Slashdot Mirror


Some Spammer Has a Crush on You

ewhac writes "Salon is running an article about how that cryptic email saying someone has a crush on you may not be what it seems. Portrayed as services to foster romance, some voice concern that some such sites -- two with falsified WHOIS records -- are preying on people's insecurities to build spam lists and directed relationship graphs (who knows who). One site in particular, SomeoneLikesYou, has the temerity to demand you subscribe to an affiliate marketing program or cough up $14.90 before it will hand over the email address of your alleged crush.

A friend of mine and I were bit by SomeoneLikesYou in the last week. The scam is elegant in its simplicity. The site teases you with an email claiming to know someone who likes you, then makes you guess who it might be by submitting their email address(es). Each of those addresses receives a teaser email just like yours. Rinse, repeat. I ignored the message -- obviously a fake; I couldn't possibly be anyone's crush :-) -- but my friend took the bait and fed it some demographic data and email addresses. Once she realized what was going on, she wrote to everyone apologizing for any spam they may have received. She also sent a nastygram to the site's operators.

It should be pointed out that there is no proof that SomeoneLikesYou is doing anything nefarious with the data they're collecting. However, their credibility is not strengthened by their faked WHOIS records and their meaningless doubletalk on privacy issues (the declaration, "We send precisely zero e-mail advertisements," says nothing about the behavior of their partners/affiliates.)"

277 comments

  1. another fp for mrgoat! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    yay! Kirsten Dunst rules!

    1. Re:another fp for mrgoat! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ohmygosh this is so wrong i can't believe that we're complaining about spammers and then entice everyone to start spamming the spammers, talk about two-faced!

  2. awwwww damn by gatesh8r · · Score: 5, Funny

    I sent in my money and all she sent me was spam. And here I thought she was going to send me a nude pic and hours of hardcore action.

    --
    Karma whorin' since 1999
    1. Re:awwwww damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Fuck spammers. Fuck them in their stupid asses.

    2. Re:awwwww damn by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      At the very least they should've told you how to make money at home, find some Viagra, get a bigger penis, larger breasts, and get some money out of Nigeria.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  3. i wonder if you ever find out... by buzban · · Score: 1

    I've seenthese, and have wondered if these sites ever really tell you where they got your address. I.e., I suspect that they start with a list like every other spam-oriented site or company, but if I enter my friends email, and she guesses correctly that I'm the one with the crush, does the site say so? Or does it let you keep dumping email addresses in there till you tire of it (and they have more addresses)...something tells me it's the latter. ;)

    1. Re:i wonder if you ever find out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Don't think so. I had one of these, and couldn't find out who it was until I suspected they were just harvesting email addys.

      Just for fun, I sent a "crush" to a different email account of mine, and it wouldn't let me "guess" the correct address.

      Spammers!

    2. Re:i wonder if you ever find out... by gmack · · Score: 2

      That should be easy to test... just create 2 hotmail accounts and 2 fake accounts on the crush site.

    3. Re:i wonder if you ever find out... by langed · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I was fortunate enough so far in my 23 years to have filtered away from my usual existance most of the people who would pilfer my email for such frivolous purposes.
      So when my address was spammed by SomeoneLikesYou, I got on the phone. Sure enough, the one person who actually did it was my not-so-security-minded girlfriend.


      So when I hit the site, I entered only one email address--hers. The site didn't like that, and since it doesn't like bounces either, I just started registering aliases on my linux box. So we had a@mybox.net, b@mybox.net, c@mybox.net, and d@mybox.net.

      And, sure enough, when it finally accepted that, it said I had a match! (I also had some 4 more emails popping up in my inbox....)

      Since the site demanded that I pay up-front or sign up for affiliate info, I went on my merry way, happy to know I hadn't offended anyone else.

      About a month later, though, I got this email "Are you sure this loser Sara is right for you?" which told me to come back and visit the site again, threatening to remove my information and promising not to spam me again. I received a second mesage, again titled "Are you sure this loser Sara is right for you?", before I created a new procmail rule.

      I figured I was lucky, I got everything I wanted to know without it costing me anything but the time. I doubt many others were so lucky.

    4. Re:i wonder if you ever find out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried that, and surprise, surprise: it never told me I made a match. All that I got in return were more fields to put in more email addresses. Go figure... :-P

    5. Re:i wonder if you ever find out... by purpledinoz · · Score: 1

      Okay, I really think the US military should use some of their powers to bomb the sh!t out of these m0therfuking spamming @$$holes. If someone went on a spammer killing spree, he'd be my hero. Why don't we DoS these mofo spamming companies?!

    6. Re:i wonder if you ever find out... by ektor · · Score: 2, Funny

      I figured I was lucky, I got everything I wanted to know without it costing me anything but the time. I doubt many others were so lucky.

      Are you sure? Do you know if this loser Sara is right for you?

    7. Re:i wonder if you ever find out... by osu-neko · · Score: 2, Informative
      I got one of these the other day, so I did the logical thing. Being a sysadmin knowing how to use both useradd and for loops, I quickly created 30 email addresses on one of the servers I admin (after I found out it wouldn't accept bouncing addresses), then mined it for all the information I could. Eventually, it just ran out of hints to give me. I was about to delete all the accounts I created, but out of curiousity over your very question, I responded with one of them and listed myself as someone I like.

      Now, the site just gave me another one of those "Try again" or "Think Harder" messages, however, a few hours later, both my real account and the fake one received a message saying there was a match on the list I'd submitted. One assumes the delay is to keep you entering email addresses even after you've entered the correct one.

      It should be noted, however, that the match message didn't say who it was. It promised to reveal that if I signed up for some service. Since I already knew, I didn't bother, my best guess would be that, yah, once they've managed to get you to provide them with a big list of working addresses, and signed up for a service, generating income for them, they probably would have told me who it was.

      Incidently, they don't tell you it someone removes you from their match list. Presumeably they don't want you to know they someone doesn't like you anymore. Perhaps we need a SomeHatesYou.com for this vital service... :)

      As for the original message, this is problematic. The address is unfortunately both one that a lot of people, particularly someone matching the profile I got back mining for hints, might send me mail at. At the same time, it's also listed on a college website I admin, so it may have just been harvested. Who knows. If someone in that particular circle of friends likes me, they're going to have to be a bit more forward. The hints are vague enough to be almost useless if you have a large enough circle of friends. Basicly, if it's real, it's one of my "college friends", which I already knew based on the email address they used...

      Eh bien, c'est la vie...

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    8. Re:i wonder if you ever find out... by langed · · Score: 1
      Well, no, I suppose not. But the point was, it demonstrated that I had determined the exact match if it confirmed that one of them was the match, and the others were fictitious addresses. Therefore, as far as the site was concerned, she was the match.

      On the other hand, certain other sites estimate our compatibility at well under 40%. Nevertheless, the sex is good, as 2.5 years together might suggest... ;p

      YMMV. HTH. HAND.

  4. Oh No! by thogard · · Score: 3, Funny

    I just checked my logs and it appears that my antispam software just deleted a message about someone who likes me without me getting a chance to read it. Maybe its time to go back to the old method of just hitting delete now that the carpal tunnel syndrome is almost gone on the finger I use on the delete key.

    1. Re:Oh No! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Attention fellow ./ readers:
      If you get one of these emails it is bogus.
      Come on... you read slashdot, how could it be real?

    2. Re:Oh No! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      "Weird", not "Wierd".

  5. Those things are spam + social engineering by Montag2k · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have an e-mail address that I have used to register for exactly one thing: AOL Instant messenger. I've never sent any other e-mail through this account, I've never published the address on the internet, or anywhere else for that matter. Yet apparently someone who has a crush on me has managed to get that e-mail address and report it to Crushlink! I don't even want to log on to the site to get onto their opt-out list because I don't trust them enough not to sell my address once they have verified that there is an actual person behind it.

    Argh, I hate spam.

    1. Re:Those things are spam + social engineering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Well its obvious then: AOL loves you!

      AOL and Montag
      Sitting in a tree
      K-I-S-S-I-N-G!

    2. Re:Those things are spam + social engineering by Kitaro242 · · Score: 0

      ha ha, nice one. So long as customers continue to refuse to read their privacy policies and accept their agreements, this will happen; not until there is a concerted effort on the part of consumers to defeat this by way of a boycott on certain products or policies of companies which disregard a customer's privacy entirely will it begin to trickle down.

      Kitaro242
      http://www.VerizonEatsPoop.com

    3. Re:Those things are spam + social engineering by garcia · · Score: 2

      I use my own email address for AIM. I have never recv'd a piece of spam from them. I have posted about this before I believe, but I must be one of the ONLY people in the world that recv's less than 5 pieces of spam a year.

      Lucky me I guess.

    4. Re:Those things are spam + social engineering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      That's because your email address is bill@whitehouse.gov.

      You already know that lewinski@fatbrain.com already likes you. You have no need for a service like this.

    5. Re:Those things are spam + social engineering by ckedge · · Score: 2

      Nope, I also get zero spams a year.

      How?

      If you don't give the spammers your e-mail address, they can't spam you!!

      The only provisio's are that your e-mail address isn't guessable, that you don't use your primary e-mail address with companies/sites that you don't trust (almost all web forms that you fill in for any purpose), and that your e-mail provider isn't scum (like Hotmail).

    6. Re:Those things are spam + social engineering by wishus · · Score: 2

      I use my own email address for AIM. I have never recv'd a piece of spam from them. I have posted about this before I believe, but I must be one of the ONLY people in the world that recv's less than 5 pieces of spam a year.

      I don't know who hosts your email, but it's quite possible they already have a spam filter in place. Evidently a quite good one. ;)

    7. Re:Those things are spam + social engineering by 198348726583297634 · · Score: 1, Informative

      The same thing happened to me! The only place my email address was ever made public was scrawled in pen across the breasts of the hussy I conquered for the night. Luscious melon breasts, if you will.

    8. Re:Those things are spam + social engineering by kaoshin · · Score: 1

      I've recieved spams where my username matched someone elses and the spam generator will just try all kinds of domains with the username that they have on file... etc. etc. They have all kinds of tricks.
      Out of frustration, I set up a filter only allowing users who are on my contact list to send me mail. Mails without from addresses are dropped, mails not addressed to me (except if they match mailing lists) are dropped. The mails that aren't dropped are sent an autoreply, which has flood protection to prevent someone else from being flooded by my autoresponder when I am sent a slew of mails with forged from headers. I also made a cron daily script to use pwgen to create a password which is put in the autoresponder email which requires they put it in the subject in order to respond so I can still get mail from people who are not in my contact list, if they take time to put in a password. Even then they can't send me more than 3 emails per day like that or anything over a meg in size if they don't know me.
      The funny thing is after all the time I spent working on my spam filter some mortgage company spam slipped through anyway because my script that extracts the actual from address from the email did not expect someone to send me an email with only lessthan and greaterthan symbols in the from line. Now I have to revise it once again. Hopefully this is the last time I get a spam, but I'm not going to say it this time because I don't want to jinx myself. Other than that one email though so far I have got zero spams so far this year (except from my mom, who is about to get blocked if she doesn't stop forwarding me her crap!)

    9. Re:Those things are spam + social engineering by __aakpxi9117 · · Score: 1

      Despite what has been said on this thread... There is, in fact, a wonderful way to stop all spam.

      And before anyone even thinks of posting, I do realize that no-one seems to care. Everyone is happy with half-assed methods that will work until they get popular (similar to Gnutella that way). For some reason, a method that works, doesn't require special software, or some non-profit organization to run it, just hasn't caught on.

      Anyhow, here is my howto:

      http://slashdot.org/~ryancooley/journal/9467

  6. on mobile phone sms messaging as well by fredrik70 · · Score: 1

    Funnyv (well not really), have had pretty much the same message on my mobile phone here in the UK, my mates in sweden got them as well on the swedish network. Wonder if they're the same or if the spammers picked up the idea from those sms messages...

    --
    if (!signature) { throw std::runtime_error("No sig!"); }
  7. Just reward... by Babbler · · Score: 1

    I'm just stunned that people actually fall for this stuff.

    1. Re:Just reward... by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How many virus hoaxes do you get in your e-mail box? Nothing suprises me anymore.
      Face it, people are stupid, and the internet is the place where they all meet.

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    2. Re:Just reward... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I fell for it. Although, the message to me was written in swedish, and I didn't actually think that the company was sofisticated enough to realize that I'm swedish, neither did I think that they cared about the swedish market.

