Fox may be teaching a lesson to the autors, or taking revenge on them. I cannot see another explanation to the fact that they have been trying to ruin the show for all this time and now they cancel it.

      If Futurama doesn't get cancelled this time, it's not for lack of trying!

    3. Re:If you like the show so much ... by Keith+Mickunas · · Score: 1

      I do watch it, thank you, and so do a lot of other people, when its on. Fox has killed it, not the lack of viewers. It would be nice if it was actually given a prime time spot, not this 6pm (Central) bullshit. Fortunately my Tivo picks it up for me so I never miss it. But not everyone has a PVR, so guessing when it might be on is a pain in the ass. How does fox expect it to get decent ratings if they don't show it at a halfway decent time?

    4. Re:If you like the show so much ... by kopper187 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      WATCH the damned thing. Shows, even shitty ones, don't get cancelled if people WATCH them. If the show gets cancelled, it's because you aren't putting your viewing habits where your mouth is!

      What good would it do if I watched the show? I don't have a Nelson box on my TV so how would FOX know if I'm watching it? (Which I do)

      The better solution, as others have pointed out, is if FOX had slotted Futurama after Simpsons or some other popular show (do they have any others?)

    5. Re:If you like the show so much ... by decipher_saint · · Score: 1

      But these shows don't fit into the new Fox demographic: nobody.

      --
      crazy dynamite monkey
    6. Re:If you like the show so much ... by Hal-9001 · · Score: 2

      And watching the show without some mechanism for the network (in this case Fox) to know that you're watching helps how?

      IIRC, ratings are based on feedback (collected by a device that figures out what channel you're watching) from a "random" sampling of television viewers. I say "random" because apparently these people watch shows like Millionaire and Survivor and Temptation Island that I just can't stand.

      --
      "It take 9 months to bear a child, no matter how many women you assign to the job."
    7. Re:If you like the show so much ... by shoppa · · Score: 1
      WATCH the damned thing. Shows, even shitty ones, don't get cancelled if people WATCH them

      Problem: for the last two months of the football season, here on the East coast I was unable to watch Futurama at all in its 7PM-on-Sunday timeslot. The football games always went past their scheduled end and Fox chose to not show Futurama at all here; instead

      These were mostly new Futurama episodes, too, dammit. whatever remaining time was eaten by pointless Football jabber.

    8. Re:If you like the show so much ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you like the show so much ...

      WATCH THE COMMERCIALS!

      And buy the products ...
      ohboy, another -1 for me... oh wait...

    9. Re:If you like the show so much ... by swoopx · · Score: 1

      I can't even remember how many times I searched on replay for futurama and had nothing come up.. Are you sure futurama wasnt canceled two years ago? I would watch it but.. its NEVER ON.

    10. Re:If you like the show so much ... by philglanville · · Score: 1

      Surely with a Nelson box, Fox would be aware exactly how much you'd been watching the show, because of the micropayment system built into your TV :)

    11. Re:If you like the show so much ... by SuperRob · · Score: 2

      Football is only on for a couple of months. Futurama's ratings have been shitty for FOUR SEASONS.

      Someone give me a better argument for why this show should stay on the air and continue costing Fox money. They put the show on after the Simpsons, no one watched. They put it on after football, no one watched. They put it back to back with Family Guy (another critically acclaimed, and seldom watched show), and NO ONE WATCHED.

      They've put this show in every time slot imaginable waiting for that vocal viewership to tune in, and it just didn't happen.

      I like the show, but not enough to watch it. Apparently, just like everyone else.

      As for the Neilsen ratings, that's bullshit. The Simpsons gets great ratings, and the viewership should be the same. The people watching the Simpsons just aren't watching Futurama or Family Guy. Blame THEM, not FOX.

    12. Re:If you like the show so much ... by kopper187 · · Score: 1

      Spelled Neilson wrong. Oops.

    13. Re:If you like the show so much ... by mgblst · · Score: 2

      ohh... the power those people with the boxes must feel.

    14. Re:If you like the show so much ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or else the actors leave. Or there are conflicts that aren't well known. Or sometimes shows are too expensive to produce.

      Shows are cancelled for dozens of reasons.

  41. What about Groening? by mini+me · · Score: 1

    Will he resurrect the Simpsons to what it once was?

    I hate to see Futurama go, it one of the best shows on right now. With the demise of Family Guy as well, all we have left is the Simpsons. I'd like to know what they have up their sleeve. They've cancelled the two best shows there currently is, so what will they replace it with?

    Probably more sports and primetime movies although I believe sports channels and movie channels should be the ones who supply us with that kind of TV!

    1. Re:What about Groening? by Colin+Bayer · · Score: 1

      Groening's already said that this is the last season. Kiss the Simpsons goodbye. :(

      --
      Want Linux games? HERE.
    2. Re:What about Groening? by MrFredBloggs · · Score: 1

      Lets hope theres an animated version of Life (or Work) is hell! The Simpsons was ok while it lasted, but its getting a little long in the tooth. Futurama didnt do it for me. Lets hope something new is just around the corner.

    3. Re:What about Groening? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope to god it isanother DATING/REALITY/COPS show!!!

      Oh please oh please oh please...

  42. Don't sign if you don't watch by skoda · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wonder how many people are signing the petition to save Futurama, who don't watch the show.

    Consider, best case scenario:
    - 80 gazillion people sign the petition.
    - FOX says, "Great Googly-moogly! We didn't know we had all these viewers. Keep Futurama on the air!"
    - Futurama stays on the air
    - After a year, ratings, surveys, etc. reveal that, as FOX originally thought, only 80 people actually watch Futurama.
    - FOX yanks Futurama.
    - FOX never listens to a petition again.

    If you are signing the petition, but have not and will not watch the show, you're really not helping.

    1. Re:Don't sign if you don't watch by Covant · · Score: 1

      Great Googly-Moogly indeed.

      I tend to disagree, the audience is there, we were just not counted because ti-vo!!

      --
      "Peace, Love and Apathy"
    2. Re:Don't sign if you don't watch by gargle · · Score: 2

      I don't see why people think that writing a petition will help - unless Fox is really stupid, they must already have a good idea of how many people watch Futurama. How will a petition change anything?

    3. Re:Don't sign if you don't watch by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

      "If you are signing the petition, but have not and will not watch the show, you're really not helping."

      You're forgetting something: The only time it actually helps to watch the show is if you have a Nielson box on your set. If you don't show up on the Nielson ratings, your opinion means squat.

    4. Re:Don't sign if you don't watch by shogun · · Score: 2

      Or how many of us have never watched Futurama or Family Guy on TV and only ever seen it from copies downloaded from somewhere?...

    5. Re:Don't sign if you don't watch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5 Insightful??? Come on! This is an obvious troll atempt.

    6. Re:Don't sign if you don't watch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FOX has absolutely no idea how many people watch this show.

      How can they? Do they spy on your house? No.
      Do they spy on my house in NZ? No.
      Do they spy on Australians? Mexicans? Spaniards? No.

      They are clueless... their best guess is a proportion based on a small sample, from a non-representative population to begin with (US citizens are not representative of the world at large is what I mean).

    7. Re:Don't sign if you don't watch by Banjonardo · · Score: 1
      unless Fox is really stupid

      *chortle*

      --

      -----

      Score 3? For what? Being wrong, at length? - smirkleton

    8. Re:Don't sign if you don't watch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never known anyone who had a Neilson box. I don't understand how it can be an accurate rating system. How do we know the Neilson people aren't lazy and don't just give out the boxes to the first people they come to until they run out of boxes? A damned Internet poll wouldn't be much worse than that.

  43. great idea! by cr@ckwhore · · Score: 2

    great idea!! lets slashdot the petition!

    --
    Skiers and Riders -- http://www.snowjournal.com
  44. That's ok by Enry · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Even when they do tell you it's on, you'll wind up watching about 20 minutes of post-game football followed by 10 minutes of Futurama "already in progress".

    They probably want the space for "that 90s show".

    1. Re:That's ok by XBoyAdv · · Score: 1

      You guys have to remember Fox gave Futurama a "better" timeslot for one season. The showed aired after the Simpson. After that, it went to its "regular" slot on Tuesday with no "competition." That killed Futurama and King of the Hills ratings so they moved it to the post-NFL slot the season after. Futurama had its chance. In my opinion.

    2. Re:That's ok by plague3106 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My problem is that king of the hill is so unfunny and painful to watch. So i watch Futurama (which i think is pretty good), then i have to sit through that bore of a show KotH to get to the simpsons. If it was right before (or after) the simpsons, i'd defaintly watch it more. But i usually would rather miss it and KotH and get into something good.

    3. Re:That's ok by Carnivore · · Score: 1

      Man, your fox station sucks! Mine (Gainesville, FL) just pushes the programming back by however much the game went over. I've never seen that before and it's great.

    4. Re:That's ok by matrix29 · · Score: 1

      Even when they do tell you it's on, you'll wind up watching about 20 minutes of post-game football followed by 10 minutes of Futurama "already in progress".

      They probably want the space for "that 90s show".


      I'd say that Matt Groening should find another network to run it on. FOX is ran and owned by pure assholes (FAUX NEWS is even worse but a shining example of pure corruption & shameless lying). Groening should be able to find a better network (just not the other asshole heaven ABC) perhaps even NBC.

      --
      "Face it, a nation that maintains a 72% approval rating on George W. Bush is a nation with a very loose grip on reality.
  45. Fuck Futurama... by squarooticus · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ...I just hope they don't cancel Family Guy, which is much, MUCH funnier. Futurama was always a show hanging onto the coattails of the once-incredible but now-abyssmal Simpsons.

    --
    [ home ]
    1. Re:Fuck Futurama... by dildofire · · Score: 1

      hate to break it to you, but family guy's gone too. (see rest of thread for details)

    2. Re:Fuck Futurama... by tabacco · · Score: 1

      Although I disagree with you about Futurama, I should point out that Family Guy was cancelled a couple of weeks ago as well.

  46. See also: by farnsworth · · Score: 4, Informative
    see also "X-Fry" and "X-Bender" http headers at http://slashdot.org

    HTTP/1.1 200 OK
    Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 21:29:08 GMT
    Server: Apache/1.3.20 (Unix) mod_perl/1.25
    mod_gzip/1.3.19.1a
    SLASH_LOG_DATA: shtml
    X-Powered-By: Slash 2.003000
    X-Fry: It's like a party in my mouth and everyone's throwing up.
    Connection: close
    Content-Type: text/html

    --

    There aint no pancake so thin it doesn't have two sides.

  47. No offense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But that show always sucked. Yes there were a few things like bender which made it occasionally funny, but overall compared to Simpons or Family Guy it was kinda lame. And believe me based on the people behind it I was as big a fan of anyone when it first came out, but it just never got that good.

    BTW how bad does Enterprise suck. I've been a trek fan for eons, and I just can't stomach their pale impersonations of former trek cast members. I especially hate the captian and his sidekick. They bring bad acting to new heights, and make me ashamed that I am a fan of Quantum Leap. They only saving grace was that hot vulcan, although their exploitation of her especially in that episode when she and what's his name had be "decontaminated" was just pathetic.
    Ugggh I can't believe I can no longer stomach my favorite show!!!!

  48. FOX... by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 2

    ...has a history of murdering its good shows (Family Guy, Futurama, Get a Life) while letting once-good shows languish (X-Files, the Simpsons, Ally McFucking Beal).

    People wonder why they're still the number 4 network; I don't.

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    1. Re:FOX... by linzeal · · Score: 1

      I love their over simplified and uber alles patritotic fox news shows. They are actually are more funny and disturbing than family guy or futurama.

    2. Re:FOX... by Wntrmute · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm convinced that the Fox network execs are completely incompetant. Let's take a look:

      Futurama: About to go.
      Family Guy: About to go.
      The Tick: Gone, and never given a chance, with one of the worst timeslots on TV, opposite "Friends" and "Survivor".
      24: Possibly one of the best TV dramas *ever*, and was in danger of being pulled until it had great success with the critics and at the Golden Globes.
      Titus: One of the funnier sitcoms on TV, had it's episodes cut.
      Undeclared: Another decently funny show, which also had it's episodes cut. Note that the creator of this show is pissed, as Fox already screwed around with him on "Freaks and Geeks."
      Grounded for Life: Another decently funny show, had it episodes cut.
      Dark Angel: A show that developed a cult following in it's first season, then was moved to Friday, a night during which it's target demographic *isn't home*.

      These are just off the top of my head, this season alone. I'm sure if I thought back to seasons past, I could come up with more. With how abysmal ABC's lineup is right now, you'd think they'd take advantage of it. (Yeah, I pay *way* too much attention to pop culture, so sue me. :-)

    3. Re:FOX... by LMariachi · · Score: 1

      What kind of stuff is Fox cutting from Undeclared and Grounded for Life? Tonight's Undeclared had a character getting loaded and flashing her tits at a bar, and last weeks GfL revolved around the teenage daughter stealing the dad's bag of pot, so I'm wondering what kind of stuff didn't pass muster with S&P. Both those shows are quite good, although they don't seem to have the mystifying Slashdot nerd-appeal of Family Guy, which I can't stand.

    4. Re:FOX... by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 1

      Dark Angel: A show that developed a cult following in it's first season, then was moved to Friday, a night during which it's target demographic *isn't home*.

      I think Fox knows a bit more about target demographics than you think:

      SimpsonsComicBookGuyVoice&#62>
      It's time for Dark Angel. I'm going to sit right here on the couch and pleasure myself.
      /SimpsonsComicBookGuyVoice&#62>

    5. Re:FOX... by nob · · Score: 1

      He means they cut the number of episodes they ordered for the season.

      --
      daed si luap
    6. Re:FOX... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think Fox knows a bit more about target demographics than you think:

      Indeed. The demographics are probably very similar to XFiles, which *started* on Friday nights, found its footing here, and remained there for 3.5 seasons.

  49. Defeatist attitude by Platinum+Dragon · · Score: 2

    You can't fight the man.

    I'm going to be half-serious here...

    Dammit, that's what The Man wants you to think! The Man wants you to just sit down, shut up, and take whatever you get fed. You're not supposed to stand up with others who agree with you and say you want something to change, or stay the same. That would be interaction - and Big Media can't have that, beyond what little scraps the plebes get thrown with "online polls", "bulletin boards", and stupid contests.

    Try, man! Stand up and try! MST3K fans may have failed, but that doesn't mean they'll always fail.

    Hey, a mass letter-writing campaign worked for Star Trek. I'm sure us Futurama nerds can come up with some contemporary equivalent.

    FIGHT THE POWER!

    --

    Someday, you're going to die. Get over it.
    1. Re:Defeatist attitude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that sig rocks.

  50. Hmmm, reminds me of the Simpsons. by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 1

    You know, the scene where Marge and Homer are sitting in bed, watching a television program with a porno soundtrack. Marge turns to Homer and says "You know, Fox became a porno channel so gradually, nobody realized what was happening."

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
  51. PLEASE use a spell checker. by msm1th · · Score: 0, Redundant



    "...the show has given us much happyness and joy..."

