Slashdot Mirror


Ticket Tracking and Customer Management?

An anonymous reader writes "Like many Slashdot readers, I'm sure, I run a small side business doing IT consulting in addition to my day job. I'm looking for a good open-source ticket tracking system that I can run under Linux, preferably one that also has some customer management features. I'd like to be able to maintain a separate record for each job, along with time tracking, work logs, and information about the customer. Much of what I see on Sourceforge is, as usual, pre-pre-pre-alpha with no actual code. Does anyone have any suggestions for a project that might fit my needs?"

236 comments

  1. JIRA... by Forbman · · Score: 2, Informative

    at least, that's what Merrill Lynch uses.

    1. Re:JIRA... by flowsnake · · Score: 4, Informative

      JIRA is nice, but I'm not sure it satisfies the poster's open source requirements. AFAIK, the source code is only available to 'commercial users' http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/docs/v2.6.1 /building.html which I assume requires a paid-for commercial licence http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/pricing.jsp . I guess it depends on one's definition of 'open source' as to whether this is sufficiently open.

    2. Re:JIRA... by Artega+VH · · Score: 2, Informative

      JIRA isn't open source although it is quite nice and I use it internally at my workplace.

      I might suggest Trac. It's an open source ticket management system integrated with Subversion. Probably doesn't have the extensive customer management features but with the wiki+ticketing is done quite well and can no doubt be used to satisfy the posters needs.

      --
      groklaw, wired and slashdot. The holy trinity of work based time wasting.
    3. Re:JIRA... by arivanov · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is more for internal issue tracking and software development issue tracking. At least this is the way I have seen it used.

      If you want to use something for external facing issue tracking and make it customer facing straight away I would suggest RT by Best Practical. It is GPL and relatively open as far as brain effort to extend it is concerned. It is also trivial to use for issue oriented CRM/sales which is typical of a service company or consultancy.

      It is used as the primary system for tracking customer facing issues by companies with turnover in the billions like NTT/Verio. It is also used by small non-IT companies like my favourite plumbing supply shop http://www.plumbworld.co.uk/. It is also often adapted to integrate the support, CRM and sales process like in Claranet http://www.claranet.co.uk/. Judging by the people on its mailing list it is also running in pilots and internal projects at Audi, BT and a couple of other places.

      It has been in stable for nearly 4-5 years now. I have used in my previous job, and while it is not completely free of bugs, it is possibly the best general purpose issue tracking system I have seen so far.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    4. Re:JIRA... by Henk+Koster+jr · · Score: 1

      There are so many tools, packages, plugins and programs for this... To answer the question correctly one should know whether OP is looking for plugins for only tracking, or does he want complete platforms containing all the development-stuff? I would suggest in no particular order: Trac, Subversion, Mylyn, BIRT, Eclipse (EMF), Bugzilla and of course J-Unit for testing :-)

      --
      -- bye, HP
    5. Re:JIRA... by monthos · · Score: 1

      We use it at my company, which is a smaller cellular network to track and document outages and customer complaints as it passes through the multiple departmental blame. I would recommend it though I'm not sure if it meets the sub's criteria. Its got a whole lot of features we don't use at least :)

  2. JIRA is not open source by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

    but it does look pretty good.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:JIRA is not open source by SenorFluffyPants · · Score: 1

      It is open source, just not free. It is definitely intended for software projects, but we have adapted it here for general use, and it has been extremely well-received. It is also fairly inexpensive, and easily customizable. And no, I am not on the Atlassian payroll (the makers of JIRA), but rather a very satisfied customer. We have a commercial license, and it costs about $2500/year. Their Wiki product (Confluence) is also excellent.

  3. RT by oskard · · Score: 2, Informative

    Been using RT as a ticket tracker at a few places I've worked at. Works well.

    --
    Sigs are for Terrorists.
    1. Re:RT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      MIT over here uses RT to manage all IT-related tasks too. It seems to work well.

    2. Re:RT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps it was the way it was setup, but I once spent a very painful few months going back and fixing up mistakes this software made in my time sheet. For some reason it would replicate the latest changes backwards over previous entries. ie I fixed an issue for xyz on monday, and then another one on wednesday, it would go back and put the issue from wednesday as the issue on monday.

      Very painful.

      Next job I moved to a custom written MS Access solution.. head and shoulders above RT.

