Slashdot Mirror


User: Gutboy

Gutboy's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
155
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 155

  1. Re:I Hope MMOs All Die on The Future of MMOs · · Score: 1

    Try Eve-Online, it's the closest I can think of to what you want (still has quests from NPCs, but you don't ever have to do them).

  2. Re:I Dont Get It... on Lawmakers Debate Patent Immunity For Banks · · Score: 1

    In 96'-97' I worked for the Georgia Department of Corrections, and what we did was scan documents so they could be transmitted between various Corrections departments. We also created 'signatures' so that the scanned documents would be legal documents.

    Sounds a lot like what they are doing, except applied to the banking industry. Sounds obvious to me, based on our prior work.

  3. Re:Oh the Humanity! on 'Porn King' Says Google Should Block Porn Access · · Score: 1

    First you say:
    ... I only ask that you not swear or talk about sex in front of my child ...

    But your tag line says:
    It should be illegal to say that freedom of speech should be limited.

    So please report you jail, since you are trying to limit my freedom of speech.

  4. Re:Large Byte Checksums. on Install Copyright Filters on PCs, Says RIAA Boss · · Score: 1

    To defeat your scheme, I put an entry in my hosts table to direct any queries to the "checksum" verifier to one of my own machines, that always replies with a "thumbs up".

  5. Re:Oregon on Dutch Unveil Robot Gas Station Attendant · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I still live in Oregon, and have (off and on) for 17+ years. A long time ago, there was a ballot measure to allow anyone to pump their own gas, with the idea that it would make for cheaper gas. It was defeated by people running advertisements that said, basically, 'do you want to have gas on your hands before you go eat food?' I guess being 'back to nature' means people here haven't learned how to bathe (and if you head downtown, you'll see lots of examples).

  6. Re:So, anyone else with me? on RIAA Wants Songwriter Royalty Lowered · · Score: 1

    You make the same mistake that I see lots of people making, assuming that the RIAA only controls current music. Older music is controled by them also.

  7. Re:simple on Programmer's Language-Aware Spell Checker? · · Score: 1

    What are you looking at while you are coding? Intellisense would have quit displaying anything as soon as you made your 'mistake', thus you'd know there was something wrong. "Hunting around for anywhere up to a minute" just makes it seem like you are either copying someone elses code (since you aren't looking at the screen) or have no idea how your IDE tool works.

  8. Re:Maturity = Mess on Any "Pretty" Code Out There? · · Score: 1
    And on a related note - why rewrite? Can't people ever just go for cleaning something up?

    Back in my Air Force days, I was asked to make some modifications to some code that had been writen 5-6 years before, consisting of some 10-20 thousand lines of code. The author if this code had decided that it was a good idea to have 50 flag variables, named "Flag01", "Flag02", "Flag03", etc., and 20 'switch' variables, named (you guessed it) "Switch01", "Switch02", etc.

    This wonderful piece of code was filled with things like:

    if (Switch05 == 7) Flag14 = 8;
    if (Switch18 == 3) Flag07 = 0;
    ...

    I rewrote the code, and didn't use a single variable named 'Flag' or 'Switch'! Was it faster? Who cares, it was maintainable, which made my job easier since I had to maintain it.
  9. Re:Nah on Are 80 Columns Enough? · · Score: 1

    You need to read Code Complete, you have your good/bad completly backwards (Chapter 18.4 for those with first edition).

  10. GPL 3.0 does *not* prevent these types of deals on Xandros CEO Doesn�t Agree Linux is Patent Violator · · Score: 3, Informative

    From the article: "Indeed, the Free Software Foundation is rewriting its GNU General Public License (GPL) 3.0 to prohibit such patent deals in the future." GLP 3.0 does no such thing. What it does is extend any such patent protection deals to all users of the GPL 3.0 software, not just the group that made the deal.

  11. Re:The judges are flat out wrong on Deleting Files is a Crime? · · Score: 1

    You left out: All work product generated by you for your employer. They did pay for it, after all.

  12. Re:Being that Chinese people are smart and all... on First Hand Look At Chinese Internet Censorship · · Score: 1

    Considering how the authorities act in China, would you run around telling everyone that you had a way through the filter?

  13. Re:Interesting indeed on A Thoughtful Look at Indian Outsourcing · · Score: 1

    work during the day

    But that's just the point, there is no day job, since it got outsourced to India.

  14. Re:Interesting indeed on A Thoughtful Look at Indian Outsourcing · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Great, I'll just go back to school for 3-4 more years. My family can just starve, and live in the carboard box out back.