    "Many of us watch the show with friends and believe it has vast quantitiys of potential and has an almost never ending amount of fresh possiblitiys."

    "...one of the most inivative, clever, funnny and entertaing .."

    I mean, come ON. If a FOX exec reads this, he/she will think it was written by a bunch of semi-literate cretins and the petition will not be taken seriously.

    That said, I did sign the petition, and will be sad if Futurama is indeed cancelled.

    1. Re:PLEASE use a spell checker. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fox's target audience is semi-literate cretins ... so those signatures will probably garner more attention from the programming execs.

    2. Re:PLEASE use a spell checker. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "semi-literate cretins"

      sounds like Fox's target demographic to me.

  52. To quote the Simpsons. by Kenja · · Score: 2, Funny

    Fox turned into a hard core porn channel so gradually no one even noticed.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  53. Microsoft did this before. by _typo · · Score: 2

    So how is slashdoting an online petition any diferent from Microsoft rigging a poll? Slashdot is reaching new lows.

    (relax it's a joke)

    --

    Pedro Côrte-Real.

  54. Fscking Focks by felipeal · · Score: 1

    So it's going to get cancelled

    Actually, we could say the cancellation process is already there. They just aired 4 episodes so far in this season.

    I really can't understand Fox. Futurama is really good, it didn't get in the repititive/appelative stage where the Simpsons is ye (don't get me wrong, I'm a big Simpsons fan too, I just think it's time to pull the plug and move on to the big screen), and now they are cancelling it (while I bet the Simpsons will still survive for a couple of years). I just hope they don't cancel King of the Hill too..

    1. Re:Fscking Focks by felipeal · · Score: 1

      I really can't understand Fox.

      PS: forgot to mention, but Fox is really one of a kind. While it created some good shows (Futurama, Simpsons, X Files, King of the Hill, Dark Angel, 24, Malcom in the Middle, etc..), it also brought us a lot of crap (Who wants to marry a millionaire?, The Chamber, Who wants to be a princess?, The Alien's Autopsy, and so on...)

  55. wow by max.inglis · · Score: 1

    Between the time I first visited the page, and the time I finished filling out my info, it went from 3098 signatures to 3912. I hope this works, because I really enjoy the show ( although my wife insists I watch without her, its humour is apparently lost on her )

    max inglis

    1. Re:wow by k-rad · · Score: 1

      You can always email fox and tell them you hope it works.

      --
      --->----
  56. Another network? by crow · · Score: 2

    So how much does it cost to make an episode of Futurama, anyway? That is probably one of the key questions in determining if Cartoon Network or possibly Comedy Central picks it up.

    Also, there may be legal issues. Some shows are made by outside companies and can switch networks when contracts expire or are terminated (e.g., Buffy). Others are made by the networks themselves, and don't have a prayer of ever moving to a channel not owned by that network. Is there any confirmation that Futurama is produced under a contract that will allow them to go to another network?

    Just questions. Too bad I can't post the answers.

  57. Futurama's other problem... by DragonPup · · Score: 3, Insightful

    7 PM EST sunday night? Talk about a toss it and forget it time slot! Half the episodes get preempted(and cancelled for the night) by sports events, award shows that we don't care about, etc

    If you gave Futurama the 8:30 slot(currently in use by Malcom in the Middle, directly after the Simpsons), Futurama would do a lot better ratings wise.

    -Henry

    --
    "Useless organic meatbag" -HK-47
    1. Re:Futurama's other problem... by Banjonardo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but Fox can't give that slot up. Why? Because Malcom In The Middle kicks ass, thats why. Did you SEE the last episode?

      --

      -----

      Score 3? For what? Being wrong, at length? - smirkleton

  58. I will sound like a parrot, but here goes by forgoil · · Score: 2

    I guess I just wanted to write about it. I kinda had the feeling this would happen. I and many with me loves this show, but they haven't ordered more. I don't like many shows, and most I start to find boring before I come to the 10th episode. I still get all excited when there is a new Futurama out. I've seen them all, I ordered my Futurama DVD Box today (already got the Simpsons one of course) and I hunger for more. And this is what happens. I hope they move both Simpsons and Futurama to a nicer network, but I do wonder what will happen with the DVDs then.

    Life is unfair...
    -John

  59. What about King of the Hill by teslatug · · Score: 1

    How can Futurama be cancelled and King of the Hill be left on?

    They just need to get Futurama in a good time slot and keep it there.

    no more jacking on for Bender I guess

  60. I don't get it. by zook · · Score: 1
    It seems to me that a network makes a decision to cancel a show on economic grounds: they feel that they could make more money by running something else. Why would a network make a decision based on such a campaign?

    I mean, if you offered to pay them money (big money) to keep the show on, that would be something, but why is there any reason to believe that they'd keep a show just because some people ask them nicely? If enough people actually watched the show it would be a different story.

  61. Spellcheck The Petition Please! by GeekLife.com · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's dubious how much a network pays attention to these sort of online petitions, but it would greatly improve your chances if you spellchecked the petition first. And then have 10 people proofread it.

    happyness?
    quantitiys?
    possibilitiys?
    inivative?
    funnny?
    entertaing?
    unfinnished?
    interupting?

    And "Simpsons" should be capitalized as well. The networks probably won't listen anyway, but you might as well not give them specific excuses for discarding your petition.

    1. Re:Spellcheck The Petition Please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank god. A lack of professionalism shows how much some people really *don't* care about being heard.

  62. Here's the problem by vex24 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If Futurama is getting low ratings, it's for two reasons:

    1. Fox plays it at 7 PM. I'd always figured it would slip into the 8 PM spot when the Simpsons ended and quickly jump in ratings.

    2. Futurama viewers are not "average enough" to become Nielson viewing households. College students and Slashdot readers aren't "average" citizens. The "average" people are the ones that keep shows like "The View" and "WWF RAW" on the air. ;)

    --

    People shape laws. Not the other way around.

    1. Re:Here's the problem by Platinum+Dragon · · Score: 1

      1. Fox plays it at 7 PM. I'd always figured it would slip into the 8 PM spot when the Simpsons ended and quickly jump in ratings.

      Didn't it once run at 8:30, immediately following the Simpsons? I forget whether Family Guy or Crap in the Middle kicked it out and sent it on the Fox Death Journey.[0]

      Either way, Fox is finding ways to piss off more and more viewers with each moronic programming decision. The last one that made any sense was mercy-killing The Chamber. Prepare for a wave of crapcoms to fill time.

      [0] Start at the prime post-Simpsons slot, catch some smalll but consistent audience, then get sent to Tuesday, then get relegated to Sunday before the Simpsons, when everyone is eating dinner, still watching football, or getting something done before Simpsons.)

      --

      Someday, you're going to die. Get over it.
    2. Re:Here's the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Admittedly the early Sunday spot is crap (not just NFL, but it's up against 60 Minutes). But if it got crap ratings on Tuesday (or some other Random Night), then there's not much hope.

      Saying that the thing should run after the Simpsons is silly because that's pretty much the best slot that Fox has in it's entire lineup, and they wise to put something there with broader appeal (Crap in the MIddle).

    3. Re:Here's the problem by brettb · · Score: 1

      I have to agree with your second point.

      2. Futurama viewers are not "average enough" to become Nielson viewing households. College students and Slashdot readers aren't "average" citizens.

      We all know that ./ readers record their favorite shows on their (pick your favorite PVR) and then skip through all the commercials!
      That's all the Fox execs care about in the first place.
      I seriously doubt that a letter writing campaign by the likes of the slashdot community will have any impact whatsoever.

      Maybe all the letter writers should promise to not only watch the show, but all the commercials as well. Fox could verify this trend with Tivo et al and could at least say to their advertisers "We may not have the largest market share, but they are all very captive commercial watchers!"

      Heh.. yeah that'll happen.

    4. Re:Here's the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think WWF RAW are much farther away from 'average'.

      Actually both groups are similar, small but very passionate groups. Both are full of people who honestly believe they are better than any other group, and are quite suseptible to niche marketing.

      The difference is WWF doesn't exist on as large of network.

    5. Re:Here's the problem by tabacco · · Score: 1

      Errm... Explain how Fox will know by looking at a letter that the author is a college student or slashdot reader.

    6. Re:Here's the problem by anonymous+loser · · Score: 2
      Errm... Explain how Fox will know by looking at a letter that the author is a college student or slashdot reader.

      D43R F0CKS:

      1M 4 1337 81ZN355 3x3CU7iV3. PLZ D0N7 C4NC31 FU7UR4M4.

    7. Re:Here's the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the fact that they're bothering writing petitions, they must be a college student or a slashdot reader.

  63. Don't you people understand? by roystgnr · · Score: 5, Funny
    Fox just doesn't have enough room in it's busy schedule full of quality programming to squeeze in Futurama! Why, look at the Austin affiliate's jam packed lineup tonight:
    • The Teenage Sex and Drugs Hour (Formerly titled "That 70's Show" and "Undeclared")
    • 24 (Sure, there are rumors that this could go away and empty up an hour of space soon, but who knows: they could rename it "48" and surprise you!)
    • Fox 7 News at Nine (This takes up a whole hour, of course, because you just can't shave any time out of a local news channel and still preserve Fox's world-renowned reputation for journalistic depth and integrity. Tonight's banner headline from www.fox7.com: "Back pain can be excruciating!")
    • Um, er, well... that's it for current programming. But they surround it with four hours of reruns (allowing them to spend less on expensive new programming, and pass the savings on to you, the viewer!), "Fox 7 News at Five" (for the hour full of important breaking stories that just can't wait until 9), and the late night rerun of "Fox 7 News at Nine".

    And it goes on like that, night after night! Why would they want to air a clone of a successful Fox show like The Simpsons, when they can air "That 80's Show"? And have you seen the fan base behind "Grounded for Life"? You can't do a single search on Morpheus without tripping over DivX episodes of that runaway hit. And let's not forget the lucrative DVD revenues from "Titus"!

    Basically, there's no place for Futurama in the Fox lineup anymore. Saturday night is locked down with "Human Scum TV", craftily filling in the space between COPS and America's Most Wanted with COPS reruns! So what are they going to do? If only Fox was running three other humorous adult animation shows to fill out the rest of two hours, perhaps they'd be able to create some sort of thematically unified lineup, but where would they find three shows like that on short notice?
    1. Re:Don't you people understand? by Jonny+Ringo · · Score: 1

      You want to talk about a time burgler!

      I personaly blame that Malcom in the middle fucker.
      That little unfunny brat is in everything. Someone is putting to much money behind him. I can't watch fox for 5 minutes with out seeing his inoying face.

      ugghh, they need to take malcom in the middle out of the middle of the linke up.

    2. Re:Don't you people understand? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "* Fox 7 News at Nine"

      Well, that's your local statation (channel 7) and not the Fox network. Their news programming is far more profitable than the network stuff (like Futurama), BTW.

    3. Re:Don't you people understand? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to shove something up Malcom's frigg'n middle. I agree, that show blows.

  64. Typical Fox. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This seems to be a standard tactic of Fox's; put a show in a crappy timeslot, watch the rating plummet (or never go anywhere in the first place), then cancel it for the bad ratings.

    I would love to say that I've seen the Tick (live-action), but I NEVER saw an ad for it once the show had started; I saw plenty of "coming soon" ads, but NOTHING once it was out, so I never knew when it was on. Kinda lazy of me, I know, but most of the time I only turn the TV on when something good is on, and I don't have a TV guide or such.

    For that matter, anyone remember Space: Above and beyond? Totally kickass show IMHO, and they advertised the fuck out of it before it aired. But once it started, they started using a fucked-up random number generator to decide the times, EVERY WEEK. I only saw the first couple episodes, cuz they moved it around so much I couldn't keep track, forgot, or was given the wrong time by the TVGuide. Royally pissed me off, and the show was cancelled mid-season, IIRC.

    I'd love to say we can save Futurama, but I just don't think it's gonna happen; the almighty Network Executives(tm) have passed the decision, and it's gonna take an act of God to get them to change their minds.

  65. 2 cents by NiftyNews · · Score: 2

    Just putting in my 2 cents. Save Futurama. The more geeks that reply to this story, the better.

  66. +1, funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yep, that was funny, hopefully the karma whore mods aren't all browsing at 5

  67. So let me get this straight. . . by Betelgeuse · · Score: 1

    Fox is going to cancel Futurama and keep "King of the Hill" on TV?! This has long been a problem for me: how is it possible that "King of the Hill" has survived for all this time? My only explanation before was that it had a great time slot (between Futurama and Simpsons). But if Fox is now claiming that Futurama doesn't get good enough ratings to stay on, how is it possible that "King of the Hill" has managed to stay around?!

    --
    I couldn't tell if you were experimenting with poor-man's cryogenics or looking for the orange sherbet.
  68. 3rd Rock Stays?! by Un1v4c · · Score: 1


    Stop pitting Futurama against The Simpons and other cool shows.
    For crying out loud, if FOX ever had a wide open time slot it should be 3rd Rock's spot. Does anyone get that show?

    At the very least we can pray that it isn't replaced with yet another reality tv show.
    I'm still finding IQ points around the house just from the hearing the commercials.

    --

    I gave myself to Jesus, but now he never calls
    1. Re:3rd Rock Stays?! by Chris+Parrinello · · Score: 2

      Ummm... dude. 3rd Rock was cancelled last year. Not to mention that 3rd Rock was an NBC show.

      And Futurama and the Simpsons are both Fox shows. It would be a little difficult for Fox to schedule a show against another show on the same network.

      But don't let the fact get in the way of your rant... :)

    2. Re:3rd Rock Stays?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No dude, it's on every night after the news here, on FOX!
      I'd settle for re-runs...

  69. Great Show, but not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too many of the gags were only appreciated by a small number of people. While that makes it endearing to us, it goes over the head of Joe Sixpack.

  70. Very good point... by Pollux · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I honestly feel that part of the reason why Futurama hasn't built up a huge fan base is because FOX never gave it a chance.

    To start things off, when Futurama was created by Matt Groening, FOX was joyous. The Simpsons were a huge hit, and FOX thought anything else by the hand of Matt Groening would be just as big a hit...as long as it was just like the Simpsons. The problem was that Groening didn't want that.

    I wish I had remembered what magazine it was, but there was an article back in 1998 which explained the creation of Futurama. When Groening told FOX that it was either his way or no way, FOX was real close to saying no, but the ratings they were getting from the Simpsons was too good to let go. Even then, there was a lot of clash between FOX and Groening in the development of Futurama, mostly because FOX wanted a Simpsons knockoff.

    When Futurama hit the air, guess who first watched it? Simpsons fans, and pretty much ONLY Simpsons fans, because FOX advertised it that way. "From the creator of the Simpsons..." was emphasized more than "A New show...". Many Simpsons fans who were expecting a knockoff stopped watching it when they realized it wasn't, and many others left because they wern't used to a different kind of comedy (Simpsons had the same problems during the first two seasons, but they won it out).

