I think a bigger question is what kind of kids steal from their parents? If I wanted I could have ordered pay per view movies from the time I was 12 without my parents permission, or ordered shit on amazon with 1 click. This is quite simply a parenting and trust issue, rather than a tech issue.
and a 5 year old is fully aware that by clicking a button that says he wants more blue crystals or whatever the fuck that they are spending their parents money?
A Bachelor of Applied Science from the Queensland University of Technology a superior credential that a Bachelor of Science from Cornell. Are you smoking crack?
"Update 1.9.14: Rogers confirmed to WIRED that the vulnerability he found was a SQL-injection vulnerability. He says the police have not contacted him and that he only learned he’d been reported to the police from the journalist who wrote the story for The Age."
HE DID NOT GET ARRESTED. Clearly who ever posted this story can't read.
Oh you mean after once side they used a bunch parliamentary tricks to limit debate, ultimately abusing budget reconciliation to prevent amendments to the bill, that democratic process?
Face it the leftists did everything they possibly could within the rules to ram the thing thru because that was the only way it was getting through.
Is someone feeling a bit of butt hurt that a majority voted for something and it got up?
Is that what the religious hierarchy is afraid off? That some of their members might request the pill. Perhaps they'd rather nuns who get pregnant throw the offspring down wells like they've always done.
Some times people deserve capital punishment. I am not saying in most of the cases that we do it they deserve it, but someone who is an un-remorseful mass murderer should be put to death. The tax payer should not be liable to keep them alive, or let them free to kill again.
Whether some people deserve it or not is irrelevant, given that is not demonstrated as the criterion taken into account for people who are sentenced to death. The criterion taken into account, as demonstrated by statistics, is race and socioeconomic background.
Dead wrong for a country to take a moral stance that affects others overseas? Do you mean like the US government having as a condition of funding aid agencies in Africa, that they not educate about the use of condoms in Africa?
Yes, the American hospital system is insanely expensive. Although I don't think the source of the income for that system is the reason it is so expensive. Rather, US regulation is.
It's also worth noting many of those countries (eg: Canada) refuse to permit a patient access to non-government-approved medicine. No, I'm not saying the hospital won't let you have cocaine to ease the pain, I'm saying expensive cancer drugs are banned because they would increase healthcare costs to US levels:
Australia has a socialised health care system where everyone earning above $19,404 per annum pays into it. That system provides better outcomes for the whole of the population (not just the rich who can afford adequate cover) at under half the cost of the US per capita.
The sig is mainly aimed at leftists who frequently call libertarians conservative in spite of the fact that they want to end the drug war, promote equal protection under the law including marriage equality, end interventionary foreign policy, reform immigration, etc. etc.
There's really nothing conservative about libertarians at all, they hate almost everything about the status quo.
What is conservative about Libertarians is their economics. Giving more freedom to capital entrenches the status quo.
Im not sure why but its a big thing for them to bash on and hate the UN...
Just one point on which the Republican's are massive hypocrites. "The Republican's got into power and pulled out of the security council" will no one ever say.
Only if you define the set of symptoms to be a specific disorder. In which case you can create any number of diseases you like, as long as you define a set of corresponding symptoms to be a disorder first.
Slashdot Mirror
I can confirm that it does crash skype. Gotta say, I'm pretty impressed with the stupidity involved in allowing that bug to survive.
Machine sounds sucky!
I think a bigger question is what kind of kids steal from their parents?
If I wanted I could have ordered pay per view movies from the time I was 12 without my parents permission, or ordered shit on amazon with 1 click.
This is quite simply a parenting and trust issue, rather than a tech issue.
and a 5 year old is fully aware that by clicking a button that says he wants more blue crystals or whatever the fuck that they are spending their parents money?
I like your style and your sig, AlanS2002!!!
Yeah, I know I rock.
You have a 100% chance of dying over time.
A Bachelor of Applied Science from the Queensland University of Technology a superior credential that a Bachelor of Science from Cornell. Are you smoking crack?
You would of thought that who ever accepted it to be posted would of read TFA article and realised it was a crock.
http://www.theage.com.au/technology/technology-news/schoolboy-hacks-public-transport-victoria-website-20140107-30fkg.html
For anyone who is interested
"Update 1.9.14: Rogers confirmed to WIRED that the vulnerability he found was a SQL-injection vulnerability. He says the police have not contacted him and that he only learned he’d been reported to the police from the journalist who wrote the story for The Age."
HE DID NOT GET ARRESTED. Clearly who ever posted this story can't read.
Oh you mean after once side they used a bunch parliamentary tricks to limit debate, ultimately abusing budget reconciliation to prevent amendments to the bill, that democratic process?
Face it the leftists did everything they possibly could within the rules to ram the thing thru because that was the only way it was getting through.
Is someone feeling a bit of butt hurt that a majority voted for something and it got up?
Is that what the religious hierarchy is afraid off? That some of their members might request the pill. Perhaps they'd rather nuns who get pregnant throw the offspring down wells like they've always done.
Someone needs to tell these idiots that 1984 wasn't meant to be a manual.
You're certainly displaying quite a bit of butt hurt. Do you do that every time your side doesn't win at something?
"no bank or bitcoin-emitter can be as public-minded as a government"
Ask the public in a totalitarian state, how public-minded their governments are.
Some times people deserve capital punishment. I am not saying in most of the cases that we do it they deserve it, but someone who is an un-remorseful mass murderer should be put to death. The tax payer should not be liable to keep them alive, or let them free to kill again.
Whether some people deserve it or not is irrelevant, given that is not demonstrated as the criterion taken into account for people who are sentenced to death. The criterion taken into account, as demonstrated by statistics, is race and socioeconomic background.
That's dead wrong!!!!!!!!!!
fp ftw
Dead wrong for a country to take a moral stance that affects others overseas? Do you mean like the US government having as a condition of funding aid agencies in Africa, that they not educate about the use of condoms in Africa?
Yes, the American hospital system is insanely expensive. Although I don't think the source of the income for that system is the reason it is so expensive. Rather, US regulation is.
It's also worth noting many of those countries (eg: Canada) refuse to permit a patient access to non-government-approved medicine. No, I'm not saying the hospital won't let you have cocaine to ease the pain, I'm saying expensive cancer drugs are banned because they would increase healthcare costs to US levels:
http://www.fraserinstitute.org/research-news/news/display.aspx?id=18745
Australia has a socialised health care system where everyone earning above $19,404 per annum pays into it. That system provides better outcomes for the whole of the population (not just the rich who can afford adequate cover) at under half the cost of the US per capita.
Got two fake accounts, then my own plus access to another three accounts that belong to others. Not been busted.
The sig is mainly aimed at leftists who frequently call libertarians conservative in spite of the fact that they want to end the drug war, promote equal protection under the law including marriage equality, end interventionary foreign policy, reform immigration, etc. etc.
There's really nothing conservative about libertarians at all, they hate almost everything about the status quo.
What is conservative about Libertarians is their economics. Giving more freedom to capital entrenches the status quo.
More likely to see the otherwise ordinarily bullied up against the wall first in revolution.
http://2girls1cup.nl/
What were you doing, thinking you were going to get a free parking spot in the first place
Problem solved.
Im not sure why but its a big thing for them to bash on and hate the UN...
Just one point on which the Republican's are massive hypocrites.
"The Republican's got into power and pulled out of the security council" will no one ever say.
Only if you define the set of symptoms to be a specific disorder. In which case you can create any number of diseases you like, as long as you define a set of corresponding symptoms to be a disorder first.