The price hasn't plummeted because, while the supply is large, the cost of extraction is much higher, owing to its much higher difficulty. It's not as simple as drilling into a big cavern and sucking it out, you know.
Actually, they started calling him a hypocrite, not a socialist. He is a hypocrite because, while he insists he should pay more in tax, he actually does not. Nothing is stopping him making a gift to the treasury in the amount he thinks he ought to be paying, but they have yet to receive any payments.
Bans will not only not prevent them being developed, probably even by a technologically advanced State that is a signatory to the treaty, but it will also not prevent them being used by rogue or puppet states who don't care about bans, or who use them at the behest of a signatory state that is just using them to do their dirty work.
But, but, that would require government getting involved, and the libertarian narrative won't allow that. The free market will dictate that these safeguards exist if they are supposed to exist. Right?
Indeed, nothing any terrorist could do could cause the United States to cease to exist. Mr. Trollheim here is only correct about that point, but is overblowing the threat by several orders of magnitude.
In the face of an existential threat to the United States, her citizens have a proven track record of rising to the cause (WW1, WW2). Of course, there has been no existential threat to the United States since World War 2, except for maybe the Cold War, but that was an existential threat to all of humanity. So, who knows what Americans would do today? If what I see on TV is any indicator how what Americans think about America, it would not surprise me if American Citizens just laid down and allowed an oppressive regime to march right in and take over, for free stuff..
The perfect solution fallacy is an informal fallacy that occurs when an argument assumes that a perfect solution exists and/or that a solution should be rejected because some part of the problem would still exist after it were implemented. This is an example of black and white thinking, in which a person fails to see the complex interplay between multiple component elements of a situation or problem, and as a result, reduces complex problems to a pair of binary extremes.
It is common for arguments which commit this fallacy to omit any specifics about exactly how, or how badly, a proposed solution is claimed to fall short of acceptability, expressing the rejection in vague terms only. Alternatively, it may be combined with the fallacy of misleading vividness, when a specific example of a solution's failure is described in emotionally powerful detail but base rates are ignored (see availability heuristic).
They are not acting in the best interest of those the endowments are there to serve. They are using the financial clout of the endowments to make a political statement, often to the detriment of the endowment's beneficiaries.
Verizon will have an Internet for its customers, that everyone outside will have to pay to access. Verizon is basically trying to create a model where the Internet at large must pay for access to its customers eyeballs.
There are many places where "airplane" space goes all the way to the ground. One inch off the ground puts you in FAA controlled airspace in these areas.
Class B, C, and D airports all have controlled airspace to the surface within a few miles of the runway center, and some Class E (non-towered fields) also have Class E airspace "to the surface."
I don't know where this occurred, but it's entirely possible that he was flying in controlled airspace.
This is a fine for willfully putting someone in danger and destroying property. The pilot should be thanking his lucky stars that the FAA gets to process this in administrative law court rather than the State process it through criminal court.
Rand Paul is really proving just what an imbecile he is. Stocks are just pieces of paper that say you own 1/Nth of a company that may or may not be worth anything.
I honestly thought the show was pretty funny for the first couple of seasons, but then it wore off. Why? Because it's just the same formulaic, stereotypical nonsense after 7 or 8 seasons.
It's basically a very predictable slapstick comedy with a bunch of technical and scientific jargon sprinkled on it.
Did you happen to read TFA? In the TFA, it is said that the College Board does not take points off for factual errors. In fact, it says that it cares not for factual errors, because errors in fact seldom subtract from the quality of the essay being graded.
Slashdot Mirror
The price hasn't plummeted because, while the supply is large, the cost of extraction is much higher, owing to its much higher difficulty. It's not as simple as drilling into a big cavern and sucking it out, you know.
Actually, they started calling him a hypocrite, not a socialist. He is a hypocrite because, while he insists he should pay more in tax, he actually does not. Nothing is stopping him making a gift to the treasury in the amount he thinks he ought to be paying, but they have yet to receive any payments.
"Every species that's alive today, including polar bears, managed to survive that massive 400-ft increase in sea level."
Polar Bears did not have palatial mansions along the shoreline.
