After reading this article I was quite disappointed.
It's an extension of whitelist mechanism with some graph theory included. ( and quite too much theory for something so simple...)
As stated in the article:
The most obvious contermeasure is to never use multiple recipients in the To: or Cc: headers of a spam message.
It sounds like BCC: and there is nothing special about it. It's quite widely used. Most of my spam comes without CC: or multi recipients.
It would certainly be very interesting for ISP, because they can track many emails at a time. The main issue would be the size of the graph induced (less CPU intensive -> more MEM intensive) and privacy.
But it's definitely not for individuals.
I keep this for generating examples for bayesian analysis, that's all:
Using this algorithm, it would be possible to generate training sets for learning algorithms in achieving accurate, automated spam filtering.
Also nice graphs... perhaps to big at the end...
Oh my god!!
on
Opengroupware
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
They did that ? They bring everything to the Mobile?!
I can't manage to understand where is the real challenge in bringing such things to Mobile ? Since most of Mobile use WAP or i-Mode, you can display anything on it with format similar to HTML.
In this case, the challenge is: make a good UI, nothing more, I think.
Not really interested, I think I handle it quite well... when I type correctly.:D
So I should learn to type... but I don't pay attention to comments which don't really impose it.
(Surprise, i payed attention to my reply to your post!:) Enjoy!:c) )
The devil is in the details.
Damn right... it's in the details... And like details in Java are not used, detaisl in C# too. Details don't represent a big improve, because if you use details, that most of people don't know (remeber, most of people comme from VB!) then your code is much more difficult to read.
You can make a fully compliant CLR on another platform which never goes near COM but still runs full.NET applications.
You wish! Even the M$ representatives say, you can't be fully compliant, because the API is not public. Just take a look at Mono !
...but at least it's far more consistent than PHP is or probably will ever be.
PHP5 should be equivalent to ASP for OO, but please ASP.NET is not really interesting, compared to PHP: facility, ease of use...
Return to class, you obviously have some catching-up to do.
You should attend to one!!:)
I have achieved it! (MsC)
I was in the audience of one of the.Net Presentation some months ago... I must admit I was quite impressed by Web Services, OO, Program Once/Run Anywhere, etc...
But, Web Services are absolutely not related to.Net, even if it's marketed as such (J2EE Business in the target... say hello!!:) ).
C# is interesting but too much inspired by Java... nothing so new or useful at this time.
This f*****g CLR is not portable, because old.COM is included in!
And finally ASP.NET is lol!
It could be great, if you keep your eyes closed , and whisper... but it sucks.
Please compare the ratio knowledge/price of a video game with the one of a book... and your argument is even better.
The question is how do nowadays peple access knowledge ? It was book, now through computers... but no way, games are not for learning, except very basic things...
Slashdot Mirror
It's an extension of whitelist mechanism with some graph theory included. ( and quite too much theory for something so simple...)
As stated in the article:
It sounds like BCC: and there is nothing special about it. It's quite widely used. Most of my spam comes without CC: or multi recipients.
It would certainly be very interesting for ISP, because they can track many emails at a time. The main issue would be the size of the graph induced (less CPU intensive -> more MEM intensive) and privacy.
But it's definitely not for individuals.
I keep this for generating examples for bayesian analysis, that's all:
Also nice graphs... perhaps to big at the end...
They did that ? They bring everything to the Mobile?!
I can't manage to understand where is the real challenge in bringing such things to Mobile ?
Since most of Mobile use WAP or i-Mode, you can display anything on it with format similar to HTML.
In this case, the challenge is: make a good UI, nothing more, I think.
Not really interested, I think I handle it quite well... when I type correctly. :D
So I should learn to type... but I don't pay attention to comments which don't really impose it.
(Surprise, i payed attention to my reply to your post! :) Enjoy! :c) )
The devil is in the details.
.NET applications.
You wish! Even the M$ representatives say, you can't be fully compliant, because the API is not public. Just take a look at Mono !
...but at least it's far more consistent than PHP is or probably will ever be. ...
:)
Damn right... it's in the details... And like details in Java are not used, detaisl in C# too. Details don't represent a big improve, because if you use details, that most of people don't know (remeber, most of people comme from VB!) then your code is much more difficult to read.
You can make a fully compliant CLR on another platform which never goes near COM but still runs full
PHP5 should be equivalent to ASP for OO, but please ASP.NET is not really interesting, compared to PHP: facility, ease of use
Return to class, you obviously have some catching-up to do.
You should attend to one!!
I have achieved it! (MsC)
I was in the audience of one of the .Net Presentation some months ago... I must admit I was quite impressed by Web Services, OO, Program Once/Run Anywhere, etc...
But, Web Services are absolutely not related to .Net, even if it's marketed as such (J2EE Business in the target... say hello!! :) ).
C# is interesting but too much inspired by Java... nothing so new or useful at this time.
This f*****g CLR is not portable, because old .COM is included in!
And finally ASP.NET is lol!
It could be great, if you keep your eyes closed , and whisper... but it sucks.
Please compare the ratio knowledge/price of a video game with the one of a book... and your argument is even better. The question is how do nowadays peple access knowledge ? It was book, now through computers... but no way, games are not for learning, except very basic things...
In this cas, they would not be solvent! Waste of time...
I would like to know who was the audience, and if they lisen to him ?! Any info about it ?