As well you should. The day that children's cartoons don't contain anything worthy of quoting is the day we raise dumb kids. This has already happened quite a bit, but I haven't found the Gundam series I have watched to blame.
I meant to start the copy after the sentence fragment that got included that referenced Gundams. Slashdot needs to fix its Unicode support. (among other things)
To clarify, the alternative definition being the one in the world where many/most know the law somewhat.
But to the point of this addendum: I have long stopped caring and have conceded that I am a criminal. In the reality we find ourselves in, in order to be free, I believe that it is necessary to be a criminal. I also find it helps to be aware of that situation. I don't know how to rectify it.
That makes me think that maybe lawless meant something different when (if?) there was a time when many/most people knew much about law. Under the definition as I understand it not being lawless merely means that people try not to break whatever laws that may exist. Under that alternative definition, it seems the world is largely lawless at the moment. What comes of that...
For the fact that Constitutional law isn't taught in America K-12? Either you are not an American or are way out of touch with reality. American schools barely touch on matters of law.
were born that surpassed even my idealsâ"the gundam pilots. Tradition appears blurred alongside their true feelings. From a historical point of view, warriors who have lost what they were protecting and were further betrayed by those they were protecting are losers. But they do not recognize themselves as such. Not only that, but they retain a strong will to continue fighting. The emotions of those who were thought to be beautiful are always full of sorrow, and honored tradition disappears in the cry of the weak. Winners of a battle will eventually decline in power and become losers, and then those âlosersâ(TM) will cultivate a new leader.
Was that Jedi guy who said "Only Siths deal in absolutes" a Sith. Maybe we're all Siths. Just saying. You put a comment in the title. I guess that makes you a bundle of sticks. Just saying.
I'm not sure I want anyone handing you a hammer so you can speak from more experience on what a hammer can smash, but personally, I like smashing walnuts and pecans with hammers.
Slashdot Mirror
Well, it's not like we are the old lady who swallowed a horse.
You say all that like it matters on a site where people just write whatever to pass/kill/waste time.
As well you should. The day that children's cartoons don't contain anything worthy of quoting is the day we raise dumb kids. This has already happened quite a bit, but I haven't found the Gundam series I have watched to blame.
So, what? So has everyone else. The law doesn't mean anything anymore.
Well if they stop, it will be more assuredly 8 instead of 4.
I meant to start the copy after the sentence fragment that got included that referenced Gundams. Slashdot needs to fix its Unicode support. (among other things)
Last I heard America took him for awhile then threw him back. https://www.bing.com/search?q=...
To clarify, the alternative definition being the one in the world where many/most know the law somewhat.
But to the point of this addendum: I have long stopped caring and have conceded that I am a criminal. In the reality we find ourselves in, in order to be free, I believe that it is necessary to be a criminal. I also find it helps to be aware of that situation. I don't know how to rectify it.
That makes me think that maybe lawless meant something different when (if?) there was a time when many/most people knew much about law. Under the definition as I understand it not being lawless merely means that people try not to break whatever laws that may exist. Under that alternative definition, it seems the world is largely lawless at the moment. What comes of that...
It's a drug called "Gundam Wing": http://www.oocities.org/televi...
But you ask it like someone who isn't interested in finding out the answer.
What does it matter if they genetically engineer themselves out of existence?
He's moved on to talking about doing something similar to humans. Introducing any other elements at that point is neither here nor there.
I actually don't know a Richard to ask to borrow a bucket to choke on... for that matter, I'm not too set on this whole getting choked plan.
while I attempt to choke on him.
http://www.imdb.com/find?ref_=...
For the fact that Constitutional law isn't taught in America K-12? Either you are not an American or are way out of touch with reality. American schools barely touch on matters of law.
were born that surpassed even my idealsâ"the gundam pilots. Tradition appears blurred alongside their true feelings. From a historical point of view, warriors who have lost what they were protecting and were further betrayed by those they were protecting are losers. But they do not recognize themselves as such. Not only that, but they retain a strong will to continue fighting. The emotions of those who were thought to be beautiful are always full of sorrow, and honored tradition disappears in the cry of the weak. Winners of a battle will eventually decline in power and become losers, and then those âlosersâ(TM) will cultivate a new leader.
Never been there. That's an odd place to take the conversation. Maybe something that should be taught in K-12 in America but isn't.
How charming.
Was that Jedi guy who said "Only Siths deal in absolutes" a Sith. Maybe we're all Siths. Just saying. You put a comment in the title. I guess that makes you a bundle of sticks. Just saying.
Just saying. On that matter, however, what else did you eat/consume. Cherrypicking data points gets us nowhere on diagnosing the problem.
I'm not sure I want anyone handing you a hammer so you can speak from more experience on what a hammer can smash, but personally, I like smashing walnuts and pecans with hammers.
I don't know, considering the characteristics of the fictional character billed "The Greatest American Hero".
Under the Constitution only books have rights... or imaginary creatures or something-something... Rats!
Considering the ends of "things", breaking things sounds good.