i've never been informed of a problem with screen readers and tables as structural.... are the columns dynamically sized or something? (PS using DOM2 you can write the javascript code to to that in a way that works across browsers)
government is only public sector if you're a government employee - we supply software for egovernment, but we are a for-profit publically traded company.
3 columns of equal length, no javascript, with ADA compliance? easy - all you need is tables for that, you don't even HAVE to get into CSS (althought doing it with CSS is cleaner).
first for something to be slander it has to be untrue second you're lying again - everything following the second question mark.. i only "slander" idiots who cannot argue honestly
WTF 8?! what does an 8 year old need a cellphone for - I had one when I was 16, and I rarely used it - most I used it for was talking to my girlfriend one my way home from work at the time, and the occasional "yo $parent i'm going to X, don't expect me till Y", and for emergencies when my buddies and I were out rock climbing (only needed to use it once for this purpose - once too many, but then 10 year old little brothers don't always listen to their dad, their older brother, and their older brothers friend all take turns lecturing them about being careful)
maybe by knowing what you're doing?! I work in the private sector as well, infact e-government, and all our websites work in both and we EXPLICITLY develope on firefox - all our developers are running linux (most of us fedora) on our workstations - we use laptops and non-developer computers for IE testing
if they hadn't been retards and used microsoft-hax and used standards compliant multi-browser html/css and javascript they wouldn't have a problem.
in otherwords: it's their own fucking fault, you code to a vendor-specific set in a non-vendor-specific world you're subject to the whims of that vendor
A) You're wrong, miller-urey were right, their initial findings were based off one model of earths early atmosphere - then they fell out of favor because they learned that there may have been a concentration of a certain gas that would have inhibited the reaction, but then they learned that the atmosphere bled off that gas quicker than they thought so infact the final mixture they came up with was EVEN MORE CONDUCIVE to miller-urey being right, apperently YOU didn't read the article
NOR IS MILLER-UREY THE ONLY POSSIBLE EXPLAINATION!
B) The lack of belief in religion has nothing to do with the validity of abiogenesis C) You just misrepresented the beliefs of the anti-evolution creationists to attempt to further your argument, sorry I don't deal with liars
Evolution deniers should have to go without the benefits that the knowledge of evolution have gained us....
people who attack science wholesale should do likewise, but be denied the benefits of all science
mwahah poetic justice. You want to live without science? Be our guest! Give me your internet connection, oh you're computer too, cell phone, car, house since it relied on modern engineering, you cannot use medicine, ooops no roads either,....
Actually, most of the creationists' argument is that something as complicated as DNA could not possibly arise spontaneously, and must have been designed.
Which is demonstrably false, but don't tell them that - their head may explode as you explain to them that they misunderstand the 2nd law of thermodynamics
because these uneducated fools are manipulated by politicians into supporting candidates that will legislate their religion (and ARE), manipulate the supreme court, and generally supress the rights of non-christians
no, stating that it is not "alive" is a simplification for "is not it's OWN life" - until it's viably it's OWN life without the aid of modern medical technology it is entirely dependant on it's mothers body and is not a life of it's own - it is a leech upon the mothers life. Anythong that is not a life of it's own cannot have rights (it has them retroactively once it becomes life of it's own).
Sorry, your anti-abortion bullshit is simply a manipulation of statements and a misunderstanding of bioethics
it also brings war (death and destruction), bigotry against people not of your group (legislating anti-gay, supporting anti-atheist groups), hatred, ignorance, hinders progress, etc
there are a lot of chemical reactions where "life can arise from non-life" given the proper conditions, conditions which were present on *gasp* early earth!
Slashdot Mirror
i've never been informed of a problem with screen readers and tables as structural.... are the columns dynamically sized or something? (PS using DOM2 you can write the javascript code to to that in a way that works across browsers)
sunspots are actually cool points on the surface of the sun, hence them being comparatively dark
div's + CSS (wtfh is the professors problem with tables?)
government is only public sector if you're a government employee - we supply software for egovernment, but we are a for-profit publically traded company.
