Slashdot Mirror


Google Testing Gmail Redesign

An anonymous reader writes "Google is testing out some big changes for Gmail. Some of the changes are: the sidebar has been replaced with a slide-in pane, the 'compose' button has been moved, and there's a new feature called 'reminders'. From the article: 'Gmail may soon look nothing like the Gmail we all know so well. Google has invited a select group of users to test a completely new interface for the webmail client, according to Geek.com, which appears to be part of the trial. The test version of Gmail — which may never see an official release — dispenses with design elements that have been present from the very early days of the email service.'"

218 comments

  1. How about "no thanks" .... by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Like Slashdot Beta, this is probably being driven by âoeweb designersâ and marketers. It's not good enough that something have reached a state of maturity that works well with users, and they like. Throw away the furniture and toss out the Persian rugs, white carpet and a do-over by Ikea is what we need, right?

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Like Slashdot Beta, this is probably being driven by Ãoeweb designersà and marketers...

      And like "Slashdot Beta", instead of improving the user experience by moving into the present era and supporting Unicode standards... Oh well, no one's listening.

    2. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      mail really doesn't need a 're-invention' in UI. it didn't 10 yrs ago, to be honest. we have understood email for a long time, now.

      put me down as one of those that want a TRUE separation of form and function. I first learned UI stuff via motif (yeah, yeah..) and its UIL concept was pretty cool. you could, even as a user, define the UI in one language and form and the back-end code was entirely separate. the back-end would be updated by the programmers but the UI would (or could) stay stable if the end user wanted.

      why can't we have that idea for web stuff? and even modern apps?

      I have stopped doing updates. no more updates on my phone and no more firefox or thunderbird updates. I'll live with 'older versions' just so that the UI stays the same and won't break on me.

      I have test gear for my work bench that has not changed in half a century. the concept of DMMs, decade boxes, scopes, power supplies - all have pretty stable UI's, rarely do they have touch screens and even the ones that have graphic displays don't re-layout their displays ever 3-6mos, on whimsy. test gear does not change its UI and we are happy for it.

      I'd like to see must-have apps (mail, web) stay stable in their UI and only get security and bugfix updates on one track; and new features/gui on another. then let people choose the stable track or the update track.

      but noooooo. we can't have that. makes too much sense.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    3. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's a widespread problem. If they don't re-design the software every couple of years, what are they getting paid for? Sure they could make the software work on new hardware etc, while keeping the user interface the same.

      But that's not good enough. Somebody out there wants to see new things, tiles, ribbons, etc, everything re-designed every 2 years.

      Making people re-learn how to use their software every couple of years is fun! Do you miss your start button? Learn a new way to start a program! It'll be fun!

      Sure your productivity will drop immediately. But as you learn how to use the new software, your productivity will slowly rise. After a couple of years, it might be up to where it was before! And then it's time for a new version! Learn all that stuff again! Fun!

      The real mystery is why do big companies that buy software put up with this? Surely they should demand that the user interface stays the same, so that they don't have to keep retraining all their staff.

      On my computer, it seems like vi, emacs, fvwm and xterm look and act pretty much the same as 20 years ago. No relearning needed there. Can't we have a stable user interface that people learn once, and then they don't have to keep relearning every 2 years?

    4. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by kasperd · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's not good enough that something have reached a state of maturity that works well with users, and they like.

      That has happened to Gmail multiple times over the years. And each time Google decided that it was time to redesign the Gmail UI. After their last major UI change, I completely gave up on using Gmail to write emails. Now I only use it to read and search emails.

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
    5. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by justthinkit · · Score: 1

      Somebody out there wants to see new things, tiles, ribbons, etc, everything re-designed every 2 years.

      After the Y2K codeathon, hirings went down and the industry slumped. Why can't it do that again, now. Instead of putting us all through these crappy redesigns.

      --
      I come here for the love
    6. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 3

      If they don't re-design the software every couple of years, what are they getting paid for?

      Same as always - they are getting paid by advertisers to place ads alongside our email messages. So it is reasonable to assume any redesign is being done with the goal of improving the efficiency of those ads - improving click through rates and maximizing each ad's visibility.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    7. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think my favorite Hotmail was the MSN version with the blue.
      I think my favorite Yahoo! Mail was the one right before the change a year back.

      Although, I did like the Mobile Hotmail before the current version. Although, the new version does have some nice features, but I'd rather have the old one.

      When Mozilla updates FireFox and breaks scripts, that's it, I'll stick with an older one. They need to learn to fork as you mention.

    8. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It is not just email.

      The problem is the art scene and elitist art professors forcing designers and web developers to do things the NEW way. That is make it like a stop sign in ALL CAPS, no features, all minimalism, flat, or these students get bad grades.

      Guess what? When they graduate they work for companies like Apple, Google, and Microsoft. Windows 8 and the horrible blinding white Office 2013/office 365 looks identical. All high contrast. Gradients ewww that is soo 2003. Borders? No distraction that is the old way. Features... eww CLUTTER.

      Skuemorphism is where we need to go back to. It worked fine the way it way and

    9. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by Arker · · Score: 0, Troll

      (Speaking of separating semantic data from presentation directives):

      "why can't we have that idea for web stuff? and even modern apps?"

      We kind of sort of do - it was baked into the idea of the web from the start - but advertising firms and 'designers' got involved pretty early too, and neither of them can stand it. They now collectively have firm control of the W3C and every major browser as well so it's a difficult fight at this point.

      I have to admit I let myself be seduced by webmail many years ago and this might be the straw that drives me back to mutt. The idea of webmail is great - get your mail in a simple standard interface that's system agnostic, without having to carry your tool around with you from computer to computer, it's just a few k that can load over the net into your browser wherever and whenever you need it.

      Only now, ever so many years later, it's become far from that. It's a massive web app that requires me to disable basic sanity and security checks in order to even load, and it exists in order to push advertising at me more effectively, NOT to let me access my email more effectively. Every change they make that clearer and clearer.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    10. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      Hell I gave up and switched to thunderbird to get my emails. At least I know mozilla with any luck won't piss all over a simple UI. And if they do, it'll take them 3-4 revisions to get there before some genius who majored in art got their hands on it. Gmail's UI, along with their constant redesigns for searches, are getting as bad as the whole ribbon UI that MS started slapping in everywhere.

      In my book the basic UI is pretty much done. And the reason is, we're on a flat screen surface. There's only so far you can go in simplicity. What they're doing now is trying to justify their place within the company while making statements that "people want change, and change is good." While making simple things more difficult to accomplish and trying to justify it as even easier.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    11. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by NIK282000 · · Score: 1

      Not changing the UI slows down cashflow in cloud/web/consumer stuff, the more they change the more money changes hands.

      --
      Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
    12. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by lgw · · Score: 2

      I've mostly switched to Outlook.com now. I was surprised at how much it doesn't suck (I don't want to be impressed by my email interface, dammit, I just want it to not suck, so I never care about it). I guess Hotmail was so bad that the "designers" were actually fixing things that were broken, but whatever, it's worth a look if you're in the "dammit Google not again" camp I am.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    13. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by mwvdlee · · Score: 4, Interesting

      From the description, this didn't sound all that bad.
      From the screenshot, it looks like a step back.
      They're not turning the sidebar into a slide-in pane in order to make more room for other things, they're just doing it in order to make the site look cool.
      They're turning what looks like a site where the user is in control, to a site where the user is just a passive consumer.
      I've turned sidebars into slide-in panes myself, but only if the sidebars are actually getting in the way of the other content.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    14. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by mlts · · Score: 1

      I will use web UIs in a pinch, and usually they are what I have available, but I will say that I'd far rather use a time-tested MUA (Thunderbird, even Outlook) than most Web based UIs. IIRC, (and I could be wrong) No Web based client supports S/MIME except Exchange/OWA, and that is with a browser add-on. PGP/gpg can be done by manual copy/paste, but the Symantec Encryption Desktop (i.e. PGP) plugin or enigmail make it a lot easier to use.

      E-mail isn't something that has changed much, so having the Web UI changing as if it were a fashion is more annoying than useful.

    15. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by gmhowell · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Somebody out there wants to see new things, tiles, ribbons, etc, everything re-designed every 2 years.

      After the Y2K codeathon, hirings went down and the industry slumped. Why can't it do that again, now. Instead of putting us all through these crappy redesigns.

      It'll happen in about 24 years.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    16. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Outlook.com is also BLEEDING WHITE and blue with all the features removed.

      Gmail is a bad copy. Apple is even copying this crap in IOS 7

    17. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    18. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by BradMajors · · Score: 1

      I would gmail to delete my email after I have downloaded it with POP3 and I have set both my client and gmail to delete my email after it has been downloaded. I guess that would be too much to hope for.

    19. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by David_W · · Score: 4, Insightful

      At least I know mozilla with any luck won't piss all over a simple UI.

