The question isn't whether or not people can utillize elements of stereo vision to help them perceive depth. They can. The question is how much of a role does it play in perceiving depth. If you paid attention to my previous post, you'd notice I said that the 3D glasses worked for me when I was young, but when I was older I had to force the images to converge in order for it to look right, but once it did, it looked 3d, so I had to come up with a reason why day to day my eyes converged but didn't produce the 3d effect, and a reason for why the image split into two in the 3d Movie.
So will we ever reach the point that vector graphics will define what we want to see better than bitmaps ever will. Right now the hard part seems to be adding enough vectors to describe the detail of a bitmap, but it seems to me the more detail in the bitmap the easier we can find an equation to fit it. What is holding back vector graphics currently?
Now, I happen to know that stereo vision plays a huge part in depth perception
At first I was going to say you know that it can, then you proceed to list two sources that have no bearing on stereo vision. Even more, to the degree that 3D can be approximated in 2d, "stereo vision" would be of no help whatsoever.
Until recently, every time I got a new prescription my depth perception would improve for a few days, and then go back to my everyday poor perception.
When I was much younger I had much better depth perception. I watched a 3D film with the special glasses at Disney World. I've watched a 3D film at an amusement park since then and the two images most of the time did not converge, but when I concentrated on getting the images to converge, the 3D illusion was back, better than my everyday non thinking about it depth perception, even though everyday perception converges. My aunt who has never had depth perception was along with me for the 3D film, saw the image split as I did, and couldn't understand when I told her that seeing the image split was nowhere near what people with depth perception see.
If I concentrate, I can get my depth perception to improve. If I have my mind on aspects of depth perception it improves.
A hologram does not trick the eyes into seeing a three dimensional image, a hologram IS a true 3D image, and while it may have a reflective backing, the hologram itself is transmissive, not reflective. If you don't have depth perception, which I don't much of the time, all 3D images look flat. You must not have much experience with holograms in which part of the image is a completely different image. You also need to read the Wikipedia article, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hologram
A key sentence:
When reconstructed, the resulting light field is identical to that which emanated from the original scene, giving a perfect three-dimensional image
When using the word "shell" I was vaguely thinking of Gnome or KDE as a shell over X Window. All I know is that the author of that page recently said that it wasn't done very well in Linux.
When someone doesn't care, it's called apathy. People keep telling me to consider what a person wants, but to do that I have to stop considering what that person will become. If the features were available for developers to use, the customer would have been better off, whether the customer as he is without the features knows enough to care about it or not.
It's pointless to wait. They yanked the Themes and folder customization from Windows 98 and replaced it with junk in XP. I wish they would simply put it back the way it was. Also they need to fix Explorer's Toolbars.
My new catchphrase is "It's not a binary concept". Slavery was a form of contract labor with a non-terminating cotract. When people sold slaves they essentially sold the contract for their labor. When a company buys another company, it buys all the contracts that company has with it's workers.
Oh? Last I checked, you haven't checked me over medically, so how do you know? You're just rehashing what you've been told about what we know can be done to infer depth info.
Remember, you can hate the diggers who submit (and digg) crap, the GNAA trolls & Adolf Hitroll but only as much as you hate your freedom to submit, digg and post yourself.
Is it something like depth perception. They keep telling me you need two eyes for depth perception, but I close one eye and I can perceive depth perhaps even better. It's like a hologram. It may even be holographic. In making a hologram, you only need one film.
Is why there's a front of an animal at all. Why do animals not have sensory organs distributed to all sides equally to prevent attack from any given direction, or at least an even distribution of each.
There's also the question of distribution from top to bottom.
Double good job appointing someone who's expectation of civil rights has been lowered, and then spinning it as if it will help him do his job. Just about anything from his perspective would be an improvement, and as you know, these days, an improvement is a job well done.
I had this idea where calculations running at one frequency and calculations running at a non-interfering frequency could be run over the same chip substrate, maybe even more than two frequencies.
Slashdot Mirror
The question isn't whether or not people can utillize elements of stereo vision to help them perceive depth. They can. The question is how much of a role does it play in perceiving depth. If you paid attention to my previous post, you'd notice I said that the 3D glasses worked for me when I was young, but when I was older I had to force the images to converge in order for it to look right, but once it did, it looked 3d, so I had to come up with a reason why day to day my eyes converged but didn't produce the 3d effect, and a reason for why the image split into two in the 3d Movie.
All contracts are contracts of property.
http://www.archive.org/ has plenty of music and video to fill your hard disk with.
s may or may not be down currently, but only over a domain name problem. http://www.the-underdogs.info/ seems to work at the moment.
...though the requisite agencies are perfectly capable of shutting down abandonware sites regarding piracy.