      I don't really care about all the spam I get, I more or less enjoy giving the people at MSN more traffic to my hotmail-box. I figure that if I'm active enough on the internet with my hotmail-address, then all the emails to me alone would count as a DoS-attack.

      By the way, my email address is... well, maby spam isn't that fun after all.... /Kolenkow

  8. Of course ! by doru · · Score: 1

    They notify you by flying pig courier !

  9. This is obviously a ploy. by yeoua · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is obviously a plot... who the hell in their right mind would have a crush on me?!?!

    1. Re:This is obviously a ploy. by krog · · Score: 5, Funny

      these guys sent "someone has a crush on you!" messages to thousands of MIT students. talk about blowing your cover. :)

    2. Re:This is obviously a ploy. by ranulf · · Score: 1
      these guys sent "someone has a crush on you!" messages to thousands of MIT students. talk about blowing your cover. :)

      Obviously, they came from ai.mit.edu domains and an AI lover was good enough for them.

  10. Who has a message for you by mr_z_beeblebrox · · Score: 1

    People who signed up for free memberships with classmates.com are now getting the message "Who has a message for you" They are then given the option of finding out who "has a message for them" by purchasing a premium membership. The things is why does everyone have a message all the sudden?

    1. Re:Who has a message for you by jmccay · · Score: 2

      I haven't gotten that email from them yet, but there is a job search engine like that. You post your resume and sign up for email with jobs matching your criteria. I got three from them. Then send you jobs on the other side of the country for the free part, but they list a lot of jobs in your area under the premium section. In order to get the job listings that are relevent to you, you have to pay them money. It smells very fishy, so I maintained my strict policy of not spending money over the internet. I refuse to pay for saomething like that.

      --
      At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
  11. We did this in primary school by stere0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    SOME GIRL: I know somebody who's got a crush on you
    ME: Oh yeah? Who?
    SOME GIRL: Will you pay me if I let you have a guess?
    ME: I don't care, I'm rich, there you go. Is it SHE?
    SOME GIRL: No. Nice try, though.

    [later...]

    SOME GIRL: Hey OTHER GIRL, I know somebody who likes you
    SHE: Oh yeah? Who?
    SOME GIRL: Will you pay me if I let you have a guess?
    SHE: There you go. Is it stere0?
    (note: I didn't have facial hair in primary school)
    SOME GIRL: No.

    I overheard them, and this is how SOME GIRL got rich by doing this to the whole school and how I got my first kiss a couple of weeks later. :-D

    --
    Trollem mirabilem hanc subnotationis exigiutas non caperet
    1. Re:We did this in primary school by mr_z_beeblebrox · · Score: 1

      I overheard them, and this is how SOME GIRL got rich by doing this to the whole school and how I got my first kiss a couple of weeks later

      She proobably owns this company now. You should reply you might find true love

    2. Re:We did this in primary school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you're saying you found out that your gay first grade teacher who was previously a manequin had a crush on you and kissed you?

      Thanks for coming out, but we don't need this sort of gay shit on Slashdot. Taco's manwife is scary enough. Away with ye.

    3. Re:We did this in primary school by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 3, Funny

      What school was this, Ponzi Elementary?

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    4. Re:We did this in primary school by Kyeo · · Score: 1

      I got my first kiss a couple of weeks later

      College is a wonderful time in a boys life...

    5. Re:We did this in primary school by 198348726583297634 · · Score: 1

      Ha ha, yes. Very true. Excellent idea.

    6. Re:We did this in primary school by cqnn · · Score: 2

      Okay, leave us in suspense then...

      Which one did you get your first kiss from,
      SOME GIRL, or OTHER GIRL?

      And no, I'm not gonna pay you for a hint...

  12. It's FAKE?! by joshua404 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I spend $15,000 on this engagement ring for nothing?!

    1. Re:It's FAKE?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude
      I spent $15,000 on a thicker, longer cock and got nothing

    2. Re:It's FAKE?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've given a guy in Nigeria about $15,000 to help him smuggle a load of money to me and my cut is going to be $40 million US DOLLARS!

    3. Re:It's FAKE?! by Corvaith · · Score: 2

      .oO($15,000 engagement ring?)

      So... what's a guy like you doing in a joint like this? ;)

  13. a question by Husaria · · Score: 1

    I had noticed my edu email recieves no spam, while my hotmail account recieves lots. I used an edu email, (i didnt care about this edu email account) for this purpose, and I used a hotmail account. Now, the crush company sent me a bullshit email and I responded to it from each account.
    My hotmail inbox recieves 100 spam a day
    My edu inbox has had no spam at all.

    My question is, are spammers restricted to sending spam to certain edus? There is no known spam filter in place at that edu, so its a curosity.

    Oh yes, if I provided false information to a ISP for their services, I would most certainly get shut down, so why wouldn't they. And the money you make from the spammers from the ISPs isn't worth the cost of keeping them, (angry users and bandwidth)

    1. Re:a question by conduit4 · · Score: 1

      I get spam in my edu account but not that much. I only used it for a couple resume posting sites and maybe a couple other things. Oh yeah and its up on a personal site. I'm sure I would get more if I used it more often. We have spam assasin installed but I havaent tweeked mine so I still get all the spam but it has ******************SPAM*************** in the title so I cant miss it.

    2. Re:a question by corian · · Score: 1
      My question is, are spammers restricted to sending spam to certain edus?

      Nah, they just don't expect students to have any money to take up their offers. Either that, or they use some sort of simple "ends in .com" filter on the harvested addresses to rule out fake ones.

    3. Re:a question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not that I know of, I work at a medical school and many users get spammed relentlessly there. I hardly get any spam in my email box after four years or so here (maybe one or two messages a month), but some people get 30 per day. A few safe email / Internet practices will keep your account safe (like never put your main email address in a web form you don't 100% trust, don't use that email address to post to usenet or other Internet forums, don't use it on slashdot, never reply to spam if you do get any, etc). Spammers can't send you spam if they don't know what your address is.

    4. Re:a question by CoolVibe · · Score: 2

      My mail address is pretty public, since I have my own site, and I get deluged by korean spam. I have no clue why. Maybe they try to get back at me for that NetBSD on the X-BOX hoax I pulled last April 1st. Who knows? At least I have spamassasin to rid me of these goofs. Oh, and spamassasin blocks the someonelikesyou mails here. Just checking... yep, I got a few too. Oh well...

    5. Re:a question by 3rd_Floo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, at my edu we still get alot of spam every day. The school has some spam-filter installed, but its not very good. Although 90% of the spam on that account is from the edu itself. Why they allow all prof's and facuilty to send mail to everyone@wishiwasabetter.edu i'll never know... there own fault though, they put us on an IMAP server with no hard mailbox limit.... heheh...

    6. Re:a question by gmack · · Score: 4, Interesting

      EDU domains tend to scare spammers.. not only is there not much money to be got. They are likely to end up with some anti spam vigalante with a lot of free time that can be spent causing them pain.

    7. Re:a question by WeedMonkey · · Score: 1

      Heh, that's very stylish... you have to tell us how many people downloaded 180 megs' worth of /dev/zero though :-)

    8. Re:a question by CoolVibe · · Score: 2
      well, some did... :)

      I'll keep the amount and hostnames secret to protect the guilty ;) (yes, even the guys at M$ had a go at it, see here)

    9. Re:a question by CoolVibe · · Score: 2

      Whoops.. that link should be this. Should've used preview I guess...

    10. Re:a question by Telemakhos · · Score: 1

      I graduated from my .edu three years ago and my account was terminated then. I enrolled again this summer as a visiting grad student to take a course and received the same e-mail address. I've used the e-mail address only to communicate with my professor.

      And I'm getting spam.

      Spammers are STILL using the mailing lists from 1999, I guess.

      By the way, the crush spams were around back then too. And even in those days of ignorance, we still had sense enough not to reply.

    11. Re:a question by bsr · · Score: 1

      Where do you get that demonstrably untrue idea? I get as much or more spam on my .edu address as on my .com/.net/.org addresses. Methinks spammers don't give a shit.

      --bsr

  14. Here's where you get in to trouble. . . by g()()ber · · Score: 1

    Your significant other puts your email address in. You get an email saying "somone likes you". You send it to the trash. Your significant other gets mad at you for not liking them back.

    --
    I am so one thousand three hundred and thirty seven!
    1. Re:Here's where you get in to trouble. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Redundant by now)

      Significant other? Slashdot users? What dimensional rift did you fall through?

  15. Fair use, sort of (rant) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if it's fair to link to the print version of the article. For everything we know Salon is not in good financial shape anyway, using the nice no-ads print version service they provide to circumvent the ads seems rather questionable to me. Using the /. effect for something good (funding Salon) wouldn't be so bad, now wouldn't it?

    While I'm at, how about those people who are sitting at the end of a cable modem and think they need ad-blockers?

    Just my .02 CHF.

  16. in Germany they do this on mobile phones by mario · · Score: 5, Interesting

    funny, some weeks ago I received a SMS on my mobile with the same content, telling me: Someone who is too shy has a crush on you.
    To find out dial: 0190-whatever

    0190 is in Germany the dialing prefix for Premium rate-services (from 1 to 10 euros/minute)

    I didn't call but looked in the newsgroups if someone has: works exactly the same way you described:
    - please give us some mobile numbers from persons you guess that might be it..

    1. Re:in Germany they do this on mobile phones by Openadvocate · · Score: 1

      I got one of those to, seems like they have been "popular" in most of the EU right now.
      Only I should call a number somewhere in Saint Helena(the place to be if you want to phonescam someone).

      Sadly enough, I knew from the message that it had to be a fake. :)

      --
      my sig
    2. Re:in Germany they do this on mobile phones by WalterSobchak · · Score: 1

      Check tarif-express for an interesting story about German 0190 crush scams.

      For the number 0190 / 824 308, I found out via RefTP (sorta like the German FCC) the reseller is QSC, and upon request they immediately provided me with the information, that a "Triple A Communication GmbH" in Düsseldorf operates the number.

      Should you be interested in more details, feel free to contact me.

      Alex

      --
      Absinthe makes the heart grow fonder
    3. Re:in Germany they do this on mobile phones by PigleT · · Score: 2

      Yes, I had that on my mobile here as well, only it was an 0960 number (premium rate)...

      I tracked Googled for the postcode, tracked the number down to somewhere in a shady area of London where - how shall this? - desperate single folks would be guaranteed a choice from a variety of alternative "good times"... Quite a few interesting organizations all within the same block of town.

      Funny that, they didn't get my business... :)

      --
      ~Tim
      --
      .|` Clouds cross the black moonlight,
      Rushing on down to the circle of the turn
    4. Re:in Germany they do this on mobile phones by szakacs · · Score: 1
      In France, there was a wave of this kind of "pink SMS" in May 2002. The Commission of Computers and Freedom (CNIL, which is in charge of the enforcement of human rights in computer-related issues) started a legal action in July against the companies which sent the SMSs. This initiative is pretty rare: the CNIL used it only 18 times since 1978.

      I think there is no judgement yet. For more information (in French): zdnet.fr

    5. Re:in Germany they do this on mobile phones by 198348726583297634 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Accupro in the northern territorities is doing this now, too. And they charge you for incoming messages! At least I have classy genitals. 8===D

  17. The SMS lover scam by SomethingOrOther · · Score: 2

    Careful.... Replying to one of those messages is an 09*** number. Typically charging about £1 ( ~US$1.30) per minute!

    --
    Anyone quoted by a reporter knows how little they understand
    Don't believe what you read is the truth.
    1. Re:The SMS lover scam by ranulf · · Score: 4, Informative
      Yeah, I've had about five similar message such as from "Flirt Love Box". "Tried to call you but you were out", "Tried to send an SMS", etc.. messages, all with 0909 premium rate numbers.

      At the bottom, it adds "The call is charged as a long distance call - For UK the charge is 2.5 Pence/sec" which is £1.50 per minute. Even then, I don't think that's enough to cover them legally, as I beleive they have to state the cost as a per-minute rate.

      Fortunately, I'm not stupid enough to believe that these messages are for me. No-one I know sends messages in bright yellow with red and blue headings.

      Just remember how UK phone charges work:
      01/02 - standard long distance geographic number. Basically cheap.
      05 - I don't think this is used, except 0500 which is free
      07 - mobile, going to be quite expensive
      08 - information. Generally increasing in cost as number increases, except for 0845 charged as local
      09 - premium rate. Cost determined by operator, without limit.
      00 - international. Again expensive.

      If you don't know what the number is, don't dial!

