And who gets to decide that someone has been "ripped off"? If instead of there being a privileged class of people "creating" things I like, there was more of an effort to make tools that make it easier to bring things into existence things people like, the world would be a far better place.
I moved recently and owned all the equipment I needed. The cable modem I own is an older DOCSIS 2.0 version, and I bridge it to a wifi router. I ordered internet and got it up and running by myself the same day. Comcast didn't say a thing.
I'm not sure what the right question is that I am trying to ask, but it has something to do with sorting out what has had an influence on you and what is your own unique work.
Then there is the problem of a variation of the Chinese room argument where you got something you didn't understand at first, but then later it or elements of it showed up in your work.
Then there's the situation where "creative" people can't or won't inform outsiders how they do what they do.
It seems to me this might be why the Blurred Lines judgment went against the people who came up with Blurred Lines.
I downvoted this story but it still got through. The title overgeneralizes and there's no evidence in the summary that anyone, techie or not, actually uses the service and if anyone does, it's not likely to be a technically literate person.
The law seems to have something to say about trespassing onto the premises, but I'm uncertain what it has to say about the situation the book was in. I'm not certain what concepts are even being used much less taking them for granted. Scary thing about society is that they teach nothing about the law in K-12. I would find myself hard pressed to find any debate that isn't about subjective personal preferences are for some conventions but not others.
Throw "creative" in with create, intelligence and design as words we are all expected to just know what they are supposed to mean without really teaching what it means.
People put "valuable time" into lots of things. Doesn't mean they should get paid for it. And with people throwing around concepts like "the universe creates itself", I'm not sure anyone has a workable meaningful definition of what create or design actually means.
Phone OS's aren't speech recognition. That being said, Microsoft has had limited speech recognition for its desktop for quite awhile. http://www.bing.com/search?q=m... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
The company's research eventually ultimately led to the development of the Speech API, introduced in 1994
I can hear the difference between a low bit rate MP3 and a high bit rate MP3. I think I have a song still that's recorded in both. The funny thing is, that I can't really say that the low bit rate one sounds any worse.
Countries like Russia and the likes probably don't care much about their population's irrational fears and would much rather present a solution, if only for the "Ha ha!" aspect of it.
Which is why Russia has the most progressive sexuality laws./s
Slashdot Mirror
And who gets to decide that someone has been "ripped off"? If instead of there being a privileged class of people "creating" things I like, there was more of an effort to make tools that make it easier to bring things into existence things people like, the world would be a far better place.
It's not my responsibility to see that anybody gets paid.
Since when did rationale become synonymous with excuse?
I moved recently and owned all the equipment I needed. The cable modem I own is an older DOCSIS 2.0 version, and I bridge it to a wifi router. I ordered internet and got it up and running by myself the same day. Comcast didn't say a thing.
Then there's the song https://www.youtube.com/result...
I don't think the article described the technology very well. Anybody find a better description elsewhere?
I'm not sure what the right question is that I am trying to ask, but it has something to do with sorting out what has had an influence on you and what is your own unique work.
Then there is the problem of a variation of the Chinese room argument where you got something you didn't understand at first, but then later it or elements of it showed up in your work.
Then there's the situation where "creative" people can't or won't inform outsiders how they do what they do.
It seems to me this might be why the Blurred Lines judgment went against the people who came up with Blurred Lines.
I downvoted this story but it still got through. The title overgeneralizes and there's no evidence in the summary that anyone, techie or not, actually uses the service and if anyone does, it's not likely to be a technically literate person.
Not sure what your post has to do with the topic, but for those who are curious you are drawing from the anime, Chobits.
Nobody defines what creation means, like they don't define intelligence, or design. Do parents create their children?
The law seems to have something to say about trespassing onto the premises, but I'm uncertain what it has to say about the situation the book was in. I'm not certain what concepts are even being used much less taking them for granted. Scary thing about society is that they teach nothing about the law in K-12. I would find myself hard pressed to find any debate that isn't about subjective personal preferences are for some conventions but not others.
What is "creative work" exactly?
Care to explain what you mean by "creative" when you call yourself a "creative person"?
Throw "creative" in with create, intelligence and design as words we are all expected to just know what they are supposed to mean without really teaching what it means.
People put "valuable time" into lots of things. Doesn't mean they should get paid for it. And with people throwing around concepts like "the universe creates itself", I'm not sure anyone has a workable meaningful definition of what create or design actually means.
But only if he is a paid assassin.
I know you are being sarcastic, but maybe you really should.
http://www.bing.com/search?q=m...
Phone OS's aren't speech recognition. That being said, Microsoft has had limited speech recognition for its desktop for quite awhile.
http://www.bing.com/search?q=m...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
The company's research eventually ultimately led to the development of the Speech API, introduced in 1994
I can hear the difference between a low bit rate MP3 and a high bit rate MP3. I think I have a song still that's recorded in both. The funny thing is, that I can't really say that the low bit rate one sounds any worse.
When someone says "For reference" they should really provide references.
Step 1: Define "Scientist" as anyone who dabbles in scientific endeavors.
Step 2: Leave "peaceful nation" undefined.
Step 3: ???
Step 4: Profit!
Which is why Russia has the most progressive sexuality laws./s
You know what you are doing. Take off every Zig!
I find that element in my education frustrating. Too bad one can't successfully sue the government or other providers of education for it.
How much software do you own and how much software do you only have a license to use?