Slashdot Mirror


Sex.com Hijacker Captured in Mexico

Revvy wrote to mention that Stephen Cohen has finally been brought to justice. From the article: "Cohen, a multiple felon and longtime con man, had been on the run since before 2001, when a judge ordered him to pay a San Francisco entrepreneur for hijacking the Internet address Sex.com. In 1995, Cohen forged a letter to Internet authorities to gain control of the address, which he transformed into a highly profitable site for pornography ads. Cohen, who had been living in a Tijuana mansion, was arrested on an immigration violation by Mexican authorities and turned over to agents of the U.S. Border Patrol, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Marshals Service, according to Deputy Marshal Tania Tyler."

252 comments

  1. Mr. Cohen by ChrisF79 · · Score: 5, Funny

    From sex.com to prisonrape.com. A fitting end to this story.

    --
    Finance tutorials and more! Understandfinance
    1. Re:Mr. Cohen by bhsurfer · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes indeed. It's about time that a little bit of integrity was brought back to the porn industry. This is a victory for us all.

      --
      Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.
      Groucho Marx
    2. Re:Mr. Cohen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL

    3. Re:Mr. Cohen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rape of women is never funny. Rape of male prisoners is pure hilarity! Its really really funny. Ha ha ha kind of funny!

    4. Re:Mr. Cohen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      p\/\/3d.

    5. Re:Mr. Cohen by SandMonkey · · Score: 1

      Yup this is a great day for the whole industry.. viva la sex.com... Took them long enough though...

      --
      Schrodinger's cat- A cat is put in a sealed box. Attached to which is a radioactive nucleus and a canister of poison gas
    6. Re:Mr. Cohen by dextromulous · · Score: 1
      A fitting end to this story.
      Funny, I heard that's what his cell-mate said!
      --
      There are two types of people in the world: those who divide people into two types and those who don't.
    7. Re:Mr. Cohen by blackmonday · · Score: 1

      C'mon man, he was just looking for the donkey show. Cut him some slack.

    8. Re:Mr. Cohen by IAmTheDave · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hmm... if I could hijack this "prisionrape.com" I may be able to make a killing, and get that mansion in Tijuana the girlfriend has been asking about...

      I mean, hell, I'll be in Mexico. I'll be safe from prosecution, right?

      --
      Excuse my speling.
      Making The Bar Project
    9. Re:Mr. Cohen by DFarmerTX · · Score: 1

      A "Tijuana mansion"?

      Is that like a "Colombian Necktie"?

      I think that means a cardboard box under an overpass somewhere.

      -DF

    10. Re:Mr. Cohen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's his place pre-Wilma, though... (it went right over Naples)

  2. If he's so rich .... by qwave54 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    couldn't he have just paid off the right people in the Mexican government to get them to look the other way??

    1. Re:If he's so rich .... by Marthisdil · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Probably so - he's just showing how stupid he is. He didn't go far enough away from the US.

    2. Re:If he's so rich .... by TrappedByMyself · · Score: 4, Insightful

      couldn't he have just paid off the right people in the Mexican government to get them to look the other way??

      Maybe he did? If they turn him in, they get the money AND brownie points with the US.

      --

      Help me take back Slashdot. When did 'News for Nerds' become 'FUD and Conspiracy Theories for Extremist Nutjobs'?
    3. Re:If he's so rich .... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      Must have blown it all on the Mansion, I say. Or his dog took a crap on the wrong person's lawn one too many times.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    4. Re:If he's so rich .... by KE1LR · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Probably he stopped paying.

    5. Re:If he's so rich .... by Asic+Eng · · Score: 4, Funny

      Looks like there are some people in the mexican government who can't be bought.

    6. Re:If he's so rich .... by c_forq · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That's what I was thinking. I had a friend arrested in Mexico before, and after being loaded into the patrol car they gave him a couple options (in English): to go to the jail, be processed, and spend some time behind bars, or to stop at an ATM and make a withdrawl. He chose the ATM, and joined us again about 30 minutes after being arrested, but now down about $200.

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
    7. Re:If he's so rich .... by Jonny_eh · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ya, but if they turn in a guy paying bribes, the bribes stop!

      Haven't you ever done this before?

    8. Re:If he's so rich .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      I had a friend arrested in Mexico before
      Would you like to re-phrase that? dont think many would be your pal afterwards..
    9. Re:If he's so rich .... by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Funny

      He chose the ATM, and joined us again about 30 minutes after being arrested, but now down about $200.

      I think you're painting a very unfair portrait of Mexican law enforcement, here. They are far, far more reasonable than that. Typically, $100 will do fine, and they're now taking PayPal if you have web access on your cell phone - but those Mexican roaming charges make prison a serious option.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    10. Re:If he's so rich .... by idontgno · · Score: 4, Funny

      Looks more like there are some people in the Mexican government who can't stay bought.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    11. Re:If he's so rich .... by rjshields · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ahh well, he could probably afford it. The police in Mexico get paid peanuts, hence the corruption. Gringos are an easy target.

      --
      In this world nothing is certain but death, taxes and flawed car analogies.
    12. Re:If he's so rich .... by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1



      Looks like there are some people in the mexican government who can't be bought. (Score:5, Funny)

      Vewwy Vewwy interesting.

    13. Re:If he's so rich .... by rjshields · · Score: 2, Funny

      My (mexican) friend paid 10 pesos to get out of a traffic offense. I guess you paid gringo prices...

      --
      In this world nothing is certain but death, taxes and flawed car analogies.
    14. Re:If he's so rich .... by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Here's some good advice to remember: if you're ever arrested in a foreign country (not Canada or Western Europe though...) a good thing to do is to ask the police to recommend a lawyer for you. They will give you the name of someone that they "work well" with. The lawyer will split his fee with the police, and you'll be free to get your ass to the airport ASAP.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    15. Re:If he's so rich .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...speaking of conspiracy theories

    16. Re:If he's so rich .... by Basilius · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think, by definition, if they guys he bribed turned him in they weren't the right guys.

    17. Re:If he's so rich .... by ifwm · · Score: 1

      It was 40 bucks for me (no kidding) but I was on a road trip through a less populated region.

    18. Re:If he's so rich .... by Impotent_Emperor · · Score: 1

      That's the best part. They can just seize all his assets in Mexico!

    19. Re:If he's so rich .... by Sun+Rider · · Score: 1

      He obviously got scared. The trick is to look cool, even bored, offer a low amount. They'll start slowly circling toward the police station, will finally get bored and accept your offer. I say 50 dlls would have been fine.

      If you ever find one of those cops that don't take money, don't worry, they won't add charges for you trying to bribe them, and don't panic, if you're a non-violent ofender you'll be in a cell with other non-violent drunken drivers, etc, you won't be raped; when out of the cell however you'll stink like hell, hygienic conditions are very poor.

      If you loose control and beat up a local police officer, you'll have to spend 15 days in the local jail and be in a cell with other violent detainees, and depending on the population you might have to watch out for your ass.

      I'm talking about the city's police. If you get in problems with federal agents (Policia Judicial), then be very careful, politely refuse everything and ask for your lawyer, if they refuse, mention the "Comision de Derechos Humanos" (Human Rights Comission).

      With these Judiciary guys you have to be very careful, until recently they were basically a bunch of torturers, killers, rapists, extorters, and it used to be that the governments and the legal establishment supported their behavior. Recently we've seen some change, still, be careful, don't believe anything they say, and get a lawyer. They only intervene in bigger stuff like drug traffic, robbery, murders, etc, they don't deal with traffic, street brawls, drinking driving, etc.

    20. Re:If he's so rich .... by Pentavirate · · Score: 1

      was arrested on an immigration violation by Mexican authorities and turned over to agents of the U.S. Border Patrol

      It looks like even Mexico handles immigration violations better than the US does.

    21. Re:If he's so rich .... by husker_man · · Score: 1


      It's not just the police, by the way.

      My company has some plants just over the border. I had to go out and meet with
      the systems administrators there. I was told that all I needed was my driver's
      license, and that I had to pay $20 for a work permit for the period that I was
      going to be there.

      Well, we get to the office on the Mexican side, and I find out that I need either
      a birth certificate and driver's license, or a passport. I didn't bring a birth
      certificate, and I didn't have a passport (I do now!!) The customs official said
      that I would have to go back over the border to a notary public and get an affidavit
      saying that I was born in the US, and that would suffice for him, but the cost at
      the office was going to be about $95.

      After a bit (I was chatting with a manager with me) the customs official came back
      wrote down the number 30 on a piece of paper, and walked away from us. We looked at
      each other, placed $30 on the counter by the piece of paper, and sort of turned away
      from the counter. The customs official came back, somehow the money dissappeared, he
      gave me the work permit and that was that.

      First time I have ever given a bribe of any sort.

    22. Re:If he's so rich .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "THEY gave him a couple options" $200 for two of 'em.

    23. Re:If he's so rich .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If you loose control"

      Fly, be free! LOLOLOL!!!!11!!!11one

    24. Re:If he's so rich .... by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Which is more compelling: Decent bribes or thousands of rifles, tanks and nuclear warheads controlled by the people who brought us "Vietnam: Middle East Edition"?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    25. Re:If he's so rich .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well your friends are stupid, I can buy Playboy from the corner newspaper stand.

    26. Re:If he's so rich .... by westyx · · Score: 1

      yeah, those nuclear warheads and tanks seem to stopping that illegal crossborder trade in drugs *real* well.

  3. Double standard? by DaHat · · Score: 0, Troll

    So the Mexican government doesn't mind its citizens running across the border into the US illegally... but does mind US nationals running down there?

