Slashdot Mirror


Sun's Scott McNealy's Days are Numbered?

alek writes "The Wall Street Journal writes 'Dusk could be near for Sun's McNealy' where they conjecture that the founder and and CEO of Sun Microsystems might be leaving soon. They suggest that the return of former CFO Michael Lehman and and a more active Board pressing for improved performance could result in COO Jonathan Schwartz taking over the top job. We've heard stories like this for years but Scott has hung in there for a long time - his response to the WSJ was 'That rumor is about 22 years old and still chuggin.'"

104 comments

  1. Well done! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No more hockey, welcome back PowerPoint!

  2. Sun's days Are Numbered by gasmonso · · Score: 1

    One has to wonder if Sun is ripe for a takeover by the likes of Google. There is alot of speculation on this and it kinda makes sense. What's Sun's bread and butter these days?

    http:religiousfreaks.com
    1. Re:Sun's days Are Numbered by cpatil · · Score: 1

      Are you nuts ? Except the fact that Dr Eric Schmidt worked for Sun, their is no synergy in both the companies merging.

    2. Re:Sun's days Are Numbered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One has to wonder if Sun is ripe for a takeover by the likes of Google. There is alot of speculation on this and it kinda makes sense. What's Sun's bread and butter these days?

      Their lavender/purple/white color scheme.

    3. Re:Sun's days Are Numbered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      I think that speculation actually started on slashdot a few years back in this thread. Kleiner Perkins companies have long been known to buy each other out to save each other -- even long after they went public (consider Netscape/AOL) - and Google's seed money did come from a Sun founder (Bechtolsheim).


      People always talk of Microsoft vs Google or MSFT vs Sun or MSFT vs Netscape for MSFT vs AOL - but they rarely realize that it's always been Microsoft vs Kleiner Perkins Caufield and Byers where all these companies (Sun, Electronic Arts, AOL, Google, Netscape) are all at heart part of KPCB's portfolio and act more similarily to divisions of microsoft than separate entities.

    4. Re:Sun's days Are Numbered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Macromedia is also a Kleiner company - so you can add that to the "it's not Macromedia vs (whatever Vista's Flash competitor will be)".


      As is Lotus (anyone remember Notes) - so this Kliener vs Microsoft battle's been going on since before much of the Google team even touched a computer.

    5. Re:Sun's days Are Numbered by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 1
      One has to wonder if Sun is ripe for a takeover by the likes of Google. There is alot of speculation on this and it kinda makes sense. What's Sun's bread and butter these days?


      I would hope Google would complete their acquisition of Disney before we start speculating about Sun. One at a time folks, one at a time.

    6. Re:Sun's days Are Numbered by LordOfTheNoobs · · Score: 1

      I thought PIXAR aquired Disney...

      --
      They're there affecting their effect.
    7. Re:Sun's days Are Numbered by slowbad · · Score: 2, Funny
      Sun's days are numbered? So start counting, with today as 1 and tomorrow #2.

      Scott McNealy's days at Sun are numbered 8001 with tomorrow being #8002.

    8. Re:Sun's days Are Numbered by TTL0 · · Score: 1

      well if Oracle is shopping, Sun makes a better choice then Ubuntu

      --
      Sanity is the trademark of a weak mind. -- Mark Harrold
    9. Re:Sun's days Are Numbered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      B&B is hardware - at least per one of their guys a LinuxWolrd

  3. McNealy, Ballmer, or Ellison by tallsails · · Score: 1

    You have to pick one if you are a developer.... who do you think knows where the industry is headed, and who thinks they ARE the industry? http://blog.tallsails.com/2006/04/18/who-are-you-g onna-bet-on.aspx

    1. Re:McNealy, Ballmer, or Ellison by big+dumb+dog · · Score: 1

      I'd pick Ellison. He's a psycho, but I think he know where things are moving.

      --
      "Seven years of college down the drain. Might as well join the f-ing Peace Corps." - John 'Bluto' Blutarsky
  4. Why not? by wlan0 · · Score: 1

    Hey, then can just hire Darl McBride and sue BSD!

  5. Sun makes great hardware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Too bad they can't seem to fully adopt/develop Linux/FOSS software on their hardware instead of flogging Solaris.

    Don't get me wrong, Sun has given a lot to OSS but they really need to stop sucking that dry Solaris tit while they slowly starve to death. It looks kinda funny when there is a full Linux teat right next to them and they wont fully embrace it.

    1. Re:Sun makes great hardware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Open source and financial performance don't usually go hand in hand...

    2. Re:Sun makes great hardware... by prefect42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, remember SGI just recently shifted to Linux...

      --

      jh

    3. Re:Sun makes great hardware... by jadavis · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I suggest you actually look at Solaris. There are some amazing capabilities in there way ahead of Linux.

      ZFS is a filesystem that can do raid5-like storage or mirrors. Filesystems can share a common storage pool. You can make snapshots instantly, and at any time you want you can roll back to that snapshot (transactions). Everything about it is very cool, check it out.

      DTrace is also amazing. You can observe almost anything about a running program with negligable performance impact. It will break the information down for you statistically so you can tell that, for example, 1% of the time a given function call takes 1000 times longer than average.

      It's also got containers and zones, and a service manager.

      I have been using Linux and FreeBSD for a long time. I am just getting interested in Solaris, and I am very impressed.

      --
      Social scientists are inspired by theories; scientists are humbled by facts.
    4. Re:Sun makes great hardware... by htd2 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sun are unlikely to drop Solaris, it is and for the most part always has been their crown jewels.

      It would be difficult to find a OS that on a capability by capability approaches Solaris as a server platform. dtrace, SMF, zones, fireengine, great scalability, good enough HCL.

      However I can understand a Linux advocate wanting Sun to drop Solaris, it is the closest and best competitor to Linux.

