Uuum, who said that women would not get lap dances by men? Have you ever seen women, when a hot lap dancer is around?? They are even worse than men! And I really like them for it! At least one thing where they act like natural humans.
And about the technology field. Get this into the distorted reality in your head: Women don't like engineering!! Sure, there are exceptions. But women simply like other things. Because they are women! Why would they have to run after male ideals. (Engineering as a ideal job for your life, is a male ideal, by the way!)
The best way to see what genders like, is to look at the smallest children, offer them toys for both genders, and see what they prefer to play with. They actually tested this. And boys simply like to build, while girls like to care for others.
The only really weird thing is, that "building" somehow is seen as better than "caring". And the weirdest thing is, that the most hard-core feminists strongly support this very male-centered view on ideals.
Uuum, must be a really sad sad life you live, with views like "Being in the center of a group, leading them, is oh so horrible!", "I don't like lap dances, even from really hot strangers." and "Ewww, humans! They could give me diseases!".
Maybe you just never really get any of that......then again, it may be, *because* you act like that. (And the circle closes. ^^)
Seriously. How fucked up of a society do you have to be, to feel a urge to apologize for offering free lap dances??
Everybody, who would, on response to "Free lap dances for EVERYONE!!" not go "NO thanks! This is disgusting!", and yet acts like this is some dirty unacceptable thing, is a hypocrite, and should just shut up!
Creating an AMD-like open-source strategy at NVIDIA would be time intensive and unlikely.
No it would NOT. You just add a license to the files, that lie right on your computer, run "git init" in that directory, and upload it to the web. Done! The real reason is, that much of what makes your most expensive GPUs "differ" from the cheapest ones, is in the driver. Including some functionality, that you claim to be in the hardware.
Re:Why the need to 'discover' the elements?
on
Element 114 Verified
·
· Score: 1
"Waitpeople"? For real?? Is that "political correctness" (=being pathetic) gone horribly wrong?
Wanna know what will fuck with your head in that case? The question: "What? Are men too good to call themselves 'waitresses'? Do they think they are something better?"
And why is that so? Because Microsoft deliberately does not document vital things, to limit the integration that others can do. While they themselves of course always can ask their colleaguen, in case they didn't develop that part of the API themselves.
That's the fault of the Ubuntu repository maintainers. I don't know what the Ubuntu equivalent is, but have you tried something like the D (stands for deep) in "emerge -uD world".
And my brother still insists, that we are not evolving backwards...
Shit, I would not even blink with an eye, to burn up every single one of those drooling retards that would want to hurt him for this. Were are we? in the dark ages??
That's what reverse natural selection — the fostering and supporting of the worst parts of society, while insulting and mistreating the best from the very beginning of education — does for you.
Nothing against theories. Even the wild ones. But bring verifiable predictions, or stop acting as if it were a real theory. It's just an idea. And a pretty bad one to start with.
Mainly because, of all the stupid time travel models that were made up in movies, it is based on the by far stupidest. The one where you can cause time paradoxes, and there is somehow just one time line. If there were some influence trough time, then that would mean the creation of new time lines. Just like you could kill your father and still live. Because you still came out of the time line where your father lived. You just could never return to it, but only to the newly created one(s), where your father would not exist anymore. Simple. Paradox-free. But that would destroy the theory. ^^
And I am willing to bet any money you and I have, that they *will* be able to perform the proper experiments. In fact, I am willing to bet all I own, including my life and body on it. Go on. Bet against me.:)
Sure, let's talk about Apache then: Apache 2.2.x, 17 advisories, 28 vulnerabilities, 2 unpatched. IIS 7.x, 2 advisories, 2 vulnerabilities, all patched. Are you going to apologize now? I didn't think so.
Oh boy. You fail so much, it's not even funny.
What you mean are published vulnerabilities. What you are not mentioning are - those than MS and the crackers know exactly about, and - those that linger in the code, because nobody can check for them
Apache has more *known* vulnerabilities. This is something *completely different* from just more vulnerabilities. With IIS, they are simply not known. And why not?
Because MS sued websites listing unofficial vulnerabilities into oblivion!
It's just as true as a normal user. With Linux, you can *always* track down the source problem. There are tons of logs to grep, log levels to raise, bug trackers, forums, and the e-mail of the developer is often *right in the code*! Nothing like a direct chat with the human behind your program.
In Windows, you're lost. You just have to guess. Sometimes you just give up, and live with it.
