THIS is not a matter for bandying of definitions and discriminations between definitions.
This is about POWER.
THE MOST IMPORTANT thing is that mass tracking of citizens by the government weakens the power of its citizenry over their OWN government. That simple.
Really, its that simple. p-o-w-e-r. Who's gonna keep it? you, or them?
Peer Review? It preliminary research was published in a peer reviewed journal. I found it in PubMed and gave it a read. I didn't understand much though, but on first glance it looks legit...as far as it goes. I mean, the results are promising but preliminary.
Slashdot Mirror
Yeah who here is sick and tired of crates being everywhere in games. I hardly ever see crates in my day to day.
After seeing her picture, I realize that NBC is dumber than I thought. Then again.. they hired her.
mod up funny
Increased IQ increased Ugly increased persistent virginity.
idiot. Don't you see how Bush would use such power? Do you think citizens should allow that kind of power to be held over them? Idiot.
BRilliant.
mod parent up. Very concise.
Interesting point. However, as of yet, the private credit reporting agency doesn't have a police force to arrest citizens, just sell products.
don't you mean off topic? I was replying to the parent's sig.
This is about POWER.
THE MOST IMPORTANT thing is that mass tracking of citizens by the government weakens the power of its citizenry over their OWN government. That simple.
Really, its that simple. p-o-w-e-r. Who's gonna keep it? you, or them?
Interesting. MOd parent up
NO Prob. :) Have a nice one.
I'm sure glad there is some Woodland pride to compete with all this Davis pride just South. Nice website.
NO. The key converts it from Mandarin to English, a translator if you will. The data isn't "recovered"... its all there, but in a different language.
Science does not prove things. Science rejected a null hypothesis, and accepted a alternative hypothesis with a certain statistical margin of error.
I'm busying myself reading the actual research journal article, and forwarding it to my laboratory colleagues.
It looks interesting. Sorry I can't post the journal article text.. copyright blah blah
Vallabha, GK, & McClelland, JL. (2007). Success and failure of new speech category learning in adulthood: consequences of learned Hebbian attractors in topographic maps. Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 7(1), 53-73.
So the better question is: Is fulfilling Moore's Law impeding the production of cheap laptops?
I just don't buy this story, or several of the other stories today.Slashdot HAS REALLY SUCKED TODAY
Be* is better than Ba*, any day. Beatles, Beethoven, Beer..
I told you, using dead babies is not the way to go. Adult stem cells, skin cells; those are the ways to go.
Peer Review? It preliminary research was published in a peer reviewed journal. I found it in PubMed and gave it a read. I didn't understand much though, but on first glance it looks legit...as far as it goes. I mean, the results are promising but preliminary.
That is why you should sit at the wing if you have flight sickness. Center of Gravity.
Hello World!!!
I don't think he is kidding, and it is probably gonna happen big time.
Heretic! Ha! Information wants to be free!