      A large number of big commercial companies that were early adopters of Linux are now looking long and hard at Solaris x86. Its fast, cheaper than Linux, OpenSource if they want to tick that box and it runs on pretty much all the hardware that they deployed Linux on.

      Some have jumped allready.

    5. Re:Sun makes great hardware... by mrhandstand · · Score: 1

      Um - how is it cheaper than linux? Not trolling - just not sure what you meant?

      --
      Always value the individual over the system. --Bruce Lee "I don't need a Sig - I have a custom 191" - me
    6. Re:Sun makes great hardware... by diegocgteleline.es · · Score: 1

      Sun makes great hardware

      Yes, their home-made opteron CPUs are a great example of how Sun does hardware....

      Sun has given a lot to OSS but they really need to stop sucking that dry Solaris tit while they slowly starve to death. It looks kinda funny when there is a full Linux teat right next to them and they wont fully embrace it.

      Solaris is opensource now, and the license is quite reasonable. There's many people playing with opensolaris now that it has been opensourced. Hell, if it wasn't because i'm on dialup, I'd download and install it next to my linux partition, you even have kde/gnome available and drivers from nvidia.

    7. Re:Sun makes great hardware... by skinnygmg · · Score: 1

      Solaris 10 licenses are free for systems purchased from Sun and Sun authorized resellers http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/licensing/over view.xml

    8. Re:Sun makes great hardware... by JPriest · · Score: 2, Informative
      People tend to think Linux is free like beer for the Enterprize market also, but in reality it is hardly feee. Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS starts at $1499.

      But to play devils advocate for a bit, the free like beer "download editions" for most Linux distros have left a larger market of Linux admins to hire from. We are a mixed shop but most of the "new" guys into out Linux/UNIX deparment tend to prefer Linux becasue that is what they know. Everytime we lose an old Solaris guy, we get a new Linux guy. I don't think the days ahead are going to get any easier for Sun.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    9. Re:Sun makes great hardware... by thanasakis · · Score: 1

      One thing that's interesting about zfs is that it handles mirroring at the logical level and not at the physical level. In traditional approaches the filesystem module in the kernel sees a raid metadevice which is handled exactly like a physical device, eg. using the /dev/dsk/... and /dev/rdsk/... devices. The folks behind zfs figured that since we are talking about software based raid, there is no reason why the filesystem shouldn't know a little more about what's lies beneath. So, the mirroring for example is done at the block level. Each block has a checksum so it is possible to detect malfunctions between two mirrors of the same instance. Especially for filesystems that have relatively low usage, this method is megafast because it actually mirrors only the contents of the filesystem (a conventional raid would go ahead and mirror the entire physical disk bit by bit).

    10. Re:Sun makes great hardware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm a linux biggot but I was going to say it the other way.


      Have you used an UltraSparc T1? This is their best newest chip and it's a dog at normal tasks, you have to very very carefully craft the work load for it to perform at an interesting level and even then the performance is all throughput based, the actual job latency blows.


      I'd say they should hop in to bed with IBM on the hardware front and get some modern hardware under their platform and they'd have an interesting thing going. Their software platform is becoming more interesting.

    11. Re:Sun makes great hardware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Sorry, but Solaris tit is full of yummy highly-optimized formula. And we've grown quite strong on that milk. And BTW, Solaris is now developing at a much faster rate than Linux.

      If you'd also like some of that milk superformula, you can find it at opensolaris.org. Especially where it says "putback logs" -- that's the milk glands.

    12. Re:Sun makes great hardware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yes, their home-made opteron CPUs are a great example of how Sun does hardware....


      Nice attempt at a flame.. for a third grade kid.

      Like >90% of Slashdot you apparently haven't worked on enterprise level hardware. Now drop the Gentoo laptop, climb up the stairs out of mommy's basement, and get a McJob.
    13. Re:Sun makes great hardware... by jadavis · · Score: 1

      Especially for filesystems that have relatively low usage, this method is megafast because it actually mirrors only the contents of the filesystem

      Not only that, but due to zfs's design, if there is a power failure the raid does not need to be resync'd, nor does it need any kind of nvram. It really removes a lot of the headaches of raid.

      --
      Social scientists are inspired by theories; scientists are humbled by facts.
    14. Re:Sun makes great hardware... by jadavis · · Score: 1

      Yes, their home-made opteron CPUs are a great example of how Sun does hardware....

      Sun has some interesting technology in their UltraSPARC T1 processor. 32 threads of simultaneous execution and only 72 watts.

      --
      Social scientists are inspired by theories; scientists are humbled by facts.
    15. Re:Sun makes great hardware... by htd2 · · Score: 1

      Solaris 10 is available for Sun for free download you can use it for anything the only stipulation is that you have to pay for support.

      This is actually more leniant than RedHat for example where you cannot use RedHat without a support contract and instead you have to rely on using Fedora.

      If you do require full support as you would if you ran RedHat Enterprise Linux then you obviously pay Sun and Sun charges less per system than RedHat for what they argue is better support.

      So if you are a large organisation deploying Solaris x86 you can use Solaris 10 for free on your development and test boxes and only pay Sun for support on the production environment, and there you pay less than you did for RedHat. If as in some environments half of your servers are dev/test systems then this can equate to a very large saving.

    16. Re:Sun makes great hardware... by diegocgteleline.es · · Score: 1

      Like >90% of Slashdot you apparently haven't worked on enterprise level hardware.

      Like many pro-sun enterprise people you don't seem to realize that the low and middle-end sun servers are all based on AMD CPUs. When they started the move, they didn't even had a 64-bit version of solaris for those CPUs - pretty sucky for a company that had been doing 64-bit computing for nearly a decade. Not a good example of high-quality enterprise hardware, if you ask me

    17. Re:Sun makes great hardware... by sjm_sd · · Score: 1

      > Especially for filesystems that have relatively low usage, this method is
      > megafast because it actually mirrors only the contents of the filesystem (a
      > conventional raid would go ahead and mirror the entire physical disk bit by
      > bit).

