The point it, that we already have laws for this. You find the guys setting up the site. You prove that they do. And you put them in jail. Then you confiscate all the belongings. Including the site.
But hey, that would actually help the children. But our government apparently likes to protect the raping of children. Why else would they so strongly try to hide it, and do nothing against the raping itself?
Our government broke constitutional law, article 5, section 1 ("Eine Zensur findet nicht statt." = ""Censorship does not happen."), which makes them, by the rules of our constitution, a anticonstitutional, criminal organization. Does anyone with law knowledge know, how this is meant to be enforced in this case? Because, if it is constitutional to shoot them (or do anything else), I'd be the first do do so. I think there is no bigger criminal offense, than breaking such basic constitutional laws. Especially if you are the government.
Apparently, the Neil McAllister (whoever that is, and why ever he thinks he is relevant) of that summary did not understand the main point.
The point of the difference in complexity, of setting up a Apache, and FTP server, and all that stuff, versus just using your browser. That is the thing. Now everyone can be the other side of the net. In just a few seconds, and without learning how to do it professionally.
While I love my custom-built Gentoo root server, I can not expect my mom to do the same thing, just to send me a file. She can't even use Rapidshare and similar sites.
Especially as long as they have people like you, being their strongest believers. You have to understand the principle of mindsets and strong realities.
A strong reality needs two sides. The one stating it. And the other, believing in it. Which you do in such a strong way, that you really think, lobbying power will never end.
But the first step to change this situation... even before doing anything... is to start believing that this will change, and that we will change it. If your reality is stronger, others (especially the mindless ones) will start to believe in you, instead of them. And if this goes on with enough strength, and for long enough, it will change. Because then people will allow themselves, to think up, and get trough, with ideas that realistically work.
You can learn this in psychology.
I say: You are over 300 million people. MILLION. Against what? A hand full of ISPs? And you think you can't put a stronger lobbying force together? Are you freaking kidding me? Half the hillbillies already follow you, when you tell them that this grassroots power is in the true philosophy of the USA. (Be sure to emphasize "USA".);))
Well, had you kept some gold from before the crisis, then you could buy six times the money you bought it with with it. When the economy falls, the price of gold always rises. Keeping you safe from any bad times.
What do you thing the big fatcats did? Invest in things that keep their worth, like houses, gold, real material things. Not that fake stuff called money. And thereby they made themselves even richer, relative to you.
That's what gold is there for.
But go on. Get another credit to pay your last credit, until you're realizing you've long become a slave.
If you had bought gold, and then ran on a local gold-based economy only, before the "crisis", you would now be able to buy six times more with it, than before. Or in other words: The "crisis" would not even have touched you.
The rule to avoid them fucking you up is simple: Don't use their money. At all.
I am in the process of developing an MMO. And the in-game currency will be gold-based. Meaning you can legally exchange it to other "real-world" currencies. And get gold for it. They will not be called "credits", because a credit-based currency/economy is a major crime. Maybe this will help get people started in becoming independent from that system.
Uuum... whey don't they put some of those new light printed solar cells on top of it. Should give them all the power they need. (Assuming they float way above the clouds and have a night battery buffer.)
Which is the rule for all good art. If you always seek to please everyone, you will lose, or create stuff like Britney Spears and Electronic Arts.
The point is that great leaders give a lead, and make you believe that this is the best thing ever. If you seek to please everyone, you do not lead.
It's also the same rule that makes the men that know what they want more attractive, and defines the unspoken hierarchy in a group (where a tramp can be above a queen).
The best thing to make this clear to noobs, is to explain, how our complete skin is coated with bacteria (protecting us), and our digestive system would not work without them.
It's not about bacteria or no bacteria. It's about the right kind. Our symbiont/allies so to speak. Some bacteria can even change your character, by living inside of you. (Beware, that there are negative versions of this too!)
I wonder, why those Scientists always think in such extremely limited ways?
As if the form of extraterrestrial life would even be close to genetics, cells, plants, animals and other lifeforms with hands, eyes, brains out or neurons, a head, etc.