This is one of the main reasons, I can't live without Linux anymore. I can rely on getting it to work in the end, like nothinq else! (The other reason is the scriptability. How the system grows around you. With so many tiny scripts and changes, that it really fits like a glove. Nothing can beat that. Ever.)
___ * Although I have a business model that allows open sourcing. Because software never was a product and never will be. It's a service. Treat it like one.
I've had basic functionality break between releases
You mean just like with Vista?
Hey, there's now IBM for contracts. I think it needs just one big company, expecting IBM to keep Ubuntu working on upgrades, we all profit from it. We might already.
Then the developers of *the programs* changed their software, to be compatible. Something that is much easier with the completely open Wine and the high-performance Linux platform underneath.
It's the cycle of the pathetic. Developers write for MS, because everybody uses it. Users use it, because everybody develops for it. Cycle closed.
Ok, it's 10 years or experience, if you count like those taxi-driver types. ^^
And luckily, I noticed that I forgot to mention, what is already mentioned here: http://ask.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1411459&cid=29811941 To clone the test data in the other direction: from the live servers, to to the staging server, to the dev systems.
I don't think backups should need to be mentioned. They are expected from every company. Period. The nice thing about using GIT, is that backups are very easy with it. Just clone the staging server repository every night.
Slashdot Mirror
Uuum, who said that women would not get lap dances by men? Have you ever seen women, when a hot lap dancer is around?? They are even worse than men! And I really like them for it! At least one thing where they act like natural humans.
And about the technology field. Get this into the distorted reality in your head: Women don't like engineering!!
Sure, there are exceptions. But women simply like other things. Because they are women!
Why would they have to run after male ideals. (Engineering as a ideal job for your life, is a male ideal, by the way!)
The best way to see what genders like, is to look at the smallest children, offer them toys for both genders, and see what they prefer to play with.
They actually tested this. And boys simply like to build, while girls like to care for others.
The only really weird thing is, that "building" somehow is seen as better than "caring". And the weirdest thing is, that the most hard-core feminists strongly support this very male-centered view on ideals.
You mean they're not like Japan, with rubber pussies and school girls' panties, sold from vending machines?
Oh, I take it, that you never tried a lap dance with too tight underwear... right?
By the way: How do you feel the rub, if the towel is between you?
Uuum, must be a really sad sad life you live, with views like "Being in the center of a group, leading them, is oh so horrible!", "I don't like lap dances, even from really hot strangers." and "Ewww, humans! They could give me diseases!".
Maybe you just never really get any of that... ...then again, it may be, *because* you act like that.
(And the circle closes. ^^)
*Live* your life! You only got one! :)
There are some gays and lesbian women looking like men here though. I guess they could form such a wing.
Seriously. How fucked up of a society do you have to be, to feel a urge to apologize for offering free lap dances??
Everybody, who would, on response to "Free lap dances for EVERYONE!!" not go "NO thanks! This is disgusting!", and yet acts like this is some dirty unacceptable thing, is a hypocrite, and should just shut up!
When a computer-generated life-form shows more emotions, you know it must be... Keanu Reeves. ^^
Perhaps they are. Unfortunately, we will never find out. :P
Uuum, that would assume that there actually are parts inspired by a "divinity".
Are you drunk, or already infected? ^^
Well, in Gentoo's Portage, the nvidia-drivers ebuild states the sources as:
SRC_URI="x86? ( ftp://download.nvidia.com/XFree86/Linux-x86/${PV}/${X86_NV_PACKAGE}-pkg0.run )
amd64? ( ftp://download.nvidia.com/XFree86/Linux-x86_64/${PV}/${AMD64_NV_PACKAGE}-pkg2.run )
x86-fbsd? ( ftp://download.nvidia.com/freebsd/${PV}/${X86_FBSD_NV_PACKAGE}.tar.gz )"
Why waste the own mirrors' bandwidth on it? ^^
Creating an AMD-like open-source strategy at NVIDIA would be time intensive and unlikely.
No it would NOT. You just add a license to the files, that lie right on your computer, run "git init" in that directory, and upload it to the web. Done!
The real reason is, that much of what makes your most expensive GPUs "differ" from the cheapest ones, is in the driver. Including some functionality, that you claim to be in the hardware.
"Waitpeople"? For real?? Is that "political correctness" (=being pathetic) gone horribly wrong?
Wanna know what will fuck with your head in that case?