    2. Re:The SMS lover scam by rawles · · Score: 1

      Hello Ranulf, fancy seeing you here! 05 is now called 'Corporate Numbering' by Oftel. 04 and 06 aren't being used. 01, 02, 03 are geographic. 07 is mobiles, paging and personal numbers. This URL has long long lists of codes for you to print out and tape to your wall so you know what's being charged. Here's hoping all my future Slashdot posts will be as fascinating, Rawles

    3. Re:The SMS lover scam by timmyf2371 · · Score: 1
      Regarding 09-- numbers:

      According to the Independent Committee for the Supervision of Standard or Telephone Information Services (ICSSTIS), the highest premium rate charge is £1.50 - there is a limit.

      My local council issued an alert about dialing £50 per minute numbers from landline telephone numbers, but the local newspaper issued a correction with the information from ICSSTIS.

      Tim

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
  18. Spammers like it doggy style by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "My dog has gotten 'someone has a crush on you' e-mail messages -- she's a cute dog, but no one has a crush on her," says Karen Demars, co-founder of eCrush. "My belief is that they are sending 'someone has a crush on you' messages to people who have not been legitimately crushed."

    Yes, but on the Internet
    *) No one knows you're a dog (unless dogs can reply?)
    *) On the Internet, there are people who have crushes on dogs.

  19. One time e-mail addresses by Fuzzums · · Score: 3, Informative

    If some lame service requires you to supply them with an e-mail address, use a one-time address.
    Read is once for your password. If you start receiving spam you know the originator and can iglore that address.

    Spammotel provides in such a service. Also some providers allow you to use alias@your_name.your_isp.com, making it simple to track the origin of spam and making it easyer to filter (loveletter.com@my_name.my_isp.com)

    Hotmail serves the purpose of one-time accounts very well. How hard is it to forget about a hotmail account anyway?

    --
    Privacy is terrorism.
    1. Re:One time e-mail addresses by DeadSea · · Score: 5, Informative

      You can't do that for this service. Your *friends* give them your email address. I'd like to find out which of my "friends" gave my personal email address to crushlink.com (a similar service) and beat them. However it looks like the only way I can find out is by entering the email addresses of all my friends so they all get spammed.

    2. Re:One time e-mail addresses by forgoil · · Score: 2

      Give them a working .gov address, might not do anything good in the scheme of things, but maybe, just maybe, they will get tons of spam and start to reconsider their stand on letting spam be legal.

      And, american spammers, I don't give a shit about your laws on spam when you send me an email to my _swedish_ address. Come on people, there is something wrong here...

    3. Re:One time e-mail addresses by orkysoft · · Score: 2

      All those lines in spam claiming to be compliant with some US law are bogus, even in the US. Those laws were proposed, but never passed. (AFAIK)

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    4. Re:One time e-mail addresses by Jugalator · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've tried Spamgourmet. Excellent free service where you can do this:

      1. Register a username like "foo".
      2. Register at the MegaSpam forum.
      3. Tell them your e-mail address is megaspam.2.foo@spamgourmet.com.
      4. You will be forwarded the next 2 mails from the MegaSpam forum, probably containing password details as such things.
      5. Spamgourmet will then eat all mails from the MegaSpam forum.

      They also allow you to list trusted senders, which don't advance the message count for your temporary address, reply address masking, and password prefixes so others can't make up new addresses with your username.

      Pretty nice, especially as it's free and no ads or other catches. They have around 14,000 accounts as of today and eats about 12,000 spams/day. :-)

      And there's also despammed.org where any mails to that address will be filtered from spam before it's sent to your primary address or the web service. Everything on that site is free (and ad free) as well.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    5. Re:One time e-mail addresses by thogard · · Score: 2

      14,000 accounts and only 12,000 spams a day? I've got 46 users in my passwd file and about 10 real users and my filters have killed 4660 spams since the start of the month.

      Of course I've been using the same userid online since 95 and its in every spamer database in the world but I've also have a few thousand fake address that are out there just to slow down the spamers.

    6. Re:One time e-mail addresses by Mr+Guy · · Score: 1

      Apparently you need smaller words.

      Your *friends* don't have to give them the address. They are *lying* about this. You *give* them the address of your *friends* then they bug them if you fall for it, and *maybe* one of your friends fell for it. Most *likely* your *friend* was a spambot that *sold* them your *email* because they discovered you interchange *apostrophes* and *quotation marks* when *emphasizing* *unnecessarily*.

    7. Re:One time e-mail addresses by krinsh · · Score: 1

      Until the last two years; I used to rely on my hotmail address for everything. I especially liked being able to get to it from **anywhere**, and all my tech and industry newsletters, "junk mail" that I *wanted*, would go there. Now I cannot get anything at all because I had to lock down the account with the junk mail filter to avoid spam. I turn it back once or twice a week for an hour to see if I can get the e-newsletters I want... and turn it off as soon as I peak past 250 spams.

      --
      I think with the interesting people, their lives can't possibly be wrapped up into a nice little package.
    8. Re:One time e-mail addresses by aka-ed · · Score: 2
      Actually, the best address to provide scammers is uce@ftc.gov, especially if they are too dumb to know what that address is.

      The FTC is acting against spam, at least scamming spammers, though not as much as you or I might like. I used to post in newsgroups with .gov addresses, but really -- what benefit is there in further bogging down the agencies that we'd like to help us?

      --
      I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
    9. Re:One time e-mail addresses by loconet · · Score: 2

      Ive been using sneakemail.com.

      It is pretty good. You can create a fake e-mail address like osifj823494@sneakemail.com and allows unlimited number of e-mails forwarded to your real email address.

      You can easiliy detect if you are receiving spam from the fake e-mail address you created and easily realize which website sold your e-mail address to spammers. You can later delete that fake e-mail address and stop the spam.

      --
      [alk]
    10. Re:One time e-mail addresses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that makes for a fun way of munging email addresses ...

      person.at.domain.suffix%20uce@ftc.gov

      Harvest *that* ....

    11. Re:One time e-mail addresses by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      Your *friends* give them your email address. I'd like to find out which of my "friends" gave my personal email address to crushlink.com

      All my "friends" just happen to be spammers themselves.

      "Here's my list of friends."

    12. Re:One time e-mail addresses by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      Handy household hint:

      If you don't mind doing filtering on your own email address, most email programs accept a + in the mailto: field. That way, if your real email address is jblow@example.com, you can have as much email sent to that account as you like using a + and a suffix.

      jblow+spamtrap@example.com
      jblow+whatever@examp le.com
      jblow+abcd@example.com

      All of the above addresses will actually put mail into the jblow@example.com account.

      Then you can filter any way that you wish using the "to:" field in your received email.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
  20. all your email we own.... by TheHawke · · Score: 1

    *hand over 14.95 or they will sell your email...* Hmmm smells like extortion to me folks... Feel free to ship all these emails to ftc.gov and let them deal with these jokers... In the meantime, try spamcop.net and see if they can munge the headers to find out the true source of these jokers..

    --
    First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
  21. The best way to get confidential information by Lorens · · Score: 1

    ... is not to search public fora for it, but to trick people into giving it.

    This scam is one thing. Mitnick telephoning people to tell them there's a problem with their server is another example. E-mail hoaxes (tell all your friends and everyone you care about!!!) is yet another example. It's called social engineering, and isn't new, but new applications are found every day. Education is the only answer.

  22. The laws prove true once again... by decarelbitter · · Score: 2

    First law on spamming: Spammers Lie. Which is, in this case, once again true because there is no one at all who has a crush on you. Just some dark-side marketeer who has a crush on your mailaddress so they can start shipping spam. Bah.

    (In case you're wondering, the other laws on spammers:
    2 - Recursive, If spammer seems to be telling the truth, see Rule 1.
    3 - Spammers are stupid.
    And ofcourse, the uberrule (rule 0): Spammers are thieves)

  23. You gotta be a sucker by iamwhatiseem · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm sorry, but anyone who falls for this is either young and stupid, or just a plain moron.
    How many, "I love you's", "look at my pics", etc. does it take before the suckers of the world wake up??

    1. Re:You gotta be a sucker by Fuzzums · · Score: 1

      And those suckers who fall for it, also supply them with more e-mail addresses. Possibly yours too!

      So what do we do about it?
      1) Don't have suckers as friends.
      2) Educate all your friends and relatives about free enterprise ^H^H^H^H^H^H spammers.

      --
      Privacy is terrorism.
    2. Re:You gotta be a sucker by jolshefsky · · Score: 1
      Actually, at what point do we consider lying in print via e-mail a crime?

      I went to Crushlink, but thought it was a scam ... I went back several times and got a bunch of clues--none of which were contradictory, but none of which actually pointed to anyone I knew. I never typed in a "guess" e-mail address--rather, I'd have confronted the person face-to-face. I don't know that I'm all that "stupid and young" so I guess you think I'm a moron for tentatively trying it out, eh?

      Anyway, let's say I typed in an e-mail address that wasn't the right guess. If Crushlink sends an e-mail to them that says "someone has a crush on you" and is referring to me, well, that's at least misrepresentation and at most libel. Are you saying that kind of behavior is A-Ok?

      People need to rely on some communication to be at least a little factual. If you never believe anything you sense, you are insane.

      It's really disappointing that I can receive advertising in paper mail and after filtering for usual advertising hyperbole, I can believe that (a) the product being sold can actually be purchased, (b) I could contact the company if they provide such information (or are well known), and (c) the advertising copy at least somewhat represents the product being sold. On the other hand, if I receive an e-mail with the same information, I can assume none of those things ... consider even that it's acceptable to put a link like <A HREF="http://sears.dreamhost.com"> Sears </A> to deceive the recipient.

      grumble grumble...

      --
      --- Jason Olshefsky

      Karma: Poser (mostly affected by adding this line long after everyone else did)

    3. Re:You gotta be a sucker by Prior+Restraint · · Score: 1

      2) Educate all your friends and relatives about free enterprise ^H^H^H^H^H^H spammers.

      I'm sorry, what does "free enter spammers" mean? :-)

    4. Re:You gotta be a sucker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's "free entespammers.", you numbnuts. Count the ^H's.

    5. Re:You gotta be a sucker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a space between the last ^H and the s of spammers. Should have used ^W

    6. Re:You gotta be a sucker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And a space after enterprise before the first ^H.

    7. Re:You gotta be a sucker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a sucker netborn every minute.

    8. Re:You gotta be a sucker by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sorry, but anyone who falls for this is either young and stupid, or just a plain moron.

      or just plain lonely.

      There are a lot of extremely lonely people around who figure "what have I got to lose; it's worth a try" and there you go.

      You don't have to be stupid to be lonely.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
  24. Nothing immoral about this at all by Brento · · Score: 5, Funny

    There really is someone who likes you. In fact, here's the original personal ad involved:

    "Mass email marketer ISO young, wealthy singles with low self-esteem and money to burn. Low IQ is a plus, gullibility even better. Turn-ons: making telephone calls at dinnertime, taking long walks on the beach with your money."

    --
    What's your damage, Heather?
    1. Re:Nothing immoral about this at all by jmcwork · · Score: 1

      I just got a letter from Ed McMahon saying that if I buy some magazines from him he will tell me who has a crush on me!

  25. This is great by secondsun · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As much as we hate spam, this one is really good. Get people to give you 20 or so emails from their address list voluntarily. Then spam those 20 to get 20 more. the those 400 to get 20 more then etc etc...

    Despite the fact people are getting unsolicited email from a company that they have had no business dealings with (and the fact that that is illegal...) this does seem to be an unique business tactic. Unique but sleazy and underhanded as well.

    --
    There is nothing wrong with being gay. It's getting caught where the trouble lies.
    1. Re:This is great by iapetus · · Score: 2

      MAKE MAILING LISTS FAST!

      This is NOT a scam. It is NOT a pyramid selling scheme. Use this proven technique and you could soon have a mailing list full of people to spam!

      All you have to is follow the steps listed and you could turn your pathetic mailing list into as much as 30,000 or 40,000 people desperate to be spammed. I know it sound incredible but it's simple mathematics if you follow the steps listed.

      Step 1.
      Send an e-mail with a valid e-mail address attached to each person on the list.

      1. XXX Teens! Animals! Wireless Networking! XXX
      madeupname5435843529843@hotmail.com

      2. Hey, just responding to your mail! fyt74
      funkyluvva_98@yahoo.com

      3. Great business opportunity!
      bruoigf3@scam.com

      4. Make $$$ FAST!
      <>

      5. Viagra onling!
      <The Internet Chemist>

      Step 2.
      Now remove the top name from the list and add your name to the bottom of the list in the #5 position and move the other names up accordingly.