    Yea... Vicente Fox is my personal hero for the rest of the month!

    1. Re:Double standard? by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 1

      It's only "illegal" to the US. The Mexican Govt. probably doesn't consider it illegal to go to another country at your own will. And on that note, the US govt. doesn't mind illegals as long as they pay taxes. Funny huh?

      --
      There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
    2. Re:Double standard? by DaHat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's a little more complicated than that. The Mexican government has gone out of its way to try to get special protections for Mexican nationals living and working (often illegally) in the US. Of course, this isn't surprising considering the Mexican economy heavily depends on the funds sent back home from workers in the US.

    3. Re:Double standard? by Detritus · · Score: 1

      From what I've read, the Mexican government doesn't care as long as you have money and don't cause trouble. If they think that they can score brownie points with the USA by expelling you, you have a problem.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    4. Re:Double standard? by Somegeek · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's no different than the way most western countries work. The US doesn't have laws or custom's officials to stop you from walking across the border into Canada or Mexico, it's just when you try to come back in that you have to go through US customs.

      FWIW, the Mexician government doesn't like its citizens coming up to the US any more than the US governemnt does; they are losing potiential workforce and it just looks bad for them.

      --
      And as you tread the halls of sanity, You feel so glad to be, Unable to go beyond. I have a message, From another time..
    5. Re:Double standard? by hey! · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh, yes, there's definitely a double standard in here somewhere. I mean, Mr. Cohen is a fugitive from justice while those braceros just want to send enough money back to their families so their kids can get ahead, but Mr. Cohen is rich. Rich guys with light skin shouldn't be treated as common criminals.

      As the inimitable Mr. Boortz would say, the rich are responsible for creating prosperity, not those dirty laborers creating cheap agricultural surpluses. You need only look at their relative pay and their value to society will be made plain. And so the first seats in the lifeboat should rightfully belong to the rich. You might go so far as to say that they are entitled to them. Don't you love that word "entitled"? It's so redolent of nobility (feudal nobility, not that sticky romantic kind). I also love the word "privelege": rich people have a privileged status in our society, because they are law unto themselves (privilege: form the latin prvus, single, alone + lx, lg-, law).

      Bringing the wealthy under the same laws as the rest of us is of course the ultimate double standard, because it takes so much more effort. We should expend the same effort on everybody, no matter what their ability and resources to evade are. It's cost efficient. You get many more people into prison that way. And everybody knows that the higher the number of people behind bars is, the greater your objectively measurable progress against crime is. We should not ask governments to make extra effort to bring the wealthy to account, when the result could only be fewer people in prison per dollar spent. As we've been told repeatedly, the government has too much "hard work" on its plate already. ...

      Excuse me, was I ranting?

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    6. Re:Double standard? by DaHat · · Score: 2, Informative

      FWIW, the Mexician government doesn't like its citizens coming up to the US any more than the US governemnt does; they are losing potiential workforce and it just looks bad for them.

      Unfortunately that is not true, hell, their economy depends upon the money being sent home from workers in the US.

      Add to that the fact that by having so many people leave the country, it actually benefits the government further by removing a large number of lower class persons who might just vote for the other guy in the next election or worse.

    7. Re:Double standard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The funny part is, the grandparent was marked insightful while being completely untrue. The mexican governement encourages their citizens to illegally go to the US. They give them instructions on how to do so.

    8. Re:Double standard? by Stone+Pony · · Score: 1
      Isn't that partly what the Mexican government is for?

      Don't you think that the US government tries to protect the rights of US citizens working abroad?

      Specifically, what do you think the guys in Mexico City, Ciudad Juarez, Guadalajara, Hermosillo, Matamoros, Monterrey, Nuevo Laredo, Puerto Vallarta and Tijuana are getting paid for? Only Russia plays host to as many US consulates.

    9. Re:Double standard? by ASCIIMan · · Score: 3, Informative

      From the parent:
      "FWIW, the Mexician government doesn't like its citizens coming up to the US any more than the US governemnt does; they are losing potiential workforce and it just looks bad for them."

      Really?

    10. Re:Double standard? by christoofar · · Score: 1

      Doubtful. There's not that many choices in Mexico except the PAN and the PRI. The PAN party has been historically week since the Revolution and probably will always will be. Mexico has a very skeptical culture and is very resistant to political change since the days of dictator after dictator.

      The fact that PAN managed to snag the presidency astounded everybody. Look for the PRI to win back that seat in the next election.

    11. Re:Double standard? by Nexx · · Score: 1

      Wow, there's a US Consulate in Tijuana? Considering San Diego is a very short jaunt away, I'd thought there wouldn't be one there. Interesting :)

    12. Re:Double standard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having lived abroad, let me tell you... the Consulate does not want to see you and is not interested in your problems. They exist to protect US business interests. Citizens are on their own.

    13. Re:Double standard? by oneiros27 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wow ... you're uninformed.

      You're right on the first point (they get a whole lot of money sent home), but you're wrong about the elections.

      Mexico changed its election laws this summer, so it now allows absentee ballots from the US

      --
      Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
    14. Re:Double standard? by HeavyD14 · · Score: 1

      Actually, since 9/11, the US has had officials at border crossings watching the people leaving. For me, they say "Are you an American citizen?" I say yes, and I can go on. Now if I were of another race, it might be more significant. But anyways, the point is there are people on the border.

    15. Re:Double standard? by Somegeek · · Score: 4, Informative
      That is not a document encouraging Mexicans to sneak into the US, think of it as a public safety manual. Many Mexicans are killed each year trying to do this and their government is being realistic and publishing a document to warn those who will inevitably attempt it of the dangers and how to mitigate them. It's like a program to distribute clean needles to drug addicts; it doesn't mean that you are promoting drug use, you know that its happening and are trying to mitigate some of the dangers it causes.

      You can also find the same document, with an english translation, distributed by a joint US/Mexican Government Commission, borderhealth.org. Does this mean that the US government is promoting illegal Mexican immigration into the US? No, and the existence of the document doesn't mean that Mexico is either, they are simply trying to protect their citizens, just as the US is.

      http://www.borderhealth.org/view_article.php?id=15 0

      --
      And as you tread the halls of sanity, You feel so glad to be, Unable to go beyond. I have a message, From another time..
    16. Re:Double standard? by hackstraw · · Score: 1
      ...any more than the US governemnt does

      And so perhaps the most promising element of President Bush's plan to reform the immigration system is his idea to, from this point forward, create 401(k)-type accounts where Mexican immigrant workers could invest part of their earnings. There the money would sit until the workers returned to Mexico, at which point they could draw it out. Bush's plan would put an end to the current system, and that's what hard-line conservatives hate about it. They're basically admitting that Social Security needs to rely on ill-gotten goods just to stay afloat.

      It's amazing. Some of the same people who are constantly complaining about how illegal immigrants are the ruin of the civilization, including some Republicans in Congress, have no more qualms about letting them continue to prop up Social Security.

      And people wonder why we have so much illegal immigration. Not me. I wonder why we don't have more of it.


      http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20050410/n ews_mz1e10ruben.html
    17. Re:Double standard? by Somegeek · · Score: 1
      Misleading. Please see my response to the same argument in this post:

      http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=16664 0&cid=13896515

      --
      And as you tread the halls of sanity, You feel so glad to be, Unable to go beyond. I have a message, From another time..
    18. Re:Double standard? by wolenczak · · Score: 1

      As well as the U.S. economy depends on foreign labour.

    19. Re:Double standard? by b1t+r0t · · Score: 1

      My brother is a tad dark skinned but still all white bread inside, and one time the family went down to Del Rio and walked over the border to go shopping. On the way back it was "Citizen... citizen... citizen... citizen?"

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    20. Re:Double standard? by slavemowgli · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It may be a double standard, but if it is, then it's the same double standard that the USA exposes, though. Think about it - the USA does have a problem with Mexicans entering the country illegally, but how much does it do to prevent US-Americans from illegally entering Mexico? Pretty much nothing.

      So, yes, Mexico may have double standards, but you're not exactly in a position to look down on them for it.

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    21. Re:Double standard? by whitehatlurker · · Score: 1
      I believe the double standard is
      • if one of your citizens does not break your laws, you're not generally concerned about where they go. You may be concerned if they do break laws elsewhere, but typically, you are expected to provide assistance to your citizens who run into trouble abroad. (This is why citizens should notify their embassy / consulate / whatever if they run afoul of the law abroad.)
      • if a known criminal comes into your country from (say) the US, you're concerned about what they may do in your country. There is also the consideration of extradition, if you have signed treaties with the country of origin.
      --
      .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
    22. Re:Double standard? by DaHat · · Score: 1

      I am well aware of their election law changes, as well as the ability for Mexican nationals within the US to go to official polling places in the US... the fact that they are elsewhere and with a higher quality of life makes political or social revolutions much less likely.

    23. Re:Double standard? by ifwm · · Score: 1

      You should be a politician.

      "you know that its happening and are trying to mitigate some of the dangers it causes."

      Then, instead of wasting their time with these types of things, perhaps they should try preventing the people from leaving, maybe by improving their country?

      The truth is far more sinister than you'll ever admit, but if nothing else own up to the fact that the Mexican government encourages it's citizens to go to the US.

    24. Re:Double standard? by Methlin · · Score: 1

      It is also in the bests interests of Mexico that the illegals don't die either. A dead worker doesn't send home any money.

    25. Re:Double standard? by hellraizr · · Score: 1

      hmmm.... looks like your mistaken.