    3. Re:RT by zeath · · Score: 4, Interesting

      When researching a ticket tracking system to implement at my workplace I came with no experience in any non-proprietary system. I compared RT and trac side-by-side and found trac to be much more readable and user-friendly. Even for me, when setting it up, I spent an entire day trying to make heads or tails of the RT interface, while in a day I already had trac up and running and I was showing others how to log in and use it. Now that it is in production, what surprises me the most is the ease with which the non-IT department managers use it for tracking their tickets and project progress.

      The irony of the situation is that I do specialize in Perl, which is why I went toward RT first. I assumed it would have been the better choice for making any changes to the underlying system, but in the process of working with trac I've learned Python enough to hack together a number of custom solutions for our needs.

      Since I didn't go any further with RT after that first day, I can't say how well that would have worked, but in my case RT did leave a bad taste in my mouth.

    4. Re:RT by mrmagos · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oh, if I only had Mod points. RT is great. Once you get used to it, it's not too difficult to customize, and can be extended with the user-contributed modules (e.g. LDAP/Active Directory integration). There's even an O'Reilly book that outlines customization for different requirements/environments.

      --
      Never start vast projects with half-vast ideas.
    5. Re:RT by cblack · · Score: 1

      Another thumbs up for RT. I have used a few others including custom systems in the past and RT is towards the better end of the systems I've used. (trac is also nice). One of the really great things about RT is how easy it is to integrate email into the workflow. It is very easy to have an incoming email address like "helpdesk@mydomain.com" where people can send requests and get a link to their ticket. In addition all email you send in reply to that mail (or any that have the ticket number in the subject) automatically get captured into the log of the ticket viewable from the web interface.

    6. Re:RT by More_Cowbell · · Score: 5, Funny

      The website is down (slashdotted?) Do you know where I can submit a ticket?

      --
      Experience teaches only the teachable. -AH
    7. Re:RT by notque · · Score: 1

      Another vote for Request Tracker, the best ticket tracker I've ever used, deployed, and customized.

      --
      http://use.perl.org
    8. Re:RT by notque · · Score: 4, Informative

      RT used to be much more difficult to install than it is now. Even then, it wasn't very difficult if you are a Linux Administrator with a knowledge of perl.

      Now, it's extraordinarily simple. Initial understanding of some of the rights management will take a little bit of time depending on how complex you want it to be.

      --
      http://use.perl.org
    9. Re:RT by therufus · · Score: 2, Funny

      With all those acronyms, that could have possibly been the geekiest sentence ever! ;)

      It's humor people, laugh...

      --
      You moved your mouse. Please restart Windows for changes to take effect.
    10. Re:RT by zeath · · Score: 1

      My time frame for comparing the two packages, which I did not mention, was about a month ago. It wasn't that it was difficult to install; it was the configuration after it was installed that felt like I was on a treadmill, I was spending all my time working backwards and fighting with features I didn't need and managing permission settings way beyond the complexity that I required. In trac I was customizing ticket fields and setting up project workflows in a fraction of the time that it had taken me to give up on RT. I don't think I could have accomplished as much as I have done in the past month if I had tried to do so with RT, but this might just be an instance of trac being the right tool for the right job.

    11. Re:RT by tirerim · · Score: 2, Informative

      RT is indeed extremely customizable, and with enough effort can be made to do just about anything (we have scripts that automatically update tickets based on the state of files in our CVS tree, for example). However, there are a lot of settings, and the documentation is extremely haphazard, so if you want to do something complex, and you don't happen to think like an RT developer, it can take a long time to figure out how.

      And as for making really low level changes, the source can only be described as labyrinthine, and the database design isn't much to speak of either.

      As a whole, it's powerful, but messy.

    12. Re:RT by CRX588 · · Score: 1

      Yes, just started using this, slightly complex but very nice indeed.

    13. Re:RT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "Excuse me, sir. Seeing as how the V.P. is such a V.I.P., shouldn't we keep the P.C. on the Q.T.? 'Cause if it leaks to the V.C., he could end up M.I.A., and then we'd all be put on K.P." :)

    14. Re:RT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anonymous poster scorns open source solution while praising MS solution. Do I smell a shill?

