Slashdot Mirror


16,000 CWRU Computers Getting Gigabit Ethernet

lowlypeon writes "In a move that makes going back to college more tempting than usual, Case Western is installing fiber connections in 16,000 computers over the next year to give students a 1 gigabit per second Ethernet connection. Administrators aren't sure what anybody needs that kind of bandwidth for yet, but they are curious to see how it gets used."

445 comments

  1. yummy .. by jest3r · · Score: 0, Troll

    pr0n, mp3s, avis, vobs, warez ... the usual

    1. Re:yummy .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget Quake 3, EverCrack, etc.

    2. Re:yummy .. by WEFUNK · · Score: 3, Insightful

      pr0n, mp3s, avis, vobs, warez ... the usual

      Obviously they will start out using the usual suspects, but if the bandwidth is sufficient, I suspect that these boring old illegimate uses will evolve into more interesting illegimate and legimate uses.

      Perhaps sharing entire music collections at once, or developing a good P2P TV sharing system. Maybe high resolution webcams and intra-dorm video conferencing. I think it will be interesting to see the communities and cultural shifts that emerge from this kind of concentrated bandwidth. Mini-cultural shifts from some of the above examples might include 'Dorm TV', with a floor or individual rescheduling (and retransmitting) distributely stored TV programs to fit in with classes, along with some ripped movies and home-made messages thrown into the mix. Also, in an age of reality shows, access to higher resolution web-cams/video conferencing might generate totally different perspectives on privacy, especially within an enviroment where students are already likely to share rooms, showers, and eating areas. Like those first exposed to e-mail and the web, these students will surely have different attitudes and higher expectations when they move out and begin work.

      Total speculation on my part, but high bandwidth should take us well beyond mp3's and warez, making this a very interesting experiment indeed. The big question will be how this use is monitored (traffic or anecdotal) and if the university/provider will step in prematurely to stop illegal or suspect use, since so much of the ultimately interesting (and even legimate uses) are likely to sprout from initial hacks for illegimate use.

      --
      My next sig will be ready soon, but friends can beat the rush!
    3. Re:yummy .. by Znork · · Score: 2

      Well, except 100Mbits networks can support such activity without any problem. You can even feed a decent video stream over 10Mbit. Or 2.5Mbit DSL. Video conferencing could have taken off at any point the last three decades. It hasnt happened. That you cant transmit 'full motion, full screen high definition' Just Aint The Problem. It just isnt interesting or practical for most people. It isnt interesting or practical in low res, nor is it interesting or practical in high definition. And for the JenniCam people of the world they already have it.

      Massivly paralell computing clusters would be one field where you could use it. Or for running all the computers as a single system image if someone felt like developing an OS that could handle it. Except I dont really think that many students would care.

      Backup servers is the only place where I've found any use for it, but then they have to take multiple 100Mbit streams at a time. And while not Gigabit, Fibre Channel is useful for consolidated storage. But then I dont think many students would like to pay $20 per gigabyte per month in storage costs.

      Personally, apart from infrastructure needs, I dont think there are many applications for Gigabit. The bandwidth is there for most things already. It's only when you start shifting the infrastructure from client/server/peer-to-peer to something completely different that there will be a use for it. And the bandwidth wont be the most serious problem in many cases anyway; latency is far worse.

    4. Re:yummy .. by two-bookoo! · · Score: 0
      While this is true, even high bit-rate video/web cast are still less then 5 Mbps or 5% of a standard 100base-T connection. 1000Base-T will not really (IMHO) make much of a difference- in things like VoIP and streaming video.

      If the network Switches and routers are connected to eachother with gigabit, and the users are connected with 155mbps ATM, The only current (non file sharing) benifant of 1000base-T is future demands and the possibilty of coders and hackers (not crackers) developing new utilitys, tools and p2p, video etc.

    5. Re:yummy .. by blazer1024 · · Score: 2

      You do realize that 1000Mbps is actually faster than most IDE hard drives? (I don't know what kind of drives they have..) The fastest ATA-100 drive I have gets about 35MB/sec at peak.. That's 65MB/sec you can't even really use for file transfers.

      Anything above 100baseT isn't really all that useful for induvidual workstations and servers, but it increases throughput for MANY workstations and servers, all sending traffic on the net at the same time.

      Also, remember that your PCI bus can only talk at a maximum 133MB/sec (and if you have many peripherals, some of that is already being used), so anything faster than 1 gigabit, and your computer can't even talk that fast.

    6. Re:yummy .. by timeOday · · Score: 1

      I always wished I could get video "reruns" of classes. Where I went they did videoconference classes for remote sites and they kept a tape, but there was only one tape made of each class, you had to go the library to get it, and half the time it was either checked out or permanently lost when you got there.

    7. Re:yummy .. by tbaggy · · Score: 1
      100mbps = 12.5 megaBytes / second (give some for overhead 20 bytes IP 20 bytes TCP and 8 bytes ethernet).

      A hardrive can do ~35 megabytes a second. That is equal to 280 megabits per second...well over the 100mbps limit.

      Remember, 8 bits to a byte, and network speeds are measured in bits per second and hard drive rates and files are measured in bytes per second (or just bytes).

    8. Re:yummy .. by caspper69 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but he said 1,000mbps, not 100. In light of that, it would stand to reason that his original post was correct.

    9. Re:yummy .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ethernet is serial, therefore it's 10 transmission bits per byte/octet, not 8. (One start, and one stop bit)

    10. Re:yummy .. by netsharc · · Score: 1

      Maybe high resolution webcams...

      Hmm, yes... hi-res coed-dorm webcam!

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    11. Re:yummy .. by Steve+Franklin · · Score: 1

      games games games games games games games games....just killing time while the bozo server decides I've waited 20 seconds before replying. No wonder Gnulix never took off.

      --
      Hic iacet Arthurus, rex quondam rexque futurus.
  2. P2P by Ween · · Score: 3, Funny

    and they thought they were having a problem with file sharing before .....

    --


    Tis better to be silent and thought a fool, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt --Abraham Lincoln
    1. Re:P2P by d23 · · Score: 1

      The 'problem' colleges were have with file sharing was that it clogging their networks. With an increase bandwith, that problem changes.
      The law of technology expanding to suck up all available resources still applies.
      And the 'problem' of the entertainment industry trying to control content with an iron fist will certainly worsen.

  3. Which one is it? by Beatbyte · · Score: 1

    Fiber or Ethernet?
    Token ring FDDI or 1000BaseT?

    Would be nice to have a dorm full of fiber.

    1. Re:Which one is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Every dorm room and office has one or two fiber drops.

      Man was that cool. I wish I still had it instead of DSL :)

    2. Re:Which one is it? by Knacklappen · · Score: 1

      Would be nice to have a dorm full of fiber.

      My mom always told me that I can't get enough of them (fibres)...

      --


      Excellence: Moderate (mostly affected by comments on your karma)
    3. Re:Which one is it? by stilwebm · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think that is journalists picking up the word Fiber and misusing it. It is a fiber optic network, just like most other large universities use. The fiber will only go to the GigE switches, which will provide several GigE drops per room. It would not be cost effective to provide 1Gbit fiber (Ethernet or otherwise) to every workstation when copper GigE NICs are so much cheaper.

    4. Re:Which one is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, all of the dorm rooms have fiber drops *to the room*. Direct fiber connections to the computers. Nearly all of the offices do as well, with the exception of a few, and the new building they just built on campus.

      We've had this fiber network in place for years (1993 I think). We ran ATM everywhere before, and are just now moving to GigE.

      (CWRU student)

    5. Re:Which one is it? by kochsr · · Score: 1

      they already have all the fiber in place. when case wired everything, they didn't use cat5. it was all fiber. i think they did it so early, that it was the only option.

    6. Re:Which one is it? by Tattva · · Score: 4, Informative
      The fiber will only go to the GigE switches, which will provide several GigE drops per room. It would not be cost effective to provide 1Gbit fiber (Ethernet or otherwise) to every workstation when copper

      As a Case grad I can inform you that there really is Fibre to every dorm room, class room, etc at Case. It was just running 10mb/s Ethernet when I graduated in '98. This included a fibre optic cable going right up into the computer on a fibre card. My first card in '93 was an AT&T ISA behemoth, going almost the entire length of my case, packed with chips. Now, this doesn't guarantee that they will follow the strategy for gigabit, but if they wasted all that money for fibre for 10mb/s Ethernet, I'd be surprised if they flinched now.

      --
      personal attacks hurt, especially when deserved
    7. Re:Which one is it? by AlgUSF · · Score: 1

      I would love to be the company who supplies the bookstore with GB Ethernet cards. $$$$$$$$

      --


      I want my rights back. I was actually using them when our government stole them after 9/11.
    8. Re:Which one is it? by paulbort · · Score: 2, Informative

      They actually ran FDDI (100Mbit over fiber) ten years ago, and put FDDI cards in everyone's PCs.

      My guess is that they're using the same fiber, just switching to a Gigabit protocol, since the migration to ATM a few years ago was kinda lame. (Yes, they were doing ATM to the desktop.)

      --
      -- Spring: Forces, coiled again!
    9. Re:Which one is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it was 155 Mbps ATM, not FDDI. There was FDDI used in the backbone at one point, but it all got migrated to 622Mbps ATM. I believe it is gigabit now.

      As the other poster noted, they ran fiber (both multimode and single mode, but they never terminated the single mode) when they wired the campus, and it seems to have been a wise decision, as the infrastructure has been future-proof (if somewhat more expensive hardware). New wiring will have both fiber and cat5(e?).

      In terms of networking provided over that 10-ish year old MM fiber, they've had 10base ethernet, ATM, and now 100 and 1000base ethernet.

      The network is routed now, but it used to be completely bridged (thousands of nodes)!

    10. Re:Which one is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      netgear got the bid.

      we all get netgear ga621 cards, but only if we had equipment provided by the school previously. incoming freshmeat have to provide their own 1Gbps fiber equipment. *ouch*

    11. Re:Which one is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, there is fiber to every room.

      For the majority of users, it does NOT run at 10Mbps, it runs at 100Mbps. The 10Mbps folks are either unfortunate enough to 1) Own a computer that can't take an ATM card, or 2) happened to get stuck with a 10Mbps Ethernet card during a short time when they were out of ATM cards (and never bothered to have it replaced).

      CWRU gambled years ago and chose ATM technology, beleiving that Gbps Ethernet on copper would never happen. They lost, and are now re-fitting the dorms with copper Gbps ethernet drops (and getting rid of all the ATM stuff I beleive). They are leaving the fiber routing infrastructure of course.

    12. Re:Which one is it? by undercanopy · · Score: 1

      Fiber or Ethernet? Token ring FDDI or 1000BaseT? Isn't Ethernet Link layer, not physical layer? WHy could it not be Ethernet on fiber? 1000bastT would be gig over copper, if anything. 1000baseFX perhaps? And tokenring is not ethernet. /nitpick

      --
      -- D-23994, Muff#2613
    13. Re:Which one is it? by Cramer · · Score: 1, Troll

      And so they continue on the road of lameness. There's very (*very*) little reason to run fiber to a desktop. There's not that much of a reason to run fiber to a server.

      In my book, the only reason to use fiber is distance. (And the fact that Cisco doesn't support copper GBICs on hardly anything.)

    14. Re:Which one is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what's actually going on is we are leaving everything in the dorm pysically as it is since the fibre connection is plenty fast enough. we're using the gigabit cards that have the right connection for our fiber facplates. they're just canging the backend over from atm to GigE since the atm was not easily scalable and was reaching it's limits for how much it could do while remaining stable.

      -CWRU ITS Employee

      FYI ITS is our brand new achronym for the IT dept: Information Technical Services. the main reason for that change was to be able to use "ITS @ CWRU" for our IT website.

    15. Re:Which one is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHAHAHAHAH... wow that blows, i figured case would provide it to everyone... thank god i dont have to buy one.. just hand in my handy dandy atm and ill be on my way

  4. how will they use it? by arson1 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    the same way everyone else does... music, porn, and games.

    --


    --
    Don't sweat the petty things, and don't pet the sweaty things.
    1. Re:how will they use it? by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 2

      Forgot movies. With 100mbps sharing music is painless, but movies will still a few minutes to move around. But go to 1000mbps an you can swap DixX like crazy, and streaming DVDs is vary possible.

    2. Re:how will they use it? by FrozenCat · · Score: 1

      It would be cool if they placed digital cameras in the lecture halls and webcast the lectures. I certainly new enough professors that could cure insomnia.

    3. Re:how will they use it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you meant "Forget music." But in any case, music will be shared non-lossy.

    4. Re:how will they use it? by pubjames · · Score: 2, Funny

      the same way everyone else does... music, porn, and games.

      Why do college students need a Gigabit Ethernet connection to download porn? When I was a student we had these great things called girls who let you have sex with them. Or is the fibre just being installed in the dorms of Computer Science students?

    5. Re:how will they use it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nope, yes said "Forgot movies", as in, "(you) Forgot movies", as in, "add movies to your list of things being shared".

      -ac

    6. Re:how will they use it? by sinnergy · · Score: 2

      No, fiber will be going to every desktop that can support it... all staff, all faculty and all students, regardless of major or degree. In fact, I bet some of the non comp-sci students here can think of better ways to use it than the comp-sci students themselves!

      (Disclaimer, I work in the EECS department at CWRU!)

    7. Re:how will they use it? by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 5, Informative

      Music won't be shared non-lossy. Sure, the transfers rates may be up, but this didn't have the beneficial side effect of increasing hard drive space. Very few people would be willing to d/l WAVs of CDs instead of MP3s for the extra bit of quality due to the 12x (average for 128bit MP3) file size increase. For now, at least.

      Same goes with movies. Right now, a high-quality DiVX run you .5+ gig, and while harddrive sizes are increasing, we have a ways to go before we do straight DVD rips.

      And again, we still have limitations of the system itself. Sure, you can run 1Gbps fiber into a 533 Celeron. The typical personal computer can't push 1Gbps through the system, and certainly not through the drives.

      Maybe someone will set up a beowulf/distributed.net hybrid, using the low-latency network to set up parallel computing on a dynamic basis (systems going on/offline). It would be interesting to see, and would be great proof-of-concept for autonomous computer projects, like IBM's SMASH (part of Blue Gene).

      Well, my .02$US at any rate

      --
      That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
    8. Re:how will they use it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey but that's just because your girlfriend is not a porn freak... wait a minute..

    9. Re:how will they use it? by SpatchMonkey · · Score: 1

      They could share WAVs and just burn them onto CD. No need for them to take up hard drive space.

    10. Re:how will they use it? by WalkingBear · · Score: 1

      Some very good points made here. However, systems capable of handling DVD rips or WAV rips of CD's aren't that unreasonable. I just installed a new file server here at work. P4 2.0GHz with the SMC GigE card and a Promise external raid box.

      Machine cost w/U160 scsi card, UPS and Monitor == $850
      910GB formatted RAID 5 w/hot spair (8 160GB drive array) == ~$3,600

      That's enough storage for 130 DVD's or ~1300 CD's.

      It's a bit pricey for your average college student, but not for 10 students to pool their resources and do.

      We've been running GigE with the SMC cards and D-Link Gig Switches for a couple of months. Performance has been stellar. (~600-700Mbit/sec sustained over the Cat5E installed in the office)

      Walking Bear

    11. Re:how will they use it? by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      You mislead people into thinking you used SCSI hard disks, but with the price quoted and the drive size, you used ATA.

      Be proud of your ATA RAID! Stand up to SCSI zealots!

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    12. Re:how will they use it? by McCart42 · · Score: 1

      I know lots of people that share lossless music formats - especially those that trade concerts. My suitemate last semester got a nice letter from the University for his efforts with Smashing Pumpkins bootlegs...the letter wasn't so much concerned with the legality of his trading as with the fact that he had used up one quarter of CWRU's outgoing bandwidth...

      --
      "I may be quite wrong." - Socrates
    13. Re:how will they use it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be proud of your ATA RAID! Stand up to SCSI zealots!

      Or go get one of these hybrid cards and have the best of both worlds. Cheap IDE disks run back to the card (one per channel, naturally), the card does all the gory RAID work, and looks like SCSI to the rest of the machine.

      Some of them even support hotswap. Life is good.

    14. Re:how will they use it? by Patik · · Score: 1

      Plenty of people share lossless music in Shorten (SHN) files. Read it about it here. Songs can be compressed to about 1/2 to 2/3 of the size of the WAV -- and for a perfect copy, it's well worth the not-too-significant download on a broadband connection. Smashing Pumpkins bootlegs are illegal (I think), but there are many bands that encourage this (Dave Matthews Band, Phish, Grateful Dead, and hundreds more) and I had no problems running a server at my school last year, sucking up about 4TB of bandwidth during the school year. If you keep it legal (not too hard), schools generally don't have much of a problem -- if they do, they should be capping people.

    15. Re:how will they use it? by howlingfrog · · Score: 2, Funny

      When I was a student we had these great things called girls who let you have sex with them.

      You're forgetting, this is CWRU. Men outnumber women 2:1. Supposedly, that situation has given rise to a saying among Case girls: "The odds are good, but the goods are odd."

      --
      The original Howling Frog is a fictional character and has no UID.
    16. Re:how will they use it? by sporktoast · · Score: 2

      You can theorize all you like about what kind of things will be enabled by this kind of jump in local access speeds. Forecasts about technology and culture are much more likely to predict non-starters like personal household robot servants or flying bubble-cars than they are to hit upon something like ultra-violent FPS games becoming popular or the creation of geocaching as a sport.

      But if there's one thing a look backward can tell us it is that the answer to "How will they use it?" is:
      In ways that you can barely begin to imagine, that will end up seeming glaringly obvious in hindsight.

      -Sporktoast

      --
      In a related story, the IRS has recently ruled that the cost of Windows upgrades can NOT be deducted as a gambling loss.
  5. easy by hummer357 · · Score: 1

    how to user 1Gb/sec??

    the joys of peer-to-peer of course!!

    h357

  6. pr0n by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now THATS a lot of pr0n! ;-)

  7. Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Now that's all we need are even more bandwidth given to people who will:

    a. run insecure unix machines that are often used in DDOS attacks.
    b. use them to attack other sites on the net at gig-e speeds
    c. run warez sites
    d. whatever else that is anti-social

    1. Re:Great... by Kevin+Stevens · · Score: 1

      well, I think you are confusing Bandwidth to the internet with intra-lan bandwidth. They have gigabit speeds to connect to each other with, but not to the outside world.

    2. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not neccessarily.. If they're not rate limiting their networks.. i.e. let's say they have (the college) has a ds3.. let's say that the dorm network's uplink to the main core network is also at gig-e.. let'say they're able to push data outbound alot harder.. hopefully their network group has a clue and uses access-list based rate limiting.. I didn't mean to give the impression that they'd be able to punch something out at gig-e speeds.. nor did I intend the original post to be a dissertation :)

    3. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What will happen is internal File shareing. some kid with 2 120 gig drives will move into one of the dorms... He is a warez Monger. He will become a god because of his Hard drives... the school will see this and he will get thrown out. thats whats gonna happen.

    4. Re:Great... by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      It's quite possible to be doing nasty things affecting lots of people without ever moving outside your LAN. There are about a dozen colleges on campus at the University I work for, and earlier this year we had an incident where a single student had trojaned himself onto lots of machines and used them all in a DDoS against a student at another college. Unfortunately the other college's network infrastructure was less than perfect and that childish little prank knocked the entire college offline for a weekend.

    5. Re:Great... by Wandering_Sole · · Score: 1

      "a. run insecure unix machines that are often used in DDOS attacks."

      yes, we all know how inadequate UNIX machines often feel.

    6. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, let's ban all system upgrades that could be used for anti-social purposes. In fact, let's ban everything that can be used for anti-social purposes.

    7. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What an idiot.. "Lets ban everything..." blah blah blah.. The last thing the net needs is a college run by clueless network admins and clueless system admins letting all the college kiddies run amok with high bandwidth.. and this stupid rating system calling the original poster's reply a troll is stupid too.. in fact, you're all stupid, most especially the people that run slashdot, a bunch of clueless wannabes working for a parasitic company who makes bucks from open source developers.