      Step 3.
      Post the article to at least 250 e-mail marketing companies. There are at least a million of these scum at any given time so try to post to as many of them as you can. Remember, the more you post to the bigger your potential return.

      Step 4.
      You are now an evil spammer yourself and should be seeing a huge list of victims within 7 to 14 days of your postings.

      REMEMBER--- Honesty is the best policy! You really don't need to cheat to make this investment work for you. Please play fair and you too can and will make some real money by fleecing the gullible.

      --
      ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
      Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
  26. I knew there was a reason... by Penguinoflight · · Score: 1

    that spam and scam are only one letter different...
    The stupidity some people must have to belive it though.

    --
    "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
    1 John 4:14
    1. Re:I knew there was a reason... by jellybear · · Score: 1

      Scam scam scam scam!
      Scam scam scam scam!
      SCAM! Wonderful scam!

  27. Someone ought to by swaic · · Score: 1

    Sign up as Arafat and put Bush's email as the crush. Who knows, this just may be what this whole conflict needs. They can even broker some peace deal under the table. :)

    1. Re:Someone ought to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no room under the table - it's full of Arafat's catamites queuing up to blow him.

  28. Business Model? by Observer · · Score: 2
    Seems a pretty inefficient way to build a spam list. Sounds more like a variation of the classic chain letter, but fishing directly for suckers willing to cough up the $14.95.

    Karma: NaN (mostly due to meddling Slashcode programmers)

  29. They're sleazy alright... by netsharc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And they have no morals either. I once got an email saying I received an e-card sent from someone using this service. I went there and they claim to donate a cent to charities everytime someone sends a card through them. - should've realized it was bullshit during these dot.bust days. They asked for my name and email address to retrieve the card, so I typed them in and clicked "Get my Card", to only receive an error page in return. Only then that I realized that I just gave my information to some fucking spammers!

    Now I sometimes get junk from them, or from > their other alias in my hotmail account, which - interestingly - gets very little spam otherwise. Maybe because it 10+ chars long. Some of them were from legitimate companies too - some college in the UK even got duped into using their service to advertise itself.

    --
    What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    1. Re:They're sleazy alright... by mr_z_beeblebrox · · Score: 1

      THey already had your e mail and if it said they had a card but it was not addressed by name, live and learn.

  30. Trust. by saintlupus · · Score: 1

    that cryptic email saying someone has a crush on you may not be what it seems.

    That's unfortunate. After all, if you can't trust an anonymous email liberally dosed with spelling errors and exclamation points, who can you trust?

    --saint

  31. Crush scam is same as groupLotto scam by linuxislandsucks · · Score: 1

    its the same scam people offer something to get people in the door get their email and sell the address to spammers..

    Vote for Death Sentences to Spammers today! Put that political ill gotten lobby moeny to use with your congressman demand Death Penatly for Spammers!

    --
    Don't Tread on OpenSource
  32. She loves me, she loves me not by non · · Score: 1

    What do you mean I have to pay $14.90 for a stupid daisy?

    --
    ...vividly encapsulates that post-Watergate/pre-punk/coked-up moment when you could trust no one, least of all yourself.
  33. A spammer using fraudulent advertising practices?! by Dimensio · · Score: 2

    I'm shocked! Totally shocked! A spammer who is a dishonest crook? Who could have anticipated such a thing?!

  34. Funnycard by Spackler · · Score: 3, Informative

    Funnycard is also just an email harvester! It has the subject:

    Message from person_you_know via the FunnyCard Network.

    It comes with a forged header, that says it's sent from the person_you_know (of course it was my sister). Clicking on the link then requires you to put in 4 (fake of course) email addresses to see the card. As soon as you submit it, it sends the same email to all 4 addresses with a forged return address of YOU (you get back the send errors that the fake users you sent to, don't exist). Displays some lame joke (that the sender never saw), and says goodbye.

  35. Obviously fake by Salsaman · · Score: 2
    I've had a few of these emails recently. The first time one arrived, I was curious. Was it real or a fake ? The email asked me to dial a certain number to find out who it was who 'had a crush on me'.

    It was then it dawned on me that there was no identification code in the message ! If I dialed this number, how would the service know who I was ? How would it identify me, so that I could listen to my personal message ?

    After that realisation, I dumped the message straight in trash, as I have done with the numerous follow ups.

  36. This is not exactly new by Disevidence · · Score: 1

    This has been out for a while. I recall getting a few emails to my hotmail account about hmm 1 and a half years ago. When you check the website, it says you had to pay to find out who.

    Not new, and not a big deal. If someone really liked you, they could actually tell you, though this is slashdot.

    Spam is not worth your time to be read.

    --
    Think nothing is impossible? Try slamming a revolving door.
  37. I just felt really stupid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...while adding the sentence "know someone who has a crush on you" to my mailfilter.

    Just won't happen.

  38. Grats to ewhac! by Kredal · · Score: 2

    And thanks, too, for linking directly to the "printable" form of the article. One page is better than 3 or 4, and no advertising!

    Very cool. (:

    --
    Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
    1. Re:Grats to ewhac! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no he is a jerk with no consideration for doing that link stealing salons money

  39. Deduce the rate at which suckers are born by sam_handelman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My numbers come from here.

    $100 gets 10 million addresses. It costs $3,000 to send these 10 million messages. Let's assume a capital outlay of $3,100 per week, which seems reasonable.

    A "positive response rate" of 0.1% to 1% is expected. Say 0.1%, since this scam is especially egregious, that's 10,000 responses per week, is 10,000 suckers per 60 * 24 * 7 = 10,080 minutes.

    That means a sucker is born every minute (every 59.52 seconds, actually), which we already knew.

    --
    The good and new comes from no quarter where it is looked for, and is always something different from what is expected.
    1. Re:Deduce the rate at which suckers are born by fatbastard10101 · · Score: 1

      You make this scheme sound so mercenary, when it's really just a couple of penniless grad students trying to make ends meet. If the STANFORD PHYSICS DEPARTMENT gave GREG TSENG and JOHANN SCHLEIER-SMITH more financial aid, then they would have to resort to spamming support to buy their kids new shoes.

    2. Re:Deduce the rate at which suckers are born by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you a freaking MORON yourself? 0.1% response rate my ASS! More like 0.0001% response rate.

      But I guess YOU are one of those suckers too right?

    3. Re:Deduce the rate at which suckers are born by Restil · · Score: 2

      This is a fun formula you got going there, but the cost to send email is unreasonable. Assuming 2K per email message, you're talking 20 gigs of data transfer. Even with a capped cable modem connection at 128kbps, you're talking 14 days. So for the cost of two cable modem connections or one dsl line with better upstream, you can push that out easily in a week for less than $100 a month. Or less than $25 a week.

      Even if you are forced to buy a T1 line to do it, at $1500/mo, you're still talking only $350-$400 a week, and you'll be able to send out about 8 times as much spam. Of course, all the costs go up with the size of the email, but you get the idea.

      At these low rates, its obvious why you see so much spam. As long as the operating costs are so obscenely low, they don't need a high response rate. 1 out of 10,000 is enough. And there will always be enough suckers to satisfy the spammers. One of my ex girlfriend's family would spend around $300/mo on get rich quick schemes that were mailed to them (in the pre-spam days). They never seemed to get the hint. I'm sure there are are plenty of others who are the same way. Heck, I've even known people who make 6 figures who have bought into this crap. Not the same TYPE of crap mind you, but scams and spams all the way.

      There's always enough gullible people out there who will believe anything. And as long as they have money to spend, the spammers will be out there fishing.

      -Restil

      --
      Play with my webcams and lights here
  40. similar spam I received recently by opk · · Score: 1

    A few weeks ago, I got one of these e-mails. The wording of the e-mail made it blatantly obvious that it was spam. They didn't even seem to have a web site. They just told me to phone an 09 number (which, no doubt would have cost a few pounds) to find out the identity of the admirer. It was a UK phone number which makes a change - much of the spam I get seems be in Korean or something.

  41. Re:My 18th Birthday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These would be illegal just 10 minutes ago, this is has far as anyone can go! But it's not has far as anyone can go! Someone has can go 9 minutes and 59 seconds farther! Or they has can go farther in the other direction... "See my last living pictures!I would has be dead just 30 seconds later!"

  42. The same has happened from other sources... by altgrr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yesterday, I received five e-mails from "inlove@lovebox.com" - a spam campaign apparently going since May. The Love Box Company is less than impressed. The text of the e-mail is along the lines of "Someone you know has asked us to send you this e-mail. They think you are: sweet, attractive, charming, exciting. To find out who this person is, call this number: 090xxxxxxxx. (calls charged at 2.5p/sec)

    However, I have managed to trace this guy to a limited company, and trace the premium rate number that he asks you to dial. Hopefully, the premium rate number will be shut down, his company can be had for false advertising, and his ISP's account will also be shut down.

    --


    Like car accidents, most hardware problems are due to driver error.
  43. HA! They can't fool me by bigsexyjoe · · Score: 1
    HA! They can't fool me. It rather obvious that no one has ever had a crush on me ever. Shows them!!

    If they sent me an e-mail "Someone doesn't hate you," I might fall for that, but I doubt it.

  44. Well.... by tomblackwell · · Score: 2

    You should be giving unique email addresses to your friends...

    Get a domain, with catch-all email. If you mail to joe, send it with a return address of joe@myemaildomain.com. If you fill out a web form at sears, mark your address as sears@myemaildomain.com. My personal favourite is to mark the email address on my WHOIS form as dontspam@myemaildomain.com. When I go after a spammer, I can refer to that email address, and say that it only exists on my WHOIS form, and that they must be scooping emails from the WHOIS database. Poetic justice.

    1. Re:Well.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You should be giving unique email addresses to your friends...

      FRIEND: Hey, why does your email address say "jimdidit@friends-dont-let-friends-spam.net"?

    2. Re:Well.... by chrisvr · · Score: 2

      Sure, I do this with web forms and the like, but come on, are you going to tell your mom that she should email you at mom@yourdomain.com? And that dad should mail you at dad@yourdomain.com? And that if Aunt Bea asks for your email address, they should tell her it's auntbea@yourdomain.com? That's unrealistic and if you tried to explain why you do it like this, your famaily is going to think you are nuts and/or be really insulted that you think they will give your address to some spammer.

      Like it or not, your close friends and family have to have your correct address, and in my family's case they are clueless enough to a) include that address in the cc line of some dopey "pass it on" email that goes to a bunch of stupid lamers that don't trim the headers and then my email address goes all over AOL and onto the spammers' lists and b) they use all this dopey poll site where you have to enter the email address of your friends and family so they can go answer your poll about what your favorite flavor of ice cream is. Conveniently, the privacy policy of that site even says (if you read it closely) we can use the info you submit however we want, but does the family read or even care about the privacy policy? Noooooooooo, and when I point it out they call me paranoid. Yeah, that's right kids, there are people out there who have made this nifty little poll site just so you can have fun, it doesn't have anything to do with them selling ads or collecting email addresses... and Santa put all those nice presents under the tree last year.

      There is NO way to protect your preferred email address, but thank TPTB for good filters. And if the occasional "This is funny" email from my sister in law ends up in the junk bin, unread... well, that's where it belongs anyway.

    3. Re:Well.... by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 1
      Name: Fred Ferrigno
      Email: slashdot at spamcheck.bizland.com
      I've been doing exactly this for quite some time. I don't tend to run into this problem so much with friends and family, simply because my friends and family have other ways of getting ahold of me than email. Like swinging by my room, for example. That, or there's the trusty telephone, or even IM. When real people ask for my email, I typically give them my school address, and they promptly forget it anyway.

      Of course, I could always tell people to use fred@spamcheck.bizland.com, and they would think it's my 'actual' address.
  45. saw this and figured that by AssFace · · Score: 1

    I got one and was dumb enough to put in a few emails and then realized it had to be a system where they just then collect those addresses and spam them.
    I thought it was both ultra-sleazy, and also a bit clever.

    --

    There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
  46. My own tests show they are spammers by __aazcnn6221 · · Score: 1

    I got an email from someonelikesyou.com some time ago. Since I own my own domain, I made up a number of ficticious email addresses. Suprise, suprise! Those email addresses shortly started receiving a lot of spam, as well as continued "some one likes you" messages even after I followed their procedures for removing the addresses.

  47. This is old idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm 21 years old and I remember either junior or senior year in high school getting an email almost exactly like this. directed me to www.crushlink.com This one though it would give you HINTS as to who the crush was, but the catch was you had to put in email address of "could-be" crushes. So if anybody out there has a first name begining with A and ending with A and a last name with LESS than 8 letters, uh, IM YOUR CRUSH.

