It is the new gold in that people who have it is trying to hype it to get the value up. In fact it has always been like gold that way. Though it is slightly more useless than gold.
This bug is precisely why I just ordered a dual Xeon system instead of a Ryzen Threadripper. I can't risk it. The Xeons for the same price are slower clocked than the 1950X, but the build load is mostly thread and IO bound, so that's not as big a worry as a thread dying.
The newest Ryzen already don't have the issue, and if you see it, you can get a new one through AMD QA. Since it only triggers on Linux it is probably a small subset of costumers affected, though we would all have loved if they could explain exactly what happened.
Good. Every large group has it's version of Soccer Hooligans. The left is no different. The difference is (as Noam Chomsky noted) the Right is _much_ better at violence than the Left. Their love of strong authority figures means they can organize better and they've got more ex-military guys. The Left can win on issues because our policies work. But we can't win on violence because, well, we're not nearly as violent (and yes, that's probably a slightly controversial idea, but that doesn't make it less true).
Well. Germany does have a history with left-wing terrorists like Rote Arme Fraction, and is still dealing with occational 80s style BZers in Berlin that won't leave the buildings they are not paying rent for (though with large parts of Berlin formerly communists and some building occupied since the fall of DDR, the ownership is a lot more vague in places).
Arguing about the safety of fully autonomous vehicles is an exercise is futile theoretics. We know that if they work exactly as we imagine how they should work, it would be safer. But the question is *can* they be perfect? Or *will* they be perfect? Or even *when* will they be perfect?
Arguing about how safe 100% autonomous vehicles are is like debating if a Pegasus can fly faster than Griffin.
How about we stop reporting on how people feel about non-existent/unproven technology and just report the testable advancements in said technology until they're at the point to where the technology is ready for the market... and then report on adoption and experience?
Yep. I will not accept a a ride in self-driving car, for the same reasons I wouldn't accept a ride on a dragon to commute to work. Because neither of those exist.
I don't have the exact words Musk has used, but I distinctly remember that he said that all Teslas will come equipped with the HARDWARE necessary for fully autonomous self-driving (computer power, sensors), but that the actual functionality would depend on a future software upgrade.
That is the new line. Elon was much bolder in the past, and the whole thing have always been intended to give the impression of being fully automated even if it wasn't. You can see the confusion all over older threads discussing the Tesla.
"They are basically autonoumous right now. A half-a-mile long ship carrying a billion dollar worth of goods is typicall manned by three people, the captain, the engineer and the cook."
Where do you get this shit from? There's all kinds of people in the engine room, there's people running around checking for pirates, there's people checking the containers. there's people tightening the cables, people manning the refrigeration systems, the electrical systems...
You must be a programmer to have such a childishly naive view of the real world. Stick to keyboards with your slender fingers.
"They are basically autonoumous right now. A half-a-mile long ship carrying a billion dollar worth of goods is typicall manned by three people, the captain, the engineer and the cook."
Where do you get this shit from? There's all kinds of people in the engine room, there's people running around checking for pirates, there's people checking the containers. there's people tightening the cables, people manning the refrigeration systems, the electrical systems...
You must be a programmer to have such a childishly naive view of the real world. Stick to keyboards with your slender fingers.
They are basically autonoumous right now. A half-a-mile long ship carrying a billion dollar worth of goods is typicall manned by three people, the captain, the engineer and the cook. An autonomous sailing ship could get rid of those people.
An autonomous sailing ship could get rid of ONE those people
They are basically autonoumous right now. A half-a-mile long ship carrying a billion dollar worth of goods is typicall manned by three people, the captain, the engineer and the cook. An autonomous sailing ship could get rid of those people.
To perform this DOS attack, you must have a device physically connected to the CAN bus. If an attacker has that kind of access to your car, a DOS attack is not your biggest problem. The attacker could just as easily pump 120 volts into the bus and fry every component. Or leave a time bomb on the driver's seat.
Bomb under the car is a wellknown security issue with cars. It has been known for years. OMG!!! When will they solve it???
Maybe what you're missing is that it shouldn't be possible for an attacker to induce this state in the first place.
It isn't, because it requires local access. If you already have installed hardware in the car, you don't need other tricks, you could have done all of the same things by physical manipulation.
But it requires LOCAL access. They could remotely disable the brakes after first installing a remote controlled device into the car. For christ sake, they could do that anyway, if they have local access and can install things in the car, they could just disable the brakes....