      Government Sponsered Border Crossing Pamphlets

    26. Re:Double standard? by Methlin · · Score: 1
      Think about it - the USA does have a problem with Mexicans entering the country illegally, but how much does it do to prevent US-Americans from illegally entering Mexico?
      To do what, spend money being a tourist? Mexicans aren't entering USA daily in the morning and returning at night to go to Disneyland over and over again. Perhaps you're claiming there are strippers living in San Diego that cross the border every day to perform the donkey show in Tijuana?
    27. Re:Double standard? by hpavc · · Score: 1

      Correct the only thing they are supposed to do, according to the state department, is give you a list of lawyers that can help you and contact your family in the states.

      --
      members are seeing something, your seeing an ad
    28. Re:Double standard? by Somegeek · · Score: 1
      Two other posters already quoted that pamphlet.

      You can read my response in this posting:

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=166640&cid=138 96062

      And by the way, did you listen to that radio interview that you are linking to? It includes an interview with a high Mexican official who basically states what I surmised; that the pamphlet is an attempt to save some of the hundreds of lives that are lost each year when Mexicans try to cross the border into the US. It is not about encouraging illegal immigration into the US. It is also distributed by the US for the same reasons.

      --
      And as you tread the halls of sanity, You feel so glad to be, Unable to go beyond. I have a message, From another time..
    29. Re:Double standard? by deanoaz · · Score: 1

      >>> As well as the U.S. economy depends on foreign labour.

      This is an assertion that is often made, even in regard to illegal aliens. I'd like to see it proven one way or another. If illegals were rounded up and deported we'd soon find out if the country could still function or not.

      If it couldn't, which I seriously doubt, we could increase the LEGAL avenues for foreign workers to enter the U.S. for a limited time, under controlled conditions.

      "Cheer up! The worst effects of what we're doing won't be felt until after we're all dead" - Ashleigh Brilliant

      --
      If 'the people' in Amendment 2 are 'the state' then Amendments 1, 2, 4, 9, and 10 benefit the state, not you.
  4. Mr. Stephen Cohen, meet your new cellmate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would be Mr. Ben Dover. Bone appetit, mofo.

  5. The wheels of justice turn slow. by Trigun · · Score: 3, Insightful

    He was living in a MANSION in mexico. How hard did they even look for this guy.

    1. Re:The wheels of justice turn slow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The American government does not have jurisdiction in Mexico.

    2. Re:The wheels of justice turn slow. by Trigun · · Score: 1

      No, but they could have asked for the Mexican authorities to pick him up. A little diplomacy goes a long way, and it wouldn't be the first time that someone got picked up on trumped up charges in Mexico.

      Hey Taco, can I have the IP Ban lifted yet?

    3. Re:The wheels of justice turn slow. by DaHat · · Score: 1

      I thought that is why we had the SEALs... as well as Delta Force, Green Berets and other special forces groups.

    4. Re:The wheels of justice turn slow. by leuk_he · · Score: 1

      They had to hget the right Cohen...

      Not Bram Cohen (something abbour torrents...)
      Not Job Cohen (Amsterdamm== ... )
      not leonard cohen for distributing copyrighted material. (although he does have an license for his material....)

      well, some millions buy you a item low on this list.

    5. Re:The wheels of justice turn slow. by Walkiry · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure you do, but if you can get your neighbour to help you instead if breaking in and taking the guy yourself, you usually end up with a more friendly relationship between the countries governments. Respecting other countries' sovereignty is typically a good thing.

      --
      ---- Take the Space Quiz!
    6. Re:The wheels of justice turn slow. by m4dm4n · · Score: 2, Funny

      And don't forget Team America!

    7. Re:The wheels of justice turn slow. by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Well Mexican Authorities kinda needa crime with which to arrest someone. His offenses were committed in the United States, and there may not have been a clause in our treaty to extradite him.

      Pure guessing.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    8. Re:The wheels of justice turn slow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for a white collar criminal? uh sorry the specials forces, and any unit of the US military, have more pressing matters to attend to.

    9. Re:The wheels of justice turn slow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Violating other countries' sovereignty has never been a problem before or certianly right now..

    10. Re:The wheels of justice turn slow. by kawika · · Score: 1

      The military is supposed to get involved in domain disputes? Somehow I don't think the framers had sex.com in mind when they penned "provide for the common defense". Maybe it fits the "more perfect union" part.

    11. Re:The wheels of justice turn slow. by failure-man · · Score: 1

      It will be a problem at some point. If you're a bully now, and have a problem later, don't expect much help from those you've shat upon.

    12. Re:The wheels of justice turn slow. by AdamWeeden · · Score: 1

      there may not have been a clause in our treaty to extradite him.

      IANAL, but from what I've read there is extradition as long as the crime does not have a possibility for the death penalty (since Mexico does not have or support the death penalty).

      --
      I was quoted out of context in my autobiography...
    13. Re:The wheels of justice turn slow. by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      Still, you can only extradite someone after you arrested them - and you can only arrest them if there is a reason for it. And no, having committed a crime in another country is not automatically a reason (although it may be in the case of Mexico and the USA - I don't know the details here).

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    14. Re:The wheels of justice turn slow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In mexico only if you cheated SHCP (analogous to the U.S. IRS) you'd bet you'll be caught; otherwise It doesn't matter if you murdered a thousand of girls, if you roadkilled tens of children or old women in the street, as long as you can pay the fine (which keeps filthy & rich to the bureaucracy) you can live in front of the "Los pinos" (analogous to the U.S. White House) and nobody will bother you.

      Sad, but that's how we live here in Mexico :(

    15. Re:The wheels of justice turn slow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you give me that juris-my-dicktion crap, you can cram it up your ass.

    16. Re:The wheels of justice turn slow. by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      He was living in a MANSION in mexico. How hard did they even look for this guy.

      Yeah. And I'm surprised OJ didn't come across him during his mansion-to-mansion search for the real killers.

  6. Off to Federal Pound-Me-In-A$$ Prison by jdwest · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... where turnabout is foreplay.

    --

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet ...
  7. Re:And? by Hrvat · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Erm... Imagine you're working on a particular brand name. Then someone comes and hijacks your website. So whoever goes to (formerly) your website generates profit for the hijacker.

    --
    TANSTAAFL
  8. Maybe it's time.. by Tominva1045 · · Score: 1, Offtopic


    Maybe the time is right to invite Mexico to become U.S. States 51-54?

    If it was part of the U.S. the following benefits would be realized:

    - Easier extradition of criminals

    - Better environmental laws there would help get toxic cleanup started

    - Consistent employer laws to better protect employees

    - Great real estate opportunities!

    Donald Trum, call your office.

    --
    Cogito Ergo Sum
    1. Re:Maybe it's time.. by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      I was going to say something along the lines of Mexico being a drag on our Economy. But since we so neatly backed the enconomy up and shipped it oversea, what's the harm?

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    2. Re:Maybe it's time.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you remember? Nobody want to be the US these days. Times are a-changin'

      - Easier extradition of criminals
      He's a terrorist, he ain't got no rights

      - Better environmental laws there would help get toxic cleanup started
      Burn more gas, the rest of the world will figure out how to clean it up

      - Consistent employer laws to better protect employees
      Protection from unions, protection from a fare wage

      - Great real estate opportunities!
      Well, you got me there.

      Nope, I don't reckon they'd join if you asked.

    3. Re:Maybe it's time.. by Scaba · · Score: 1

      Wasn't Bender built in America's heartland - Mexico?

    4. Re:Maybe it's time.. by moracity · · Score: 5, Funny

      While that may sound like a pretty crazy idea, in reality, it would probably benefit both countries. American entrepenuers would immediately rush into Mexico, creating millions of jobs. No longer would Mexicans have a reason to migrate north, many illegally.

      Other benefits:

      1) Access to all Mexican oil/natural resources, eliminating dependence on imported oil/resources

      2) Illegal immigration from Mexico stopped

      3) No more terrorist entry into Mexico

      4) Increased tax base

      5) Increase military - absorb existing and recruiting more - we could finally become the imperialist nation everyone accuses us of being...starting with Canada, then Central America. Cuba? Gone.

      The beneifts seem limitless. I am sure there are some drawbacks, but I think they would be outweighed.

    5. Re:Maybe it's time.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, it's not before those problems were addressed....

      oh wait, you meant in mexico?

    6. Re:Maybe it's time.. by Guppy06 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Maybe the time is right to invite Mexico to become U.S. States 51-54?"

      First off, there's 31 states in Mexico, not counting the Distrito Federal. Why are you arbitrarily cutting them down to 4?

      Secondly, they hate us. A good deal of them are still screaming bloody murder about the last war we had with them 160 years ago and cheer what Pancho Villa did up here. We're mutually convenient neighbors but not necessarily friends.

      "Easier extradition of criminals"

      Perhaps, perhaps not. Besides, the only way you're going to stop people from fleeing south to avoid extradition is to extend the US down to Tierra del Fuego.

      "Better environmental laws there would help get toxic cleanup started"

      First off, guess which one of us signed Kyoto. Second, a lot of their problems with toxic waste are because we put it there.

      "Consistent employer laws to better protect employees"

      Ignoring details like whether they'd all be "right to work" states, what makes you think Mexican labor laws will be adjusted "up" instead of US labor laws being adjusted "down?"

      "Great real estate opportunities!"

      Yeah, that's what they said last time. Not much prime real estate in Arizona or New Mexico, though.