      I'm sorry, have you seen Chromefox 29?

    20. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, have you seen Chromefox 29?

      > And if they do, it'll take them 3-4 revisions to get there before some genius who majored in art got their hands on it.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    21. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by wasteoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I find your lack of [consistent site font] disturbing.

    22. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you forget that Google is staffed by young engineers (intentionally) who are too immature that realize that "new" doesn't mean "better". The old rule of "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" has never been uttered by these fine folk.

      Perish the thought that something that is mature and works should be left alone.

    23. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      The thing is, gmail hasn't "reached a state of maturity that works well with users."

      Or if it did, it left it behind long ago.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    24. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by blackpaw · · Score: 1

      Skuemorphism is where we need to go back to. It worked fine the way it way and

      I was with you till you mentioned Skuemorphism, that needs to die in a fire ASAP. Poxy volume control knobs in a mouse driven UI.

    25. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why does Skuemorphism need to go? IT WORKS.

      So what if you have pretty shadows, gradients, and gulp a leather background on your address book?

      I will take that any idea over a blinding white HUGE TEXT where I see 1/2 of the content before and have the address book now hidden where I have to do a search and get a freaking closed door metro style syndrome of having the whole screen change at once to get a contact?!

      Or am I misinformed here? I feel the anti skuemorphism crowd is the one propagating new UI should be all big minimal and dumbed down as these are computers and not the virtual devices they are replacing correct? But the original device was made to look that way is because it worked so why change it?

    26. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You might be onto something there. By making the task less efficient, the user spends more time - and moves his eyes around a lot more looking for the button he needs - both of which mean he's more likely to see the ad and respond to it.

      It's a kind of reverse ergonomics.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    27. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by retchdog · · Score: 4, Insightful

      skeuomorphism is dumb because design elements intended for, say, "sorting" a book by putting your finger in the right notch should never be used in an app.

      yes, it is even more dumb to use giant 72 pt. text instead, but that doesn't make skeuomorphism a good idea.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    28. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2

      But people do not snort by doing this in real life. I do not think that is skuemorphism.

      The emphasis is then switched to view content and all text. If you watch the Metro team working on Windows 8 it is all they talked about. So extreme that is all you get. Functionality need to work.

      Some like me ... gulp ... like clutter if it means more shit on the screen. If we wanted less intrusion I would still use a 15 inch monitor and have everything big ugly 800 x 600 resolution text. We went 1080p so we can have more. Not less. this and even the current iteration of gmail is making me less productive and we are emulating ancient Windows 1.0 with shitty screens but with prettier text due to DPI and resolutions but nothing else.

    29. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by lannocc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I find your lack of [consistent site font] disturbing.

      But his font was fixed-width. Could it be any more consistent?

    30. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by naasking · · Score: 1

      Like Slashdot Beta, this is probably being driven by âoeweb designersâ and marketers.

      Have you considered that perhaps they're going for more more convenient vertical integration and better workflow to help them supplant Microsoft's enterprise offerings? I'm all for that. Prematurely judging the interface before even trying it sounds pretty silly to me.

    31. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by lannocc · · Score: 1

      Web-mail is just implemented poorly, pretty much everywhere. I get a lot of use out of email and sieve filtering with nested folders in a functional hierarchy. IMAP makes for a good (generic) message-handling protocol, but mail clients are lacking features. I'd like a federated contact/messaging/calendar client and server that someone could run as their own service if they wanted. It could expose via IMAP access to stored chat or SMS messages in addition to email, from any number of sources/accounts. As a client, it needs to let me maintain a customizable client view, where for example IMAP folders that can be listed in any particular order, not necessarily alphabetically or based on their archival storage hierarchy.

      As to UI design and separating form from function, I have spent the past few years (slowly) developing a server-side shell-like environment on Linux+Java/Tomcat, with a focus on XML and rapid-prototyping, quick database access. Just about to go beta as I add some more documentation: http://iovar.com./

    32. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or just use english as that's the language of the internet anyway..

    33. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      fuck skeuomorphic rubbish.. that shit's as bad as the worst custom skinned vb application.

    34. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by epyT-R · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How about simple unadorned windows, maybe with a few simple hard gradients, where applications conform to the UI standards and conventions the OS imposes on them? Sadly enough, I think windows 2000 did this best, or xp with luna turned off. Everything that came after, from any vendor, not just ms, was just overdone plumbing. When the 3D accelerated stuff came along with aqua and aero, it just made things slower and laggier..and uglier. Now it's swinging hard back the other way, leaving the bloat, ugly, and wasted screen space, yet simplifying things into fisherprice counterparts.

    35. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to admit I let myself be seduced by webmail many years ago and this might be the straw that drives me back to mutt.

      Seconded.

      I went back to mutt a few years ago and never looked back. If I could figure out how to get /usr/bin/msmtp to cooperate with elm, I might even try going further back. On a 1080p screen, I can have 80 emails displayed in an 80x80 terminal window. It's gloriously readable, and my hands never leave the home keys.

    36. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by hodet · · Score: 1

      I use gmail with thunderbird and generally avoid the webmail unless absolutely necessary. I have always found it god awful. Email is a simple UI but google has managed to bastardize the webmail client for no reason I can really understand.

    37. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...unless they finally get folders working properly.

      Am I really the last old bastard on Earth who likes to file thing hierarchically and who only uses search as a last resort?

    38. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So that's why they went with the "Everything is a major update! Look at our ePeen #!"

    39. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by DutchUncle · · Score: 2

      If they don't re-design the software every couple of years, what are they getting paid for?

      Sadly, this same attitude is even *stronger * with *worse* results among the people who AREN'T getting paid - the open source community. Every time I read that "project X has fewer commits, it must be dying", I know I'm reading an inexperienced child who doesn't appreciate things reaching maturity and WORKING. Nobody says "Can openers haven't changed much lately, I guess nobody uses them any more" or "USB memory sticks are pretty much the same, I guess nobody uses them any more."

    40. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the problem with refusing the Mozilla updates is in missing the security updates - maybe not as bad a situation as IE 6/XP, but still not wise.

      Since I never really have liked the Gmail UI since I joined up in late 2005, I have always used the POP3 client of SeaMonkey (plain Mozilla before TBird/FF were split from it, and Netscape before that) to maintain something of a persistent UI (with folders even!) since I started using Internet email (vs corporate email - i.e. VM PROFS/OfficeVision on IBM mainframes, Outlook, Lotus Notes) in a big way in the late 90's. That also has let me save my emails going back that far in much the same format (although there seem to have been several internal format changes, but the old emails have survived them).

      Seamonkey is still updated to keep up with the underlying I'net standards, and security updates, mostly from a common code base with FF/Tbird from what I can tell, but without such radical UI changes - best of both worlds for me.

    41. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by mjwx · · Score: 2

      It is not just email.

      The problem is the art scene and elitist art professors forcing designers and web developers to do things the NEW way. That is make it like a stop sign in ALL CAPS, no features, all minimalism, flat, or these students get bad grades.

      Really, you can blame the whole "UX" fad for destroying sensible HMI/HCI based design.

      The stop sign is a classic case of form following function. Bold red colour, so you notice it. Unique shape, so you can tell what it is before you get close enough to read it. Simple and to the point, designed by engineers.

      UX brings in a shit load of bollocks around it rather than making it as simple as it needs to be. When you start talking about how the user feels and using buzzwords like "Holistic" and "paradigm" over just finding out if a user can understand it without assistance you have a serious problem. In the best cases, UX looks at how non-engineers think people use something rather than analysing the function and determining the simplest way to do it, this is why we end up with absolutely shocking interfaces. In the worst cases, UX places other concerns above the actual function, like serving advertising or becoming victim to the UX designers personal whims whilst ignoring the reality that most people dont do it that way.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    42. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I liked your ideas till you threw in "Java" - if that means applets on my client machine, no way. But if you mean server-side, then no problem - massage it any way you want there as long as I can KISS it on my end (hmm ... that comes out a bit odd sounding ;-) ).

    43. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by yanyan · · Score: 1

      It's nice to see google focusing on the Real Important Stuff, instead of things like proper message quoting in replies -- fixing top-posting, which only idiots use.

    44. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by Camael · · Score: 1

      skeuomorphism is dumb because design elements intended for, say, "sorting" a book by putting your finger in the right notch should never be used in an app.

      You mean like the use of tabs and separators in diaries?

      Oddly enough, as I am reading this I look at the top of my browser and -lo and behold- I see tabs. Which work very well in flipping between the various web pages I have open.

    45. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by lannocc · · Score: 1

      Oh, no applets! All server-side Java for IOVAR.

    46. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a widespread problem. If they don't re-design the software every couple of years, what are they getting paid for? Sure they could make the software work on new hardware etc, while keeping the user interface the same. But that's not good enough. Somebody out there wants to see new things, tiles, ribbons, etc, everything re-designed every 2 years.