    Well, when you have a drop in the original fan base, and no increase in a new fanbase, ratings fall. When ratings fall, the show gets preemted for shows with higher ratings. The third season of Futurama didn't start until the second week of November, and this season didn't start until the third week. Even then, we've only seen four-or-so new episodes, since as Cheesemaker said, NFL has otherwise preemted Futurama.

    FOX is making a big mistake if they cancel Futurama, especially because they just haven't made the effort to promote it to new people (rather than just Simpsons fans). When I visited Norway last summer, I found out that many of the teenagers (at least in southern Norway) love Futurama, even more than the Simpsons, because Fry's character reflects that of a typical 20th century high school kid.

    Just for the record, I hope everyone realizes that each decade has at least one show that the TV execs thought was a failure, but instead became a big hit in syndication. The Brady Bunch made it only through five seasons, Giligans Island only survived for three, and need I remind everyone that Star Trek only sailed the skies for four?

    My only wish is that FOX doesn't give the same fate to Futurama.

    1. Re:Very good point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno -- I always though Futurama _was_ a Simpsons' knock-off, except with less interesting characters (exception being the robot) and 2x more nerdy.

      My guess is that they need a reserve of jokes if they are going to try to keep the Simpsons on the air for another 10 years. Most of the stuff Futurama did could be adapted into a Simpsons script.

    2. Re:Very good point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I watch TV, I don't bother channel surfing at all, I just believe everything my corporate masters tell me. If it's not advertised, it must be crap. The tv guides are a waste of time.

      Thank you to the men in suits, who do all my thinking for me.

      spot the sarcasm.

    3. Re:Very good point... by ArnoldYabenson · · Score: 0
      Most of the stuff Futurama did could be adapted into a Simpsons script.

      Yeah, just like Hamlet could be adapted for a Gilligan's Island ep (it was a musical ep ... To be or not to be/That's what I ask of me).

      Sorry, not. I can see Bart becoming a super over-achiever by cheating (which he's done) but not from a bad sandwich infected by intelligent bacteria. And just as Lisa!=Leela, Nelson!=Fry. Give me one goddam example of a Futurama plot that would make a Simpson's (non-Halloween) episode.

    4. Re:Very good point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but I have to post this anonymously as I don't want to be moderated off-topic.

      Slashdot Commenting Study

    5. Re:Very good point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about Bart becoming a super over-achiever by taking Ritalin? Or is the bacteria part essential for your masturbatory rituals?

      BTW, try some of Ritalin - you might get your karma positive someday.

    6. Re:Very good point... by ArnoldYabenson · · Score: 0

      Try posting under your real name...you may get a backbone someday.

  71. Andy's show should kick ass by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

    its the dude from Conan.. it should be worth cancling futurama for.

    --

    --

    WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    1. Re:Andy's show should kick ass by ArnoldYabenson · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I'll bet its as good as George Costanza's show was. Or even Emeril's.

    2. Re:Andy's show should kick ass by night_flyer · · Score: 2

      and greg the bunny... problem is, like futurama and company, they are also "edge" shows

      --


      Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
      Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
  72. Petition seems to be going well... by kilgore_47 · · Score: 1

    ...in the time it took me to "sign" it, the count went from 4099 to 4214. And in the time it took me to go from there to here, and post this, it's gone to 4368. I mean 4379. I mean 4387.

    --
    ___
    The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason. --Ben Franklin
  73. A Different Plan for Futurama by johnstewart · · Score: 4, Funny

    Don't cancel it, just rename it to match the other fine, fine programming on FOX.

    Some potential winners:

    - Temptation Spaceship 5
    - When Aliens Attack
    - Who Wants to Marry a One-Eyed Woman?
    - Bender in the Middle
    - That 2970's Show

  74. Blame the docusoaps? by /ASCII · · Score: 1
    I've never followed a docusoap, but aside from beeing rather annoying they never seemed to do much damage. But an awfull lot of shows have been cancelled lately. The Tick, Futurama, Rugrats and Voyager.


    Might there be a connection?

    --
    Try out fish, the friendly interactive shell.
    1. Re:Blame the docusoaps? by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Yes, the connection is called "a recession".

    2. Re:Blame the docusoaps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YES! They need more time for commercials so now they are spreading a single 22 minute show over the course of one hour.

  75. Question by NiftyNews · · Score: 2

    Just to be rational, I'd like to know two things:

    1) What is the highest total of online signatures a TV show has recevied on this or similar websites.

    2) Did it matter?

  76. Maybe we should send the petition to... by zazylawy · · Score: 1

    Microsoft. They could ask all their employees to sign it a few hundred times each. Surely this is more important than some crummy online survey!

  77. Well sir. by antisocial77 · · Score: 1

    There goes my will to live. What the hell am I supposed to watch now, not having cable and such? Andromeda? Yeah, right.

    1. Re:Well sir. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, they are turing Andromeda into Three girls, two guys and a engineer fight a bunch fuzzy aliens that live on a planet/ship type thing. They changed Trance into a less-cute more sexy character... like beka and rommie weren't enough already.

  78. No great loss by hyacinthus · · Score: 2

    I watched "Futurama" for a while. I have to admit that it was (usually) funnier than "The Simpsons" was at the same time. (But, let's face it, my old college roommate after a few beers is funnier than "The Simpsons" has been in the last few seasons.) And sometimes, usually when it was making fun of some current or not-so-current event, it achieved a cockeyed kind of greatness (e.g. the _Titanic_ parody, or the episode where Bender does a Joe Hazelwood, only by not drinking.)

    But "Futurama" was a mean, nasty little show in comparison to "The Simpsons" at its best. "The Simpsons" in its early seasons was wicked, but it never lost sight of the essential humanity of its characters. Homer was dumb and often small-minded, but he'd occasionally come through and do the right thing. Lisa was there to remind us that even the worst of families can sometimes produce something right. Hell, even Bart had his moments.

    But "Futurama" had nothing but contempt for its characters. Fry has never been anything else but an idiot. Bender is...well, Bender; if he ever deviates from his cruel, mean-spirited ways, it's for the sake of a cheap joke. Leela provides some counterbalance, I suppose, but more often than not the show seems bent on finding some way to humiliate her (qq.v. any episode with Zapp Brannigan, the "Married with Children" parody episode.)

    Hey, but if you get your kicks from cruelty masquerading as comedy, then you'll be sorry to see "Futurama" go. I won't be.

    hyacinthus.

    1. Re:No great loss by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Speaking of the Simpsons, I've been groaning (or is it Groening?) at the weakness of the Simpsons scripts for the last year at least. I get the feeling that Matt G has put the Simpsons in the hands of others so he could work on Futurama and it shows. The series (Homer's char especially) has become extremely cartoonish (yes, I know it is a cartoon). The problem with that is that good comedy always has a way for the viewer to connect to it and sympathize. The plots though have become more and more bizarre and illogical and Homer's character less sympathetic. Violence (Homer getting beaten or doing the beating) and pop culture references are being used as crutches in lieu of good writing. Compare, say, the Simpson's Halloween "Zombie" episode to a new one. It had logic within it's framework, a few good pop culture references, great jokes, and a human Homer. Now Homer is just a bizarre freakish character, like the kid in class who made wierd noises out of a desperate need for attention.

      I think it is time to do what Seinfeld did and let it die gracefully before someone has to pull the plug on the Simpsons also.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    2. Re: No great loss by Nuroticat · · Score: 1

      hyacinthus, I understand where you're coming from. But if anything, your "cruelty masquerading as comedy" comment is more descriptive of the new Simpsons episodes than anything else. If The Simpsons were still living up to its standards, I would choose it over Futurama in a heartbeat. But the torch has been passed. Fry is a 25 year old version of the sweet, well meaning dope of a guy Homer used to be. Humanity isn't really Futurama's schtick, but I urge you to check out the season 3 episode "The Luck of The Fryrish" if you haven't already. It gives Fry a bit more of a backstory, and has made me cry on several occasions. This was the episode that made appreciate the full potential Futurama has to offer.

  79. Why in the world is anyone surprised? by immanis · · Score: 1

    I love Futurama. But let's face it, Fox has blundered into their best business decisions. For every one series or idea Fox gets right, there are 10 to 20 financed from the profits that fail in their first month. There are no big brains at work at Fox Networks. Sure, they got a couple things right in backing a couple wildly popular shows. But even a blind hog gets an acorn once in a while. Or in this case, a million blind monkeys at work on a million typewriters can produce the entire Fox fall lineup.

    1. Re:Why in the world is anyone surprised? by Aexia · · Score: 2

      >>Or in this case, a million blind monkeys at work on a million typewriters can produce the entire Fox fall lineup.

      What do you mean "can"? They *did*.

    2. Re:Why in the world is anyone surprised? by bonzoesc · · Score: 2
      Aexia had this to say about Robocop:
      What do you mean "can"? They *did*.
      Wrong - 10 monkeys, 10 minutes.
  80. The Family Guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The Family Guy is another very hilarious Fox show, and apparently they are canceling it too. If you want to sign a petition go here.

  81. Bad News, Everybody! by jeffehobbs · · Score: 1

    (i just wanted to use that subject line.)

    ~jeff

  82. Move along folks by dbrower · · Score: 2

    let me be the wet blanket that says Futurama should be let go quietly. It was past it's due date, and well, sometimes you have to let go.

    -dB

    --
    "It if was easy to do, we'd find someone cheaper than you to do it."
  83. I'd watch that... by Nanite · · Score: 0

    Futurama is cool and all, but I'd rather watch the 'Fear Factor with Hentai Anime' thing.

    n

    --
    God is real unless declared integer.
  84. Let me get this straight... by ArnoldYabenson · · Score: 0
    You are a "big fan" of "most sci-fi shows" yet you call Futurama stupid!?!!?? Are you the guy they based "The Rain Man" on or something?

  85. Pasturama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Futurama has never been as subtle or subversive as The Simpsons in its prime - especially the Conan O'Brian years. However, The Simpsons' last few seasons have really slipped.

    And why is King of the Hill still on? Does Fox have an ownership stake? Do they make money on syndication? If they gave Futurama the 7:30 slot, then KotH would have been NFLed to death instead. It seems like that show was done animated just Mike Judge wanted to. Live action would have worked as well.

    Futurama's just damed funny. I laugh out loud every time I think of Dr. Zoidberg's homeworld's national anthem (LOL as I type).

    P.S. Damn Fox and the NFL!

  86. Everybody Press Reload by Covant · · Score: 1

    The power of a swift slashdotting will become omnipresent!

    Watch the total number of signatures increase by the hundreds!

    Amaze your friends!

    --
    "Peace, Love and Apathy"
  87. OT: Family Guy Has Been Cancelled For Next Season! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It Seems Most ./"s have No Idea Family Guy Has been cancelled For Next Season. Fox Is airing what it has Left. Check out http://animatedtv.about.com/ For more info.

    As a Side note: Family Guy was always Much Funnier IMHO. Im alot sadder to see that go than Futurerama

  88. bbc! by labratuk · · Score: 1

    I know they dont have the money really, but it would be great if the bbc could buy the episodes. I would always watch. Plus there would be no adverts. (In the UK, the simpsons and futurama are on various different channels, and on the channels with adverts the episodes get edited to hell. We've lost some of the best jokes that way.)

    --
    Malike Bamiyi wanted my assistance.
  89. Here's an Idea for a Filler by halo9 · · Score: 1

    Bring back Beavis and Butthead :) hehe

    1. Re:Here's an Idea for a Filler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's not. I was a die hard B&B fan back in the day, but it really went into the toilet (in the BAD way) towards the end. Compare "Killing Time" to anything before it, for example.

      Around the time of the movie, they were recycling videos from old episodes. After the movie, they had a few more new episodes with the formula changed - 3 story segments and NO videos! What a crock.

      I'll keep my pre-Oct 93 (fire ban) tapes and happily live in the past, thanks...

  90. spelling would be a good start by sqweaky · · Score: 1

    "When we found out that the show has been cancelled we were surprised because there is a huge fan base for the show and it has a large online following too. Many of us watch the show with friends and believe it has vast quantitiys of potential and has an almost never ending amount of fresh possiblitiys."

    Fox would probably take the petetion more seriously if it wasn't written so poorly. Run-on sentences, typographical errors, and misspelled words take away credibility from an otherwise noble cause.

    --
    "They have computers and other weapons of mass destruction" -US Attorney General Janet Reno
  91. Synchronicity by Platinum+Dragon · · Score: 1

    I was eerily reminded of the gameshows like those in 'The Running Man.'

    You know, I almost said the same thing in my first reply, but I figured the reference wasn't quite exact. In the Running Man, the contestant could at least fight back and run. "The Chamber" was more like a 1984-esque Miniluv interrogation scene writ bizarre. I half-expected the host to offer the poor woman a roast beef sandwich with mustard during a break in the torture.[0]

    What ever happened to the other torture show, The Chair? Cancelled as well?

    [0] Ok, let's see who can identify that obscure reference.

    --

    Someday, you're going to die. Get over it.
    1. Re:Synchronicity by Cruciform · · Score: 2

      I'm trying to remember all the torture scenes in movies and that one seems to evade me... damn.

      I liked how they beat Sean Penn's character around with the phone book in 'Falcon and the Snowman'. Best use of 'Reach out and touch someone' I ever saw. The guy he was playing was such a jackass.

    2. Re:Synchronicity by RollingThunder · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Reservoir Dogs.

      I still get the shivers from the song they played during it, "Stuck in the Middle With You".

      An interesting analysis on that I found when doublechecking the song title:
      http://www.redstone-tech.com/gerry/res_dogs.htm

    3. Re:Synchronicity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Sheridan's interrogation in babylon 5. Too easy :)

    4. Re:Synchronicity by RollingThunder · · Score: 2

      That's Babylon 5, isn't it? When the interrogator is working him over on Earth.

    5. Re:Synchronicity by RollingThunder · · Score: 1

      Whoops, misunderstood the poster I replied to... originally read it as wanting reference to powerful chair-based torture scenes. :)

    6. Re:Synchronicity by amuro98 · · Score: 1

      If you read the book 'The Running Man', they have some "throw away" references to other gameshows of the time. One of which involved putting a man with a heart condition onto a treadmill and asking him trivia questions. If answered the questions correctly, and didn't fall off the treadmill (or otherwise fall over), he'd win healthcare for life. Unfortunatly, he had a heart attack, and only got the consolation prize - a free burial.

      (ob 9/11: why hasn't anyone arrested Stephen King for writing about a plane crashing into the network skyscraper?)

      Obviously, both The Chair and The Chamber aren't designed to kill or otherwise injure their contestants...but I figure it's only a matter of time...

      If the networks think sex sells, wait'll they find out what live violence does to their ratings!

      (btw, is that a roast beef sandwich with yellow or brown mustard..?)

    7. Re:Synchronicity by Suppafly · · Score: 2

      (ob 9/11: why hasn't anyone arrested Stephen King for writing about a plane crashing into the network skyscraper?)


      well, for 1 it was Stephen King who wrote a book similar to what happened on 9/11
      for 2, the author that did did so because its was a common theory that the future of warfare would go that direction.. there are numerous books on terrorist activities that discuss such a possibility.