They will not even see extraterrestrial life, when it sits/floats right in front of them.
She did not steal anything. Even your quotes don't make your statement OK. First of all, "stealing" involves the original owner not having it anymore. Second, the it suspected of copyright infringement. I don't know how it's in your country, but saying that someone did it, before the judge decided it, is a criminal offense here in Germany. So if you were here, you could be sued right now.
And finally: You are right that you are as familiar with the case (and the law) as anyone with Internet and access to news. Which means you don't now anything, and repeat the RIAA FUD, that general "news" parrot too. Luckily, on this site, there is a higher standard. Wait for your +5, Insightful, to go to -2, Troll.
There is no bigger risk for a game developer, than to have his entire project being blocked, because some company found it "objectionable" Which could also mean: We have a deal with your competitor. (Usually EA.)
Give me a standardized platform that is not dependent on a single company (=point of failure), and you have a developer studio on your side.
Allright then! *hopes they have not seen the educational movie "how not to be seen"*
HAI
I HAZ A GVRNMNT
IM IN YR LOOP
VISIBLE "FIRE!"! AUDBL "*BANG*""
NERFZ GVRNMNT!!
IZ GVRNMNT LIEK 0?
YARLY
KTHXBYE!
NOWAI
VISIBLE "MOAR!"
KTHX
KTHX KTHXBYE
Slashdot Mirror
Even deleting is way past the point.
The point it, that we already have laws for this.
You find the guys setting up the site. You prove that they do. And you put them in jail.
Then you confiscate all the belongings. Including the site.
But hey, that would actually help the children. But our government apparently likes to protect the raping of children. Why else would they so strongly try to hide it, and do nothing against the raping itself?
Our government broke constitutional law, article 5, section 1 ("Eine Zensur findet nicht statt." = ""Censorship does not happen."), which makes them, by the rules of our constitution, a anticonstitutional, criminal organization. Does anyone with law knowledge know, how this is meant to be enforced in this case? Because, if it is constitutional to shoot them (or do anything else), I'd be the first do do so. I think there is no bigger criminal offense, than breaking such basic constitutional laws. Especially if you are the government.
Apparently, the Neil McAllister (whoever that is, and why ever he thinks he is relevant) of that summary did not understand the main point.
The point of the difference in complexity, of setting up a Apache, and FTP server, and all that stuff, versus just using your browser.
That is the thing. Now everyone can be the other side of the net. In just a few seconds, and without learning how to do it professionally.
While I love my custom-built Gentoo root server, I can not expect my mom to do the same thing, just to send me a file. She can't even use Rapidshare and similar sites.
Especially as long as they have people like you, being their strongest believers.
You have to understand the principle of mindsets and strong realities.
A strong reality needs two sides. The one stating it. And the other, believing in it.
Which you do in such a strong way, that you really think, lobbying power will never end.
But the first step to change this situation... even before doing anything... is to start believing that this will change, and that we will change it.
If your reality is stronger, others (especially the mindless ones) will start to believe in you, instead of them.
And if this goes on with enough strength, and for long enough, it will change. Because then people will allow themselves, to think up, and get trough, with ideas that realistically work.
You can learn this in psychology.
I say: You are over 300 million people. MILLION. Against what? A hand full of ISPs? And you think you can't put a stronger lobbying force together? Are you freaking kidding me? ;))
Half the hillbillies already follow you, when you tell them that this grassroots power is in the true philosophy of the USA. (Be sure to emphasize "USA".)
Well, had you kept some gold from before the crisis, then you could buy six times the money you bought it with with it. When the economy falls, the price of gold always rises. Keeping you safe from any bad times.
What do you thing the big fatcats did? Invest in things that keep their worth, like houses, gold, real material things. Not that fake stuff called money.
And thereby they made themselves even richer, relative to you.
That's what gold is there for.
But go on. Get another credit to pay your last credit, until you're realizing you've long become a slave.
For 250 bucks you will not get a bar. Rather a small coin.
Yeah. That's how worthless that credit-based "money" is.