      Pardon? And that would matter how? You not got a volume manager? Not many low use filesystems if you got one.

  6. The Sun always shine on TV. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Sun always shine on TV.

  7. Chug chug chug by BumpyCarrot · · Score: 0
    That rumor is about 22 years old and still chuggin.

    Dude, Sun has the hugest beer bong in the world!

    --
    Do you see what I did there?
  8. McNealy is selling, what is this telling? by digitaldc · · Score: 2, Informative

    INSIDER & RULE 144 TRANSACTIONS REPORTED - LAST TWO YEARS
    Date Insider Shares Type Transaction Value*

    17-Feb-06 MCNEALY, SCOTT G.
    Chairman 2,400,000 Direct Option Exercise at $3.125 per share. $7,500,000
    17-Feb-06 MCNEALY, SCOTT G.
    Chairman 2,400,000 Direct Sale at $4.30 - $4.37 per share. $10,404,0002
    17-Feb-06 MCNEALY, SCOTT G.
    Chief Executive Officer 2,400,000 Direct Planned Sale $10,344,0001


    Get out while the gettin's good, take the money and run.

    Sun is trading at $5 a share, time to buy? or forgeddaboudit!?

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:McNealy is selling, what is this telling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      forgeddaboudit.

      Since the era of big iron is basically over, Sun micro is searching for a new niche to fill. Linux/BSD running on low cost intel/amd hardware in cluster formats is the current preferred method.

      Interestingly enough, I have not understood why Sun has not tried to retool their concept. For example, they could have servers that when you connect more together (ie. Hybrid Mosix), they automatically cluster and load balance traffic/cpu/memory throughout the nodes. To a company this is ideal, because all they would need to do when they want to scale is to add another server or two with no config changes. To the developer, it would be very cool as well...

      Concepts like the above is what Sun desperately needs right now....

    2. Re:McNealy is selling, what is this telling? by DustyShadow · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nothing looks shady to me about that. All he did was sell 2,400,000 shares and then rebuy that same amount at his option price. Happens all the time. Check out almost any company and you will see the same thing happening on a regular basis.

    3. Re:McNealy is selling, what is this telling? by zovat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All it is saying is that he is exercising is option and getting a little extra cash....
      Time to buy I think -
      SUN have always had their critics - they did well in the dotcom boom, and everyone said that they chose the wrong model before it kicked off.
      They have new servers, new chips and an impressive roadmap - I think they have turned a corner.

    4. Re:McNealy is selling, what is this telling? by drix · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sun is trading at $5 a share, time to buy? or forgeddaboudit!?

      Now's the time to decide--earnings call is on Monday. There are some credible rumors floating around that this will be the first profitable quarter in years. Sun's really revamped their product line in the last 16 months (AMD, Niagara, etc.) and in their last 10-K they mentioned they were actually having a hard time meeting demand. (Apropos the original story, there's also speculation that this would be an ideal note for McNealy to end his career on.)

      If they do end up back in the black, every analyst and his brother will be on CNBC Tuesday morning shouting "Turned the corner!" and I think it would cause some major institutional buyers to jump back in. Unlike the run-up last month which got subsequently iced due to profit taking, the big guys would be in it for the long haul, creating a new support. $5.50 or maybe even $6? I haven't done the math.

      And I feel like this possiblity hasn't been fully capitalized in to the current price--I'm really surprised how little talk there is about SUNW on the boards, newswires, or the Street. A lot of people seem to have written it off as a sad relic of the dot-com era. I think they're missing out on two key points: 1) how revolutionary and unique these new UltraSparc T1s are, especially for those serving up huge amounts of online content (ie everyone) or who are worried about energy costs (ie everyone), and 2) how much brand equity "Sun Microsystems" carries among a whole generation of 25+ year old geeks who grew up worshipping that awesome UltraSparc workstation in the server room/lab/etc (like everyone at Google, for one.)

      To the extent that it's even possible nowadays, I feel like SUNW has been slipping under the radar for the last couple months.

      P.S. I am quite obviously long on this stock, so if course it's in my best interest to convince you of all this :-)

      --

      I think there is a world market for maybe five personal web logs.
    5. Re:McNealy is selling, what is this telling? by Znork · · Score: 2, Interesting

      'how much brand equity "Sun Microsystems" carries among a whole generation of 25+ year old geeks'

      Unfortunately, most of that brand equity has been eaten away by half a decade during which you'd rather be compiling on your desktop than on the server, and trying to answer embarrasing questions why the devs get better performance out of their java code on their laptop than on the expensive app server.

      You know, five years ago those 25+ yearers would form a queue when machines got decommissioned and handed out. These days you'd have to pay people to take them.

    6. Re:McNealy is selling, what is this telling? by drix · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm definitely not contending that Sun's big iron is how it's going to bail itself out. Quite the opposite--my whole point was they're migrating their whole business model away from big fancy app servers and towards cheapo Opteron / Niagara clustered solutions. Of course, that's cheapo in the Sun sense: their prices are still 50-200% higher than comparable anonymous white box hardware. And, as we all know, it was precisely the rise of the white box cluster that brought Sun to the point it's at now. So what gives? Well, it turns out TCO for Sun hardware is actually lower even factoring in the higher hardware cost. Read it for yourself. It's a hard thing to wrap your mind around, especially if you've been hanging around /. for years like I have.

      But apparently it's true. And that was my point about brand equity. A lot of the people who are now making purchasing decisions for their firm have a deep-seated belief that Sun makes more stable, more efficient, just overall better products that are worth paying a premium for. You can recognize these people because they also buy Apple for personal use.

