AS U MITE HAS READ OR NOTICD, PEEPS ONCE AGAIN R TRYIN 2 SHUT US DOWN. DIS WILL NOT SUCCED, LOL. OURS RLY NICE WEBHOST WUZ THREATEND WIF RLY HUGE FINE, SO WE DECIDD 2 MOOVTEH SIET SO DAT THEY DIDNT GOT INTO TROUBLE, LOL. TEH DECISHUN 2 MOOV WUZ TAKEN BY US, TEH PIRATE BAY, LOL.
TEH PIRATE BAY IZ AN UNSINKABLE SHIP. IT WILL SAIL TEH INTERWEBS 4 AS LONG AS WE WANTS IT 2. REMEMBR DAT, K THX.
The reason are deliberately vague bullshit terms like “urgent”. You can say a specific number. Like how much time is left. But you can’t say “very urgent”, and much less only “urgent” without anything. Because it’s entierly meaningless. It’s like saying: “This car is 50% faster.”. 50% faster than WHAT?
But don’t forget that that limit for “when you’re obese” is only a rough average. Some people would become very sick when they would have to adhere to those standards.
Get to the weight that you yourself feel best with. (Obviously that isn’t a good idea of your feeling itself is off, like with anorexia.)
Of course to real scientists there is no point to NOT run both in parallel. There’s plenty of stuff the Tevatron can still do. Oh, and maybe they should go big, and say that the US must be first again, and build a XLHC (extremely large hadron collider), crossing the whole country from coast to coast. ^^
If you think they all were fat, then you obviously never saw an actual woman naked, and only know those anorexic models. (And no, I’m not one of those who thinks that actually fat people are not fat.)
In the first place, science has no place rating attractiveness. Beauty is *supposed* to be subjective, not objective. Imagine, for a moment if how someone might feel if their body shape had been *scientifically proven* unattractive. Nothing good can come of this.
What kind of talk is this? Says who? You sound like a religious zealot trying to make excuses for why some thing “should be left unexplained” like “the magic of love”. Bullshit. There is no magic. There is no “has no place in”. there in no “supposed”. (And even if, you would’nt know it anyway). And it’s also not about objectivity vs. subjectivity. You just made that up. There is so such thing as objectivity in reality.
And most importantly, it is completely irrelevant how someone might feel, when he heart the freakin’ physical facts! Yes, there are IN FACT body shapes that are unattractive. And you could prove it. So what? There are people who run faster, are smarter, look better. So. what? Are you afraid to lose your illusion and thereby your self-acceptance? Well, you must already be pretty weak then.
How about not caring so much about that shit. I am also fat. I am not that large. And I can sweat a lot. So? I am also smart, think many parts of my body look good, and people generally like me much. I do the best with what I have, and define what looks sexy, trough me changing perception of what is good. How’s that, instead of letting others define you imaginary “limits”?
A normal guy wouldn't rate a woman 0-10 in his head, but rather a "yes" or a "no",
You apparently have no idea what an average guy thinks. And you also aren’t one.
I can not explain how you never heard a guy say “she’s a 10” or something like that. You must have never gone out with friends. Ever. Even if they don”t use numbers: Sure there always are gradients.
Or do you live in a black/white world with no gray area? Oh wait, you live in bitspace, and now think in the real world there also only are 0 and 1.
___ Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING. Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING. Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.
But I have something even more interesting: They did the exact same thing in the Ukraine. It’s what you may know as the “orange revolution”. All the people you saw on TV, with the orange stuff... those were CIA extras and agents. It came all out, when the agent that became the president (Viktor Yushchenko) was thrown out again, since the election was found to be completely rigged. It’s interesting how the premise was, that Russia would rig the elections, when really, the US did. (Or actually, I think they both did.)
Slashdot Mirror
Plant some “evidence”.
There. Done.
You are talking about thermite fires. Yes, they can be a lot of fun if you are not anywhere close. ^^
You forgot the emphasis:
AS U MITE HAS READ OR NOTICD, PEEPS ONCE AGAIN R TRYIN 2 SHUT US DOWN. DIS WILL NOT SUCCED, LOL. OURS RLY NICE WEBHOST WUZ THREATEND WIF RLY HUGE FINE, SO WE DECIDD 2 MOOV TEH SIET SO DAT THEY DIDNT GOT INTO TROUBLE, LOL.
TEH DECISHUN 2 MOOV WUZ TAKEN BY US, TEH PIRATE BAY, LOL.
TEH PIRATE BAY IZ AN UNSINKABLE SHIP. IT WILL SAIL TEH INTERWEBS 4 AS LONG AS WE WANTS IT 2. REMEMBR DAT, K THX.
TPB, ONLY IN IT 4 TEH LULZ SINCE 2003
Completely irrelevant. Since that is no reason not to at least try it.