3 columns of equal length, no javascript, with ADA compliance? easy - all you need is tables for that, you don't even HAVE to get into CSS (althought doing it with CSS is cleaner).
first for something to be slander it has to be untrue
second you're lying again - everything following the second question mark.. i only "slander" idiots who cannot argue honestly
nobody, there is no who, the formation of the earth was a naturally occuring phenominae - thank you gravity
apparently you're not familiar with the entire stolen sidekick thing are you? http://www.stolensidekick.com/
WTF 8?! what does an 8 year old need a cellphone for - I had one when I was 16, and I rarely used it - most I used it for was talking to my girlfriend one my way home from work at the time, and the occasional "yo $parent i'm going to X, don't expect me till Y", and for emergencies when my buddies and I were out rock climbing (only needed to use it once for this purpose - once too many, but then 10 year old little brothers don't always listen to their dad, their older brother, and their older brothers friend all take turns lecturing them about being careful)
maybe by knowing what you're doing?! I work in the private sector as well, infact e-government, and all our websites work in both and we EXPLICITLY develope on firefox - all our developers are running linux (most of us fedora) on our workstations - we use laptops and non-developer computers for IE testing
then you're inept, i do it every single day.
if they hadn't been retards and used microsoft-hax and used standards compliant multi-browser html/css and javascript they wouldn't have a problem.
in otherwords: it's their own fucking fault, you code to a vendor-specific set in a non-vendor-specific world you're subject to the whims of that vendor
Pigs are flying, .....
Kazan has the goose that laid the golden egg,
Bush admits to breaking the law
that's because your very weak and dishonest mind cannot seperate "process of evolution" from "history of evolution"
A) You're wrong, miller-urey were right, their initial findings were based off one model of earths early atmosphere - then they fell out of favor because they learned that there may have been a concentration of a certain gas that would have inhibited the reaction, but then they learned that the atmosphere bled off that gas quicker than they thought so infact the final mixture they came up with was EVEN MORE CONDUCIVE to miller-urey being right, apperently YOU didn't read the article
NOR IS MILLER-UREY THE ONLY POSSIBLE EXPLAINATION!
B) The lack of belief in religion has nothing to do with the validity of abiogenesis
C) You just misrepresented the beliefs of the anti-evolution creationists to attempt to further your argument, sorry I don't deal with liars
horseshit, we're using it in prod every freaking day no problems - just test your freaking updates before you roll them to prod
(oh BTW - our prod COULDN'T FUNCTION without 2.6 nor would we have even tried to use 2.6 even if it could have)
Evolution deniers should have to go without the benefits that the knowledge of evolution have gained us....
....
people who attack science wholesale should do likewise, but be denied the benefits of all science
mwahah poetic justice. You want to live without science? Be our guest! Give me your internet connection, oh you're computer too, cell phone, car, house since it relied on modern engineering, you cannot use medicine, ooops no roads either,
Actually, most of the creationists' argument is that something as complicated as DNA could not possibly arise spontaneously, and must have been designed.
Which is demonstrably false, but don't tell them that - their head may explode as you explain to them that they misunderstand the 2nd law of thermodynamics
because these uneducated fools are manipulated by politicians into supporting candidates that will legislate their religion (and ARE), manipulate the supreme court, and generally supress the rights of non-christians
no, stating that it is not "alive" is a simplification for "is not it's OWN life" - until it's viably it's OWN life without the aid of modern medical technology it is entirely dependant on it's mothers body and is not a life of it's own - it is a leech upon the mothers life. Anythong that is not a life of it's own cannot have rights (it has them retroactively once it becomes life of it's own).
Sorry, your anti-abortion bullshit is simply a manipulation of statements and a misunderstanding of bioethics
who supposedly lived approximately 2000 years ago and some other guys even older
it also brings war (death and destruction), bigotry against people not of your group (legislating anti-gay, supporting anti-atheist groups), hatred, ignorance, hinders progress, etc
the big bang has hard facts backing it up, infact it was postulated based off hard facts
... more things
A) all Galaxies are all diverging from the same point
B) background radiation
Time didn't exist before the bing bang btw - time can only be defined in terms of change
to say that "god" and "big bang" are both at the same level of supportability is simply dishonest.
Wikipedia is your friend, biased language is not.
there are a lot of chemical reactions where "life can arise from non-life" given the proper conditions, conditions which were present on *gasp* early earth!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenesis
Evolution describes how life changes, it has NOTHING to do with how life began.
Seriously.....
They've pulled stuff that specific out of their ass in the past