    8. Re:Great... by orthogonal · · Score: 1

      He is a warez Monger. He will become a god because of his Hard drives...

      [Old Man Voice] Ya know, when I was a kid, we had more stringent theological requirements for godhood....
      Omnipotence, omniscience, at least turning yourself into a swan to get laid.
      Ragnarok, Armegeddon, at least killing the Titans.
      Our gods destroyed whole cities of pervs, flooded the Earth, poked out their eyes in exchange for Wisdom, at least got themselves nailed to trees....
      I dunno about you kids...[/Old Man Voice]

  8. Moviez. by methangel · · Score: 0

    I think the connection will see a lot of local activity on the network versus actual activity on the outside Internet. Can we say movie sharing, game sharing and warez.

    I think the only real reason to have that kind of bandwidth is to satisfy a need for porn or warez. Seriously.

    "We need this bandwidth to transfer Linux distros and kernels."

    Hah, whatever.

  9. Educational Use by CaffeineAddict2001 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Being mature educated college students i'm sure this bandwidth will be used for nothing other than strict educational purposes.

    1. Re:Educational Use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm laughing like a little school girl...

    2. Re:Educational Use by BabyDave · · Score: 2, Funny

      I agree - I know that I learnt a heck of a lot of ... "biology" ... after I got broadband. :-)

    3. Re:Educational Use by Ooblek · · Score: 1
      Yeah, I think my friends used to label floppies with pr0n on them as "educational material" when we were kids. Not that their mom or dad ever looked into their collection or anything, or might have even been able to tell what the pictures where. (Ever see a digitized picture on a Commodore 64?)

      They will probably notice this bandwidth black-hole around the CS department the first day. Everyone will be running UT and Q3 servers on the department workstations.

    4. Re:Educational Use by squaretorus · · Score: 2

      While I agree that much of the bandwidth will be pissed down the drain, I have to say this is an excellent development.

      Sometimes teaching institutions have to invest in technology before the application arrives - the first computing departments did, and most of the 'firsts' were bought / built because the could - not because they were needed.

      Until you have a tool, you struggle to come up with apps. If I had the time, and the skills, and the access to this kind of kit I'd be playing with distributed EVERYTHING. Some decent, killer, must have or I die, app will come out of that eventually.

    5. Re:Educational Use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... don't forget Anatomy

    6. Re:Educational Use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and Nuclear Physics...

  10. finally... by arson1 · · Score: 2

    I can finally use the Gigabit ethernet card in my PowerMac!

    http://www.apple.com/powermac/

    --


    --
    Don't sweat the petty things, and don't pet the sweaty things.
  11. What about the constant reboots? by Smuffe · · Score: 1, Troll

    give students a 1 gigabit per second Ethernet connection...

    Oh boy, this is gonna be fun. Hopefully the medical students watching surgery in real time wont bother too much about the constant reboots because of kiddies running 31337 DDOS attacks at each other....
    /Smuffe

  12. Well, if it fails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there used to be a card-punch underneath Strosacker Auditorium - at least it was there 22 years ago...

    1. Re:Well, if it fails by MrHat · · Score: 1

      You must mean Sacstroker Audiotorium. :)

      And come to think of it, I never did get around to sneaking out into the quad at 2:00am with a ladder, and finally doing a swap('sac', 'stro').

  13. Minor correction by sinnergy · · Score: 5, Informative

    and a bit of a pet peeve.

    The name of the school is "Case Western Reserve". I know because I work, teach, and take classes here. Feel free to post your questions about it and I'll do my best to answer.

    1. Re:Minor correction by sllort · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Right, the Case Engineering school merged with the Western Reserve Women's University to form a single school, and the Western Reserve was a concession from Britain in the War of 1812...

      News Flash: nobody cares. As an alumni, I can assure you that in the real world, the name of our mutual alma mater is just too damn big. So chill.

      The point is that CWRU has been tossing students huge bandwidth for years now; it's a priority for them. They had 10Mbit fiber to the dorms in 1994, and then upped it to ATM to the dorms four years later, and now they're stepping up to 10 Gig. It's their ongoing social experiment of living on the bleeding edge.

      Important note: Their mail server still runs with unencrypted passwords, and their universal cardreader system works by sending your SSN in the clear over CWRUnet. So despite their love for bandwidth, their ability to utilize it lags behind, you know, CMU, and... the other smart schools.

      Just a hint.

    2. Re:Minor correction by sinnergy · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Well look who got up on the wrong side of the bed today.. tsk tsk.

      I'm sorry you're still bitter about whatever it was that made you angry. I don't know, but I'm sad just the same.

      You're absolutely right on both "Important Notes", at least for the time being. The mail system is in the process of being switched out for a system that will allow for all the encryption you could want and more. Also, I believe the card reader system is in the planning stages for being replaced as well.

      No need to be so bitter. CWRU isn't by far the best school in the world. I think anyone can admit that. However, being mean-spirited by saying, "their ability to utilize it lags behind, you know, CMU, and... the other smart schools," really isn't convincing and only helps to drive home the point that you're a bitter individual.

      Have a better day... from another CWRU alum.

    3. Re:Minor correction by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 2

      Important note: Their mail server still runs with unencrypted passwords, and their universal cardreader system works by sending your SSN in the clear over CWRUnet. So despite their love for bandwidth, their ability to utilize it lags behind, you know, CMU, and... the other smart schools.

      You can check your mail via kpop (although it isn't really advertised). I didn't know about the plaintext SSNs in the card readers, though... that's a little scary.

    4. Re:Minor correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More corrections, from a CWRU person who's been around here since 1988...

      The fiber optic connections to the dorms were completed by Spring of 1989.

      ATM was deployed to the dorms in 1996.

      The network the card readers use is when students buy stuff with their university ID card is entirely separate from the one students/staff/faculty have access to and it uses entirely different protocols.

    5. Re:Minor correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The point is that CWRU has been tossing students huge bandwidth for years now; it's a priority for them. They had 10Mbit fiber to the dorms in 1994...

      Actually, the fiber to the dorms was even older than that. I had a brief and egregious career as a college schtoodent at CWRU starting in 1989. That was the year the 10MBit fiber to every dorm room was installed.

      I didn't have a PC at the time, but some of my friends did, and it was pretty neat. Of course, what you got was a connection to the campus WAN (so you could send documents to communal printers that were perpetually out of paper) and the pre-web internet (which basically meant usenet, gopher, and IRC), so it wasn't as exciting as it could have been. Attempts to use the WAN for educational purposes in the pre-web days meant making document scans (as graphical files) available via FTP, which turned out to be one of the most cumbersome ways to waste huge amounts of bandwidth imagineable.

    6. Re:Minor correction by sllort · · Score: 1

      No need to be so bitter.
      I think, if you ask around Slashdot, you'll find that I am never bitter - in fact, I am never short of positive and upbeat, ever!

      That said, CWRU had an incident in 1996 where a large group of graduate Computer Science students would approach the tour groups of high school kids looking to attend the school. They would say "who here is a computer science student?" As kids raised their hands, the grad students would take them aside and inform them that the Computer Science program at Case was failing, that the best professors were resigning, and that if they had any sense, they would flee Case, like the grad students were. After that year, many undergrads followed the majority of the Comp Sci programs' professors in a mass exodus to wherever they could transfer to.

      Assume for a moment that I was one of the "refugees" who dumped a $24k/yr scholarship to go to state school because my college's Comp Sci program imploded due to mismanagement. Under that assumption, I might have an excuse to be bitter.

      But I'm not, so have a happy day.

      And as far as my "important notes" go, those were current eight years ago. The fact that they have remained unpatched for eight years speaks to... something. The fact that we built a server to intercept card reader requests and accept our cards in any door in 1995 and they still haven't fixed it... oh, but I digress.

      -s.

    7. Re:Minor correction by StrikerGold · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As another alum to CWRU, all I can say is I hope they do this upgrade right this time. I was taking classes there during the "upgrade" to ATM and while everything was far faster than the typical 28.8K connection of the day, there were alot of bandwidth problems due to their approach to implementing the ATM. Although I only used the ethernet connection, and not the ATM, (First PC was only a 486, the second was a PII 233, but at the time they didn't have reliable ATM drivers for the PII architecture) and the bandwidth for ethernet users was always much higher than your typical ATM user. Why? The infrastructure of the CWRUnet ethernet set-up was well established and optimized from the central core servers out to the routers for each building and dorm. The huge mistake of the ATM system was they tried to set it up all at once, instead of testing the stability of a core set-up before branching out to every other computer. The result was an absolute mess as far as lost email and dropped packets left and right. All of this seriously effected everyone from the astronomy dept generating 1 million point galaxy models to the untold hundreds of Quake and StarCraft games going on over campus. So, now that they have a new guy at ITS running the show, lets hope they do better this time.

    8. Re:Minor correction by sinnergy · · Score: 2

      Oh, I know. I was there. Sorry to hear that you were one of those folks.

    9. Re:Minor correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      >Right, the Case Engineering school merged with the Western Reserve Women's University to form a single school, and the Western Reserve was a concession from Britain in the War of 1812...

      Actually, not right. It was Case Institute of Technology that federated with Western Reserve University. Western Reserve University was coed and "Women's" was not part of the name.

      And the establishment of the Western Reserve had nothing to do with the War of 1812. The Western Reserve was a concession to Connecticut by the federal government in 1786, in exchange for other land claims by Connecticut.

    10. Re:Minor correction by aes12 · · Score: 1

      The women's college to which he was refering was Mather College, which joined up with Adelbert College to form Western Reserve University.

    11. Re:Minor correction by [Dilbert] · · Score: 3, Interesting

      FUD! FUD! FUD!

      As a student worker who has helped trace some of the fiber on campus and done work on several of the network maps, I believe I'm qualified to answer this to some extent. :)

      The Mail server - yes, it is still unencrypted, although that should end with IMAP this fall. (in theory). Besides - the gigabit is all switched. Much harder to see what's going down the wire unless you MAC spoof.

      As for the card access - i'm not sure about the past, but currently the card readers are on their OWN SET OF FIBER. The SSNs are sent as SERIAL data. The card readers are serial devices that come back to FOMs (fiber-optic modems) which run singlemode back to Crawford at the end of the quad. From crawford, all of the signals are muxed again onto one pair of singlemode that is then shot over to security across Adelbert, which houses the server that actually holds the access records for the buildings.

      As far as I know, card access has always been done like this. there has been talk of running it over IP, encapsulated & encrypted to hell. However, that is just talk, and it hasn't been done, yet or ever. Your SSN isn't readable. Anyone who says otherwise has either tapped the actual fiber that runs the cardreaders, or the layout has changed from the past.

      --
      From a motherboard manual, error beep codes: S-L-L-L-SS: Speaker Error
    12. Re:Minor correction by sllort · · Score: 1

      Anyone who says otherwise has either tapped the actual fiber that runs the cardreaders,

      Or an interconnected intelligent switch running insecure SNMP, correct.

    13. Re:Minor correction by McCart42 · · Score: 1

      The card system hasn't been upgraded for awhile, one reason is that the company that manufactured the card scanners is no longer creating new technology (read: going out of business), and from what I understand it was difficult to recruit a new company to serve CWRU's needs (read: completely replacing the ID cardswipe system with new technology, if I heard correctly). It's all hearsay though; I haven't heard anything official about it.

      --
      "I may be quite wrong." - Socrates
    14. Re:Minor correction by matuscak · · Score: 1

      So what did happen to the Computer Engineering department? I noticed awhile back that it seems to bave been absorbed into the EE world.

    15. Re:Minor correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Anyone who says otherwise has either tapped the actual fiber that runs the cardreaders, or the layout has changed from the past.

      HAHAHAHAHA! Do you really think tapping the fibers is a task beyond the reach of bored college students? Shit, all you have to do is find the plug and plug it into a laptop.

    16. Re:Minor correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a recent graduate of the Comp E dept, I can say that it is doing fine. It is still roughly 50/50 with hardware and software. It seemed like more software to me though. Good balance overall.

    17. Re:Minor correction by quintessent · · Score: 2

      Feel free to post your questions about it and I'll do my best to answer.

      Ok, here goes: Upon hearing "Case Western Reserve" for the first time, which of the following did you think it was?

      1) A hard drive manufacturer
      2) A Colorado brewery
      3) A wilderness area in Idaho
      4) A brand of fine tobacco in the UK
      5) A nuclear arms storage site in Nevada
      6) A California penitentiary
      7) A window case mod kit

    18. Re:Minor correction by fireklar · · Score: 0

      Mmmm...#5 Does anyone know how the EE program is there? I'm going in like 3 weeks :)

    19. Re:Minor correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, there was much more to Western Reserve than Adelbert and Mather. There was a third undergraduate college (Cleveland College), plus a slew of professional schools. Off the top of my head, Nursing, Dentistry, Medicine, Law, Library Science, and probably 3-4 more.

    20. Re:Minor correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Going in 3 weeks? Don't you think it's a little bit late to be asking how the EE program is, now? :)

    21. Re:Minor correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy enough for me to get a degree in it....

      Actually, if you look around and are interested in the right things (MEMS, AI, robotics, controls)there are good profs working on interesting projects. But the überdepartment is so bogged down with the baggage of profs from the old CS department that no real change ever actually happens. The end result is that the profs who actually want to do cool and interesting stuff have to end-run around the department (and the university, for that matter).

      Names to look for: Beer, Mehregany, Branicky, Merat, Phillips. Names to avoid: White, Papachristou.

      As for undergraduate education - it's seriously lacking in hands-on experience, but is good if you're planning on going for additional degrees. And the name still has some weight in some circles.

    22. Re:Minor correction by pricedl · · Score: 1
      Your SSN isn't readable. Anyone who says otherwise has either tapped the actual fiber that runs the cardreaders, or the layout has changed from the past.

      Or has their own card reader to swipe your card through. All it has is your SSN + an extra digit, which is incremented each time you lose your card.

      Why exactly does the card have to have your SSN, rather than some other unique (and unguessable) key? Here's a trick. Find yourself a magstripe writer, and the SSN of student (not hard, they're everywhere). Write SSN followed by 1 on a card, and see where you can go.

      Wait, what was the problem again? Someone might find out your SSN? If you ask me, the school should be more worried about unauthorized access, theft, etc.

    23. Re:Minor correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What laptop has fiber?

      Wireless fiber I'm sure

    24. Re:Minor correction by gcrocker · · Score: 1

      CWRU has had fiber to the dorms since '89. I was there, and it was groovy. http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/tour/Tours/CWRUnet_Tour s/CWRUnet_Timeline.html#pre88

      -glenn

  14. don't get all excited just yet by evacuate_the_bull · · Score: 1

    no one else in any non-commercial environment is going to have this kind of bandwidth to push content, so there should be a massive bottleneck, right? so where exactly is the good of this. you have a ton more bandwidth, but everyone else's bandwidth is the same so you still can't really get content any faster... where is broadband for the masses when you need it?!?

    --
    Satanists get good grades too...suspiciously good grades
    1. Re:don't get all excited just yet by bleckywelcky · · Score: 2


      Um this is good for the 16,000 people who have access to the 1 Gbps connections. Quite a large community that is plenty for moving data and live streams around. Heck, even some campuses block outside access now except for strict http traffic, yet p2p and games etc seem to run rampant there.

    2. Re:don't get all excited just yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm all excited. Just think of the awesome DDoS potential. Each one of those windoz computers would be the equivalent of 100 normal 10Mb zombie machines. My God, the firepower this system will create.... There will be turf wars over who can control the zombies.

    3. Re:don't get all excited just yet by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 2

      Only internally. Some unhappy CS student could set up a massive DDoS on the prof's computer, but not outside. The only thing they would acheive in attempting DDos on an outside location would be to flood their router(s) and, just maybe, make a minor impact on the target server.

      --
      That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
    4. Re:don't get all excited just yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we have the same problem with only base-100 ethernet at U of Dayton. The university spent millions on this network, then decided that bandwidth cost too much, and started blocking p2p, and all kinds of ports (even outgoing port 80! No hosting websites from oncampus, to off campus!)

      it's really been a battle about liabilty for file sharing, bandwidth useage, ect. i wish them luck.

      and they blocked my name for posting... boo moderation!

  15. University Cheaters by Mr+Guy · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's sad what admins will convince businesses and colleges to do just to get ahead in the SETI ratings.

    1. Re:University Cheaters by -atom.p · · Score: 1

      Seti doesn't really rely so much on bandwidth as it does processing time. 10 megabit was plenty for SETI.

    2. Re:University Cheaters by anandsr · · Score: 1

      Hurrah! I must get a faster internet connection,
      It makes my measly pentiumII into a supercomputer.

      Seriously, SETI is not that much of a bandwidth hog,
      its much more a CPU hog.

    3. Re:University Cheaters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because the average calculation time is so small that you need gigabit ethernet to get new data from SETI. You obviously couldn't tell your ass from a hole in the ground, even with high quality satellite imagery. Even if you had a Cray at home, you wouldn't need anywhere near gbit enet to feed it data from SETI and pass the results back.

      Now, if they convinced the administration they needed a huge cluster, that would be a different story.

    4. Re:University Cheaters by Dirtside · · Score: 2

      Forget SETI -- contribute to a project with a more guaranteed payoff, like Folding @Home, which is basically a distributed protein folding program. You'll be contributing to Alzheimer's research, and other medical breakthroughs... I personally think this is much more valuable than SETI (and much more likely to produce something useful).

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  16. Hello VoIP by webword · · Score: 2

    If some folks were smart, they would try to do two things:

    1. Set up VoIP systems. This might kill their telephone bills. Who knows? Find a way to make VoIP work, work, work.

    2. Set up wireless hubs everywhere in the area. See how people get creative with the access. Always on, always fast. Yum!

    1. Re:Hello VoIP by sinnergy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, those are two of the things I know that are in the planning stages. What isn't in this article is that about 10,000 WAPs will be deployed across campus to allow for as much seamless coverage as possible. The WAPs will be capable of holding 2 radios (ostensibly for 802.11b/g and 802.11a). One of the neat ideas being bantered about is perhaps the ability to do VoIP over 802.11... so... cellular service with a twist.

      Also, CATV might possible be streamed as well.

      There's a lot of new technologies that are going to be pushed and tried out on this network. Some if it will be great, some of it will fail miserably. In any case, it should be interesting and hopefully everyone else will be able to enjoy the fruits of our labors and heartaches once we figure out what works and what doesn't!

    2. Re:Hello VoIP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      use a linksys model:BEFN2Ps4 voice/data/router/switch which allows a regular phone to attach to the router, then just dial (area)xxx-xxxx# = 3.9 cents a min domestic US, good rates for abroad that vary too

  17. Fastest gun in the West! by lionchild · · Score: 2

    At least they'll have little lag issues with Quake, and one can really find out who the fastest gun in the west is. Or at least the Case Western! (I'm just not sure how Cleveland, OH is considered part of the west....)

    --
    Awk! Pieces of eight. Pieces of eight. Pieces of seven... ERROR: General Protection Fault. [Paroty Error.]
    1. Re:Fastest gun in the West! by Sorthum · · Score: 1

      Actually, lag should still be the same. Bandwidth != latency.

    2. Re:Fastest gun in the West! by Jupiter9 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Western Reserve" is a term that was left over from the old original 13 colonies. When the original colonies of the United States were formed, most of the western borders were left blank, since the settlers didn't know how far west the land went. In 1786, Ohio was actually part of State of Connecticut. Connecticut gave up its claims to Western lands of the United States, except for a portion of northeastern Ohio known as the Connecticut Western Reserve. Later, the land was sold to the Connecticut Land Company, which surveyed and settled the region, but the name Connecticut Western Reserve - or just Western Reserve - continued to be used to describe the northeastern section of Ohio.