    15. Re:RT by LizardKing · · Score: 1

      Can't agree. It's a pig to install, requiring dozens of Perl modules that stomp all over the filesystem and in FastCGI configuration at least it crashes regularly. It's also, as others have pointed out, more of a bug tracker rather than a support call tracker. If you need something akin to a bug tracker, then go with Bugzilla - it's also written in Perl, but it has fewer dependencies.

    16. Re:RT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use RT every day at work and have to say that it's not exactly easy and efficient in use. I would give another vote for Trac which I've used in combination with several open source projects in the past.

    17. Re:RT by matchboy · · Score: 1

      RequestTracker is free... so we get what we pay for.

      However, it's has some of the worst Interaction Design that I've seen in a long time. Our team has been using it for our support system for just over a year and we're counting the days until we are able to replace it with something else. There are too many steps to do simple tasks within it and it's too developer-centric. It looks like an application designed by developers, meaning there was little thought put into the design. It has lots of "features" though... many of which that we don't use... just like most applications that are designed by developers. ;-)

      --

      Robby Russell
      PLANET ARGON
      Robby on Rails
    18. Re:RT by Dr.+Smoove · · Score: 1

      We use RT to track thousands of support calls, and sales uses it for other shit. It might be a pain to install, but if you've got one admin whose job is to know the system well, it can be set up to do all sorts of crazy things. Aa far as the interface, yea it sucks shit. That's why I wrote a dialog frontend to the command-line rt. I can do pretty much everything quickly from a terminal, and I am porting it to C w/ ncurses soon enough so that I can do everything from the terminal.

      --
      "If you plant ice, you're gonna harvest wind."
    19. Re:RT by aldousd666 · · Score: 1

      Well, I can at least testify that HEAT is the most awful thing I have ever seen. They have all sorts of plugins and features, but each costs more $$, and even simple things like Emailing (Called the Business Rule Monitor) are ridiculous and die all the time. The web front end? No problem, as long as you shell out for the up to date system, and sign an agreement saying you have never seen a SQL database table before, ever, and if you have that you promise never to do it again. Their motto is 'simply powerful.' It's simply 'something' already, but not powerful.

      --
      Speak for yourself.
    20. Re:RT by Dr.+Smoove · · Score: 1

      The Jumbo feature can pretty much do everything you need to do to a ticket all from one page.

      --
      "If you plant ice, you're gonna harvest wind."
    21. Re:RT by CautionaryX · · Score: 1

      I dont see how Quick Time has anything to do with this.

    22. Re:RT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd agree that such a system could be written up in Microsoft Access, even using its native JET type engines, for a smaller operation (20 concurrent users @ most using its native JET engine).

      (... &, if you needed more? You can use stored procedures & SQLServer 2005 (after migrating the tables from .mdb form to SQL devices) & attach to them as needed, so more users can concurrently/simultaneously use the system).

      APK

      P.S.=> It's doable... apk

    23. Re:RT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I give RT good marks - you can really get it set up with little effort, and it's extremely extensible, although it does a pretty good job right out of the box. Been using it for our small business for several years, and have no plans to move away from it.

    24. Re:RT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think a better solution would be using something like php on a webserver, using a MySQL backend rather than MS Access. or you could even use the OpenOffice database program (forget it's name).

    25. Re:RT by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      Let me just say that I can't speak to the install as it's been up and running since before I started working at my current position. However, the user interface is abysmal. I think there might be one person who knows how to use the web interface. The web interface is PAINFULLY slow. Everyone uses our e-mail gateway. I can search my 7,000 + past e-mail history in Thunderbird / IMAP much faster and simpler than using RT's interface.

      I can't think of a web interface I've seen that's as bad. Using RT's web interface reminds me of the discussions I've heard regarding Lotus Notes!

      Maybe some of it is how we've (failed?) to set up RT.

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
    26. Re:RT by danpritts · · Score: 1

      My experience with a horribly slow RT web UI was that it was the mysql database that was too slow, not RT itself (except inasmuch as RT was probably not being real smart about what SQL queries it was running).

      I ended up throwing hardware at the problem; perhaps a mysql expert could do some good.

      certainly if you're running the default mysqld config, you should replace my.cnf with my-medium.cnf or my-large.cnf from the mysql distro; that might help a lot, since it will tell mysql to use more memory than the default piddly amount.