      No better business case has ever been made for downsizing every UX department to the bare minimum.

      Given the cost to the customer associated with retraining, you could even make a case that some vendors ought to pay their one remaining lonely UX person to read /. all day long whenever no new products are being designed. Customers would be happy, vendor would be more profitable, and the one UX person per company would have enough spare time to express his vision on personal projects without ruining things for the rest of us.

    47. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by seebs · · Score: 2

      No, it doesn't work.

      The canonical example was quicktime player (around version 4) having a volume control which was a graphical representation of a thumb wheel, so if you wanted to adjust the volume, you clicked on the wheel and dragged it up or down. Because that was a way volume controls worked on physical objects, right?

      There are a lot of requirements on physical objects that don't apply to user interfaces, and accommodating them does not "work" in any useful sense.

      So, yes. You are misinformed. You're using the word which means "making the user interface look just like a physical object", and using it as a malapropism for "make the user interface be complicated".

      Look at your browser window. See that search input field? That should be gone, in your world, because a physical newspaper wouldn't have a search bar, and skuemorphism means we shouldn't have user interface elements that don't look like real things. No scroll bars, either, because you should physically reach over to the lower-right corner of the window, click the little corner-thing, and drag it up and left so it "turns the page".

      Sound stupid? Yeah. It does. And that's what your post is saying.

      --
      My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    48. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by nmb3000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Really, you can blame the whole "UX" fad for destroying sensible HMI/HCI based design.

      The stop sign is a classic case of form following function. Bold red colour, so you notice it. Unique shape, so you can tell what it is before you get close enough to read it. Simple and to the point, designed by engineers.

      UX brings in a shit load of bollocks around it rather than making it as simple as it needs to be.

      Exactly this. UX as a whole is a cancer on modern computing -- nothing more than a combination of follow-the-leader and a circle-jerk. All it takes is for someone presents a (completely wrong) idea and, as long as they are authoritative about it, the other UX sheep will view that opinion as gospel, not to be questioned but only blindly followed. This might be a teacher at a school or a company like Google.

      A perfect recent example is this Stack Exchange question regarding traffic signals. An ignorant (but inquisitive) person asks why traffic signals are always three vertical lights instead of some cool new UX-y system of LEDs and poor contrast. An answer posted which sounded very authoritative (but included no references) and had a few pretty pictures was immediately up-voted by the other UX sheep, even though the answer is completely wrong. The author eventually went and made some edits to claim his view was "just historical" to cover up the fact that he was glaringly wrong about the issue of color blindness.

      You can see this behavior everywhere. Microsoft following Apple, Mozilla following Google. It has nothing to do with something being empiraclly or evidently better -- it's simply everyone following the hipster cool kid in class around because, well, he wouldn't be popular if he wasn't right!

      We've had computer usability studies for decades now which have provided some keen insights into how people intuit the function of computer (some very interesting ones from the original Mac and Windows 95 timeframes). UX, however, has nothing to do with research or study -- it's little more than populist bullshit.

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    49. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by tlhIngan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Like Slashdot Beta, this is probably being driven by Ãoeweb designersà and marketers. It's not good enough that something have reached a state of maturity that works well with users, and they like. Throw away the furniture and toss out the Persian rugs, white carpet and a do-over by Ikea is what we need, right?

      The problem is a very vocal minority call for redesigns because designs get "stale".

      The most obvious is to take a look at UIs that haven't changed too much - OS X and iOS. They were functional and they worked. But more and more, people see how Android changes its UI practically every version, and seeing that OS X and iOS stay the same and change little, call it "stale", "dated" and "not evolving".

      So you get people who are always looking for the new shiny convincing everyone that to look and act different is good, it shows you're "evolving" and "changing" and "innovative".

      And then there's the rest of us who are trying to get shit done, and having the whole base of our work ripped from under us continually.

      There's no love when you keep things the same - the users get their work done the same. But change it up, and those minority say "cool" and "innovative" and stuff, even though to everyone else, it just means they have to spend more time doing what they were doing because the new UI is less efficient.

      More shiny, that's it. Keeping something the same for more than two versions is stale, old, passe.

      I just wish these people would realize that if you need to sell someone on the new UI, you did a bad job. Like iOS7, the new Firefox, Windows 8, Gmail, etc. People want to get shit done, not figure out where the (*&@#% you put the commands now.

    50. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The solution is to bring the interface under your own control. After Gmail's last change of interface, I switched to using a local email client, Thunderbird. Consequently, this new change doesn't affect me at all. I can customise Thunderbird to work the way I want it to - and if Thunderbird ever gets an interface "upgrade", someone will fork it. It's still a bit of a pain to switch to the fork - but you can't fork the Gmail web interface.

      In other words: the interface between back-end and front-end for mail is SMTP/IMAP/POP3. The server is the back-end, and the local email client is the front-end.

    51. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      mail really doesn't need a 're-invention' in UI. it didn't 10 yrs ago, to be honest.

      Ironically, Gmail brought us the last major worthwhile change in mail UI - conversation view - in April 2004, just over 10 years ago.

    52. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I quit using G-mail when I could no longer opt-out of the WYSIWYG editor. Of course the new editor is better - why wouldn't *everyone* want to use it?

    53. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Some like me ... gulp ... like clutter if it means more shit on the screen.

      Here is a terrific discussion of exactly this sentiment:
      http://aviation.stackexchange....

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    54. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by Raenex · · Score: 3, Funny

      When you start talking about how the user feels and using buzzwords like "Holistic" and "paradigm" over just finding out if a user can understand it without assistance you have a serious problem.

      We have to leverage holistic paradigms to incentivise platform consumers to meet our time to market challenges.

    55. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by lemur3 · · Score: 1

      Firefox is now, as of the earlier this month release, using the same GUI that Thunderbird has used since 2012.

    56. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by silviuc · · Score: 1

      I was going to ask "does it support IMAP?" and then I asked Thunderbird to create an account and there it was, IMAP for the damn thing. I guess it's now only a question of how much one trusts MS, Yahoo (they have IMAP access too) over Google

    57. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      toss out the Persian rugs, white carpet and a do-over by Ikea is what we need, right?

      No - theyre the only good thing ever to come out of Iran

    58. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Every time I read that "project X has fewer commits, it must be dying",

      I know what you mean. There's one OSS project I use, and I know the original developer still uses it a lot. The last major release was from over a year ago and there have been few commits since.

      Why?

      Well, basically it works and works well. The author as far as I can tell seems to be content with using it for what it was designed and hasn't found any missing features glaring enough to be worth fixing.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    59. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by oji-sama · · Score: 1

      I trust them slightly more when talking about email privacy, but personally I'm transferring my mails to a local nonprofit.

      --
      It is what it is.
    60. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by Threni · · Score: 1

      It's because, despite the growth in tools, better IDEs etc, writing quality software, especially complex software, is hard, and the standard of development has gone down because people are chasing short term costs. Better to get some newb muppet to write something quickly and cheaply, throw a lot of tests at it to check it sort of does something without crashing (better hope the specs were ok), and cash the cheque before any changes are required (cheaper to start from scratch). Adding complexity just makes it more expensive so let's not offer the user any choices, shall we? You'll work *this* way, you won't have any options. The web is largely like that now (white screens with a single column of text in the middle - who needs 24 inch monitors when you can get away with a 17 inch one), Android apps with next to no options (thanks, Google) etc.

    61. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gmail still has it's original old plain HTML interface, although they hide the option to switch to it fairly well.

    62. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Some like me ... gulp ... like clutter if it means more shit on the screen.

      You are still only comparing skeuomorphism to a full-screen metro style interface. A better comparison would be a more traditional Android style, now copied by iOS. Skeuomorphism just obfuscates functionality because it isn't obvious what is a control and what isn't, and the controls can't have standard icons or text labels on them either. Space is wasted on fancy graphics. A flat, clean interface that makes efficient use of the screen is best, and both skeuomorphism and metro style are dumb.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    63. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Top post is for only for idiots eh?

      It's nice to see google focusing on the Real Important Stuff, instead of things like proper message quoting in replies -- fixing top-posting, which only idiots use.

    64. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quit being an attention whore and use the same font as everyone else!

    65. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      I thought Gmail had an option to pick the quoting style, notwithstanding the ability to use a real e-mail client of one's choice via IMAP or POP3.

    66. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, have you seen Chromefox 29?

      Yes I did and I thought:

      "If I wanted to use the Chrome UI I'd be using Chrome"

      And I googled and installed Classic Theme Restorer to make it right and proper again.

    67. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      What, and forget to synergize our core competencies with our emotional intelligence as well?

    68. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mail really doesn't need a 're-invention' in UI. it didn't 10 yrs ago, to be honest. we have understood email for a long time, now.

