Fine. Co-founder, co-song writer, co-lead on a number of songs (Hungry Wolf, We're Desperate, The New World, True Love, I Must Not Think Bad Thoughts).
The scene where two potential clients overhear lawyer Oliver Platt berate Woody Harrelson for agreeing to let Robert Redford sleep with wife Demi Moore for $1 million. He soon makes it clear that his anger is at being left out of the process. He would have negotiated alot more then that.
Afterwards, they two eavesdroppers announce that he's just the kind of lawyer they're looking for.
John Doe is the former lead singer of the Los Angeles punk band X, and has acted in the movies "Great Balls of Fire" and "Roadhouse" and the tv show "Roswell".
Now I remember the name. When Bill Wyman was 47, he started dating/doing a 13 year old girl named Mandy Smith. Six years later, when she was all of 19 and he as a robust 53, they got married. For some reason, the marriage didn't last.
Wait, let me rephrase: When Bill Wyman was 47, he started dating/doing a 13 year old girl.
Oh, That's the reputation that his lawyer is trying to protect.
Amusing sidenote: Bill's 31 year old son Steven started dating Mandy's 46 year old mother Patsy and at one point planned to marry her. (This is after Bill/Mandy's divorce). Still, it would have made Steven his own divorced step-grandfather.
aforethought named him Bill Wyman, recognizing that it would be a vaguely semi-cool bassist sort of a name, though they knew at birth that their son was not genetically predisposed to be musically inclined (other then writing about it), and fully realizing that this would impair and confuse the reputation of a future musician who would be adopt the name as his own years after their son had been born.
First, you're right in that it came into effect on 11/06/02. So any contributions made before then to influence the decision would not have been covered.
And, considering the large number of endruns around the CFA have already been reported on, I'm quite sure that no politician needs limit him/herself to being bought for only $5K.
Plus, you're missing the real point. Powell isn't an elected official. He is a Republican party member however, who has continued to reward through action and/or inaction large contributors to the party. I'm not suggesting personal greed. I'm stating political loyalty/ethical vacuum.
Chairman Michael Powell says: The benefits of this transaction are considerable, the potential harms negligible.
What he's really saying:
The benefits to Comcast are considerable, the potential harms to the users are not a consideration because their political donations aren't as large as Comcast's, now are they.
Thank you very much. But assuming all of that is the case, we're left with the big puzzler: what has changed so that they suddenly feel comfortable re-releasing it under the GPL/LGPL?
Since they are planning it now, I was wondering if there were reasons they had avoided it up until now.
Other posts suggest that they were trying to restrict the introduction of a) gambling software and b) code that would allow the pirating of current arcade games. They further suggest that this was done to avoid legal complications on this program. This all begs the question: what has changed that they feel comfortable GPL'ing it now?
Why was it not under the GPL to begin with?
on
MAME To Become GPL?
·
· Score: 1
Was there any reason why it was started with the other license scheme? Are there any unique reasons why it should not be GPL'd?
My first two homes were built with bubble gum, twine and soft twigs. Until they sank into the swamp. My third home added moss and it's still here tod... wait, it's sinking into the swamp. Lichens. That's what it needs!
Slashdot Mirror
Of course, what the Dutch equivalent is, I couldn't tell you.
gruntled?
In the voice of Homer:
Mmmmm, bacteria.
Mmmmm, kitten.
Mmmmm, teenager.
With aloe vera, of course.
Also, it isn't cynicism, it's experience that says that Windows guarantees a security risk. It's an intrinsically unstable, risky platform.
So the bashing was hardly gratuitous.
Not to mention Windows own unique security flaws.
A non-Windows system is not a guarantee of invulnerability, but keeping a Windows system is guaranteed to put you at risk.
The real world seems to agree with him on these.
No Pain, No Gain!
Feel the burn!
Be the burn!
Fine. Co-founder, co-song writer, co-lead on a number of songs (Hungry Wolf, We're Desperate, The New World, True Love, I Must Not Think Bad Thoughts).
Afterwards, they two eavesdroppers announce that he's just the kind of lawyer they're looking for.
He'll sue you for sure.
Wait, let me rephrase: When Bill Wyman was 47, he started dating/doing a 13 year old girl.
Oh, That's the reputation that his lawyer is trying to protect.
Amusing sidenote: Bill's 31 year old son Steven started dating Mandy's 46 year old mother Patsy and at one point planned to marry her. (This is after Bill/Mandy's divorce). Still, it would have made Steven his own divorced step-grandfather.
Is that an accurate description?
Until the people from MAME announce their reasoning themselves, the issue is unsettled, but these possibilities don't seem to be left field. Thanks.
From the people who brought you DVD Copy Plus
And, considering the large number of endruns around the CFA have already been reported on, I'm quite sure that no politician needs limit him/herself to being bought for only $5K.
Plus, you're missing the real point. Powell isn't an elected official. He is a Republican party member however, who has continued to reward through action and/or inaction large contributors to the party. I'm not suggesting personal greed. I'm stating political loyalty/ethical vacuum.
Michael Powell, son of Colin Powell, is the chairman of the FCC, the government agency that is supposed to be regulating this field. supposed to be.
More angry and frustrated.
What he's really saying:
The benefits to Comcast are considerable, the potential harms to the users are not a consideration because their political donations aren't as large as Comcast's, now are they.
Thank you very much. But assuming all of that is the case, we're left with the big puzzler: what has changed so that they suddenly feel comfortable re-releasing it under the GPL/LGPL?
If versions 0.22 through 0.26 were under the GPL, why was it removed from under the GPL for versions 0.27 through 0.61?
Since they are planning it now, I was wondering if there were reasons they had avoided it up until now.
Other posts suggest that they were trying to restrict the introduction of a) gambling software and b) code that would allow the pirating of current arcade games. They further suggest that this was done to avoid legal complications on this program. This all begs the question: what has changed that they feel comfortable GPL'ing it now?
Was there any reason why it was started with the other license scheme? Are there any unique reasons why it should not be GPL'd?
My first two homes were built with bubble gum, twine and soft twigs. Until they sank into the swamp. My third home added moss and it's still here tod ... wait, it's sinking into the swamp. Lichens. That's what it needs!