Slashdot Mirror


User: maxwell+demon

maxwell+demon's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
12,279
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 12,279

  1. Re:Interestingly enough... on Amazon EBS Failure Brings Down Reddit, Imgur, Others · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hey, confirming is Netcraft's job!

  2. Re:Well, do it, but... on Ask Slashdot: Securing a Windows Laptop, For the Windows Newbie? · · Score: 1

    An how is this acceptable in comparison to the Windows experience?

    Apart from the fact that under Windows I'd be wary to unblock even the wanted Flash stuff? I don't have all those Firefox add-ons installed because of Flash performance. I have those add-ons installed for privacy and security (and against sites which get unbearable because of excessive ads). I just speculated on the reason why you see Flash getting stuck and I don't. It just never happened to me, and I never felt the need to examine closely why it works flawless.

  3. Re:Welcome to America, Land of the Free!!! on Internet Providers To Begin Warning Customers Who Pirate Content · · Score: 1

    Well, the point is that freedom has been redefined. Formerly, it was defined as freedom of the people. Today it's defined as freedom of the market.

  4. Re:Well, do it, but... on Ask Slashdot: Securing a Windows Laptop, For the Windows Newbie? · · Score: 1

    While I can say the same, flash on linux is not as good s some people want it... For example it bugs me that sometimes it gets stuck for half a second or so. It's no wonder that some people labels it as unaccceptable.

    That's interesting. It never happened to me. Maybe it's some advertiser's Flash using up the player's resources? I use AdBlock Plus, RequestPolicy and NoScript, so there's nothing running on Flash but the stuff I explicitly want to have.

  5. Re:Well, do it, but... on Ask Slashdot: Securing a Windows Laptop, For the Windows Newbie? · · Score: 1

    Call me when Linux has proper flash support.

    I've never had an issue with Flash on Linux.

  6. Re:Well, do it, but... on Ask Slashdot: Securing a Windows Laptop, For the Windows Newbie? · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Any it doesn't matter if the child looks at porn.

    Maybe. But then do it from a Linux computer. There are obviously plenty of them available in that household. There's no need to allow it from the Windows computer which is the one most likely infected by malware from those porn sites.

  7. Re:How do I spot a genius? on How Do You Spot a Genius? · · Score: 1, Funny

    Pro-tip: If you have a genius following you, throw down a couple rubics cubes. The three minutes you gain will allow you to duck into a crowd where you can hide.
    Also a poorly edited textbook works in a pinch, but it's much heavier so you'll end up with fewer of them.

    Obligatory xkcd

  8. Re:I think we're at the peak of the empire. on The Long Reach of US Extradition · · Score: 1

    The problem is that the next empire will likely be Chinese.

  9. Re:JEWS... that's why on The Long Reach of US Extradition · · Score: 1

    Actually the Anonymous Cowards are responsible for it.

  10. Re:possible solution on FTC Offers $50,000 For Best Way To Stop Robocalls · · Score: 1

    Well, just return to the old system where people connected the phones. Except that now the operators first chat a few minutes with the callers. Only if you can convince the operator that you are a human, he will connect you.

  11. Re:Or on Free Online Education Unwelcome In Minnesota · · Score: 3, Funny

    GeoIP location is absolute shit. I live in Riverside California, GeoIP says I'm in Nevada.

    No, GeoIP location is perfectly accurate. If GeoIP says you are in Nevada, you obviously are in Nevada, and you only believe you were in Riverside California. Probably because someone wants you to believe it, for whatever evil plan, and they made the illusion almost perfect, but they forgot the GeoIP which is the only hint you have about your real loc... wait, why are there black heli&$%@

    NO CARRIER

  12. Re:Democratic society without religion? on Ask Richard Dawkins About Evolution, Religion, and Science Education · · Score: 1

    I once proposed here that not having sex is a pretty good way to stay clear of HIV and was immediately bashed as a religious zealot.