      --

      --
      Does anyone remember /\/\/\?
    3. Re:Fastest gun in the West! by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      Actualy there lag will increase GigE cards contain buffers (they have to of the poor PC's IRQ system would destabalize the OS at 130k interups a sec) Interupt coalessing is used to just generate an interupt as the buffer is nearly full or a watchdog timer says the oldest data in there is to old. This is the big difference between gigE and say myranet for clusters gige is fast for streaming (And outgoing servers like streamign video) 100bt cards have better latency numbers as they are pretty dumb packet in packet out machines. I do wonder what MTU they will be using 4096 MTU and higher start seeing the numbers realy go up :)

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    4. Re:Fastest gun in the West! by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 1

      (I'm just not sure how Cleveland, OH is considered part of the west....)

      Well, it's mostly because we here in the Northeast don't want it.

    5. Re:Fastest gun in the West! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The feeling is mutual. :p

  18. Cutting edge, but worth it.... by silverhalide · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is intereresting but not that all unexepected --- Case has always been on the cutting edge of networking technology. I almost ended up going to school there just because they already have ATM Fiber conncetions in all the rooms already (155Mb/sec IIRC). Gigabit ethernet in itself is interesting because I Don't know of any hard drives that can actually move 100 megabytes a second conitinuously, but I'm sure it will catch up one day. I wouldn't be surprised if students started building RAID striping arrays just to get the bandwidth up.

    On another note, the article doesn't seem to mention the speed of the actual internet hookup. Anyone know what they have over there? If they haven't upgraded that, then the whole thing won't seem any faster than 10-base-T when using the net.

    1. Re:Cutting edge, but worth it.... by sinnergy · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, I think it's going to be a good idea, too. Previously people had a choice between a shared 10 Mbps network (yes, shared... sloooow) or a 155 Mbps ATM connection (ATM never became the standard we thought it was going to be back in 1994/1995... oh well).

      I know students who already have striped RAID arrays (have to hold those research reports on something, eh?) I think, too, that that kind of thing will become more prevalent. There are already some high profile centers on campus that could use the bandwidth... and those folks stuck on the basic 10 Mbps network are going to gladly move up to something faster and actually switched.

      As far as off-campus connectivity goes, we have the equivalent of an OC-3, but only handle about 36 Mbps in commodity internet and the rest for Internet 2 (minus about 55 Mbps or so.... the firewall only has 100 Mbps cards or something like that).

      In any case, we have plenty of bandwidth to the outside world, but I expect we acquire more as time progresses.

    2. Re:Cutting edge, but worth it.... by tylerdave · · Score: 1

      While the 155MB/s ATM was fast when it worked, there were lots of reliability issues. Hopefully they'll do a better job w/ this.

      If you have a CWRU login and are interested in network stats, go here:
      CWRUnet Stats
      I don't believe there's any publicly available network information, unfortunately.

    3. Re:Cutting edge, but worth it.... by linzeal · · Score: 1
      If you don't have a login try

      user:Admin
      passwd:password

      and create yourself one.

    4. Re:Cutting edge, but worth it.... by JFalcon25 · · Score: 1

      As an alumni of CWRU (95-00), I believed that at my last visit, there was talk of capping the amount of bandwidth to the Internet. While CWRU did have an OC-3 line (plus several T1's as backups), it was switched from max OC-3 speed to a fraction of it to save costs. If there were heavy usage, CWRU would amend the contract to allow additional bandiwdth.

      Didn't use ATM network card...had a 3-COM ethernet, but it was still pretty fast. And at least I avoided those reliability issues (which got mostly fixed later on after 2 years).

      DARTH-SCSI still alive? The porn server! :)

    5. Re:Cutting edge, but worth it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If CWRU only has an OC3 to the outside world for 16,000 undergrads + labs + administration, then it really will be pretty useless to upgrade the internal network to gigabit. Considering that even one of those gigabit connections is (technically) 6.5x the OC3. Heck, even ignoring the official/business use, the OC3 only provides 9.7 kbps per student. I can get better than that with dialup.

    6. Re:Cutting edge, but worth it.... by Manhigh · · Score: 1

      The internet connection (at least as of my graduation in May) was OC3. However, the university has to pay per bandwidth (provided via OARnet), so it was actually at something around 25-35Mb/s. Not sure exactly because there was a period when it was constantly getting upped due to P2P hogging the pipe.

      --
      "Open the pod by doors, Hal" > "I'm afraid I can't do that, Dave" sudo "Open the pod bay doors, Hal" > alright
    7. Re:Cutting edge, but worth it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it should be set at 36 megs right now. even though, after the upgrade i've seen transfer speeds double to triple from off campus =)

  19. bottlenecks?? by MarvinMouse · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Won't this really only be useful for the people on campus, even if someone in New York had an equivalent HS connection because of the inherent bottlenecks that exists on the current internet.

    --
    ~ kjrose
    1. Re:bottlenecks?? by sinnergy · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, yes and no. The current off campus connection is equivalent to about an OC-3, with portions for both commodity Internet and Internet 2. I believe the idea is that we'll be increasing those caps and installing additional fiber to connect to the rest of the world. Granted, there will be a bottleneck SOMEWHERE.

      The Internet2 is actually going to make a big difference here... cheap costs to hook up host institutions and no need to deal with the hassles of the current crappy commodity Internet. Other Universities will probably follow step, I2 will be upgraded and then it will make a bit more sense.

      In any case, the whole upgrade will take about 18 months and we've just gotten started. Students are already set up to go, and the comp-sci buildings are going to be next (I know, because I'm responsible for making sure the upgrades go as smoothly as possible for my users).

      Still, I think there's a lot of experimentation to do with the GigE network even if we can only realize those speeds off campus. Will this make us a huge target for DDoS attack machines? Sure, but that's why we try to be proactive in protecting our machines. ;)

  20. well duh! by unFKNreal · · Score: 1

    Administrators aren't sure what anybody needs that kind of bandwidth for yet, but they are curious to see how it gets used.

    Isn't is obvious? Pirated movies, pirated games, porn, pirated music, more porn...

    Oh, did I mention porn?

    1. Re:well duh! by aznxk3vi17 · · Score: 1

      *GURGLE*......One million times........

    2. Re:well duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to mention huge gay naked videoconferencing orgies at full resolutions and uncompressed audio. I suppose the hetero version of this will be possible, but unlikely...

    3. Re:well duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're right, this is CWRU we are talking about. not many things hetero go on there.

      -ac

  21. I can hear them on the phone now... by __aahlyu4518 · · Score: 2, Funny

    yes mom... I'm taking care of myself... I get enough fiber...

    :-)

  22. What do I need this for ? by stud9920 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Broadband is useless : it's only useful for applications that are illegal or at least against Terms of Service.

    Want to download music ? Illegal.
    Want to download flicks ? Illegal.
    Want to run a server > Against ToS.
    Want to download commercial software ? Illegal.

    The only thing I can think of that's legal, is downloads of free software. About a few ISO's per year, for a very small percentage of the users (the geeks). No need for gigabit ethernet networks for that.

    1. Re:What do I need this for ? by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 2

      Running a server isn't illegal with my cable co (NTL in the UK)

      --
      And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
    2. Re:What do I need this for ? by Coke+in+a+Can · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing you're not a big fan of **multiplayer gaming**? You pretty much need broadband to play.

    3. Re:What do I need this for ? by yocta · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's plenty of legal free music and videos out here just look at mp3.com and any film trailers...

      I find Broadband is great for the speed of loading webpages and also sharing it with another computer at home at the same time. Dial-up was appalling hen shared between two, especially as I like to load several pages, collect mail and chat on irc all at the same time!

    4. Re:What do I need this for ? by macrom · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Want to use a VPN so you can work from home easily? Legal.
      Want to watch streaming concerts and keynotes of big events? Maybe view videos of your classes? Legal.
      Want to have a decent ping on game servers? Legal.
      Want to download the latest 200MB game demo in a matter of minutes? Legal.
      Want to try videoconferencing with your loved ones to save phone bills? Legal.

      If you can't think of legal uses for broadband, then maybe you're one of those people that's content to stick with a dial-up modem.

    5. Re:What do I need this for ? by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 2

      This would make quite the interesting playground for Massively Mutli-Player First Person Shooters (MMPFPS?) - of course your computer would need serious processing power...

      Wouldn't you want to play Unreal Ultimate: up to 1000 players in maps up to 5 square miles (scale)?!

      Of course, making the maps would be a huge undertaking...

      --
      That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
    6. Re:What do I need this for ? by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 2

      Perhaps there will be a huge video-conferenced/digitally-recorded class initiative!

      Stream or download your lectures in full MPEG2 broadcast quality with stereo sound. Also available on DVD for a modest production fee.

      --
      That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
    7. Re:What do I need this for ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *hmm*

      I'm pretty sure it's against your T.O.S. though...

    8. Re:What do I need this for ? by McCart42 · · Score: 1

      Funny, but you're closer to the truth than you might realize. Not for actual lectures though. CWRU uses the "blackboard" system to hold after-hour chats that are like recitations; one of my classes last fall had one. It was very helpful, and though I can't say videoconfrencing would have helped it a great deal, I suppose seeing my professor talk in response to our typed questions might have been useful. He certainly could have responded faster had this been the case. I'm sure you'll see lots more uses come this fall.

      --
      "I may be quite wrong." - Socrates
    9. Re:What do I need this for ? by stud9920 · · Score: 1
      If you can't think of legal uses for broadband, then maybe you're one of those people that's content to stick with a dial-up modem.
      No, I'm one of the illegal users.
  23. Already Done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well currently I am going to school at George Washington University (go GW!) and well....we've had this for a while. All of the major dorm rooms have Fiber connection running for EACH person in the room, all of the classrooms are wired into the fiber optic network, as are all of the Admin. offices. Then for each computer there is a 3-Com converter box that converts from the fiber plug to CAT-5. Actually if I remember correctly, the government had GW develop the technology and they were one of the first to run it. But let me tell you, it is a pretty sweet connection, makes me loath going home to a cable modem...

  24. How it gets used by andy@petdance.com · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Administrators aren't sure what anybody needs that kind of bandwidth for yet, but they are curious to see how it gets used.

    Porn.

    Duh.

    1. Re:How it gets used by xTK-421x · · Score: 3, Funny

      This reminds of one of my favorite Simpsons lines:

      Nerd: "I've invented a program to download porn up to a million times faster from the internet."
      Marge: "Does anyone really need that much porno?"
      Homer: "Uuuuuhhhuh... one million times..."

      --
      "TK-421, why aren't you at your post?"
  25. Nothing Legal by colmore · · Score: 1

    At this point in time, the only files that 99 out of 100 college students use that take up enough space to justify this kind of throughput are illegal.

    I know that they're installing this to be ready for future needs when they happen, but all they're doing for the near future is insuring that the kids won't have to pay for Warcraft 3.

    --
    In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    1. Re:Nothing Legal by dorky · · Score: 1

      What? Networked CAVE Quake isn't legal???

    2. Re:Nothing Legal by colmore · · Score: 2

      Quake on megabit ethernet and gigabit ethernet are indistinguishable.

      You'll notice when you send a DivX movie over AIM file transfer, though.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    3. Re:Nothing Legal by Cirvam · · Score: 1

      You didn't follow the link did you, VR Quake would use up a good bit more bandwith then regular quake and I would assume that Gbit ethernet would be better for this seeing how that's what most VR type things are used.

    4. Re:Nothing Legal by colmore · · Score: 2

      OK, followed the link...

      but still, this is a campus network for college students. I'm not saying that absolutely every single use of gigabit ethernet that actually utilized that kind of bandwidth will be illegal, i'm just saying that >95% of them will be.

      some day this kind of bandwidth will have widespread application in the general population, but right now, it's mainly useful for experimental, technical, and illegal data transfer.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
  26. [ sarcasm ] Great Investment [ /sarcasm ] by zubernerd · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Great, instead of sleeping to a boring professor, I can surf the web and get streaming [ place your vice here ]. How about investing in something else more benefical to students.
    More student activities/research/etc that will get them out of their dorm rooms, and out of the near antisocial virtual space, and doing something.
    Technology is great, but it is not a savoir.

    --
    Accentuate the positive, don't waste your mod points on the negative.
  27. what happened to actually "learning" by prisoner · · Score: 2

    at college. I'm sure that it's very important for Case to have a "leg up" on the bigger universities but is this going to produce better educated students? The teacher can control lights, sound system and link to the web....oh boy. I'm not dismissing the importance of research at universities but damn, isn't 100 mb networking enough for most dorm computers? Wouldn't the money they're spending on this be better spent elsewhere because $400/student isn't going to cover their costs!? The only possible use I can see for this is porn, warez, etc, etc, etc. Although maybe someone could scan one of those $200, 50 page paperback textbooks and make it available....

    1. Re:what happened to actually "learning" by tomzyk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      On Case's campus for the past several years they have had a system set up for freshman Chemistry review sessions (I'm sure it is used for other classes as well). The prof can broadcast the review live to the entire campus and students can call in and ask questions. From experience, I have found this useful in that (1) it saves me the trouble of hiking across campus to Schmitt lecture hall, but more importantly (2) if I have other obligations at the same time the review is going on, I can just record the review and watch it when I find time.

      Having the new technology so the "teacher can control lights, sound system and link to the web" will allow more professors to do the same. (Only one TV channel is currently used, so if it is broadcast over the internet, the number of classes you can broadcast simultaneously now increases... well, technically not infinitely, but you get the picture.) Being connected will also allow students to possibly send the prof diagrams, code-snippets, etc... which may improve the quality of the sessions as well.

      ("We... have ways... of finding out... who.. who... who you are....")

      --
      Karma: NaN
    2. Re:what happened to actually "learning" by sinnergy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I believe one of the design goals here is to also prevent the need to upgrade the network every 4 years. With 100 Mbps... chances are we will have to upgrade again. The more upgrades, the more chances for problems and the more disruption for users. Doing it less often will help to extend the investment. These issues have been argued ad nauseum on campus. There are certainly some downsides that few can argue against. However, I believe the benefits will far outweigh the potential downside issues.

    3. Re:what happened to actually "learning" by [Dilbert] · · Score: 1

      "Do you realize..."

      "And you... piece of crap, who just called..."

      That gave me a good laugh, thanks. :)

      --
      From a motherboard manual, error beep codes: S-L-L-L-SS: Speaker Error
    4. Re:what happened to actually "learning" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, CWRU's money could be much better spent. I am a current CWRU student, and as much as I am looking forward to this new connection, I wish they would put the money towards hiring better professors instead. I can't tell you how many times my friends and I have had professors that are horrible teachers. I assume they are good researchers, but they know nothing about teaching. I agree that research is an important part of the university. However, when it comes to the undergraduates, teaching ability should be the #1 priority. How else do they expect to produce good researchers for the future?

    5. Re:what happened to actually "learning" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...we have ways of finding out who posts here..

      you're out of school, pal.

  28. Why Gigabit over Fiber ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Why run fiber instead of 1000Base-T ? Sure for points outside the 100M limitation you will have to go Fiber, but the rest will make a lot more sense going 1000Base-T.

    1. Re:Why Gigabit over Fiber ? by polarkittycat · · Score: 1

      Because eventually we will hit the limit on what you can push through cat 5E or "cat 7" cables. Fiber's limit is way higher, so it stops them from having to rewire next time they upgrade.

    2. Re:Why Gigabit over Fiber ? by tylerdave · · Score: 1

      The fiber is already in place in the dorms (for the 155MB/s ATM network)

    3. Re:Why Gigabit over Fiber ? by sinnergy · · Score: 2

      As stated previously, we already have fiber run to every desktop. Besides, we all know the length limitations for GigE over copper aren't that good.

      In short, we already have the necessary fiber infrastructure there, so why not use that?

      It should be noted, though, that new faceplate installations (notably, for our business school) also have copper run to them as well as fiber optics (both single and multimode)

  29. now remember kids... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DONT SHARE your media or any copywright protected files... now go to your room, heres gigabit ethernet.

  30. So... by tbaggy · · Score: 1
    What are they running now before this upgrade? 100mbps? 10mbps?

    27 million is a lotta moola to pay for "lets just see what they actually use it for."

    1. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      155Mbps ATM

    2. Re:So... by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 1

      My friend at CWRU said it was 155 Mbit ATM fiber connections.

      --
      "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
    3. Re:So... by glacial23 · · Score: 1

      Some combination of:
      10 mbps shared (on ancient cabletron hubs)
      10 mbps switched(in a tiny number of places)
      100 mbps switched(some very recent areas)
      155 mbps ATM(most everywhere)

    4. Re:So... by JFalcon25 · · Score: 1

      Gotta love those cabletron cards. Had that when I was a freshman. Then to 3-com. Didn't get ATM since my dorm room was not set up for it. Then when it did, the tech refused to let me have one since I was running Win98 Beta but then I moved to a fraternity house which was ethernet only.

  31. Hacker Heaven by kireK · · Score: 1

    Imagine 10,000 Hackers ( ahm, college students) hacking away at the internet via gigabit! And some folks complain about the ./ effect now!

    1. Re:Hacker Heaven by idontneedanickname · · Score: 2, Funny

      ./ ?? quick, there's a rival site! we better get the news out that we were here first!

    2. Re:Hacker Heaven by kireK · · Score: 1

      I'd mod ya myself for catching the mistype. :-) But I can't.

  32. New Applications by shalunov · · Score: 2
    Come up with a new network application after music sharing and become famous!

    Non-starters:

    • VoIP (savings is tiny when backbone bandwidth is counted; with different calling plans and simpler billing traditional telephony might be preferred for its guarantees);
    • Interactive video (nobody wants it, good cameras are expensive, there's no good lighting in normal offices, and you cannot currently make eye contact);
    • Games (they barely ever use any bandwidth because they are always designed for diverse connectivity).

    I guess for a while we'll just see Fasttrack and Gnutella used to distribute movies... How utterly boring.

  33. going back to college by yatest5 · · Score: 5, Funny

    makes going back to college more tempting than usual

    Sorry, but personally, fast internet connections don't rate quite as highly as 18 year old girls...

    --
    • Mod parent up! [a] by Anonymous Coward (Score:5) Thurs, June 31, @13:37
    1. Re:going back to college by forkboy · · Score: 4, Funny

      A fast internet connection has more long term value. Your typical 18 year old girl is good for about 1 night....then either she gets bored and moves on or you want to strangle her after hearing "Like, you know, and stuff" in EVERY goddam sentence.

      Now Gigabit Ethernet....that's the gift that keeps on giving.

      --
      This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
    2. Re:going back to college by allanj · · Score: 2

      <envy>You went to a college with real *girls*?</envy> So that is possible, after all...

      --
      Black holes are where God divided by zero
    3. Re:going back to college by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BLASPHEMY! You're not a real geek!

    4. Re:going back to college by yatest5 · · Score: 1

      or you want to strangle her after hearing "Like, you know, and stuff" in EVERY goddam sentence.

      Just stick something in her mouth - job done...

      --
      • Mod parent up! [a] by Anonymous Coward (Score:5) Thurs, June 31, @13:37
    5. Re:going back to college by rcs1000 · · Score: 2

      But think how many 18 year old girls you can get to 'see' with fast Internet connection.

      And they are all at college too - at least they are according to the emails in my in-tray.

      --
      --- My dad's political betting
    6. Re:going back to college by Reckless+Visionary · · Score: 2

      You have only an "in-tray", not an "in-box"? I'm jealous. Most of the time I feel like I have an in-warehouse.

      --
      I think I'll stop here.
    7. Re:going back to college by erink42 · · Score: 1

      Maybe for you, but have you ever met a guy from Carnegie Mellon? Probably not, since they never leave their rooms where their precious bandwidth is....

    8. Re:going back to college by feronti · · Score: 1

      Especially fast 18 year old girls....

  34. Famous last words by Darth+Gambit · · Score: 1

    "Administrators aren't sure what anybody needs that kind of bandwidth for yet, but they are curious to see how it gets used."

    Those guys are so fired when the system crashes =)

  35. Can we say �LAN PARTY�? by Geldon · · Score: 1

    now if only my computer's internal bus speed was that fast...

  36. Not sure how its going to be used ? Seriously now by CDWert · · Score: 2

    Ok lets take this recipe

    College students.
    Computers.
    Gigabit eth0 interface.
    Porn.
    Warez.
    Muzic.

    And these "ADMINISTRATORS" dont yet know how the bandwith is going to be utilized ?!?!?!