      Who is this "we" you are talking about? It's certainly not microsoft and most Outlook clones.

    69. Re: How about "no thanks" .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I quit using the gmail webpage when I learned of pop.gmail.com.

    70. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, they messed up maps, now they want to make mail unusable!

    71. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they change Gmail, my wife is going to be really PO'ed. She has an extremely hard time learning any application and when they move something or make it behave differently, she has a conniption. Thanks a lot Google.

    72. Re: How about "no thanks" .... by TWX · · Score: 1

      Am I weird that I'd use a clone of the PINE interface if they'd add one to gmail?

      I was somewhat annoyed when they did-away with the "Terminal" theme in the sense that they got rid of the green-on-black with fixed-width fonts.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    73. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was with you until you said "high contrast, eww". contrastrebellion.com

    74. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this (and more...privacy) is why I ditched my Google account all together.

    75. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Gmail may soon look nothing like the Gmail we all know so well

      Wait, didn't that already happen. A bunch of times?

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    76. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too true. I need to use 3 extensions with Firefox just so it could remain usable for me. Ridiculous. Sometimes I feel like I just delete it and reinstall v3.6 the last usable one.

    77. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by lgw · · Score: 1

      I trust them the most of the big players, mostly because they don't have a "social" product to tie everything too.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    78. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if we do not replicate physical objects than what is left? Content. That is what I am trying to say. Everyone wants to be all white and simple like Google's search page. Fact is the things we use accumulate features over the years and it ruins them.

      The new gmail is just all content because someone thought having an inbox, outbox, is too skuemorphic as it resembles a desk tray.

    79. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      So why do you care? You're not a gmail user, since when it was released 10 years ago you claim email didn't need reinventing then.
      Go tell someone to get off your lawn.

    80. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by kasperd · · Score: 1

      gmail still has it's original old plain HTML interface, although they hide the option to switch to it fairly well.

      I know about it, and I did use it for some period when the default interface was unusable for me. But that interface is less functional than the original Gmail interface. It is comparable with webmail interfaces from before Gmail surfaced.

      I have been wondering if there is an open source webmail system, I could host myself, which is as functional as Gmail was when it was best.

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
    81. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you have trouble with the most basic aspects of writing, such as how to start or end a sentence, your opinion on using email doesn't really matter.

    82. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by retchdog · · Score: 1

      uh, yes they do. i put "sort" in quotes, because what i meant was putting your finger on the "T" tab for people whose names start with "T" and so on. there's no obviously good reason to do this in a UI. of course it works but it would be an amazing coincidence indeed if it were the best solution. remember how winamp had both a stop button and a pause button, even though there's no difference between the two when you're playing mp3s.

      after that, i lost track of what the hell you're blithering about, but it sounds like you're complaining about a particular implementation. i don't care. i am not defending that implementation.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    83. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by retchdog · · Score: 1

      yeah, so?

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    84. Re:How about "no thanks" .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another gmhowell 1 line fart reply!

  2. OH GOD PLEASE NO, STOP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They already RUINED Google Maps, please don't ruin Gmail as well.

    I think I might have to consider running my own crap, I'm sick of Google.

    1. Re:OH GOD PLEASE NO, STOP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They already ruined Gmail when they created the current layout that is about ten times slower than the one prior to it. Now they are going to ruin it further.

      I have already moved over to outlook.com because it's speedy and gets the job done.

    2. Re:OH GOD PLEASE NO, STOP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, good point, the new one was slow as hell.

      I was considering using Outlook, but then Microsoft became even more stupid and put password size limits in place and I have still been unable to recover my Hotmail account.
      I am more done with Microsoft than I am Google. If I can't get my email address back even while being able to demonstrate that I own the account, I do not want to even remotely be near a company that bad.

    3. Re:OH GOD PLEASE NO, STOP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I understand. I would probably do the same in your shoes. This is the first and only time I have setup an email with a Microsoft service, so I just had my Gmail stuff forward to Outlook.com until was sure everyone had my new address and then closed the Google account. It was worthless to me anyway after Google instituted a Google+ only policy for YouTube.

    4. Re:OH GOD PLEASE NO, STOP by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      They haven't ruined Google Maps. Just click on the gear icon, and select "return to Classic Maps".

      When this option goes away, then you can say "They RUINED Google Maps". Not until then.

  3. Excellent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been meaning to move everything associated with my gmail account over to the email associated with the domain I purchased recently. Hasn't seemed to be a really pressing need to go ahead and do it -- but now there is! Thanks Google... and goodbye!

    1. Re:Excellent! by CheshireDragon · · Score: 1

      This is your best bet. I did this years ago and haven't looked back. I couldn't be happier knowing that I am in control of my own email system.

      --
      "That's right...I said it."
    2. Re:Excellent! by BradMajors · · Score: 1

      Google's spam filtering is very good. If you use your own domain you might have a problem with spam.

    3. Re:Excellent! by sgbett · · Score: 1

      I do, but its worth it.

      --
      Invaders must die
    4. Re:Excellent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google spam filtering is just a normal Bayesian filter. Anyone who can set up their own email server can set that up trivially.

  4. Google's motto by MrEricSir · · Score: 4, Funny

    Google's motto should be "We don't care about design, and it shows!"

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    1. Re:Google's motto by CheshireDragon · · Score: 1

      Google's motto should be "We don't care about you, and it shows!"

      That could work too. Honestly I think it's a better fit by encompassing everything they do.

      --
      "That's right...I said it."
    2. Re:Google's motto by jellomizer · · Score: 2

      Ah the Slashdot motto! "DON'T CHANGE ANYTHING" any changes will put my mind into shock.

      In short, if Google doesn't change their interface every now and then, competitors will come up and dethrone them. Like Google did with Hotmail and Yahoo Mail.

      Is there a risk of making these changes, yes. Sometimes people will not like the change and fall back to what they want. But other times if done properly, it keeps the curve up, so their competitors are trying to catch up to them.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  5. moving the compose button!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    seriously, since when is a minor UI edit stuff that matters

    what a sad downspiral

  6. New design looks AWESOME! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wish it was open source, would love to run this on my own server.

    1. Re:New design looks AWESOME! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, all of that wasted space on the sides are totally awesome.

  7. I will be totally outraged for a few days ... by Laxori666 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... and completely despise all the changes. Then in another week or so I'll get used to it and not mind it. A week after that I'll think the old interface looks atrocious.

    1. Re:I will be totally outraged for a few days ... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

      I mainly interact with my work gmail via IMAP - so I probably won't notice the redesign for a good, long while.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:I will be totally outraged for a few days ... by excelsior_gr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Indeed, I'm a Gmail user from the very beginning and although the layout has changed significantly over the years, none of the changes was actually bad. Different, yes, but they didn't suck. Although a lot of functions were added that are IMHO rather nonsense, they are kept out of the way and the UI always remained very intuitive. Also, Gmail (besides offering a huge amount of space for no charge and a spam filter that is actually very good) launched the "search, don't sort" idea which was pretty revolutionary for web-email at the time. They seemed to come into conflict with that idea by introducing folders and "labels" but, as I said, it is very easy to ignore them.

      Also, they have a very cool feature, that lets you adjust the amount of whitespace by choosing between the "comfortable", "cozy" and "compact" settings. Are you listening, Slashdot designers?

    3. Re:I will be totally outraged for a few days ... by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "I mainly interact with my work gmail via IMAP - so I probably won't notice the redesign for a good, long while."

      Exactly! You see it only when creating a new email account after all.

      If the young whippersnappers want to use a browser with crappy filtering and watch ads, they are welcome.

    4. Re:I will be totally outraged for a few days ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just use an email client. Gmail, IMAP, and Thunderbird. I haven't logged into my Gmail account over the web in years!

    5. Re:I will be totally outraged for a few days ... by captainpanic · · Score: 1

      Where you said "week", I say "month".

      But I agree that sometimes change is not bad, but only takes some getting used to. However, there are cases where change is indeed quite bad: the new Google Maps is a step back compared to the previous version, and our beloved slashdot beta would be a step back too.

      Looking at the screenshot, I would want some features (logout, preferences) near the top-right corner, like on each and every other website on this planet. Also, I want to access sent mail in 1 click. All other stuff is free for the marketing gurus to play with.

      The main question I have is: does it improve anything for me? (And also, since this is a prototype, I wonder how much this will be watered down until I get it on my screen).

    6. Re:I will be totally outraged for a few days ... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      I never got "search don't sort". Amazingly, I find I'm better at sorting (esp labelling) than searching.

      But I found a lot of the changes quite frustrating. I don't need an internal windowing system built into the browser, I have an OS.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    7. Re:I will be totally outraged for a few days ... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Thing is, all the past redesigns have not had much wasted space - aside from the atrocious default spacing between items in the list view, but you can tweak that easily. All in all, it's a decent UI that presents a lot of information in a given space and doesn't waste my time on bling.