Yeah, but the CAN bus isn't remote. It is the local backbone between the various computers in a car. I had always been under the impression it was not secure it was assumed any hardware on it was trusted.
If someone has access to the CAN bus, you are already pwned. It is not much of a flaw, except don't let hostile applications or hardware have direct access to the CAN bus. This is like saying PCs have a flaw, because something plugged in the PCIe bus can do bad things.
As it said in the article; people that put their homes up for rent on AirBnB.
They won't need this it if it was there home. And you can't have more than one home. If they are renting out multiple apartments they are landlords or hotel managers, and if they are doing it on airbnb, illegal ones at that.
[...]causing the devices to lose connectivity to the vendor's servers[...]
So, lemme get this straight: These things, that lock my home doors, have a connection to their vendor, reacting to this vendor's command to unlock or lock my home. Did I get that right?
What sane person would WANT that in the first place???
Apparently people running illegal hotel services, and need a hotel key system for their "non-hotel" on airbnb.
That is because nothing about voip requires regular pings. If that was needed on iOS that was defect of the lazy Apple developers and not app develpers.
Slashdot Mirror
The subtitles are by definition at the same focal distance as the screen, by nature of being ON THE SCREEN.
Though if you are talking 3D movies, then yes, subtitles do not work with 3D movies, it is a mess.
How long have you been saying that BTC value is a bubble?
Since the first time it burst, and every time since.
Bitcoins have no intrinsic value, it is not just overvalued, it is by design 100% overvalued. Much unlike real money that are based on debt.
It is the new gold in that people who have it is trying to hype it to get the value up. In fact it has always been like gold that way. Though it is slightly more useless than gold.
What is a semi truck? Half truck, half... what?
Half a van
This bug is precisely why I just ordered a dual Xeon system instead of a Ryzen Threadripper. I can't risk it.
The Xeons for the same price are slower clocked than the 1950X, but the build load is mostly thread and IO bound, so that's not as big a worry as a thread dying.
The newest Ryzen already don't have the issue, and if you see it, you can get a new one through AMD QA. Since it only triggers on Linux it is probably a small subset of costumers affected, though we would all have loved if they could explain exactly what happened.
Knowing almost all places have a few fake good reviews from friends and family, the place with more reviews is more likely to be genuine.
It is over 1000 deaths. Just only 153 were it was proven. The rest just happened to die after being tazed for some unknown reason.
Good. Every large group has it's version of Soccer Hooligans. The left is no different. The difference is (as Noam Chomsky noted) the Right is _much_ better at violence than the Left. Their love of strong authority figures means they can organize better and they've got more ex-military guys. The Left can win on issues because our policies work. But we can't win on violence because, well, we're not nearly as violent (and yes, that's probably a slightly controversial idea, but that doesn't make it less true).
Well. Germany does have a history with left-wing terrorists like Rote Arme Fraction, and is still dealing with occational 80s style BZers in Berlin that won't leave the buildings they are not paying rent for (though with large parts of Berlin formerly communists and some building occupied since the fall of DDR, the ownership is a lot more vague in places).
Arguing about the safety of fully autonomous vehicles is an exercise is futile theoretics. We know that if they work exactly as we imagine how they should work, it would be safer. But the question is *can* they be perfect? Or *will* they be perfect? Or even *when* will they be perfect?
Arguing about how safe 100% autonomous vehicles are is like debating if a Pegasus can fly faster than Griffin.
How about we stop reporting on how people feel about non-existent/unproven technology and just report the testable advancements in said technology until they're at the point to where the technology is ready for the market... and then report on adoption and experience?
Yep. I will not accept a a ride in self-driving car, for the same reasons I wouldn't accept a ride on a dragon to commute to work. Because neither of those exist.
I don't have the exact words Musk has used, but I distinctly remember that he said that all Teslas will come equipped with the HARDWARE necessary for fully autonomous self-driving (computer power, sensors), but that the actual functionality would depend on a future software upgrade.
That is the new line. Elon was much bolder in the past, and the whole thing have always been intended to give the impression of being fully automated even if it wasn't. You can see the confusion all over older threads discussing the Tesla.
"They are basically autonoumous right now. A half-a-mile long ship carrying a billion dollar worth of goods is typicall manned by three people, the captain, the engineer and the cook."
Where do you get this shit from? There's all kinds of people in the engine room, there's people running around checking for pirates, there's people checking the containers. there's people tightening the cables, people manning the refrigeration systems, the electrical systems...