    7. Re:Maybe it's time.. by eprubio · · Score: 1
      Easier extradition of criminals
      Really? It seems to me that my goverment (yes, I'm mexican) is full of US-ass kissers.
      Better environmental laws there would help get toxic cleanup started
      Guess where that toxic material comes from... Oh, and those "better laws" do exist (want an example? google for Ley Monsanto).
      Consistent employer laws to better protect employees
      Isn't that bad for those helpless megacorps and their merciful sweatshops?
      Great real estate opportunities!
      Really? You should visit San Miguel de Allende...
    8. Re:Maybe it's time.. by CFTM · · Score: 1

      I like Canada being gone. I mean those god damn canukes don't even use all that land! We could cut all the trees down and raise lots of genetically engineered cattle that have anti-freeze in their blood to exist in the colder climate or hell maybe with climate change it'll be warmer up there so we can really start industrializing the great waste known as "forests". Think of all the possibilities...moreover G.W. would have a huge base of poor people to recruit for his crusades against foreign dictators. It might just be the manpower he needs to finally start that war with Iran that we all know he wants so bad...good times had by all!

    9. Re:Maybe it's time.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It would be pretty funny if the US annexed Canada. Sure, at first, there'd be a lot of bad blood, but afterwards, you'd basically have added 25 million people who (by American standards) all inhabit the extreme left wing, what with our belief in national health care and cheap post-secondary education.

      At best, that'd be 25 million new Democrats, and at worst, 25 million... well, whoever's most left-wing while still remaining capitalist and democratic.

    10. Re:Maybe it's time.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, I actually remember seeing a poll a while ago that said 60% of mexicans would favor annexation by the US.

    11. Re:Maybe it's time.. by Gyga · · Score: 1

      "Great real estate opportunities"

      Yeah, that's what they said last time. Not much prime real estate in Arizona or New Mexico, though.


      Have you been to Arizona? The prices are skyrocketing, and that is on small houses I would hate to try and buy a large house. People love the desert/south.

      --
      I don't preview or spellcheck.
    12. Re:Maybe it's time.. by FrancescBlandino · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Mexico, Central America? I don't think so. Last time such a thing happend was in the 1850 with William Walker and his Fillibusters who where sponsored by the Southern States and had the ultimate goal of enslave Central America under the Southern States rule. To make the story short: They failed establishing the Republic of Sonora (Mexico) and after that they went to invade Central America. In Nicaragua they managed to take over the goverment (due to the political inestability) but when the Costarican president Mora saw the manace because of the multiple skirmishes in the border and the constant threats, he organized an army (the Costarican army didn't even had more than a handful of cannons) and defended the country when war was declared. Incredibly the Costarican army managed to defeat the Fillibusters in Nicaragua (with heavy losses) and with the help of the other Centralamerican countries Walker was defeated and forced out Central America. Whem he returnde with another sponsored force he was captured by the British, handed over to the Hondureans and EXECUTED. That is what happens when you mess wiht Costa Rica and Central America.

    13. Re:Maybe it's time.. by mcsestretch · · Score: 0

      Yep. Inside his torso are the words, "Hecho en Mexico" Wasn't his full name Bender Bending Rodriguez?

    14. Re:Maybe it's time.. by loose_cannon_gamer · · Score: 1

      What do you mean, not much prime real estate in Arizona or New Mexico? I just bought 50 acres of beachfront Arizona property last week from this guy selling door to door. I don't know why it doesn't sell like hotcakes, I only paid a few hundred thousand cash from my retirement account.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, us are belong to all your base.
    15. Re:Maybe it's time.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying that conquest of the Americas will never happen because a poorly-planned and poorly-executed coup failed?

      stfu and go back to logic class, you stillbirth. It's rather clear that any serious imperialist effort in the Americas would be extremely easy to accomplish, so long as we are committed to it enough to perform atrocities in order to combat the inevitable guerillas.

    16. Re:Maybe it's time.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A good deal of [Mexicans] are still screaming bloody murder about the last war we had with them 160 years ago

      Heh. Did you see them after our soccer team beat theirs in the 2002 World Cup? It was as if losing to the Gringos was the final unendurable humiliation. Grown men, crying on TV, wailing about how they're just "rats" or some other bizarre idiom that didn't translate too well.

      Fucking priceless.

      The only thing sweeter than beating the Mexicans at soccer is beating one of the traditional South American powerhouses. Sadly, that doesn't happen much because, well, they're generally better than we are. But Columbia 2004 was sweet too.

    17. Re:Maybe it's time.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know why nobody's ever tried to invade Canada?

      Because everybody knows how the invasions of Russia worked out.

      Plus, we might just go burn your White House down again for your impudence.

    18. Re:Maybe it's time.. by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "You know why nobody's ever tried to invade Canada?"

      Because you have nothing worth having.

      "Because everybody knows how the invasions of Russia worked out."

      Why, are you gonna torch Ottawa just so we can't have it?

      Or are you referring to the cold weather? Neither France nor Germany had an Alaska.

      "Plus, we might just go burn your White House down again for your impudence."

      Those soldiers were carrying the Union Jack, not the Maple Leaf. In fact, I believe those particular soldiers were fresh from fighting Napoleon in Europe.

      Besides, we're talking about the classically inept District of Columbia. Baltimore showed how to repulse an invasion.

    19. Re:Maybe it's time.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhm... the average home price in Arizona is well over a quarter of a million dollars.

      Phoenix valley is one of the most booming housing markets in the nation.

    20. Re:Maybe it's time.. by Lew+Payne · · Score: 1

      I think I just detected the death of your last few million brain cells. Pardon me while I pick up your spilled electrons.

  9. Re:And? by ThogScully · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In the nineties, it wasn't about just any domain name. Keyword domain names were worth millions at least. Someone had the foresight to get sex.com (which you can't deny is and was an incredibly profitable keyword on the web) fast and lost that opportunity. He fought to keep the domain and pointed out the errors in NSI's policies and even when demonstrated to them he was the rightful owner, they did nothing to undo their mistake.

    The real perpetrator in this case is NSI for essentially violating their agreement with the original owner to keep his domain in his control, but you can't deny that the original owner wasn't a victim.
    -Neil

    --
    I've nothing to say here...
  10. Blame the Internet Authorities (Verisign) by cdn-programmer · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yes - I think it was Verisign. This is a DNS entry which could have been fixed in a few minutes. This is not like he absconded with the website and couldn't be reached. The website is an address in a nameserver! People should understand this. The issue is beauracatic bungling and Verisign was doing a lot of this back then.

    1. Re:Blame the Internet Authorities (Verisign) by cdn-programmer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      AH yes - Network solutions was bought by Verisign. It was really Network solutions who screwed up. They didn't even follow their own poliies on lame names back then. There was a lot of crap going on.

      How is this different than someone stealing your identity and going to the bank and withdrawing your money and the bank says what? You don't have any money anymore because we gave it to someone else? Bullshit. It is the Banks responsibility to ensure they are dealing with who they think they are dealing with and ditto for Network Solutions. As I said before, Network Solutions could have fixed the problem with a simple DNS change and that only takes a few minutes. For Network solutions to hide behind their own error and refuse to correct things until a Judge orders them to is just bullshit.

      IMHO Network solutions should be held liable because it was their error.

    2. Re:Blame the Internet Authorities (Verisign) by Otter · · Score: 3, Insightful
      How is this different than someone stealing your identity and going to the bank and withdrawing your money and the bank says what?

      I'm pretty sure that guy gets in trouble, too. They don't just pat him on the head and send the bank teller to prison.

    3. Re:Blame the Internet Authorities (Verisign) by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      Would have been nice.

      However; until it was proven that the change was indeed illegal (all they knew back then is that the somebody else said it wasn't to be transferred), they could not (and did not) do anything.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    4. Re:Blame the Internet Authorities (Verisign) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      IMHO Network solutions should be held liable because it was their error.

      They were held liable. Kremen sued, and won.

    5. Re:Blame the Internet Authorities (Verisign) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, NSI did pay a hefty sum. There's no excuse for the lack of speed at which it was handled, but as an aside, if someone validates themselves to a company with the "proper" (but fake) authentication, then what's that company to do?

      I can tell you first hand, though, that a lot of the authentication procedures at NSI have been revamped and made a lot more difficult to fake.

    6. Re:Blame the Internet Authorities (Verisign) by capilot · · Score: 1

      "Back then"? Network Solutions is infamous for this kind of screwup. Remember races.com?

      As one friend said, "Network Solutions couldn't secure a lava pool against snowmen"

    7. Re:Blame the Internet Authorities (Verisign) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as an aside, if someone validates themselves to a company with the "proper" (but fake) authentication, then what's that company to do?

      Obviously, they should allow the transaction. But when shown conclusive proof that the transaction was fraudulent, NSI refused to do anything. That's why Kremen won his lawsuit against NSI.

    8. Re:Blame the Internet Authorities (Verisign) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  11. Time for revenge... by nomayogr · · Score: 5, Funny
    It says in TFA(tm):
    "During the years of litigation, he had moved his millions overseas and then left the country himself, occasionally calling Kremen to taunt him."
    and
    "While Kremen was busy with other things, including the company that grew into online dating site Match.com, he did nothing with Sex.com"
    If I were Kremen, I'd have to go visit him at least once to tell him: "Yeah Cohen, there's a lot of prisoners on my Match.com site, you should really set up an account and try and form a long lasting relationship. Our 200 point match engine can provide you with a companion you'll really like to be sodomized by"
    1. Re:Time for revenge... by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      Our 200 point match engine

      Do they really need 200 points to match up for a prison mate? I was thinking one point is sufficient: "are you in the same cell?"

      I mean, for this kind of match up, it really doesn't matter what the "lady" is looking for in a relationship, does it?

