The documents were forged - but the person who actually typed up the REAL DOCUMENTS said the REAL OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS said the same thing the forged documents did.
Let's say that again the "forged" documents said the same thing the "real" documents did - just with different exact words and different typeface
wow/it's not like they intentionally ran with bad documents they were DECEIVED.. you know.. just like congress has been
i commonly refer to the window of a TCP/IP connection. (In a sentance: "He needs to increase his window size for better networking performance") I commonly refer to any self-contained GUI frame containing other objects "a window" - the plural of this would be "windows" - "man, he's got a lot of windows up on his screen."
You don't have to sacrifice stability of security if you wall of binary-only drivers from sensative areas - granting them access ONLY to what they need to access.
Access is requested via an API call - requests resources - and logs the requests and assigns them.
If a driver attempts to write outside it's space - blammo denied.
If a driver attempts to read outside it's space - blammo denied.
Driver stops responding - Blammo killed.
"Evolution.... It isn't a proven fact nor is it even supported a tremendous weight of evidence."
It's supported by an incredible ammount of evidence - infact modern biological science doesn't make sense without evolution. We have seen evolution occur, we have caused evolution to occur - a fundmental mechanism required for evolution to occur was discovered and described BY A MONK years ago!. He described genetic inheritance!
I want one of your "scientific examples of data that contradict the theory of evolution". You're probably thinking of the "history of speciation" which is still under revision and not actually thinking of evolution. "In biology, evolution is the process by which populations of organisms acquire and pass on novel traits from generation to generation, affecting the overall makeup of the population and even leading to the emergence of new species."
To call NPR biased and to ignore my statements about various news stations because they don't agree with your bias is ludacris - go look up the specific study i was referencing for my statistics
oh wait - lemme get you a link to the PDF because i know you're too lazy to factcheck yourself
It's been proven my repeated indepenant studies that Fox News is so biased and mixes opinion and news so freely [intentionally] that they have engendered inaccurate knowledge in 80% of their viewers.
People who watch fox news have been shown to be less accurately inclined about the real world than people who watch/listen to BBC American, PBS, NPR
Infact ABC/CBS/NBC aren't too much better than Fox - and you know all the factually inaccuracies they push off favor the administration's positions.
For example in one quite pointed study about misconceptions and support of the Iraq war three questions were asked - and the more of them they got wrong the more likely they were to be the following A) Supporters of the war B) Fox news viewers
the ERA is a clairification and reiteration of rights already in the constitution so that certain doublespeaking individuals who claim to support the constitutions origional intent have zero wiggle room
the "higher creator" introduces additional, unneeded, complexity to the system and simply begs the question of "Where did we come from" because additional complexity must be explained.
Just because an individual is smarter than you in one field doesn't mean they're any more or less immune to the mental compartmentalization process required to become religious than you.
Religion is a strongly neurochemically addictive entity as it evokes "joyful feelings" which are your positive-reward-neurotransmitters which you are naturally addicted to. Addictive drugs emulate/cause the release of these and that's one of the reasons why they are addictive.
Most religious individuals I have argued with follow the same exact pattern of argument as drug addicts in my not-so-small expirience.
Tehre is no double standard - just a poorly worded standard that was put to words by the mediocre not the experts.
"Software wants to be free" doesn't mean "software doesn't want it's author to be credited with it's production", and it doesn't mean "software wants it's licensing agreements violated". More like software "wants it to be licensed on a free-basis". You give away the software, and sell the support. That's more-or-less what the company I work at does. We're a state contractor (that's our exclusive thing) - we write all the apps for free, and many of them don't generate revenue. We get our revenue from transaction fees on some of on the software.
yes writing applications ontop of KDE and Gnome requires using different system libraries that have incompatable APIs
IIRC
I always use wxWidgets.
You also want the presentation of your controls to be as similiar as possible. Take these two images for example - they're both the same app that i'm working on - one is on windows/wxWin and linux/wxGTK
I was talking about conditions in which competition are taking place - monopolies are _supposed_ to get smacked down by the government when they engage in anticompetetive practices. It's time to stop granting government-sanctioned monopolies and start enforcing the anti-monopoly laws
we all know that's going to happen under the current regime at the same time hell freezes over
You've been hoodwinked - competition would not drive the price below profitable levels - becuase it wouldn't be feasable for ANY company to do so. Now one companies profitable price may be unmatchable by another company: sucks to be that dumbass company who cannot compete.
Competition drives innovation, and lowers prices - it also forces the inept and the profiteering out of the market.
Slashdot Mirror
The documents were forged - but the person who actually typed up the REAL DOCUMENTS said the REAL OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS said the same thing the forged documents did. Let's say that again the "forged" documents said the same thing the "real" documents did - just with different exact words and different typeface wow /it's not like they intentionally ran with bad documents they were DECEIVED.. you know.. just like congress has been
I think you're nuts... but that's just me.
.. i got karma to burn - but if you mod me troll you must mod him troll too.
This has nothing to do with the US or any tit-for-tat. I think you're seeing leftist monsters in the closet.
go ahead.. mod me troll
Screw MS MCE - Use http://www.mythtv.org/
The problem is if they adopt that business model and stop using their old one someone else will come along and just fill the niche.
or OSS will fill the niche.
yes it is [a generic term]
i commonly refer to the window of a TCP/IP connection. (In a sentance: "He needs to increase his window size for better networking performance")
I commonly refer to any self-contained GUI frame containing other objects "a window" - the plural of this would be "windows" - "man, he's got a lot of windows up on his screen."
