Slashdot Mirror


User: Disevidence

Disevidence's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
404
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 404

  1. This is not exactly new on Some Spammer Has a Crush on You · · Score: 1

    This has been out for a while. I recall getting a few emails to my hotmail account about hmm 1 and a half years ago. When you check the website, it says you had to pay to find out who.

    Not new, and not a big deal. If someone really liked you, they could actually tell you, though this is slashdot.

    Spam is not worth your time to be read.

  2. Re:water intoxication on The Golden Age of Cup Manufacturing · · Score: 1

    Sort of. Most ecstasy overdoses have to do with the drug being tainted with "Death", a molecule like ecstasy with a hydroxyl group (i think). It aborts the thermal processes of the body, so the people taking ecstasy drink lots of water to try and cool down.

    Useless shit, unless you take ecstasy frequently.

  3. Re:Playing Devil's Advocate on Starving Nation Turns Down Bioengineered Corn · · Score: 1

    No you misunderstand. Yes everyone pays for their food, but why should they have to pay certain companies for the food.

    Sure everyone has a supplier, and they have to get the seeds and food to be grown from somewhere. When the food you grown is in the debt of a corporation, who knows that hoops you'll have to jump through to be able to market that food, or what amounts of money you'll have to pay to that company.

    I should be able to buy a sack of seeds/corn from somewhere, and plant it to grow my own food. When your unsure whether the food your growing is owned by another company (or the design of it), what trust do you have in the system.

    Think of it in terms with a monopoly. If the corporations manage to get every farmer in the world to grow GE foods, then there will be a sort or corporate ownership, or a cabal or groups "owning" the food supply of the world. As shown before, food is the most valuable commodity in wars.

    I guess im just to idealistic. Thanks for your response.

  4. Re:Slashdot misses the point on Starving Nation Turns Down Bioengineered Corn · · Score: 1

    Im not suggesting they give their food away for free, rather sell it in their own internal market rather than to europe. Of course, im willing to bet that they won't get as much money selling it internally as they do externally, so thats another major point of issue.

  5. Re:Playing Devil's Advocate on Starving Nation Turns Down Bioengineered Corn · · Score: 1

    I wasn't talking about Zimbabwe in particular. There are quite a few african countries that won't accept GE foods, for a number of reasons.

    And someone modded my grandparent offtopic. Wtf? Its not entirely ontopic, but its to do with the subject.

  6. Re:Utterly insane on Starving Nation Turns Down Bioengineered Corn · · Score: 1

    Lots of europe won't accept GE corn. Many reasons apply, including Patent Rights to companies for the food being one.

    Lots of countries export to europe, including Zimbabwe. They are primarily worried about the loss of one of their markets if the crops become tainted with GE.

    Its all going down the gurgler, thanks to Mugabe.

  7. Re:Slashdot misses the point on Starving Nation Turns Down Bioengineered Corn · · Score: 1

    If Zimbabwe's crops were tainted, they could lose their primary source of revenue.

    Can someone explain this to me. Their people are starving, yet their worried about their loss of exports to Europe? This is not about the crops, but they seemed to be more worried about their money than their people, at least that is the view i get.

  8. Playing Devil's Advocate on Starving Nation Turns Down Bioengineered Corn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    On the subject of patented crops, only.

    I find it quite disturbing that African Countries are prepared to starve their people, rather than contribute money to big overseas giants. This must speak volumes about the problems with patented crops.

    Food should never come patented, as it is THE basic necessity of life. What next, patented water?

    While Mugabe's regime is corrupt to the core, and the government bought this on themselves, there should be no excuse for forcing third world countries into a subservient like existence, where they have to pay multinationals for their basic food.

    Get rid of patents on food. The companies deserve to be paid for advancing food technology and supply, but this isn't they way to go about.

    (Disclaimer: Yes, i have read the article (it was on Fark the other day), and yes, it's only meant to be used for feeding, but that doesn't mean it will be.)

  9. Re:Nice. on unix.com Wins Domain Dispute · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I love moderators.

    People, that aint a troll. There is a finger, it is saying "Fsck you, open group".

    The parent stands true. Someone please underate it up thanks.

  10. Re:In other news... on India's ISPs Want Payola from Big Portals · · Score: 1

    Why the hell do you thihk a cable connection costs $40 - 50 american dollars a month for a 1 gigabyte download. Yes, only 1 gig a month.

    IIRC, 10 gig is about $150 american dollars a month.

  11. Re:FIST post on August 22nd EFF Benefit Party at the DNA Lounge · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    You know, maybe learning HTML should be one of the things you put on your to do list. Right under, getting a brain.

