Of course. Thatis why is is important during human development that the infant has huge cognitive constraints (e.g. low working memory) in language learning; it limits the number of possible pairings of label and meaning. Of course, constraints can also be an impediment.
Past frequency does not tell us much about future frequency when the context changes. For example, if a terrorist group has a nuke, will previous frequency data still apply?
I agree.
You know the main reason there is over-medication of the poor is probably the rate that poor clinics see people. 5-10 minutes with a doctor results in the easiest solution.
Yeah, the credibility will be gone, as the public turn on their TVs, start their cars, play with the internet, put on their deoderant, enjoy their heart medicine...effing scientists..
Slashdot Mirror
Are you against opensource then?
Hows it working these days anyway..might be willing to leave google
I hate to break it to you, but you are quite incorrect.
Of course. Thatis why is is important during human development that the infant has huge cognitive constraints (e.g. low working memory) in language learning; it limits the number of possible pairings of label and meaning. Of course, constraints can also be an impediment.
as Popeye once quipped, "This Greek looks Chinese to me."
Also, there is the hormone contamination that is changing us to be more feminine. Coincidence?
How about these problems are real, and it is due to environmental pollution (endocrine disruptors, pesticides, etc). Discuss.
Well damn I didnt see the comment below me. Sorry for redundancy. Please don't moderate down.
BTW, Google knowing energy usage patterns is WAY to INTRUSIVE for my tastes.
One problem: Then you would have both car deaths and nuke deaths. Not one or the other.
Past frequency does not predict future frequency if the causal context changes. How can this be denied?
The fact is that contexts do change. Some weapons are extremely dangerous, and disruptive.
It is always easier to destroy than to protect.
The accusations against me and my intelligence are unfounded.
I am not an alarmist. I try to be rather pragmatic.
Past frequency does not tell us much about future frequency when the context changes. For example, if a terrorist group has a nuke, will previous frequency data still apply?
I think not.
I agree. You know the main reason there is over-medication of the poor is probably the rate that poor clinics see people. 5-10 minutes with a doctor results in the easiest solution.
Perfect information on citizens should only belong to a perfect government. When you see one, let me know and Ill install the camera.
Im so tired of the ivory tower bull.
By kids, you mean your friends? Right? jk
Yeah, the credibility will be gone, as the public turn on their TVs, start their cars, play with the internet, put on their deoderant, enjoy their heart medicine...effing scientists..
To be fair, that link wasn't present when he made that comment. They changed the summary.
No comment.
Yeah good question. I suspect that they might have tricked him by a process of implicit motor learning.
Well, I was hoping it was going to make up for that last neuroanatomy exam.
Deli Sliced brain though.. yeah definitely for Zombies.
Each slice is fixed in gelatin. Remarkably, it doesnt get damaged as the slice gets crumpled up.
Probably the best one of these I've seen.