The question: "What? Are men too good to call themselves 'waitresses'? Do they think they are something better?"
MUHAHAHAHAAA... ^^
Mine goes to 128. So it's still good for some time. :)
And why is that so? Because Microsoft deliberately does not document vital things, to limit the integration that others can do. While they themselves of course always can ask their colleaguen, in case they didn't develop that part of the API themselves.
That's the fault of the Ubuntu repository maintainers. I don't know what the Ubuntu equivalent is, but have you tried something like the D (stands for deep) in "emerge -uD world".
And my brother still insists, that we are not evolving backwards...
Shit, I would not even blink with an eye, to burn up every single one of those drooling retards that would want to hurt him for this. Were are we? in the dark ages??
That's what reverse natural selection — the fostering and supporting of the worst parts of society, while insulting and mistreating the best from the very beginning of education — does for you.
Uuum, where have you been? It is up and running!
I hope they get it running by new year's eve. So all the monkey boys and time travel loonies can all shoot themselves and their sorry cult. ^^
Nothing against theories. Even the wild ones. But bring verifiable predictions, or stop acting as if it were a real theory. It's just an idea. And a pretty bad one to start with.
Mainly because, of all the stupid time travel models that were made up in movies, it is based on the by far stupidest. The one where you can cause time paradoxes, and there is somehow just one time line.
If there were some influence trough time, then that would mean the creation of new time lines. Just like you could kill your father and still live. Because you still came out of the time line where your father lived. You just could never return to it, but only to the newly created one(s), where your father would not exist anymore. Simple. Paradox-free.
But that would destroy the theory. ^^
And I am willing to bet any money you and I have, that they *will* be able to perform the proper experiments. In fact, I am willing to bet all I own, including my life and body on it. Go on. Bet against me. :)
Sure about that? Remember the story of the student, who got into trouble, because he used an OS with a command prompt?
Never underestimate, how retarded people can be.
Sure, let's talk about Apache then: Apache 2.2.x, 17 advisories, 28 vulnerabilities, 2 unpatched. IIS 7.x, 2 advisories, 2 vulnerabilities, all patched. Are you going to apologize now? I didn't think so.
Oh boy. You fail so much, it's not even funny.
What you mean are published vulnerabilities. What you are not mentioning are
- those than MS and the crackers know exactly about, and
- those that linger in the code, because nobody can check for them
Apache has more *known* vulnerabilities. This is something *completely different* from just more vulnerabilities.
With IIS, they are simply not known. And why not?
Because MS sued websites listing unofficial vulnerabilities into oblivion!
We sorted your argument out a looooong time ago.
My exact experience.*
It's just as true as a normal user. With Linux, you can *always* track down the source problem. There are tons of logs to grep, log levels to raise, bug trackers, forums, and the e-mail of the developer is often *right in the code*! Nothing like a direct chat with the human behind your program.
In Windows, you're lost. You just have to guess. Sometimes you just give up, and live with it.
This is one of the main reasons, I can't live without Linux anymore. I can rely on getting it to work in the end, like nothinq else!
(The other reason is the scriptability. How the system grows around you. With so many tiny scripts and changes, that it really fits like a glove. Nothing can beat that. Ever.)
___
* Although I have a business model that allows open sourcing. Because software never was a product and never will be. It's a service. Treat it like one.
I've had basic functionality break between releases
You mean just like with Vista?
Hey, there's now IBM for contracts. I think it needs just one big company, expecting IBM to keep Ubuntu working on upgrades, we all profit from it. We might already.
Oh. You mean like with Vista at the beginning?
Then the developers of *the programs* changed their software, to be compatible. Something that is much easier with the completely open Wine and the high-performance Linux platform underneath.
It's the cycle of the pathetic. Developers write for MS, because everybody uses it. Users use it, because everybody develops for it. Cycle closed.
Don't act like you're not a part of it.
Lool. I guess the lem> was a Freudian slip. It's the exact part that I still have sleepless nights over. So please forgive me. :))
Ok, it's 10 years or experience, if you count like those taxi-driver types. ^^
And luckily, I noticed that I forgot to mention, what is already mentioned here: http://ask.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1411459&cid=29811941
To clone the test data in the other direction: from the live servers, to to the staging server, to the dev systems.
I don't think backups should need to be mentioned. They are expected from every company. Period.
The nice thing about using GIT, is that backups are very easy with it. Just clone the staging server repository every night.