    I think someone is asleep at the wheel. Or just dosent have a clue what college students are all about. I mean sure, some will be running spatial simulations of the end of time on their gigabit beowulf cluster that geek squad 101 puts togeter on this network and all that acedemia but, but how about the most kick ass perr to peer network know to man ?

    I wonder if they'll pu that in the brocures :)

    I am curios what type of traffic shaping and filtereing they are going to do on the campuses in and outbound pipe to the net ?

    --
    Sig went tro...aahemmm.....fishing........
  37. Re:finally...NOT by hbackert · · Score: 1

    No you don't:

    In all, 16,000 computers, including machines in every dorm room, will be linked over the coming year to a fiber-optic network that delivers data at up to one gigabit per second.

  38. Meet the sales guy by kruczkowski · · Score: 2

    I want to meet the sales guy that sold them the switches.

    How much does GigE run per port? $500?

    --
    hmm... for fun I enjoy launching DDoS attacks against 127.87.42.5
    1. Re:Meet the sales guy by Futaba-chan · · Score: 1

      It's possible that they got beta hardware from some manufacturer in exchange for testing and a good customer story/endorsement, either free or at a steep discount. That's exactly what happened with the previous generation of CWRUnet hardware....

    2. Re:Meet the sales guy by [Dilbert] · · Score: 1

      uh, you claim to be a cisco guru... you should have an idea.

      the switches are all 6509s and 6513s. Many many blades of gig fiber. :) The sprint guys who installed them were really nice too, i talked to a couple.

      --
      From a motherboard manual, error beep codes: S-L-L-L-SS: Speaker Error
  39. And occasionally referred to as... by dpilot · · Score: 2

    Case Western Reverse University,

    at least when I went there. aka See double, you are you.

    Are the Spitwad and the Fountain still in the quad? Is Presti's Donuts still in business, and are the Best Cinnamon Rolls in the known universe still available there at 1:15 AM?

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    1. Re:And occasionally referred to as... by sinnergy · · Score: 2

      Well, it's called CWRU, too, yes. but the shortened form "Case Western" is still reviled today.

      The spitwad is there, as is the phallic fountain. Presti's still does brisk business, albeit in classier quarters. Eating a donut at 2 AM with the cop that just broke up your party there is still common.

    2. Re:And occasionally referred to as... by Futaba-chan · · Score: 1
      And also occasionally referred to as "sCWRU U.".

      Yes, the Phallic Phountain is still there, and Prestis is still going, still yummy, and still just as fattening. As is Tommy's. (I lived in Lakewood until last summer, and still get back to town for Rockers games once in a while.)

    3. Re:And occasionally referred to as... by d-rock · · Score: 2

      Presti's kicks a$$. Except on Memorial day, when they're closed. That and Mama Santa's kept me alive on a student budget. How are other things up in CNS?

      Derek

      --
      Don't Panic...
    4. Re:And occasionally referred to as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CNS no longer exists, sort of. The new VP of IS (Lev Gonick) has come in and ripped up departments and is making all kinds of big structure changes. The department formerly known as CNS is now being called INS, or so I'm told. /me is just a student worker so isn't totally in the loop. :p Actually, I'm posting @ work. ;)

      Who did you know at CNS? Most of the same people that have been here for the past 4-6 years are still here, just that the department's name has changed.

      Oh, and i don't know what the huge stink about this is. It was announced back in FEBRUARY, and the internet pipe is NOT getting bigger. 36mbit commodity and 155-36 = 119 mbit of I2. Gigabit doesn't help the warez trade here. :p

    5. Re:And occasionally referred to as... by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Case Western Reverse University

      Reverse? Does everyone have to walk backwards?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    6. Re:And occasionally referred to as... by justruss · · Score: 1

      Late night Presti's is the same, but the day-time version (down the road) is upscale now.

      If you look on the floor of the Adelbert Gym, you'll see the approved shortened name is "Case Reserve", abbreviated there CR.

      russ

    7. Re:And occasionally referred to as... by Neil+Rubin · · Score: 1
      CNS no longer exists, sort of. The new VP of IS (Lev Gonick) has come in and ripped up departments and is making all kinds of big structure changes. The department formerly known as CNS is now being called INS, or so I'm told. /me is just a student worker so isn't totally in the loop. :p Actually, I'm posting @ work. ;)
      That's funny. During my time there (1994-1998), they changed the name from INS to CNS. I think the change happened in 1995 or 1996. No new names under the sun, I guess.
    8. Re:And occasionally referred to as... by JFalcon25 · · Score: 1

      I can confirm that too. My time was 1995-2000, and when I first got there, it was INS. Kinda strange when their homepage said CWRUnet Network Services, and the CNS name officially sticked later on. Back to INS...nice cycle.

    9. Re:And occasionally referred to as... by ThomasMis · · Score: 2

      At 3AM you can still go to Presti's and get donuts... (although I didn't go to Case, I went to John Carroll down Cedar)

      --
      Check out my podcast: DreamStation.cc Video Game Show
    10. Re:And occasionally referred to as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about Mama Santa's? :o)

      We even had fiber back in the good old days. I remember as they had fiished installing it on my way out. It must have been 10/100BaseT though - not quite the lovely 1000BaseT. (I used to live in Alumni and Staley in the South Quad).

      Former CWRU EBME :o)

    11. Re:And occasionally referred to as... by gcrocker · · Score: 1

      The Presti's bakery is in nicer quarters, but the donut shop up the hill looks the same as it did 14 years ago.

      -glenn

    12. Re:And occasionally referred to as... by nxj18 · · Score: 1

      Actually, the new name is ITS, not INS. I'm working on the gigabit project, and FYI something that CNN doesn't seem to say, it's a bloody mess. Very amusing and good pay though, considering I'm a student. So if you have any questions about the project, just reply and i'll try to hit back.

      Nate

  40. I just liked this quote. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Vlad Babich, 30, a doctoral student from Ukraine studying management and operations theory, said it will remove barriers to complex mathematical calculations.

    ""Usually we run up against the computer's limitations when we are solving large problems," he said. "Anything you can do faster, it will definitely make a difference." "

    Because my complex mathematical calculations are always limited by connection speed to the internet.

  41. ...And in other news by papasui · · Score: 2

    The RIAA has struck yet again, this time seizing every non-Apple computer at Case Western Reserve. When questioned why they did not confiscate any Apple computers the RIAA stated, " Well, lets put it this way, Steve's nickname around here is Hand"

    1. Re:...And in other news by acaben · · Score: 2

      Steve Jobs blasted the RIAA on Headline News the other day. He just demoed a way to share playlists over any IP network without any configuration, allowing a user to listen to virtually any song with iTunes. He created the iPod whose only "Digital Rights Management" is a sticker which says "Don't Steal Music." I don't think Steve is excactly the biggest friend of the music industry.

    2. Re:...And in other news by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sorry to be off-topic, but I think you missed something.

      The ability to share a playlist does not MP3-swapping make. You can send someone else a list of songs and it will find them on the other person's computer.

      Also, you've obviously never used an iPod. Apple set it up so iTunes allows you to copy music to the iPod, not from it. Sure, you can use it as a portable hard drive, but condemming the iPod as against the DMCA for that is like saying Sharpie's should be illegal becauce they can defeat CD copy protection. Let's ban all forms of transportable media while we're at it.

      The iPod's protection can be broken with various bits of software, but again, condemning the iPod for this would be like condemning makers of CDs because their copy protection can be broken.

      Sorry to go off, but Apple is doing far more to keep music both accessible and legal than anyone else I've seen in some time. Even the "Rip. Mix. Burn." campaign was in keeping with that. You must have the CD to rip it. Apple isn't willing to go to the opressive extremes that Microsoft is with Palladium, but they are trying to keep people honest.

      Maybe Apple just believes that people can be good, and Microsoft (and most everyone else) has forgetten that.

      --
      That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
    3. Re:...And in other news by acaben · · Score: 2

      Ahh, I think you're the one who's missed something. In the age of broadband connections always on, do you think the RIAA cares about the distinction of whether an MP3 exists on a computer or is being streamed. Something tells me they're gonna' consider it stealing either way. I don't agree with the way they feel, but I doubt they'll change their minds based on my slashdot post. And, I, in fact, have an iPod and just yesterday copied 4.38 gigs of music to a new PowerBook I just bought. Nice assumption, but you're just plain wrong on that one. I don't think Apple's trying real hard to keep things legal. And I applaud them for that.

  42. Monitoring multiple Gigabit Links by slashnik · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "Administrators aren't sure what anybody needs that kind of bandwidth for yet, but they are curious to see how it gets used"

    I am interested to find out how the administrators will find out how the links are being used. What hardware/software has the power to track this level of traffic on a switched network.

    Will they be using integrated RMON2 NAM cards in the switches or possibly analysis of Netflow data from the routers.

    However they do it there will be a geat deal of data to crunch

    slashnik

  43. Yes, but will they spend the money to support it? by Futaba-chan · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The big question: will CWRU spend the money to decently support the new version of CWRUnet? I both attended CWRU and worked for the department responsible for network administration (which has changed acronyms several times), and we were constantly plagued by the administration's willingness to spend lots of money for hardware, but not for staff.

    The network administration folks at CWRU have some very clueful geeks (used bash lately?), but when I left, there were never enough of them. All this fancy new hardware will do the university little good unless they give the people running it enough budget to do a first-rate job.

  44. Re:Not sure how its going to be used ? Seriously n by (startx) · · Score: 1

    Looks like they could put something like seek42 to good use! It kicks ass here at Rolla where it was written by a current student, and I'm sure with a network 1000 faster that ours they would surely enjoy it, especially if their pipe the the rest of the internet isn't gigabit.

  45. they will find a way by Metaldsa · · Score: 1

    With my college it doesn't matter how much bandwidth they throw at us it eventually gets used somehow. So much they put filters during parts of the day so the library can actually get online.

    Hopefully it won't all go to kazaa :)

  46. 1.6 Million just for the switches by theManInTheYellowHat · · Score: 1

    Doing just a quickie calculation the switches alone would be 1.6 M (100 / port) and I bet it will be way more than that since I based the 100 / port on an 8 port linksys.

    Seems like a very expensive experiment.

    1. Re:1.6 Million just for the switches by sinnergy · · Score: 2

      Likely more... the equipment to handle this is a lot different than your garden variety CompUSA switch or, for that matter, your run of the mill Cisco.

  47. Got to ask by macdaddy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...what the hell for? I'm the netadmin at Unv and I'm fighting to not run GigE to all my buildings. It simply isn't needed here. I can't imagine running GigE to the desktop. They must have a helluva lot of grant money to waste. The nic cards along aren't cheap. A 3c996 SX card runs about $475 at discount. Are they expecting the users to go out and buy them? That card doesn't have Mac drivers either. I wonder if they expect new Mac users that already have 10/100/1000 to waste a PCI slot for a 1000Base-SX nic. This is just plain weird. I wonder what they connect the building to the campus with... One thing it does do is give the users more than enough umph to DoS most modern processors. It also gives them more than enough umph (if they connect to the campus LAN at say 10GigE to DoS their server farm firewall or worse yet, the actual server. Wanna fill the queue on their I1/I2 border router? Here GigE kids; go have fun.

    1. Re:Got to ask by Geek+In+Training · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A 3c996 SX card runs about $475 at discount

      Seriously, who is selling these people 16,000 fiber NICs that they will need to hook up all the PCs? Or are the students expect to foot the bill, on TOP of the $400 per year tech fee listed in the article?

      Wouldn't this make a lot more sense?

      Newegg.com sells retail boxed, Intel Gigabit cards for $55. So the question is now, how much is the fiber to giga-copper transceiver? :)

      --
      SlashSigTheorem: Humorous, Political, Critical, Constructive- If you have a .sig, someone WILL complai
    2. Re:Got to ask by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3c996 SX card runs about $475 at discount

      Yes, but 3C996-T run only $90 on pricewatch.com

    3. Re:Got to ask by kc8apf · · Score: 1

      My brother actually got to lease a fiber card for his box a few years ago when he was attending case.

      --
      kc8apf
    4. Re:Got to ask by sinnergy · · Score: 2

      Actually, we're using Netgear cards (GA621) for most installations. Getting a fiber to UTP converter will get the Mac folks up and running. Considering we're getting volume discount pricing, the pricewatch prices don't matter much. Our only concern at present is what to do with the Suns. Those GigE cards certainly aren't cheap!

    5. Re:Got to ask by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Um, put them on a 100 megabit subnet.

    6. Re:Got to ask by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Case is anything like UMich, which I attend, then that's a LOT of 100BaseT subnets to create - research universities tend to have lots of Suns all over the place (i.e. in every building).

      If they're gonna create 100BaseT subnets in every building, why bother going GigE?

      Posting anonymously cuz I'm too lazy to log in.

    7. Re:Got to ask by macdaddy · · Score: 2

      True (I was looking last night actually) but they aren't running copper. They're running MMF.

    8. Re:Got to ask by macdaddy · · Score: 2

      The worst thing about going all MMF is that they eliminate the ability for a student to have a laptop, unless that laptop comes with GigE and the student wants to foot the bill for a 1000Base-SX to 1000Base-T converter. Canary makes some. LanCast makes one and it lists for $440. A simple MMF to UTP convertor WILL NOT WORK.

    9. Re:Got to ask by sinnergy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, the fiber has been there since the late 80s, so it's not like we're putting in new fiber. Besides, laptop users will either use 100 Mbps or wireless. I suspect most laptop users will opt for wireless.

      Unfortunately, the article doesn't mention wireless at all. A pity.

    10. Re:Got to ask by macdaddy · · Score: 2

      True. A lot of Unvs aren't permitting wireless though. I've heard of some cases where they send a tech and a sniffer to locate a rogue wireless AP and then they bring the owner before the Unv's security committee. D'oh! The bad part about the 100Mbps is now they have to maintain to seperate networks, which might add overhead. Personally I think 10/100 for an access port is more than enough and will be so for 5 or more years. 10Mb is still world's to 95% of the users out there. Practically no user can fully utilize 100Mb. Installing 1000Mb just isn't worth it unless the cost is nominally more than 1000Mb, as it is in some distribution cases. I'm interested to see what they turn up. This could be quite an interesting project to follow. :)

  48. Who much? by Martigan80 · · Score: 1

    So how much more will tuition cost? Will it be proportional to the bandwidth used?

    --
    This SIG pulled due to lack of funding. (This damn war is costing too much!)
    1. Re:Who much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd suggest reading the article before asking obvious questions. The article says that there will be a new $400 "technology fee", in addition to the $23 grand or so that the tuition already is....

  49. Why fiber and not copper? by carlhirsch · · Score: 1

    As far as I know, most every switch vendor sells gigabit copper ports, and the spec runs over Cat 5/Cat 5e wire as a rule, no Cat6 required.

    My personal experience with fiber has been that it's lovely stuff when you need to avoid EM interference or go farther than 300 meters, but dust on the connections can be a big problem. The idea of fiber to the desktop with users constantly plugging in and removing SC patch cords gives me fits of anxiety.

    Although now that I read the article a bit more closely, it doesn't seem at all clear that the fiber is going to each and every desktop as lowlypeon seems to imply. My guess is these 16000 computers will actually get gigabit copper NICs and the backbone will be fiber.

    --
    . We've got computers, we're tapping phone lines, you know that ain't allowed - Talking Heads, "Life During Wartime"
    1. Re:Why fiber and not copper? by Futaba-chan · · Score: 1
      My guess is these 16000 computers will actually get gigabit copper NICs and the backbone will be fiber.

      No, the campus is already wired with fiber -- presumably, the change is just new network adapters and hubs. It'll be interesting to see how the network topology changes; when I was a student there, the entire network was implemented using just bridges, which simplified many things, but made network storms a real nightmare....

    2. Re:Why fiber and not copper? by tomzyk · · Score: 1

      They didn't explain it in the article, but the whole campus is already layed-out with fiber and has been for a while. I graduated about 3 years ago from Case and when I started there 5 years before that, the whole campus was alreayd set up. All they are doing (according to what they told us at alumni meetings) is changing the switch boards in each of the dorms. No wiring is necessary.

      --
      Karma: NaN
    3. Re:Why fiber and not copper? by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 2

      Fiber may run into every room, but it would seem (to me, anyway) that the "last foot" solution will be a tranceiver and a Cat5 cable into the back of a computer. Some people may choose to install fiber cards, but many people won't feel comfortable enough to have someone play around inside their system.

      --
      That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
    4. Re:Why fiber and not copper? by McCart42 · · Score: 1

      When I was on campus last semester, I had a fiberoptic cable running directly into my computer, as did most CWRU students. Only those with laptops or special needs use ethernet transceivers.

      --
      "I may be quite wrong." - Socrates
  50. gigabit fiber? by Zabu · · Score: 1

    seems a bit expensive to me.

    I work at an Interoperability Lab, and the manager of the gigabit ethernet consortium said the cost per port on the machines would be about $300 apiece. (Not only the fiber NIC's but also the switches). This is going to cost about $5 million to just interface with the fiber.

    But I wouldn't mind if UNH had gigabit ethernet, I can just imagine the abuse.

    --
    It's all good.
    1. Re:gigabit fiber? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UNH? Brian Thomas, sometime geology student, hello :o)

    2. Re:gigabit fiber? by Zabu · · Score: 1

      hi.
      Are you currently a student?

      --
      It's all good.
  51. Re:finally...NOT by sinnergy · · Score: 1

    Yes he will. He'll just have to use a transceiver. *shrug*. Copper is yucky, anyways, especially for installations as large as this.

  52. What it will get used for... by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 2
    but they are curious to see how it gets used."

    Living in an all Computer Engineering floor, I can tell you what it's going to be used for:

    1) Downloading pr0n
    2) Counterstrike
    3) Getting Porn
    4) Downloading every episode of every season of every Star Trek series ever made (including the animated one)
    5) Hosting Porn

    1. Re:What it will get used for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh My God,

      You live on a floor populated entirely by computer engineers. That defeats the entire point of living on campus. The point of living on campus is not high speed internet access, or being able to role out of bed and right into class. The real reason for living on campus is the cute coeds down the hall.

      GET A LIFE!

    2. Re:What it will get used for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just hope everyone buys a few 100 GB drives when they go back in the fall. If people actually share the files they downloaded, it won't take long to fill up that big drive. If I went there, I would put my "well organized" 20GB of mp3's on the network and allow people to download them in a few seconds.

    3. Re:What it will get used for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, my GF is one of those cute co-eds down the hall. Ah, the advantages of dating a fellow Computer Engineering Major.

  53. Is this ADDITIONAL fiber? Fiber since 1992 or so. by Geek+In+Training · · Score: 3, Informative

    I had a friend who was attending CWRU in 1992-1993 whose Frat House (!) had fiber to each room. He had a 386 with an ISA card had an AUI port, which had a fiber transceiver attached. It may have only been attached to a 10 megabit hub/switch, but the fiber was there.

    My classmate took her PowerMac 7100 to CWRU in the fall of 1994, and she also had to buy a fiber to AUI transceiver to hook up her machine in her dorm room. Strosacker auditorium/lecture hall has had fiber ALN drops readily accessable since the early 90s as well.

    So it's my belief that the campus has been wired with fiber for at least 10 years; perhaps they're just upgrading thw switches to Gigabit?

    Why did they run fiber that long ago? Well, they had to do SOMETHING with all that technology grant money they were getting for CWRUnet/Cleveland Freenet besides buy modems... plus the $26,000 a year tuition/board costs at the time probably made it easier as well. *Smirk*

    -RT (Once known as "Iceman" on CFN, as a teen in the early 90s. Scary.)

    --
    SlashSigTheorem: Humorous, Political, Critical, Constructive- If you have a .sig, someone WILL complai
  54. Bandwidth is nice - but usage is better by divitojo · · Score: 2, Informative

    I work at a University now with Gig to every building. I monitor the links constantly and have never see more then 2 or 3% usage, even to the dorms - Why ...

    Because we have not real apps that use it and our link to the Internet is only Frac-T3.

    We even use VoIP and some streaming video tech.

    My Advice - By 100M uplinks (Channel if you need more to other buildings) and spend the savings on a better Internet Pipe and applications.

