int c = 0; for (int i=n; i>0; i--) { sprintf(buf, "%d", i); if (X[strdup(buf)]) c++; }
Yay memory leaks! Why is he using C strings for the compare? std::string is surely faster because it already knows length. I think a lot of implementations have a specialized hash_map for string also.
That's because it uses CAV (Constant Angular Velocity) while burning, which makes it start at a low speed (4x) in the center and work up to a higher speed (16x) as it nears the edges.
Because of Microsoft's pure dominance and Mono-based XAML plugins for Mozilla, it will be able to reach a lot more people than anything Moz/Opera could come up with.
There really isn't a point in creating yet another standard. Working on getting a single one to work across everything would be a big boon to everybody, but it seems Moz/Opera are both sick of following in IE's wake.
It's called Freenet, which has already gone under fire because pedos have realized it also.
After a long wait, and a lot of luck, freenet *might* run for you, and take up all your CPU while it's at it. But at least it's a step toward stopping government censorship.
Installing via service pack and integrated install has worked fine for me, and I haven't had to report any bugs since the couple betas.
My experience with it lately has been great. The popup and activex blockers in IE are a godsend. The firewall is painless, aside from the initial "do you want to allow this?" messages when opening a 3d game for the first time (blank screen for ~10sec in some of them).
I'd love to have an AMD64 cpu to test the NX support, it sounds like a great addition.
Bloated? yes. However the interface is better than WMP9. At least they are making an effort.
Flashing stuff? I have no flashing stuff. Where do I get this? What is wrong the the buttons? They are spaced out nicely and have easy to read text.
There are large play, stop, fast forward, rewind, mute, and volume buttons at the bottom left corner, and are blatantly obvious. If you can't find them, OPEN YOUR FUCKING EYES.
It might very well be that the only way to live in a country that doesn't have a repressive "intellectual property" institution designed around the needs of barristers would be to start a geeks-only nation and outlaw lawyers and lawyer-like behaviour via Constitutional edict...
It may not be a country but the internet paired with open source is pretty much as close as you'll ever get to a "geeks-only" nation.
I'dathunk that the "processor bottleneck" was just a myth.
It doesn't really matter for non-gamers. My dad runs an XP2000+ and is able to browse the web/play mp3s without a problem. But for gamers it really matters: current games are almost completely CPU limited. Until some games come out that seriously stress the video hardware with shaders, all the new video cards can do for you is increase resolution and AA/AF. With a recent system you should get around the same FPS in UT2004 and FarCry until you hit high resolutions and AA/AF settings that stress fillrate. Physics, AI, and just generally pushing lots of geometry through AGP is a big frame limiter.
After looking it seems the only differences from the Roomba is ultrasonic sight instead of bumpers, and a price tag an order of magnitude higher (Roomba == $160, Trilobite 2.0 == $1800).
I guess the sonic thing is a more geekish way to go about things, but is it really more effective than bumpers? Is it worth the massive price tag?
Build an office suite with a file based database with a GUI and then you can start to attack the MS Access component of MS Office. Until then, you're replicating Star-Office and OpenOffice for some reason (and then trying to sell it for $149 USD on top of that).
If one was going to make such a thing, SQLite would be a good starting point. It has some flaws that need ironing but it is much faster than Access and is under public domain.
Slashdot Mirror
FreeCache only works on the one file you link to. So, even if it did cache files less than 5MB, you wouldn't get any of the pictures.
The key development of the cloak, however, was the development of a new material called retro-reflectum.
Anyone else think "retro-reflectum" sounds like some harry potter spell?
I guess we won't be seeing any of this then?
a piece of laptop sized wood is probably more helpful, though not "cool" to be seen with.
Oh come on that's just waiting to be exploited!
That's because it uses CAV (Constant Angular Velocity) while burning, which makes it start at a low speed (4x) in the center and work up to a higher speed (16x) as it nears the edges.
IAAGP (graphics programmer). I know those effects are cool, I just meant that nowadays using shaders for shadows and motion blur isn't anything new.
One of the demos they go over in the article is the Animusic demo for ATI's Radeon 9700.
That was one of the cooler demos I've seen. The graphics aren't that special but paired with the sound the scene comes alive.
Exactly.
Because of Microsoft's pure dominance and Mono-based XAML plugins for Mozilla, it will be able to reach a lot more people than anything Moz/Opera could come up with.
There really isn't a point in creating yet another standard. Working on getting a single one to work across everything would be a big boon to everybody, but it seems Moz/Opera are both sick of following in IE's wake.
It's called Freenet, which has already gone under fire because pedos have realized it also.
After a long wait, and a lot of luck, freenet *might* run for you, and take up all your CPU while it's at it. But at least it's a step toward stopping government censorship.
yes, this IS slashdot. 80% of it's users are linux zealots, and 90% of them are in windows ;)
Installing via service pack and integrated install has worked fine for me, and I haven't had to report any bugs since the couple betas.
My experience with it lately has been great. The popup and activex blockers in IE are a godsend. The firewall is painless, aside from the initial "do you want to allow this?" messages when opening a 3d game for the first time (blank screen for ~10sec in some of them).
I'd love to have an AMD64 cpu to test the NX support, it sounds like a great addition.
Umm, if it collects on your puter and monitor, it was already there. Just now it's in one place for easier cleaning.
Bloated? yes. However the interface is better than WMP9. At least they are making an effort.
Flashing stuff? I have no flashing stuff. Where do I get this? What is wrong the the buttons? They are spaced out nicely and have easy to read text.
There are large play, stop, fast forward, rewind, mute, and volume buttons at the bottom left corner, and are blatantly obvious. If you can't find them, OPEN YOUR FUCKING EYES.
It might very well be that the only way to live in a country that doesn't have a repressive "intellectual property" institution designed around the needs of barristers would be to start a geeks-only nation and outlaw lawyers and lawyer-like behaviour via Constitutional edict...
It may not be a country but the internet paired with open source is pretty much as close as you'll ever get to a "geeks-only" nation.
Relationship advice from a wanker, is this serious? :P
I'dathunk that the "processor bottleneck" was just a myth.
It doesn't really matter for non-gamers. My dad runs an XP2000+ and is able to browse the web/play mp3s without a problem. But for gamers it really matters: current games are almost completely CPU limited. Until some games come out that seriously stress the video hardware with shaders, all the new video cards can do for you is increase resolution and AA/AF. With a recent system you should get around the same FPS in UT2004 and FarCry until you hit high resolutions and AA/AF settings that stress fillrate. Physics, AI, and just generally pushing lots of geometry through AGP is a big frame limiter.
Well, I guess this means no more banging your girlfriend in the back seats. Then again, nobody here should have to worry about that.
"Tin-foiled hat". Bah. Try being this guy.
Well, this is in the dictionary:
;)
robot, n: a mechanism that can move automatically.
So I guess there is no line
After looking it seems the only differences from the Roomba is ultrasonic sight instead of bumpers, and a price tag an order of magnitude higher (Roomba == $160, Trilobite 2.0 == $1800).
I guess the sonic thing is a more geekish way to go about things, but is it really more effective than bumpers? Is it worth the massive price tag?
Why TeamSpeak? UT2004 has its own voice support.
Build an office suite with a file based database with a GUI and then you can start to attack the MS Access component of MS Office. Until then, you're replicating Star-Office and OpenOffice for some reason (and then trying to sell it for $149 USD on top of that).
If one was going to make such a thing, SQLite would be a good starting point. It has some flaws that need ironing but it is much faster than Access and is under public domain.
Please direct me to this manual of yours. I would like to grow my funds by $180 million also.