One might argue that http://www.animemusicvideos.org/ is piracy, but they haven't been shut down by the RIAA yet.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Home_of_the_Underdog
http://digihosters.com/~cdosorg/ more.
http://www.rockstargames.com/classics/ Rockstar makes available older games for free.
http://www.1up.com/do/feature?cId=3148013&did=1 101 best free games.
So will we ever reach the point that vector graphics will define what we want to see better than bitmaps ever will. Right now the hard part seems to be adding enough vectors to describe the detail of a bitmap, but it seems to me the more detail in the bitmap the easier we can find an equation to fit it. What is holding back vector graphics currently?
I think I'll name it "Running Gag"
The ones that lived had less corruption of the intelligent design.
Now, I happen to know that stereo vision plays a huge part in depth perception
At first I was going to say you know that it can, then you proceed to list two sources that have no bearing on stereo vision. Even more, to the degree that 3D can be approximated in 2d, "stereo vision" would be of no help whatsoever.
Until recently, every time I got a new prescription my depth perception would improve for a few days, and then go back to my everyday poor perception. When I was much younger I had much better depth perception. I watched a 3D film with the special glasses at Disney World. I've watched a 3D film at an amusement park since then and the two images most of the time did not converge, but when I concentrated on getting the images to converge, the 3D illusion was back, better than my everyday non thinking about it depth perception, even though everyday perception converges. My aunt who has never had depth perception was along with me for the 3D film, saw the image split as I did, and couldn't understand when I told her that seeing the image split was nowhere near what people with depth perception see.
If I concentrate, I can get my depth perception to improve. If I have my mind on aspects of depth perception it improves.
A hologram does not trick the eyes into seeing a three dimensional image, a hologram IS a true 3D image, and while it may have a reflective backing, the hologram itself is transmissive, not reflective. If you don't have depth perception, which I don't much of the time, all 3D images look flat. You must not have much experience with holograms in which part of the image is a completely different image. You also need to read the Wikipedia article, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hologram
A key sentence:
When reconstructed, the resulting light field is identical to that which emanated from the original scene, giving a perfect three-dimensional image
When using the word "shell" I was vaguely thinking of Gnome or KDE as a shell over X Window. All I know is that the author of that page recently said that it wasn't done very well in Linux.
NTFS has transparent compression.
File type implementation in shells available on Linux http://wyodesktop.sourceforge.net/mimetypes.html
When someone doesn't care, it's called apathy. People keep telling me to consider what a person wants, but to do that I have to stop considering what that person will become. If the features were available for developers to use, the customer would have been better off, whether the customer as he is without the features knows enough to care about it or not.
It's pointless to wait. They yanked the Themes and folder customization from Windows 98 and replaced it with junk in XP. I wish they would simply put it back the way it was. Also they need to fix Explorer's Toolbars.
Problem solved. No I don't know the relative values of the companies.
My new catchphrase is "It's not a binary concept". Slavery was a form of contract labor with a non-terminating cotract. When people sold slaves they essentially sold the contract for their labor. When a company buys another company, it buys all the contracts that company has with it's workers.
Oh? Last I checked, you haven't checked me over medically, so how do you know? You're just rehashing what you've been told about what we know can be done to infer depth info.
Remember, you can hate the diggers who submit (and digg) crap, the GNAA trolls & Adolf Hitroll but only as much as you hate your freedom to submit, digg and post yourself.
Freedom is not a binary concept
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=zfs+linuxr y/l-inotify.html?ca=dgr-lnxw51Inotify
I thought I had read dtrace was on linux too, but what I had really read was Inotify replacing Dnotify on Linux.
http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/libra
How hard would it be to port these things to Linux?
Is it something like depth perception. They keep telling me you need two eyes for depth perception, but I close one eye and I can perceive depth perhaps even better. It's like a hologram. It may even be holographic. In making a hologram, you only need one film.
Is why there's a front of an animal at all. Why do animals not have sensory organs distributed to all sides equally to prevent attack from any given direction, or at least an even distribution of each.
There's also the question of distribution from top to bottom.
Double good job appointing someone who's expectation of civil rights has been lowered, and then spinning it as if it will help him do his job. Just about anything from his perspective would be an improvement, and as you know, these days, an improvement is a job well done.
you wind up with these regions where the browser displays the error message "unable to contact host"
The stadium is art, what happens in it is sport.
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Cosmology+of+kyo to%22+ebert
...but continuing with the theme, their development in men is primitive.
Having a feature makes you more primitive than not having a feature?
Wow! The final proof that men are more primitive than women!
I had this idea where calculations running at one frequency and calculations running at a non-interfering frequency could be run over the same chip substrate, maybe even more than two frequencies.