"This is patently not true: I have only returned items that were defective, in complete accordance with their policies. I was not trying to game the system, I was not trying to get things for free - I just wanted products that worked properly, and if they didn't, they went back."
Ummm, a Kindle book is an ebook. How can it be defective?
Then later, he says he's never returned a Kindle book. He's returned other things, but not Kindle books. So they banned him from the Amazon Kindle.
I think that this guy is yanking our chain. Some customers are never satisfied, and they should be just cut loose ASAP.
Intoxicating enemas are the next big thing. The human colon is 5 times more efficient at absorbing alcohol than the stomach, meaning that it takes less alcohol to get you drunker, faster. Because there are many fewer tastebuds in the colon than in the mouth, the quality of the alcohol is less of an issue. Most bars need stock only two fluid consumable items - everclear and saline for dilution. Compare this to a typical bar with hundreds of wines, beers, sodas, juices, mixers, spices, liquors, and lickers.
The typical establishment would look very much like existing bars, and in most cases could be fitted into the existing bar areas. The major difference is in the seating. A typical bar has the seats arranged so that the customer is in a heads-up face-forward toward the bartender position. In an intoxicating enema bar, that is nearly reversed. The best seating position is head-down, ass-up, facing AWAY from the bartender. This is the most efficient position for the bartender to access the customers' asses.
Michal Grzes, a conservative councillor in the city of Poznan in western Poland, said, "We didn't pay 37 million zlotys (7.6 million pounds) for the largest elephant house in Europe to have a gay elephant live there. We were only paying for a large, delicious looking elephant cock, not attached to an actual elephant. We were hoping to graft the elephant cock onto a young citizen of our gay city of Poznan, as a tourist attraction. Polish men would have visited our city endlessly to see a beautiful elephant cock grafted onto a young boy. But now, our plans our ruined. We fear that with the money we have wasted on this now useless elephant cock, we will only be able to rescue things by acquiring a horse cock from a zoo in Belarus. The best horse cock comes from Belarus, but Polish men like Belorussian horse cock well enough."
That quote should be more accurate. Michal Grzes would be horrified if he were portrayed as someone who doesn't enjoy elephant cock.
Exactly. I just did a search for "cock" and found a pile of excellent materials on Amazon.
What's the fucking problem that people have? Sales ranking? Does that dildo really feel that much better in your asshole when you know it's the North American dildo sales leader?
My car dealer did something similar to me. They never had an email address for me, but one day they sent me an email about my car which I have serviced there.
The problem is that it came to "cuntlicker@.com"
I called them up and asked them where they got the address. Turns out they hired people to try to link harvested addresses to their customer list, and so they fucked up in that way.
I had to call them THREE times and threaten to take my business elsewhere before they got my real mail address correct. I gave them quite a lecture about how they got ripped off by these mailing list harvesters.
Wait, I thought they delivered a huge pile of documentation of their nuclear activities that GW Bush asked for, before the invasion.
The GW Bush said "it's all lies" and invaded.
Then, GW Bush said "oops! guess that sucker wasn't lying!" after we invaded and found that Iraq's statements about everything related to their nuclear program were true, as presented in the disclosure before the war.
They hadn't been able to do anything much since the first Gulf war, because of the impact of the embargo.
I'm thinking that we're not getting our money's worth out of the CIA if we can fuck up that badly on an intelligence operation.
I *hope* it takes a nuclear 9/11 to wake us up. Because if there hasn't been a nuclear 9/11, that means the USA struck first. And that's not something we should do.
If we decide to not build certain windmills in certain areas because terrorists might take them out, then what's the difference?
In either case, it's terrorists stopping windmills from operating in specific areas.
Any time you make decisions based on what terrorists might do, then they are affecting and manipulating our behavior, and they are winning.
But to answer your question - how will terrorist take out a broad swath of these offshort windmills? Isn't that inefficient? What kind of resources would YOU need to do that, especially when your foe is the US Navy?
No, the terrorist movie plot scare scenario doesn't make sense. A terrorist would be far more productive if he just spent $500 on a good rifle and did something like this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beltway_sniper_attacks
It's a crappy measure of media bias. Media Bias is a rhetorical and framing bias, not a citation bias. That's the problem.
Note: I'm not aware of any studies which indicate magnitude or direction of rhetorical bias. I am just specifying the category which media bias falls into. If you want to measure media bias, you need to figure out how to measure framing bias.
Let's get these stories out of the way. April 1st is the worst day of the year for Slashdot. And that's saying a lot because none of them are particularly any good.
The headline would be "Obama's unfair economic policies interfere with right of participation in the unemployment olympics." Brit Hume reporting, Glenn Beck crying.
Slashdot Mirror
From TFA:
"This is patently not true: I have only returned items that were defective, in complete accordance with their policies. I was not trying to game the system, I was not trying to get things for free - I just wanted products that worked properly, and if they didn't, they went back."
Ummm, a Kindle book is an ebook. How can it be defective?
Then later, he says he's never returned a Kindle book. He's returned other things, but not Kindle books. So they banned him from the Amazon Kindle.
I think that this guy is yanking our chain. Some customers are never satisfied, and they should be just cut loose ASAP.