  15. Re:Most reports miss the market on Why iPod Mini is a smart move for Apple · · Score: 0

    You know teen age girls with $1250 to spend on luxury items? Are their moms divorced/widowed?

  16. Re:Another batch? Yes! on Joel Rants About Resumes · · Score: 1

    If you're sending out 100+ resumes a day THAT YOU'RE QUALIFIED FOR, then you should have NO trouble finding a job, determination or not.
    Pure bullshit. Along with your 100+ resumes, are the resumes of 200+ other people. If you aren't in the first 10 to submit, you might as well go home.

  17. Re:That's Capitalism. on Games Workshop Tries to Crack Down on Internet Sales · · Score: 1

    They aren't cutting you off, as GW will still be selling stuff online, just no one else can sell their products online.

  18. Re:The Big Problem on Developing Online Games · · Score: 1

    I'd say it wasn't a success. It removed stuff (creatures, items) from the game, making the world a duller place. Another indication that it wasn't a success is that it's been 2 years since this happened, and there hasn't been anything like it again.

    Now, the EQ world has been changing, and the players can take roles in the change, but don't really determine the outcome (Evil Overlord will get powerfull magic item and enslave population). While it can be fun to be involved in these events, you still have the knowledge that succeed or fail, predetermined things will happen.

    Of course, there are better ways to handle these things, and maybe the people at SOE need to reconsider what they are doing. But they have the most successful MMORPG, so they must be doing something right.

  19. Re:The Big Problem on Developing Online Games · · Score: 1

    There was a dragon, who was very powerful, and insane. It took the might of all the other dragons to stop him, and put him to 'sleep' in a tomb. This tomb was guarded by 4 dragons, called warders. As long as 1 of the warders was alive, the sleeper (as he was called) would not awake.

    In come the merry band of adventurers, 40-60 players, who kill all 4 of the warders. The sleeper awakes, kills everyone (yeah sleeper!), has revenge on a few dragons, then goes off to challenge the 'God Dragon'.

    ---

    Ok, there's the story. Now, in a MMORPG like EverQuest, when you kill something, after a period of time, it will respawn, or return to life. Also, things you kill have treasures on them, in the form of weapons or equipment. The 4 warders had nice equipment on them. For a long time, people would kill 3 of the warders, but not the 4th, so that others (and they themselves) could continue to get the treasures from the warders.

    Eventually, some group killed all the warders, freeing the sleeper. After the sleeper was freed, the warders never 'respawned'. They had made a change to the world, making it a world in which the sleeper was awake. But now those treasures that the warders had are no longer available to anyone else (along with some other changes). Now, the people who had already received the items from the warders were not upset, those that had not (the overwelming majority of players) will never have the chance to get them.

  20. Re:The Big Problem on Developing Online Games · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Give us a storyline that we actually run into! Not just something that'll unfold as news updates every month.

    EverQuest tried a small sample of letting the players change the world. Ok, so those 40-60 people went and changed the world. The 20,000+ other people then bitched that the world has been changed, and they didn't get to do it.

  21. Re:Reactor on The World's Largest Scavenger Hunt · · Score: 1

    A breeder reactor produces plutonium.

    Actually, it produces fuel. Plutonium is just one form a fuel that can be produced. It is the most common one since we have a large suply of U-238 laying around, not doing anything useful. Technically, if it isn't producing a fuel you can use to continue your reaction, it really isn't a breeder reactor.

  22. Re:breeder reactors aren't *that* hard to build... on The World's Largest Scavenger Hunt · · Score: 1

    so it's a nuclear reactor

    Never said it wasn't a nuclear reactor, said it wasn't a breeder reactor. Breeder reactor produces more fuel than it uses. Producing some isotopes that are used in a breeder reactor doesn't mean you've built a breeder reactor.

  23. Re:breeder reactors aren't *that* hard to build... on The World's Largest Scavenger Hunt · · Score: 1

    From the article itself: "I know that some of the reactions that go on in a breeder reactor went on to a minute extent."

    This is not the same as building a breeder reactor.

  24. Re:Reactor on The World's Largest Scavenger Hunt · · Score: 2, Informative

    Several universities have uranium used for physics, chemistry, and nuclear engineering purposes. When I went to school, we could obtain samples for use (I majored in Nuclear Engineering). Get weapons grade plutonium was a different matter.

  25. Reactor on The World's Largest Scavenger Hunt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    when students built a working breeder reactor.

    According to the article, they build a "working nuclear reactor", an fairly easy task if you know how, not a "working breeder reactor", a very complicated task requiring multi-million dollar processing plants and weapons grade plutonium.