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  12. Yes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds good to me!

  13. So is it just me... by hal2814 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...or is this a case of somebody crossing the border to get INTO Mexico?

    1. Re:So is it just me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It works like this:

      - have no money -> cross border into US
      - have lots of money -> cross border into Mexico

  14. Sure he was a victim. by hal9000(jr) · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just because he registered sex.com to take advantage of a profitable opportunity doesn't mean he can't be a victim. He didn't try to squat (in this case) on what might be a trademarked name just to squeeze money from a corporation. He registered a name with the intent to make money. Nothing wrong with that. That someone else took it and that NSI refused to admit thier mistake and make it right makes him a victim.

    1. Re:Sure he was a victim. by ThogScully · · Score: 1

      Please reread my post and you'll see that I did say the original owner was the victim.

      --
      I've nothing to say here...
  15. What's he going to do in prison? by Dekortage · · Score: 1

    It's not like he can't run a web site from behind bars. Every prison library has computers and Internet access nowadays. I'll be surprised if he is not still raking in dough from online ventures -- overseas if not domestically.

    --
    $nice = $webHosting + $domainNames + $sslCerts
    1. Re:What's he going to do in prison? by mysqlrocks · · Score: 1

      Every prison library has computers and Internet access nowadays.

      I don't know what parallel universe you're living in. I doubt any prison in the US has Internet access.

    2. Re:What's he going to do in prison? by schon · · Score: 2, Funny

      I doubt any prison in the US has Internet access.

      Of course you can get internet access in prison. You just have to be creative enough.

    3. Re:What's he going to do in prison? by Dekortage · · Score: 1

      Really? I've read news reports of inmates with Internet access... could be certain states allow it, or only low-security prisons (e.g. so-called "Club Feds"). My impression was that it was allowed for "research" and "educational" purposes, though some had found ways of accomplishing other tasks with it. I'll see if I can dig up links to such articles.

      --
      $nice = $webHosting + $domainNames + $sslCerts
  16. He was WHAT? by Guppy06 · · Score: 2, Funny

    "arrested on an immigration violation by Mexican authorities and turned over to agents of the U.S. Border Patrol,"

    OK, so let me get this straight: he was deport from Mexico to the United States?

    I think I need to go lie down now...

    1. Re:He was WHAT? by gclef · · Score: 1

      Deported? More like extradited. There's a difference.

    2. Re:He was WHAT? by Guppy06 · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, extradition doesn't involve "immigration charges," unless those immigration charges were from entering the United States, no Mexico.

  17. BAD MOD by LordKazan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    If i get to meta-moderate that post i'm meta-moderating the moderator: retard

    --
    If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
  18. what was it? by argStyopa · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is /.

    Anything having to do with a breakdown or interruption at sex.com:

    "...I felt a great disturbance ... as if millions of voices cried out in terror and were suddenly relieved...."

    --
    -Styopa
  19. 5 years??? by Antifuse · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What astounds me is that it took until 2000 for him to get the domain back. 5 years!!! Sweet mother of crap. And another 5 years for them to find the damn guy. I wonder if that $65 million judgement is even close to the amount of money that Cohen raked in via sex.com. Also - Tijuana? Are you kidding me? You're fleeing from the law, and you go to Tijuana? That's like being wanted for murder in Detroit, and fleeing to Windsor. For all his con-man smarts, he clearly ain't all THAT smart.

    1. Re:5 years??? by Goo.cc · · Score: 1

      The article doesn't say, but how much time passed before Kremen discovered the domain had been hijacked?

  20. Im thinking... by Javi0084 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    that he stopped paying bribes to the Federales and thats why he got busted.

  21. Amen to that. by Carl+T · · Score: 1

    But the grandparent wasn't too bright either, really. Hoping the finer^Wblunter points of sarcasm would be appreciated on slashdot. Sheesh.

    --

    This signature is not in the public domain.
    1. Re:Amen to that. by hey! · · Score: 1

      It's cool. Everything's cool. I've been breathing into a paper bag and I've almost... got it under.. control.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  22. Bittorrent by theseeria · · Score: 0

    Bra... Stephen Cohen finally got arrested :)

  23. Re:And? by Anita+Coney · · Score: 0, Troll

    "Troll" "Flamebait" Doesn't ANYONE understand satire anymore?!

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  24. INS can't be bothered to pick up arrested illegals by SuperBanana · · Score: 3, Interesting
    ...or is this a case of somebody crossing the border to get INTO Mexico?

    Meanwhile, a New Hampshire Sherriff is charging illegal immigrants with trespassing. Why? Every time his department finds one (and he finds himself running into a LOT of them), he finds they're not here legally and calls the INS- the INS says "sorry, we don't have time to pick them up." So they're part of a revolving door.

    That revolving door runs off tax dollars. Guess what? Illegal immigrants don't pay a dime in taxes (not even sales in NH) and he's having to spend an increasing amount of time dealing with them. So he and the DA decided to throw them in jail and charge them $50 a pop, and wouldn't you know- a bunch of "immigrant rights" activists threw a hissy fit.

  25. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  26. And the #1 thing he will be doing in prison... by TheHorse13 · · Score: 1

    ...bringing back everyones favorite website, jailbabes.com

  27. This is real? by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

    There really was once a website called "Sex.com" that wasn't pornography? Huh, there's a first time for everything, I suppose.

    1. Re:This is real? by Jozer99 · · Score: 1

      No, it just wasn't a website. The guy who legally owned it just bought the name and didn't use it, then this dude stole it, made millions, which made the other dude angry. Now the legal owner has the site back and is making millions, and everything is all better.

  28. Re:INS can't be bothered to pick up arrested illeg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Your lack of faith in "diversity" is disturbing, citizen-unit. Stop questioning and return to your simple life of mass media induced stupor!

  29. Sarcasm and trolling are two different things by donscarletti · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you cannot disinguish them, maybe you should decline your mod points. Why someone would bother modding a post down when there are many other good posts to mod up defies logic at the best of time, but the parent was deliberately funny damnit.

    --
    When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
  30. In the Netherlands ... by cablepokerface · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... wussies that we are, this guy would just get some prison time (since internet fraud isn't regarded a class A felony) and a fine (not even coming close to what he earned).

    I really hope they take away all his money and he gets 30 years. It's about time these criminals get what they deserve.

  31. Re:I registered google.com by hugesmile · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Back in the 90s I registered google.com

    Here is what google.com looked like in December of 1998. (God Bless the way back machine.) Are you claiming that you owned google.com prior to that?

    Please answer me! Can you read this? Or are your eyes covered by your colon, because your head is up your a$$...

  32. WTF?!!?! by multipartmixed · · Score: 4, Funny
    Let me get this straight:
    Immigration officials picked up an illegal American living in Mexico

    Have I fallen into some kind of alternate universe?

    If so, is it the one where Spock has a goatee, or do I get treated to Nana Visitor in tight leather pants?

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    1. Re:WTF?!!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Due to a certain ambiguity in the way you posed that question, I could make a joke about the Major being your beard, but I'll just stop right there.

      Now if we're talking fantasies, I'd rather end up in a galaxy far far away with Leia as my slave girl. Gold bikini. Yow.

    2. Re:WTF?!!?! by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      I am very proud of you for not using the "In Soviet Russia..." joke. Because you were a good boy, I shall make your reality Nana in tight leather pants.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    3. Re:WTF?!!?! by Count+of+Montecristo · · Score: 1
      Believe it or not, Mexico DOES have an immigration authority, and you do need permission if you are a foreigner and plan to work in mexico.

      Tourism is another matter. You can enter without a visa for 3 months. But stay here longer and the INI will be on your case, be sure. The US has no exclusivity on being bitches about aliens and economic activities.

      Here is the Instituto Nacional de Migracion (the INS counterpart in Mexico) relevant page in english.

      --
      *shower*
  33. Na, someone else just prepaid . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mexico is still utterly corrupt. Enough prepay + prior relationships means the I'll give you more money pleading = not going to work.

  34. MOD PARENT UP by rjshields · · Score: 1

    I salute you sir.

    --
    In this world nothing is certain but death, taxes and flawed car analogies.
  35. Riiight.. by MaXiMiUS · · Score: 0

    So.. any idea why, despite the fact they 'caught' him, that sex.com still has pr0n?

    --
    It's never just a game when you're winning. - George Carlin
    1. Re:Riiight.. by Trillan · · Score: 1

      Isn't it obvious? It has different porn now.

  36. Count your negations, please by Gnavpot · · Score: 1

    Please reread my post and you'll see that I did say the original owner was the victim.

    No, actually you said the opposite. Please count your negations. This is what you wrote:

    you can't deny that the original owner wasn't a victim.

    1. Re:Count your negations, please by ThogScully · · Score: 1

      My mistake indeed... I'm pretty sure my meaning was clear regardless.
      -N

      --
      I've nothing to say here...
    2. Re:Count your negations, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can't deny that the original owner wasn't a victim.

      Let's see... I'm not the grandparent, but I think he got it right, even if he dosen't think so after you called him on it... So let's analyze.

      Here's what he said, which admidtedly wasn't the best of language:
      You can't(1) deny that the original owner wasn't(2) a victim.

      I see two negatives (-10*-10)=100.

      If he had said:
      You can deny that the original owner wasn't(1) a victim.
      You can't(1) deny that the original owner was a victim.
      You can deny that the original owner was a victim. ...Then you'd be absolutely right, because in those phrases there is one negative each (discounting the one with all positives), and they all mean the exact same thing. Deny is NOT a negative in his usage, if you think that's where you're coming from.