      OTOH, if you look at the screenshots in TFA, it's all kinds of bad precisely from that angle. It actually looks a lot like someone took mobile UI and just scaled it up. Or, closer yet, it looks like G+, which has always been a crapshoot. Huge wasted margins on both sides, huge items etc. It looks very dumbed down, and not in a good way.

    8. Re:I will be totally outraged for a few days ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Search, don't sort"

      Slightly different approaches, that both have their uses. If I've got a preexisting inbox of 200 email, the quickest way to deal with it is to sort-by-sender, then shift-click-delete entire blocks of junk, and label the meaningful stuff accordingly.

      Can I do something similar with search?

  8. Guess they planto ruin it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Like they have maps. Iused the old maps to look at real estate but the new version is worthless.
    I went from using it 30 40 times a day to 0.

  9. Think I'll stick with an IMAP client by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I think I'll stick with a standalone IMAP mail client, something that doesn't hide functionality beneath layers of inconsistent and ludicrous UI. Maybe emacs

  10. Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since you've posted as an Anonymous Coward, how will Google know where to send the cute boys to give you a blow job?

  11. Bring back SMS/Chat by flogger · · Score: 1

    Just over a month ago, Google dropped the SMS chat feature that has been present in Google labs for years. it has worked great and was the main reason I switched to gmail. Discussing it with other tech folks we can only conjecture that Google has ditched it because it was one of the ways people have found to sens SMS messages from a source that the NSA can;t track. (Create throw away email through some random VPN.) Contemplating going back to my own email server again. This new beta look might just be what pushes me over the edge.

    --
    ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
    "First things first -- but not necessarily in that order"
    -- The Doctor, "Doctor
    1. Re:Bring back SMS/Chat by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps maintaining a rarely-used feature just cost more than it was worth. SMS gateways aren't particularly cheap, from what I've heard.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    2. Re:Bring back SMS/Chat by BradMajors · · Score: 1

      More likely Google wants everyone to move to Google Hangouts.

  12. It can't be any worse than what's in place now.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The previous interface was quite good. The new interface has nontintuitive buttons that move around based on context.

  13. Wow they better be careful with this by bazmail · · Score: 1

    ... they could easily hang themselves with this tinkering. It may end up saving Yahoo Mail by creating a diaspora.

  14. New Coke? (Coca-Cola) by turkeydance · · Score: 2

    Vista? Edsel? my name is Legion, for we are many.

  15. Indeed by mystikkman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If it's anything like the new Google maps, no thanks. Its atrocious and no one can find anything that was previously accessible.

    1. Re:Indeed by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Informative

      My 'favorite' part of the new Google Maps design is trying to look at traffic. You have to mouse over the search bar. Makes perfect sense.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:Indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      mother of god, that's where they hid it!

      How can they be so schizophrenic that they change maps to use the whole screen (not all bad, just completely flawed in every other way) and fuck up gmail to not use the entire screen? They, of all people, should know that the metadata and load times are the important parts.

    3. Re:Indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah Gmail redesigns have generally been good. But what they did to maps was a crime almost.

    4. Re:Indeed by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Same thing for Terrain, by the way.

  16. Not really like the direction Gmail is going by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tabbed inbox... terrible; Google drive integration.. meh; the messaging composition UI introduced a while ago.. meh

    Full disclosure: I'm an old fart, not a big fan of webmailers and prefer Thunderbird to manage my multiple email accounts.

  17. Thank god... by jez9999 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... I'm still using an old version of Thunderbird. I don't get my mailnews interface overhauled every 5 minutes and that's the way I likes it. Web apps are overrated.

    1. Re:Thank god... by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      how is this a troll?

  18. I kinda preferred the old GMail by Chas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Honestly, the current version is badly cluttered, and this implementation is just a bunch of porcine lipstick.

    I want a nice, clean, fast-loading interface. The closer I can get to a raw text-list interface on it the better. I don't WANT shit popping out at me from any given direction.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:I kinda preferred the old GMail by excelsior_gr · · Score: 4, Informative

      Use this link to access your account:

      https://mail.google.com/mail/?...

      The UI will launch in HTML mode. It is usually triggered for old browsers or slow internet connections.

    2. Re:I kinda preferred the old GMail by Billly+Gates · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You know it is pretty sad when we look at a 2005 era IE 6 optimized version of a site as a principle of good design.

      What the hell happened?

    3. Re:I kinda preferred the old GMail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is EXACTLY what I do now (ever since Gmail changed their UI for the worse the last time). Incidentally, I use m.facebook.com, as well. SO much better.

    4. Re:I kinda preferred the old GMail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking hell... it's beautiful.

    5. Re:I kinda preferred the old GMail by DutchUncle · · Score: 2

      I don't think anyone is holding it up as a principle of "good" design; it is being held up as an example of "simple, functional, gets-the-job-done" design. Like a Shaker chair - there's exactly enough there to be a chair, nothing extra, nothing less.

    6. Re:I kinda preferred the old GMail by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Like a Shaker chair - there's exactly enough there to be a chair, nothing extra, nothing less.

      I couldn't figure out why you were talking about this as simple design. Then I realized what you were talking about.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    7. Re:I kinda preferred the old GMail by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      it looks really good to me. i wish my desktop apps looked like this. lean, mean, no nonsense, blinding fast to load. what's not to like?

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    8. Re:I kinda preferred the old GMail by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

      What the hell happened?

      A combination of lack of UI standards and bright shiny object syndrome.

      Remember when there were actual UI standards for applications? When people who designed UI's for OS'es understood that there had to be some commonality in applications for people to get used to? That this UI commonality was deemed good for the industry, allowing people to come up to speed on new applications relatively quickly? When this notion was ingrained enough that applications that had non-standard UIs were roundly panned? Well, that doesn't happen any more. Each application is its own special, precious social snowflake whose individualism must be nurtured and cherished. After all, who would ever think that a menuing system might need a common structure. Or that a standard location for a search box might be handly, if one needed to, say... maybe.. search for something? In any case, the web and mobile devices opened a plethora of new non-standards. Now you have to live with it. Have fun!

      Next, once the floodgates to random UI crap were flung open, flavors of the day started proliferating - many flavors, none of which were objectively better than the other. But they started getting used and extended. And God forbid that we reuse anything old in this industry. We should just hang up a shingle saying "Wheels re-invented here!" So UI folk have to use the newest, brightest, shiniest thing, because... USABILITY! At least for software developers the "because" for the wheel reinvention was "resume". Somehow I doubt tinting your widgets lime green does much for your career, though it may lead to pontificating blog posts and cushy consulting gigs should you hit the fashonista lottery and lime green turns out to be this year's new black.

      --
      That is all.
    9. Re:I kinda preferred the old GMail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've always used the html version. It loads much quicker when I'm up the end of the house where the wi-fi is patchy and the web2.0 version won't load.

  19. Can't make it any worse by Chelloveck · · Score: 1

    IMHO, they can't make it worse. I hate the Gmail interface. And even if they do somehow manage to make it less usable than it is now, I'll just continue to use a stand-alone email client via IMAP.

    --
    Chelloveck
    I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
    1. Re:Can't make it any worse by ThePhilips · · Score: 4, Informative

      Try Gmail "Basic HTML" interface. Missing things are: the chat history (can still be accessed via "in:chats" search) and easy selection of multiple items.

      Google has removed the link to activate it, so here it is.

      From the basic, if you do not like it, you can always switch back to the "normal" interface. Only switch to the basic is via this special link.

      Overall, works well for me. Definitely better than the mess they have made out of the GMail interface 2+ years ago.

      --
      All hope abandon ye who enter here.
  20. The issue with GMail by mgf64 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Aesthetics does not account for the lack of any way of contacting a Human should you come into trouble. A prettier GMAIL? Quite frankly, who gives a hoot? GMAIL is strutture in such a way as not to request "human labour", never. This makes it very, very frail and user support is, literally, non existing. If for any reason, you loose access to your account, you are basically fucked. Lessons learned: GMAIL is OK for basic throw/away don't care type of things. If you are using GMAIL professionally you are doing it wrong. First of all set the correct DNS records of a domain you own to point to a service, any service which allows you to set some name@yourdomain.tld. Should you not like the mail provider service, you can move your account where you like, and NEVER, EVER loose access to your mail account. First thing to check if you plan to use a service: is there a way to contact a human being? is there an actual phone number you can use to ask for assistance? If you can't contact them during sales phase, go someplace else.

    1. Re:The issue with GMail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are using GMAIL professionally you are doing it wrong.

      I agree if you are talking about free gmail. Gmail in apps for business is a different matter - you pay and you get support

    2. Re:The issue with GMail by mgf64 · · Score: 1

      If you are using GMAIL professionally you are doing it wrong.