      My, I really sound like I've drink the Kool-Aid. I guess only time will tell. I don't actually have that much $$ riding on this stock, and I wouldn't even call myself one of the Sun fanboys I alluded to in the previous post. A ton of people who are a lot smarter than me got took a pass on this one. So... maybe I'll be getting reamed come Monday! :-)

      --

      I think there is a world market for maybe five personal web logs.
    7. Re:McNealy is selling, what is this telling? by briansmith · · Score: 1

      You said:
      Of course, that's cheapo in the Sun sense: their prices are still 50-200% higher than comparable anonymous white box hardware.

      So what gives? Well, it turns out TCO for Sun hardware is actually lower [sun.com] even factoring in the higher hardware cost.

      The article you cited says:
      For purposes of our analysis, let's assume all servers are of equal cost: Server price: $3,000.00

      whitebox AMD + Solaris: $3,000 + (3 * $120) + (36 * $65.00) = $5,700.00

      Sun AMD + Solaris: $3,000 + (3 * $120) + (36 * $39.00) = $4,764.00

      I say:
      Let's take your estimate that Sun hardware is 50% more expensive than white-box hardware, and re-run the cited calculation:

      Sun AMD + Solaris: (1.5 * $3,000) + (3 * $120) + (36 * $39.00) = $6,264.00

      So, the Sun server's TCO appears to be $564 (~10%) higher than the whitebox server's TCO over three years.

      Also, the blog you linked to was comparing the cost of a single dual-core Sun system to a dual-processor single-core whitebox system. A single dual-core chip is significantly cheaper than two single-core chips. Once that is taken into account, the TCO would be ~15-20% higher, I believe.

      Please correct me if I've made any mistakes.

  9. Oh my. by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 4, Funny


    Replacing McNealy with Schwartz would be like performing a brain transplant in which a poorly functioning brain is replaced with a kidney.

    --
    September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
    1. Re:Oh my. by NatteringNabob · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure why this got modded as funny, at least, not if you would like to see Sun survive as a company. I've met very few people in the industry, and almost none at Sun, that impressed me less than Jonathan Schwartz. Scott screwed up by drinking the koolaid the SPARC guys were selling, but he is a very sharp guy. There isn't much wrong with Sun that making a total sommitment to Solaris and Linux on x86_64 (an dasjusting the cost structure to match) wouldn't solve. The first step would be to actually ship the 8-way Galaxy machines. Getting rid of all the people whose job it is to come up with stupid pricing tricks would be a good start too. Does Sun *really* need 3 different configurations of T2000/T1000 differing only by support contract? I don't think so.

    2. Re:Oh my. by mmkkbb · · Score: 1

      Welcome to Vogon Microsystems! May I take your order?

      --
      -mkb
  10. Whay about Ray? by Serapth · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seriously, Ray Ozzie ( of Lotus fame ) has serious power at Microsoft. He is definatly a man of vision, the question is, do you agree with his vision. My understanding is the work he was doing at Groove was quite impressive, plus Microsoft basically bought groove to get this guy on board.

    Of all the people listed, I would rather have him running the show.

    1. Re:Whay about Ray? by IntlHarvester · · Score: 1

      Ray Ozzie is a genius. Lotus Notes gets a lot of (deserved) flak for the UI, but technologically, this thing was basically the World Wide Web invented 10 years early.

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
    2. Re:Whay about Ray? by tallsails · · Score: 1

      good point. Except he insn't running the show (yet - many articles hint he may soon). I don't know as much about him as the other 3, but here is to hoping I ha ve to learn it...

    3. Re:Whay about Ray? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bill Atkinson/HyperCard. 1987.

    4. Re:Whay about Ray? by IntlHarvester · · Score: 1

      Hypercard was never network aware, and Notes is older anyway.

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
  11. Balmer and Otellini need to go. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Interestingly, ever since Microsoft and Intel brought in people with a business background rather than a tech background, their stocks have sucked.

    Before those too (Balmer & Otelini) both were run by people with a tech background who had the vision to push technology to create new markets. Now they're run by bean-counters who only know how to give speaches and maintain the market against competitors.

    Bring back tech leaders to run tech companies.

  12. Might not be bad, if its true? by gentimjs · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I know he isnt popular with the /. crowd, but Schwartz -IS- popular with the Fortune500 CEO crowd... I've seen the guy work a room, he comes across very charismatically (way WAY more than McNealy ever has) and the dumb PHB/CxO types seem to really take an interest in what he's saying.
    Now, I'm no fanboy of either one, but McNealy is probably better suited to chair thier R&D or something than he is to being CEO these days. Schwartz at least would put a more energetic face on the company and (one could hope) re-vitalize thier core competancies.
    Now, I know im dreaming, but maybe of McNealy got out of the top slot, Sun could/would FINALLY ditch thier 4000% margin policy and start selling crap that I (me personally, or the company I work for) could actually afford to buy!

    1. Re:Might not be bad, if its true? by Viol8 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      "thier 4000% margin policy"

      Quite. I wanted to use Solaris for my small company and looked
      into buying some ultrasparcs. Yeah , right. HOW much just
      for the CPU box WITHOUT monitor, keyboard or mouse and with
      some 5 year out of date graphics card?? Suns marketing dept are still living on Planet 1980s when Unix hardware really could command a serious premium over PCs.
      Not now though , at least not in the low end of the market
      (high end servers are another matter).

    2. Re:Might not be bad, if its true? by gentimjs · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ive talked with Schwartz about this semi-directly (in a webchat of about 15 people), and explained that all the sun (specifically, all the sparc) hardware me and my company own is -all- purchased second hand off of ebay. Servers and desktops. The prices are simply too high. He seemed to understand, and pointed out that from his desk the big challenge was developing a sub-$1000 sparc system to the economy-of-scale where they could make cash from it enough to justify the investment. I can understand this, but I really would like to see them take the concept they started with the SB1500/2500 where they were pc-ish systems that just happened to be sparc. What I'd -really- like to see is a Sparc powered desktop (Fujitsu Sparc64 VI anyone?) with a pci-express subsystem, ddr2 ram, sata, and the capability to take "off the shelf" pc componants (like vid card, and such) .... but I know im dreaming :-(
      Schwartz did seem to get the point that developing a "whitebox" market would be a good thing. I'm wondering what/who has held him back?