      Remember, kids...
      (negative)(positive)=negative
      (positive)(positive)=positive
      (negative)(negative)=positive

    3. Re:Count your negations, please by DrJimbo · · Score: 1
      I gotta disagree. The deny implies a negation. To wit:

      The OO was a victim (=> victim)
      You can deny OO was victim (=> not victim)
      You can't deny OO was victim (=> victim)
      You can't deny OO wasn't victim (=> not victim)

      --
      We don't see the world as it is, we see it as we are.
      -- Anais Nin
  37. Re:INS can't be bothered to pick up arrested illeg by Peyna · · Score: 1

    Butler County Ohio started sending bills to the INS for housing illegal immigrants in the County Jail (usually picked up for other crimes)

    That said, don't expect any action on this anytime soon. Bush can't come down against illegals because a lot of his heavy supporters rely on illegal workers to reap profits off of low wages, but he can't come down in favor of letting them in either, because a good chunk of the rest of his supporters are opposed to having illegals in the country at all and want stricter immigration laws.

    It's an interesting situation.

    --
    What?
  38. Re:INS can't be bothered to pick up arrested illeg by timeOday · · Score: 1

    I don't see how that would pan out at $50 / per. You mention throwing them in jail, and it takes hours to arrest and process somebody as I understand it.

  39. Re:Mexico uses Immigration Laws?? WTF? by cbreaker · · Score: 1

    So, it's not the Bush administration that wants to give welfare and drivers licenses to illegal immigrants? Last I checked, these guys are conservative republicans.

    WTF is right. But don't start barking "Liberal scum!!!111" just because you want someone else to blame.

    --
    - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
  40. Cohen = jew. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All he had to do was go to Israel to avoid punishment for his crimes since they don't extradict and Mexico has been known to throw people back from time to time.

  41. Major slimeball story by Saeger · · Score: 5, Interesting
    In the mid 90s I worked as a sysadmin/programmer at one of the first web pr0n companies. These were the early pioneering days, so we had to develop our own creditcard processing back-end (had banks of modems dialing out; and a daemon named "getmoney" that did the batch job), as well as our own "hot" live streaming video.

    The "state of the art" in streaming video that we had in 1995-96 was basically a tiny postagestamp-sized jpeg multipart/x-mixed-replace slideshow -- which the dominant netscape browser supported perfectly, but IE no longer does -- pushed out by our "exclusive" sun sparc video server boxes.

    This was hot tech and this guy Steve Cohen approached us about getting our stuff setup in Mexico for sex.com. I'm not exactly sure about all the details, but we ended up with some sort of deal where we would provide a dozen video servers + installation & support in exchange for rights to the video feeds he was going to operate with the talent in Mexico. We also paid a bundle to setup a microwave link across the US/Mexico border.

    So then he turns slimy: Mr. Cohen failed to provide the promised feeds (guess he wanted to be exclusive). And he never payed for our expensive equipment either. My boss flew down there to talk things out and apparently back then Mr. Cohen was cozy with the federalis and had him thrown in jail for a few days before he could fly back out. I then get a call from El Slimeball wherein he tries to BRIBE me into a) not remotely disabling the servers since I was the admin, and b) coming to work for him in sunny Mexico (enticing me with pathetic stories of how the blowjobs flow freely from his slutty girls.)

    I guess he didn't know that his techs had already locked me out, or maybe he thought I had some backdoors, but I couldn't stop him remotely; all I remember finding was some useless hostbased rlogin accounts. I also wasn't about move to mexico, and I was (*gasp*) loyal, so I declined the hefty bribe (by not giving my account info for the wire transfer).

    Anyway - that's my little anecdote of the famous Steve Cohen asshole. Hope there'll be a live jailcam video feed. :)

    --
    Power to the Peaceful
    1. Re:Major slimeball story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Had me going until the part about passing on the free blowjobs. What selfrespecting nerd could possibly resist the only sex he'll ever get?

    2. Re:Major slimeball story by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      So you're out of that industry now, right?

    3. Re:Major slimeball story by Saeger · · Score: 1

      Yeah, mostly. It's saturated. Besides... who could top this?

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    4. Re:Major slimeball story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I remember Cohen from the old Ynot Network days... never liked him much, as he always had that slimeball vibe. Later on he started to threaten anyone with a domain that had the word "sex" in it (even foreign language), claimiming to own all rights to it. Then using his stomping powers to spread FUD.

  42. Any relation to Bram? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bram Cohen's blackhat evil twin recently captured in US sting.

    He was last seen screaming "Releasing it for free? Are you a retard? You don't even have any banner ads!"

  43. Re:Captured in Mexico by wolenczak · · Score: 1

    FYI: Having sex in Mexico is not an offense, seems to be where you live it is.

  44. Tiajuana mansion? by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 1, Funny

    What is that, like a double-wide?

    --
    Just junk food for thought...
  45. is it just ME? by djdavetrouble · · Score: 1

    or have you missed every crime / car chase movie ever made? If you are running from the law, you run to MEXICO.
    Haven't you even seen the greatest movie of all time, Convoy ? The genius part is that they use the CB as a narrative device, but I digress, Long story short guy is being chased by smoky (thats what us CBers call Johnny Law, aka CHiPs, aka Oinkey the pig, the fuzz, the cops dammit) and had to make it across the border of.... you guessed it.... Mexico.

    There is even a song about this subject, the magnificent "Ride Like the Wind" by one of the greatest musicians of the century (catch him now at the Stardust Lounge, off the strip, shows at 8 and 11), the inimitable Kristopher Kross !
    And I've got such a long way to go,
    to make it to the border of mexicol.....

    yeah, you know the one..

    --
    music lover since 1969
  46. Hmmmm.... by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

    You didn't work for Seth at IEG, did you?

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    1. Re:Hmmmm.... by Saeger · · Score: 1
      Nope. Met the (gay) dude though. I went along as the tech on salestrips from the eastcoast to peddle our videostuff on the westcoast, where most of the adultbiz is.

      Not for "fantasyman" at cybererotica.com either. :) suffice it to say that we folded before the dotcom bubble had even inflated very much.

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    2. Re:Hmmmm.... by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

      WOrked for him for a few years before getting a real job. He's running from the Feds in Thailand now.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  47. Sittin' here watchin the wheels go round and round by hey! · · Score: 1

    I've been watching the mods go up and down on my post; I'm amazed that so many moderators want to weigh in on it.

    It isn't easy to draw a clear line between sarcasm and trolling. I think though the thing about trolling is that it doesn't really make a point; it's just attention seeking. I'll leave it open to people to judge whether I really believed in the point I was making.

    I don't make a practice of mocking all conservatives or conservative views, but bear in mind that both ends of the political spectrum have their lunatic fringe. My right wing friends would be wise to remember this. Here we had evidence that there are people so misguided as to think Mr. Cohen, a criminal sleazeball, is somehow being treated shabbily because he's rich. Or somehow if we can't catch a 100% of poor illegal immigrants we should give a pass to fugitives whose mailing address we have, provided the address turns out to be mansion. I don't paint the entire right with this viewpoint, but you guys on the right'll have to bear you own cross. Maybe I'm an old liberal dog with bad teeth who can't resist snapping at a little red meat, but I don't feel the obligation to let this kind of foolishness pass by without comment.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  48. Re:INS can't be bothered to pick up arrested illeg by bluGill · · Score: 1

    Short term it probably does cost more. However word gets out, I wouldn't be surprised if less illegals showed up in that town in a few years because they know they will be fined.

    I'm not sure if this is a good plan, but I could see how it could work.

  49. Good ol' Days... by RexRhino · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I needed to change servers for a company I was working for back in 96 or 97... of course I didn't have any of the domain registration information, because the guy who had all the info got fired. So what was the high-security way to get access to change my domain registration information? I had to fax a request on company letterhead! Yes, that is right, anyone could steal anyone elses domain name, simply by making a faxed request on company letterhead! Of course, I was not stealing the domain, I really was authorized by my employer to make the changes. But it was SIMPLE beyond comprehension.

    Yes, I know those were the 90s wild west days of the Internet, but come on? Company letterhead as a security device? I am shocked that domain highjacking wasn't far more of a problem than it was!

    1. Re:Good ol' Days... by LaPoderosa · · Score: 1

      It was even worse than this. Around 97-98 there was a huge loophole in the Internic registration process whereby you could transfer the DNS servers without being the owner, via their "I've changed email" online forms for the technical contact. The only caveat was that the owner got an email telling them their account details had been changed. If the owner missed it (and usually they did), two days later the DNS swapped over. At the time I was in high school, and being the little brat I was I transferred DNS on some large sites to certain other obscene sites because it was funneh. However, seems I could be living in a Tijuana mansion right now if I'd been a bit smarter. What I'm most amazed about is nobody else seemed to catch on to this exploit, as it had the capacity to cripple the Internet in the wrong hands.

  50. Re:fsrt ps0t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that was the gayest shit i have ever seen

  51. Mr. Coen was over heard asking one of the by Hohlraum · · Score: 1

    arresting officers if conjugal visits were allowed in prison. The office replied, "Conjugal visits? Not that I know of. Now, a minimum security prison is no picnic. ... You see, the trick is, kick someone's ass the first day or become someone's bitch. Then everything will be all right. ..."

  52. Re:INS can't be bothered to pick up arrested illeg by griffjon · · Score: 1

    Illegal immigrants don't pay a dime in taxes (not even sales in NH) and he's having to spend an increasing amount of time dealing with them. So he and the DA decided to throw them in jail and charge them $50 a pop

    Uh, how do they not pay sales tax? Do they whip out their illegal-immigrant card at the supermarket and say "I'm not a citizen, please remove the sales tax from this purchase" ? Get a clue.