      I agree if you are talking about free gmail. Gmail in apps for business is a different matter - you pay and you get support

      Problem is, unless you are a company with 20 users, you CAN'T call their phone number. This leaves single professionals, small shops and small enterprises out. If you can't call a phone number during SALES/Evaluation phase, don't trust that provider. Period.

  21. How about "Shit, no thanks" by frovingslosh · · Score: 2

    I'm still fighting with the last set of changes, lots of features that I used to use regularly are either gone or hidden so well that I usually can't find them. The best change they could make is go back to the version that worked and then let us keep it, or at least give us the option to keep it and not keep having changes forced down our throats.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  22. MY EYES!! Want skuemorphism back! by Billly+Gates · · Score: 4, Funny

    WHAT THE HELL.

    First they take my XP away with the best UI. Then take away my menus in office 2007 with ribbons. Then they cripple Youtube so I can't browse by category. Then take away the ok UI of Windows with Metro full screen and 70% of all the functionality. Then they change perfectly Gnome 2 with a half cell phone gnome 3/shell! Now office 365/office 2013 is all FREAKING WHITE IN ALL CAPS where I get a migraine looking at it. Then they change Hotmail.com to all blinding with blue. ,.. now gmail is changing too. GOOD lord. I have had enough. Stand up folks and let those elitist art professors know we will not tolerate this minimalism and reduction of features. Art majors are being brainwashed by these guys who go on to design websites and operating system GUI's who do not tolerate dissent and have never worked in real jobs before.

    They were assholes to post impressionist artists too back in the day because it wasn't the *new* thing. Now anything that doesn't look like it is 2 colors and non descriptive gets flunked out.

    We should not tolerate such things.

    1. Re:MY EYES!! Want skuemorphism back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean "they take my Windows 2000 away with the best UI" and replace it with the Fisher Price crap aka WinXP?

      See you in 10 years when you'll be praising Metro and the ribbon as best things since sliced bread.

    2. Re:MY EYES!! Want skuemorphism back! by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean "they take my Windows 2000 away with the best UI" and replace it with the Fisher Price crap aka WinXP?

      See you in 10 years when you'll be praising Metro and the ribbon as best things since sliced bread.

      Sadly at this rate I probably will as Word will resemble notepad today but with default autosaving and no features and all text. Shudder

    3. Re:MY EYES!! Want skuemorphism back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you stick the word "elitist" in front of "art professor" every single time you write it? We get it, you're a rube.

    4. Re:MY EYES!! Want skuemorphism back! by cavebison · · Score: 1

      Then they change perfectly Gnome 2 with a half cell phone gnome 3/shell! Now office 365/office 2013 is all FREAKING WHITE IN ALL CAPS where I get a migraine looking at it. Then they change Hotmail.com to all blinding with blue. ,.. now gmail is changing too.

      You forgot to mention the ever so popular UI changes to Visual Studio 2012/13. An utter UI train-wreck from MS, far worse in implication than Metro, as it is serious productivity s/ware used by Windows developers. And they haven't even backed down from using all-CAPS in the menus.

  23. Don't care. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haven't gone to the Gmail website for months, not since I've just setup Thunderbird.

  24. PGP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So when is PGP coming to gmail?

    1. Re:PGP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But how can Google data-mine your email if you encrypt it?

      Sorry, consumer #2890894451, but you may not have that feature.

      Unless, you know, you use an actual mail client on your own machine. But I'm sure they're working to destroy the interoperability with webmail so that people wanting to control their own computing experience and be ad-free are marginalized so far it becomes impractical.

    2. Re:PGP? by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      When they added POP3 and IMAP access, so a few years ago.

  25. Who knows by no-body · · Score: 2

    what they're up to again...

    The current Gmail interface was a step back in usability (for me).
    - wider line spacing, less emails to see
    - cannot click on emails to open in another tab
    - mailboxes are not visible - have to be clicked on to expand

    I always have a tab open with the "old" html version and get notified that I am missing out on something...
    The only thing on the current version I find better is the autorefresh to show new messages.
    One of my low priority projects is to get completely off Gmail - the NSL calamity...

    1. Re:Who knows by Nemyst · · Score: 1

      Huh?

      -Line spacing (and spacing in general) is controlled by the cozy/comfortable/compact options in the settings drop-down (the gear in the top right).
      -Ctrl+clicking opens emails in a new tab just fine. As a Slashdot grumpy old man, I'd hope you know your shortcut-fu!
      -"Mailboxes"? I assume you mean labels? You can select which ones show without having to click on "More" by going in the "Labels" settings page. There are a lot of controls there, even.

      I feel like people, when presented with a new interface, never try to even look at it before balking off. Just a bit of actually using the interface and trying its various features can be extremely beneficial and takes only a few minutes.

    2. Re:Who knows by no-body · · Score: 1

      Huh?

      -Line spacing (and spacing in general) is controlled by the cozy/comfortable/compact options in the settings drop-down (the gear in the top right).

      - Line spacing - run both versions in different tabs on the same browser and count the lines if you can and find the difference.

      -Ctrl+clicking opens emails in a new tab just fine. As a Slashdot grumpy old man, I'd hope you know your shortcut-fu!

      - Ctrl+clicking is more effort than mouse-over and right click, no other movement is needed on keyboard. As you may notice, to Ctrl+click you need both hands. Mouse-over right-click only one, therefore quicker. Any extra movement on a computer is repeated zillion times and one movement less is a zillion time less repetive movement.
      Many people working on computers have neck/shoulder/upper back issues from repeated unnatural use of their bodies. Mouse-shoulder higher, trapezius assymmetric, tighter on mouse-side etc.

      -"Mailboxes"? I assume you mean labels? You can select which ones show without having to click on "More" by going in the "Labels" settings page. There are a lot of controls there, even.

      With label selections on html, there is one scrollbar, on the current, there is a 2nd, the process to select a label is more complex and jumpy - second scrollbar, new orientation, point mouse on 2. scrollbar, then reorient. The interface is in control, the user has to follow. With one scrollbar, the user controls more.

      I feel like people, when presented with a new interface, never try to even look at it before balking off. Just a bit of actually using the interface and trying its various features can be extremely beneficial and takes only a few minutes.

      Yawn....

    3. Re:Who knows by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Ctrl+clicking opens emails in a new tab just fine. As a Slashdot grumpy old man, I'd hope you know your shortcut-fu!

      My shortcut-fu for many years had been middle-click on a link to open new tab, which is far more convenient than Ctrl+click (since that actually requires two hands). And that doesn't work.

  26. So don't use GMail by Animats · · Score: 1

    I don't use any Google account services. My mail goes to an IMAP server with spam filtering. The Linux desktop, the Windows 7 desktop, and the Windows laptop all run Thunderbird. The Android smartphone, which does not have a Google account, has an IMAP client. All devices sync mail through IMAP. Works fine.

    No ads. Who needs Google?

  27. This is a good thing! by xtal · · Score: 2

    It's so goddamn awful, it will drive me away from Gmail, its uncomplicated and great search results, and make me get off my lazy ass, and set up my own cloud service that I control.

    It might even make me motivated enough to limit my exposure to Google in other ways, too.

    The volume of non-work email I deal with has been dropping steadily, anyway - to the point where my own solution managed in my own cloud service might be worthwhile.

    I strongly suspect I am not alone.

    Full speed ahead Google!

    --
    ..don't panic
  28. pine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    gonna revert back to pine. and lynx, whilst I'm at it.

  29. As long as they let the classic be reachable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the URL I have bookmarked https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=html
    https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=html.

    It is the only way to have Gmail usable on a slower netbook. The totally arrogant new Google designers don't understand what made Google great. It was uncluttered and faster than AltaVista search, Yahoo and Hotmail.

    They messed up image search (unlimited scroll), does my old smartphone have unlimited memory???
    They messed up Google maps, all the lab features are gone like measuring the direct distance.

    Please Google, do no evil, leave the old interface available, preferably configurable. We don't need more eye-candy, we need functionality.

  30. Sidebar by Geeky · · Score: 2

    The sidebar is one of the most important features for me. I filter various emails to skip my inbox, so I like to see an unread count against the labels to know when I've got mail I might want to look at. I like to keep the inbox to the more important stuff, as that's the one I sync with my phone.

    I like the way the current gmail uses space as well - not too much whitespace. Email is a tool I use constantly - I don't need it to look good, I need it to be functional and have as much information as possible available at a glance. Site designs that are OK for casual browsing are not necessarily appropriate for real work and power users.

    Gmail was the first web interface that was good enough for me to replace a desktop client for PC use. I'd rather not go back, but that interface will have me switching, either back to a mail client or to outlook.com

    --
    Sigs are so 1990s. No way would I be seen dead with one.
  31. IMAP by Mozai · · Score: 1

    The only change they've made that bothered me was when Google Hangouts was integrated. Now when I use IMAPS to pick up my email, I get mismatches between the new message count and the actual number of unread messages in the Inbox; the "missing" unread messages are the short notes someone's sent to me via their fork of Jabber XMPP, which appear in the webmail interface but not in the IMAPS (and I would assume POP3S) interfaces.