    8. Re:Synchronicity by zaffir · · Score: 1

      I couldn't bring myself to watch all of that scene. I no longer enjoy that song.

      --
      "Upon attaching the waterblock to my penis, I began to notice that I know nothing about computers." -- JRockway
    9. Re:Synchronicity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, besides, everyone agrees it's the fault of the guy who wrote PGP (or maybe Dungeons and Dragons)...

    10. Re:Synchronicity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Stephen King dies in his Maine home yesterday. Duh! Do you even read Slashdot?

    11. Re:Synchronicity by Eccles · · Score: 1

      I believe it's a reference to Sheridan's torture in Babylon 5.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    12. Re:Synchronicity by Eccles · · Score: 1

      Whoops, didn't scroll down far enough to see that someone had answered it correctly.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  92. i couldn't give a hoot. by Hooya · · Score: 2, Insightful

    i hate tv. if you tape one of these shows and watch it in fast forward you'll know what i mean. 30 minutes show means 20 minutes of ads and 10 minutes of what is on the tv guide. no thank you. that's why i don't bother with cable/satallite/what-have-you. just news please. recently i've even stopped watching the news even. it's nothing short of cliffhangers full of sansationalism -- "an area women gives birth to seven headed green baby; news at 9". or "investigative reports!! 25 lifers are on the loose -- your life may be in danger -- news at 10". if my life was in danger, i'd really fucking appriciate them telling me now. who knows i may get my throat slit before 10. what a bunch of retards. TV has become an updatable billboard that people pay to get into their homes. someone's gonna have to pay me to get one of these things into my living room.

    1. Re:i couldn't give a hoot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "what a bunch of retards"
      Your spelling says a lot about your intelligence as well.

  93. DVD releases? by claud9999 · · Score: 1

    any rumours about a DVD release of the episodes?

    (Considering Simpsons first season was released recently...This would be an excellent thing for those of us who want to re-live the best moments.)

    1. Re:DVD releases? by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      I'll start one if you like.

    2. Re:DVD releases? by jt007 · · Score: 1


      First series already released if you are in Europe (or have a multi region DVD player). See this link for details As for a region 1 release, I dont know! OffTopic a little I know but: If anyone has this have a look at the easter eggs : on the main menu of all three discs you can select something in the background (for example on disc 1 it is a flying car is I remember right) that lets you view some spoof tv and film posters. V.Funny!

      --
      I never apologise, I'm sorry but that's just the way I am - Homer
  94. Written by /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The petition was obviously written by someone from slashdot, have a read:

    the show has given us much happyness and joy

    Spell checking is still too hard for some people that it must take away their "happyness".

  95. Karma Suicide!! by jeffy124 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    After 600+ posts and 20 articles, my karma has been peaked at 50 for what seems like forever now. My new campaign: Karma Suicide!! Every post from now until my karma's back at zero will be this short crapflood posted with my +1 bonus. So moderators: Do your worst! Mod me troll/flame/OT/Overrated/Whatever to get my karma back to where it began. Do this ASAP! And as for the rest of you, commit karma suicide today!

    --
    The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
  96. OMG! by labratuk · · Score: 1

    Come on, Futurama was easily as funny as The Simpsons, with added nerdy jokes which slashdot type people would get!

    --
    Malike Bamiyi wanted my assistance.
  97. I did my part by bartle · · Score: 2
    A few weeks ago when the Nielsen people called at an inconvenient time and hounded me about doing a survey, I agreed to it. For those that have never done a media survey before, they are an annoyance. The burden is on you to keep a log and mail it out, every once in a while you'll get a phone call to make sure you're keeping up on it. It's a real intrusion into your life with no immediate benefits other than the few dollars they send to guilt you into doing your journal.

    I felt it important to do because my tastes are not mainstream and if I don't make my interests known no one will cater to me. I did watch Futurama on Sunday night and it did go in my little log. I bring this up because I wonder how many Slashdotters watch Futurama, enjoy Futurama, but blew off a similiar caller because they didn't want to deal with the hassle or privacy issues.

  98. Two Words: Comedy Central by thepooleboy · · Score: 1

    I signed the petition, but perhaps what Futurama really needs is a network that will actually give it a chance, instead of giving it a shitty timeslot and pre-empting it at every oppourtunity. The Simpsons did not magically become the longest running, most popular sitcom on TV! It took years of promotion, network support, and character development. Unfortunately though, you can't sell a product that you don't believe in.

  99. Re:OT: Family Guy Has Been Cancelled For Next Seas by andymoe · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    That's because it sucks ass...

  100. online petitions.. by MathJMendl · · Score: 3, Funny

    To be quite honest, while I love shows like The Family Guy and Futurama, I question how much petitions like this do. True, they gave it a terrible timeslot, but the real "petition" is to watch it (although without a Nielsen box it doesn't do much).

    I mean, looking through the petitions on petitiononline.com, we see:

    1337 sp3ak in 5(}{00l !!

    A petition to the WWF in honor of the Undertaker
    Let's Import Japan

    A bit hard to take this seriously, especially considering how little effort it takes to sign a petition. A bigger noise would be made by sending postcards, that would fill their mailboxes.

    --


    "I have not failed. I've simply found 10,000 ways that won't work." --Thomas Edison
    1. Re:online petitions.. by VP · · Score: 2, Funny

      The scariest thing is, the WWF petition has much less spelling errors than the Futurama petition...

    2. Re:online petitions.. by Skirwan · · Score: 2

      For those philistines among us who don't regularly read Penny Arcade, the petition to import Japan is best explained here.

      --
      Damn the Emperor!

    3. Re:online petitions.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a joke about "Phatasy Star Online" and you are calling other people philistines!?

    4. Re:online petitions.. by daeley · · Score: 2

      ...much *fewer* spelling errors. ;-)

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
  101. I haven't seen Futurama on TV in 2 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't believe that Futurama has been on and people haven't been watching it. They stopped showing Futurama where I live halfway through the second series. I've had to get it off the 'net.

  102. There are ways a petition CAN be effective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well that depends. If there are enough letters that threaten to boycott fox entirely that may have the effect of reducing ratings across the board for fox. For a struggling network every point does count. Of course people organizing a boycott like that would be acting very unfairly towards fox.

    Another possibility is that an online petition can suggest ways of improving the show in order to attract a broader audience. That may also make fox change its mind.

    Also, a petition can show that a particular show has a faithful following, and replacing it with something else may be risky. That is, who's to say that its replacement will be any more popular?

    -Johan

    1. Re:There are ways a petition CAN be effective by NewSegway · · Score: 1

      FORGET THE PETITION! OK, you want to get something done? Get people who work for FOX involved. Goto fox news, then click on the Fox Links page, then find your local affil. What should you do next? It's simple. Write them a nice email, dont go in bashing them saying "Yo FuX0r, eye wi|| HaX0r JeW" or anything else like that. Tell them they are making a mistake etc.... SimonL

    2. Re:There are ways a petition CAN be effective by jt007 · · Score: 1


      For those interested here is a link that will let you find your local FOX affiliate.

      --
      I never apologise, I'm sorry but that's just the way I am - Homer
  103. Another Network by scyta1e · · Score: 1

    Oh, come on. I get like 800 channels on digital cable. There's got to be like 60 cooking shows on right now. If Groening wants to put in the effort for less money he can definitly sell this baby to Cartoon Network or the SciFi Channel(they even picked up Earth Final Conflict without realizing it had not yet died). But i kinda think he's too greedy.

    1. Re:Another Network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are dumb tom

  104. leela by ainsoph · · Score: 4, Funny

    who else thinks Leela is sexy?

    1. Re:leela by PhuCknuT · · Score: 1

      Not me, but if I were a cartoon I'd bang Amy.

    2. Re:leela by NaturePhotog · · Score: 4, Funny

      Eye do! :-)

  105. What a Load of Shit by Corbin+Dallas · · Score: 1

    Slashdot, you suck. I don't care how this is modded.

    I submitted almost this EXACT TYPE OF NEWS STORY about Family Guy ( Which is 100% funnier than Futurama ) and I got rejected so fast I still have the skid marks on my ass.

    At the time, I figured that it was because Family Guy isn't technically a geek thing ( by some people's standards ). And now I see this. Bleh.

    For those of you out there who *DO* care about Family Guy, you need to see the petition located here. You can also get info on snail-mail and pickiting here.

    PS - Futurama isn't BAD, I just don't find it nearly as funny.

    --
    Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.
    1. Re:What a Load of Shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God, that was funny. I don't know if you meant for me to laugh my ass off for 5 minutes or not, but I sure did.

      Best Family Guy ever had to have been the one with death banging the dead girl in the back seat.... sick, sick humor...

      Good stuff :)

    2. Re:What a Load of Shit by dinivin · · Score: 2

      Futurama isn't BAD, I just don't find it nearly as funny.

      It's not our fault that you have no sense of humor.

      Dinivin

  106. The Comic Book Guy Says: by hyyx · · Score: 1

    Worst, cancellation, ever!

  107. To quote the Simpsons: by thermostat42 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "You know, Fox turned into a Hard core sex channel so gradually, I didn't even notice."
    - Marge

    --
    no comment
  108. online petition.... by canning · · Score: 2
    maybe we should sign up in shifts, I don't know how popular we'd be if we slashdotted their server.

    --
    I love the smell of Karma in the morning
  109. OT: Name That Reference! by Platinum+Dragon · · Score: 1

    Here's a hint; it wasn't a movie.

    --

    Someday, you're going to die. Get over it.
    1. Re:OT: Name That Reference! by Cruciform · · Score: 2

      Hmmm, it was... oh wait, I offered that guy a bagel after I hooked his genitals up to the crank phone in my field pack. So it wasn't that.

      Was it a Monty Python skit? Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition! I never did see that one in completion.

  110. Can this work? by wwwgregcom · · Score: 1

    Well look to the past, the original star trek was canceled for years before the many letters of fans ressurected it. I doubt however, that a web petition will mean anything, writen letters have a much better chance.

    --
    What signature defines me as a person?
  111. assinine show by cutterjohn · · Score: 0, Troll

    THERE IS A GOD! That assinine show, otherwise known as Futurama has BEEN cancelled!

    Is there any reason why this extra-moronic show should NOT be cancelled for anything else?

    even the grass growing show would be better! woohoo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    --
    --- C00l .signatures please apply within...
    1. Re:assinine show by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Testify, brother!

  112. Argh! by labratuk · · Score: 1
    Come on, put it back or I'll have to pretend my son is dying!

    Wait.... ...wrong show.

    --
    Malike Bamiyi wanted my assistance.
  113. Please! Have mercy! by Monkey · · Score: 1

    I will promptly boycot all Fox programming
    By doing this you will surely crush their empire!!

  114. What show? by 0vi_king · · Score: 0

    Umm....let's see here.

    Football is the reason that futurama is being cancelled. The NFL stomped on the show like 10-11 weeks in a row.

    Some of use NEVER even got to watch it.

    I only got to see it just this LAST Sunday. Every other week it was some football game running into "false overtime".

    If the audience isn't allowed to see the show, how can we support it? e.g. watch the silly commercials in between...?

    --
    - Life is what keeps you occupied while you are waiting to die
    1. Re:What show? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn. Preach on! It's too bad were not the ones in power. Wait a second! We are!!!

      Unionize the IT industry (include the networks) and just say
      'Fine. Preempt Futurama on Sunday for football, but don't expect anything computer related to be working anywhere. BWWWWAAAAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!'

      Heck, it's great to dream.

  115. hahahahahahah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to quote from there LMAO

    To: Japan
    The unanimous Declaration of the gamers, otakus, and other words that mean the same things:

    WHEREAS Japan makes the coolest motherfucking shit, and

    WHEREAS mankind, empowered by science, is not unlike the Gods spoken of in Legend, and

    WHEREAS, I mean, how hard could it be,

    LET IT BE RESOLVED that we should *totally* Import the entire Island nation of Japan.

    Sincerely,

    The Undersigned

  116. Addresses people by theDigitizer · · Score: 1

    We need PHYSICAL ADDRESSES people! No one listens to online petitions or e-mail! Snail mail letters is the way! Someone find addresses of actual PEOPLE that we can mail at FOX. Quickly, Quickly. This is one of the best shows on television, I have no idea what FOX is smoking.

    --
    Contrary to popular belief, I don't actually make my website for other people to look at.
  117. Production costs by molrak · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's doubtful that Futurama or Family Guy could make the transition to cable using their current production methods. According to one Family Guy FAQ, the average production cost of each episode is $1.1 million (U.S.). While that's peanuts for network television (for example, Friends' 6 primary cast members are almost making that much an episode per 'Friend'), 1.1 mil is still outside the reach of most cable outlets. In all probability, Futurama probably costs more due to the 3-d effects employed in its animation, and also has a higher profile voice cast (Billy West, Katey Sagal, and John Dimaggio [who won the Annie this year for best voice actor]). So the only chances of Futurama's survival are Fox or another network.

    --
    You're only as smart as your brain.
  118. A WINNER IS YOU! by Platinum+Dragon · · Score: 1

    DINGfuckinglamenessfilterDINGDINGDINGDINGDINGDINGD INGDINGDING!

    Give the man a bong hit.

    --

    Someday, you're going to die. Get over it.
    1. Re:A WINNER IS YOU! by demaria · · Score: 2

      Yeah but it was corned beef not roast beef.

    2. Re:A WINNER IS YOU! by Platinum+Dragon · · Score: 1

      whoopsie, my bad:)

      it's been a while, and SPACE doesn't run it anymore; their licence to show it ran out back in the summer.

      --

      Someday, you're going to die. Get over it.
  119. So what? by easter1916 · · Score: 1

    It's been painfully unfunny from the first episode. Good riddance!

  120. If you actually want to save this show . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Working on a stint for Disney, I worked on lot of television shows. Trust me, email campagins don't mean didley. If you want to make an impressiion, write a letter. Letters, I believe, are considered to be represenative of 30,000 viewers, whereas emails are something like 10, or maybe lower than that. (maybe one, truthfully)

    But also understand, there might be other reasons for a show's cancellation which might have nothing to do with the show taking in ad revenue. For example, Le Femme Nitka was cancelled, but it was making a fine profit. It just wasn't making enough of a profit, and also, I think they grew tired of it.

  121. eliminate the execs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There needs to be a way that we, the community,
    can decide what shows we get to watch as opposed
    to a small number of executives which make
    decisions based on how much profit they can make
    from us.

  122. Two More Words: Adult Swim by cryptochrome · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yea verily, there is a place for canceled animated satire. It is called Adult Swim, and it is on Cartoon Network on Sundays, and already it has become a home for Baby Blues, Home Movies, Mission Hill, and the Oblongs. Unfortunately...

    1) Cartoon Network is part of Time-Warner, which isn't on good terms with Fox. (Same problem with Comedy Central though).

    2) Cartoon Network and Adult Swim are not well known with the mainstream adult audience, although they should be.

    3) Cartoon Network doesn't have the cash for expensive shows, hence their reliance on low budget original shows and syndicated cancelled ones. They could afford to pick up existing Futurama episodes, but probably not make new ones.

