This isn't true as I understand it. An author can't do anything to prevent his heirs from relicensing his work. An author may also use his 35-year termination right to relicense a work.
If you can't be arsed to read them then use Ubuntu (or wait for the next version of Debian); Apt 0.6 makes sure that the packages you install come from a trusted place.
If you sorted all the files by hand it would be manual.
Just because you must do a bit of typing does not mean that the process is any more 'manual' than adding new conditions to a list of rules in a GUI.
Your computer with Winfs isn't going to read your mind and predict that you want to see all of the lighthouse pictures you've taken from floria that don't have 16:9 aspect ratio.
You obviously didn't try very hard. The Ubuntu installer allows you to resize an NTFS partition. I did it yesterday--shrank an NTFS partition from 60 to 40 gigs, freeing up 20 gigs for Ubuntu.
The specs for Flash are not open. They are not available if you want to use them to create a competing implementation of a flash player.
The rest of your post leaves me scratching my head and wondering, WTF? You appear to live in some kind of alternate CRAZY universe where graphics card manufacturers make their web sites available only in flash, where flash is "essential" if one ever want to surf the web, and where web sites are somehow able to prevent one from downloading their content, though not "viewing" it, as if there HTTP features a distinction between the two actions.
"Pursuant to the terms and conditions of this License, you are granted a nonexclusive license to use the Specification for the sole purposes of developing Products that output SWF."
Those working on GPLFlash and others may not use the documentation.
"In my brain it always (raises the question as to|makes me wonder) whether the person heard the phrase used properly and is now repeating it in the improper way, or if they're just using the phrase because they think it sounds smart, in which case they sound twice as silly."
Slashdot Mirror
... use the correct term: transclusion.
cdbaby has a useful genre/category/mood browser.
apt-get install nscd
This isn't true as I understand it. An author can't do anything to prevent his heirs from relicensing his work. An author may also use his 35-year termination right to relicense a work.
I expect it's in the release notes.
If you can't be arsed to read them then use Ubuntu (or wait for the next version of Debian); Apt 0.6 makes sure that the packages you install come from a trusted place.
Fear not, consumer! It is only a matter of time before your outmoded laws are harmonised with those of America.
for file in *.zip; do unzip "$file"; done
How is old Mac, and how are his boxes?
What about using 'find' is 'manual'?
If you sorted all the files by hand it would be manual.
Just because you must do a bit of typing does not mean that the process is any more 'manual' than adding new conditions to a list of rules in a GUI.
Your computer with Winfs isn't going to read your mind and predict that you want to see all of the lighthouse pictures you've taken from floria that don't have 16:9 aspect ratio.
Better than what?
You asked the question as if you thought such a task were impossible without WinFS. I merely proved you wrong.
If the command line isn't your thing then use f-spot or iPhoto or whatever.
You obviously didn't try very hard. The Ubuntu installer allows you to resize an NTFS partition. I did it yesterday--shrank an NTFS partition from 60 to 40 gigs, freeing up 20 gigs for Ubuntu.
find ~/Photos -name '*florida*'
find ~/Photos -name '*lighthouse*' -and -not -name '*16:9*'
Not really sure what you want to do with the second one, but I'll try:
find ~/Photos -name '*camille*' -exec cp {} ~/montage \;
If the command line isn't your thing then you can always use F-Spot or iPhoto.
Your last one could be:
find -gname administrator -exec file {} \; | grep blah
or if you like MIME types:
find -gname administrator -exec file --mime {} \; | grep application/x-blah
The specs for Flash are not open. They are not available if you want to use them to create a competing implementation of a flash player.
The rest of your post leaves me scratching my head and wondering, WTF? You appear to live in some kind of alternate CRAZY universe where graphics card manufacturers make their web sites available only in flash, where flash is "essential" if one ever want to surf the web, and where web sites are somehow able to prevent one from downloading their content, though not "viewing" it, as if there HTTP features a distinction between the two actions.
Ah, I see now. The Back button is only used by a small number of developers and power users?
> How many thousands of years have people lived off what the earth grows?
We can not support 6.5 billion people using traditional faming methods. By 2020 we will have to support 8 billion...
You should have used my packages of VMWare. :p
One can also use the Spivak pronouns if one doesn't want to come off as sounding like a bit of a toff. :)
Did you report your reproducable problem to their bug tracking system?
They can't call it "OpenOffice" because the name is already taken by another project.
Goodbye, happines... hello, BIOS...