    1. Re:IMAP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wait until google eliminates IMAP support, like they are going to eliminate XMPP from google voice pretty soon. It will happen sooner than you think!

  32. Who cares? Google spy's on you. Stop using them by marcgvky · · Score: 0

    The subject of my post sums it up.

  33. Grandma, it's not my fault! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    These types of changes make my 83 year old Grandmother very confused. They also make her angry. Do not make Grandma angry, because then she calls me and speaks to me in a voice I never want to hear. Does anyone have Larry Page's number?.

    Quite simply, she does not want her computing experience to change. None of the changes benefit her.

    And fwiw, very few changes benefit me. Recent versions of firefox are a disaster of forced changes.

  34. Won't someone think of the parents? by Nkwe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Please just have a profile option that says "Don't ever change anything on the interface", ever.

    If you move the blue button labeled "Compose" located in the upper left corner of the screen to the upper center of the screen, my dad won't be able to find it and he will call me and say his email is broken. If you change the color of the button, he will call me and tell me that email is broken. If you change the label from "Compose" to "New Email", he will call me and say his email is broken. If you pop up a great big dialog box on the middle of the screen that uses a bold blinking font and uses very noticeable colors, and this dialog box says "Welcome to the new mail interface, click here to learn about it.", my dad will somehow figure out how to close the dialog without reading it or the associated help and of course, he will think that email (or the Internet itself) is broken.

    No, I can't just teach my dad to be more flexible. Unlike other compatibility issues as technology progresses, I can not replace or "upgrade" my dad. He is 78 years old and is not into learning new tricks. He is a smart guy and is capable off learning new things, but he is old and crotchety and complains a lot every time he has to...

    Please please please remember that there is a segment of the user base that views even simple interface changes as a huge deal.

    1. Re:Won't someone think of the parents? by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      It's called a "local email client." Get one, like Thunderbird or Outlook, and teach him how to use it. It will never change unless you change it.

    2. Re:Won't someone think of the parents? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      It's called a "local email client." Get one, like Thunderbird or Outlook, and teach him how to use it. It will never change unless you change it.

      Tell you one thing.

      I will gladly switch to horrible Outlook (which I use just for the calendar and todo lists) if gmail goes this route. I already did with my older Hotmail account after the new anti skuemorphic minimalist design changed it online.

    3. Re:Won't someone think of the parents? by dotancohen · · Score: 1, Interesting

      How much online advertising has your dad clicked on in the past decade? In other words, your dad is for Gmail a leech, not a product for Gmails advertisers. They would be glad for him to switch.

      I firmly believe that the UI changes are designed to reduce our natural ability to mentally block out the advertisements on webpages. When the UI changes frequently, we must always examine the whole page (ads and all) to find what we need.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    4. Re:Won't someone think of the parents? by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      I hate to break it to you, but ... your dad is playing you. Think of it as payback for all the years of getting up at 3am to feed you a bottle and make you stop crying.

  35. At least they can't screw up the Android app by HangingChad · · Score: 1

    I've been trying to teach my dad how to use email on a tablet and the Android app is an exercise in frustration. It will present two different ways and dad gets confused. It's not like an interface that looks the same every time you approach it, so the less technically inclined can learn where the function buttons are located. It's a nightmare.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:At least they can't screw up the Android app by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Have you tried him on K-9 mail for Android?

    2. Re:At least they can't screw up the Android app by the_other_chewey · · Score: 1

      Have you tried him on K-9 mail for Android?

      While K-9 is a very nice client on a phone, it's awful on a larger tablet.
      The builtin one sucks too.

      It took me about a dozen tries to find the only Android mail client
      with a sensible tablet interface that lets you properly quote inline:
      The barely googleable K-@ Mail. I happily paid for the pro version.

  36. About time by dimeglio · · Score: 1

    I always found Gmail interface confusing. It's about time they made some change. Personally, I cannot imagine it possible to be worse so I'm anxious to get started with it.

    --
    Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the author.
    1. Re:About time by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Everytime I think a UI can't get any worse, the next version proves me wrong. I have confidence that Google will continue this trend.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  37. Bored at Google? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems to me Google just re invents stuff to be doing something. It used to be you only improved something when enough people demanded that it be changed.
    Now it seems with geeks its just a normal process because they believe change is always good. For me I stopped using Gmail a while back. Nothing struck me as being totally wrong, it was more the fact Google kept mucking up a good thing for the sake of change. I know some change comes without question. But I think change should come gradually and allow users to absorb that change in increments not leaps and bounds. Its very much like WIndows 8, which is a dramatic change for PC users but only new to tablet users. It makes a difference when you make changes vs presenting something new. A learning curve is more accepting on a new product, but hardly as accepting on a existing one. That's because users are familiar with how to navigate and use it. I think many tech people are way more accepting of change over the users that use the products. That's a bad disconnect when you don't see how your changes affect your average user. I think Microsoft has paid a price for not understanding how its users react to change. As one automotive designer said once. You can improve a knob or switch and customers won't complain. But do not move the switch and expect to not get push back.

  38. oh for fucks sake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go invent something new and quit dicking around with a basic utility.

  39. Can't touch this by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Since I use IMAP, none of this matters to me.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Can't touch this by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      [song joke]Our mail clients make us so hard, makes us say oh my FSM, thank you for blessing me with an e-mail client that follows RFC's [/song joke]

      Yeah, but only us nerds do it that way.

  40. let me guess by bfoot445 · · Score: 1

    let me guess, it integrates g+ in every single click. You can +1 on every single email.

  41. Why do people think SAAS is so great again? by epyT-R · · Score: 2

    Every time the ASP changes shit for changes sake, or nixes needed features altogether, any money saved initially goes right out the window. Outsourcing is not the answer, no matter what the PHBs think.

    How good would your car mechanic be if his tools were changed around, removed, added, altered every night before reporting for work the next day? Not very.

  42. Noooooooo!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Leave it the fuck alone you idiots. Less is more.

    PS. "Filter error: Too much repetition." ??!! -- Fuck Beta too.

  43. Sounds like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they're making it even slower and more bloated like Google Maps. The sad thing is that my college roommate works on it, and he had no idea it worked so poorly for most people because he has a brand new computer with gigabit Ethernet to their servers. He thought it worked fine. I showed how poorly it worked at an airport with a three year-old laptop, and he was genuinely surprised. Their employees just don't get it. It's great to have advanced features, but you need to have graceful automatic fallbacks for the masses. I looked through the web proxy logs here at work, and there are about three times as many hits to http://www.bing.com/maps/ as compared to http://www.google.com/maps/. Admittedly, our Internet connection sucks since it's a T1 for thirty people, but Google Maps is losing users.

  44. Leave it alone by jmv · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The thing that bothers me most with Google (not just Gmail, Android too) is the constant change in interface. I use the average app about 2-3 times between UI redesigns. I don't care how great the new UI is if it takes me more time to learn it than the time it's going to save until the next redesign. How about you make your new designs 3x better and update 1/3 as often? Seems like it would help the vast majority here.

  45. A wise man once said... by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    If it ain't broke, fix it till it is!

    No, wait, that was an idiot. An idiot said that.

    Sorry, Google. I like you, and I want to respect your decisions, but I got nothing.

  46. What about some real innovation! by aberglas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The bigger problem is all that the MBAs in charge do is twiddle with the tinsel, and do not address the deeper problems in semantics that people have asked for. Such as being able to break up mangled conversations. Or add notes to an important conversation to summarize it. Or to add a meaningful heading. There are several others.

    GMail used to be innovative. Hard core slash dotters will know that all sent mail belongs in one place only, namely a folder called Sent Mail. GMail introduced conversations to emails, producing threads (just like Usenet...). They also introduced the idea that the same email could be put in more than one folder (label) at the same time. So it could go in Sent Mail, CustomerX, ScalingIssues, and Outsanding all at the same time. Way beyond traditional IMAP.

    These things were not done as the result of some market research survey. They were done because the engineers involved thought it would be cool. It would be the way that they personally would like to use email.

    But that was before the MBA and user interface experts took over. Just change the window dressing, dumb things down, target the idiot user.

    I am actually looking to move to Zoho mail.

    As to slash dot, how about just recognizing blank lines as paragraph breaks. That would be enough.

    1. Re:What about some real innovation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you ask for innovation -- and when Google tries innovation, you denounce it and move to another e-mail service? What, are you part of that beta group or something?

    2. Re:What about some real innovation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Typical Slashdot, lob a generalized insult at all MBAs and get modded 4+...

    3. Re:What about some real innovation! by Robb+Swanson · · Score: 1

      Typical Slashdot, lob a generalized insult at all MBAs and get modded 4+...

