Because the reason the opinions matter in the first place is because it is the people matter, not the built-in limitations of the choices they've been given. By the logic as currently expressed, once the representative has been chosen, the people are no longer voting, and the preferences being expressed are no longer of the people and your original expression that the "your own" is of the People of Wyoming does not make sense. Two degrees of meaning have been removed from the conventional meaning of "the preferences of the people of Wyoming", first the people who did not vote for a representative, then the people who did vote for a representative, because then it is the preferences of the representative and not the people.
Only problem is, what he wrote was in response to what he thought you wrotes, and more to the point he said some. Long story short, people are sloppy and he didn't appear to mean to refer to that particular example.
Forgetfulness is not necessarily closed-minded, but I have a sentiment similar to yours in that what happens here does not just affect this country and that people taking interest in the elections of other countries shouldn't be called meddling, but a reasonable looking after interests. So when Obama contributes to an Israeli campaign, I don't talk of interference, but if doing so was really in US interests, and whatever Russia did or did not do isn't meddling, though the question of legality is there, but then breaking the law is not necessarily wrong.
President Col. Sanders, beloved mascot of KFC passes an ordinary bill mandating the purchase of KFC chicken once a week. People will rejoice at this yet another natural outcome of the amendment passed during the Trump administration that relinquished the vote of the common people to the companies that are responsible for them.
There being agreements that Palestinians not seek unilateral recognition of a Palestinian state is something that neither of them should have agreed to. This has recently come to my attention. That's not how achieving nationhood should work.
forced the native population out of their homes with force.
Er, what supposedly went down anything like that. I haven't heard anything remotely like people being forced out of their homes. And you do realize you redundantly said force twice. Idiot.
There's a big difference between something that is alarming vs. probematic. Just because it isn't alarming doesn't mean they are wasting their time figuring out how to get things back in working order. In fact, one of the reasons it is not alarming is because the can do something to get things back in working order. You're like that guy who said Ray Kurzweil was afraid of death because he is interested in finding ways to avoid the unpleasant thing. I don't like lots of things; doesn't mean I am afraid of them. I do things to fix situations; doesn't mean they are alarming. Or are you alarmed every time something fails and you have to turn it off and back on again?
"Alarm" equates to panic. It is not a waste of time to attempt to set people straight when they use a term inappropriately. I may disagree with C. S. Lewis that the proper term for a waterfall is sublime as opposed to beautiful, but he does have a point. https://www.bing.com/search?q=...
Hey, if you aren't doing something you enjoy, it's all on you, not the rich. Now my health problems are my greatest barrier, but in some sense, that's still me.
Your post lacks appropriate caveats, but is generally on the mark. The AI will be great for those who aren't stingy with their data now and from now on. The people who view losing their privacy as the biggest threat will like the foolish virgins of parable be shut out in the cold. Face it, information is the new lamp oil of the current era.
Excuse me, is this the forum for Portal humor? The cake is a lie. All the scientists are Aperture Science cores. https://youtube.com/results?q=... the cores
Slashdot Mirror
Finally someone who will get at the history of the region instead of offering up nonsense statistics.
Because the reason the opinions matter in the first place is because it is the people matter, not the built-in limitations of the choices they've been given. By the logic as currently expressed, once the representative has been chosen, the people are no longer voting, and the preferences being expressed are no longer of the people and your original expression that the "your own" is of the People of Wyoming does not make sense. Two degrees of meaning have been removed from the conventional meaning of "the preferences of the people of Wyoming", first the people who did not vote for a representative, then the people who did vote for a representative, because then it is the preferences of the representative and not the people.
Sure it starts with this device naming itself after the movie robot, but the name is so cool that everyone will be doing it. R2D2 is the new 'Smurf'.
Until you discover you've locked yourself out of all your stuff.
I prefer the term sloppy in this case,an I don't think that makes me unreasonable.
Only problem is, what he wrote was in response to what he thought you wrotes, and more to the point he said some. Long story short, people are sloppy and he didn't appear to mean to refer to that particular example.
They may not count, but that is not the same as without significance.
Forgetfulness is not necessarily closed-minded, but I have a sentiment similar to yours in that what happens here does not just affect this country and that people taking interest in the elections of other countries shouldn't be called meddling, but a reasonable looking after interests. So when Obama contributes to an Israeli campaign, I don't talk of interference, but if doing so was really in US interests, and whatever Russia did or did not do isn't meddling, though the question of legality is there, but then breaking the law is not necessarily wrong.
Because voter turnout is so high?
President Col. Sanders, beloved mascot of KFC passes an ordinary bill mandating the purchase of KFC chicken once a week. People will rejoice at this yet another natural outcome of the amendment passed during the Trump administration that relinquished the vote of the common people to the companies that are responsible for them.
There being agreements that Palestinians not seek unilateral recognition of a Palestinian state is something that neither of them should have agreed to. This has recently come to my attention. That's not how achieving nationhood should work.
Seems like you've been misinformed: https://www.bing.com/search?q=...
Citation needed.
Er, what supposedly went down anything like that. I haven't heard anything remotely like people being forced out of their homes. And you do realize you redundantly said force twice. Idiot.
So that makes you the idiot.
There is zero indication that anyone considering themselves "Palestinians" lived there. So if you want to play that game...
That comes nowhere near reflecting everything that went on and you know it.
There's a big difference between something that is alarming vs. probematic. Just because it isn't alarming doesn't mean they are wasting their time figuring out how to get things back in working order. In fact, one of the reasons it is not alarming is because the can do something to get things back in working order. You're like that guy who said Ray Kurzweil was afraid of death because he is interested in finding ways to avoid the unpleasant thing. I don't like lots of things; doesn't mean I am afraid of them. I do things to fix situations; doesn't mean they are alarming. Or are you alarmed every time something fails and you have to turn it off and back on again?
"Alarm" equates to panic. It is not a waste of time to attempt to set people straight when they use a term inappropriately. I may disagree with C. S. Lewis that the proper term for a waterfall is sublime as opposed to beautiful, but he does have a point. https://www.bing.com/search?q=...
The Palestinians are the Nazis then.
Oh yeah? Well, I refuse to deal with such piddling small change, which is why many are under the mistaken impression I am poor.
Everyone knows they were modeled on depictions of demons having pointed ears.
Hey, if you aren't doing something you enjoy, it's all on you, not the rich. Now my health problems are my greatest barrier, but in some sense, that's still me.
Lawnmower man, is that you?
Your post lacks appropriate caveats, but is generally on the mark. The AI will be great for those who aren't stingy with their data now and from now on. The people who view losing their privacy as the biggest threat will like the foolish virgins of parable be shut out in the cold. Face it, information is the new lamp oil of the current era.
Excuse me, is this the forum for Portal humor? The cake is a lie. All the scientists are Aperture Science cores. https://youtube.com/results?q=... the cores