"They have to keep their connection secure". Hmm...And how are they (the normal Joe Six-pack) supposed to do that? How do they know to make it secure? Will somebody offer training courses? Will somebody issue a certificate: "You are allowed to connect to the internet"? I would love to see that happening but the chances are obviously slim. I would love the OEMs to be responsible for training their customer:
"You sir, if you wanna buy this shiny new computer, and want to connect it to the internet, must present a proof that you are capable of securing your connection".
But, obviously, this won't happen:(.
Seems like there's money to be made here. Probably google can shed some light on the situation, but where can one find what is needed to apply for a patent as a Canadian? I mean... wtf, RRSPs suck, getting a patent (on everything and anything) seems to be much easier.
While the application might be portable to Mono if you're writing in.NET, the problem with.NET is, (IMO), that is still a young technology. java is been there for quite some time now, is stable, there is more documentation for it, it is basically a proven technology. Health care is known for not embracing new and unproven technology. And this is understandable, you can't afford a system problem when there are people lifes at stake. If you want them to buy from you, give them something rock solid, something build on a proven technology. The servers might be Sun's or IBM's, the workstation might run Windows, you ccan create web based or desktop application, you basically have choices. Just to make them feel on a secure ground.
that's true, they might thrive. However, let's think about a point in time, when "they" will be the super-creatures, and us... the slaves. hmmm, it makes me shiver.
everything is bullshit. in 3 days we will hear about who knows how many $ pumped by m$ into those companies. the article lacks too many details (important ones) to be classified as a news. it is not. it is made by m$ for their own evil purposes. that's all.
it's the only advice that i can give you. set yourself some goal (I want to be able to do this or that), search on google and do it. every training that I saw (participated) taught me nothing that i couldn't found on google:).
all the things that i have there: email, web, etc. Since i only work for about 4 years now, I can't say i know how it would be without all this, but i think that nothing good would come out.
Well, being such an curious person, I wanted to see what is this BSD thing. And i got my hands on 5.2 REALEASE and gave it a shot. Well, i was surprised. It is very different from linux (not just another tool for the job, but the arhitectural thing is diferent). It seemed to me that it really runs faster, it's more responsive. While i compiled various applications from ports, the cpu was at 100%, but whenever i issued a command, it was executed instantly. I must say, that this does not happen in linux. Probablly i have used linux more, and I know its ups and downs, and in freebsd i have only seen the ups in such a short time, but man... I love it.
I really do.
Yeah, i've noticed that kind of beaviour in a scientist. "If I can't see it, it's not there" . Well, a lot o theories are based on this simple fact, and i think that it is wrong. It's basically, like the premise that the universe is expanding. I don't know if this is true. It is expanding for us. Every year the universe is bigger with a light year. But i think is normal. But it doesn't mean that it really expands. Only we *think* it does.
I think scientist could get over the facts that you see, and the facts that can be, only need to be proven to be out there.
When a linux company will have M$ money ...
on
Linux on the Desktop
·
· Score: 0
and when it will use M$ marketing tactics thats when we'll ever see linux on all desktops. But... I don't want that to happen. Linux forum are already bloated with stupid suckers, I can only imagine what is happening on windows forums. Oh no.... I like my linux just as it is now.
Well, SWT is cool, really cool, and fast. (java it's just a wrapper for the native objects (gtk, motif,windows,etc.)), but , although I've worked with eclipse from some time now (6 months almost) I think that Borland's Jbuilder IDE it's the best so far. It's slower than eclipse, but it offers much more features. And... i'm so used to it:)....
Yes, that's one bridge that coudn't hold on to the wind. But, let me ask u this: How many programs have u seen that would crash at even the smaller sign of an overload, of an turbulence in the system, or just crash, even if in the system the sun was shining?
I've seen lots of them, and u probably too. I would like to seem the same percentage of broken programs as in broken bridges. Most of the bridges are very stable, some broke, yes, but very few.
well, because Galeon version X works with mozilla version Y. Thats always been the case. If u look at the galeon page u see that it states: mozilla Y compatibility/requirement . If you install mozilla Y and not Galeon that works with that version of mozilla, it won't work. Thats why i wait for the next release of galeon, before grab my hand on the new mozilla. Galeon it's the best and i know it's worth waiting.
It makes me cry, when i think about my poor 56kb dial-up connection at home.
About my 2Mb connection at work (of witch i used to be very proud:))
Cmon' grow up, i'll get one connection like that some day.....
Can somebody pls explain SHORTLY, what is written here? In this article? After reading 2-3 pages, i gave up. It's interesting. but i can't take ti anymore.