    1. Re:This is old idea by Kredal · · Score: 1

      I knew it was you! Let's go out for a stroll on the beach.

      -Andrea Less

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
  48. Someonelikesyou/crushlink by AussiePenguin · · Score: 1

    I was getting some spam from crushlink and it said a crush had entered my email address and I had to list all my crushes to see if it was one of them. Being the cynical one that I am, there was no way I was going to even verify my own email address, let alone give them more without verifying crushlink first! Well found it's in the same /24 as someonelikes you which I later got email from and it's owned by a 'direct' marketing company Jumpstart Technologies http://www.jtllc.com/. (Yep just as the artile says)

    --

    Jeremy
    Melbourne, Australia
    Jabber Australia

  49. Only on Slashnerd by snatchitup · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Leave it to nerds to be the only ones falling for the "Somebody has a crush on you gag." Yeah right, as if anybody thinks they need to secretly admire your bolonga tits, when they know all they have to do is walk up and say, "If you eat me, you can treat me to dinner."

    1. Re:Only on Slashnerd by nuggetman · · Score: 1

      Leave it to nerds to be the only ones falling for the "Somebody has a crush on you gag."

      Leave it to nerds? Tell this to my idiot teenybopper/punk friends.

      --
      ...and that's all there is to it.
  50. sigh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh CowboyNeal, why haven't I heard back from you? ...damn insensitive clod...

  51. Yep... by netphilter · · Score: 1

    They do...at least Crushlink does. I got one and immediately dumped email address of co-workers who I knew were probably trying to repay me for a prank I had played. Sure enough...it appears we were meant for each other!

    --
    "Herbivores eat well cause their food never, ever runs."
    1. Re:Yep... by chez69 · · Score: 0

      In other words, hold my hand

      --
      PHP is the solution of choice for relaying mysql errors to web users.
  52. I've always thought so... by RainbowSix · · Score: 2

    If you think about it, the is a great business model (in some eyes). They send out emails to people who have crushes and it sends them to a website where they have to sign up for things to learn who it is. Since crushes are secret and be for jokes even, they can randonly send it to arbitrary people to get them to sign up for things even if there is no real crush because nobody knows there is no person on the other end. Bam, spam but with a seemingly legit premise. I get emails all the time but I'm a nerd so I know it isn't legit :)

    --
    --------
    It's OK to be social, just don't tell anyone about it.
  53. Does this mean... by Wdomburg · · Score: 5, Funny

    Noone really has a crush on the support alias for my company? I don't know how I'm going to break the news to it.

    1. Re:Does this mean... by kieran · · Score: 1

      And I'd better tell our NOC they can put away the aftershave - that gang-bang they were hoping for isn't going to materialise.

  54. Same as MCI by fdiskne1 · · Score: 1

    This is a similar marketing campaign as MCI had several years ago called "Friends and Family". You would give them the phone number of someone you call frequently and if they change their phone service to MCI, you get a better rate on phone calls to them. It's just a massive pyramid scheme.

    --
    But why is the rum gone?
    1. Re:Same as MCI by bluGill · · Score: 2

      No, that was not a pyramid scheme. A pyramid scheme requires you to get more people signed up under you. With friends and Family even if you were the last in the family/friend circle to sign up you got the better rates. A pyramid collappes as eventially there is nobody to sign up. Friends and family doesn't have to collapse, eventially everyone is saving money on the plan. A rather cool marketing scheme.

      Mind you MCI wasn't always the best deal, and there are plenty of reasons to hate MCI. That scheme wasn't one (unless you got asked to switch and didn't want to).

  55. 99.9% confidence by tuxedo-steve · · Score: 2

    I received an email along these lines from sendacrush.com only a couple of weeks ago, on one of my spam-only hotmail accounts that I've never given out to a human being.

    I sent a complaint to an address I found on the site, but quite predictably got no response. The sending of unsolicited email is illegal; all we have to do is prove they've been doing this beyond reasonable doubt. I think a class-action full of slashdotters who quite evidently nobody has a crush on will more than fulfil that requirement. Who's up for it? :)

    --
    - SMJ - (It's not just a name: it's a bad aftertaste.)
    1. Re:99.9% confidence by Nonesuch · · Score: 1
      Tuxedo-steve writes:
      The sending of unsolicited email is illegal;

      It is? Please cite the specific law that states this?

      SendaCrush is based in California:

      California's anti-spam law requires unsolicited messages to include a viable return address or a toll-free phone number that recipients can use to tell the sender to stop sending documents. The statute also requires unsolicited e-mail to include "ADV:," for advertisement, in the subject line of the message--or in cases where the advertisements relate to adult material, "ADV:ADLT." Violating the law is a misdemeanor.
      So assuming SendaCrush follows these guidelines, their spam is legal under California law.
  56. I'm too smart to fall for this by gila_monster · · Score: 2, Funny

    because Miss Cleo told me not to answer these things. She's saved me a lot of money, let me tell you!

    --
    Ad luna, Alicia! Ad luna!
    1. Re:I'm too smart to fall for this by Coke+in+a+Can · · Score: 1

      Good for you, I was warned too myself, by the file that nice program SirCam sent me.

    2. Re:I'm too smart to fall for this by Xenographic · · Score: 1

      I can picture it now :]

      "I see your future... you will soon be conned out of money. That will be $19.95, please."

  57. Someone's operating the scam in Holland too by hrm · · Score: 4, Funny

    A couple of weeks ago I received a SMS message that started with "Iemand vindt je leuk, en heeft ons jouw nummer achtergelaten..." ("Someone likes you and has left your number with us", original Dutch maintained for Google searches).

    Oh, speaking of googling, there was a hilarious spelling mistake at the end "Wil je weten wie je geheime *aanbieder* is?" ("Do you want to know who your secret admirer is", except they put an 'e' in "aanbidder" where a 'd' should be, "aanbieder" means "provider")

    I couldn't find a reference on the internet to this operation, so I figured it might be legit. I called to the number they gave: 09062001372 (couple dozen eurocents a minute). They pulled the same routine as described above. I had to enter my own phone number (as if they didn't have it) then take a guess as to who left my number in the first place (I gave a bogus number). Then I was promised they'd SMS the number of my secret provider, but of course they never did.

    I suppose this scam pays off quite well. I'm a pretty suspicious person as a rule, but in this case, especially after I couldn't find any information about it on the internet, I just had to check it out. They got about 3 minutes worth of high phone rates out of me.

    1. Re:Someone's operating the scam in Holland too by 742Evergreen · · Score: 1

      I have gotten the same message twice now. I called the first time, because I was curious (lonely).

      The way I understand it, it only gives you the number if you guess correctly. I was allowed to fill in 3 other phone numbers. I didn't leave a single one, because I figured that would just make 3 other people receive a deceptive message.

      So, that is the story about me remaining single, tune in tomorrow for the exciting sequel!

  58. temerity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "temerity," who the fuck uses the word temerity? It doesn't even fit. Temerity, geez us, take the thesaurus off your desktop now.

    1. Re:temerity by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 2

      You should try reading the definition before makeing such a brash pronouncement. The word actually fits where it was used. In case you're interested, The definition is here. Some of us actually enjoy the English language as it was meant to be spoken; not just as monosylabic sound bites.

      --
      They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
      Ben
  59. Sweden is targetted as well by Flu · · Score: 1
    Hopefully, not so many people are trapped by the spammer anymore, since it was written about in the largest newspapers in sweden.

    Actually, in Sweden, it could be fraud to fool anyone to call a premium-rate service witouth notifying the caller (callee?) about the cost. Unfortunately, the swedish allmänna reklamationsnämnden (Better Business Bureau) don't accept claims on less than 300 SEK (~30).

    /FLu

  60. Some addresses to feed into their system by rongage · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, if it's addresses they want, why not give them some addresses to play with...

    • uce@ftc.gov
    • billg@microsoft.com
    • hostmaster@verio.net - their hosting provider
    • root@someoneyouknow.com
    • nccs-sf@fbi.gov

    This could be "educational"...

    --
    Ron Gage - Westland, MI
    1. Re:Some addresses to feed into their system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When a site makes me enter an e-mail address I enter webmaster@[crappysitename].com Their scripts almost always accept their own webmaster address. So they get their own spam, hehe.

  61. Huh? There's Never any News in August by dilute · · Score: 1

    This is pathetic.

    Go to the beach, folks, 'cause there ain't gonna be any real news till after Labor Day.

    1. Re:Huh? There's Never any News in August by Maran · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      The beach? But that's outside, in the sun. Remember, you're dealing with slashdot here.

      Maran

    2. Re:Huh? There's Never any News in August by Mr.Sharpy · · Score: 1

      I remember reading a story on Slate around this time last year about that very phenomenon. The author lamented the boredom that August always brings to journalists, and he hoped that September would bring something newsworthy. I remembered that story on Sept. 11, I though it was sad irony.

  62. Mum?? by stere0 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Is that you???

    --
    Trollem mirabilem hanc subnotationis exigiutas non caperet
  63. My solution by dr_dank · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I got these stupid e-mails too, but they wouldn't release the address of your so-called crush until you furnish them with e-mail address after e-mail address.

    Instead of putting down bogus addresses, I submitted every abuse@{$insert ISP here} address and anti-spam address that I could think of. That'll give them something to think about.

    --
    Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    1. Re:My solution by djtack · · Score: 1

      hrmmm... if I was a spammer I'd have a list of adresses/domains to NOT spam. I'm sure they know that people are trying to "poison" their lists.

      abuse@*
      root@*
      postmaster@*
      president@whitehouse.gov
      *@fbi.gov

      etc...

    2. Re:My solution by parkrrrr · · Score: 1

      Yes, but people don't become spammers by thinking.

    3. Re:My solution by A+Rabid+Tibetan+Yak · · Score: 1

      I'm at a college and lots of other people here receive mail from "FunnyCard" / "Mr Smiley" etc. along these lines. I always advise them to fill in:

      admin@thiswebsite.com
      root@thiswebsite.com
      web master@thiswebsite.com
      postmaster@thiswebsite.com

      et. al., until they supply as many as they need to view their card/crush/whatever cheesy thing you can't convince them to delete. Seems to work -- if they're not sending on random spam email then they've got nothing to worry about, if they are, then they reap the benefits :).

      On another note, I recently got mail from Crush007 which is another kettle of fish entirely :). Luckily I figured this one out before filling in any details... have a read of their front page for a laugh.

  64. Jumpstart Technology by AussiePenguin · · Score: 1

    It would appear that Jumpstart Technology (http://www.jtllc.com/) has changed their website so that it no longer says 'Direct Marketing'! Must have been causing them some greif.

    --

    Jeremy
    Melbourne, Australia
    Jabber Australia

  65. idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is news?! What idiot gets an email from a complete stranger to go to a website that has a bunch of ads and enter email addresses of people they know that they think might be the one who had a crush on them? Does it actually take anyone more than three tenths of a second to realize it's an email harvesting scam?!

    I mean.. jesus christ... come on people.... This is as bad as when slashdot posted an article about an anti-spam service you could register your email address with -- only to find out that the service used all of those addresses to build spam lists.

  66. News FLash!!!!! by nochops · · Score: 0

    Spammers lie and cheat!!!!

    Imagine that!

    --
    "A terrorist is someone who has a bomb but doesn't have an air force." -William Blum
  67. I've seen these for match.com and by krinsh · · Score: 1

    adultfriendfinder.com and any of a dozen other 'dating' websites. It's pretty obvious after the first one where they point you directly to the site...! I rate these on par with those "Wasn't last night great?" emails... particularly funny if my wife and I have just come back from a weekend together.

    --
    I think with the interesting people, their lives can't possibly be wrapped up into a nice little package.
    1. Re:I've seen these for match.com and by Junta · · Score: 2

      But potentially not so great if you have come back from a business trip by yourself..

      'honey, I swear I didn't do anything, it's just spam, honest!'

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  68. eCrush spam scam by atomice · · Score: 1

    I entered a-z@mydomain.com into eCrush. These e-mail addresses appeared nowhere else. Slowly, but surely over the next year, each address received an e-mail saying someone had a crush on them...

  69. I got one of those a few weeks ago by DearSlashdot · · Score: 1

    I knew it wasn't true though.
    <sigh>

    --

    "Why should we leave America to go to America Junior?" - H. Simpson, on visiting Canada
  70. wait a minute, you mean by Savatte · · Score: 2

    no one really has a crush on my ferret? I guess that's good, though. She's not really one for long walks on the beach or snuggling while watching movies.