Intoxicating enemas are the next big thing. The human colon is 5 times more efficient at absorbing alcohol than the stomach, meaning that it takes less alcohol to get you drunker, faster. Because there are many fewer tastebuds in the colon than in the mouth, the quality of the alcohol is less of an issue. Most bars need stock only two fluid consumable items - everclear and saline for dilution. Compare this to a typical bar with hundreds of wines, beers, sodas, juices, mixers, spices, liquors, and lickers.
The typical establishment would look very much like existing bars, and in most cases could be fitted into the existing bar areas. The major difference is in the seating. A typical bar has the seats arranged so that the customer is in a heads-up face-forward toward the bartender position. In an intoxicating enema bar, that is nearly reversed. The best seating position is head-down, ass-up, facing AWAY from the bartender. This is the most efficient position for the bartender to access the customers' asses.
My tomatoes don't last two weeks before the squirrels get them. That's OK, because squirrels are also delicious if you trap them yourself.
Suspicious looking picture on this article:
http://www.buzzfeed.com/peggy/tree-grows-in-mans-lung
Michal Grzes, a conservative councillor in the city of Poznan in western Poland, said, "We didn't pay 37 million zlotys (7.6 million pounds) for the largest elephant house in Europe to have a gay elephant live there. We were only paying for a large, delicious looking elephant cock, not attached to an actual elephant. We were hoping to graft the elephant cock onto a young citizen of our gay city of Poznan, as a tourist attraction. Polish men would have visited our city endlessly to see a beautiful elephant cock grafted onto a young boy. But now, our plans our ruined. We fear that with the money we have wasted on this now useless elephant cock, we will only be able to rescue things by acquiring a horse cock from a zoo in Belarus. The best horse cock comes from Belarus, but Polish men like Belorussian horse cock well enough."
That quote should be more accurate. Michal Grzes would be horrified if he were portrayed as someone who doesn't enjoy elephant cock.
I may have to devise an experimental series. My uninformed judgement may have been hasty.
Driving is not democracy. Do not confuse the two. Do not ask questions of me as if I am confusing the two. I am not stupid.
Exactly. I just did a search for "cock" and found a pile of excellent materials on Amazon.
What's the fucking problem that people have? Sales ranking? Does that dildo really feel that much better in your asshole when you know it's the North American dildo sales leader?
Crypto is not democracy. Do not confuse the two. Do not ask questions as if I am confusing the two. I am not stupid.
My car dealer did something similar to me. They never had an email address for me, but one day they sent me an email about my car which I have serviced there.
The problem is that it came to "cuntlicker@.com"
I called them up and asked them where they got the address. Turns out they hired people to try to link harvested addresses to their customer list, and so they fucked up in that way.
I had to call them THREE times and threaten to take my business elsewhere before they got my real mail address correct. I gave them quite a lecture about how they got ripped off by these mailing list harvesters.
You DO need to. The reason democracy works is because people believe in it, see it work, and can understand it.
Things you believe in that you can't understand and can't see work are called RELIGIONS.
Who cares about DC. As far as this post goes, not very cost effective. You're the only one who bit so far.
Anyway, to make this slight less trolltacular:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HVDC
If they had just gone with Edison's DC instead of that dope Tesla's AC, this would not be a problem.
Besides, AC is far more dangerous than DC. There's a reason why they use it in electric chairs.
Now let's see, who disagrees with me?
Wait, I thought they delivered a huge pile of documentation of their nuclear activities that GW Bush asked for, before the invasion.
The GW Bush said "it's all lies" and invaded.
Then, GW Bush said "oops! guess that sucker wasn't lying!" after we invaded and found that Iraq's statements about everything related to their nuclear program were true, as presented in the disclosure before the war.
They hadn't been able to do anything much since the first Gulf war, because of the impact of the embargo.
I'm thinking that we're not getting our money's worth out of the CIA if we can fuck up that badly on an intelligence operation.
I *hope* it takes a nuclear 9/11 to wake us up. Because if there hasn't been a nuclear 9/11, that means the USA struck first. And that's not something we should do.
If we decide to not build certain windmills in certain areas because terrorists might take them out, then what's the difference?
In either case, it's terrorists stopping windmills from operating in specific areas.
Any time you make decisions based on what terrorists might do, then they are affecting and manipulating our behavior, and they are winning.
But to answer your question - how will terrorist take out a broad swath of these offshort windmills? Isn't that inefficient? What kind of resources would YOU need to do that, especially when your foe is the US Navy?
No, the terrorist movie plot scare scenario doesn't make sense. A terrorist would be far more productive if he just spent $500 on a good rifle and did something like this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beltway_sniper_attacks
Yes, but there are no ethical rules against watching your two lab robots fuck each other.
Guantanamo said that it had a "lot of fun" in Miss Universe!
My user name wasn't stolen, it was plagarized. Stolen means that the rightful owner no longer has use of the property that was stolen.
Cool, let's fuck.
So why do you think I'm an idiot?
It's a crappy measure of media bias. Media Bias is a rhetorical and framing bias, not a citation bias. That's the problem.
Note: I'm not aware of any studies which indicate magnitude or direction of rhetorical bias. I am just specifying the category which media bias falls into. If you want to measure media bias, you need to figure out how to measure framing bias.
Let's get these stories out of the way. April 1st is the worst day of the year for Slashdot. And that's saying a lot because none of them are particularly any good.
The headline would be "Obama's unfair economic policies interfere with right of participation in the unemployment olympics." Brit Hume reporting, Glenn Beck crying.
Who do you think you are, the signature Mussolini?