    Gig is good for servers, not to a building with 50 people in it, or to a desktop!!!!!

    Just my .02$

    1. Re:Bandwidth is nice - but usage is better by op00to · · Score: 1

      Your university must not be doing REAL research! Seriously, if your university doesn't have web applications for registering, or hard-core physics research going on, you may not see a lot of network traffic. I work for Rutgers University http://www.rutgers.edu and some of the hard-core physics machines transfer upwards of 100 gigs >PER DAY to peer institutions over internet 2 and the commodity internet. The urban planning school routinely swaps huge databases with other schools. The med school (UMDNJ) does videoconferencing with all kinds of interesting institutions. We have a brand new fiber network that I would say is used quite enough. There ARE legitimate uses for all this bandwidth.

  55. Homer and College Geek Friends by ejaw5 · · Score: 1

    Geek: we have figured out how to get porn 1 million times faster

    Marge: who needs that much porno?

    Homer: (drools)...ooohhh yyyeea one million times faster.

    --

    $cat /dev/random > Sig
  56. Woohoo! by vidnet · · Score: 1

    Finally we can play Half-Life over VNC!

  57. Why? by sbrodson · · Score: 1

    It is hard to justify such a significant investment on edge connectivity unless all of the core network functions can handle the load. For 1Gbps bandwidth to actually be useful, all of this bandwidth must be aggregated back somewhere and all of the other shared network functions must also be geared for this incredible bandwidth.

    For example, the connection from the campus to the Internet is a bottleneck. If the campus has 45 Mbps to the Internet and this must be shared by everyone, then, as a practical matter, no one will get more then his/her share of the 45 Mbps no matter how much bandwidth his/her desktop is capable of handling.

    To take advantage of the speed, you need to invest in a backbone capable of handling all of this bandwidth (so that it is not oversubscribed and therefore irrelevant), sufficient internet capacity, large servers (with 10 Gbps NICs) and a lot of other infrastructure.

    Additionally, few laptops will be fast enough to take advantage of the Gbps speed. I doubt whether a PCMCIA adapter can support the throughput required.

    The ability to use Voice over IP and streaming video is nice, but can be done over a 100 Mbps pipe. Additionally, the "coolness" factor will probably serve the University's marketing well. Additionally, it probably means that the University will have more years before required upgrades. However, I do not see the justification for this.

    1. Re:Why? by kc8apf · · Score: 1

      You obviously have no idea as to how much intra-network file swapping is done at Case. When my brother attended, it was difficult to hit 100Mbps because the line to the dorm couldn't handle everyone pulling that fast.

      It's not so much Internet traffic at Case that's the problem, but rather intra-dorm traffic.

      --
      kc8apf
    2. Re:Why? by sbrodson · · Score: 1

      Doesn't the addition of edge bandwidth just complicate that problem?

      The real issue for intra-dorm bandwidth depends upon the size of the trunks between the dorm and the layout of the network. Just giving every individual the ability to pull more bandwidth doesn't help.

      The truly interesting thing to see here is the network infrastructure that supports the bandwidth.

  58. Lucky Bastards by stu42j · · Score: 1

    My old school (UTD) laughed at the idea of giving us 100mbps!

    Gotta have wireless 'cause it's so cool!

  59. What they will do with all of that bandwidth by tomzyk · · Score: 1

    Having graduated from CWRU a few years ago, I still visit the campus and sit in on meetings that discuss campus improvements. I was only informed of this technology at the end of this past school year and was, as can be expected, astounded... and also a little jealous of my younger brother who is still going to school there.

    In the meeting we were informed that a deal was struck with Sprint and that "in the near future" (possibly 2 or 3 years) they plan on setting up the entire campus with wireless connectivity. Not only will the students' computers be wired, but plans have discussed to get a mobile phone to every student; so rather than have a phone for each room, each student would get a phone now. (And since people that go to school there know that Sprint service currently sucks, I'm sure they will be installing a tower or two on campus as well.)

    Plans were also discussed on having all data to-and-from dormrooms be wired through this network within the near future. (All computer network, wire-based phone system, television, etc...)

    --
    Karma: NaN
    1. Re:What they will do with all of that bandwidth by Grant+Hill · · Score: 1

      hey tomzyk, you forgot to mention they also sold their soul to CISCO. I am not sure but I also heard something about 10-gig equipment being used for backbone. It was in one of the news groups early this year. Someone else out there know?

      hilldaddy

  60. hmmm... by twistedcubic · · Score: 1


    Administrators aren't sure what anybody needs that kind of bandwidth for yet, but they are curious to see how it gets used."

    I guess that's what they'll say when the BSA comes a knockin at their door.

  61. It makes me cry... by gsergiu · · Score: 0

    It makes me cry, when i think about my poor 56kb dial-up connection at home. About my 2Mb connection at work (of witch i used to be very proud :)) Cmon' grow up, i'll get one connection like that some day.....

  62. do you have the right idea? by Jacer · · Score: 1

    it sounds like everyone thinks they're getting a gigabit to the internet, seems to me like they're getting a gigabit only acrossed campus, how useful can that really be? now we all can have our own UT servers?

    --
    --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
  63. easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pr0n, RIAA regulation breaks, and LOTS of streaming video!

  64. Why not... by Dthoma · · Score: 1

    Since this is going to be pretty expensive for what is effectively a survey, why not just ask students to fill out a proper survey saying what they'd use the bandwidth for? Just add in some of the methods for privacy discussed here and you'll have an idea of what students use bandwidth for without the expense of installing it. It wouldn't cost more than a few thousand dollars to carry it out, way cheaper than putting in fiber connections and Ethernet.

    --

    Note to M1-ers: a curt but otherwise insightful message is not "Flamebait" or "Troll".

  65. In Related News by Snuffub · · Score: 5, Funny

    In related news the university has also been sued by the RIAA. In a writen statment the spokesman for the RIAA said "Of course were sueing What the hell else do you think theyll use that network for besides stealing our intelectual property."

    This suit is the first in a series of legal actions that the RIAA hopes will solve the P2P dilema. The longterm goal of the law suits is to return everyone to 9600kbps modems or as the same spokesman was quoted saying "If users cant handel the responsibility that comes with a broadband connection we'll have to limit it to corpate america, the last bastion of trust and integrity in america today."

    --
    --aiee
    1. Re:In Related News by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 1

      The RIAA wants us to have 9600 kbps modems?????

      --
      "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
    2. Re:In Related News by Snuffub · · Score: 2

      oops, chalk that one up to lack of sleep.

      --
      --aiee
    3. Re:In Related News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I take it they don't teach spelling at Princeton.

      "...the four years at clown college..."
      "I'll thank you not to refer to Princeton that way!"

    4. Re:In Related News by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 1

      Definitely a lack of sleep. You were dreaming.

      --
      "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
  66. Secret Monitoring Experiment by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 2

    It's actually a test to see how many people connect their computer to their dorm phone line and sell Internet access over the university system!!

    And it's done by ALIENS!!! ALIENS!!!

    --
    That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
  67. *Can* they use it? by fm6 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Everyone seems to forget that network bandwidth is just part of the equation. How many people at Case Western have systems capable of processing that much data?

    Where I work, we just got around to upgrading the network from 10BaseT to 100BaseT. Things did get faster -- but not ten times as fast. In a few extreme cases, apps that transfer umpteen megabytes in a short span were maybe 2 or 3 times as fast. Fifty percent was more typical.

    1. Re:*Can* they use it? by alienmole · · Score: 1
      I suspect this is part of the point of the upgrade. When students start measuring (or theorizing) and find that it's quite difficult to generate 1Gbps data streams from a PC, you might start seeing research projects about how to make PCs faster, how to overcome internal bottlenecks, etc.

      To really take full advantage of the performance on individual workstations, they'll have to upgrade their machines quite significantly. 1Gbps is at the limit of what the standard PCI bus can sustain, and the storage buses like IDE and SCSI only reach those speeds at the high end (ATA/133 or Serial ATA, and Ultra-160 or -320). If they're simply putting gigabit cards into ordinary old machines, you're absolutely right that they'll get little to no benefit over 100Mbps.

  68. Why??? by tapped_spine · · Score: 1

    I can simultaneously stream 2 DivX movies and 2 mp3s around my house with a mere 100mbps lan (only 4 boxes now) - why would anybody need more? Serving uncompressed DVDs? It'll be a loooong time before I need any more bandwidth. Hell, broadband internet access tops out at 10mbps (on a good day). What's the point? Pure science? Not a troll, please enlighten me.

  69. Crutial Hard drive needs there. by two-bookoo! · · Score: 0
    Hurry, someone set up a local store to sell hard drives. You are going to have a run all year long on the largest capasity drives currently avail.

    Just an idea, but who is to stop them from shipping the HD's else where with say 80 gig's of MP3's or Warez. I could see that turning in to a very luctritive thing to do.

    Wait that would be lucritive now even on 1.5 cable connections- download all sorts of nonsence- sell the drive for 30-50 more then you paid for it. Interesting....

    1. Re:Crutial Hard drive needs there. by two-bookoo! · · Score: 0

      Intesting- Maybe there is still a use for the USPS. They can finally stop raising the price of stamps.

  70. cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They mean fiber drops to every floor/class room right? right? Can you just imagine the tech support night mare from simply all of the bent fiber cable from the wall to the computers let alone replacement cost? 4" of fiber vs 4" of cat5... What is probably much more likely would be to have fiber drops at ever dorm floor and every classroom which would then be split by a gig switch with cat5. Anything other then that is just way to cost ineffective. Right?

    And even then it will hardly top what CSH had back in the ninties with its own server room with fiber drops and it own power just for the ~40 students living on that floor. Now that is a fun place to goto school. http://www.csh.rit.edu/

    1. Re:cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong! All the fiber has been installed since '89 and works great. The whole campus has it, with the exception of a couple buildings that were wired up with thinwire back in the old days.

      So I think it does top RIT. Sorry....

  71. Reserve University? by fm6 · · Score: 2

    OK, then, what's a Reserve University? Is it anything like a Junior University? As in Leland Stanford Junior University.

    1. Re:Reserve University? by Masem · · Score: 2

      During the formation of the 13 original states, many statehood claims laid out their potental boundaries from coast-to-coast (despite not having been charted. ) Conneticut claimed the land west of Penn. bounded by the same latitudes the state was on (41 to 42deg 2') This was called their Western Reserve. Shortly after this, of course, these claims were given up in lieu of western expansion and federal pressure (late 1700s). More info at an encyclopedia of Cleveland history. Thus, "Western Reserve" is all one phase, and can't be split up.

      --
      "Pinky, you've left the lens cap of your mind on again." - P&TB
      "I can see my house from here!" - ST:
    2. Re:Reserve University? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er... Junior Universities don't exist. Leland Stanford Jr. died, and his daddy founded the university in his name..

    3. Re:Reserve University? by fm6 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Thus, "Western Reserve" is all one phase, and can't be split up.
      It can and is. People don't learn language by studying obscure rules. (And the one you've cited sets some kind of record for obscurity.) They learn by listening and using. People hear "Case Western" and they say "Case Western". No amount of rule-citing is going to change that. Deal with it.
    4. Re:Reserve University? by dohcvtec · · Score: 1
      It can and is...
      You're right, anything can happen and does happen, but that doesn't mean it's correct, however petty or semantic. The parent was noting how the now commonplace (even accepted) shortening of the name isn't grammatically/historically correct. You may not agree with his insistence on correctness, but you can't say he's wrong.
      --
      -- Never hit a man with glasses. Hit him with a baseball bat.
    5. Re:Reserve University? by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 2
      I think that the point is that it's actually
      Case { Western Reserve} University, as opposed to
      {Case Western} Reserve University

      There's a definite meaning change when you understand it that way.

      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    6. Re:Reserve University? by Feynman · · Score: 1

      CWRU was formed from the "merger" of Case Institute of Technology and Western Reserve University. My dad has a Masters degree from Western Reserve, ca. 1964.

    7. Re:Reserve University? by fm6 · · Score: 2
      ...but that doesn't mean it's correct, however petty or semantic.
      What do you mean by "correct"? A language is just a set of conventions for communicating. There's no English Language God laying down some set of Platonic Ideals for Right Speaking. There's just a lot of fallible humans struggling to communicate. The written rules, which are famously incomplete and inconsistent, are recorded -- not dictated -- by students of language, who are always the first to point out that they study the way people use language, not some arbitrary notion of how people should use language.
    8. Re:Reserve University? by fm6 · · Score: 2

      And I care about this because....

    9. Re:Reserve University? by dohcvtec · · Score: 1

      Actually, I was referring to "correct" as in the full proper name. I don't know Jack Squat about linguistics and I'll agree with you that languages evolve, but a proper name is a proper name (unless there's a caveat about that, too.) One could make the same argument about e.g. Coca-Cola. Everybody calls it Coke, but technically the proper (correct in my terms) name of the product is still Coca-Cola. Just as the author of the parent post, someone with an interest in Coca-Cola might say that the ...shortened form [Coke] is still reviled today...

      --
      -- Never hit a man with glasses. Hit him with a baseball bat.
    10. Re:Reserve University? by fridgerater · · Score: 1

      As a matter of fact, CWRU, or at least the Western Reserve University part of it, has a distinguished history. It was there that Michelson and Morley carried out their famous experiment showing that the speed of light was invariant. There is even an award offered in their names. (see hthttp://www.phys.cwru.edu/events/mmal.php) Sorry, just switched to Mozilla from Netscape and I don't know how to insert a site.

    11. Re:Reserve University? by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      You know, I'm almost always giving people the exact same language, and I strongly agree with you.

      However, in this case, while there might not be a difference between "right" and "wrong", there are certain rules about how people *understand* the grammar that they hear, based upon observations. That's what the "rules" of grammar are. So just like the word "you" is the same as the subject and object (unlike "He" which becomes "Him" when it's the object), so should "who". The only people who say "whom" use it as an artificial rule superficially added on top of their true language processors. So noone would say "I gave it to he," but people say "Who did you give to?" even though 'Who' is the object.

      So you're right, the "rules" of language are *descriptive* and not *prescriptive*.

      But your complaint doesn't really apply here. It's kind of like a "misplaced modifier"

      There is nothing *wrong* about the following sentence: "They *only* saw each other during meals"

      However, according to the *descriptive* rules of grammar, if you are trying to say that they didn't see anyone else but each other during their meals you should say: "They saw *only* each other during meals."

      And if you mean to say that they never see each other except during their meals you should say: "They saw each other *only* during meals"

      I am saying this not based on "some arbitrary notion of how people should use language," but based on my understanding of what sort of syntax is commonly used in English.

      So the difference between:
      Case { Western Reserve} University, as opposed to
      {Case Western} Reserve University

      Is not about what is correct and what is incorrect. Neither of them are correct or incorrect, but they just say different things.

      The second one says there something called a "Reserve University" and that CWRU is such a University.

      Yes, "A language is just a set of conventions for communicating". And based on the conventions of modern American English, CWRU is "Case { Western Reserve} University" and not "{Case Western} Reserve University".

    12. Re:Reserve University? by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      Blagh, first line should be "argument" not "language".

    13. Re:Reserve University? by fm6 · · Score: 2
      Well if it's just a matter of the "proper" versus informal name, why say anything at all? I've never heard anybody from Coca-Cola making an issue about "Coke". In fact, they use it themselves.

      Besides which, Slashdot is a pretty informal forum. Or hadn't you noticed? ;)

    14. Re:Reserve University? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I've never heard anybody from Coca-Cola making an issue about "Coke". In fact, they use it themselves.

      Yes, the people from Coca-Cola use "Coke", but people associated with Case Western Reserve University do not call it "Case Western." (The nickname for "Western Reserve University" was "Reserve", so a case could be made for "Case Reserve.")

      I personally think that people who insist on calling CWRU "Case Western" are displaying a false (and uninformed) familiarity.

      It's sort of like presuming to call someone named Charles "Charlie", when everybody who actually knows Charles knows that the nickname he goes by is "Chuck." Those who call him "Charlie" may think they're showing a sophisticated knowledge of Charles, but instead are displaying the exact opposite.

    15. Re:Reserve University? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >CWRU, or at least the Western Reserve University part of it, has a distinguished history. It was there that Michelson and Morley carried out their famous experiment showing that the speed of light was invariant.

      It might be worth noting that Michelson was associated with Case, while Morley was associated with Western Reserve. So, faculty members at the two schools were collaborating 80 years before their federation. Michelson was awarded America's first Nobel in Physics in 1907.

    16. Re:Reserve University? by dohcvtec · · Score: 1
      It's sort of like presuming to call someone named Charles "Charlie"...

      Couldn't have said it better myself. I knew Coke was a bad example when I looked at a can and saw "Coke." :-/
      --
      -- Never hit a man with glasses. Hit him with a baseball bat.
    17. Re:Reserve University? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just wanted to point out that an acceptable shortened name for CWRU (pronounced "crew", btw) is Case Reserve, though no one uses that. The reason Case Western is not acceptable is because when the University was federated in 1967 by the joining of Case Institute of Technology and Western Reserve University, the new moniker Case Wester Reserve Univ., was adopted. However, to dispense with the Reserve in the name tends to insult those high-profile donors that attended that institution. To use only the Western also clearly makes no sense as it is only an adjective describing the Reserve, and the Reserve is the important part of the history. Unfortunately, many of the alumni are also offended when people call the University "Case." Personally, I don't care and I would rather see the name made into a shorter form (ie. can actually fit into spaces where you are asked to write the university you attended) largely to make name recognition easier, since right now we have people suggesting CWRU is a junior college (try out the workload and then make that suggestion) and the repeat questions of whether it is a military academy (in reference to Reserve).

  72. Case networking, the early days by Animats · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Case was into networking very early, but not too successfully. In the late 1960s, Case was briefly on the ARPANET, but became the only site to be kicked off by ARPA because their R&D project didn't produce much. An early laser link (helium-neon, in air) carried 2400 baud synchronous data for a card reader/printer across Cedar Avenue.

    Case was once famous for doing the wrong thing really well. Just as interactive computing started to work, Case developed one of the best batch operating systems of the era. This was so cost-effective that it kept Case studends on punched cards much later than other comparable schools. The entire school ran on a 1 MIPS machine, with enough free time to support a private company selling excess time to commercial users.

  73. is this from a dedicated donation ? by guybarr · · Score: 1


    this is what many people don't understand:

    some of the strange priorities of universities stems from dedicated donations: the university must BY CONTRACT use the money from a specific donation in a specific way.

    so, if someone decided to give a donation for such a specific project, it doesn't matter that the money would be 100X time more usefull in adding to the local library, since they can't use the money that way.

    it's a pitty, because many times the sexy subjects are by far not the effective ones.

    --
    Working for necessity's mother.
  74. Limited by server by bafreer · · Score: 0
    I can't possible imagine what they could use it for! Obviously people point out: pr0n, warez, blah, blah, blah. They forget to account for the server that they download from.

    How many people with broadband are still limited to 6k/s for any given song on kazaa? Most people on p2p don't have broadband. Even if you are connected to a massive corporate server, do you realistically think that you will get 100mB/s? maybe 1mB, 2mB max!

    How many student computers do you think can handle 100mB/s downloads from their smb server? Even with resnet sharing, it should make little difference!

    One notable exception: around 10:00pm or so, EVERYONE is online, which will lower bandwidth to 50-100k. Maybe this one situation would be fixed.

    "Marge, they have the internet on computers now!"- Homer

    1. Re:Limited by server by McCart42 · · Score: 1

      You're exactly right, but the point is that with the increased bandwidth, you can be downloading more streams of 6 k/s songs on kazaa. So you won't get a single song faster but you can still utilize that bandwidth. There will always be a way to utilize the excess bandwidth, trust me. Of course, before too much longer we're going to start hitting the PCI bandwidth threshold, but we haven't hit it yet, not even with gigabit ethernet.

      --
      "I may be quite wrong." - Socrates
  75. people who don't know technology writing about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    that story makes it sound like every computer has a gigabit connection to the internet... all they have is a gigabit connection to each other...

    sure it'll be great for all those things (full motion this, high definition that), but it's still all INTERNAL to their own network...