    3. Re:Might not be bad, if its true? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Likely David Yen and whoever is on his team advising about SPARC hardware sales. SSG eats quite a bit of the R&D budget and pushes its weight around to make sure that their hardware is given first class status amongst the other divisions. This means that a product that would do well in the commercial Linux marketplace may not make the killing it should because resources have to be diverted to Sun-built, Solaris-only hardware.

    4. Re:Might not be bad, if its true? by kscguru · · Score: 1
      I've seen McNealy talk, but never Schwartz. I was utterly impressed with McNealy's ability to sell out-of-the-box ideas and put together a cohesive picture. Schwartz ... based on his blog, all I've seen is an ability to hype Sun without actually producing deliverables. Schwartz has been running the company for the past few years - anything interesting come out? Oh yeah, Solaris 10 and Opteron servers, both projects started via McNealy before Schwartz took over.

      To an engineer, McNealy is the real deal, and Schwartz is a PHB. Maybe the Fortune500 CEO crowd would like this change, but I expect Sun would lose the last of their engineering talent were Schwartz to take over. They would become just another company cutting quality to make a buck.

      --

      A witty [sig] proves nothing. --Voltaire

    5. Re:Might not be bad, if its true? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... except Schwartz was the head of Software before he was the COO ...

    6. Re:Might not be bad, if its true? by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 1

      "I know he isnt popular with the /. crowd, but Schwartz -IS- popular with the Fortune500 CEO crowd... I've seen the guy work a room, he comes across very charismatically (way WAY more than McNealy ever has) and the dumb PHB/CxO types seem to really take an interest in what he's saying. "

      No surprise - Schwartz spent some time working for one of the big management consulting firms.

      He probably learned how to sell crap to CEOs while he was there. It's what the management consulting firms *do*.

      --
      September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
    7. Re:Might not be bad, if its true? by aphaenogaster · · Score: 1

      I dont know... I was able to play with a brand new 1500 a couple of weeks ago, and let me just tell you how much happier I am now with my old blade 1000 (dual 750sparcIII). My 80 pound sb1k is worth every penny and built like a tank (course I bought it used on ebay for 700 dollars). I am glad that the 1500 is or almost eol, and the new ultra's are cheaper and really nice. I think they are doing the right thing, keep em high quality. Keep em fantastically designed, and I will just ignore they ever built the 1500 series. Dont get me wrong, they were/are better built than any pc I have seen, but they were not up to the quality I expect from Sun. Of course my other sun was an e450 that cost nearly 90,000 dollars back in the bubble. Sun is getting cheaper though. I just bought a system 7 keyboard and mouse for 50 bucks, and the new ultras sans sparc can be downright inexpensive.

  13. Synergy by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

    Sure there is. Sun has been trying to break into Web services -- witness OpenOffice.org, various Java initiatives, grid farm, etc. Google has Web services down, since that's all they do, so such a merger would be beneficial to Sun.

    For Google, the benefits are more dubious. Sure, they get OpenOffice.org, but don't they have Sun talent working on an AJAX OpenOffice.org already? Plus, they have Writely, now. Plus, OpenOffice.org is LGPL, so Google can pretty much do what it wants. OTOH, the OpenOffice.org source code is about as comprehensible as a program written in Brainf*ck or Perl, so maybe that's what it's about for them. ;)

    I don't think Google is at all interested in Sun's hardware business, and, well, why do anything with OpenSolaris when you have so many Linux hackers on staff already?

  14. Money men by FishandChips · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This article is from Wall Street, nb. What it seems to be saying is that a lot of Wall Street brokers would do very nicely out of a share price rise if Mr McNealy stepped down. Well, they would say that wouldn't they? What the article does not mention at all is a credible strategy to secure Sun's future prosperity, if one can be found. Without that, it doesn't matter whether McNealy, Schwartz or for that matter Donald Duck is at the helm.

    Just my 2 cents, but whatever you think of him Scott McNealy is a colourful and entertaining character in an industry of direly grey men. I'd be sorry to see him go, at least until he'd found a new home for Sun as it is hard to see how it can continue on its own for that much longer.

    --
    Las qué passoun
    tournoun pas maï
    1. Re:Money men by IvyKing · · Score: 1
      My take on the Wall Street crowd is that they have a poor understanding of what makes the industry tick and what may be good for Wall Street on the short term is not necessarily good for the customers. Sun's stock performance since the bottom of the market (post bubble) has been better than the blue chips. The stock price is still w-a-y below the peak, but the peak stock was pure bubble.

  15. Google the well known hardware manufacturer? by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    Lets hope you don't work in Wall Street as an advisor!

  16. Has to be said... by UtSupra · · Score: 1

    ... everybody's days are numbered... It would be very cool to have them in alphabetical order...

  17. Well, of course McNealy's days are numbered... by MS-06FZ · · Score: 1

    I mean the man's mortal, like everyone else...

    I mean, he is, right? Can we get confirmation on this?

    --
    ---GEC
    I'm but the humble pupil, seeking to snatch the scratchbuilt pebble from the master's fully articulated hand
  18. Hmmm... by trailerparkcassanova · · Score: 1

    If this is true it would seem the board would like to put Sun up for sale.

  19. As Mel Brooks would put it by Cannelloni · · Score: 1

    "May the Schwartz be with you." God knows Sun needs a helping hand. Maybe they should let Steve Jobs take over the company? Or sell everything to IBM?

