Slashdot Mirror


User: imac.usr

imac.usr's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
340
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 340

  1. Re:48 times dupe... on Lingering Questions On the Extent of the Adobe Hack · · Score: 1
  2. Re:It's too bad on How Apple Killed the Linux Desktop · · Score: 1

    Although I presume it's too late to change your mind, you should know that you can in fact enable focus-follows-mounse at least for Terminal windows, with an app like TinkerTool. Hope it makes the last few months more tolerable at least. :P

  3. Re:Draw a rectangle, on Apple Transitions Hardware Leadership · · Score: 1
  4. Re:Why is this moderated down? on Anti-Education Attack Poisons 150 Afghan Schoolgirls · · Score: 1

    Okay, if I contort myself, I can sort of rationalize everything on that list, except kite-flying. Seriously, who could possibly be against that?

  5. Re:Um on Ask Slashdot: Techie Wedding Invitation Ideas? · · Score: 1

    The only concern I would have with the mini-CD idea is that they tend not to play well with slot-loading drives, such as those in many laptops.

  6. Re:Is it working for Google? on Half Life of a Tech Worker: 15 Years · · Score: 1

    The omission of Chrome is rather interesting.

    To play devil's advocate for a moment, isn't Chrome built on top of WebKit?

  7. Re:Yikes on Paper On Super Flu Strain May Be Banned From Publication · · Score: 1

    I don't know, I feel like that's an arms race you just can't win.

  8. Re:Everyone does it on Bank of America Buying Abusive Domain Names · · Score: 5, Funny

    > bankofamericaspies.com

    How *are* Bank of America's pies, anyway?

  9. Hey TalkTalk! It's My Life! on UK ISP TalkTalk Caught Monitoring Its Customers · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't you forget!

    Really, this story is Such A Shame.

  10. Re:I'll be your John Wayne on House Overwhelmingly Passes Cybersecurity Bill · · Score: 1

    What have you got against Doritos?

  11. Re:No gratitude? on Alan Cox Quits As Linux TTY Maintainer — "I've Had Enough" · · Score: 1


    You don't seem that arrogant to me. Guess that means you were wrong then. And it didn't even take a day! :P

  12. New Solaris bit-by-bit licensing terms on Oracle Buys Sun · · Score: 5, Funny

    1s - free
    0s - $10 per 0, minimum 100,000 0s

  13. Handbrake! on Decent DVD-Ripping Solution For Linux? · · Score: 4, Informative

    Live it, learn it, love it.
    http://handbrake.fr/

  14. Re:Simple fix. (With disclaimer) on New Dell Laptops Give Users a Literal Shock · · Score: 1

    Please. The odds of that working are about the same as being able to see through a metal wall or talk into my Mac Plus's mouse.

  15. Re:Microsoft update + Public Network = Instant DOS on Marriott IT Exec Shares Network Horror Story · · Score: 2, Insightful
    What kind of fucking idiot updates their laptop during a conference? You wait to do that shit until you get back home in case it screws your machine.

  16. Re:Full credit for trying something different... on Barenaked USB Drive · · Score: 1
    "By the way, these guys produce good music. They are worthy of support."

    Maybe by your low, shitty standard.

    Wow, Kevin Federline reads Slashdot?

  17. HP + ? = oy. on HP to Install Netscape on all new PCs · · Score: 1
    Mmm-hmm. HP's most recent partnership was with Apple. How'd that work out for them?

    Jeebus. Just bring back the calculators and VMS, already.

  18. Re:In other news.... on Alternative Browsers Impede Investigations · · Score: 1
    Police, baffled by the lack of a blue "e" can't figure out how they used the Internet.

    In that case, they're only safe if they did a clean-install...

  19. Why code signing sucks. on Do You Code Sign? · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I recently installed Fedora Core 4, and after setting it all up I ran up2date and noted that it's set to require GPG signatures by default (I imported the key as well). Upon running up2date, though, practically every package it found brought up an error message stating that it couldn't recognize the signature, and asking if I wanted to install the package anyway. After about ten packages, I said "fuck it" and turned off GPG signing. (I had to do so by editing up2date's config file manually, since it only runs through its config process once, it seems.)

