So basically just a reset across the board, and not a scrub of just facts the administration doesn't like. Determining on how you like to interpret this it could be terrible, no problem at all, or something that could be either way and we should still wait and see when they make a change that actually matters.
People are acting like the US government has the only facts in existence and a wiping of the public facing data held by that government by order of the head of that government is an attack on fact itself.
Everyone is lying. Just not all about all the same things at all the same time. One of the potentially fun things in life is to find out which ones. Never trust a person who says they never lie.
I've never given Che Guevara much credit as to what was a reasonable voice. Nor much credit to most people's notion of what's reasonable in general, but that's another matter.
So is language. Unrtst seems to think his quote is sufficient to answer that question in the affirmative. I disagree. Combine that with the fact that people can believe whatever they've been nudged into believing, who knows what the reality is.
Trump has said that you can only trust him for what he is going to do, essentially. It is the media that has been making it out to be that Trump believes that you should come to him or the government for any other facts.
What was the oldest Tweet in existence for that account before the deletion?
But here's an explanation: It is easier to delete everything and then put what you want there back later than to leave that stuff out there with something on it that will make your life more difficult.
Better yet, lets see how well everything can be coded such that we can fit as many of these things in as small a space as possible, while still being capable of actually running things having just one in memory.
Maybe there was, only it wasn't news since someone the media didn't like wasn't in power. Maybe presidents, and indeed political leaders have been doing much the same thing since time immemorial.
I can't drag and drop bookmarks on the Edge bookmark toolbar, a vital part of how I use a browser, so until that happens, Edge is completely unusable for me.
Because everybody knows that QB64 is the most productive language to program in. There's a huge library of code that will compile in it and IBM samples included with DOS will compile with it. Compressed files with IBM DOS and the aforementioned samples are available on the net. https://www.bing.com/search?q=...
I wanted one I didn't get. I forget exactly which two I have, but besides the one in C there is one in C++ and one in Java. If I recall correctly I have the C and Java one. I think I bought the C one myself and added the C++ edition to my Amazon gift wishlist, but my Aunt thought she had a better idea to buy a newer edition. My wishlist now contains only things that it doesn't matter about editions.
Trump does tend to oversimplify so that his followers only think they understand. If the parent post meant to say that Trump is like a child who only thinks he understands, that is not the case, but the former is pretty true.
I want people to not think they understand me when they don't more than I want them to understand me due to the odds involved, so I choose slightly harder to understand constructions. People generally come back with the notion that I am stupid, and that I think my statements are too brilliant for the average mind.
By no means. I think that if the average mind takes an honest stab at what I am trying to convey and asks for clarifications they can readily come to understand what I intend to get conveyed. Very few have gone that route, though.
But anyways the concepts expressed by those people aren't that out of reach and just require some dictionary lookups and Google searches that require reads of still other articles. By this approach the meaning of just about anything becomes substantially clearer.
Whether or not alarming equates exactly to the emotion of panic or some slightly different emotion, the term alarming as used in the article is usually used to refer to emotion. When it refers to an actual alarm, it is get an alarm as you yourself have indicated.
We're talking 1900 here, so if they had any feelings of allegiance to any state at all they thought of themselves as Ottomans, though the wider area seem to align themselves by clans that are led by so-called warlords (that's just the term that English speaking commentators called them, the reports that reach me do a lousy job of what the leaders call themselves). It might be a good idea for a three state plan. The Gaza strip should be one country and the West Bank another. They don't seem to have a sense of allegiance to each other.
Since you have been pretty forthcoming in another post about what you think happened, what is your play by play as to what happened. All I understand is that Israel was attacked and in a matter of weeks won and put in measures to make sure they were never attacked again.
I see no need for Israelis to get off the land before the Palestinians declare they are a state any more than the Tories had to leave the United States or indeed the British forces in general before the United States declared itself independent of Britain. In fact, the legitimacy of the United States' claim to evict the British troops was strengthened by their decision to declare themselves independent.
Slashdot Mirror
So basically just a reset across the board, and not a scrub of just facts the administration doesn't like. Determining on how you like to interpret this it could be terrible, no problem at all, or something that could be either way and we should still wait and see when they make a change that actually matters.
People are acting like the US government has the only facts in existence and a wiping of the public facing data held by that government by order of the head of that government is an attack on fact itself.