Slashdot Mirror
"They have to keep their connection secure". Hmm...And how are they (the normal Joe Six-pack) supposed to do that? How do they know to make it secure? Will somebody offer training courses? Will somebody issue a certificate: "You are allowed to connect to the internet"? I would love to see that happening but the chances are obviously slim. I would love the OEMs to be responsible for training their customer: "You sir, if you wanna buy this shiny new computer, and want to connect it to the internet, must present a proof that you are capable of securing your connection". But, obviously, this won't happen :(.
Seems like there's money to be made here. Probably google can shed some light on the situation, but where can one find what is needed to apply for a patent as a Canadian? I mean... wtf, RRSPs suck, getting a patent (on everything and anything) seems to be much easier.
he surely can't, can he?
well?
While the application might be portable to Mono if you're writing in .NET, the problem with .NET is, (IMO), that is still a young technology. java is been there for quite some time now, is stable, there is more documentation for it, it is basically a proven technology. Health care is known for not embracing new and unproven technology. And this is understandable, you can't afford a system problem when there are people lifes at stake. If you want them to buy from you, give them something rock solid, something build on a proven technology.
The servers might be Sun's or IBM's, the workstation might run Windows, you ccan create web based or desktop application, you basically have choices. Just to make them feel on a secure ground.
that's true, they might thrive. However, let's think about a point in time, when "they" will be the super-creatures, and us ... the slaves.
hmmm, it makes me shiver.
everything is bullshit. in 3 days we will hear about who knows how many $ pumped by m$ into those companies.
the article lacks too many details (important ones) to be classified as a news.
it is not. it is made by m$ for their own evil purposes. that's all.
it's the only advice that i can give you. set yourself some goal (I want to be able to do this or that), search on google and do it. :) .
every training that I saw (participated) taught me nothing that i couldn't found on google
I suppose we won't get an mirror somewhere, are we?
all the things that i have there: email, web, etc.
Since i only work for about 4 years now, I can't say i know how it would be without all this, but i think that nothing good would come out.
Well, being such an curious person, I wanted to see what is this BSD thing. And i got my hands on 5.2 REALEASE and gave it a shot. Well, i was surprised. It is very different from linux (not just another tool for the job, but the arhitectural thing is diferent). It seemed to me that it really runs faster, it's more responsive. While i compiled various applications from ports, the cpu was at 100%, but whenever i issued a command, it was executed instantly. I must say, that this does not happen in linux. Probablly i have used linux more, and I know its ups and downs, and in freebsd i have only seen the ups in such a short time, but man ... I love it.
I really do.
Yeah, i've noticed that kind of beaviour in a scientist. "If I can't see it, it's not there" . Well, a lot o theories are based on this simple fact, and i think that it is wrong. It's basically, like the premise that the universe is expanding. I don't know if this is true. It is expanding for us. Every year the universe is bigger with a light year. But i think is normal. But it doesn't mean that it really expands. Only we *think* it does. I think scientist could get over the facts that you see, and the facts that can be, only need to be proven to be out there.
and when it will use M$ marketing tactics thats when we'll ever see linux on all desktops. But ... I don't want that to happen. Linux forum are already bloated with stupid suckers, I can only imagine what is happening on windows forums. Oh no .... I like my linux just as it is now.
Well, SWT is cool, really cool, and fast. (java it's just a wrapper for the native objects (gtk, motif,windows,etc.)), but , although I've worked with eclipse from some time now (6 months almost) I think that Borland's Jbuilder IDE it's the best so far. It's slower than eclipse, but it offers much more features. And ... i'm so used to it :) ....
Yes, that's one bridge that coudn't hold on to the wind. But, let me ask u this: How many programs have u seen that would crash at even the smaller sign of an overload, of an turbulence in the system, or just crash, even if in the system the sun was shining? I've seen lots of them, and u probably too. I would like to seem the same percentage of broken programs as in broken bridges. Most of the bridges are very stable, some broke, yes, but very few.
well, because Galeon version X works with mozilla version Y. Thats always been the case. If u look at the galeon page u see that it states: mozilla Y compatibility/requirement .
If you install mozilla Y and not Galeon that works with that version of mozilla, it won't work. Thats why i wait for the next release of galeon, before grab my hand on the new mozilla. Galeon it's the best and i know it's worth waiting.
It makes me cry, when i think about my poor 56kb dial-up connection at home. About my 2Mb connection at work (of witch i used to be very proud :))
Cmon' grow up, i'll get one connection like that some day.....
Can somebody pls explain SHORTLY, what is written here? In this article? After reading 2-3 pages, i gave up. It's interesting. but i can't take ti anymore.