    27. Re:RT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anonymous moron jumps on the 'bag ms bandwagon'..

      Try to have an original thought buddy.. I was simply relating my experiences.

      Access allows you to build a customisable interface with relatively little programming skill. It also offers you the option of moving it to any kind of SQL back end (mysql if you like).

      The system I described ran the business, it processed work tickets, quotes, billing, time sheeting etc

      You want a program that can be made to fit your practices, not the other way around. If you can find OOS that allows someone easily and cheaply to build a work system as Access does then put up... or shut up.

  4. Same thing under Windows by bigman2003 · · Score: 1

    I'm looking for the same thing, only I need it to run under windows.

    I'm looking for something web-based, allowing clients to enter tickets, and programmers to respond to them.

    Any ideas?

    --
    No reason to lie.
    1. Re:Same thing under Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I wrote this (demo here) which could be abstracted/forked. It's a simple ticket-based support system written in PHP.

    2. Re:Same thing under Windows by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Try PHProjekt - I use it, and am quite happy with it. Group policies, project/task tracking, time logging, threaded discussions, etc. Pretty full-featured, simple to use, I can grant and limit access to whomever I choose.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    3. Re:Same thing under Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try Gemini from Countersoft

      http://www.countersoft.com/

      Runs on Windows under ASP.NET, C# & SQL Server. Free licence for single site with up to 5 users, internal use only. Commercial licence is US$810.

    4. Re:Same thing under Windows by crossmr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      if its web based..no you don't need it to run under windows. Its why god invented virtual machines. Web based means the back end should be completely transparent to the users and it doesn't matter if its run on a gerbil strapped to a hamster chasing a toaster.

    5. Re:Same thing under Windows by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 2, Funny

      it doesn't matter if its run on a gerbil strapped to a hamster chasing a toaster.

      I'd be careful of gerbil/hamster based backends. There's always that one sysadmin whose just too interested...

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    6. Re:Same thing under Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like sysaid by Ilient - www.ilient.com - they have a free version which is pretty good

    7. Re:Same thing under Windows by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      Other than ping delays and latency while the hamster sleeps. Though, I suppose it would still work...

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    8. Re:Same thing under Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try CommitCRM.com

    9. Re:Same thing under Windows by ultrafunkula · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure that's true. It may need to run under Windows because there is nobody in the company with sufficient Linux knowledge. There is no point having a system that isn't supported in the existing infrastrucure sometimes.

    10. Re:Same thing under Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trac runs on windows though why you'd want to is beyond me.
      http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracOnWindows

    11. Re:Same thing under Windows by nahdude812 · · Score: 1

      We ran MantisBT on a Windows 2003 server at my previous job. Added 30 or so extra lines to the config file which took the user's NT logon (automatically authenticated with WIA in IIS), looked them up in the user table, if they weren't present, did an LDAP call to find out who they are and add them to the database automatically, and finally set up the session to make them logged in. It made it seamless (though new users would have to visit the site once to get their account created in order to be added to any projects).

    12. Re:Same thing under Windows by crossmr · · Score: 1

      That depends on the method of customization. If its available as a virtual appliance configurable through a web interface (think zenoss) then no, it doesn't really matter. Honestly if someone is reading slashdot and isn't a linux guru..what are we doing helping them? ;)

    13. Re:Same thing under Windows by dragonator · · Score: 1

      Look at the Help Desk tracking stuff under Sharepoint.

    14. Re:Same thing under Windows by Angostura · · Score: 1

      We ran Mantis at a previous place and liked it. Akin to Bugzilla but with a nicer interface out of the box, as I recall.

    15. Re:Same thing under Windows by bigman2003 · · Score: 1

      Well, I can tell you how to help this 4 year Slashdot reader who is NOT a Linux guru: Make Audible.com work on Linux Make Dreamweaver work on Linux Make Premiere work on Linux Make Fireworks work on Linux That's what is keeping me from switching...I don't really care about Office, but those 3 programs (and Audible.com) are what I use all the time. I have an Ubuntu disk right in front of me, and a computer which is hobbling along in XP. It would be great to just do the install, but I can't- since it would take my productivity down to about zero.

      --
      No reason to lie.
  5. Eventum by Lordrashmi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A bit of shameless self promotion (since I am the lead developer), check out Eventum.