    If Red Hat can't be bothered to sign any of its updates (even the kernel, for pete's sake), then why as a user should I care one way or another?

  20. Re:Why does it always have to be either-or? on Is It Wrong to Love Microsoft? · · Score: 1
    (for the record, I'm aware that my .sig sort of contradicts my viewpoint above. What can I say, I picked it in '99 and just never updated it.)

  21. Why does it always have to be either-or? on Is It Wrong to Love Microsoft? · · Score: 1
    Right. Reading the article, it's pretty clear that it's either a really clever troll, or written by someone for whom English is a passing fancy.

    At any rate, I've been a Mac user since 1989, but in that time I've also used Windows and on occasion, Linux or other Unix-based systems. (I grew up the son of a DEC engineer, so I'm one of those rare Mac users that actually wanted a command-line in the old Mac OS. Userland Frontier forever!) Over time, I've come to realize that every OS has its strengths and weaknesses. I'm still most comfortable using a Mac, but that doesn't mean I don't get a kick out of some things in Windows, or even Linux --- although Linux still lags behind the others in terms of being usable right out of the box, IMO. The point is, I'm comfortable with leveraging the strengths of each platform to overcome the weaknesses of another, and as a result, I feel like I can provide better "service" to my employer, my friends looking for answers to questions, or just to my own sense of discovery.

    Is there no more room for the multi-platform technologist, or does everything have to be segmented off into yet another "if you are not with us, you are against us" box? Isn't there enough of that already in the real world without fucking up technology as well?

  22. Re:Revenge of the Spelling Nazi and Grammar Troll on Hackers, Spelling, and Grammar? · · Score: 1
    Haha, and I've been writing it "pete's" for years. This is why I try not to criticize other people's writing. :D (Seriously, I'm grateful you pointed it out.)

    And for the record, I know "makes its own gravy" is the correct version; my comment was that due to the common mixing of "its"/"it's," it sometimes seems wrong to see the correct form because I'm seeing the incorrect form more and more....

  23. Re:Revenge of the Spelling Nazi and Grammar Troll on Hackers, Spelling, and Grammar? · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I've said it before, but it's not the diction that matters, but the message. Good grammer is only helpful to get a message across. I'm not writing a fucking paper, it's an response in a damn forum.

    Eh, I don't know. I tend to consider the diction an integral part of the message, myself; if there are glaringly obvious errors in basic structure, spelling, or diction, and I don't know the person well enough in any other way, it's going to impact the message for me. It's just the way I roll.

    My father, a successful engineer with DEC for 15+ years, is a notoriously bad speller, to the point where I sometimes have to phonetically read his letters. (Make of that what you will in regards to my comments above. :P) The fact that I know he's intelligent and a good communicator of ideas mitigates his lack of polish grammatically in my eyes. If one of his co-workers wrote to me in such a style, though, I'd wonder how he made it out of college.

    I try very hard not to be a jerk about grammar or spelling, learning to roll with the punches. I've almost gotten to the point where I consider a phrase like "makes its own gravy" to be written wrong because of the missing apostrophe, because it's so common -- even in advertising copy, for pete's sake.

    I sometimes wonder if I'm one of the last generations (I'm 34) who will have any solid grounding in grammar, spelling, and basic English constructs for the future.

  24. Re:Link to the actual product site on Sun Announces Its First Laptop · · Score: 1
    Am I the only one amused by the fact that the product page URL includes the word "desktop"?

  25. Re:Live, with a webcam? on Fun With Transparent Screen Backgrounds · · Score: 1
    It seems like the hack only takes images out of the screensaver and onto the desktop but not the screensaver itself, so no animation.

    No, you actually can run the screensaver engine itself in the background. The original poster probably meant to link to this hint instead.