Slashdot Mirror


User: surprise_audit

surprise_audit's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
1,966
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 1,966

  1. Re:The Russian court has got see reason, here. on Astrologer Sues NASA Over Comet Probe · · Score: 1
    Am I right in thinking that Astrological predictions are based on star charts that are several thousands of years old?? I think I read that somewhere, but it may not be accurate. If it is, why would anyone believe that predictions based on several-thousand-year-old charts would be in any way accurate?? Why would the positions of the stars 2,000 years ago have any affect on, for example, my personal life next week??

    Perhaps of more importance, how does the discovery of many more stars, planets and galaxies fuck up those charts??

  2. Re:The Russian court has got see reason, here. on Astrologer Sues NASA Over Comet Probe · · Score: 1
    I'd say, put the fish back, but put it in a relatively inaccessible place, like maybe in the middle of the roof. Then wire it up to something like a tazer. If someone has to go out of their way to reach it and pull it off, make it worth the effort...

    Disclaimer: probably illegal in most states, but who make a complaint when they'd have to incriminate themselves to do so??

  3. Re:Well, he's got precedent... on Owner of the Word Stealth 'Protecting' Rights · · Score: 1

    Forget picking on the rest of the world, this idiot is picking on the Military. There are plenty of stealth organizations in various different country's that could make him disappear if he got up their collective noses...

  4. Re:He's taking on on Owner of the Word Stealth 'Protecting' Rights · · Score: 1

    No, that's apparently a quote from the TTABlog, which may be directly quoting the original letter.

  5. Re:But... on Owner of the Word Stealth 'Protecting' Rights · · Score: 2, Informative
    Not just an asshole, but a crackhead too. Here's a few other "Famous Trademarks" watched over by Rentamark:

    • Sentra
    • Intruder
    • Stradivarius
    • Turbojet
    • Checkmate
    • Airframe Fable
    • Torrent
    • Aerospace
    • Star Light
    • Terminator
    • Ambush
    I bet they don't try to enforce "Ambush", though - military forces all over the world must have substantially more firepower than any vexatious litigator. Should be interesting watching him track down any number of terrorists (sorry, "freedom fighters") that "ambush" occupation forces and innocent civilians.

    BTW: the Famous Marks page looks like real crap. Some images don't load and the ones that do look like a four-year-old got loose with a paintbox

  6. Re:Cars aren't the issue on Britain to Pilot GPS Speed Governors · · Score: 1

    Now *that* depends on how much you've been drinking - mt reaction time is much better after a couple of beers.

  7. Re:We Need this in the US on Britain to Pilot GPS Speed Governors · · Score: 1

    Seems that way to me too. The road running near my house is single-lane each way, rated at 50mph. A couple of miles south there's a cross street that's two lanes each way, rated at 40mph. The slower road has fewer stop signs and lights than the faster road, and about the same number of neighborhood entrances. There's no obvious reason for the better road to be marked slower.

  8. Re:This is good but should go farther on BBC Offers Beethoven Symphonies for Download · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No, I'd say you'd have ten copies that you yourself could listen to over the next 7 days...

  9. Re:And then... on Cheap to Audiophile with Simple Hacks · · Score: 1
    Better yet, start off with two identical players and do the double-blind test *before* modding either of them. You'd still want to tell the test subjects that one player is enhanced, and ask them to pick which one.

    After the modding, run the same test and see if the test subjects still pick the same player as their favourite.

  10. Re:Supreme Court Sucks on Justice O'Connor Retiring · · Score: 1

    Isn't it not so much banning Burning, as banning Desecration of the flag?? In which case, this guy is gonna be in trouble...

  11. Re:I can't wait to watch the fireworks. on Justice O'Connor Retiring · · Score: 1

    Does the "the advise and consent" clause include any kind of retribution if the President decides to totally ignore the advice and do what he damn well pleases?? Impeachment, maybe??

  12. Re:Opening Line on Perl's Chip Salzenberg Sued, Home Raided · · Score: 1

    On the other hand, if what Chip says about their illegal practices is accurate, you'd think the company lawyers would have wanted to keep things quiet. At least until a sanitized version of the source code could be worked up...

  13. Re:Missing Something! on Perl's Chip Salzenberg Sued, Home Raided · · Score: 1
    Given what Chuck's accusing the company of, I'm surprised they'd be so apparently willing to let it be dragged into court. It doesn't really matter whether he has the money for a long legal battle, once those accusations become general knowledge, the company is going to face some tough questions from people that can shut them down.