  71. I want revenge, and I bet I'm not alone. by Multiple+Sanchez · · Score: 2

    This one really bugs me. I've been dealing with these bastards' emails for what feels like forever. Every time I go to pine and hit that favorite key combo, M-S-R-F-A, I get more incensed. These companies prey on my friends' insecurities, then usurp *my* time and resources, all so they can build an addition to their garish Malibu beach houses.

    I want revenge. I want to make them pay. I want to find a hole in their system that allows me to exploit *their* resources. Why not write a bot that logs on to their website and enters believable, false email addresses, making their spam lists worthless and chewing up their processor time? There must be a legal way to exact at least an ounce of flesh from these manipulative, bottom-feeding insults to civilized human beings, and I want to hear suggestions.

  72. This girl sent me a message that she had.. by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 2

    .. a crush on me. Turns out she was only after me for my p4 processor.

    Alice is a tease!

  73. other uses for 'Directed Relationship Graphs' by guanxi · · Score: 2

    Think of someone gathering headers from mail servers over a period of time: Marketers, corporate IT depts, law enforcement, whatever else.

    They could learn a lot about you and your contacts without much effort: It's completely automated; no human interaction required.

    Is there any rule against it? You're not opening the e-mails.

    What would you do with the info? I can't think what marketers would do -- maybe target people who have more friends. A business might benefit from a study of how communication and info really flows in their company. For law enforcement, the info could be invaluable in trying to put together a picture of a criminal organization. And don't forget the true innovators, virus writers!

    1. Re:other uses for 'Directed Relationship Graphs' by 4of12 · · Score: 2

      Reminds me of a law enforcement tactic that they bring out every few years.

      Publish in the newspaper a list of names that include some people wanted on outstanding warrants that can't be tracked down, have no fixed address, etc.

      But the advertisement is not "Wanted" rather, it's "Winners of Prizes in our Store Competition! Show up Saturday at 10 am to claim your prize!"

      People actually deliver themselves to the right address, where they are cuffed.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
  74. Just block them... by MarvinMouse · · Score: 2

    I have officially blocked any e-mails coming from crushlink or their servers into my servers because they are basically spam. This happened after two incidents. One day I received 25 e-mails all saying someone had a crush on me... I was a little suspicious, considering I had a girlfriend at the time and none of the e-mails matched with hers.

    Another day I received almost 50 e-mails (I have multiple addresses) including one at an address I haven't used since 1995. And yet, amazingly I am still single.. :-P Obviously, crushlink was just a spammer. So I blocked them as such. Luckily all of their e-mails usually have valid headers (saying they are from an @crushlink.com address). Just in case though, I also went to the effort of blocking the entire range of servers owned by crushlink.

    --
    ~ kjrose
  75. Look at the bright side by sulli · · Score: 2

    It's better than divorce - you get to keep the house.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  76. Obvious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know at least one of these places requires you to list 5-10 emails of people you have a "crush" on in order to figure out who has a crush on you.

    I am not going to do the math, but unless everyone really has 5+ crushes, the value of these things is low. Why would they demand so many addresses if they were not trying to collect addys? I dare say that if they were truely concerned with quality crush-informs, they would not create exponential dilution in their scheme.

    big poopys!

  77. Not sure about any address harvesting going on... by eaolson · · Score: 1
    I received one of these things myself a little while ago, and added a handful of sneakemail (sneakemail.com, great site, but that's neither here nor there) addresses just to see if it was a fraud or not. I got the initial "someone has a crush on you" message to each sneakemail addy, but pretty much nothing since then.

    Maybe they're smart enough to cull these out of their database, but unless that's so, the site doesn't seem to be used for massive email harvesting.

  78. Disposable addresses and Spamgourmet by Balinares · · Score: 5, Informative

    Never sign up anywhere with a real email address.
    Instead, get an account on Spamgourmet, and you'll have as many disposable email addresses as necessary, that will work only as many times as you want. Then they become a direct link to /dev/null, and you never hear about them again.

    Seriously. This service rocks.

    --

    -- B.
    This sig does in fact not have the property it claims not to have.
    1. Re:Disposable addresses and Spamgourmet by mosch · · Score: 2
      I use tagged email addresses to make it easy to tell who is selling my info. I'll put things like 'slashdot.org@mydomain.com' in for my slashdot email address, and 'yahoo.com@mydomain.com' for yahoo, and so on.

      This system makes it relatively easy for me to receive email from people who don't abuse the fact that they know my address, and extremely easy to filter the spammers to /dev/null, or better yet, set them up as spamassassin spamtraps, which will make it so incoming mail messages get automatically added to things like Vipul's Razor before they delete them.

    2. Re:Disposable addresses and Spamgourmet by Anonymous+Cow+herd · · Score: 1

      Never sign up anywhere with a real email address.

      Or, just use your own email address wherever you damn well please, and use SpamBouncer. :-)

      --
      Ita erat quando hic adveni.
    3. Re:Disposable addresses and Spamgourmet by banal+avenger · · Score: 1

      I like that idea. It gives me that holy vindication that I will know who's ass to fry.

      I was careful for a long time with my spam email address from Hotmail, which was at the time ironically spam free. Then I received one of these from sendacrush.com at my real email, to which I didn't respond (Like most intelligent people here, I saw through their plan like Superman through Lois' clothing), but I sent one to my spam address just to see how it works. Those bastards killed that thing.

      Ok, I guess not really killed. My now 2-3 spam messages a day doesn't compare to most people I know who, for some odd reason, continue to use Hotmale.

    4. Re:Disposable addresses and Spamgourmet by Perky_Goth · · Score: 1

      Damn, Great link, thanks!

      Then again... that's what Hotmail is for, right? They even have a nice protection now that i can turn on so i get only mails from a certified list... Which is empty, because who the hell trusts them anyway? :)

      Anytime i want i just deactivate it...

      Then again, not as nice... I'll use your method :) tks, really

    5. Re:Disposable addresses and Spamgourmet by jesterzog · · Score: 2

      That's one of the things I do whenever I give an address to someone I don't trust, but it still doesn't stop other people from giving out a main address that you want to use.

      That's one of the irritating and arguably unethical things that sites like crushmaster and someonelikesyou do -- they corner people in such a way that they can't find out if it's you without entering your real address.

  79. Nearly missed a friend because of spam. by Lispy · · Score: 1

    Got about 5 or 6 of these sms...and i never called back. Then the other day i got a message reading:
    "Hi, surprise! Youll never guess who i am..."
    - the call came from a number in denmark and i didnt call back first.

    Then i remembered that i actually KNOW someone in denmark and i smsed back. It was her!

    Boy, i nearly missed to meet an old friend again just because i get spammed all the time...thats sad.

    cu,
    Lispy

  80. Suspicious Biographies by zangdesign · · Score: 2

    After reading the article, several questions arise - what the hell is mitre.org up to and what culpability do they share in propagating this spam? Did Tseng and Schleier-Smith conduct any of their dot-com building on the federal dime? If so, can they be sued for recovery of wasted tax dollars?

    The main worry here is Mitre. If they are involved in government research, what are these guys up to? Is our government playing games with spam or is there some real, nefarious purpose here?

    --
    To celebrate the occasion of my 1000th post, I will post no more forever on Slashdot. Goodbye.
    1. Re:Suspicious Biographies by Dr.+Scott · · Score: 2, Informative
      The main worry here is Mitre. If they are involved in government research, what are these guys up to? Is our government playing games with spam or is there some real, nefarious purpose here?

      I've worked for MITRE for the past 11 years. We don't do spam. We do systems engineering, R&D, and IT support for the government: originally for the Air Force, then the other armed services, the FAA, and the IRS. MITRE is not an ordinary defense contractor; it comprises three Federally Funded Research and Development Centers. The idea is to provide expert, unbiased technical advice which the customers can't keep in-house and which they can't get from for-profit contractors.

      We always have a bunch of part-time undergraduate co-op students around -- I had one working for me in 2000. The two people named in the Salon article were co-ops in the nanotech research department in 1999. I'm quite sure that their duties didn't include a "someone likes you" spam engine, and I imagine they'll get an earful -- if they are still working for us, three years later -- from their unlucky manager.

      I don't think it was very nice of Salon to link MITRE into this story. If you google for Tseng and Schleier-Smith, you find the MITRE link. If you paste that link into your story, it looks like MITRE is somehow connected. But we aren't.

  81. Crushlink *do* harvest random email addresses by Gossy · · Score: 1

    I once set up about 10 or so dummy passport accounts (don't ask why - long story) .. anyway, none of these were ever used, and never handed out to anyone.

    Then one day crushlink emails me to 5 of these dummy accounts telling each of them that someone has a crush on me! The only way the addresses could have been aquired would be by trawling through the microsoft site looking for addresses.

    I also note with interest a link in the salon article to http://www.rhythm.cx/crushlink/ - some guy who set up an email address just to try and catch crushlink out, and got an email from 'jennyslist.com'. So that is where jennyslist got those email addresses of mine..

  82. I'm shocked by Sloppy · · Score: 1

    I'm shocked to learn that some of my spam may turn out to be fraudulent. What's next? Is Slashdot/Salon going to have a story about Work At Home opportunities and penis enlargers?

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  83. Phone numbers (vaguely offtopic) by ranulf · · Score: 2
    Hey chap!

    I didn't realise that 03 had already been designated as geographic. I thought it was just reserved. Good to see a comprehensive list anyway - I remember seeing a very old version of this list once back when phone numbers were simple.

    Interestingly, I notice that there aren't any Birmingham 0121 8xx or 0121 9xx numbers, so I wonder how long it'll be before Birmingham numbers migrate to 0121 8xxx yyyy and so that can be renumbered 024 8xxx yyyy. That'd be good.

    I found another page that looks pretty interesting too.

    1. Re:Phone numbers (vaguely offtopic) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember seeing a very old version of this list once back when phone numbers were simple.

      I remember, when I were a young'un, my phone number was 563 and I had to wait ages for a line outside my village. I used to dial '0' and get number unobtainable.

      We never had none of this 'System X' rubbish, but were 'appy.

    2. Re:Phone numbers (vaguely offtopic) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      when I were a young'un, my phone number was 563

      As recently as 15 years ago, my phone number was 205 and the whole phone number was only 8 digits long including the leading 0.

      The public phone box in the village was 200, so our house must have been the 5th in the village to have a phone!

  84. SUE SUE SUE by 3733+3 · · Score: 1

    Can someone please file a class action lawsuit?

    Some FTC law must have been violated.

  85. I do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm just really shy...

  86. In related news... by wetdogjp · · Score: 1

    Salon is running an article about how that cryptic e-mail saying you can enlarge your penis in 10 days may not be what it seems. Portrayed as services to increase length and girth, some voice concerns that some such sites -- most with falsified WHOIS records -- are preying on people's insecuritites to build spam lists. One site in particular, penis-enlargement-guaranteed.com, has the temerity to assume that your penis is small and unsatisfying.

    Well, I'm certainly glad Slashdot was so gracious as to inform me that this particular spam was not legitimate. Thanks, guys!

  87. The thing is by cmburns69 · · Score: 2

    And its not like you can even trust the answer it gives! If I enter the email address of somebody I know, but don't like, for curiosities sake, they will recieve an email saying 'somebody likes you'. If they guess my email, it will say that I like them, which is not the case.

    I almost worked for one of these companies, but I remembered that I have a concience.

    How do these companies manage not to get blacklisted by lots of mailservers?

    "See my vest see my vest, made from real gorilla chest"

    --
    Online Starcraft RPG? At
    Dietary fiber is like asynchronous IO-- Non-blocking!
  88. Previous host was Rackspace by lute3 · · Score: 1
    This isn't just for Dot-COMs--It spread through Dot-DE as well.
    I kind of hate to say this since I like Rackspace, but no one else seems to have mentioned it..

    Here's my story (all of this transpired on June 19, 2002)..
    I knew very quickly that this thing is sending bot-forged unsolicited emails.. I'm the webmaster for a friend's domain in Germany--let's say "somedomain.de." I setup the webmaster address to point to my email at Yahoo!. I setup one more alias to point to her email address on her webmail (I think on Web.de). I received an email at my Yahoo! account, sent to "figlio@somedomain.de." Guess what? That's not one of the two accounts that have ever existed for somedomain.de. Where the heck could the "figlio" have come from!? Is it a handle that someone has in another European country and the Someonelikesyou.com PHP bot took that and applied to a random domain? I think so...