Everyone is lying. Just not all about all the same things at all the same time. One of the potentially fun things in life is to find out which ones. Never trust a person who says they never lie.
The article is not to be trusted.
Not one of the words out of Trump's mouth was the word cut. What he said was "We can leave a little bit..." of the EPA agency.
The original order was a memo not made public. We don't know what the original order was.
I've never given Che Guevara much credit as to what was a reasonable voice. Nor much credit to most people's notion of what's reasonable in general, but that's another matter.
So is language. Unrtst seems to think his quote is sufficient to answer that question in the affirmative. I disagree. Combine that with the fact that people can believe whatever they've been nudged into believing, who knows what the reality is.
Trump has said that you can only trust him for what he is going to do, essentially. It is the media that has been making it out to be that Trump believes that you should come to him or the government for any other facts.
So the words out of Trump's mouth was nothing like, "My goal is to eliminate the EPA." Thanks.
What was the oldest Tweet in existence for that account before the deletion?
But here's an explanation: It is easier to delete everything and then put what you want there back later than to leave that stuff out there with something on it that will make your life more difficult.
What I see shaping up is a crowding of the space so that you can't tell who is the reasonable or unreasonable voices.
Better yet, lets see how well everything can be coded such that we can fit as many of these things in as small a space as possible, while still being capable of actually running things having just one in memory.
Yeah, but they were looking for things out of the ordinary, not looking to paint everything GWB had done as out of the ordinary.
Maybe there was, only it wasn't news since someone the media didn't like wasn't in power. Maybe presidents, and indeed political leaders have been doing much the same thing since time immemorial.
...well how about the Windows Subsystem for Linux?
Starts to read Popular Science article... link in article has (Buzzfeed) after it.
I can't drag and drop bookmarks on the Edge bookmark toolbar, a vital part of how I use a browser, so until that happens, Edge is completely unusable for me.
Because everybody knows that QB64 is the most productive language to program in. There's a huge library of code that will compile in it and IBM samples included with DOS will compile with it. Compressed files with IBM DOS and the aforementioned samples are available on the net. https://www.bing.com/search?q=...
I wanted one I didn't get. I forget exactly which two I have, but besides the one in C there is one in C++ and one in Java. If I recall correctly I have the C and Java one. I think I bought the C one myself and added the C++ edition to my Amazon gift wishlist, but my Aunt thought she had a better idea to buy a newer edition. My wishlist now contains only things that it doesn't matter about editions.
Trump does tend to oversimplify so that his followers only think they understand. If the parent post meant to say that Trump is like a child who only thinks he understands, that is not the case, but the former is pretty true.
I want people to not think they understand me when they don't more than I want them to understand me due to the odds involved, so I choose slightly harder to understand constructions. People generally come back with the notion that I am stupid, and that I think my statements are too brilliant for the average mind.
By no means. I think that if the average mind takes an honest stab at what I am trying to convey and asks for clarifications they can readily come to understand what I intend to get conveyed. Very few have gone that route, though.
But anyways the concepts expressed by those people aren't that out of reach and just require some dictionary lookups and Google searches that require reads of still other articles. By this approach the meaning of just about anything becomes substantially clearer.
Whether or not alarming equates exactly to the emotion of panic or some slightly different emotion, the term alarming as used in the article is usually used to refer to emotion. When it refers to an actual alarm, it is get an alarm as you yourself have indicated.
We're talking 1900 here, so if they had any feelings of allegiance to any state at all they thought of themselves as Ottomans, though the wider area seem to align themselves by clans that are led by so-called warlords (that's just the term that English speaking commentators called them, the reports that reach me do a lousy job of what the leaders call themselves). It might be a good idea for a three state plan. The Gaza strip should be one country and the West Bank another. They don't seem to have a sense of allegiance to each other.
Since you have been pretty forthcoming in another post about what you think happened, what is your play by play as to what happened. All I understand is that Israel was attacked and in a matter of weeks won and put in measures to make sure they were never attacked again.
I see no need for Israelis to get off the land before the Palestinians declare they are a state any more than the Tories had to leave the United States or indeed the British forces in general before the United States declared itself independent of Britain. In fact, the legitimacy of the United States' claim to evict the British troops was strengthened by their decision to declare themselves independent.