The reason are deliberately vague bullshit terms like “urgent”. You can say a specific number. Like how much time is left. But you can’t say “very urgent”, and much less only “urgent” without anything. Because it’s entierly meaningless.
It’s like saying: “This car is 50% faster.”. 50% faster than WHAT?
Well, you can vote for them. And that forces the government to give them money. Now isn’t that nice? :)
But don’t forget that that limit for “when you’re obese” is only a rough average. Some people would become very sick when they would have to adhere to those standards.
Get to the weight that you yourself feel best with. (Obviously that isn’t a good idea of your feeling itself is off, like with anorexia.)
Excuse: It’s what the doctor ordered. ;)
It's been known for a long time that the standard model has problems.
Well, of course. With them all being anorexic and on drugs, you can see their problems when looking at their bodies. ;)
Of course to real scientists there is no point to NOT run both in parallel. There’s plenty of stuff the Tevatron can still do.
Oh, and maybe they should go big, and say that the US must be first again, and build a XLHC (extremely large hadron collider), crossing the whole country from coast to coast. ^^
The treaty was written and signed to create terrorism
There, fixed that for ya.
Look up “terrorism”. It’s the act of creating terror. And such fearmongering is the exact point of the whole operation.
If you think they all were fat, then you obviously never saw an actual woman naked, and only know those anorexic models. (And no, I’m not one of those who thinks that actually fat people are not fat.)
Hey chemgeeks! Get your own Slashdot! ;)
In the first place, science has no place rating attractiveness. Beauty is *supposed* to be subjective, not objective. Imagine, for a moment if how someone might feel if their body shape had been *scientifically proven* unattractive. Nothing good can come of this.
What kind of talk is this? Says who? You sound like a religious zealot trying to make excuses for why some thing “should be left unexplained” like “the magic of love”.
Bullshit. There is no magic. There is no “has no place in”. there in no “supposed”. (And even if, you would’nt know it anyway).
And it’s also not about objectivity vs. subjectivity. You just made that up. There is so such thing as objectivity in reality.
And most importantly, it is completely irrelevant how someone might feel, when he heart the freakin’ physical facts!
Yes, there are IN FACT body shapes that are unattractive. And you could prove it. So what? There are people who run faster, are smarter, look better. So. what?
Are you afraid to lose your illusion and thereby your self-acceptance? Well, you must already be pretty weak then.
How about not caring so much about that shit. I am also fat. I am not that large. And I can sweat a lot. So? I am also smart, think many parts of my body look good, and people generally like me much. I do the best with what I have, and define what looks sexy, trough me changing perception of what is good. How’s that, instead of letting others define you imaginary “limits”?
A normal guy wouldn't rate a woman 0-10 in his head, but rather a "yes" or a "no",
You apparently have no idea what an average guy thinks. And you also aren’t one.
I can not explain how you never heard a guy say “she’s a 10” or something like that. You must have never gone out with friends. Ever. Even if they don”t use numbers: Sure there always are gradients.
Or do you live in a black/white world with no gray area?
Oh wait, you live in bitspace, and now think in the real world there also only are 0 and 1.
But she’s also insanely hot. I can haz hawt bittsecks wif her??
All a man in the middle attack has to do is read the message, recreate it, and send out a spoofed message instead of the original message.
Reading the message is trivial.
You don’t understand quantum physics AT ALL, do you? Or you’re just a troll.
Read up on entanglement.
There is no way to recreate the message. Because you can’t entangle the photons again. It’s literally physically impossible.
Even then - MOST PEOPLE JUST WON'T FUCKING CARE!
AND THAT IS THE EXACT FUCKING PROBLEM!
___
Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.
Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.
Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.
Interesting. I didn’t knew that.
But I have something even more interesting: They did the exact same thing in the Ukraine. It’s what you may know as the “orange revolution”.
All the people you saw on TV, with the orange stuff... those were CIA extras and agents.
It came all out, when the agent that became the president (Viktor Yushchenko) was thrown out again, since the election was found to be completely rigged. It’s interesting how the premise was, that Russia would rig the elections, when really, the US did. (Or actually, I think they both did.)
Because he gets to keep his gold man-sacks?
Yeah well, and yo momma is so drunk, that the stench of cheap booze is only drowned by the vomit in her beard. :P
Oh boy, you are so wrong it’s not even funny.
Because your 100000 light years premise is wrong.
A black hole also doesn’t even remotely have the diameter of a normal star.
I bet a black hole with all the stars of a galaxy in it, would still not be bigger than maybe a pretty large star.
It’s mass that counts. Not radius.
Those “galaxy cores” look nothing like galaxy cores at all. They look like much closer stars.
I want to see a distance measurement on those “cores” before I believe any of it.
My guess would be that the reason for this is, that you compare them to OpenBSD. ^^
You mean like preferring an ass rape to living in a Gulag? ;)