    I'm guessing they have the standard frac-T3 to connect them to the net... you'll just get to the router faster, and I bet they won't have any lag playing Wolfenstein with each other =P

  76. Re:Is this ADDITIONAL fiber? Fiber since 1992 or s by tomzyk · · Score: 1

    Just letting you know that you are correct. Fiber has been layed out all over the campus for quite a while. (I started there in 1994 and fiber was already everywhere.) And it is EVERYWHERE. Computer labs, dorms, fraternity/sorority houses, lecture halls, classrooms, libraries, and I even believe some food courts. They are not (from what I have been informed) currently installing any fiber; they are just replacing the switches in each building. They already started with some dorms and Greek houses a month or so ago and promised to have all student housing completed by the beginning of this coming school year.

    --
    Karma: NaN
  77. Who needs lots of bandwidth? by stewby18 · · Score: 1, Informative
    For a group of people who are theoretically computer-savvy, there are certainly a lot of really short-sighted posts here.

    To everyone who wants to know what all this bandwidth could actually be used for, and why bother if the rest of the internet is generally slower, I have only this to say:

    640K of memory should be enough for anybody
    1. Re:Who needs lots of bandwidth? by SpaceJunkie · · Score: 1

      Please mod parent up as funny or informative. Sometimes programmers(I speak for myself as much as any other) and techs are so arrogant, that they fail to see outside of their own little world.

      Yes I cannot think of any applications for such a large bandwidth - but I am dman sure if I had it I could use it. I am sure 10 or so years ago current broadband bandwidth would have been seen as excessive, or DVD and HD storage capacity. What would you do with 80Gb outside of the server space?

      Come on folks - lets discuss the possibilities here... For one I am looking forward to usable video conferencing with a shared virtual desktop - like VNC and video conf on the same machine. or neat parallel processing clusters for A-life tasks.

      --
      OrionRobots.co.uk - Robots From sol
  78. Edge Devices by Seldon_21 · · Score: 1

    This smells like BS. Why run fiber? Why not Copper? What type of back-end are they running(Cisco, Nortel)? What computer can keep up with a 100/Mbits? Has anyone ever seen a system that can handle full duplex connections? Bandwidth doesn't solve problems, created by man.

    1. Re:Edge Devices by Da_Monk · · Score: 2

      0) it isn't BS
      1) because the original plan was ATM over fiber, and they ran fiber all over campus.
      2) fiber is more flexible in terms of what runs on it (somewhat) and better for long distances than copper.
      3) cisco everywhere
      4) uhm, many computers can keep up with it. but the bandwidth is almost never fully utilized. so this is kind of a moot question.
      5) any machine hooked up to a switch is doing full duplex.
      6) the main point here is that intra-campus communication will be wicked fast allowing better collaboration. many students will not realize the basic facats of networking in that you never use the full pipe, that bandwidth is width not speed, and that the firewall will most likely still be 100BaseT to the gateway.
      the press is taking this way out of context. mainly the supplier of the ATM cards we were using has gone away (FORE bought by marconi, currently laying people off like crazy). the ATM cards got better, but ethernet is more common, plus, if you have a campus wired for gigabit it will do fine at lower levels of ethernet (10/100)

      the aim was never to increase pr0n and war3z, although these will be issues. the tech people at CWRU are very much on the ball and nip FTP warez sites in the butt pretty much as soon as they appear.

  79. JMU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    James Madison University has been using fiber in it's new ISAT facility for more than a year.

  80. Must...contain...self.... by dcigary · · Score: 3, Funny

    .....must...not state...obvious.... .......Arrrrrrrrrrggggggghhhh!

    (snap)

    Wow! Can you image the Beowulf cluster they could set up with this???

    --
    ...my Karma ran over your Dogma...
  81. Playstation 3 by Picass0 · · Score: 2

    Sounds like a backbone for Sony's Cell Computing.

  82. Re: question technology investments == flamebait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember, anytime you question technology, people call it flaimbait.
    Next time I question technology investments, I'll post anonymously..

  83. WHAT LUNIX FAGGOT MODDED THIS POST? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess moderators that can't read are a good companion for webmasters that KAN'T SPEL.

  84. Dubious financial thinking? by swb · · Score: 2

    Administrators aren't sure what anybody needs that kind of bandwidth for yet, but they are curious to see how it gets used.

    At a wildly conservative estimate of $75 per run, that's over $1 million being spent "to see what happens." I'm all in favor of the experimental nature of the University and I'm strongly in favor of trying to buy ahead of the curve where possible.

    But...couldn't an experiment to see what everyone might do with 1 Gbps fiber be scaled to a quarter of that size or even a tenth of that size and the rest of the money spent on other equipment or infrastructure needs?

    It might future-proof them, but AFAIK Gbit ethernet is running just fine on four pair Cat 5, which they probably already have installed. The annoying nature of fiber optics has IMHO kept it from being "the next step" in end-user distributive network technology -- it's fragile, complex to fix and the interfaces are more expensive and non-standard on most equipment that 16k people would use.

    Given the budget crunches that most states are feeling, it seems strangely inappropriate to blow at least $1 million to see what happens (yes, CWRU gets money from Ohio).

    1. Re:Dubious financial thinking? by sinnergy · · Score: 3, Informative

      There's no Cat5 because we already have the fiber network in place. It's been in place since the late 80s for the most part.

      It isn't necessarily more fragile (Ever tug too hard on a cat5 cable and have the whole thing come apart?), but, you are right, it tends to be more expensive.

    2. Re:Dubious financial thinking? by JFalcon25 · · Score: 1

      Yup, fiber since 1988. Expensive..of course, students living in the residence halls have to pay a $400 technology fee to help pay for this upgrade. :)

    3. Re:Dubious financial thinking? by cei · · Score: 2

      I lived in Kusch from '88 to '90 and had fiber to my Mac SE when they flipped the switch in '89. I kicked the cord once and it cost me $80 to replace... ceramic tip on the fiber cable...

      --
      This sig intentionally left justified.
  85. This isn't really a new thing at CWRU by streak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Case Western used to have an ATM network available to all of its students which was all super fast and had high bandwidth. However, they found that a pure network of ATM was too unstable (there were numerous random outages that got really annoying) and started switching back to ethernet.
    However it looks like they are not going to settle with 100mbps and just go straight to Gigabit.
    I guess they like to have their network be as fast as possible.

  86. Lie in ben, and watch lectures over 1GB by oliverthered · · Score: 2

    If Ihad a GB network connection and was at collage I'd make sure I could get the leatures pumped through to my bed room.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    1. Re:Lie in ben, and watch lectures over 1GB by h4mmer5tein · · Score: 1

      Lucky Ben :)

  87. The Simpsons seem appropriate here by disco_stu00 · · Score: 1

    Nerd: I developed a program to download porn one million times faster.
    Marge: Does anyone really need that much porn?
    Homer: (salivating noise) Ahhhhhhhh million times faster.

  88. What do they have coming into the the univ. itself by qurob · · Score: 1


    Like 50 OC3's?

  89. SSNs by Maryck · · Score: 1

    A SSN by itself is not that big of a deal since to do anything worthwhile with an SSN requires knowing who its assigned to. If you can make that connection, then concievably you could use it to track someone's movements around campus, but even that's limited since only the dorms and a couple buildings require card access (at least when I was there).
    One risk I can see is if the school still uses a points system keyed off of your card. When I went there, you could buy points for your ID which could be used to buy stuff at the campus stores and some of the cafeterias. I imagine someone could potentially pirate your SSN for that purpose, although we're still talking only a couple hundred dollars at max.

    -Mike (CWRU class of '97)

    1. Re:SSNs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The SSN works using security by obscurity.
      The problem is that the other pieces of
      information are generally public knowledge,
      so deriving who owns an SSN is (much) easier than
      knowing someone's identity and guessing the SSN.

      Getting the ssn and binding it to a person is
      a big deal (as the other poster mentioned),
      allowing such badnesses as identity theft.

      They need to close this down, it is a big
      exposure.

  90. Another minor correction by beanyk · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    News Flash: nobody cares. As an alumni, I can assure you that in the real world, the name of our mutual alma mater is just too damn big. So chill.

    Unless you have multiple personalities, I suggest you're only an alumnus (or alumna, depending on gender). alumni is plural.

  91. age old problem... by room101 · · Score: 2

    Can you say "solution in search of a problem"?

    One of those "our school is better than yours" type of things, I guess.

    --
    room101 -- how much can you stand before they break you?
    (they always break you eventually)
  92. Might not be as impressive as it sounds by uradu · · Score: 2

    My wife is getting her Ph.D. at CWRU, so I've had a chance to check out their infrastructure. CWRU jumped on the ATM bandwaggon in the early 90s, back when ATM was the holy grail of networking (was there any Byte edition that didn't have an article on ATM?), so they deployed ATM-over-fiber to every office and every dorm room on campus. Talk about misreading the future. Now I guess since they've got all that fiber in place already, they're probably thinking they might as well capitalize on it and move to gigabit. I can only assume that they're making use of the same fiber, otherwise they'd be out a whole lotta money. This is more of a case of a lucky second chance than exceptional foresight.

    I'm also not particularly impressed with their IT department. They like touting their computing horn, but my wife wasn't able to obtain one of their elusive ethernet-over-ATM adapters for two summer sessions now, being forced instead to connect via their notoriously flakey PPP dial-in at glacial modem speeds--while on campus. So much for their leadership in advanced campus networking. Oh, but they do have 802.11b in their main library, so I guess they get one point for that.

  93. VEporn I guess by cafeteria · · Score: 1

    Probably more than 1on1

  94. 10GB=Linux? by intermodal · · Score: 1

    i'm not saying that to be a pro-linux preacher, but one thing they could certainly accomplish with this system is a) more easily downloading ISOs to install from and b) mirroring bottlenecked servers' projects. Of course realistically it'll be used mostly for gaming, pr0n, and war3z...

    --
    In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
  95. Just for bragging rights? by opcenter · · Score: 1

    ...or is it to battle the insane bandwidth sucked up by thousands of students downloading full DVD quality porn?

  96. Curious as to how it gets used? by nvts · · Score: 2, Insightful
    What kind of moron can't take an eduated guess as to what some 19 year old away from home able to stay up all night without anyone yelling at him will do. He'll buy a few 100 gig drives and load up on pron to last him the whole semester. He'll stay up all night and play his newly pirated version of UT2003. He'll have a permament ftp connection downloading hordes of mp3s and more than likely run his own ftp server filled with mp3s.

    How it will be used. Get real use your brain and think what it was like being 19 and away from home and without a girlfriend cuz your a geek.

    1. Re:Curious as to how it gets used? by Quill_28 · · Score: 1

      ummm.. fiber to the desktop won't improve downloads speeds from the Internet.

  97. NetBoot by Aram+Fingal · · Score: 1

    Apple's netboot allows Macs to boot from a server. You can have one specially configured copy of MscOS on a machine running Mac OS X Server and then have a whole lab of Macs boot from it. They don't enen need to have hard drives. This is, of course, extremely bandwith intensive and that's why Apple has been pushing gigabit ethernet.

  98. throughput? by pr0nbot · · Score: 1

    How does the real-life performance of gigabit compare to disk i/o? Does this mean that file access via a network file server would actually perform better than a local drive?

  99. One thing to say.... by h4mmer5tein · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "You lucky, lucky bastards!"

  100. interactive video pron games by Alien54 · · Score: 2
    the same way everyone else does... music, porn, and games.

    Probably someone will start coding those interactive video pron games

    I leave it as an exercise for your imaginations as to the best way to implement this.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  101. Yes, fiber, no copper by Jandar0 · · Score: 5, Informative

    As a current CWRU student who is currently living in the dorms over the summer and currently has his computer hooked up to the network I can try to clear up any confusion on this =) The network does, indeed, feature fiber running to every desktop. As several individuals have stated previously, the University ran fiber optic cable to every dorm room and office several years back (longer back than I remember). That same fiber is now being used to provide gigabit connections to every room. Every student was (or will be) provided a Netgear GA621 gigabit fiber optic network card for their personal computer, which does, indeed, equate to "fiber to the desktop" =)

    1. Re:Yes, fiber, no copper by Bloody+Bastard · · Score: 1

      Are they going to give PCMCIA adapters to those who have notebooks? I found a 100 Mbits Fiber PCMCIA card for only $ 405 =)

    2. Re:Yes, fiber, no copper by Jandar0 · · Score: 1

      Individuals with computers that do not support the fiber gigabit cards (for example, many mac computers, which do oftentimes have GB ethernet cards for UTP rather than fiber) are getting somewhat shafted in the switch, and are being issued 100MB tranceivers to convert the signal from fiber to copper for their computers. Thus, they aren't seeing the same kind of improvement. I am not certain if the same applies for laptops, but I imagine that it does.

    3. Re:Yes, fiber, no copper by frankie · · Score: 2
      the University ran fiber optic cable to every dorm room and office several years back (longer back than I remember)

      I certainly hope you (as a current student) don't remember, because it happened in 1988. That summer CWRU sent out special computer offers to everyone which included the necessary fiber NIC. Had to give back the NIC when I left, but I kept that SE/30 for a long time.

      p.s. Glaser sucks!

    4. Re:Yes, fiber, no copper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Glaser sucks!

      Hey, Glaser rules! (At least it did when I lived there 30 years ago.) But I won't say anything nasty about Michelson or Kusch.

    5. Re:Yes, fiber, no copper by nxj18 · · Score: 1

      In addition, if you have a laptop, we actually switch out the connection to your port in the building to 100 from 1000, so you really are getting the shaft. Plus you have to buy your own PCMCIA card if you need. Plus if you're in a room with multiple users and one port, the whole room shares a 100 UTP/Fiber media converter (fyi, they're not technically transcievers) and a 10/100 UTP switch, so it sucks even more. Naturally, there are more cost effective ways to do this, using a Netgear FS509, but unfortunately due to the lack of planning, it doesn't look like it's going to happen.

  102. Immersive Video Conferencing by istartedi · · Score: 2

    Immersive Video Conferencing? (cough)pr0n(cough)

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  103. Re: 100base 2x-3x over 10base by bored · · Score: 1

    This is not unusual. The problem is particularly noticable with the upgrade from 100base to 1000base. A little time tuning the network infrastructure (using non standard MTU, etc) can see huge gains in performace.

    Most modern PC's won't have any problem handling the bandwith of 1000base. There is plenty of PCI bandwith and memory bandwith for DMA. A tuned IP stack on a reasonable CPU won't have a problem either. Finding an application that can handle it is going to be a little harder.

  104. Fast Ethernet should be enough by Bloody+Bastard · · Score: 1

    I think Fast Ethernet and some switches would be enough, unless they are planning to use app servers or something like that. Probably they won't have a gigabit link connecting with Internet for each student...

    I would like to know how expensive it will be when they start to have problems with those fibers =)

    1. Re:Fast Ethernet should be enough by zeuropa · · Score: 1

      The fibers are already in...have been for quite some time...I think most of the problems have already been taken care of.

  105. ssh & X by Boone^ · · Score: 2

    I would have loved fibre in my dorm room back in college, as kicking back X applications to one's PC wouldn't have been a chore. It was ok with 10Mbit, but the latency drop and bandwidth boost with fibre would have made it seem like I was really in the engineering labs.

  106. Re:Is this ADDITIONAL fiber? Fiber since 1992 or s by Nutsodog · · Score: 1

    I was a student at Case from 93-97 and lived in the dorms. At that time they had both Single-mode and Multi-mode fiber running to every room (2 drops of each for doubles). I think it was '96 when we switched to ATM over multi-mode fiber.

    To get that increase in bandwidth they must have updated the switches and run everyone on the more expensive (unused) single mode cables.

    I am sure it is not new fiber. It's the stuff that has been installed for a decade.

  107. Re:yummy .. watch this space! by pieterh · · Score: 2

    Yes... if/when there is a legit application for gigabit P2P, it will probably emerge in arenas like this, before making its way to the wide world.
    Gigabit P2P would be a great way to exhaust the excessive capacity of the post-WorldCom era.
    My personal bet: P2P Reality TV. Maybe I should go and patent this... :)

  108. This is OLD NEWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The College I worked for 5+ years ago already did everything they are doing here. That college is The Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs at Syracuse University. Besides having gigabit ethernet, and full touch screen controlled electronic classrooms with data ports at every seat, they also run the largest news server in the world and are sporting a building wide wireless network thanks to my installation expertise.

  109. Re:Is this ADDITIONAL fiber? Fiber since 1992 or s by sinnergy · · Score: 2

    Actually, all of the fiber cards to be used are still multimode. There isn't a need (yet) to use the singlemode fibers. Besides, the multimode equipment is far cheaper!

  110. TCP window sizes? by mikeee · · Score: 2

    Of course, most of their machines will most likely be configured such that they can't use that full bandwidth over anything but a subnet anyhow, so this is kinda ridiculous...

  111. A use for gigabit . . . by Betelgeuse · · Score: 4, Informative

    There are a lot of people on here complaining that gigabit just isn't good for anything and no one needs a connection that fast. While I agree that is true in general, there are (non-porn) uses for the connections that universities can really use. For example, I'm a student in an astronomy department. An image from an average-sized digital detector is, oh, 300 MB. Before people start yelling about compression, realize that we have to retain all the information. Of course, this doesn't take into account the fact that there are mosaic cameras that put out a few gigs per image. So, as you can see, a night of 40 images or so can really add up. For us, it makes sense to not only have lots of storage space (mmmmm. . . 1 TB array), but also to have fast connections. We are just starting to experiment with gigabit-over-copper now, and I must say that, so far, it seems to be totally worth it. Having to wait 30 seconds for an image to display on your screen (because it's stored on the disk array at the other end of the office) is a huge pain.

    So, I'm not saying that CWRU needs to wire all of their dorms, but gigabit certainly makes sense in some areas.

    --
    I couldn't tell if you were experimenting with poor-man's cryogenics or looking for the orange sherbet.
    1. Re:A use for gigabit . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I'm moving 80GB across my 100Mbps network at home as I write this. I started the move this morning. And it'll be done by the time I go home for lunch. I have a 300GB raid, since I don't need more than that at the moment. I've thought about going gigabit, but the price is still too high for me. But I find it interesting that a university feels the need to upgrade to gigabit over fibre at this time considering the costs involved. Copper gigabit technology is slowly falling in price and is less than $100 per client. I'm curious how much the university is spending on upgrading to gigabit prematurely. I'm sure there's no undergrad student who needs more than a few gigs of harddrive space for data storage and its unlikely that they'd need to move that data on a daily basis. Gigabit backbone makes sense, but a gigabit switched net certainly doesn't make sense from anything I've read to date.
      You should try InClose designs removeable IDE drive bays if you need to move terabytes of data. SneakerNet still blows away any wired connection I can afford.

  112. Re:Is this ADDITIONAL fiber? Fiber since 1992 or s by glacial23 · · Score: 1

    The fiber started in 1989, before there was Category 5 UTP(or Cat 3, for that matter). The choice was fiber or thinwire. You decide :-)

    So now we're moving from the same switches that were put in in 1989(hubs, really) and the somewhat newer ATM stuff to all new gigabit goodness...

  113. 16,000 connections for 9,600 students by ptimmons · · Score: 1

    Wow... looks as though each student can have 1.67Gb/s if they divide up the bandwidth equally.

    And their connection is 1,000 times faster than my broadband? I thought my broadband was capable of 10Mb/s(?)

    1. Re:16,000 connections for 9,600 students by aes12 · · Score: 1

      Umm, Faculty offices, staff offices, Library computers..... Think about it. There is also a connection in every classroom. I'm surprised it's not higher than 16,000.

  114. This isn't unique by eclectric · · Score: 2

    Several uni's are upgrading their computer networks from 100 megabit to 1 gigabit. My university (IU) will be beginning the process soon, with a completion date in late 2003 or early 2004. That's 100,000 users, approximately. Granted, a good portion of those probably aren't on campus to enjoy that bandwidth, but I know *I* am :)

    I've heard of several other universities doing this as well. It just makes sense when it's time to replace wiring (or in our case, get two new Technology buildings that will hold all of our servers) to upgrade to the next level.