    --
    Beauty is in the beholder of the eye.
  20. Seppuku the only responce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wasn't he supposed to fall on his sword after the Sun/Microsoft pact. Was it a coincidence that a lot of commentators came to the exact same conclusion.

    Scott McNealy's reign as chief executive of Sun Microsystems could be coming to an end, say analysts.
    Munir Kotadia April 06 2004

  21. Their management needs a lot of change by MikeRT · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They've been so obsessed with Microsoft that they failed to see that their biggest threat was IBM. Sun could have easily come in and preempted IBM by making the transition to OpenSolaris sooner, heavily supporting Linux in a real way earlier and making a name for itself in open source sooner. Imagine if they'd started 7-8 years ago with supporting PostgreSQL on their systems and actively developing it into something that was a quality part of their software stack (not saying it's a bad DB). How about if they'd done the official port of Java to Linux, instead of making Blackdown do work on it until Linux became too strong to ignore?

    Their leaders are arrogant and resistant to change. That's a bad combination when you're in a competitive field where swallowing your pride and accomodating your users is the most important way of making money.

    1. Re:Their management needs a lot of change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This is something that Sun in general, and McNealy in particular, have been aware of for more than a decade. Bashing Microsoft just gets Sun press cheaply. As in, "the only bad press is not getting any."


      IBM has, since the demise of Digital, always been Sun's biggest competitor.

    2. Re:Their management needs a lot of change by htd2 · · Score: 1

      As an ex Sun employee I can assure you that Sun has always been well aware of the threat that IBM posed. Having being partly responsible for disposing of DEC Sun was always rubbing directly up against IBM after that.

      I agree that Sun could have OpenSourced Solaris earlier, but there where practical difficulties in doing this such as who owned the rights to all the Solaris components etc which meant that it was always going to take a long time.

      Sun clearly misjudged the OpenSource communities obsession with marketing over substance.
      Sun quite rightly regarded itself and still does as one of the mainstays of the OpenSource community, even before OpenSolaris Sun's donations to the OpenSource community dwarfed IBM and all the other players except FSF. What they did not expect was the extent to which the OpenSource community was prepared to swallow other vendors OpenSource marketing campaigns hook line and sinker. One of the best examples of this being the IBM and Sun patent donations.

      IBM were lauded and Sun were flamed, this despite the fact that Sun donated patents which were not due to be renewed and which were related to OS's etc something you could not say for the IBM "donation".

  22. Also available on Linux by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=zfs+linux
    I thought I had read dtrace was on linux too, but what I had really read was Inotify replacing Dnotify on Linux.
    http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/librar y/l-inotify.html?ca=dgr-lnxw51Inotify

    How hard would it be to port these things to Linux?

    1. Re:Also available on Linux by assantisz · · Score: 1

      Did you actually look at the search results of that Google link you gave us? None of it shows that ZFS (as the filesystem developed by Sun) has been ported to Linux.

    2. Re:Also available on Linux by jadavis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is a lot of work going on to make Solaris and Linux work well together. You can use zones to set up linux on a Solaris box, but I'm a little unclear on the details. I'll be checking that out soon though.

      I think the porting of ZFS would be reasonable to do, but I'm sure it would take some work.

      DTrace seems like it would require a LOT of work. All the work of DTrace was not the userspace application, but all of the hooks added into the OS at every level. So basically it would be repeating all the work on Linux rather than merely a port.

      The main thing to take note of is that Sun is actually innovating. There's a lot of actual research being done on the OS kernel itself, which not too many companies are taking seriously. Linux is great, but I don't think it's going to make Solaris obsolete any time soon. There are also some major differences in overall design philosophy.

      --
      Social scientists are inspired by theories; scientists are humbled by facts.
    3. Re:Also available on Linux by thanasakis · · Score: 1

      moderation: -1,Bullshit

      Have you followed the links that you provided?

      Because if you did, you would have noticed that ZFS and Dtrace are actually NOT available for linux and it will probably take considerable time to port such complex mechanisms to it.

    4. Re:Also available on Linux by htd2 · · Score: 1

      There are a number of pale imitations of dtrace available for Linux but none of them gets close to DTrace functionality, safety or performance. Part of the problem is that Dtrace uses a fully instrumented kernel which is one and the same as the production Solaris kernel. Almost all the other DTrace imitators on Linux rely on special Linux kernels and none of them have the safety of DTrace which you can turn on on a production kernel without worrying about performance or kernel panics.

      One reason why Linux cannot deliver the same functionality as DTrace/Solaris is the resistance put up by Trovalds to instumenting the Linux kernel, his view is that dbugging is for wimps, code should be perfect and therefore DTrace type funtionality isn't necessary.

      ZFS isn't available either though it would be simpler to impliment on Linux than DTrace. Zones and Container type functionality does exist for Linux/BSD Zones are like BSD Jails.

  23. McNealy aside, rest of Sun is poorly executing by wsanders · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sun is a shadow of its former self and it doesn't have to do with McNealy, except to the extent that he could make the rounds and "moticate" people. Personally:

    - Tried to call Sun 4 times to get quotes for hardware and support contracts. Did not get hold of a human, phone system made me leave messages each time. No one ever returned my calls.

    - All Sun's patches, and their treasure trove of support information, SunSolve, is behind a paid firewall now, and you need to buy a support contract to get access. See item above. Why not just a support subscription I can charge to my credit card. Zillions of people would probably pay $500 per year for that. I would, gladly.

    - We bought several of the new X4100 boxes. Nicely designed, but serial console management did not work in Solaris 10 (or else required a fistful of undocumented hacks), and the LOM remote console was buggy and crashed a couple of times, requiring a system power cycle. We sent the servers back.

    - It takes me twice as long to build any OSS on Solaris - no one is really developing on it consistently. Ever tried building Firefox on Solaris?