And in two years, you will get 350 bucks for the same coin it.
If you had bought gold, and then ran on a local gold-based economy only, before the "crisis", you would now be able to buy six times more with it, than before. Or in other words: The "crisis" would not even have touched you.
The rule to avoid them fucking you up is simple: Don't use their money. At all.
I am in the process of developing an MMO. And the in-game currency will be gold-based. Meaning you can legally exchange it to other "real-world" currencies. And get gold for it.
They will not be called "credits", because a credit-based currency/economy is a major crime.
Maybe this will help get people started in becoming independent from that system.
I wonder when he will notice that Funny does not give karma...
Uuum... whey don't they put some of those new light printed solar cells on top of it. Should give them all the power they need. (Assuming they float way above the clouds and have a night battery buffer.)
*BANG*
I wonder if you can shoot them...
I guess not, except if your bullets reach low earth orbit. ;)
...will be the ping/lag. Like trying to play CPMA with someone in UAE.
Well, better than nothing. :)
Which is the rule for all good art. If you always seek to please everyone, you will lose, or create stuff like Britney Spears and Electronic Arts.
The point is that great leaders give a lead, and make you believe that this is the best thing ever. If you seek to please everyone, you do not lead.
It's also the same rule that makes the men that know what they want more attractive, and defines the unspoken hierarchy in a group (where a tramp can be above a queen).
Hey moderators: If you do not get it, keep your mod points. You just look like idiots, that way.
I know, I know: I must be new here. ;)
Who would have thunk of that?
And guess what: This is the case for all websites, which do not sell real products or services that are worth money.
I also add: http://navid.radiantempire.com/pub/danke_hauptmann.jpg
Just add "|http://c.fsdn.com/sd/cs_sic_controls_new.png?*" to your blocking rules in Adblock Plus, and they are gone forever.
How is it more irresponsible than walking on a crowded sidewalk, or being anywhere where people are... like in a subway train?
The best thing to make this clear to noobs, is to explain, how our complete skin is coated with bacteria (protecting us), and our digestive system would not work without them.
It's not about bacteria or no bacteria. It's about the right kind. Our symbiont/allies so to speak.
Some bacteria can even change your character, by living inside of you. (Beware, that there are negative versions of this too!)
Ask Hubert J. Farnsworth. The microbe can't infect him too, because it's are not compatible with a lifeform that old.
You got it all wrong. Wolf Blitzer ate the kids, the gingerbread house, the UN inspectors, Santa's reindeer, and then became Rush Limbaugh.
I wonder, why those Scientists always think in such extremely limited ways?
As if the form of extraterrestrial life would even be close to genetics, cells, plants, animals and other lifeforms with hands, eyes, brains out or neurons, a head, etc.
They will not even see extraterrestrial life, when it sits/floats right in front of them.
She did not steal anything. Even your quotes don't make your statement OK.
First of all, "stealing" involves the original owner not having it anymore.
Second, the it suspected of copyright infringement.
I don't know how it's in your country, but saying that someone did it, before the judge decided it, is a criminal offense here in Germany. So if you were here, you could be sued right now.
And finally: You are right that you are as familiar with the case (and the law) as anyone with Internet and access to news. Which means you don't now anything, and repeat the RIAA FUD, that general "news" parrot too. Luckily, on this site, there is a higher standard. Wait for your +5, Insightful, to go to -2, Troll.
You mean like the built-in RSS reader on my Nokia phone?
There is no bigger risk for a game developer, than to have his entire project being blocked, because some company found it "objectionable"
Which could also mean: We have a deal with your competitor. (Usually EA.)
Give me a standardized platform that is not dependent on a single company (=point of failure), and you have a developer studio on your side.
Allright then! *hopes they have not seen the educational movie "how not to be seen"*
lolrus@icanhascheezburger.com ~ $ ./sjlol.py gvrnmnt.lol
FAIL: INFINITZ LOOPXORZ!
Doubleplusgood, or doubleminusgood?
Whatever... it almost tastes like meat. :P