    Meanwhile, the INS, police, court-appointed lawyers and the various bureaucrats involved COST tax dollars. Not to mention the cost of jailing them, food, overhead and whatnot. Hardly balanced out by a $50 fine.

    Go read _Nickled and Dimed_; your cheap walmarty goods and meals at restaurants are being subsidized by the low cost of labor (under minimum wage, mind you) that can be extracted from "illegals."

    --
    Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
  53. Re:INS can't be bothered to pick up arrested illeg by Laven · · Score: 1

    New Hampshire has no sales tax.

  54. Re:Captured in Mexico by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    What sound did that make as it whizzed by overhead?

    By saying Cohen was caught having sex, the poster meant that Cohen was caught in possesion (that's what "having" means in this case) of sex (ie. the sex.com domain).

    Whilst not factually correct, it is mildly funny.

  55. Re:INS can't be bothered to pick up arrested illeg by RpiMatty · · Score: 1

    No sales tax in NH is simple. No one pays it.
    Live Free Or Die, thats how they do it up there.
    Get a clue

  56. Re:INS can't be bothered to pick up arrested illeg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh, how do they not pay sales tax? Do they whip out their illegal-immigrant card at the supermarket and say "I'm not a citizen, please remove the sales tax from this purchase" ? Get a clue.

    Maybe you should take a trip to the clue store. NH doesn't have sales tax.

    Meanwhile, the INS, police, court-appointed lawyers and the various bureaucrats involved COST tax dollars. Not to mention the cost of jailing them, food, overhead and whatnot. Hardly balanced out by a $50 fine.

    What do you suggest, charge them $1,000? Most of them aren't going to have $1,000. $50 is something, better than letting them stay for "free" I suppose.

  57. Re:US immigration failures by mumblestheclown · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    take your comment, print it out, and store it in a safe place. 20 years later, open it up and read it and realize what kind of knee-jerk dumbass you were when you were young. if that doesn't happen, shoot yourself.

  58. Re:INS can't be bothered to pick up arrested illeg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I think you meant to say, New Hampshire has no sales tax... Dumbass.

    I agree, illegals are being exploited. For their own good we should arrest them and send them back where they came from. Everyone wins. US workers, exploited illegals. Except Wal-Mart and the slaves used for labor in China to ensure you can buy a cheap barbeque. Oh, and you lose, because you still have to pay for health-care-less Wal-Mart workers when they go to the Emergency Room when they have the flu.

  59. Mexico Jobs Program by Somegeek · · Score: 1
    Mexico is actively creating jobs specifically to keep people from leaving the country.

    Here is a link to an article that discusses the jobs program and some of the problems that towns in Mexico are having due to loosing workers to the US.

    http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2 005/10/27/MNGQFFEGB41.DTL

    Why do you think the truth is sinister? Do you have any facts to show that the Mexican government encourages illegal immigration into the US?

    To me it would seem like they would be loosing the people that are willing and able to go out and work, the workers that you would most want to keep to help build your economy.

    --
    And as you tread the halls of sanity, You feel so glad to be, Unable to go beyond. I have a message, From another time..
    1. Re:Mexico Jobs Program by ASCIIMan · · Score: 1

      I do not dispute that Mexican some towns and cities or even regions may individually be having economic problems when a large percentage of their population decides to pull up roots and move (usually) to the US where they can earn higher wages. However, this is not necessarily the case for Mexico as a whole—comparing the figure given for total remittances sent back to Mexico by Mexican immigrants to the US in 2004 here, and the figure for Mexico's estimated GDP in 2004 given here, you can see that more than 1% of Mexico's GDP comes directly from remittances sent from Mexican immigrants living in the US. This is not an insignificant figure, and I would be surprised if the Mexican (national) government did not at least ignore illegal immigration to the US, if not encourage it (though discreetly, so they don't anger their greatest economic partner), because of this. Evidence of this last statement includes the brochure I linked to in my previous post.

    2. Re:Mexico Jobs Program by Somegeek · · Score: 1
      When I originally started answering the issues that people brought up in this thread, I wasn't really aware of how significant the remittance issue was in Mexico. I now understand it somewhat better and agree that it is a matter of some importance to the Mexican economy, with all that that entails. In fact I even ran across an article that indicated that the Mexican government has used remittances to fund projects and has had programs where they would contribute funding to match the amount of remittances, thus trying to encourage and increase them. So there appears to be at least a candid acceptance of the current state of affairs.

      That said though, how much better would it be for Mexico if the jobs themselves were in Mexico, and all of the wages were contributed into their economy, not just a portion sent back from some other country? While they might be accepting remittances as a silver lining in the dark cloud of their emigration/economic issues, they would truly rather have their workers at home, working in Mexico, contributing to their own economy, and they are actively working towards that end.

      As far as I understand it, that was one of the main reasons for Mexico to join NAFTA; the US would transfer the jobs and some industries down there, their workers would stay there, it would fix their economy/emigration issues and our illegal immigration issues. Unfortunately for the North Americans, the Chinese underbid the Mexicans and we (Wallmart :) shipped all the jobs and manufacturing work to China instead. Oops.

      As far as the pamphlet, I still completely believe that it is produced just as a safety advisory to try and help those who are probably going to cross anyway. Both to protect them from the physical dangers that the actual crossing can entail, as well as to help them avoid the brutality issues that they occasionally meet with at the hands of our enforcement agencies. I also realize that it is unfortunately not clear and that someone who wants to see it the other way probably will.

      --
      And as you tread the halls of sanity, You feel so glad to be, Unable to go beyond. I have a message, From another time..
  60. Re:INS can't be bothered to pick up arrested illeg by kotj.mf · · Score: 1
    That revolving door runs off tax dollars. Guess what? Illegal immigrants don't pay a dime in taxes (not even sales in NH) and he's having to spend an increasing amount of time dealing with them.

    You're wrong.

    Among other things, illegals contribute about $7 billion/year to Social Security that they'll never collect.

    Cite.

    --
    hang brain.
  61. Re:And? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Drive a piece of shit dumbass. Get over your 'love' for some random bitch that loves you for your car. And I doubt seriously you could build a house unless you're talking about pestering the fucking slaves about ambience and atmosphere.

  62. No, Mexico doesn't put up with illegal immigration by b00m3rang · · Score: 0, Troll

    Yet those fuckfaces have people in their government whose job it is to encourage and assist their poorest citizens in crossing OUR border illegally.

    But it's RACIST and CRUEL to consider deporting their lawbreaking asses back to their shithole country. I love double standards.

  63. Next he'll be starring in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Mexican version of Border Bangers... Not hetero... Quite apropos...

  64. There was a fairly good documentary on this... by slappyjack · · Score: 1

    ...in England.

    Of Course. It was on Channel 4, I was it maybe 4 months ago. Of course, they'd have to redo it to show it in the States, becuase - being made for English television - the producers tossed in titties pretty much everywhere they could (English TV is really awful, but is also TOTALLY FLIPPIN' SWEET.)

    BUT, They covered the whole story in all its grand silliness and buffoonery from the start. "The Letter" that was sent to transfer the domain name was so horribly done, and with about 30 seconds of fact-checking pretty much anyone could have seen that something was just not right with it.

    Anyhow, If anyone knows of a torrent of this thing out there, I'm sure people would find it highly entertaining.

  65. It's not everyday that you find out... by smc13 · · Score: 1

    ...that you've been arrested.

    It's strange though, I am sitting here at work in Baltimore, not in Tijuana.

    Stephen Michael Cohen

    1. Re:It's not everyday that you find out... by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      Well, you can think of Baltimore as Pennsylvania's Tijuana, what with liquor laws being what they are in Pennsylvania.

      I've heard stories from people as far away as New York coming down to Maryland to load up on liquor a few decades ago.

  66. NH doesn't have a sales tax, THAT'S WHY by SuperBanana · · Score: 2, Informative
    Uh, how do they not pay sales tax? Do they whip out their illegal-immigrant card at the supermarket and say "I'm not a citizen, please remove the sales tax from this purchase" ? Get a clue.

    New Hampshire has no salestax, Mr. Knowit A. Dipshit.

    My point is that they're doing absolutely nothing to contribute to the NH public; they pay no property, wage, or sales tax...pretty much the only way the government gets any money from you. They're not even spending the money here, they wire it home to Mexico or whereever.

    1. Re:NH doesn't have a sales tax, THAT'S WHY by griffjon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ah, You see I neither know nor really care about the NH tax structure.

      My point is that they're doing absolutely nothing to contribute to the NH public; they pay no property, wage, or sales tax...pretty much the only way the government gets any money from you.

      My point is that you're ignoring the reality here. They contribute low/under minimum wage jobs, from restaurant staff to janitorial services, (traditionally), to keep your costs down. If restaurants had to pay minimum wage, or heaven forbid a livable wage, the cost of your meal would triple. Low costs for menial labor let all kinds of businesses save money, and if they were paying higher, that cost would be passed on to you, Mr. Consumer.

      They're not even spending the money here, they wire it home to Mexico or whereever.

      Well then the sales tax thing doesn't even matter according to your argument, huh?

      I guarantee that they're spending money on food, clothing and shelter here, and sending all they can to support their families abroad -- and you'd do the same for your family in the same situation. I hope, at least.