    --

    ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

    1. Re:Two More Words: Adult Swim by ryepup · · Score: 1

      Simpsons and adult swim are about the only TV I ever watch. You can download episodes of various adult swim shows here.
      http://www.fucinet.com/epdl/index.html

      Note that adult swim picked up old Critic episodes, which also targeted the Simpsons audience and was cancelled after a few seasons. This is promising for Futurama syndication, but forget new episodes.

    2. Re:Two More Words: Adult Swim by cryptochrome · · Score: 2

      While The Critic (along with many other shows) certainly suits Adult Swim, this is the first I've heard about them actually picking it up. They're already playing late nights on Comedy Central. Where'd you hear this?

      --

      ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

    3. Re:Two More Words: Adult Swim by ryepup · · Score: 1

      I might be mistaken. I saw it on fucinet.com that they had critic episodes along with Sealab, Space Ghost, etc. I remember watching it late at night, but that could've been on comedy central. Oopsy.

  123. Not suprised by Daimaou · · Score: 1

    Futurama was pretty funny sometimes. I'm sad to see it go and hope another network picks it up.

    I really liked the Tick. I thought the dialog was well done and Patrick's delivery was great. Here again, I would like to see another network pick it up, but I doubt either will happen.

    I hate the family guy and wish it would just die, but it still keeps coming back like a bad case of jock itch.

    Fox sucks!

    1. Re:Not suprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      family guy owns you shithead, wtf are you talking about? let me guess, you live in mass? yeah wickit pissa and shit... rhode island rules and so does family guy. F U!

  124. In memory of bender by geekoid · · Score: 2

    Bite my Shiny metal ass....FOX

    The problem is FOX has major sports, thats where they believe the money is.
    Hopefully another station will start doing what FOX did to get its rating up, and that is running cutting edge, and chancy, tv shows.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  125. why it's cancelled... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'm surprised no one here can figure out why all these shows are getting cancelled. Just take one look at the ratings and you'll see why. When networks go to see which shows are good shows, they don't go around asking for opinions of the show they look at the ratings to see who is watching what. All of these shows had virtually no viewers (a million or so viewers in a prime time spot is virtually nothing. A signature campaign doesn't work because all those signatures come out of those million or so viewers plus people who will sign anything. The only thing that could save those shows is if suddenly 6 or 7 million people began to watch them). Although some of that is stupidity (Why FOX put Family Guy up against Survivor and Friends and expected it to do well is beyond me... If you want to save a show, just track down a couple thousand people with the tv rating boxes, and force them to watch the shows you like.

  126. Futurama is a great show... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To me it seems almost like while the Simpsons is loosing a great amount of its humor that it once had (namely because Groening left for Futurama), Futurama is becoming stronger and funnier every season. So its completely ridiculous to cancel a show like this while leaving on such dreck as Ally McBeal and Malcolm in the Middle....And btw I've seen Family Guy and it doesn't seem as good as Futurama to me.

  127. FYI: Wired Magazine by Codex+The+Sloth · · Score: 1

    It was Wired Magazine that had the interview. I recall because it was one of the very rare occasions when I actually bought a copy.

    Even if it wasn't after football, going up against 60 minutes is a lousy spot. They ought to put it after the Simpsons and put Malcolm in the middle someplace very far away...

    --
    I am not a number! I am a man! And don't you ... oh wait, I'm #93427. Ha ha! In your face #93428!
    1. Re:FYI: Wired Magazine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Chile at least, FOX give to Futurama this spot (between Malcolm in the middle and the Simpsons) and its rating are only a bit lower than the Simpsons. Since they are cable ratings, they are not very high, but they show that in a good spot the rating for Futurama can be good.

  128. For sure! by Covant · · Score: 1


    UPN may be the best hope, though I'm not sure anybody is going to set up the petition..

    Won't somebody think of the children?!

    --
    "Peace, Love and Apathy"
  129. CF Roswell? by horsell · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Maybe we should all agree the day to send the letters to fox? That's what the Roswell guys did, we'll have to see if that works. But, the idea of having all the letters arrive all at once so they look all the more impressive strikes me as quite a nifty one :)

  130. Good ... by trexl · · Score: 1

    maybe now they can get back to their senses and move Family Guy to the newly opened time slot.

  131. Try a spellchecker and a few English lessons by TheMonkeyDepartment · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hey, I'm no Anglo-centrist, but it seems to me that a petition like this would be taken more seriously if it wasn't loaded with spelling and grammatical errors. "What kind of people would think something like this is important?" you might ask. The kind of people who would cancel a great show like Futurama. Seriously, good spelling and grammar will get you a lot further.

  132. At least give us the DVD's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even if the shows (Futurama and Family Guy) do get cancelled, I hope to hell that the DVD's are made available in NA. Region encoding by The Man is keeping me down...that at a little PAL/NTSC problem.

    Futurama and The Family Guy were 2 of the only shows I watched on TV. Next thing you know, Junkyard Wars will be axed.

  133. I'm sorry but by Jack+Auf · · Score: 1

    Don't mean to be a troll, but this matters exactly how? It's _television_, which is by definition meaningless.

    And hey, I spent six months working as a contractor at FOX. Trust me - it' a miracle anything at all actually makes it onto the air, much less rational decisions made about _what_ gets on the air.

    Kill your television.

    --
    "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - BF
  134. NFL and bad schedule killed show by TheRealStyro · · Score: 1

    The real reason Futurama isn't more popular? Because Fox keeps pre-empting the show for football (what is the FOX Sports channel for? Knitting?) and because it is on too early. Having that that lame 'King of the Hill' on between Futurama and Simpsons is a really bad scheduling error that FOX should have corrected long ago.

    --
  135. yeah for media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dose any slashdotter out there have a Nielsen box?
    to me theve always been those mysterious things people in the northeast have...

    people...dont waste you breath getting fox or any other network to do anything....they only listen to what 5000 people with mysterious black boxes say.

  136. Futurama, Family Guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....all I have left now is King of the Hill,
    "I tell you what".... and Enterprise (just kidding!)

    And the only reason I watched both Futurama and
    Family Guy, besides the fact that they were the best written shows out there, was because of P2P .
    Never could remember where they shuffled the shows but could find them online in a heartbeat.

    FG was unapoligetically topical at times; I was sure that they were gonna get the boot the first year when they had Peter tell a jew and an arab that they all looked the same to him. Im suprised they didnt get yanked off during the commercial break.

    To FOX credit, they've cancelled a lot of good shows but none of these shows would have ever aired on the lame networks (which get a woody once a year when Friends have a non-white special appearance).

    I thought that the short lived 'Action' was an amazing satire of the Hollywood scene...except
    it wasnt a satire.

    Say..does anyone know if 'Ellen' is still around?
    Its amazing how long crap floats when the execs try to cater to niche markets.

    1. Re:Futurama, Family Guy... by Hummercash · · Score: 1

      I thought that the short lived 'Action' was an amazing satire of the Hollywood scene...except it wasnt a satire.


      Jay Mohr was hilarious in that show. I think they replay the original eps on FX (but I'm not positive).

  137. Good luck! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TV answers to one god only: ratings. You can write letters forever, and you'll only grow old.

  138. Let's hope they spell check that petition before by geoffreya · · Score: 1

    they send it. I mean, just proof it, y'know? Someone want to let them know about that?

  139. Gonna be a pedantic prick here by Platinum+Dragon · · Score: 1

    Three seasons for ST, actually.

    79 episodes, and into history.

    --

    Someday, you're going to die. Get over it.
    1. Re:Gonna be a pedantic prick here by mrsam · · Score: 1

      79 episodes, and into history.

      ... plus a pilot episode.

  140. Just another one... by powerlinekid · · Score: 2

    Its kind of funny... theres a quote from the simpsons xfiles episode where homer goes "Yeah and people don't believe me, we can just sell it to the fox network." and Bart follows up with "yeah they'll buy anthing". Haha... the sad thing is fox always cancels their best shows... the family guy is the best cartoon since simpsons and southpark. Hilariously random. Futurama was alright, I wasn't a big watcher... but alot of people swear by it. The critic was awesome, thank god ccentral picked up it on syndicate. The tick was alright... i watched one episode and it did make me laugh. Anyway, the point as if i had one... i think fox doesn't know whats good on its channel. They seem to be trying please all demographics except the 15-35 year old white male one, which lets be honest is definitly what adult cartoons are more aimed for. Its sad...

    --

    can't sleep slashdot will eat me
  141. It hasn't been given a fair shot! by dukeoflostvegas · · Score: 1

    The time slot and priority given to Futurama has domed it to ratings failure from its onset. It gets preempted for anything and gets stuck at the ass end, in this case the beginning, of the Sunday line-up.

    While many Simpsons fans don't enjoy Fry and the gang as much as Bart and Homer, I haven't met one that doesn't like the show. And I have liked Futurama better than the Simpsons for the last couple of years for that matter, though the Simpsons has gotten better again. What genius at Fox hasn't realized that if the two were tied more closely together, at least for a while, Futurama would benefit from the cross over appeal. I know I'd stick around and watch Futurama in the 7:30 (Central) time slot instead of that monstrosity of a sitcom, Malcom in 'F-ing' the Middle.
    Anyone else here wanna kick in that Framkie Mun-whatevers teeth in?

  142. glad for the invention of television? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you need to invent yourself a life!

  143. I would watch if I could by Fweeky · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Unfortunately, being among the majority of people in the known Universe, I don't get 1000 channels to choose from, so unless it's going to be on terrestrial or Sky One (which already has constant reruns of The Simpsons, 3-4/day ffs) or so, the closest me and 10 million other Brits are going to get to seeing it is a dodgy DivX :(

    So far I've seen the first series cut very badly on Channel 4, the first two in crappy .rm format, and about 3 DivXed episodes after that.

    1. Re:I would watch if I could by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DivX??

      bah.. I have every episode in VCD >:)

  144. great show...I'll miss it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Futurama is one of the best shows I've seen in a while. The jokes were funny, or at least mildly amusing, and I regularly tuned in to watch it when I could.

    Where's your bathroom?
    Bath-what?
    Bathroom
    What-room?
    BATHROOM!
    What-what?
    aah, never mind.

    Oh, and series one of Futurama is available on DVD in the UK since last week. I just finished watching the whole thing...hehe, I forgot how good that "I, roommate" episode was.

  145. The greatest reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    soory, I don't speak english... I'am hungarian men. Futurama rulez! Don't enough!!!

  146. Except ZIM! by Arben · · Score: 0

    I'm surprised only one person mentioned Invader Zim in all this. It has never been promoted, and Nick (which hasn't shown a new ep. since halloween) is holding supposed last ten eps of season one and scaled back season two from a new 20 shows to the 6 completed. It was easily one of the best cartoons on lately, and some weeks, it can still be seen at maybe 1pm on Sundays. There are Two Petitions going on the same site (the second is longer, but the first has about 32,000 more names.) And unlike the family guy reply below, IZ is plenty geekish.

    --
    This post, like so much of Creation, is NotArt
  147. Stop whining by SIGFPE · · Score: 0, Troll

    If someone else doesn't provide the programming you want then write your own and open source it.

    --
    -- SIGFPE
  148. Dammit! Fox = idiots! by Man+In+Black · · Score: 1

    If they'd given this show a half-decent time slot, it would have done so much better. I was really pissed off when it was moved to make room for Malcolm in the Middle (a terrible show in my opinion), and where it currently is, it was pre-empted for football 90% of the time (thank god that foolishness is over for another season).

    In my opinion, Futurama is better than the last few seasons of the Simpsons have been... I really hope Fox changes their mind (or at least that a channel like TeleToon picks it up...)

    --
    -"One machine can do the work of fifty ordinary men. No machine can do the work of one extraordinary man." -EH
  149. Paper Address to mail letters! by theDigitizer · · Score: 2, Insightful
    From the Fox.com website -

    HERE

    Futurama
    P.O. Box 900
    Attn: Futurama
    Beverly Hills, CA 90213-0900

    Send those letters! Snail mail is the only thing they listen to. Not online petitions or e-mail!

    --
    Contrary to popular belief, I don't actually make my website for other people to look at.
  150. The timing is pretty horrible... by koganuts · · Score: 0

    With this news in mind, I wonder what the mood is going to be like at the 2002 William S. Paley TV Festival at the end of this month? (Futurama is one of the featured series, and Matt Groening, et al will be present that evening.)

  151. I LOVE Malcolm in the Middle by jocknerd · · Score: 0

    That show is hilarious! It's a good mindless show before I switch over to HBO at 9:00 for whatever is running at the time.

  152. Oh well by xihr · · Score: 1

    It wasn't that great, anyway. Certainly it doesn't shine a candle to Simpsons or Family Guy.

  153. Not that I expect results, but... by phillymjs · · Score: 2

    ...I went and signed the online petition to save Futurama, and while I was there put my name to the ones for Family Guy and Undeclared as well.

    Anyone noticed that Fox seems to always cancel its good shows, while keeping unfunny shit like Malcolm in the Middle on along with voyeur crapola like Temptation Island?

    When they finally do away with *all* the shows I love, I'll have to start referring to Fox as "the good taste takes a holiday" network.

    ~Philly

    1. Re:Not that I expect results, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm posting anonymously to protect my good name *snicker*, but am I the only person who likes Malcolm in the Middle? I admit it's an aquired taste and I had to watch it a few times to appreciate it, but now I try and catch it every Sunday. It's actually rather clever, and has the same kind of silliness and hilarity as the Simpsons or Futurama.

      Or maybe it's because the mom on the show reminds me so much of my own.

  154. sports by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

    MLB and the NFL make huge money for the networks. Advertisers just can't wait to get an ad on during a NFL game, and the same is for baseball in certain areas (i live 1 hour away from NYC). plus, ratings for sports, right now, are pretty much guaranteed. next up is NASCAR, which isn't just for hicks anymore.

    it is no different than the 3 or 4 different versions of Battle Bots. people right now will watch.

    the WWF is seen more and more now too (books by the wrestlers that show up on NY Times best seller list, music etc)

    when the execs find something that works, they beat it to death. Family Guy, Futurama, and that stupid Texas show (don't know the name) are all examples of marginal shows, that only have 1 or 2 seasons of good ideas. in the end, they are cheap copies of what they did with the Simpsons.

    it is not just FOX, but all the networks. think Sex and the City spawns Querr as Folk.

  155. Then why make a DVD?? by DeadBugs · · Score: 2

    If it's so unpopular then why are they making a DVD box set for season 1, which appears to be already available in Europe And also info from the FOX Germany site I guess I need to get a Region 2 DVD player

    --
    http://www.kubuntu.org/
    1. Re:Then why make a DVD?? by Chetwood · · Score: 1

      My guess is that they made before they relaized that Fox was going to cancel the show. Of course, I'm afraid they won't release all seasons on DVD anymore.

      Both Futurama and Family Guy Season 1 DVDs are out in Europe simply cause we do not yet have to endure your stupid syndication. In case you guys are confused about what eps are in what season check out this airdates list/epcode translator.