    It might not be the perfect fit for you, but it is stable and customizable. Right now it is lacking built in customer management features, instead it relies on a Customer API to integrate with other systems. Right now I am working on integration with Sugar CRM but do not yet have an ETA on when it will be released.

    1. Re:Eventum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hopefully it is a bit more stable than the link you provided.

    2. Re:Eventum by ViaD · · Score: 0

      We use Eventum for bug reporting/ITIL system in our company. It works like a charm.
      Might not be exactly what the article submitter want, but close :) If the SugarCRM
      implementation get up and running, I should be all the submitter want!

    3. Re:Eventum by jumperboy · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm currently evaluating Eventum for both IT support and generic issue tracking for service departments with no IT component. The only thing that feels beta about it is its obvious origin as a software issue tracker, but it won't require much modification to support generic issue tracking. Other than that, it is very stable, and customizable in a good way, not an evil, "I can't use this unless I completely rewrite the source code" kind of way.

      I have experience with RT, and have installed it for clients who absolutely love it. But if you're an admin who finds supporting RT to be a little traumatic, you owe it to yourself to try Eventum. I was able to download and install Eventum in a typically provisioned LAMP environment in 5 minutes without any problems at all. Like RT, configuration requires a thorough understanding of the options, but I had a working evaluation system in much less time than it normally takes me to configure RT. So far, source code edits appear to be necessary only for designing more complex workflow patterns, and I'm guessing that will be integrated into the admin interface before long.

      While I haven't properly evaluated email integration, Eventum is appealing because it can handle incoming mail via IMAP. I wish more issue trackers would do this, since I already have a robust email system that works great. I might as well be able to use it without rerouting support addresses through pipes, or creating complicated aliases (though it looks like Eventum supports this, as well).

      I'm not done evaluating Eventum, but I didn't want its mention to go unnoticed due to its recent release and small user base. I'm looking for an issue tracker that allows technical and nontechnical support staff alike handle tickets behind the scenes without a requirement for a public interface for the client, other than the email responses we generate. Eventum has a simple but powerful search interface, graphical statistics, reports, internal FAQ, canned responses, phone logging, and time tracking, among other features. The fact that it's offered by a popular opensource software vendor, MySQL, lends hope that it will be actively developed and maintained if it becomes successful. It's so easy to install, it's worth taking a look.

    4. Re:Eventum by DanFluidMind · · Score: 1

      I recently installed Eventum for tracking issues of the online applications our clients use. Functionally it does all the things we need it to do. But the user interface is so visually cluttered that it's difficult to use. I've had our staff using it for the past few weeks, and every one of them is very unsatisfied with how difficult the interface is to work with. (This is an ad agency, so these people are used to using things that are very well designed visually.) It's a classic example of a good program written by good programmers, but seemingly with no input from a graphic designer to help with the layout of the user interface. There's no focus and eye-leading to the layout, it's just a hodge-podge of everything thrown onto the page wherever it will fit. Everything seems to have equal weight. Even the boxes, titles and header bars stand out more than the actual content of the issues. Take a look at Trac, mentioned earlier. It has a very clean, easy to use interface. Unfortunately it doesn't seem to handle multiple projects (at least, nothing on their website indicates that it does.) If Eventum had as clean of an interface as Trac, it would be fantastic. As it is, I'm still looking around at my options, because the people here who will be using it day-to-day don't like using Eventum just because of the interface layout.

  6. CitrusDB by posit316 · · Score: 1

    Does citrusdb (http://www.citrusdb.org/) do what you need?

  7. One by m0nkyman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Postgresql. You may need to do some minor work customizing it....

    --
    ~ a low user id is no indication I have a clue what I'm talking about.
  8. Not quite OSS by FreemanPatrickHenry · · Score: 1

    It's not Free, but you might want to check out Cerberus Helpdesk. They've got a free (beer) version that's subject to some limitations. We considered using it at my last job (before settling on another solution.)

    --
    I have discovered a truly marvelous .sig which, unfortunately, this space is too small to contain.
    1. Re:Not quite OSS by deftcoder · · Score: 1

      What did you end up settling on?

      --
      Peace sells, but who's buying?
    2. Re:Not quite OSS by AugstWest · · Score: 1

      I can vouch for Cerberus, it's a great product. Yes, there's a free version, but the full license is about $300, which is peanuts for a ticketing/crm system, and it is the best one I've used.