      My last two years as an undergraduate, I put myself through school tutoring Math and Computer Science. By far, the most clueless students I had to deal with were the business students, as they almost all invariably stumbled their way through what was already a pretty dumbed-down Statistics class. MBA's get what they deserve here on Slashdot.

    4. Re:What about some real innovation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool but not useful. Reading long threads in gmail web is just so messy. Hard to tell who responded to whose e-mail...

  47. Just a formality by Tough+Love · · Score: 2

    Google traditionally copies all user feeback to the round file. They go through the motions getting user feedback to satisfy some well meaning internal guidelines, but in the end Google decides all questions by the colors on the powerpoint slides. Redesign of the news site is a classic example, tens of thousands of negative comments in multiple forums and nearly nothing good to say about it, in the end a few cosmetic tweaks were made but user feedback was overwhelmingly ignored. It still sucks. I expect pretty much the same with gmail. How about fixing things that actually matter, like not being able to right click and open a mail in a new browser tab?

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    1. Re:Just a formality by mcswell · · Score: 1

      I could sue you for plagiarism, those are almost my words. But...I suspect they were almost the words of tens of thousands of other (former) users of Google News. So instead, I'll say Amen, brother.

  48. Who is paying whom, and for what? by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

    Every business transaction requires a seller and a buyer, an item and a payment. Are you paying Google for your Gmail? Thought not; neither am I. So if we're not the buyers, and we're not selling anything, and we aren't the payment, then we must be the item being sold Each of us is another pair of eyes to look at advertisements. It's such a clever business model - so much simpler than television or magazines, with no need to produce entertainment in any form; no need to expend money producing *anything*. The user base comes to the site to read the emails that the user base itself is sending each other, and all Gmail has to do is store it. And the typical email is nowhere near as expensive to store and transmit as, say, a user video on Youtube. Not to mention the useful information and metadata that the user base is happy to enter in their contact lists and status updates.

    1. Re:Who is paying whom, and for what? by Geeky · · Score: 1

      Google apps users are paying google, per mailbox, for email, and are most likely to be affected by this as businesses using it may have users who are less technically adept and need training on every new interface.

      --
      Sigs are so 1990s. No way would I be seen dead with one.
  49. keep your knickers on folks by zr · · Score: 1

    i'm no fan of google but for once i'm going to stand on their side, they're doing it right, they had an idea, they are TESTING it, and if it doesnt pan out, it'll find its way to Sto'Vo'Kor. thats how it SHOULD be.

    PS. i really wish microsoft had tested the ribbon the same way.. oh well, its too late now..

  50. The root of all evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    From theverge article:

    The redesign matches a test layout revealed last month by Geek.com for mobile web access.

    And therein lies the problem, I believe.

    Captcha: persist

  51. New feature by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    and there's a new feature called 'reminders'

    What's that do, then?

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    1. Re:New feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I forget

  52. Re:You still check email through a browser??? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    You do know that even evil gmail has a pop3 and imap access option for free, right?

    You do know a lot of people find it far more convenient to use the browser, right? People with multiple devices, for instance? People who, say, travel a lot and find themselves using computers in hotels, libraries, foreign offices?

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  53. please prove this new software improves efficiency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What they're doing now is trying to justify their place within the company while making statements that "people want change, and change is good." While making simple things more difficult to accomplish and trying to justify it as even easier.

    Software buyers need to start being more picky. If they say the new software is better, ask them to prove it: 'how long does it take to write a 10 page letter with your new version? how long with old version?". Ask them how much new version will increase productivity.

    Ask if new version has user interface changes. Ask how much re-training is needed for an average user to reach same level of productivity with new software.

    Ask for software license contract to contain bonuses based on productivity of new software. And if users are less productive, software vendor pays penalties under contract.

    If new software is easy to learn and use, vendor gets bonuses in contract. If retraining takes too long and costs too much, vendor pays penalties.

    Software buyers need to stop buying any crap software vendors will shovel into your computers! Demand new versions that are better, and will improve your business!

  54. Re:You still check email through a browser??? by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

    You do know a lot of people find it far more convenient to use the browser, right? People with multiple devices, for instance?

    The default Android mail client supports proper IMAP, I think the iOS one does too.

    People who, say, travel a lot and find themselves using computers in hotels, libraries, foreign offices?

    They trust those computers enough to not bring their own laptop, or even a tablet along?

  55. Re:You still check email through a browser??? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    The default Android mail client supports proper IMAP, I think the iOS one does too.

    So? That doesn't negate the convenience of webmail.

    They trust those computers enough to not bring their own laptop, or even a tablet along?

    I didn't say or imply that, either.

    Astonishingly enough, there are people who have different mental weightings for convenience versus security than you.

    If it was at someone else's office/home, I'd have very few qualms about logging into Gmail, etc, on one of their computers to save me the trouble of powering up my laptop and negotiating for the password to their wi-fi.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  56. Want to redesign it? get out of our email by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

    Want to redesign it get out of our email. Make a paid version 100% free of Advertising and of Your spying. And 100% inaccessible to anyone else but the Customer.

    --
    Jack of all trades,master of none
    1. Re:Want to redesign it? get out of our email by Flavianoep · · Score: 1

      I second that.

      --
      Linux is for people who don't mind RTFM.
  57. I'm sick of minimalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every time google changes gmail it's not for the better in my opinion. I'm sick of having to train myself to identify which glyphs are hiding the dozen features that used to be obvious. Eventually they'll have one single button that will have to interpret the intent and emotion of your click to know whether you want to send an email or use italic font..

  58. Any UI with menus or more than two buttons ... by hochl · · Score: 1

    ... must be dumbed down so that even a 3 year old or a top manager can use it!

  59. If it ain't broke... break it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess I should reserve judgment, but the last few apps Google have changed have gotten worse. Maps on the desktop is far less useable than it used to be, although the mobile version is not too bad. However, I don't understand why certain features don't exist in one version or the other instead of being in both, and other features just got hidden away by the redesigns. The Android camera is an app that got definitely worse. The UI isn't that bad, but Google forced the photo aspect ratio down to standard photo sizes, even though most people were happy with screen sized photos, and it now has more quirks and crashes more than the old app. Having your camera app crash or not respond when you want to take a photo is something that should absolutely never happen, Google shouldn't be forcing beta testing of their apps onto Android phone users. I have a Nexus 5, so it boggles the mind that even on their own flagship phone they can't make a camera app that doesn't crash.

    I wish Google would stop experimenting so much with apps that are absolutely core to most users (mail, camera, map, browser) and put out a special beta version for them so people can try them out, like with Chrome on Android. Oh yeah, and actually listen to user feedback.

  60. Outlook.com by BrinkeGuthrie · · Score: 1

    Outstanding. Clean, lean, and -no- clutter. Gmail is too bloaty.

  61. Again? by scarboni888 · · Score: 0

    Wasn't gmail already re-designed at some point since it debuted?

    Maybe if Google quite wasting so much money on development they wouldn't need to sell our personal information to so many advertisers?

    I'm thinking it's great opportunity to reduce the amount of evil committed.

  62. Message overlay by phorm · · Score: 1

    The only change I really hate is the "Compose Message" overlay (where it loads in a Div on top of your Inbox).
    It breaks on certain older browsers, and I've had it do weird things even on some newer ones.

  63. Good-bye Gmail - we hardly knew you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it ends up as "useful" as Google-maps, Yahoo will be *very* thankful.....

  64. Sounds stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last time Yahoo changed their e-mail format, it was terrible . I wonder at times who runs the likes of Yahoo, Flicker and I'm sure now Google - escapees from a mental institution :-)

  65. i haven't recovered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    from the last redesign

  66. Please dear god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just give an option to keep the old interface. If I have to retrain aging parents on gmail again I might shoot myself.

  67. Is this why I am getting spurious errors on gmail? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For a week and a half I have been seeing "Failed to retrieve mail" from external accountName.

    But I send email to that account and it shows up immediately.

    Are all the engineers working on a cool new interface and, consequently, letting the current one fall to pieces?

    As luck would have it, this coincides with the weekend that this ISP replaced my 16 year old modem with a new modem/router (I assume with hardware and firmware modified by the NSA to make listening in easier and more transparent, ie, less apparent) so I wasted 45 minutes on the phone today and a similar time slice last week on their internet chat UI trying to get a CSR to help me. 45 minutes to run passwd a couple times, maybe a third of that on hold.

    "Please tell me the password you want" and "Allow us to remotely control your computer to verify you are successfully using gmail to read your mail" were just 2 of the silliest requests I had to refuse the poor bastard today.

    I was much nicer than I wanted to, maybe because on some level I knew that my mail was working fine? I don't know.

    Someone remind me - how do we get access to the NSA file backups of our iTunes accounts, etc?