      BTW, why didn't you just buy a region-free code DVD player? My no-name player (150 $) even has a remote that can switch between region codes on the fly so you can even play the new 'enhanced' DVDs that don't run on players set to region '0'...

      --
      "Oh dear, she's stuck in an infinite loop and he's an idiot"
    2. Re:Then why make a DVD?? by Eccles · · Score: 1

      BTW, why didn't you just buy a region-free code DVD player?

      Because he's in the U.S. I was able to get a region-free player only because it had a secret menu for doing so, and that particular model is no longer available. It's possible to mail/web-order region-free ones, but not to buy one in any of the electronics stores I know of.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  156. It's aparent Fox is full of retards by WndrBr3d · · Score: 1

    Because they've also canceled Family Guy twice already, just to bring it back.

    There's also another petition on the same site for saving Family Guy. I figure sign them both, save Fox from going from Shitty Shitty Shitty to Stinky Farty Smelly.

  157. Great News! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One less reason for me to regret having deactivated cable TV last month.

  158. It just wasn't that good....... by Gedvondur · · Score: 1

    I saw a somebody post higher up that "jeez it is a cult hit, just like Star Trek...."

    C'mon folks. I watched a few episodes of Futurama and while occasionally good, it just wasn't consistantly funny. It was a bit tired from the get go, just like the Simpsons is now. All they need to do now is put the Simpsons to rest. Its getting long in the tooth too. Groenig needs a new schtick, something fresh. Shock cartoons on prime time TV are, thanks to his programs, done to death. Let them die quietly.

  159. Why it really got cancelled by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 2
    Network exec #1: The whole Futurama thing is just so ironic '90's, you know. That concept's done to death.

    Network exec #2: Yeah, and that Groenig guy's from Portland, anyway... Who the hell comes from Portland, for God's sake? And he can't even draw!

    Network exec #3: The numbers are sucking, too. That ironic thing is tired. But before we cancel it, we gotta come up with a show for that slot.

    Network exec #2: Well, the market surveys say that sincerity and wholesomeness is hot right now but, somehow, bringing back the Osmonds just doesn't seem right.

    Network exec #1: But people still like cartoons. I got it! The Family Circus Hour. We could do production in Japan and keep costs down...

    Network exec #2: Yeah, but it still has to be a bit edgy. You know, send the mom back to work...

    Network exec #3: As a stripper!!! Those Japanese cartoonists could do some nice stuff to Mom's cleavage!

    Network exec #2: The stripper's a good touch! It'll get the 14-25 YM demographic.

    Network exec #1: Boys, I think we got a real winner here. We'll call it "The Family Circus - Mom's a Stripper - Hour. That's just the working title, of course. Joe, call legal to get us the rights; Jim, call Eddie Johnson to hack us a script together; Bill, call Okutaka-san to set up the anime contract. Marvin, go ahead with the press release saying that we're cancalling that Futurama turkey and get the press rolling for TFCMSH. This new show is going to be ratings heaven!!!!

    --
    That is all.
  160. Write via dead tree by isorox · · Score: 2
    Great publicity, thousands of people from slashdot will sign the petition. Unfortunatly a floppy disk with the petion on isnt very impressive.

    Even as a poor impoverished student I'm sending letters (signed by a few of us) to fox, and I like in europe.

    You need to write letters. Go buy 6 letters and stamps at the local mall/post office, we have some mailing to do during the next few days. International public, too! Airmail is only a like 1 or 2 euros or equivalent. A letter is worth about 1000 petition entries. Some stuff to include: Hugely popular overseas, potent quality public, never having a chance to grow due to severe time slot sabotage. Have a look at the petition text for hints on what to write and add anything YOU can think of. It's your letter. No excuses for not getting a pen right now!


    it was pen and paper that brought back the original series of star trek, not a 30 second petition signing.
    1. Re:Write via dead tree by J'raxis · · Score: 1

      In 1966 these 8,000+ electronic signatures would have filled up a warehouse of magnetic drums. I think that would have sufficient effect. :)

  161. How Ridiculous by Rura+Penthe · · Score: 2

    First Family Guy, now Futurama. Fox seems hell-bent on making sure I never watch their crappy network again. I have religiously watched both of these shows since their inception despite constant preemption, horrible timeslots (Family Guy went up against both Survivor *and* Friends), and lackluster promotion. I even have every episode in MPEG and my friends and I watch them all the time when we can't see new eps/reruns on TV. When people come over and I show them the shows most of them have never even *heard* of Family Guy (or sometimes even Futurama) yet when they leave they love it. I'm tellin' ya, there ain't no justice (tanj!).

  162. Futurama?!? by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 1


    Futurama?!? I've been trying to get Chris Elliot's Get a Life back on the air for years.

    Now I have two causes to fight for.

    !Viva la revolucion!

  163. The end of futurama by zenith744 · · Score: 1
    Excellent. Now if they'll just cancel the Simpsons (which actually should have cancelled before futurama), I can be truly happy. I know no one else will be, but hey, it's hard to please everyone. Besides, if they cancel the simpsons, there will then be absolutely no reason for FOX to exist! Isn't that enough happiness for everyone?

  164. ...Screw Fox! by Rura+Penthe · · Score: 2

    I'm gonna start my own network! With blackjack...and hookers! In fact, forget the network!

    (with all apologies to Futurama)

    1. Re:...Screw Fox! by ZaMoose · · Score: 2

      Alright, if everyone's done being stupid...

      I had more, but... you go ahead.

      --
      I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
  165. Going About This The Wrong Way by JPawloski · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I heard an interview with a man that worked for a valley (Phoenix) radio station, and he was talking about public feedback. The most surprisingly thing he said was that, in general, stations tend to ignore mass-petitions like the one in the article. The logic behind this was that the people who set forth the petition are making a significant effort to save a show, and this may sway people's opinions. On the other hand, viewers or listeners who take it upon themselves to write into a station are given a significant weight. The amount of weight depends on the number of overall listeners and probably some deep statistical reasoning, but I do know from the anecdote he gave that for 910 KFYI (now 550 KFYI) one individual writing a letter is considered to represent 8,800 people.

    Remember, an unsolicited opinion is always better than a solicited opinion. This is the same principle.

    So instead of signing the petition, WRITE A LETTER (not e-mail, the old kind of letter where you put a stamp on). If everyone who had signed the petition had written a letter, I can almost guarantee you Fox would put FR back on TV.

  166. Pure genious by cr@ckwhore · · Score: 2

    Futurama is pur genious, all packaged into a 30 minute spot for our consumption. Its an awesome cartoon, with some really deep humor, especially for us geek types.

    I can't believe they're canceling it!! Christ, they haven't had it on the air in any regular schedule for the past year! Of course its probably had poor numbers, nobody ever knows when its going to be on!!! Are things not this obvious to the clowns over at Fox?

    I don't watch much TV... it sucks anyway.

    --
    Skiers and Riders -- http://www.snowjournal.com
  167. wait... by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

    Fox still has TV shows?
    er I mean good TV shows

  168. i didn't even know it was still on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i used to watch it, but for a while it just disappeared, i didn't see any commercials, assumed it was off the air

  169. ... the family guy! by burtonator · · Score: 2

    They also axed the family guy.

    The futurama and the cable guy were the best shows on TV!

    I never missed an episode.

  170. Blessing In Disguise? by Shuh · · Score: 1

    Maybe the Futurama writers will go back to writing for The Simpsons and save it from being ruined by the current group of monkeys-at-typewriters that have been doing scripts for the show the past few years...

  171. Which goes to show... by ArnoldYabenson · · Score: 0

    You can expect an asshole who loves Family Guy to hate Futurama.

  172. Show that is REPLACING futurama =(((( by NewSegway · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Who Wants to Marry Temptation Island Millionaires in the Chamber... While Animals Attack?"

  173. Worst Cartoon Show Ever!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    see subject ;)

  174. Futurama IS a knockoff by Theodore+Logan · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Note: this is not a flamebait. I'm a huge fan of both the Simpsons and Futurama. In my opinion, Futurama is the better show.

    But the truth is that Futurama really is extremely similar to the Simpsons. The type of animation is exactly the same. The music's very similar. The voices are similar. The jokes are similar. The whole style, soul and idea of the show is the same. The only thing that's different is the period in time they're supposed to take place. Don't agree? Consider a hypothetical show by the name "Simpsons 3000". Can you imagine such a show not being very very similar to Futurama?

    You can argue all you want that Futurama is a great show that should be kept on the air - and I'm all with you - but don't tell me it's not a Simpsons knockoff. Believe me, it is, and it's worth saving anyway.

    --

    "If you think education is expensive, try ignorance" - Derek Bok

    1. Re:Futurama IS a knockoff by bludstone · · Score: 2

      "The type of animation is exactly the same. "

      No it isnt.

      Futurama uses detailed computer graphics with cel shading, and it shows. The Simpsons are still traditional cel and paint slave labor.

      The style and character design, however, are extremely similar. :)

      --

      no .sig
  175. this sucks by fuzbuster · · Score: 0

    why the hell cancel good shows like futurama and they replace them with moronic shows such as bernie mac show, temptation island, grounded for life, that 70s/80s show and malcom in the middle.

    all of these shows really suck, ever since married with children stopped fox has gone down hill in my opinion, the simpsons plots are getting more and more ridiculous.

    and whats with this new puppet show they are advertising, yeah this is a winner, go fox woo hoo

  176. What would make more sense... by eclectric · · Score: 2

    Move Futurama and The Family Guy to the soon-to-be vacated 9:00 sunday night slot. Just more proof that entertainment-by-committee just doesn't work.

  177. Good News, Everyone. by Karma+Sucks · · Score: 2

    I have it on good authority that Fox is replacing Futurama with the XFL.

    Hooray!

    --
    (Please browse at -1 to read this comment.)
  178. coincidence? by night_flyer · · Score: 2
    --


    Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
    Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
  179. Explaining the ratings by meman2000 · · Score: 1

    Although I disagree with Fox about cancelling the show, if they claim bad ratings I'll believe it. Most college students, myself included (and most people on a broadband connection for that matter) have access to file sharing programs like WinMX, Morpheus, etc. One of the neat thing about these programs is that you can download episodes of *gasp* Futurama, as well as the Simpsons, X-files, and other shows big in the /. community. So we've all got the latest episodes downloaded, why even bother turning on the TV? No commercials, we can watch episodes whenever we want, its a digital utopia. But FOX executives are probably looking at the TV ratings, seeing lowered ratings of our favorites (due to this), and canning the shows. The inherent problem here is, people are watching the shows, but not on TV.

  180. Bad news everyone! by Marton · · Score: 1

    I live in Europe. I didn't know about this show until a friend told me about it. Then I went to a.b.m.futurama and started downloading what I could.

    This is SERIOUSLY GOOD STUFF! I understand it's huge in Germany, and other parts of Europe where people are fortunate enough to have decent TV stations. Watching Bundesliga soccer, you can see people holding up signs with Bender on them.

    I got the 1st season on DVD. Yes, all you USA residents, it did come out in Europe. Go check amazon.co.uk. And it sold out FAAAST!

  181. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  182. Why am I reading this on slashdot? by Dock · · Score: 1

    I don't see the point. This isn't tvguide.com. On the creative side I'm sure it's good entertainment and no doubt a lot of people are sad to see it come to it's end, but it doesn't belong. I know comments get punished here for being off-topic, but why aren't the main authors punished for posting inane stories?

    I'm sure it's possible to filter anything marked television, and I'm going to look into that the instant I'm done here. But if you are going to allow digressive news, you shouldn't bill yourself as a nerd site imho. This is just becoming another "post your own favorite interests" site for a bunch of people.

    --
    http://about.me/paultenny
  183. My Wacko Theory by Sloppy · · Score: 2

    People like me watch Family Guy and Futurama. We don't care about the timeslot because we have Tivos, so we don't miss episodes. But, since we have Tivos, we don't watch commercials. Ergo, making stuff I want to see, doesn't pay.

    People who watch Temptation Island, do watch commercials, and they download and excecute the code that tells them what to like and buy -- that's the whole reason those people watch that crap in the first place. Ergo, it pays to make crap.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  184. Bah! by CyberDruid · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'll produce my own Futurama-show... With black jack... And hookers!
    In fact, forget the show.
    And the black jack.

    Aehhh... screw the whole thing! :(

    --

    Opinions stated are mine and do not reflect those of the Illuminati

    1. Re:Bah! by ZaMoose · · Score: 2

      Owww. My side. THat was just about the funniest things I've read in a long, loooong time.

      Still one of my favorite [adapted] Futurama quotes, although "'Please, don't be alarmed, we're harmless!' 'I have THREE arms!' 'I said harmless, not armless!'" has to beat it out, IMNSHO...

      --
      I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
  185. X-Fry by mcmanus · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hey Bender, will the futurama references be cancelled
    from the next version of slashcode too? (gotta stay current!)


    /home/person>telnet slashdot.org 80
    Trying 64.28.67.150...
    Connected to slashdot.org.
    Escape character is '^]'.
    HEAD / HTTP/1.1
    host: slashdot.org:80

    HTTP/1.1 200 OK
    Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 03:20:08 GMT
    Server: Apache/1.3.20 (Unix) mod_perl/1.25 mod_gzip/1.3.19.1a
    SLASH_LOG_DATA: shtml
    X-Powered-By: Slash 2.003000
    X-Fry: I'm gonna be a science fiction hero, just like Uhura, or Captain Janeway, or Xena!
    Connection: close
    Content-Type: text/html

    Connection closed by foreign host.

  186. Anything with a Gore deserves to die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's been tainted by a Gore too long to be allowed to survive.

  187. Explains a lot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ...about the piss-poor quality of slashdot.

    Futurama is one of the few shows that make me glad for the invention of television.

  188. don't be afraid to write! by MobyTurbo · · Score: 1

    Star Trek was saved from the axe for a few more seasons by a letter writing campaign, so don't think you can't make a difference.

  189. Gurrilla tactics. by Tjp($)pjT · · Score: 1

    When you sign the petition, let them know that you are going to suggest Cartoon Network pick up Futurama. Then go to Cartoon Network's feedabck page and let them know that you'd like them to pick up the show if Fox drops it!

    --
    - Tjp

    I am in wallow with my inner money grubbing capitalistic pig. ... Oink!

  190. How much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How much does it cost to produce Futurama? Instead of writing petitions, maybe each of you should throw in $10-20.

  191. TWO petitions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's kind of a pain to write two petitions and have both signed by everyone out there. Can't we just CC: the Fox petition to UPN?

  192. God, you are such a fucking loser. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go back to watching 'Friends,' dorkboy.

  193. On Line Petitions Don't Work by Not+The+Real+Me · · Score: 1

    When you are you ./ people going to realize that petitions and e-mail have very little impact on executives or politicians?! For a lot of the decision makers, one signed hand written letter means more than ten thousand e-mails. This is the way the real world works.....

  194. Nah...think I'll pass by Sabalon · · Score: 2

    I used to love this show, then I started missing it when fox started to juggle it around.

    Then they had that terrible xmas episode this last year. After watching that episode, I decided I'd never watch the show again. It was just wrong, and this is coming from someone who loves the original south park (the 5 minute short).