  12. Re:ICANN is trying to stomp out the public interes on Karl Auerbach Wins Right To Inspect ICANN Records · · Score: 1

    Hey AC, have the balls to actually post using even your pseudo account, and I'll go ahead and feed them to you for dinner.

    Till you actually can prove you have balls and post non AC though...I won't be holding my breath.


    Translation : I have no fucking argument, but i still wanna look like i know everything!

    Some people post AC or haven't got an account for a reason, doesn't make their point of view any more or less valid. Whats the difference between an AC or someone posting under GSloop? SHIT ALL.

  13. Re:Australia's inventing all the cool stuff. on Scramjet Success in Australia · · Score: 1

    Yeah, just look at all of the neat things which Australia have are invent:

    Yes you australias are very cool lol!

    Looks like your country invented shitty grammar and spelling. Stupidity, too.

    Australians invented kicking ass at all sports, as well.

  14. Re:Of course backwards-compatible on AMD's 64-Bit Chip · · Score: 1

    Notice i only said slightly.

    I personally prefer AMD's way of going the upgrade, though the main focus is on the server market, is probably better to get the upgrade's done as quickly as possible, as more stability can probably be achieved.

    But as usual, im probably talking out of my ass :).

  15. Re:Of course backwards-compatible on AMD's 64-Bit Chip · · Score: 1

    So in other words, both companies are doing most likely the same thing, though Intel is slightly more underhanded about theirs. Ie, people are encouraged to run 64 bit stuff, because the 32 bit stuff on Itanium will run as slow as a wet week.

  16. Re:AMD Reigns Supreme on AMD's 64-Bit Chip · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Moderators, look, someone is going against the word of slashdot, which is AMD is god. This person dares invoke the name of the villanious she-devil, called Intel. MOD HIM DOWN!!! NOW!!!!

    Slashdot, where a personal opinion or experience, no matter how valid, will be used against you.

  17. Re:Wow on AMD's 64-Bit Chip · · Score: 1

    " I do not live in a world of absolutes."

    I was under the impression time was absolute, due to the psychological, thermodynamic and cosmological arrows all going the same way.

  18. Re:Of course backwards-compatible on AMD's 64-Bit Chip · · Score: 1

    Backwards compatible, to a point. Whats probably best is to have a hybrid 32/64 chip for a little while, get most or a majority of people on to 64 bit programs and systems, then make the switch to a standalone 64 bit system.

    Of course, there are always users who wouldn't upgrade at all, because they insecure in anything new. Thats where you have a problem.

  19. Re:How typical. on Open Source Politics - Maintaining Your Vision? · · Score: 1

    Nice post. Its a pity that some people have to comment on everything that they think is irrelevant to them. I've done it in the past, though i regret it now.

    Mod parent up.

  20. Re:Take that a step further on ACLU Study Wary of Broadband Providers · · Score: 1

    " p2p blocking is what makes broadband worthwhile to the average person."

    You don't get it do you?

    Who's the average person. My parents are average, they use broadband for nothing more than email (large files from work) and web surfing. Im fairly average (lets not discriminate here :) ), and i use broadband only for slashdot, k5 and some of the odd warcraft/starcraft games, and also some files and isos for mandrake. I have never used a p2p sharing system, at all.

    There are millions of stories like mine. Just because your local media outlet has the FUD from record companies talking up unauthorised copying, doesn't mean its true.

    Get your head out of the sand, realize that cable is an essential part of peoples lives, for other reasons completely non-related to p2p, and decide to start thinking.

  21. Re:Not about the future.... on MIT Technology Review on Where Orwell Went Wrong · · Score: 1

    Yeah, 1984 WAS required reading here in Queensland, Australia for high school students.

    Just chipping in.

  22. Re:I am probably pretty stupid.. but... on Apple to Unveil .Mac Today · · Score: 0, Troll

    N/M, I AM a total dickhead.

    I shall now, in accordance with CliT Law, kill myself :).

  23. I am probably pretty stupid.. but... on Apple to Unveil .Mac Today · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    "Yes, this means that if you don't pay Apple, your mac.com URL and email address will stop working.

    I though this would of been logical. Example: If i don't pay my cable bill, i won't have any more cable. Or am i missing something?

  24. Re:bad news for science? on Elements 116 and 118 are Bogus? · · Score: 1

    I always thought your trolls were obvious, but you still manage to get people. Well done.

  25. Re:Is it possible.... on Elements 116 and 118 are Bogus? · · Score: 1

    If i had mod points, you'd be getting a +1 funny. Nice one.

    But since your karma capped, this works just as well :).