    Yes, it's a crying shame that Chuck's being victimised, and I'm not in any way condoning that. I'm just pointing out that the company have screwed *themselves* over by making such a big fuss. That letter names names - both the principal offenders *and* several victims (Washington State & Montana) and hopefully that's a juggernaut that will roll right over HMS and grind them flat.

  14. Re:Am I missing something? on Perl's Chip Salzenberg Sued, Home Raided · · Score: 1
    blockquote> We'll see if any of the computers come back formatted.

    Formatting may be the least of his problems. If they really want to screw him over, they'll "find" something nasty, like kiddie pr0n, and he won't be able to prove it was put there *after* the computers left his control.

  15. Re:how to die on Grizzly-sized Catfish Caught in Thailand · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You know, you just have to wonder, what is it about that river that makes it home to more species of giant fish than any other river ?? And is it actually safe to eat these monster fish??

  16. Re:And the important question is on David Clark: Rebuild the Internet · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Remember that famous quote about the Internet treating a nuclear strike as routing errors and simply routing around it?? The same applies here - if US control of the root DNS becomes a problem to the rest of the world, expect the rest of the world to set up their own root servers and then the US-controlled Internet becomes an Intranet that may or may not have visibility to the rest of the world.

  17. Re:what exactly google does to stop fraud? on Google Sued Over Click Fraud · · Score: 1

    So you don't think the zombie network owners would be interested in making a few bucks by running "click fraud" campaigns?? I'm thinking specifically of the zombie networks owned by mass mailers - what they're doing isn't all that different, really...

  18. Re:IMHO on Google Sued Over Click Fraud · · Score: 1

    Right on! You might as well try to sue the President for "failing to prevent terrorism", or Boeing for "failing to prevent people hijacking airplanes"...

  19. Re:Failing to prevent? on Google Sued Over Click Fraud · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Does Sears actually do any business in a country more sue-happy than America?? Come to think of it, *is* there a country more sue-happy than America??

  20. Re:what exactly google does to stop fraud? on Google Sued Over Click Fraud · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Somebody with access to a large collection of zombie PCs wouldn't even all be coming from the same subnets/networks.

    I'd imagine that one trick to combat such would be to "rate" the attractiveness of the ad - i.e. Google staff acting as an "average Joe" looking at the ad and estimating how attractive it is as a guide to how often they'd expect it to be clicked. Any ad getting *much* higher traffic should be looked at more closely to see if: a) they underestimated it; b) it's a "click fraud" target.

  21. Re:wait... on Google Sued Over Click Fraud · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yeah. That was what was being referred to in the Interesting turnaround link right at the end of the summary....

  22. Re:Wont work on Vein Patterns to Verify Identity · · Score: 1

    Forget blood flow - according to TFA it's reading the vein pattern in infrared, so unless the hand is really, really fresh, it ain't gonna have the same print. Just keeping it warm won't work, because that'll be warm-all-over, not a warm-vein-pattern. I suppose the would-be hand-thief could drag along one of those artificial heart machines and hook it up to the severed wrist, but even that would be difficult to get right...

  23. Re:Don't get me wrong... on Knoppix 4.0 DVD - Like a Kid in a Candy Store · · Score: 1

    That's why I'm happy that work finally provided me with a nice, shiny, new Precision M60 laptop last year. It came with this mandate: "take this thing home - do not leave it on your desk at night". They even provided a rather nice backpack to carry it in.

  24. Re:Well... on Supreme Court Rules against Grokster · · Score: 1

    That'll never happen, or if it does, it'll get reversed real quick. Windows File Share allows searching a shared filesystem on the remote computer, does it not?? I'm sure Microsoft will lean on anyone prosecuting based on "silent promotion".

  25. Re:Apathetic Pubilc on Supreme Court Rules against Grokster · · Score: 1
    Being on the right side of things doesnt matter anymore.

    That's true right up until a significant number of voters are"detained". Every election, a number of politicians win or lose with a relatively small margin. If they started seeing large numbers of voters being "detained" in their constituencies, enough voters to swing their particular one way or the other, then you can expect to see some kind of action.

    This is how "grass roots" campaigns get results - get a bunch of people riled up about something and politicians fall over themselves to grab the votes those people represent. Sure, they love the money they get for protecting corporate interests, but without the popular vote, they don't get the money or the power.