  195. Anyone remember 'The Critic?' by pinkj · · Score: 1

    I think he summed up my feelings about Futurama:

    'It stinks!'

    Hah, I'm so funny I could have my own adult oriented animated program on FOX!

  196. Jesus Kerist, the show friggin sucked! by fisternipply · · Score: 0

    Whaddaya expect, it's a dumb show.

  197. Damn it by astrotek · · Score: 1

    Its the only show on TV I can consistantly laugh at. But I'll admit that Im not accually watching it, gotta love Morpheous. It's a TiVo on my computer.

  198. Hmmm by Annatar2 · · Score: 1

    I'm curious as to whether Fox has thought this through more then most of us are willing to admit. Being a faithful fan of both shows it seems to me I've noticed much more creative energy being put into making Futurama, the end result being that the Simpsons has seriously started to lag. While Futurama is a great show, The Simpsons has a much larger, and wider fan base. Fox may be cutting Futurama in an effort to force Groeing to put all his effort back into the Simpsons. Not even sure how much time the man actual spends on either show but it is an idea.

  199. Re: Football / Other Timeslots by Spuggy · · Score: 1

    Hells yeah, I refuse to work on Sunday's (granted I have a job now where working on them isn't even an option) because of Football. The question here though shouldn't be whether or not Football should run over; the for the game, there is no reason why it shouldn't.

    Look, I know everyone's psyched up to trash Football on this, but the amount of revenue the sport brings in and the amount that Fox/CBS/ABC pays to broadcast it is astronomical. And for those who are saying that Football should be cut off at their respective time slot, you're in the minority in the rest of the US. Check the Nielsens for any week during the NFL season. Aside from "trend" shows (ie. Millionaire at the time, Survivor at the time) Monday Night Football is almost always the highest rated show.

    That being said, there are plenty of other time slots out there for Fox to put a show in. Futurama is my favorite show on TV and it pisses me off that Fox would even consider cancelling it. Do we really need to see That 70's Show 5x a week? Yes its also a great show and also one of my favorites, but this type of replay should be saved for Syndication--not prime time viewing. That 80's Show is a piece of trash. Okay, there might be a market for it out there, but that's beside the point. My point is, is that it's not like Fox has hit after hit show on TV. For God's sake, get rid of the atrocity Temptation Island (The First Season bombed when none of the couples broke up, and the Second one sucks because it's obvious they're just throwing everything possible at the couples in an attempt to get some of them to break up). For Prime Time Viewing, there is essentially 10 good hours per week--Sunday-Thursday (8-10). Don't try to tell me that Fox has 10 hours worth of good shows a week.

    How about this? Move Malcolm in the Middle (one of their highest rated shows) to another time-slot now that it got its boost from the Simpsons, and put Futurama after the Simpsons for at least a season. That should be good enough to grow your fan-base with a similar style audience. Don't just cancel the damned show because you gave it absolutely no advertising, gave it a horrible time slot, and in that time slot, didn't manage to show it the majority of the time anyway.

    Ah well--guess that's why I could never have a Nielsen box. I'd take the job too seriously and go beserk trying to save every show I like.

    Oh well, maybe we'll get lucky and another Network would pick it up. Hell maybe even WB, after all--do they really need 10 Dawson's Creek clones?

  200. Dana Gould has killed the Simpsons by Civil_Disobedient · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Slightly off-topic, but since the subject has come to the Simpsons, I must say this.

    HOMR is from last season, probably the last half-decent season the Simpsons will ever see. While Season 12 had more than the normal share of not-very-good episodes, this season has been truly awful. The reason is simple, and his name is Dana Gould.

    For those of you who don't know, Dana Gould is a failed stand-up comic who is now taking his lowest common denominator humor to the Simpsons and is singularly responsible for it's current lackluster -- hell, let's just be honest, god-awful humor. Homer getting raped by a panda? Homer finding a corpse as a child? The constant rehashing of previous plot-lines and characters? Say thank you to Dana.

    I now find myself tuning in every Sunday night with my fingers crossed, repeating a mantra of "Please don't suck... please don't suck" and for this entire season I have been disapointed. Certainly there were funny jokes. But the Simpsons has turned into stringing forced "big-laughs" into loosely-woven plotlines than generally tend to revolve around celebrities or Homer being an idiot. If you check the 2/10/02 episode, you'll count almost twenty-five producers. 25 producers. Management is strangling the life out of this wonderful series while Dana Gould stomps on its putrifying corpse with his steel-toed jack-boots.

    I think Lisa's hypothetical question at the end of the 1/6/02 episode says it all: "Is this the end of our series" ... "of events?"

    1. Re:Dana Gould has killed the Simpsons by M-G · · Score: 2

      Is Gould responsible for the disconnected story lines that have been going on lately? For example, the one where Bart is digging a hole in the backyard at the beginning. They follow that thread for a few minutes, then go to something completely different. Same thing with the other night and the Gay Pride parade.

      Sure, those bits had their funny parts, but they were completely disconnected from the rest of the show, as though the writers lacked the talent to come up with enough story line to fill an episode.

  201. Offline Writing Letter Campaign / Saving the Show by Spuggy · · Score: 1

    Didn't notice this in anybody's posts.

    Received a reply to an inquiry to Marc (Owner of the On-Line Petition) referring me to the site for the Off-Line Letter Writing Campaign here.

    [From the site:
    Let's face it, this is going to be hard battle and we doubt that online petitions will help much, but we do not want to exclude these options: There is a petition by CGEF going at petitiononline . Click this link to open a new window and sign away. I will wait here till you are done. (Please stop mailing me about the spelling mistakes, I asked petitiononline to correct a few. Bear with me, I'm German ;))

    2. This wasn't too hard. But now comes the most important part. You need to write letters. Go buy 6 letters and stamps at the local mall/post office, we have some mailing to do during the next few days. International public, too! Airmail is only a like 1 or 2 euros or equivalent. A letter is worth about 1000 petition entries. Some stuff to include: Hugely popular overseas, potent quality public, never having a chance to grow due to severe time slot sabotage. Have a look at the petition text for hints on what to write and add anything YOU can think of. It's your letter. No excuses for not getting a pen right now! ]

    Check if out if you guys are serious about saving the show.

  202. First time on slashdot by spacefrog · · Score: 3, Funny

    A slashbot actually complaining that there isn't enough advertising.

    Hang on while I scrape this ice off satan's windshield.

  203. Trying very hard to understand the logic: by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 5, Interesting



    I am a young, educated professional with pretty hefty chunk of disposable income. Most of my friends are young, educated professionals with a hefty chunks of disposable income. Most of my friends enjoy the same shows I do (things like futurama, family guy, adult swim, and others). Now, as far as I know, young professionals with disposable income is a pretty choice demographic.

    So why is it good shows that people like me watch always seem to be going off the air just when I start to enjoy them, while shows that seem to appeal to a, er, less desirable demographic seem to succeed? Something like 'Temptation Island' may get a large viewer base, but from what I've experienced (and I don't claim to be an expert), those types of people would be of little interest to advertisers, save places like Wal-mart or used car dealerships with a large inventory of pickup trucks.

    I'm not trying to be elitist, I'm sure at one point I'll get married and the drudgery of work and family will stretch my mind so much I'll take solace in the soothing simplicity of bad TV, while stretching my wallet to the point where sales at Wal-Mart will become interesting. But for the time being, well, I'm not.

    So I've been trying to figure out why Fox has handled Futurama the way they have, and this is what I've come up with.

    1. The ratings system is really, really off base. Somehow, the companies who track ratings are giving incorrect numbers back to the networks, or the advertisers are reading them wrong. In college I was an account executive for a radio station (meaning I sold advertising). I found extensive frustration in the fact that our numbers were always very low while our ads always had such good direct feedback. I remember once a failed pitch I had with the owner of a bicycle shop, who would buy ads from a competitor (a country and western station) that cost 10 times as much as ours. Why? Because their ratings were higher. While I'm sure people who like country buy bicycles, after years of advertising the stores prime clientele appeared to remain the sort of people who preferred rock.

    2. The networks are full of idiots. I don't mean their stupid because the shows are so bad; It's been decades since quality was a priority, only money matters now. (Rupert Murdoch even admitted years ago in an interview that the only show he really enjoys watching on his network was the 'Simpsons'). But even with money a priority, they still manage to muck it up. If you have a show with promise that's starting to catch on, you don't run it in a timeslot opposite a highly popular show on another network, then shrug your shoulders thinking 'oh I wonder why the ratings went down'. They make programming changes that succeed more in alienating viewers then to expose new shows. They seem to over promote the sort of stuff that just won't catch on, and ignore shows that might attract viewers.

    3. The advertisers are idiots. Television is a for-profit business, and in all fairness, they will do whatever it takes to accommodate their revenue stream. On the other hand, it's the job of the people in marketing to get their message out to the largest number of potential customers for the least amount of money. So why then do I see ads for tampons during reruns of 'The A-Team'? Sure, woman watch 'The A-Team', but it seems to me they could have spent the cash for the A-team spot on another show that would reach a larger number of potential customers for the same amount of money. So many times I see an ad on TV and think 'I can't of anyone who would watch this show that would buy this product'.

    For all the money advertisers spend on research and production, they so often forget about actually reaching their target demographic when it's time to buy ad space. A show like Futurama may only get 150,000 viewers (I'm making these numbers up for the sake of example), but if 75% of those viewers are likely to spend more then $1,000 a year on electronic equipment, you have a pretty solid demographic for the electronics based industry. . .at least enough to keep the show running. But instead of looking at those demographics, a company will spend more money to buy a spot on a show that has a viewer base of 1 million (say, a temptation island), despite the fact that only 5% of those viewers are in their demographic. Do a little math, and you realize there are some misplaced resources.

    4. People are idiots. We put up with poor programming. We pay extra for cable so we can receive more channels with more advertising. We holler and scream when our favorite shows are canceled and beg networks to let us make money for them. It could be that all my armchair analysis above is wrong. There is some deep logical reasoning for the seemingly asinine behavior of the networks and advertisers that maximizes profits. It could be this model will continue to be used so as long as we put up with it despite the fact that no viewer is ever really satisfied.

    I'd like to think it's some sort of combination of the first three, but there is this sad, nagging voice that tells me it's all 4.

    --
    The Internet is generally stupid
    1. Re:Trying very hard to understand the logic: by cnock · · Score: 1
      You say:

      I'm not trying to be elitist, I'm sure at one point I'll get married and the drudgery of work and family will stretch my mind so much I'll take solace in the soothing simplicity of bad TV, while stretching my wallet to the point where sales at Wal-Mart will become interesting.

      I might point out that your view of married and family life seems to be culled right out of bad TV shows.

      I am married and have several children. Most of my friends are also married and have several children. For the most part, we enjoy drudgery-free lives. Sure we are busier than you are, but that means we must be much more selective with our TV watching. I can afford about two hours per week to watch TV, so I surely am not interested in watching Walmart commercials.

      Please be careful with your generalizations.

    2. Re:Trying very hard to understand the logic: by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 2

      Point taken. But it really does beg the question, who are all these people out there watching shows like Temptation Island or The Chamber? I'm going to generalize again, but I have this picture in my mind of dad sitting in the easy chair in his undershirt sipping Coors light while mom is in sweat pants finishing off a bag of potato chips.

      Nobody I know likes this stuff, so there must be a huge number of faceless Americans out there who exist on a completely different cultural level then myself. I want to know who they are, and how did we as a society failed them by making sub-par low brow entertainment their most attractive choice?

      --
      The Internet is generally stupid
    3. Re:Trying very hard to understand the logic: by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      If you are wondering where the ratings numbers come from when was the last time you (or a person of your ilk) was asked to be a Nielson family or keep a listening/viewing diary? I suspect the people being asked for data are all those Wal-Mart shoppers you mentioned.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  204. On the cancellation of Fururama... by Tibe · · Score: 1

    "ahhhhh!!!, noooooo, ohh, ahhhh! %$(* ouch ahhh noooooo... oh im OK." - Amy.
    Futurama S03E04 Parasites lost
    Oh and im writing my congressman now.

  205. For all of you who missed it on TV by Shiny+Metal+S. · · Score: 2

    See the #futurama IRC channel on Dalnet.

    --

    ~shiny
    WILL HACK FOR $$$

  206. Daria by (outer-limits) · · Score: 1

    Come on, Daria was the best. It actually used irony, something most Americans don't seem to know exists.

    --

    Microsoft - Where would you like to go today, Maybe Jail?

    1. Re:Daria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Her holier-than-thou routine got tired fast.

  207. Collector's Items by inKubus · · Score: 1

    Groeing will come up with something else, you can be sure. In other news, I just got a whole set of Futurama collectable tin toys--I might have to stash them somewhere if they weren't so cool.

    --
    Cool! Amazing Toys.
  208. Re Three more words - People Like Us by (outer-limits) · · Score: 1

    I haven't seen anything so funny in a long time. Not only is it funny, it is not afraid to be cruel. If you haven't seen it, it is an English send up of the old school British documentary.

    --

    Microsoft - Where would you like to go today, Maybe Jail?

  209. I can't believe this... by CCIEwannabe · · Score: 0

    Like Zoidberg says: Thats It! I'm going for a scuttle!

  210. they can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bite my shiny metal a$$

  211. What IS quality? by TheVidiot · · Score: 1

    Hell, I only watch a few hours of TV (Simpsons, X, Futurama, ER {but not for much longer}), and I'm losing half of them! So, clearly, I am not part of the "target demographic", which, just as clearly, must be a bunch of slack-jawed yokels.

  212. Bla bla bla by mrfiddlehead · · Score: 1
    All FOX (CBS, ABC, NBC, ...) programming sucks these days. I'm a little surprised how passionate some of you people are about Futurama which I find to be tedious and unfunny. The only character who's even remotely funny, in my mind, is the cigar smoking robot, but even he is one of the reasons that the Simpsons have become similarly lame in the past few years.

    Reason #1 why the Simpsons went down the tube? Homer became a complete hateful idiot. Originally, before many of you were cognisant, Homer was a lovable oaf. Somehow, the writers decided that he should be an angry hateful oaf. The humour surrounding Homer has turned into one mean act after another.

    It's amazing how a similarly minded group of individuals can disagree so completely on humour. I suspect we are witnessing here the dreaded 'Generation Gap'. Kids these day. Feh! I find it interesting that some people dislike shows like Malcolm in the Middle (which I find to be occasionally humourous) and then turn around and promote Futurama. Something for everyone, most of the time, appears to be the approach used by the suits at Fox.

    BTW, if you want to see a funny show, and you have access to digital cable in Canada, check out The Royles. But only if you find potty mouth jokes to be funny.

    --
    :wq
  213. morpheus worth a look by phoenix123 · · Score: 0

    I am SO happy that there is morpheus filesharing. Didn't watch more than one or two episodes on TV but still got all on my HDD ;).

    if fox cancels the series, the smallest station that broadcasts the next futurama-episodes, it is sufficient for me. somebody will MPEG them and share them on morpheus. that way it's even free of the damn commercials.

    here in germany it is broadcasted by pro7, some network that just ran into big financial problems. I bet they'll now go on an audience whoring trip spitting out self produced garbage like the other german crapchannels.
    and it will surely be too expensive to translate the futurama episodes anymore. boohoohooo no more german futurama series.
    ...now where did I put my gun?