And yes, you are right that there are not supposed to be any ice caps. But, you'll never convince alarmists of that. To them it's just propaganda.
Bans will not only not prevent them being developed, probably even by a technologically advanced State that is a signatory to the treaty, but it will also not prevent them being used by rogue or puppet states who don't care about bans, or who use them at the behest of a signatory state that is just using them to do their dirty work.
It's called a "local email client." Get one, like Thunderbird or Outlook, and teach him how to use it. It will never change unless you change it.
In fact, in Spanish, the word for a TV set is "televisor."
But, but, that would require government getting involved, and the libertarian narrative won't allow that. The free market will dictate that these safeguards exist if they are supposed to exist. Right?
Revenue is important, and so are revenue trends, but where is the P/L?
The link that says "earnings statement" is anything but an earnings statement.
Shhhhh... your observation does not support this administration's agenda.
No, that is not what I am saying at all.
Indeed, nothing any terrorist could do could cause the United States to cease to exist. Mr. Trollheim here is only correct about that point, but is overblowing the threat by several orders of magnitude.
In the face of an existential threat to the United States, her citizens have a proven track record of rising to the cause (WW1, WW2). Of course, there has been no existential threat to the United States since World War 2, except for maybe the Cold War, but that was an existential threat to all of humanity. So, who knows what Americans would do today? If what I see on TV is any indicator how what Americans think about America, it would not surprise me if American Citizens just laid down and allowed an oppressive regime to march right in and take over, for free stuff..
The perfect solution fallacy is an informal fallacy that occurs when an argument assumes that a perfect solution exists and/or that a solution should be rejected because some part of the problem would still exist after it were implemented. This is an example of black and white thinking, in which a person fails to see the complex interplay between multiple component elements of a situation or problem, and as a result, reduces complex problems to a pair of binary extremes.
It is common for arguments which commit this fallacy to omit any specifics about exactly how, or how badly, a proposed solution is claimed to fall short of acceptability, expressing the rejection in vague terms only. Alternatively, it may be combined with the fallacy of misleading vividness, when a specific example of a solution's failure is described in emotionally powerful detail but base rates are ignored (see availability heuristic).
The fallacy is a type of false dilemma.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N...
They are not acting in the best interest of those the endowments are there to serve. They are using the financial clout of the endowments to make a political statement, often to the detriment of the endowment's beneficiaries.
Stupid.
... walled gardens.
Verizon will have an Internet for its customers, that everyone outside will have to pay to access. Verizon is basically trying to create a model where the Internet at large must pay for access to its customers eyeballs.
Other ISPs are following suit.
"Never mind that the yearly exposure is an order of magnitude or two less"
Is it one order of magnitude less or two? There's a huge difference.
Because this is the tracker the EFF has on the download page for "Privacy Badger."
There are many places where "airplane" space goes all the way to the ground. One inch off the ground puts you in FAA controlled airspace in these areas.
Class B, C, and D airports all have controlled airspace to the surface within a few miles of the runway center, and some Class E (non-towered fields) also have Class E airspace "to the surface."
I don't know where this occurred, but it's entirely possible that he was flying in controlled airspace.
This is a fine for willfully putting someone in danger and destroying property. The pilot should be thanking his lucky stars that the FAA gets to process this in administrative law court rather than the State process it through criminal court.
Rand Paul is really proving just what an imbecile he is. Stocks are just pieces of paper that say you own 1/Nth of a company that may or may not be worth anything.
I honestly thought the show was pretty funny for the first couple of seasons, but then it wore off. Why? Because it's just the same formulaic, stereotypical nonsense after 7 or 8 seasons.
It's basically a very predictable slapstick comedy with a bunch of technical and scientific jargon sprinkled on it.
Did you happen to read TFA? In the TFA, it is said that the College Board does not take points off for factual errors. In fact, it says that it cares not for factual errors, because errors in fact seldom subtract from the quality of the essay being graded.
WTF, right?
"his underground Dallas restaurant, has a waitlist of 3,000"
Food that you have to wait that long to eat is not worth eating.
The FAA will not do anything to punish illegal drone flights by law enforce^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H domestic anti-terror officers.
How cynical of you.
Cynicism is never pointless.