Excuse me? Mike Rowe was lucky?
M$ has no right to claim someone's name as theirs no matter how similiar sounding it is.
They stole from that guy plane and simple.
"Consumers could reasonably assume that "Windows Defender" was affiliated with MS based on the name alone"
No, they couldn't.
The could reasonably assume it was a piece of software For windows
2+ years old is not acceptable for desktop usage or gaming usage
Latest hardware NOW is the rule
You don't have to sacrifice stability of security if you wall of binary-only drivers from sensative areas - granting them access ONLY to what they need to access. Access is requested via an API call - requests resources - and logs the requests and assigns them. If a driver attempts to write outside it's space - blammo denied. If a driver attempts to read outside it's space - blammo denied. Driver stops responding - Blammo killed.
"Evolution .... It isn't a proven fact nor is it even supported a tremendous weight of evidence."
It's supported by an incredible ammount of evidence - infact modern biological science doesn't make sense without evolution. We have seen evolution occur, we have caused evolution to occur - a fundmental mechanism required for evolution to occur was discovered and described BY A MONK years ago!. He described genetic inheritance!
I want one of your "scientific examples of data that contradict the theory of evolution". You're probably thinking of the "history of speciation" which is still under revision and not actually thinking of evolution. "In biology, evolution is the process by which populations of organisms acquire and pass on novel traits from generation to generation, affecting the overall makeup of the population and even leading to the emergence of new species."
an EE here at work says you can fit multiple bits into a sinewave - the more you try to cram into a single cycle the elss flexible it becomes
To call NPR biased and to ignore my statements about various news stations because they don't agree with your bias is ludacris - go look up the specific study i was referencing for my statistics
4 /Report10_21_04.pdf
oh wait - lemme get you a link to the PDF because i know you're too lazy to factcheck yourself
http://www.pipa.org/OnlineReports/Pres_Election_0
Wow.. you are spewing seven types of BS
It's been proven my repeated indepenant studies that Fox News is so biased and mixes opinion and news so freely [intentionally] that they have engendered inaccurate knowledge in 80% of their viewers.
People who watch fox news have been shown to be less accurately inclined about the real world than people who watch/listen to BBC American, PBS, NPR
Infact ABC/CBS/NBC aren't too much better than Fox - and you know all the factually inaccuracies they push off favor the administration's positions.
For example in one quite pointed study about misconceptions and support of the Iraq war three questions were asked - and the more of them they got wrong the more likely they were to be the following
A) Supporters of the war
B) Fox news viewers
[Ref: PIPA]
the ERA is a clairification and reiteration of rights already in the constitution so that certain doublespeaking individuals who claim to support the constitutions origional intent have zero wiggle room
And you have the complexity issue - "god" that just exists or "universe" that just exists universe is less complex
the "higher creator" introduces additional, unneeded, complexity to the system and simply begs the question of "Where did we come from" because additional complexity must be explained. Just because an individual is smarter than you in one field doesn't mean they're any more or less immune to the mental compartmentalization process required to become religious than you. Religion is a strongly neurochemically addictive entity as it evokes "joyful feelings" which are your positive-reward-neurotransmitters which you are naturally addicted to. Addictive drugs emulate/cause the release of these and that's one of the reasons why they are addictive. Most religious individuals I have argued with follow the same exact pattern of argument as drug addicts in my not-so-small expirience.
If i get to meta-moderate that post i'm meta-moderating the moderator: retard
I've never had a problem with Fedora
Nice Troll what exactly are you calling Archaic in linux?
And completely unsuitable for production servers.
Tehre is no double standard - just a poorly worded standard that was put to words by the mediocre not the experts. "Software wants to be free" doesn't mean "software doesn't want it's author to be credited with it's production", and it doesn't mean "software wants it's licensing agreements violated". More like software "wants it to be licensed on a free-basis". You give away the software, and sell the support. That's more-or-less what the company I work at does. We're a state contractor (that's our exclusive thing) - we write all the apps for free, and many of them don't generate revenue. We get our revenue from transaction fees on some of on the software.
that's exactly what i said
yes writing applications ontop of KDE and Gnome requires using different system libraries that have incompatable APIs
IIRC
I always use wxWidgets.
You also want the presentation of your controls to be as similiar as possible. Take these two images for example - they're both the same app that i'm working on - one is on windows/wxWin and linux/wxGTK
POF Constructor Suite 2.x Alpha build 20050902 Win32
POF Constructor Suite 2.x Alpha build 20050919 Linux
You'll notice the data editor panel in the lower left hand corner has marked alignment issues under linux/wxGTK (it also has them under linux/wxX11).
I was talking about conditions in which competition are taking place - monopolies are _supposed_ to get smacked down by the government when they engage in anticompetetive practices. It's time to stop granting government-sanctioned monopolies and start enforcing the anti-monopoly laws
we all know that's going to happen under the current regime at the same time hell freezes over
You've been hoodwinked - competition would not drive the price below profitable levels - becuase it wouldn't be feasable for ANY company to do so. Now one companies profitable price may be unmatchable by another company: sucks to be that dumbass company who cannot compete.
Competition drives innovation, and lowers prices - it also forces the inept and the profiteering out of the market.