    Basically, this is all execution. It's just easier to buy something other than a Sun. If need a Web server, I can have a Linux host installed and up from CDROM in 15 min, 45 min if I care about building the absolute latest version of Apache or an obscure Apache module.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
    1. Re:McNealy aside, rest of Sun is poorly executing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does appear that you can get a support contract at:

      http://www.sun.com/service/serviceplans/solaris/

      starting at $120/yr and get access to SunSolve, although I'm not sure how quickly it'll be activated.

    2. Re:McNealy aside, rest of Sun is poorly executing by briansmith · · Score: 1

      I am about to evaluate a X4100. Could you please point out how you found the LOM problems so that I can test out my system to make sure it works?

      Also, I am interested in any other issues you had with the X4100.

      Thanks,
      Brian

  24. Hu was that? by dantheman82 · · Score: 1

    I thought Hu rather than Mr. Scott McNealy heard a heckler say, "Your days are numbered." At around the same time, Scott McNealy just read a Chinese fortune cookie saying "according to the sun, your days are numbered." Hu knows why...

    --
    This sig donated to Pater. Long live /.
  25. Scott never gives up by AlexOsadzinski · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I worked for Sun for 7 years, some of that time at VP level, so I got to know Scott, and work with/for him. He taught me an important lesson: never, ever, give up. There were at least two occasions when I was sent out to fight "hopeless" battles for Sun against the arrayed masses of competition. He pushed hard to not give up in the face of impossible odds, and we won.

    He never gives up.

    It's very easy to armchair quarterback what Sun and Scott have been doing this past decade or so. Whenever I find myself wondering why my SUNW shares aren't worth a tenth of what I paid for them, I'm tempted to think of how I could run the company better than Scott. And then I realize that my puny mind can't come up with anything. The company generates cash, employs a lot of people and satisfies a lot of customers. Scott's never been afraid to remake the company (I lived through the transition from technical workstations to commercial servers and that was quite something), but there's only so much that you can do.

    I have no clue what's going on inside the company now but, of one thing I'm sure: if Scott does step aside, it's because he thinks that it's the best thing for the company. He's given everything to it for over 20 years, and could easily have taken the "go lie on a beach" path years and years ago.

    1. Re:Scott never gives up by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 1

      I remember reading an interview in a business mag about 10 years ago, when the Sparcs were lagging everyone and IBM/HP were gaining market share. His comment was along the lines of, "yeah, everyone's waiting at the end of the runway for us, and not because they think we're going to take off." Then they did take off. I'll admit having thought, "well, they're day is done this time", more than once, and each time they come back. If Scott goes, I hope that attitude of fighting on stays.

      And having run both Linux and Solaris in a server environment, here's to figuring out how to push Solarisx86 everywhere. If I ran Opterons, because of the Dev Tools being available, I'd certainly consider running it on a cluster just for the management and profiling tools.

      --
      the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken
    2. Re:Scott never gives up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been with Sun for just over 7 years (and still am, hence the anonymous post). I also found your name on some internal searches, so you do appear to be who you say you are.. :)

      I have no doubt that McNealy cares passionately about the company, and truly believes that what he's doing is the right thing. Unfortunately, the company is just not executing properly. 1) Thanks to SunSigma, we're drowning in procedures; our current attitude seems to be that it doesn't matter if the customer gets screwed as long as the procedure is followed. 2) Our relationship with Linux has been dysfunctional at best. 3) The company memos are a myriad of buzzwords that sound like something out of a Dilbert cartoon. 4) We can't seem to create a quality storage product on our own to save our lives (they've almost all been licensed from other companies). 5) We still - after how many years? - can't produce a quality patch management product. 6) Over the past two years or so we've done complete 180's multiple times on what sort of patches are available to customers without a service contract. 7) Most of our software that involves a gui quite frankly sucks. It never ceases to amaze me how a company that can produce such an awesome OS can't build a decent gui for an app. 8) And let's not forget the E$ fiasco, and then the VP in charge of that got promoted!

      OK, that's enough

    3. Re:Scott never gives up by Savantissimo · · Score: 1

      "Six Sigma" - Say no more - you're doomed.

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
    4. Re:Scott never gives up by AlexOsadzinski · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm who I am :-)

      Your comments ring very true. A lot of them are symptoms of any Very Large Company. But, even back in 1994 when I last worked there, I saw signs of what looked like process for process sake. GE pulled it off, and that company is clearly one of Scott's role models. But Sun's Bay Area culture didn't mesh well with ISO 9000, Six Sigma (or however many sigmas is in fashion these days) and an overlay of process over an essentially anarchic infrastructure.

      Scott used to say that he ran Sun with two wheels off the edge sometimes, because that's what was needed to catch up with much larger competitors. That was fun, albeit a little scary sometimes. I know, from personal interactions with him, that too much process drove him nuts. Once a company gets to Sun's size, though, process becomes a self-sustaining reaction, and it's hard to contain. Too little process is bad, and so is too much. Getting the balance right is almost impossible.

      Your comment about ignoring customers also rings true. If Sun has a systemic weakness, it's a lack of listening skills when it comes to customer interaction. IMHO, it was a huge loss when Ed Zander left, because he's both a marketing genius and someone who....gasp....actually talks WITH, not AT, customers. In my experience, telling customers that they're idiots for buying a competitor's solution is generally a bad idea, and we had a tendency to do that when I was there. Guiding the customer to a better solution is the mark of a great company. Bill Joy used to say (I paraphrase): "When we started the company, if we asked customers what they wanted, they'd have asked for a cheaper, faster VAX. They didn't know the possibilities of a single-user bitmapped workstation with an open O/S." Sun's job was to create more value through showing customers the possibilities of that, and then tailoring the products to customer requirements.

      (Yes, before anyone beats me up about this, there were single-user bitmapped workstations before Sun came along, most notably Apollo's. Sun was the first to evangelize open interfaces, AFAIK).