    So, I did a whois on Someonelikesyou.com's IP and the IP block was owned by Rackspace. I emailed abuse@rackspace.com. The next day, there was some sort of "We're down for maintenance--sorry for any inconvenience" message. I guess they finally found a shameless host with Jumpstart--or maybe they'll be somewhere else next week.

    1. Re:Previous host was Rackspace by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Quote:

      Hmmm...mm...uhh...I guess I'm not really as creative as I thought.


      Damn. I don't have any mod points to mark this as "insightfull."

      --
      They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
      Ben
    2. Re:Previous host was Rackspace by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      This is why rackspace is blocked by SPEWS.

      Don't even both with abuse@rackspace, thay have never removed a spammer.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  89. Actual e-mail from crushlink.com by KPU · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Guess what... you've got a secret admirer!
    Want to find out who it is? Come visit...

    http://www.CrushLink.com

    Email address:
    Invitation code:

    Make sure you enter in this information
    exactly as shown above.

    See you soon!

    Sincerely,
    The Crush Master

    ---

    PS. This is not junk email. You've received it
    because someone *you know* came to CrushLink and
    confessed an interest in you! Maybe it was that
    hottie from English class or the cute one at the
    party last weekend or maybe--well, we can't even
    give you a hint until you come to CrushLink.com.

    PPS. If you do not wish to receive any more of
    these messages from CrushLink, please visit
    http://www.CrushLink.com/block.php3

  90. Verio Wins Spam King Award. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Verio Wins Spam King Award for favoring their paying customers (read as SPAMMERS) over the thousands of innocent victims. Have a look at http://www.machineroom.org to see it.

  91. Of no interest to anyone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As recently as 15 years ago, my phone number was 205 and the whole phone number was only 8 digits long including the leading 0.

    Okay, this was about 1990 for me. The whole number was 9 digits, we had to dial '9' to get out to the local STD code, which meant we had wierd-ass numbers depending on where you are calling from. The phone box was 211.

    In some parts of Somerset, there are still 5-digit numbers I think.

    1. Re:Of no interest to anyone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The public phone box in the village was 200
      The phone box was 211.

      There should be a database of public phone box numbers and their locations.

      I remember my friend like phoning one payphone from another within eyeshot and waiting for random people to answer. This always seemed fun as he could see who they were, even though they thought they were anonymous!

    2. Re:Of no interest to anyone. by rawles · · Score: 1

      Here's some links you guys might be interested in, containing payphone databases.

      Sadly, I couldn't find something similar in the UK.

    3. Re:Of no interest to anyone. by rawles · · Score: 1

      Of course, he means payphone-project.COM .

      If only these interweb dialling codes (TLDs) were as simple as UK dialling codes.

  92. crushlink == someone likes you by rexroof · · Score: 1

    I don't know if it's been mentioned above, but crushlink and someonelikesyou are both on the same IP block with apparently the same owners.

    I hate them so much i put lines like this in my sendmail access file:

    65.19.140.27 550 SOMEONE HATES YOU .COM FUCK YOU AND YOUR HARVEST SITE
    65.19.140.29 550 SOMEONE HATES YOU .COM FUCK YOU AND YOUR HARVEST SITE

    I also really hate Traffic Magnet, but thats another story all together.

  93. I spoke with this guy by Dr.+Zowie · · Score: 2
    ... three years ago. Same scam. Tracked it down via domain registry and whois, and called the fellow at home. It was being run out of a dorm at UC Berkeley, and the guy claimed that the guess-and-email technique was to save peoples' privacy. I pointed out that he had to be lying because of the cascading emails, and he claimed that it was a bug that would be fixed ``very soon''.

    Too bad to see that he's still scamming -- he was very smooth, and I hoped he'd graduate and go into something more innocuous, like pimping.

  94. They work at Mitre? by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2

    According to the article the 2 guys who run this work at Mitre. I wonder how Mitre would feel knowing 2 of it's nanotechnology staff were engaged in fraud.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  95. No reply by whitelabrat · · Score: 1

    I just got one of those messages yesterday. I got spooked because I've got a girl, and it smelled like spam. The privacy policy read like, "You will get spammed". I've done the unsubscribe thing and I'm going to keep track of any spam I get in the future for leagal reasons. My account doesn't get spam, so if I do, I'll know where it's comming from...

  96. Someone has a crush on you... by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    Mod me up and I'll give you a hint!

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  97. Do you have a crush on the CrushLink founder? by frenetic3 · · Score: 2, Informative

    If so, let him know -- I was pretty surprised when someone had a crush on junk@rpgexchange.com, a dummy address I have never used or published ever :)

    "Disclosure to Third Parties

    We may occasionally, for entertainment purposes, disclose non-personally identifiable information to registered Crushlink users about other users.

    We do not share our mailing list with any other company, person or entity."

    For your entertainment purposes, the CrushLink founder Greg Tseng's contact emails at Stanford (physics dept.) and his Harvard alum email:

    gytseng@stanford.edu

    gtseng@post.harvard.edu

    Show him you have a crush on him too by offering him things like "Free Inkjet Printer Cartridges", the "Lowest Mortgage Rates Around", how to make "$204,000 in 2 months", and hell how to "Increase Your Energy and Sex Drive!" :)

    -fren

    --
    "Where are we going, and why am I in this handbasket?"
    1. Re:Do you have a crush on the CrushLink founder? by iainl · · Score: 1

      Frenetic3 posted on Slashdot at 3ish:

      "junk@rpgexchange.com, a dummy address I have never used or published ever"

      D'oh! :)

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    2. Re:Do you have a crush on the CrushLink founder? by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 2

      So, did you also register these addresses at Crushlink and SomeoneLikesYou?

      --
      They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
      Ben
  98. HERE ARE SIX SIMPLE THINGS YOU CAN DO TO HELP KEEP by newton34 · · Score: 0

    1) NEVER RESPOND TO SPAM Oh sure, they say they'll take your name off the list, but they're lying. What they really want to do is confirm that they've got a live address. Also, if you respond, they'll sell your address to every other spammer on the planet meaning you'll soon be flooded with even more spam. 2) DON'T POST YOUR ADDRESS ON YOUR WEBSITE It seems like a good idea at the time, but posting your email address on your personal home page is just an invitation to spammers. Spammers and the people who sell spamming as a business have software that "harvests" email addresses from the Net. This software crawls through the Internet seeking text strings that are -something-@-something-.-something-. When it finds one, it catalogs it on a database of other email addresses to be used to send spam. 3) USE A SECOND EMAIL ADDRESS IN NEWSGROUPS Newsgroups are the great email address gathering ground for spammers. If you post to a group, you're going to get spam -- it is just a matter of time. So how are you supposed to participate? Use a different email address than the one you use for talking to friends and relatives. In other words, have a public address and a private address. You'll just have to deal with the spam in your public account. 4) DON'T GIVE YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS WITHOUT KNOWING HOW IT WILL BE USED If a website is asking for your email address, they want to use it for something. Be sure you know what. Read the terms of use and privacy statements of any site before telling them your address. Ask yourself some simple questions. Are they going to share or sell my address? Do I want emails from this website? Do I trust them? Is it worth the risk? If you can't answer these questions satisfactorily, if you can't find their privacy statement, don't tell them your address. 5) USE A SPAM FILTER While there is no such thing as a perfect filter, anti-spam software can help keep spam at manageable level. Some of it is cumbersome, some works better than others, some even requires that you let your email messages go through another system for storage and cleaning. But right now, that's the way it works. 6) NEVER BUY ANYTHING ADVERTISED IN SPAM The reason that people spam is because they can make money. They make money, like all advertisers, by convincing people to buy a product. If no one buys the things advertised in spam, companies will quit paying spammers to advertise their products. Even if you do all of these things, you could still get spam. Just remember to send your spam to the Spam Recycling Center so that we can forward them to the Federal Trade Commission and to the spam filter developers so that they can continue to try to stop the spam before it gets to you.

    --
    look my sig changes!!! nrrt mf oci jdabi.o!!! z..a ir kot gh-ntbk{{{
  99. They timed their spam to me perfectly. by ChicagoFan · · Score: 1
    I received spam from SomeoneLikesYou.com.

    Normally, I would have assumed it was a scam. My friends aren't the type to do cutesy things like that. But on the other hand, the spam arrived on my birthday! So I figured, "No, it has to be legit, a message from one of my friends. I don't get much spam; what are the chances a spam of this particular kind would arrive exactly on my birthday?"

    When I went to the site, they wanted a name, so I put in a fake name, and then they wanted more info, and I figured, "The hell with this, whoever sent me a birthday message, too bad for them. I'm not giving this place more info." But by that point I had already confirmed my email by entering my name, since I was so certain it was legit due to the birthday timing.

    It's nice to know my initial instincts were correct, and that I didn't miss some nice birthday message from a friend. But their scam did manage to harvest my address due to perfectly coincidental timing on their part.

    ChicagoFan

  100. and here's a picture of the CrushLink founder by frenetic3 · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.mitre.org/research/nanotech/pictures/ts eng.gif

    looks like he needs all the help he can get :)

    -fren

    --
    "Where are we going, and why am I in this handbasket?"
  101. Old news... to me, anyway by Chmarr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've been onto their particular game for about half a year now, as evidenced in a warning I wrote here.

    In general, you should never give anyone's email address out. Ie, treat it like a phone number; it's not yours to give out, it's the owner's.

    I treat the 'send this to a friend' thing in the same way. If you read the privacy statements of a lot of web sites, you'll see that it refers to your privacy, but doesn't mention anything about the privacy of your friends' email addresses that you happen to type into those 'send this to a friend' boxes.

  102. old news by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2

    Have you heard about that Richard Stallman guy...? He's working on a full-featured text editor for Unix! We won't have to use ed anymore!

  103. Perfect for your own Blacklist by crimoid · · Score: 2

    Just create a bunch of email addresses whose sole purpose is to catch SPAM to feed your own blacklist. Its great cause you don't need to worry about finding SPAM, it is automatically sent to you.

  104. The way you *should* respond to spam by macdaddy · · Score: 2

    Something I started doing recently was replying to spam with a message that contained web bugs. The web bugs were links to Linux ISO images. If only a couple of those spammers clicked the OK button (or if their MUA didn't ask and just downloaded) their BW would be wasted for hours. :)

    1. Re:The way you *should* respond to spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      macdaddy suggests
      Something I started doing recently was replying to spam with a message that contained web bugs. The web bugs were links to Linux ISO images. If only a couple of those spammers clicked the OK button (or if their MUA didn't ask and just downloaded) their BW would be wasted for hours. :)
      Sure, but what about the bandwidth of the poor sites hosting those images?
  105. slashdot assholes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You guys are fucking bastards, deep-linking to the printable version of the page so Salon loses ad revenue. /. has no consideration

  106. Different to my one by superpeach · · Score: 1

    I got an email yesterday saying someone had a crush on me, but it wasn't like this one (although I have seen this one asking for emails a year ago). The one I got yesterday wanted me to phone them to find out who it was - maybe it is similar but they are trying to get your phone numbers instead... or maybe they just plan on making money on the call which costs 2.5p a second! (thats about 1.5 cents a second)

  107. SomeoneLikesYou... by suwain_2 · · Score: 2

    ...is in bed with RackSpace?

    I got "bit" by SomeoneLikesYou repeatedly. Someone (who I don't even know) sent someone a legitimate crush, and they guessed a friend's address, who guessed me and all my friends... In my idiocy, I put in a list of addresses. They all got mail. I figured it out, and had a friend with his own domain setup some test accounts. I "guessed" their addresses, and, sure enough, they got mail right away.

    I quickly sent mail to RackSpace, informing them that it was sending 'fraudulent' mail, and that I was 95% sure that it was being used for nothing other than address harvesting. I also mentioned the clearly-falsified headers. All I ever received was an automated reply. And... The site is still up.

    Other people have said before that RackSpace knowingly harbors a bunch of spammers. I really would have no regrets blocking the entirety of RackSpace's netblocks.

    This is surprisingly brilliant for a spammer, but that only makes me more angry. However, I created an account with them, and checked "Do not send me mail" option -- and have not received mail from them since. (In addition, the account they have gets NO spam.) So, while it's likely that they're making a huge database of spam addresses, I haven't gotten spammed yet (or else my hosting company has some REALLY good spam filters that I don't about), and they even seem to take removal requests.