      --
      Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
    2. Re:NH doesn't have a sales tax, THAT'S WHY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They contribute low/under minimum wage jobs, from restaurant staff to janitorial services, (traditionally), to keep your costs down. If restaurants had to pay minimum wage, or heaven forbid a livable wage, the cost of your meal would triple.

      So why, exactly, should those industries benefit from illegally subsidized wages and not others? If restaurants can violate labor laws and hire illegals, why can't my business hire children illegally? "If it wasn't for all those children, your cost to buy that sweater would be ten times greater! They're contributing to the economy!"

      And even if you're right that certain things would be much more expensive (and I don't believe the difference would be that much, BTW), that cost savings is more than offset by taxation required to pay for public benefits the illegals receive. Even if I don't consume a product or service subsidized illegally, I still have to pay to maintain the roads they drive on, the welfare they receive, the "free" medical care they get at local hospitals, federally assisted mortgages, the list goes on and on...

    3. Re:NH doesn't have a sales tax, THAT'S WHY by cas2000 · · Score: 1

      > My point is that they're doing absolutely nothing to contribute to the NH public;
      > they pay no property, wage, or sales tax...pretty much the only way the government
      > gets any money from you.


      it's truly amazing how loudmouth bigots and rednecks can forget their moral loathing for taxation when there's an opportunity for racist slagging-off of foreigners, isn't it?

      > They're not even spending the money here, they wire it home to Mexico or whereever.

      it's their money, why shouldn't they be able to do whatever they want with it? or is that a priviledge reserved for those of white anglo/european descent?

  67. Look the other way and... what? Cough? by DulcetTone · · Score: 1

    Good to see people held accountable.

    --
    tone
  68. Re:INS can't be bothered to pick up arrested illeg by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
    Uh, how do they not pay sales tax? Do they whip out their illegal-immigrant card at the supermarket and say "I'm not a citizen, please remove the sales tax from this purchase" ? Get a clue.

    I'm going to go out on a limb here and make the over/under 17.5 on the number of distinct replies explaining the folly of your post.

  69. Re:INS can't be bothered to pick up arrested illeg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And you go look up the healthcare costs for illegals. Three California hospitals bankrupt due to non-payment from illegals.

    They cost more than the $7 billion in SS payments.

  70. Re:INS can't be bothered to pick up arrested illeg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Oh, and you lose, because you still have to pay for health-care-less Wal-Mart workers when they go to the Emergency Room when they have the flu.

    These people's human dignity will add pennies to my taxes!

  71. the f@#k by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    investigate this f@#k to see if he's been up to some other f@#ked up stuff while in the land of the lawless.

  72. He asked for it... by InvisibleSoul · · Score: 1

    The sex.com trade is a dangerous business...

  73. Re:I registered google.com by Rod+Beauvex · · Score: 0

    You do realize the web has been around since 92 or so, right?

  74. Re:INS can't be bothered to pick up arrested illeg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So how about we legalize them then?? That way, they WILL be paying taxes, they WILL be held accountable for breaking the law, and they WONT be illegal aliens.

    Oh we cant do that, then we wont be able to get them to mow our lawns or wash our dishes for $5 an hour.

  75. Total bullshit by b00m3rang · · Score: 1

    I guess you haven't heard about the pamphlets the Mexican government hands out suggesting the best places to cross, what to bring, and how to evade US Border Patrol.

    1. Re:Total bullshit by Somegeek · · Score: 1
      Or maybe I have. Perhaps three other times in this very thread.

      And maybe I have actually read the pamphlet, and understood what its actual purpose is, instead of spouting off half truths that I can't be bothered to verify or to try and reason out.

      Maybe I pointed out a link to an English version of that same pamphlet that is being distributed by a committee set up by the US Government, instead of slinging racist slurs at Mexicans in my posts.

      But then that's just me. I try to research and understand topics that I talk about and things that are important to me, but I also understand that there are vulgar simpleminded people out there who would rather have their ideas fed to them by hate mongers.

      Are you willing to take the red pill and accept that you may have been wrong and try to look at this in a new way? Or are you going to take the blue pill and continue along in your angry little preconceived world?

      --
      And as you tread the halls of sanity, You feel so glad to be, Unable to go beyond. I have a message, From another time..
  76. Cowboy movies also had that plot by billstewart · · Score: 1
    Car chase movies using that plot were just rehashing the older versions used in cowboy movies - the chase scenes just go faster.

    Me and my uncle - we grabbed the gold, and we high-tailed it down to Mexico."

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  77. Re:INS can't be bothered to pick up arrested illeg by welshsocialist · · Score: 1

    How can the INS have time to pick up illegals when they don't exist anymore? The law enforcememnt part of immigration is now handled by Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the administative part of immigration is now handeled by Citizenship and Immigration Services.

    --
    Support the Chagossians
  78. Re:INS can't be bothered to pick up arrested illeg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >a bunch of "immigrant rights" activists threw a hissy fit.

    This may seem nitpicky, but the semantics suggest bias:

    People who throw hissy fits over illegal immigrants being prosecuted, are NOT advocates for immigrants... they're advocates for ILLEGAL immigrants.

    Advocacy for legal immigration can only be linked or confused with illegal immigration, through ignorance or a "fair and balanced" smear tactic. Not every proponent of legal immigration, also supports breaking the law or a decided LACK of law enforcement.*

    The way you phrased it, I was reminded of a FoxNews.com (and Boston Herald) story from ~4 years ago. They're building windmills off the shore of Cape Cod. Some property owners filed suit to stop it... NIMBIES... and Fox titled the story "Environmentalists against renewable energy". Never mind that these 'environmentalists' are ANYTHING BUT, driving SUVs and living on drained wetlands. Anyone can be labeled.

    * Not unless you are Walmart, or the GOP (which has overcome its race bias in the face of overwhelming contributions from Walmart and other large corporations wholly addicted to cheap throwaway labor).

  79. What about the Mexican government... by b00m3rang · · Score: 1

    stationing officers on their side of the border, redirecting people around the Minuteman project volunteers. They weren't telling people not to cross, they were telling them (essentially) how to evade our law enforcement and our Neighborhood Watch. Or demanding that illegal emigrants be given Driver Licenses or preferably full legal status? Sounds like they're trying really hard to keep people from crossing.

    You're right though, I should have read more of the thread before posting. My bad on that one.

  80. blowjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    blowjobs flow freely from his slutty girls


    buenos dias! como estas, en mexico?

  81. Re:No, Mexico doesn't put up with illegal immigrat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Note to moderators:

    This guy's sig might be a troll, but his post wasn't.

  82. Re:INS can't be bothered to pick up arrested illeg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have a funny idea about human dignity if you think coddling hustlers produces it, regardless of the cost.

  83. Re:INS can't be bothered to pick up arrested illeg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Presumably these illegal imagrants are eating food bought at stores and paying sales tax. As just one example that they are paying many many dimes of taxes.

  84. Re:Mexico uses Immigration Laws?? WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You've obviously missed the point ... all bad things in the world are caused by "liberals" ... if there were no "liberals", there would be no evil in the world - it would be as God intended it to be ...

    BTW, the "liberals" screwed Harriet Meiers as well ... they screamed and squealed, and got their elitist media allies to do their dirty work for them. Damn liberals like William Kristol, George Will, etc. Damn them all for hating Americans and our way of life ... liberals just love to hate all that is good in the world.

  85. The blackguard! by CitizenJohnJohn · · Score: 1

    "Cohen forged a letter to Internet authorities to gain control of the address, which he transformed into a highly profitable site for pornography ads."

    Thus depriving the original owners of the ability to turn sex.com into... a highly profitable site for pornography ads.

    Really, aside from the technical aspects of Network Solutions screw-up here, who gives a rat's who owns this domain? it's going to be a sleaze-fest whoever has it.

    1. Re:The blackguard! by Lew+Payne · · Score: 1

      "Really, aside from the technical aspects of Network Solutions screw-up here, who gives a rat's who owns this domain? it's going to be a sleaze-fest whoever has it."

      While we're at it, let's also not allow blacks, Jews and Muslims equal protection under the law.
      Your comment, to which I respond facetiously, only goes to show how intellectually bankrupt you really are.

  86. Encounter With Cohen by Lew+Payne · · Score: 1

    Funny you should mention that... I was going to post a lengthy article about that very same thing, then decided "what good will factual information do... this is slashdot, after all."

    So, in short... After a run-about with Cohen in federal court in the late 1980's (where my wife represented the defendant that Cohen filed against), he appeared again in the late 1990's with a letter from his attorney, asking that we turn over one of our domain names (sexbytes.com) because it violated his trademark on the word "sex". All that is explained here, for the most part with other bits being available here.

    Anyway, Cohen went away after I wrote him a nice letter reminding him of our 1980's encounter and let him know I was adding a few "very interesting" questions to the deposition Gary Kremem was going to be taking of him. He went away like a puppy dog with his tail tucked between his legs... and I lived happily ever after, seducing woman after woman, as explained here.

  87. Re:I registered google.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Your point is?

    A guy claims to have registered google.com, and you believe him without proof? Yeah, I discovered cold fusion, and also sent a rocket to mars.

  88. Re:I registered google.com by Rod+Beauvex · · Score: 0

    I don't recall saying I believe him. I was merely pointing out it was possible.

  89. Re:INS can't be bothered to pick up arrested illeg by sketchkid · · Score: 1

    Illegal immigrants pay payroll taxes... that they will never benefit from. The input/non-output feature of this more than makes up for a lack of income taxes from them - which they would most likely not pay under current pay levels that illegal immigrants receive.

    --


    ------
    [insert funny .sig here]
  90. Re:More documents from the EFF and others on the c by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good cases