    I guess this is our "gee-whiz, college kids are lucky" post of the week. Just remember what we have to *pay* for this stuff :)

    1. Re:This isn't unique by zeuropa · · Score: 1

      I think that this is making the news because it will be the first one done. No one has attempted it before. And if, by some chance, something does go wrong, *your* school will still have time to back out.

  115. Woohoo, Go Case! by casespanza · · Score: 1

    I remember the good ol' days as a student. 155Mbit ATM to my desktop back in 1996! How many of you were playing with you 8-bit ISA Ethernet cards or Token Ring then?

    The one thing going for CWRU is they love to throw money at anything they can. Just take a tour of campus and ask how much all of the "artistic" sculptures cost?

    1. Re:Woohoo, Go Case! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Just take a tour of campus and ask how much all of the "artistic" sculptures cost?

      Not much; it was mostly donated.

  116. A few points to note by sinnergy · · Score: 5, Informative
    I've been reading a lot of the posts here and, likewise, have been posting a lot (in fact, more than I've posted in years). There's a lot of points I find that I keep making and figured I'd wrap them all up in one post to save me time. For the record, I am an employee of CWRU as well as a part-time graduate student. I work in the EECS department (Electrical Engineering and Computer Science) and am currently involved with the gigabit networking upgrades in my buildings to some degree.
    • The article isn't clear about the fiber networking here at CWRU. The fiber network has been in place largely since the late 1980s. This isn't a new installation. New buildings are getting both Cat5 and fiber, but most of the older buildings already have both single and multi mode fiber already installed. Cat5 wasn't even a standard until after the current fiber infrastructure was already in place!
    • Yes, the name of the school is Case Western Reserve University.
    • CWRU implemented an ATM network in 1995/1996 that failed miserably. I know because I was one of the first people on it. At the time, ATM was an unproven technology. Vendor support just wasn't there. Gigabit is less of a gamble because we know it works and has much better support and a much brighter future.
    • The article does not mention anything of the thousands upon thousands of wireless access points that will be installed as well. While 802.11 certainly does not provide anywhere near the performance of a wired connection, most laptop users will probably find the wireless network more useful in the long run
    • CWRU isn't the greatest school in the world, but I know that the many people, including myself, work tireless to try to make it better. There are many bitter people (and rightly so) out there who have had negative experiences with the school in the past. However, things have changed and are continuing to move in a very positive direction. I know because I'm living it.
    • Presti's is still open and they still sell delicious bakery.
    OK... enough ranting for now. I'm going to hop out of this discussion. If anyone has any serious questions, they can email me. I can't guarantee I'll know the answer, but I'll certainly try.
    1. Re:A few points to note by jstott · · Score: 1
      CWRU implemented an ATM network in 1995/1996 that failed miserably. I know because I was one of the first people on it. At the time, ATM was an unproven technology. Vendor support just wasn't there.

      Not to mention that INS (IT Dept to everyone else) stuck a firewall with 10MB/s network cards between the ATM network and the outside world. ATM to every machine on campus, and we were lucky to get 20kB/s to any computer off-campus. And then couldn't upgrade it for almost a year because there wasn't any money budgeted...

      -JS

      --
      Vanity of vanities, all is vanity...
    2. Re:A few points to note by sinnergy · · Score: 2

      You're right... but thankfully the former VP of IS quite a couple of years back. Things are improving slowly now that he has departed.

      Bye bye Uncle Neff.

  117. Yahoo most wired poll by McCart42 · · Score: 1

    For a brief (past 3 years or so) history of Case Reserve's IT career, check out the Yahoo Internet Life Most Wired polls. The year before I came to CWRU, we were the "most wired" campus in America, due to our 155 MBPS ATM network. Since then, we've failed to make the polls entirely. Apparently, some of the numbers were faked by our VP of IT, though I honestly can't figure out which ones (I'm not being sarcastic, I don't know).
    The old ATM network was great and fast when it worked, but it could get flaky at times. And there were the hours where it conked out entirely...I'm also told there was some lag. I am confident that by the time I get back to CWRU from my co-op, next spring, they'll have all the bugs worked out and gigabit Ethernet will be working well. Additionally, there will supposedly also be a campus wireless network, though details on that are more difficult to come by. I know they've already done the library and the dorms, I believe, and I think the entire campus will be wireless by the fall. But I haven't heard much since I left school for the summer.

    --
    "I may be quite wrong." - Socrates
  118. Of course no ports are open by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    But you get blazing speed.. just dont get to DO anything with it..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Of course no ports are open by [Dilbert] · · Score: 1

      actually, not at all true.

      CWRU's firewalling is VERY minimalist. We're allowed to do pretty much anything.

      Hell, over summer while we have very few students and very low internet connection usage, they even tolerate a bit of *cough* ftp service *cough*. There is a bigass trafficshaper in the main NOC that shapes down most of the useless P2P traffic. It's pointless anyway, because we have an on-campus LAN/samba search engine that will dig up nearly any mp3 you can ever want. We need the internet pipe free so the real ftp boxen can pull in the 0sec mp3s. ;p

      one of the things that i say over and over to people that are looking at cwru - our professors (faculty) suck ass, but the STAFF here rocks. People like sinnergy (hi Froggy) are what make going to school here bearable.

      I hate my classes, i hate my professors, and the social life here leaves a lot to be desired... but i've met and worked with what i consider to be some amazingly cool and smart people. that is what i will take with me when (if?) I leave CWRU. ("if" because I'd love to continue to work here for a while if there is a position. :)

      --
      From a motherboard manual, error beep codes: S-L-L-L-SS: Speaker Error
    2. Re:Of course no ports are open by McCart42 · · Score: 1

      Heh heh, I get the same feeling of never leaving CWRU, Braden...I may be here for 6 years if I finish out my co-op (2 terms) and BS/MS...

      But hey, more college is never a bad thing when you can get someone else to pay for it :)

      --
      "I may be quite wrong." - Socrates
    3. Re:Of course no ports are open by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really don't know why so many people hate the professors at Case. Is the CS department really that bad? I always figured it was more than adequate, however, I also attend class about 3 times a week and get more than sufficient grades. Maybe there really is a problem? It still feels as if I'm learning a great deal, just on my own. That's fine with me, learning a semester of a course the night before the final suits me better than attending an 8am lecture three times a week. At any rate, if I were to complain about CWRU it would be in respect to the students, not the professors. We are some of the most anti-social, sheltered, and arrogant students in the country. We need to lighten up, besides we're mostly all a bunch of MIT/CMU rejects anyway.

    4. Re:Of course no ports are open by stewby18 · · Score: 1
      We need to lighten up, besides we're mostly all a bunch of MIT/CMU rejects anyway.
      Not that you're bitter, of course.

      Just because you didn't get into your school of choice and can't make friends doesn't mean the rest of us hate it. You're welcome to transfer out at any time. I'm with the previous poster, who thinks that the Students are the real resource here. If you don't want to be a part of that, do us all a favor.

      Don't be.

    5. Re:Of course no ports are open by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you couldn't be any further from the truth on this one. I didn't apply to either of those schools in fact. I just hate hearing so many of my fellow students complain about how great of a student they were in high school and how high of an SAT score they got when they are studying 10 times as much and receive lower grades. As for the friends issue, that's also pretty inaccurate. It's more the CS department specifically that I can't tolerate. The remaining students at our school can actually be pretty normal. In fact I've met some great people, just not ones that share my academic interests. I guess it's because I'm not into Star Trek or Magic Cards.

    6. Re:Of course no ports are open by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's only the CS department you can't tolerate, you shouldn't have that much of a problem, given that they only make up, what, 10% of the students here...I would think you would have a bigger problem with the CS faculty than the students, though. I'm not going to tell you to stop complaining, but you make your own experience, and like it or not, if you want to be miserable, you're going to be miserable. Try not to drag the rest of us down with you.

  119. Oh dear I went there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lowest rates of happiness in the world I think. No wonder they need fat pipes for porn. We didn't even get the lake effect snow which usually went just east of us.

  120. Re:Is this ADDITIONAL fiber? Fiber since 1992 or s by Geek+In+Training · · Score: 2

    Slashdot ate my freaking post. Thanks, 404 error. (Maybe it was the router, the firewall, or one of the many switches. Oh well.)

    I wanted to say thanks to all of you who responded and confirmed my suspicions. I find it humorous (sad?) that all of the "Use it for pr0n!" and P2P karma-whores are sucking all of the modpoints, while those of us who are directly disproving the story submission's assertion that "Case Western is installing fiber connections in 16,000 computers..." are going unmodded.

    Not that *I* need the points, but maybe you CRWUbies could use them, eh?

    Hi, Froggy. :)

    -RT

    --
    SlashSigTheorem: Humorous, Political, Critical, Constructive- If you have a .sig, someone WILL complai
  121. Now if they only had a decent CS program.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'd think they'd spend some of thier huge computing budget making sure thier CS department doesn't lose it's accreditation again, as it did a few years ago.

    1. Re:Now if they only had a decent CS program.... by McCart42 · · Score: 1

      You know technically CWRU combined their EE and CS departments so as not to lose said accreditation...

      --
      "I may be quite wrong." - Socrates
  122. Environmental control security? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the CNN article: "From the podium the professor can control the lights, video projectors and sound system in the room, as well as surf the Internet and link to every other student computer. "

    I hope they have some good security on this, otherwise it will be disabled by November! :-)

    1. Re:Environmental control security? by McCart42 · · Score: 1

      They've already had some of this--I remember when a prank utilizing the moving chalkboards was to be pulled in the chemistry building...it never worked. I think what they have to be more worried about is the chairs in Rockefeller 301 and their probability of being turned backwards on a given morning...

      --
      "I may be quite wrong." - Socrates
    2. Re:Environmental control security? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was great, Singham never new what hit him.

    3. Re:Environmental control security? by McCart42 · · Score: 1

      Oh God, someone else remembers that great day...wonder if you've seen the video commemorating the prank...it should still be around on CWRUnet. The look on his face was PRICELESS. I still remember him laughing.

      --
      "I may be quite wrong." - Socrates
  123. Better Uses for $$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally, I think CWRU has better things to spend their money on...like profs who care about their students more than their research and an administration who is more concerned with students than research money and tuition. Having attended the school, I know that CWRU uses their network to lure students in after which they get a severe wake-up call. The network has major problems staying up and most students who attend wish they could transfer, but can't because their grades are so low or don't because the money CWRU gave them.

    CWRU as a school is not the best evironment and I personally know three or four people whom the university has ruined... all due to an incompetent administration. It's great to see an undergrad dean tell a student the reason their grades are so low is because they are "not smart enough" to attend the school despite that student scoring 1600 on his SATs. He had been screwed over by a few profs who failed to properly monitor their TAs and the resulting depression spiraled until he eventually failed out. That's just one story... another involves a student who was told that CWRU would refund the student's tuition if that student went in for surgery to remove a tumor. The student went in for surgery in the third week of class and wasn't able to go back to class and catch up. Guess who refused to refund the tuition despite the prior agreement? Then there is the case where a student took classes at another university during the summer after receiving approval from the dean of transfer credit stating that the classes would transfer over in full and the student would receive credit for the specific courses they took. That student took the classes at the other university and ended up wasting a couple grand because CWRU decided they no longer wanted to give that student credit for those classes when he returned to CWRU in the fall. There are many more, simply ask a student or graduate of the school.

    Anyway, I simply want to tell people to consider these stories before deciding to attend CWRU. If you do decide to attend, I highly recommend you get any agreements you make in writing as I have found CWRU to be more concerned with making money and a name than making good students and professionals.

    1. Re:Better Uses for $$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a recent Case Grad all I have to say is a-f**in-men.

    2. Re:Better Uses for $$ by zeuropa · · Score: 1

      The network wasn't what lured me in as a student. It was the fact that it was one of 5 universities in the entire US that fit what I was looking for in a school. I was waitlisted at one, got small scholarships from three others, and got a significant scholarship from CWRU. That's what brought me in. And I'm glad to be a student at CWRU rather than the other school I thought I wanted to go to when I was a senior in high school. Granted, I've had my problems. The registrar's office randomly decided to change the spelling of my name at one point last year. I had a hard time getting it changed back because I don't have ready access to a birth certificate. But I believe the environment is what you make it. I believed the same type of thing you do...until I got to know some people. I know that kind of thing happens from time to time, but if you're a disagreeable student, they aren't going to want to help you much. Getting things in writing, from what I've found, is a good thing to do no matter what company/business you're working with, and I don't see any reason for a University to be an exception anyway.

  124. Lots of fun uses! by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1
    I love the 100Mbit access I have in the labs at school. I can think of a bunch of things to use this for:
    • VNC sucks a lot a bandwidth if you like to run 1280x1024 @ 32bit.
    • VPNs (especilly for play Halo)
    • Fragging everyone else thanks to you riduclous ping time
    • Running a quake, sof, ut, etc. server
    • P2P
    • Getting the latest Redhat ISO's....I could break my current record of 20 min.
    • Serving your own website.
    • And best of all...
    • trying to get it slahdotted!
    --
    Life is too short to proofread.
    1. Re:Lots of fun uses! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm... as a fellow Case student I thought the true uses were:

      Divx Movies
      MP3s
      Warez
      Pr0n

      Am I wrong?

  125. CWRU network history by Greg+Lindahl · · Score: 2

    CWRU has a history of installing advanced networks for no particular reason, to sit mostly unused for years, until they install the next advanced network. They already pulled all that fiber a while ago, back when ATM was going to rule the universe.

    1. Re:CWRU network history by JFalcon25 · · Score: 1

      nope, fiber still there. ATM was a Neff idea, which turned out to be a bad decision.

    2. Re:CWRU network history by Greg+Lindahl · · Score: 2

      "pulled that fibre" means that they installed that fibre, not that they removed it.

  126. Re:Network speed and SETI ratings by dkh2 · · Score: 1

    Nice fantasy you've got going there.

    As anybody should be able to guess, network bandwidth has absolutely nothing to do with how fast an individual SETI@Home work unit can be processed.

    Now, if they were to start investing heavily in quad processor systems with gigs of ram you would have an argument.

    --
    My office has been taken over by iPod people.
  127. I use gigE at home, $38 NICs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GigE is great for file transfers between my machines (ie backups) and moves data as fast as disks allow. Going from 100 to 1G was like the 10 to 100 step. You will like it. Intel's new desktop MT card is cheap (and looks cheap!). Switches are still expensive, so I use direct connections for now. PCI bus performance on nearly every x86 chipset falls short of theoretical - gigE and HDTV will bring that to light and get it fixed. Naturally, I hope the Western students will create streaming HDTV content. Bootlegging other's work is lame, create your own, new work!

  128. Must have read the DOOM3 requirements by Graemee · · Score: 1

    Some one must have asked John what it requires for multiplayer.

  129. Pricy, Laptop-Hostile by billstewart · · Score: 2
    There are starting to be a lot of copper gig-e cards out there; I've seen them as cheap as $59 at Fry's. By contrast, the Netgear GA621 is $249, though the school probably gets some huge volume discount.

    Jandar0's other article mentioned that there's an adapter for 100Mbps service for people who can't use gig-e fiber cards (Mac users, etc.), which is probably good enough for laptops (otherwise, if you've got a roommate with a desk-top, use their PC as a bridge or something...) That shouldn't be too bad for performance - you'll be limited to 100Mbps, but the performance should be better since the backbone has more bandwidth for everybody, so you should still get decent file-server performance, and Gnutella won't be bandwidth-limited...

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  130. before you all sign up for CWRU... by Da_Monk · · Score: 2

    it is worth noting that the school is changing its aim to appeal to more "average" students, some professors in the comp sci department don't know how to use ping (true story), and the food service is getting to the point of lethal. oh and the stress is really sucky.

  131. Re:Network speed and SETI ratings by cloudmaster · · Score: 2

    There'd be less latency between transmitting completed work units and getting new ones with a fast network. Unless the transfers happen while calculations are begin performed, of course, which would take a little bit of processor time away to handle the network communications, in which case less time spent transferring data would probably still be a minute benefit. :)

    So "absolutely nothing to do with" is just barely an overstatement.

  132. computing research is done... by Da_Monk · · Score: 2

    some of us put the ATM technology available to us to good use a few years ago. see the results here. The CWRU Beowulf Project was mankind's last best hope for Bromberg's numerical Integration Approximation Theorem...

  133. Re:Already Done by McCart42 · · Score: 1

    It's not so much the fiber that's a big deal as it is the "gigabit ethernet" part. CWRU had fiberoptic for awhile as well, but it was running 155 MBPS ATM switches (and ATM never took off as it was supposed to). What are the backbone switches at George Washington?

    --
    "I may be quite wrong." - Socrates
  134. Lossless compression works fine by billstewart · · Score: 2
    Of course we'll start yelling about compression :-) Lossless compression algorithms have been around for a long time - they don't usually save as much space as lossy algorithms, but they keep all your data. The simpler algorithms (Huffman codes, Lempel-Ziv variations, and all the things that zip and gzip formats use) aren't tuned for images, but I found that they gave me 3:1 compression on satellite images, and much higher compression on images that were mostly black space. And the decompression is fast enough that it's almost always a win to burn the compression time - sometimes the savings in transmission time alone makes it worthwhile.

    I don't know if anybody's done 2-dimensional lossless coding, or how well it works, but it shouldn't be hard - do line-by-line differences and then compress those, if you want something crude.
    You can also find lossless music coders - "Shorten" used by etree.org gets compression ratios of 2-3, which is a lot bigger than MP3s but keeps the audiophiles happy.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  135. LOSSLESS COMPRESSION!!!!. by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 0

    Well.. I've already yelled what I had to....

  136. Using 200Mbps is easy... by billstewart · · Score: 2

    Maybe most users can't use a full gbps of data. Most of them *can* use more than 100mbps, so even if they only double their bandwidth, it's still nice, and there's plenty of room for growth. Obviously things like file servers can benefit from the faster connections more directly, since they're often transmitting to many recipients at once, so they'll probably get beefed up early.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  137. Re:Is this ADDITIONAL fiber? Fiber since 1992 or s by regen · · Score: 2

    I went to CWRU when the initially installed the fiber on campus. All on campus housing, and academic building had fiber installed in 1988. The off campus frat houses (there are two types of frat houses at CWRU southside on campus and northside off campus) got fiber a few years later.

  138. Speed will be limited by internet pipe that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they connect the 1 gigabit optic cable to. Connecting a three inch hose to a 1 inch main isn't going to get your more water in less time.

    1. Re:Speed will be limited by internet pipe that by McCart42 · · Score: 1

      Do your homework. We have an OC-3 type pipe to the outside internet, though I don't even think the intended value of GigE was for outside internet sites--the purpose is for oncampus connections and connections to other Internet 2 universities. Just read above a little bit for further explanation, as it's already been said.

      --
      "I may be quite wrong." - Socrates
  139. Gigawho? by Staniel · · Score: 1

    I thought most computers couldn't even support gigabit ethernet. Personally, I'd rather have wireless everywhere at my school. It probably wouldn't cost $27 million either.

    1. Re:Gigawho? by zeuropa · · Score: 1

      Wireless everywhere is in the works as well.

  140. Wireless security by billstewart · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If CWRU is installing the wireless, they'll have at least some semblence of security on it. If universities are hunting down rogue wireless, for reasons other than just clueless control-freakness, it's because they're (legitimately) concerned about uncontrolled access as a security risk. Of course, security problems are much different for academia than for businesses - here in the business world, the classic security threat is some college kid hacking into your network. But if you're *running* a university network, all those threats are already *inside* your firewall - and they're your customers....

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Wireless security by macdaddy · · Score: 2

      Yep, that's right. They're already inside you campus firewall. That's why you never trust the local wire. We're rebuilding our network over the next year and I'mm taking a lot of things into account to make it more secure. The ISP I consult for will also get some improvments. You can never be too paranoid. :)

    2. Re:Wireless security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah actually the wireless network is being treated as a separate network and they connect through a Cisco 3000 VPN with the dialin users for access to the rest of the network.

  141. Free, Unlimited Bandwidth by Proudrooster · · Score: 1

    What's the point you ask?