You must be a programmer to have such a childishly naive view of the real world. Stick to keyboards with your slender fingers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
I get it from people serving on those ships. For shipping companies like Mærsk the rest are in the habors which they run.
But to be clear that is the minimum crew, and it contains a cook because usually there are more people.
"They are basically autonoumous right now. A half-a-mile long ship carrying a billion dollar worth of goods is typicall manned by three people, the captain, the engineer and the cook."
Where do you get this shit from? There's all kinds of people in the engine room, there's people running around checking for pirates, there's people checking the containers. there's people tightening the cables, people manning the refrigeration systems, the electrical systems...
You must be a programmer to have such a childishly naive view of the real world. Stick to keyboards with your slender fingers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
I get it from people serving on those ships. For shipping companies like Mærsk the rest are in the habors which they run.
It's a shame that people assume that people reference the US as if its laws apply everywhere.
In the UK you can be compelled to hand over your passcode too.
You can in the US too.
There's a book on my reading list that I haven't read yet (pay attention, trolls), about the history of shipping containers: "Ninety Percent of Everything: Inside Shipping, the Invisible Industry That Puts Clothes on Your Back, Gas in Your Car, and Food on Your Plate" by Rose George. The New York Times gave it a good review when it first came out, mentioning that the author traveled on a Maersk ship to research the book.
In related news, autonomous ships will soon become a reality. More targets for hackers.
http://spectrum.ieee.org/transportation/marine/forget-autonomous-cars-autonomous-ships-are-almost-here
They are basically autonoumous right now. A half-a-mile long ship carrying a billion dollar worth of goods is typicall manned by three people, the captain, the engineer and the cook. An autonomous sailing ship could get rid of those people.
An autonomous sailing ship could get rid of ONE those people
There's a book on my reading list that I haven't read yet (pay attention, trolls), about the history of shipping containers: "Ninety Percent of Everything: Inside Shipping, the Invisible Industry That Puts Clothes on Your Back, Gas in Your Car, and Food on Your Plate" by Rose George. The New York Times gave it a good review when it first came out, mentioning that the author traveled on a Maersk ship to research the book.
In related news, autonomous ships will soon become a reality. More targets for hackers.
http://spectrum.ieee.org/transportation/marine/forget-autonomous-cars-autonomous-ships-are-almost-here
They are basically autonoumous right now. A half-a-mile long ship carrying a billion dollar worth of goods is typicall manned by three people, the captain, the engineer and the cook. An autonomous sailing ship could get rid of those people.
To perform this DOS attack, you must have a device physically connected to the CAN bus. If an attacker has that kind of access to your car, a DOS attack is not your biggest problem. The attacker could just as easily pump 120 volts into the bus and fry every component. Or leave a time bomb on the driver's seat.
Bomb under the car is a wellknown security issue with cars. It has been known for years. OMG!!! When will they solve it???
Maybe what you're missing is that it shouldn't be possible for an attacker to induce this state in the first place.
It isn't, because it requires local access. If you already have installed hardware in the car, you don't need other tricks, you could have done all of the same things by physical manipulation.
But it requires LOCAL access. They could remotely disable the brakes after first installing a remote controlled device into the car. For christ sake, they could do that anyway, if they have local access and can install things in the car, they could just disable the brakes....
Yeah, but the CAN bus isn't remote. It is the local backbone between the various computers in a car. I had always been under the impression it was not secure it was assumed any hardware on it was trusted.
If someone has access to the CAN bus, you are already pwned. It is not much of a flaw, except don't let hostile applications or hardware have direct access to the CAN bus. This is like saying PCs have a flaw, because something plugged in the PCIe bus can do bad things.
As it said in the article; people that put their homes up for rent on AirBnB.
They won't need this it if it was there home. And you can't have more than one home. If they are renting out multiple apartments they are landlords or hotel managers, and if they are doing it on airbnb, illegal ones at that.
Can I hear that again?
[...]causing the devices to lose connectivity to the vendor's servers[...]
So, lemme get this straight: These things, that lock my home doors, have a connection to their vendor, reacting to this vendor's command to unlock or lock my home. Did I get that right?
What sane person would WANT that in the first place???
Apparently people running illegal hotel services, and need a hotel key system for their "non-hotel" on airbnb.
They ARE doing the right thing on Android. The only ones doing something wrong is Apple.
That is because nothing about voip requires regular pings. If that was needed on iOS that was defect of the lazy Apple developers and not app develpers.
They favor their own pockets and draconic tendencies and nothing else. You are nothing but cow for them to be regularly milked.