    5. Re:Scott never gives up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever seen the "de-motivations" poster with a hammer above a board full of bent nails and divots? Tag line - something akin to there's no end to what you can really mess up as long as you keep trying...

      http://www.despair.com/incompetence.html

      Keep trying Scott (not)

    6. Re:Scott never gives up by aphaenogaster · · Score: 1

      Not to be a terrible fanboy but... I have never bought more than some media and just recently a keyboard from sun (directly) and have had wonderful service. I received an email this morning from a human asking me to verify whether my address was business or not, and when I sent in an email to ask about a sunpci card I received a phone call the very next day from a very nice and helpful sales rep. Now you are looking at sales of 30 and 50 dollars. I received far better service from Sun than any other computer company I have bought from. Perhaps they are trying to make sure this old bad service rap changes. In the future I know that when I have my own lab, I will be running all sun and that is partially due to the service I have received on such small and silly things.... That will probably mean 4 blade servers, 2 sparc, 2 amd, 8 sunray 2s, keyboards... ultra 45 for my desk...... mmmmm droooool.....

    7. Re:Scott never gives up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi (I'm the same AC),

      I definitely agree that part of the problems are due to Large Company Syndrome. While there was too much flying by the seat of the pants, and something needed to be done, it unfortunately has swung too far the other direction. I also feel that the people putting together the procedures don't really understand the computer industry (IMO).

      I agree with you big time about losing Zander; definitely huge. I had a chance to meet him several years ago in a small setting. It was around the time when the E$ problem was just getting really big. What impressed me the most was that he "got it". He understood what the problem was and how it was affecting the customers. Here was a senior executive not hiding behind "we're evaluating all of our options....." or other such non-speak and really getting into the nuts and bolts of the problem.

      Thanks for the Bill Joy anecdote. It's nice to hear things like this from the past. :)

    8. Re:Scott never gives up by briansmith · · Score: 1

      What is E$?

    9. Re:Scott never gives up by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      "E4"

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    10. Re:Scott never gives up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's shorthand for E-cache aka L2-cache aka L2SRAM. IOW, the level 2 cache on the cpu module.

      Starting in 1999 or so, Sun's Ultra Sparc II servers had problems where they would encounter parity errors in the level 2 cache, which would then crash the system (technically it was an OS panic). It was very embarassing for Sun, and it took them quite a while to fix it.

    11. Re:Scott never gives up by retiarius · · Score: 1

      E$ is shorthand for the infamous server ecache problem,
      which cost sun dozens of millions to nail down.

                http://www.sunmanagers.org/pipermail/summaries/200 2-April/001431.html

      wherein sun didn't read the fine print on the specs for some alpha-particle-susceptible
      memory from IBM...

  26. Re:McNealy? by continuouslife · · Score: 0

    That was Peter McNeely, but I think Scott McNealy could take Tyson.

    --
    Here's my witty comment about a signature. Ha. Ha.
  27. Look at them!!! Take a look!!! by lonesometrainer · · Score: 1

    microsoft.com

    These aren't two business people finishing a deal! These are comrades, even more THAT'S LOVE! Look at their eyes, how they look at each other, the smiles in their faces, incredible. There's hope for mankind, we're still able to really, really love each other.

    Replacing Scotty would - of course - destroy this enormous love...

    Oh my..., all these feelings...

  28. ZFS needs to really be released first by puppetluva · · Score: 1

    Until ZFS is released for the real production version of Solaris (Not Solaris Express), then a lot of people will spend some real time with it.

    Otherwise. . . it is just a piece of software with lots of promises with no real release.

    1. Re:ZFS needs to really be released first by jadavis · · Score: 1

      Working code is a lot more than "lots of promises"

      --
      Social scientists are inspired by theories; scientists are humbled by facts.
  29. How about that by wsanders · · Score: 1

    Either the program is new, or none of the people I've talked to have known about it. Thanks for the link.

    You'd think they'd put a links allover their web site to rope in all the legacy Sunsolve users and the people downloading free Solairs 10.

    I know Sun's trying; with my past connection to them and Silicon Valley, it's physically painful to watch.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  30. Re:McNealy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe at a Toastmasters competition, but not in the ring!

  31. Popular retirement candidates by The+OPTiCIAN · · Score: 1

    John Howard has spent all but two years of his ten years as PM of Australia having to deal with speculation on when he'll retire - it's an open joke. WRT McNealy similar rumours have passed around for years and years and years also and it's even more stupid for him because he's so much younger.

    In the article it says "Mr. Stahlman wrote a research note about the possibility of a management change in early March." If I were him, I wouldn't be boasting about it.

    "Dusk could be near". That's news with confidence.

    --


    Believe with me, my saplings.
  32. Re:Your sig by mmkkbb · · Score: 1

    Are you still looking for Cocoa wannabes? I work in Cambridge where it appears you are located.

    --
    -mkb
  33. It's official - Scott to step down as CEO by iggymanz · · Score: 1
  34. 4100 issues by wsanders · · Score: 1

    The LOM just randomly hung. I would suggest just pounding it I guess. Try connecting from different marginally compatible browsers like older Mozillas. Use the virtual console applet heavily.

    The other issues were that we just could not get consistent serial port access all the way through the boot process. The documentation was either nonexistent of inconsistent (like, it said to supply the /devices path for the serial port as a kernel parameter, but never said what those values were except that it was "hardware dependent")

    Also the move to GRUB required that we make major reworks to our finely honed Jumpstart architecture. It was just cheaper and quicker to order OpenBoot SPARC boxes than do that.

    I documented all this stuff is several postings to Sun's old support forums, and then about two weeks later they deleted the support forums when they performed a major update to their web site. A typical f***-up.

    They are nice hardware, if you have an established Linux or Windows netinstall infrastructrue I am sure they work OK. We could see our Windows net install server on the 4100s.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"