    --
    ________________________________________________
    suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
  108. Her dog gets email? by Disco+Stu · · Score: 1

    "My dog has gotten 'someone has a crush on you' e-mail messages -- she's a cute dog, but no one has a crush on her," says Karen Demars, co-founder of eCrush.

    Why the hell does her dog have an email address? Why do I suspect that Karen Demars is exaggerating a little bit?

    1. Re:Her dog gets email? by Control-Z · · Score: 2, Informative

      People do all sorts of cute things with their dogs, like get them credit cards and such.

    2. Re:Her dog gets email? by schon · · Score: 1

      Why the hell does her dog have an email address?

      Well, according to a 1995 study, 33% of pet owners leave answering machine messages for their pet when they're away... so maybe she's from the Ozarks or something, and figured she'd do the same thing with email? :o)

  109. sendacrush, sneaky bastards. by MERVERNATOR · · Score: 1

    I was sent one of these things from sendacrush.com at some point,.. exactly like this, the mail subject says "someone you know has a crush on you" however, when you open the e-mail the little print in there says "someone you know thought you had a crush on them" but most people dont see that part and they just fly over to the site, and it takes you directly to a page that says "enter the e-mail address of the person you think has a crush on you" so people start pumping in their friends addresses, and before you know it, all those people are getting the same e-mail you just got. I didnt see anyplace in the site to "pay" for your answer, probably because there is no answer since it was sneaky BS to begin with. I got one of these things, saw the game they were playing and immediately sent them a vulgar nasty e-mail demanding I be removed and also not get another one, even if somoene enters my address, or Id take legal action..... I havent goten one since. ..sigh.. the net certainly isnt what it used to be.

  110. I have a crush by jhunsake · · Score: 1

    I have a crush on gytseng@stanford.edu and jssmith@stanford.edu, don't you?

  111. I had a suspicion by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

    I was wary of these emails I was getting so I set up some sneakemail accounts and voila, I got all kinds of spam.

  112. Directed Relationship Graphs by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 2
    Yeah, I know this is kind of off topic...but directed relationship graphs remind me of something kind of amusing.

    Back in school, one evening, for entertainment, a few of us made a directed relationship graph of the people in our student house (about 60 or 70 people). An arrow from X to Y meant that X was interested in Y in more than a just friendly way.

    We then made a copy, with the vertices of the graph unlabeled, and posted it on the house bulletin board, as a puzzle.

    People did a lot better than I would have expected at finding their vertice on the unlabeled graph.

  113. Inisidious by imkonen · · Score: 1
    I've had pretty good luck keeping my normal email account relatively spam free by using sacrificial hotmail accounts when I have to give out my email address to a spam harvester. This technique completely defeats that plan...I can't even convince most of my friends and family to stop using Outlook, how the hell am I going to explain to them that I never want my email address submitted to a website? I can't give them the "sacrificial" addresses...the whole point is that I want to be able to get email from these people without sorting through all the crap.

    Yea...yea...make all the jokes about me not having to worry about anyone having a crush on me. This technique will spin off (if it already hasn't) in countless other BS "services" that will try to trick people into giving out their friends emails. Just a couple of weeks ago my boss sent our whole lab a link from this website that sends practical joke emails to your "friends"... http://cgi.slygreetings.com/page.pl?page=0&aut h=

  114. Just don't give away your email address by mosch · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Not giving your email address works works really well, unless:
    • you have a job that requires that you post on public, technical mailing lists.
    • you have a job where your email address ends up in whois records.
    • you're the postmaster, hostmaster or any other sort of contact for a company.
    • you don't need your email address to be publicly available for business reasons.
    • somebody forwards an email that you sent them to a public mailing list.
    • you've had the same, well-known email address since the days when it was considered a good thing to publicize your address.
    • one of your friends or business associates gets a virus that causes your email address to end up getting sent off to a mailing list or something.
    • your dipshit ISP allows VRFY.
    • etc, etc, etc.
    There's not always an easy way to keep from getting spam, even if you're relatively careful with your addresses.
  115. Crush on the debian project! by sfraggle · · Score: 1
    --
    were you expecting to see a sig here? perhaps you'd rather see the inside of an ambulance!
  116. Taking advantafe of by Che+Geuvarra · · Score: 1

    People's nember one insecurities, is there nothing lower? Oh I forgot spam! Perhaps the problem is that so many people to dupe and so many loopholes. Sharing of adresses for entertainment purposes, yeah their entertainment no doubt topurchase dates. but i digress, anyway while i do not advocate cyberterrorism, i think that perhaps they founders need to have many crushes on them? It is by those full email boxes that they might actually get a clue.

    --
    -For it is the very essence of imperialism to turn information systems into wild, bloodthirsty animals-
  117. That was easy by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 2
    Skimmed the article on Salon. Found where the article listed the domains. My sendmail access file now includes:
    # Other SPAM senders
    moneyworld.com REJECT
    ...
    mystarworld.com REJECT
    crushlink.com REJECT
    someonelikesyou.com REJECT
    --
    They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
    Ben
  118. Someone has a crush on the debian project by sfraggle · · Score: 3, Funny


    http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2001/debi an -project-200108/msg00016.html

    --
    were you expecting to see a sig here? perhaps you'd rather see the inside of an ambulance!
    1. Re:Someone has a crush on the debian project by zCyl · · Score: 2

      I bet it was Redhat...

  119. someone has a crush on root!?!? by andreass · · Score: 1

    We get a few of these a month actually sent to root@speakeasy.net. Hmm, does anyone think this is a real person -- I sort of doubt it. Although we always look suspiciously at the other members of the engineering group that gets root@ mail whenever we get these, its more for our own entertainment.

  120. DogChat by keller999 · · Score: 1

    "My dog has gotten 'someone has a crush on you' e-mail messages -- she's a cute dog, but no one has a crush on her," ... and you have an e-mail address for your dog because.....

  121. I got hit by this too by i_am_pi · · Score: 1

    Damn them, I thought it was real, because i had'nt recieved any other spam on that account, plus, one of the people that i liked had that email address.

    The "SomeoneLikesYou" site sends out ads that "someone likes you" to whoever you guess..

    pope@vatican.va and postmaster@goatse.cx are going to be surprised.....

  122. Re:Who has a message for you -OT by mr_z_beeblebrox · · Score: 1

    Good luck to you. You have probably already checked, but dice.com is an excellent free service.

  123. There's more than one way to LART these people by Huw · · Score: 1

    I had a bit of spam today alleging that someone fancied me, and inviting me to phone a premium rate number to find out who it was. Thing is, it didn't actually *say* that it was a premium rate number. In the UK, the regulator (ICSTIS) requires that the charges for the call are attached to all advertising for these services. I've dropped a little e-mail to ICSTIS regarding this. Hopefully it'll turn into a very nice LART for this spammer.

    --

    --
    Windows XP. From the people who brought you Edlin.
  124. Ah well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lets post some mail-adress here sales@the-emailcenter.com

  125. Winners unite by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    Thus must be how winners of the Darwin Award meet up.

    1. Re:Winners unite by shogun · · Score: 2

      Generally its a little too late for them to meet if they've already won....

    2. Re:Winners unite by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      (* Generally its a little too late for them to meet if they've already won.... *)

      Okay then, "contestants". Actually the award does not say they have to die, only ruin their reproductive organs thru dumb but purposeful behavior.

  126. I have proof.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I saw a similar one to this at Valentine's. Right away I saw it was probably a spam-generator, so I created an bogus account on my mail server and gave them that address. Within two weeks I was receiving 150 spams/day.

    If you are an administrator, WARN YOUR USERS before you're innundated with spam!

  127. In switzerland too by roady · · Score: 1

    Got the same scam via SMS in switzerland too.

    Almost called, I thought it might be my GF.

  128. it took that long? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ive known about that thing for almost a year now..... (and so has everyone in my address book :( )
    but since they don't tell you they are going to send mail to each of the names you enter isn't there some privacy act or at least something against that?
    -frost

  129. [OT] My first real, true Kiss by stere0 · · Score: 2

    It was from the other girl, Caroline. We were both nine; she had brown hair that went down to her neck, good grades in class, brown eyes and a gorgeous smile. We started "going out together" (read: spending time together holding hands and being too embarassed to say anything) after I sent her a love letter I had written on thick, orange paper. I think I still have the reply she sent me somewhere.

    Anyway, we started spending time together, and one day we went up to her bedroom. We were both standing in a corner; she convinced me that I should go first. We closed our eyes and I gave her a peck on the cheek, then a rash kiss on her mouth. I didn't know what to say for a couple of minutes, and neither did she.

    Well, that's it. I haven't seen her for a couple of years but I still remember how we both felt. What about you?

    P.S.: This will probably get moderated down, but thinking about it made me feel great. Thanks! :-D

    --
    Trollem mirabilem hanc subnotationis exigiutas non caperet
  130. Here's an idea by MasterOfDisaster · · Score: 1

    Why doesn't someone set up a simmilar scam, only insted of harvesting emails after n have been entered, it would display a little warning about such scams, and then send the user to an internet privacy site. If you DO take the emails, and send the same message to them, you could (on the warning screen after THEY entered emails) show who the spam was really from. Kind of a warning to not trust them with your email again.

    --
    The opinions in this post are ficticious. Any similarity to actual opinions, real or imagined, is purely coincidental.
  131. Peer Pressure on crushlink's founders... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The premise is simple: Show them the "love" that they've shown us. Crushlink the hell out of the founders. Here are some starting points to tracking them down.

    Crushlink/SomeoneLikesYou founders:
    Johann Schleier-Smith, with a current student email address of jssmith@standford.edu A quick Yahoo! search also turned up jschleie@piper28.tjhsst.edu (his high school account), johann@dc.net, and nkjr68a@prodigy.com.

    Greg Tseng, a more common name, but the krazeeazndude@yahoo.com, greg3586@yahoo.com, and flopur@yahoo.com all show a location of Fremont, CA. According to the story and everything else I've found, this punk is still at Stanford with his butt buddy Johann, so I'd say those stand a good chance of being recently made accounts. Definitely not his primary, but still recent.

    Phone numbers while at Harvard were (617)493-6344 (Greg) and 493-3313 (Johann). Not that hard to find their current numbers, either, for those who are into that sort of thing. They both attended Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology in Alexadria, VA. They look like they were definitely teacher's pets. htt://www.tjhsst.edu/contact.html gives you plenty of guesses the next time someone crushes you. I mean, we love their teachers as much as they did, right?

    Then again, that's probably not a good idea. How about this one: develop a "crush" on their current mentors. Wonder if that would do anything to their grades? Gotta find a way to clue the faculty in as to who runs crushlink, or it's no good. hmmm. I think I'm getting a warm fuzzy for Professor W.E. Moerner wmoerner@standford.edu.

    BTW, Johann has a sister named Monika who also went to Harvard. Could probably dig more up on her, too.

    ...and remember, all this information was freely available off the net with little effort in searching. Also, I'm not encouraging anyone to spam these people, or do "bad things"... I just want J-boy and the Gregster to feel the love they've shown towards us. Boy they're hot... I think I'm getting a crush!

    Spread the love!

  132. Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suspected this sometime ago.

    After collecting various "hints" they gave
    (such as n letter from you mail address,
    i vowels, same domain as you) I was able to
    run these rules against a list of all the
    local users. None could pass more than half
    the rules.

  133. Am I the only /. user that used this successfully? by ealways · · Score: 1

    Exactly 8 months 12 days ago I got an email from Crushlink and thought I'd check it out. I spent some time to make a list of 4 girls I liked and voila! I matched with a girl that I liked but I never knew she liked me! So we started going to the day after and that's why I know the email was 8 months 12 days ago, because we've now been dating 8 months 11 days! I was so happy I even wrote into their "stories" email address but never received a reply. Are my girlfriend and I the *only* successful users of this site? Also, I haven't received any spam from Crushlink or other sites so I thought this was totally legitimate (after all, it was responsible for my new girlfriend), so I was kind of shocked to see the article and all the comments. Do we know for sure that they spam or are people just frustrated that they can't figure out who likes them? (like a couple of my friends :)

  134. Re:Am I the only /. user that used this successful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the rest of us like a girl, we generally ask her out. Fucking pussy.

  135. Just wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just wait until someone figures out that they can take these email addresses, change the random word at the beginning, and they're suddenly valid again.

    Give me just one of your addresses and I can spam you forever.

    finenessflurriedfeature

  136. you would think by hpavc · · Score: 1

    thats this would be against racespace's AUP ... but the trickets i opened with them didnt go anywhere. This 'service' is really nasty with the amount of email addresses is must produce.

    --
    members are seeing something, your seeing an ad