    Simple, once these "kids" graduate or leave for other reasons, they will be drunk on the cup of "Free Unlimited" Bandwidth and will have expectation that providers e.g. (ISP's, Cable Companies) provide them with the same level of performance, they had back at college at a "cheap price".

    Recently, I took a training class with some of the University of Michigan Network Admins and they were talking about filtering and quoting bandwidth because in the explosion of usage. I explained to them that the solution was to give the students all they could use, so when they leave UofM and head out to the real world, they EXPECT and DEMAND BANDWIDTH. The pathetic amount of bandwidth meagerly doled out by the phone companies is pathetic. The current rate for a T1 is $800 for a measly 1.5MegaBIT, ( yes BIT as opposed to BYTE ). We need higher expectations which will push low cost bandwidth solutions!

    Setting expectations is what life is all about and college is a great place to teach it.

    Cheap, Unlimited, Bandwidth to the masses NOW!

  142. VOIP is low bandwidth - needs prioritization by billstewart · · Score: 2

    Typically, 64kbps raw voice gets compressed to 16kbps or 8kbps, then wrapped in several layers of RTP and IP overhead that bring it back up to around 12-24kbps. Won't make a dent in your shared 10Mbps Ether, much less Gig-E-to-the desktop. The problem is that it's latency-sensitive, and getting stuck behind big ftp transfers can be a problem - and it's unlikely that a high-powered switching network will be able to prioritize it. On the other hand, utilization will probably be low enough that there won't be much jitter - the real problem becomes connecting the PBX to the outside world.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  143. Why Case Sucks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really don't know why so many people hate the professors at Case. Is the CS department really that bad? I always figured it was more than adequate, however, I also attend class about 3 times a week and get more than sufficient grades. Maybe there really is a problem? It still feels as if I'm learning a great deal, just on my own. That's fine with me, learning a semester of a course the night before the final suits me better than attending an 8am lecture three times a week. At any rate, if I were to complain about CWRU it would be in respect to the students, not the professors. We are some of the most anti-social, sheltered, and arrogant students in the country. We need to lighten up, besides we're mostly all a bunch of MIT/CMU rejects anyway. Maybe we just need some attractive girls finally. Perhaps the $27 million could have been used to attract some normal students?

    1. Re:Why Case Sucks? by McCart42 · · Score: 1

      Not all of us were "rejects". I suspect that a lot of CWRU students got accepted to other schools but couldn't pay their high tuition. CWRU's scholarships are very competitive. However if they keep ramping up tuition at these rates, they're going to become just as expensive as peer institutions in the University Athletic Association, and that is when students are going to start expecting more.

      --
      "I may be quite wrong." - Socrates
  144. I love academia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It's so removed from the real world.

    To wit:

    Administrators aren't sure what anybody needs that kind of bandwidth for yet, but they are curious to see how it gets used.

    I wonder how many of my tax dollars are directly or indirectly going to be used to find out that a bunch of college students with lots of bandwidth will d/l porn, play games, d/l porn, swap MP3s, d/l porn, and maybe d/l some porn in their boutiful spare time.

  145. I go to Case... by Jax83 · · Score: 1

    and believe me, one word: PORN. If you went there, you'd understand.

    1. Re:I go to Case... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I go to case, and can't say I understand completely. To my knowledge there really isn't that much porn on the network besides "DARTH-SCSI". Maybe I just don't spend enough time focusing on the network porn. I guess it's understandable that so many people are into it though with our lack of a social life. It's a shame that you have to join the greek system to attend any real parties or come to any contact with members of the opposite sex (besides porn).

    2. Re:I go to Case... by JFalcon25 · · Score: 1

      LOL! Downloading divx, vcd, svcd movies is competing with porn nowadays. Darth-Scsi is still alive (last time I visited case), but his stuff is getting quite old. heh.

    3. Re:I go to Case... by JFalcon25 · · Score: 1

      and a shame when people go to parties just to get drunk and wasted, seeing them puke, then helping them get back to their bed in the res halls. instead of enjoying a 3-hour party, sitting in front of a toilet after 20 minutes of chugging liquor and beer. seen that several times. sigh.

    4. Re:I go to Case... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey I've only puked a few dozen times. Just kidding. I see your point there, but you don't have to blatantly abuse alcohol to be sociable. Perhaps I'm one of the few proponents of moderation. I guess I've had to help puking people quite a few times as well. Hopefully they'll learn as they get older, as most of them are freshmen it seems.

    5. Re:I go to Case... by JFalcon25 · · Score: 1

      Definitely true. Wish we could tell those drunks to use moderation more often. People can still have a good time having fun and drinking responsibly. And yup, freshmen are usually the victims in the beginning, then they begin to learn as they become sophs, juniors, then seniors. Of course, some still do get wasted by graduation, heh.

    6. Re:I go to Case... by zeuropa · · Score: 1
      It's a shame that you have to join the greek system to attend any real parties or come to any contact with members of the opposite sex (besides porn).
      But you don't. I was considering going greek... then I found an awesome group of friends. We have social lives, within our group. I think the people that think you have to go greek to have a social life just haven't found the right friends yet.
  146. porn by Mechasplifford · · Score: 1

    more bandwidth for porn warez and mp3s

    --
    http://www.disassociate.com
  147. Re:Yahoo most wired poll - Neff Lied!!! by JFalcon25 · · Score: 1

    When Yahoo! Most Wired announced that CWRU was #1, the University was thrilled by it. Of course, people had to wonder how we got #1. Some of the answers placed by our former IT VP were indeed questionable, and the result lead to CWRU disappearing from the Most Wired poll the following year. It was not a surprise that shortly after Neff resigned. Some of us believed that if he didn't resign, Auston would have fired him.

  148. Think high-speed interconnect on par w. system bus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting


    1 Gbps is comparable in speed to the internal system buses -- it's 125 MegaBYTES per second!

    In effect, you can now think of all the computing resources on the LAN (CPU, disks, memory, etc.) as being interconnected with a fast system bus comparable in speed to PCI. 10 PCs connected with GigE don't look much different than a multiprocessor with 10 CPUs, do they? And that's with off-the-shelf PCs that were built with today's assumptions that network bandwidth is limited. As bandwidth becomes more plentiful, those assumptions will change, and PCs will add hardware and software support for all sorts of cool stuff...

    There are still a lot of unsolved problems in this area, of course, which is why it's so cool to throw these problems at a university full of smart students.

    Some that I can think of from the top of my mind are:

    o storage connectivity: in a traditional PC, your hard drive tends to be local, because you need
    several megaBYTEs/second read/write bandwidth. Well, with GigE, you now have enough bandwidth to write to a disk connected to the network. This stuff is still in its infancy.

    Do a Google search for "iSCSI" -- SCSI over IP.

    o multiprocessors: Someone mentioned Beowulf clusters, which I can see as a first step to getting some parallel computing going. But there are still bottlenecks, like the software overhead of transferring the data around, computing TCP checksums, etc. etc. Think how cool it would be if you could just access a remote machine's memory like you can local memory. You need special hardware support to take away some of the overhead. This stuff is also still in its infancy.

    Do a Google search on "RDMA" (Remote DMA).

    o Someone asked "why GigE to the edge?"

    One reason why networking companies are pushing GigE all the way to the end hosts is so that the network elements (switches, routers, etc.) don't have to buffer bursts of traffic when you're doing speed conversion from a 1GigE uplink to a 10/100 Mbps end host. If a burst of packets arrives at the edge switch from the GigE uplink, they'll have to be buffered for some time while they "trickle" to the endstation. If the link to the end station is also 1 Gbps, then the packets can be transmitted as quickly as they arrive (assuming that the link is not oversubscribed).

    Why do you want to avoid buffering in the network?

    Buffers in switches and routers are MEGA-expensive, because they have to be REALLY fast. We're talking memory bandwidths of 8 Gigabytes/second on a non-blocking 32 Gigabit/second switch fabric. That stuff is really hard to build, and even harder to build cheap enough that anyone can afford it.

    Buffering introduces delay (latency).

    o Also, keep in mind that modern switches can apply QoS mechanisms like policing to limit the amount of bandwidth that a given host can consume, so the fact that your "pipe" can "do" 1Gbps doesn't mean that you'll be able to get that much traffic into/out of the network. Depending on the switch, administrators can configure how much bandwidth you get pretty finely.

  149. P2PreCrimes Unit by delcielo · · Score: 2

    It's the P2PreCrimes unit of the RIAA.

    They're using a small cadre of hip teens suspended in fluid to determine the likelihood of a particular piece of music being stolen.

    --
    Hot Damn! It's the Soggy Bottom Boys!
  150. Talk about spoiled by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 2
    I realized that I was a bit spoiled when (5 years ago), I realized that my ADSL downloads were running faster than my floppy disk loads. Now these people are getting fiber uplinks faster than their hard disks.

    I think that it's time to pool all of your hard disks into a RAID enclosure and set up your boxes to boot over the network. (of course you'll probably have to dump Windows to do that -- but I wouldn't really mind... :-)

    --
    Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    1. Re:Talk about spoiled by Cramer · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can netboot windows. An "nfsroot" windows is a different story.

    2. Re:Talk about spoiled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Actually, gigabit ethernet has higher bandwidth than the PCI bus, which is amusing considering that we're getting gigabit PCI cards.

  151. Gigabit? by Fascist+Christ · · Score: 1

    What will I do with my gigabit ethernet card when school is out?

    --
    TodayTM BillyJoelTM GoogleTMd for StitchTMes due to WindowsTM while RollerbladeTMing with an AppleTM and a PopsicleTM
    1. Re:Gigabit? by McCart42 · · Score: 1

      Return it, just like I'm going to do with my ATM card. They give it to you for free and you return it when you leave. Pretty simple.

      --
      "I may be quite wrong." - Socrates
    2. Re:Gigabit? by zeuropa · · Score: 1

      Actually, new students will have to come in with their own gigE cards...and take them with when they leave.

  152. I wonder how they'll screw it up this time... by jstott · · Score: 1
    16,000 CWRU Computers Getting Gigabit Ethernet

    My prediction: Marketing 1, Implementation 0.

    This is, after all, the school that upgraded their entire campus to ATM (back when ATM was first available), arranged for an nice fast connection to the outside world (100MB, which was a big pipe at the time), and the stuck a firewall with two 10MB ethernet cards between the two. This went on for a good year...

    -JS (former CWRU graduate student)

    --
    Vanity of vanities, all is vanity...
  153. Legit college uses by taernim · · Score: 1

    I am very envious of the students there. I went to USC -- no, not Southern Cali... the other one.

    We had such a horrifying network, it was really sad. Since I worked in a group in the CS Dept, all my friends and roommates would yell at me whenever the network went down. And did it go down... Ugh. Literally 2-5 times a week.

    Unfortunately, it was not just the School Internet connection that went down, either. We lost connectivity even on our own network many times.

    Since I was working on an Astronomy project at the time, I was working with data files that were over 500 MB a piece. I was not allowed to use the network to transmit. Get that... It would be "Wasting too much" bandwidth to use it that way, heh. So I would have killed for Gigabit connectivity.

    On an unrelated side-note, I remember when the CS dept blocked Napster... and didn't tell anyone. Man, the papers went nuts when students complained. Then we had to backtrack and say it was a mistake of when the new proxies were installed. Heh.

    --
    "PC Load Letter? What the $@#% does that mean?!"
  154. Probably helps Admins by youngec · · Score: 1

    Gigabit on the desktop is probably helping workstation and network admins more than anyone. When you think about it, 100Mb/s is a huge bottleneck for today's hard drives. We live in the day of commonplace ATA100/133 hard drive transfer rates. 12.5MB/s (equivalent to 100Mb/s) just doesn't cut it when it comes to doing major OS and application service packs, or unattended OS installs (take the 1 gigabyte Windows XP install, for example). Even with gigabit ethernet (equiv. to 125MB/s), there is still a bottleneck with today's fastest ATA133 IDE drives and Ultra160/320 SCSI drives. Thank goodness the 10-gigabit standard was recently approved.

  155. Streaming TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this becomes more widespread, maybe we can finally get streaming TV - subscribe to the channels you want instead of swallowing some pre-approved corporate lineup, choose the movie you want from HBO's menu instead of sitting through six repeats of Lethal Weapon 4...

  156. Re:Yahoo most wired poll - Neff Lied!!! by McCart42 · · Score: 1

    What exactly did he lie about, is my question. Before looking at Yahoo's take on it, I looked at our statistics for the year we were #1--nothing really surprised me except perhaps the support availability, which to me is not so massive an issue that it causes a university to go from #1 in the nation to off the polls...

    --
    "I may be quite wrong." - Socrates
  157. Re:Network speed and SETI ratings by Krazy_in_Normal · · Score: 0

    CM, I agree, in theory, *but* my penis is 12" long, and I have never run out of laser toner. Surely this proves it!?

  158. Re:Not sure how its going to be used ? by KlomDark · · Score: 2

    What, they have computers in Rolla? They don't even have a real bar there. It's either Applebees or drive out to that shitty-ass redneck bar "Z's place" by Doolittle. What a fucking joke of a village...

    Go get ticks at Merrimac Springs, or what? Go see the roadside psychic along I44? Muahahaha. :)

    At least when I was there a couple weeks ago (Visiting a cute DJ chick from KDAA :) ) there was a fair, and fireworks, and I won a Mustang! :)

    (No, didn't win the damn mustang, some fucker from California won it...)

    Gotta get the DJ chick to move in with me in Omaha, Rolla is a hella-boring shithole.

  159. REAL P2P Computing - FINALLY!!! by LegallySuthernRed · · Score: 1

    Checkout Today's Business section of the SAN JOSE MERCURY NEWS (7/22/02) Which Certainly does NOT use the Headline (Paraphrased) "... We're not quite sure what we'll do with it..." :-\

    Try the comments relating to Research Science folks. Read re. Steve Corbato of the National Consortium, INTERNET2's comments. www.internet2.edu

    OBVIOUS FOLKS - Do you REALLY think anyone would spend $27 Mil just to see what one could do with it? Get real... ;~p

  160. Case invented the FreeNet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my earliest internet experience was on the Cleveland FreeNet (the first of it's kind in the world, as far as i've heard) around 1986, sporting my new 1200 baud modem on my Atari 130xe. the freenet was a research project at case that just totally took off so they licensed the code to other universities and cities.

    i remember connecting with a local call to the cleveland freenet in 1987, connecting with telnet to a freenet in stockholm, and browsing books at the swedish national library. i ran downstairs and tried to explain to my mom that i was browsing the books in sweden and she freaked out and made me hang up the call for fear of huge long distance bills! it took me several arguments to explain to her that the call was local and all the travelling was being done on the network, free of charge!!

    great years, and all made possible by the geeks at case (one of which i married!).

    btw - it's called case western reserve university because it was a merging of the case school of business and the western reserve university. and for those of you familiar with your US history, the midwestern area of Ohio, Indiana, Michigan, etc. was called the Western Reserve back when it was purchased to extend the colonies.

  161. not fair! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    hmm I feel ripped off! my school, Rutgers, is spending 100 million dollars for the 2 fiber lines and we are only getting 622Mbps.

    http://runet2000.rutgers.edu/home.html
    RUNet provides:

    higher reliability of network service due to innovative advances in networking technologies

    production quality networking for students, faculty, and staff to more effectively use their computers and the Internet

    more capacity and ability to provide higher quality differentiated services

    higher bandwidth from the current Ethernet backbone at 10 Mbps to a Sonet (Synchronous Optical Network) backbone at 622 Mbps

    increased responsiveness for adds, moves, and changes of computer equipment for students, faculty, and staff

    built-in redundancy to more effectively deal with network outages or congestion issues
  162. Re: SSN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The funny thing is that there is only one reason a school should ever need your social security number: if you are receiving government financial aid. And even then it should be limited to the financial aid department.

    Most schools will allow you to get a student ID that doesn't include your SSN, if you ask, threaten, and lean on them long enough. Just fyi.

  163. Re: Shorten by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FLAC gets better compression than Shorten -- read their FAQ.

  164. Been there, Done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate to destroy all your thoughts about colleges, but Gigabit enet isn't anything amazing, as one person stated, there'll be a huge bottleneck at the top. And regardless, at my .edu, this is all old hat -- wireless all over the place, VoIP (I haven't had a phone bill in about 2 years now).

    Not to mention that we already are transferring *FULL* dvd movies. Yes, some of us actually have dvd burners now-a-days. And full CDs? Are you kidding? I've been transferring those between friends for years now.

  165. 16,000 kick ass counter-strike servers by yulek · · Score: 1

    see subject

    --
    in this age of communication i'm just not getting through
  166. FDDI by TheDefunctMunky · · Score: 1

    I just bought a Cisco Catalyst 2822-EN on eBay for $125 and when it arrived, it had a FDDI Fiber DAS module in it with 2 Fiber ports and a DIN passthrough port on it. I can't imagine that the module could cost that much money if i got that and a switch for $125

  167. Gigabit ethernet is a joke by Denium · · Score: 1
    Gigabit ethernet is a kludge -- the 1500-octet MTU was great back when 10mbits/sec was fast; it scales horribly.

    In practice, gig ether (even over fiber) achieves only 400 to 600 megabits/sec. SCL tested some of the first gigE cards and got terrible performance. Their cluster cookbook is rather dated, but compares some of the popular interconnects (Myrinet, Fast Ethernet, and FDDI).

    Few cards that I have seen support jumbo frames; even then, I've only seen cards that go up to 9000-octet frames. Face it: Ethernet doesn't scale well past 100mbits/sec.

  168. movies by SwingGeek · · Score: 1

    As a student who lived in a dorm last year, I saw lots of file sharing going on (p2p, that is).

    The thing that got shared more than any other(surpassing even porn) is movies. Regular action, drama, comedy.

    I'm guessing this is because women enjoy mainstream movies, whereas the majority of women aren't interested in porn.

  169. Oh good! by Marvel+Man · · Score: 0

    Higher tuition costs. Can't wait.

  170. Re:Yahoo most wired poll - Neff Lied!!! by JFalcon25 · · Score: 1

    Here's the Observer article back in 1999:

    On April 20, 1999, Undergraduate Student Government (USG) passed a bill calling for an investigation into the results of the Yahoo! Internet Life survey that ranked CWRU as the "most wired" university in the country. The bill urged the university to "investigate the truthfulness of the responses to the survey that resulted in CWRU's number one ranking" as a result of an April 16, 1999 issue of The Observer that "pointed out questionable statistics about CWRU's computing facilities and services that were reported in the survey," the bill read.

    You might say that Neff bended the facts of the Wired survey. Listing that 90% of public computers available 24 hours a day does not note the fact that we only have a limited number of machines available in Smith Lab, PDELC, and the Weatherhead Lab. Also, students being guranteed 25 MB of web space (this was before home.cwru.edu) off the server was not totally true. Student groups were able to request web space but not individual students. Several other entries were also called questionable just because student groups and staff didn't believe it was true.

    When the 2001 survey came out, CWRU was not even listed. Whether CWRU chose not to submit an entry to Yahoo! or Yahoo! itself felt that the questionable answers given in last year's poll warrant its removal is up to those conspiracy theorists.

  171. oh boy... by jreames · · Score: 1

    And i thought Morgan State university was going to have problems with inappropriate usage of network resources that increased operating costs!

    [we are moving to pure-fabric 6513 cores, pure-fabric 6509 distribution in the academic buildings, 6509 distribution in the dorms, (all of the above native IOS) and 4006/3500xl access layer... gige from access to dist, gige back to dual cores from every academic building, a couple of pixen 535 to handle firewalling, etc.]

    After migrating most of the academic/administrative buildings, the cores have et to offer any indication of traffic on the load graphs...

    why does anyone need gig to the desk everywhere? and what are they aggregating it back to the distribution/core with ? (i smell MASSIVE oversubscription) (like i can talk about that :P) and can forsee a raesonable number of people cooperating to DOS the core or strategic servers (just because they can). Am I alone in this foresight?

  172. Re:Already Done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's nice.

    The fiber at CWRU was installed 1990-ish. When I started in 1994, the fiber actually plugged into Cabletron cards specifically made for CWRU with fiber ports on the back.