  214. Get a grip, people by toxcspdrmn · · Score: 1

    Why are there 2 "Save Futurama" petions in the top 10? Is this a genuine effort to save a much-loved TV show, or an exercise in "my petition's bigger than your petition"?

    --
    "E pur si muove!" - attributed to Galileo Galilei, 1564-1642
  215. Futurama was killed by fox program directors. by rjljr · · Score: 1

    I know that the petition talks about this. But futurama really got a raw deal. Almost EVERY time i sat down to watch it, looking forward to it (with my son), it wasnt on. Instead there was football. No, not actually football, but just talking heads TALKING about football. I mean who watches these after-game talk-about-the-game-just-on shows anyway? I love football and baseball, but after the game is over, enough already! I ALREADY heard these commentators opinion for three hours. Instead they could have gone to the REGULARLY scheduled futurama show. Bad programmers. No twinkee. (Yeah, different kind of programmer... but still.)

    --
    -> Ron Legere I can never think of anything clever to put here.
  216. its all about ratings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its their own fault as they didn't fit in with the Fox lineup. They should have added an airheaded lawyer, a couple slutty high school kids, maybe a few trash talking wrestlers.

  217. let it go, it could have been done better by mr.ska · · Score: 2
    While I personally enjoyed Futurama, I found that it relied far, far, FAR, FAR too heavily on 20th/21st century references. What, living in the year 3000 can't stand on its own feet? Do you have to bring back millennium-old actors, politicians, celebrities, singers, and the like? It's a crutch, nothing more.

    The characters were great. The interaction was great. The animation was great. But for the love of God, don't you think you should be able to be funny in the year 3000 without winding the clock back? Geez, it's even worse than those Star Trek TOS and TNG time-travel-to-old-earth episodes.

    I'll miss Futurama, especially Bender, but I'm sure that Matt's twisted mind can come up with something equally good, if not even better, sometime soon. Farewell Zoiberg, I hardly GLLLBBLBBLLBLBL!!! ye.

    --

    Mr. Ska

    1. Re:let it go, it could have been done better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I found that it relied far, far, FAR, FAR too heavily on 20th/21st century references. What, living in the year 3000 can't stand on its own feet? Do you have to bring back millennium-old actors, politicians, celebrities, singers, and the like? It's a crutch, nothing more."

      No, it's what made it funny. It was an updating of the 50s era SCI-FI "rockets to mars" space adventure. Plus the writers were from the simpsons, and masters of using pop-culture references. Pop culture references from the year 2000 are funny, plain and simple. Pop culture references from the year 3000 firstly don't exist, and then wouldn't be funny to us anyway :P

  218. Won't miss it by Anonymous+Codger · · Score: 1

    The first season of Futurama was terrific. I watched every episode and laughed my butt off. But since then it has been going downhill fast. It's seldom funny, and the level of cynicism has risen to the point that even I, a confirmed cynic, find my stomach knotting.

    On the other hand, I still sometimes watch the Simpsons and almost always find it funny and provocative. I wonder what happened to Groening to make his later work so dark?

    --
    No sig? Sigh...
    1. Re:Won't miss it by the_consumer · · Score: 1

      I wonder what happened to Groening to make his later work so dark?

      You're kidding, right? You want dark, try reading Life in Hell circa 1983. You'll have never laughed so hard about how shitty life can be.

      --
      "If you're thinking what I'm thinking, you're right." -
  219. Oh, thanks by Yer+Mom · · Score: 1

    I only just got that tune out of my head after watching that episode last week...

    --
    Never mind Spamassassin. When's Spammerassassin coming out?
  220. Boo hoo by PegQuin · · Score: 1

    Oh no, they're taking your favorite cartoon off the air?! You'd best organize a march on Fox--this must be stopped! How can these TV exec's be so ignorant? How can they be so insensitive? Holy shit, what's the world coming to?!!!

    --
    PegQuin--I've got a sneakin' suspicion
  221. Banner / button by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 2

    Could someone with a Gimp talent make a banner and a button to put on web sites? I think that would be a nice idea, now if we could just figure out a link we could point it to. :)

  222. I've seen the Simpsons DVD by Mynn · · Score: 1

    (gotta like Netflix) and it's pretty good, but not worth buying for me. What I'd like to see is a Simpsons DVD compendium of the Halloween Episodes. I'd pay almost as much for that as I would the Sopranos at the by-season-rate.

    Glad to hear that even if Futurama is cancelled (noooooo) they are going to do the DVD route. Futurama is a great example of computers being used to further illustrate and extend cartoons without overshadowing the plot or storyline simply because it is possible.

    --

    Face it, people are stupid, and the internet is the place where they all meet.
  223. FOX REGIONAL VP EMAIL ADDRESSES by swordboy · · Score: 2
    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
  224. Good Riddance by Boomer2 · · Score: 1

    What a stupid, pathetic show.

    Only its avid watchers are more pathetic.

    To its fans: "Get a life."

  225. I'll probably get flamed for this, but.... by timbck2 · · Score: 1

    Is that dreck still on the air? I honestly tried to give it a chance, and watched it 3 or 4 times when it first started -- it simply sucked. It wasn't funny, it just didn't have a point.

    In my opinion.

    --
    Absurdity: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion. -- Ambrose Bierce
    1. Re:I'll probably get flamed for this, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm with you. Just because a show is based in the future does not make it good. Futurama is just bad. Always has been. And I don't understand all the Malcolm bashing. That show is hilarious! As is The Family Guy.

  226. From Reuters/Variety by LittleGuy · · Score: 1

    Despite virtually no promotion and frequent preemptions, ``Futurama''has still managed to win its 7 p.m. Sunday slot this season in teens, adults 18-34 and adults 18-49. Executives at producer 20th Century Fox TV have already had early talks about launching the show in syndication, though no deals are close.

    Can you imagine what would happen if they actually supported the show?

    Then again, I wouldn't put too much hope in other networks. 'Inside Schwatrz' was cancelled with its 30 share because it lost half of the lead 60 share from 'Friends'.

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  227. MOD UP PARENT by jazmataz23 · · Score: 1

    Excellent suggestion. My faith is restored that if we all just slack off at work and put our minds to it, we can solve all the worlds problems; hunger, thermonuclear war, cancellation of quality shows, you name it.

    jaz

    --
    Death to Argument by Slogan!! (This post twice-encrypted with ROT-13. Replies not using same will be ignored)
  228. Bitch bitch bitch by DigitalDragon · · Score: 1

    Yeah.. Poor Futurama never got the chance.. it had a bad spot.. blah-blah-blah.. Futurama was/is not so good in the first place. I know I am going to get modded down for that, but here goes the rant:

    Yes Futurama is funny, especially the first episodes, but after awhile it lost its edge - last week they showed 5 episodes back to back instead of Saturday Night Live and I've tryed watching them (most of them were new for me - I stopped watching them half a year ago). Anyways, I could not sit through them, they got absolutely boring, all jokes are weak and similar: Bender is saying 'ass' and drinks and smokes and steals, Fry is dumb pizza boy, and so on. They only ones that are funny are: Zoidberg, professor, and Leela is just hot.

    Family Guy has a bad spot, but it is the funniest show there is at this moment - they are well into their fourth season and they have not lost their edge. You can feel how much thought and preparation goes into every episode.

    Anyways, just my .2

    --
    http://dtum.livejournal.com
  229. A better show that should have been saved by jdavidb · · Score: 2

    I hate Futurama. I guess I'm the only one. But I can't believe people have a letter writing campaign for this, but nobody did anything about The Lone Gunmen. That was the funniest show I've seen in a long time. Sure the pilot wasn't that good (did anyone besides me notice how eerily similar the plot of the pilot was to the September 11 attacks? or am I the only one who actually watched it?), but it got better.



    Sigh.

    1. Re:A better show that should have been saved by raindr · · Score: 1

      Your not alone! Get a life people! sheesh

      --
      Things Are The Way They Are
    2. Re:A better show that should have been saved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Lone Gunmen was terrible. I thought the pilot was the only good episode. The rest of the shows were just the same characters repeating the same lines over and over and over. It was pure shit.

  230. Only sign if you are a Nielsen family by Tom7 · · Score: 2

    Guess what? Fox has no idea whether I watch Futurama or not. They only know aggregate data collected from Nielsen participants.

    The point is -- they already know how many people watch it. Maybe they just need to know how many rabid fans there are...

    But anyway, I actually do hope these petitions for TV shows go away. I like TV sometimes, but anybody who's in love with a show so much to make a petition about it ... well, they need to watch less TV.

  231. There's a reason! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a good reason why networks cancel shows man, CAUSE THEY SUCK!!!! That's the dumbest cartoon (well maybe not) I've ever seen!

  232. you're kidding me - you care about network tv? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't believe anybody cares about _any_ program on network tv. All programming sucks harder than Tracy Lords. I have yet to see a single episode of anything on the majors that was anything other than mind numbing crapola. Enjoy!

  233. Balanced Petitions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where is the petition to keep Futurama off the air?

  234. How do they know we are watching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do the FOX execs know that anyone is watching. I have never been asked what I watch. has anyone in here ever been a Neilsen family:-)

  235. they did that already by mikemulvaney · · Score: 2

    Perhaps FOX should switch the timeslots of Futurama and Malcolm in the Middle for, say, a month.

    Futurama came on after the Simpsons for at least the first full season. And guess what? No one watched it.

    Just face it: more people like Malcolm in the Middle, for God knows what reason. And more people like That 70's Show, and more people like Boston Public, and more people like Ally McBeal, and more people like to watch football. Futurama is a niche show, and regardless of how good it is, Fox doesn't have to show it if no one is going to watch it.

    Futurama wasn't killed by its bad time slot; it died well before that. We were lucky that they kept showing it as long they did...

    -Mike

  236. Re: Time slot by Don+Keehotay · · Score: 1

    I think Fox put Futurama in that slot specifically to kill it. They wanted another Simpsons, and Matt wouldn't kneel for them (IMO).

    Futurama's way too adult to be on so early - I don't even let my 10-year-old watch it.

    !!! Maybe Cartoon Network will pick it up and add it to the "Adult Swim" lineup. I feel a petition coming on...

    --
    U.S. Democracy: born 7/4/1776, died 12/12/2000 R.I.P.
  237. TOO LATE by Funk_dat69 · · Score: 1

    I think it's true that is didn't have enough advertising. I loved the show but it hopped around so much I never knew when it was gonna be on.

    Anyway, it's TOO LATE. My good friend know some of the animators on that show and they are all already laid off. Futurama: R.I.P.

    --
    FUNK!
  238. Your REASONS ARE IRRELIVANT by bitrott · · Score: 1

    Fox doesn't like Futurama for ONE REASON ALONE - They don't own it. Groening(sp?) does. They only buy it. For futurama to defect to Cartoon Network would be a real coup, but not impossible.

  239. Rocky and Bullwinkle by 2ms · · Score: 1

    As long as I can always watch the original Rocky and Bullwinkle animated series, I'm in heaven. For those of you who haven't revisited R & B since you were too young to catch its humor, do. Nothing else even comes close.

  240. http://moon.nnyconline.de/- Fut epcode translator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Admittedly this is a shameless plug but considering the large amount of Futurama fans I regularly meet on IRC that still don't know of my page I thought I'd take a chance at this place to advertise it since the audience here seems to fit very well:

    On my page you'll get a full listing of all Futurama/Family Guy airdates, episode codes, nfos and episode synopsis.

    Currently I'm thinking about moving the synopsises (sp?) to seperate files so that the page loads as fast as it used to. Comments & flames welcome. Be reasonable though ;)

  241. Surely they didn't cancel because of the ratings.. by Control-Z · · Score: 1

    ..because on the East Coast over the last 6 months, I bet they haven't shown 3 episodes! No wonder the ratings were bad! Futurama was supposed to be on at 7, but every Sunday night I would turn on the TV at 6:45 and there was a football game with 15 minutes or so left. When you translate Football Time to Real Time, it's like a 1:3 ratio, 45 minutes at least. So I knew there was no way I was going to see Futurama, maybe not even King of the Hill.

    You don't suppose FOX compares the Futurama rating on the same chart with shows that were shown in all time zones and not pre-empted by football? That's so stupid it might be true...

  242. test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    test

  243. Great show, not on enough. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because its on once a week (for all that i know) if i miss it i dont get a chance to see it again till next week which sucks. Dont cancel it put it on MORE!

  244. FOX is the greatest....FOR ME TO POOP ON! by very · · Score: 1

    Remember that FOX is the same network that aired:
    WHO WANTS TO MARRY A MILLIONARE
    TEMPTATION ISLAND
    WHEN THE (fill in the blank) ATTACK
    GREED
    THE CHAMBER
    etc.......

    If only Al Gore won the 2000 election, maybe they FOX wouldn't dare to cancel FUTURAMA........
    It's the ties that bind.

    "MR. GW Bush, please issue a presidential mandate to keep FOX from cancelling FUTURAMA!"

  245. football by Uber+KruX · · Score: 1

    i dont know about other locations, but here on Long Island (EST) football usually ran over futurama's time slot. i rememebr several occasions when i was screaming "2 MINUTES IN FOOTBALL LASTS HALF A F*CKING HOUR"

  246. PBS? by Compenguin · · Score: 1

    What about targeting it towards PBS stations? They have had some really funny stuff like Red Dwarf.

  247. The spelling-challenged demographic by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    Maybe the petition will encourage the dictionary and spellcheck manufacturers to advertise on Futurama.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  248. Dark Angel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will someone just do what the viewers (horny males) really want and put this show out as adult videos? Don't tell me you don't picture her full lips doing very dirty things.

  249. It is just a TV show by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    I find it a bit sad that people will freak out and become activists over a TV show but don't bat an eyelash when the US rejects the International Land Mine Treaty or decides to boost defense spending to Cold War levels (enjoy paying for that next Apr 15). I wish people could at least give equal time to far more important things.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  250. Next on FOX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is Al-Queda molesting your children at YOUR DAYCARE!? A special fear mongering broadcast tonight on FOX "news".

  251. Not Cancelled!!!! by geekoid · · Score: 2

    It seems that fox has a back log of 30 futurama episodes, that is why it chose night to sign to make more for next year.
    Also, Matt owns the series, not FOX, so if fox cancel, there is always hope that it will get pick up else where.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  252. Re:Futurama IS a knockoff---No it isn't! by jinushaun · · Score: 1

    Similar music, animation, style etc.. is only due to the fact that they're both Matt Groening creations! If you've read his other stuff, like Life from Hell, you see what I mean. Also, studio execs like ot save money, why wouldn't they recycle some of the simpsons resources.

    When my friends and I first saw futurama, we all thought the same thing: Simpsons 3000 without a Homer. But the more I watch it, the more I realise it has a character and unique charm of its own.