    That's interesting, because few religions propose having no sex at all (except possibly for specific groups like monks/nuns and priests). Indeed, I expect any religion completely banning sex to not be long-term successful because the followers don't have children. That's evolution at work!

  13. Re:Widespread religion on Ask Richard Dawkins About Evolution, Religion, and Science Education · · Score: 1

    Ask someone who actually knows.

    You mean, like Richard Dawkins?

  14. Re:Widespread religion on Ask Richard Dawkins About Evolution, Religion, and Science Education · · Score: 1

    we're looking for _rational_ answers.

    Couldn't you at least settle for algebraic answers?

  15. Re:Widespread religion on Ask Richard Dawkins About Evolution, Religion, and Science Education · · Score: 1

    Because of the laws of thermodynamics.

    The laws of thermodynamics don't hold for the universe as a whole. Not even energy conservation. Gravitating systems don't even reach a thermal equilibrium if they are too large and/or to cold (the current universe is certainly dominated by gravitation, and quite large and cold). Note also that black holes get hotter as they radiate energy away!

  16. Re:Phyto-Plankton Produce Oxygen? on Huge Geoengineering Project Violates UN Rules · · Score: 2

    They produce oxygen as long as they are alive and near the surface. They sink to the deep waters after they died, and even if they still lived they would have a hard time to produce oxygen down in the darkness of the deep sea.

  17. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong? on Huge Geoengineering Project Violates UN Rules · · Score: 1

    A global carbon certificate market crash. :-)

  18. Re:Two to three mistakes in half a sebtence on Is a Wireless Data Center Possible? · · Score: 1

    "Team" means a group of individuals joining the efforts in order to achieve a goal otherwise unreachable by each single person.

    No. "Team" means a group of individuals working together. Not more, not less. They usually do so to achieve a goal, but that's not part of the definition. And it's definitely no given that a single member of the team couldn't achieve the goal.

  19. Re:wireless is like the old layer 1 hubs on Is a Wireless Data Center Possible? · · Score: 2

    I buy apple equipment at home, not cheap stuff.

    Maybe that's your problem. <gd&r>

  20. Re:90% Power Savings??? on Is a Wireless Data Center Possible? · · Score: 5, Funny

    1999 called...

    Oh my god! Did you warn them?

  21. Re:Just wait . . . on Is a Wireless Data Center Possible? · · Score: 1

    Indeed, you have to do the opposite: Turn all radios on all the time, so that they can consume all those evil radio waves before they reach you. :-)

  22. Re:Good luck with that. on Is a Wireless Data Center Possible? · · Score: 2

    60 mHz means about 1 cycle every 16.7 seconds.

  23. Re:Dubius claims on Is a Wireless Data Center Possible? · · Score: 5, Funny

    They obviously mean computing power. Because the networking is so bad that all processes are blocked on I/O most of the time. :-)

  24. Re:Muslims, America, Christianity on Thousands of Muslims Protest 'Age of Mockery' At Google's London Headquarters · · Score: 1

    Yeah, and the Crusades had nothing to do with Christianity ... nor did witch hunts ... and of course those people who considered it a good idea to kill abotion doctors were no true Christians while certainly the minority of rioting Muslims are representative of all Muslims.

    Ah, and yes, Americans value freedom of ideas ... unless the idea is in any way useful, then it is called "intellectual property" and is heavily restricted. Oh, and try to test your freedom by showing condoms on TV ...

  25. Re:Stupid questions on A Supercomputer On the Moon To Direct Deep Space Traffic · · Score: 1

    Why do you need a "supercomputer" to "process" and relay signals?

    That's because the real reason is that they want to build a big torrent server there, disguised as astronomical communications server. It has to be on the moon because that's outside the reach of the RIAA. ;-)

    How are "processed" signals going to get to earth from a station on the dark side of the moon without a line of sight back to earth?

    Maybe using a satellite orbiting the moon?