      I've worked for companies that spent ludicrous amounts of money on ticketing systems, and I've always wished I could go back to Cerberus. I just left a job that used RT, and I hated it.

    3. Re:Not quite OSS by FreemanPatrickHenry · · Score: 1

      We ended up settling on a ticket tracking system by Intuit. I was pushing for the Cerberus solution, but the higher-ups settled on that, for whatever reason.

      --
      I have discovered a truly marvelous .sig which, unfortunately, this space is too small to contain.
    4. Re:Not quite OSS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Track IT! Sucks.

    5. Re:Not quite OSS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      aye, we use Track-IT and I rue the day it was chosen.

  9. Agreed on RT as First Step by zamboni1138 · · Score: 4, Informative

    This question has come up before, and I usually answer the same way. RT: Request Tracker is a good place to start. It is a Perl+Apache+MySQL based open source solution. The first few times you install it can be tricky. Find a good and current how-to.

    I have since moved away from RT and now use an in-house designed system. But I still give it two thumbs up.

    1. Re:Agreed on RT as First Step by speeDDemon+(nw) · · Score: 1

      One small caveat that I see with all the products mentioned is they all seem to be tailored towards / around software development / ticket / bug tracking. Can anyone suggest software more suited to a workshop? Say allowing tracking of jobs as they arrive/ leave etc? None of the options people list seem to cater or are adaptable for this purpose.

    2. Re:Agreed on RT as First Step by ElvenMonkey · · Score: 1

      How do you mean tracking jobs as they arrive / leave? Barcode scanned objects on arrival or similar?
      We've adapted various business practices to take advantage of RTs strengths, and pretty much most of our company uses RT to one extent or another, from IT through to sales. We've set up autoforwarders on our mail servers so that e-faxes to certain numbers arrive in particular queues, we've got cron jobs setup to send e-mails out for regular departmental tasks and so on.

      --
      "Joy is not in things; it is in us." Richard Wagner
    3. Re:Agreed on RT as First Step by speeDDemon+(nw) · · Score: 1

      How to explain. I guess the best way is to describe the 'story'

      My computer store has a workshop. We have computers / printers / anything at all come in to be 'fixed'
      I would like to be able to enter the 'job' as the customer brings in the computer / whatever, enter the customers contact details, description of the fault(s) etc. (issue tracking?)
      Whilst working on the fix, i would like to be able to add 'notes' to the 'job' I would also like to be able to track phone calls (CRM?)
      If the job was virus removal / something we might do again, be able to create a 'knowledgebase' around it and link (wiki?)
      When customer leaves we can put the 'job number' on their invoice for future reference so when they ring up and say you did THIS!!, we can look it up and remember

      shortest i could manage

    4. Re:Agreed on RT as First Step by rainer_d · · Score: 1

      RT Does all that.
      And more.
      (Together with its "cousin" RTFM)

      Advice: Install FreeBSD 6.2, update the ports and install it via the ports-system.

      Installing and using RT is one of the most sensible things you can do in IT.

      --
      Windows 2000 - from the guys who brought us edlin
    5. Re:Agreed on RT as First Step by Grax · · Score: 1

      My project SolutionsDesk ( http://www.cosentry.com/post/resources/L2%20Soluti ons%20Desk%20Datasheet.pdf ) does all of these things and more but, alas, I was not able to convince my company to create it as an open-source app.

    6. Re:Agreed on RT as First Step by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      I already said it but, now, looking at your more detailed use-case, I reaffirm: OTRS is probably what you are looking for.

  10. trac by zeath · · Score: 4, Informative

    I implemented trac at my workplace as a change control and task management system. We use it for both internal projects as well as billable work, with a number of custom fields for supporting our quoting system and quality control. The built-in Wiki also doubles as our IT documentation repository, all in one easy to access location.

    It is extremely extensible, and anything not readily available can be easily created. It didn't take much time to learn the class and data structures and I've modified existing plugins and written a few of my own to support our needs.

    1. Re:trac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Trac is a nice tool. Easy to setup easy to use. It can be used with
      Postgresql. You can authenticate with htdigest. There is also a
      command line interface so you can automate administration with scripts.
      You can also install subversion and browse the source trees through Trac.

    2. Re:trac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another vote for trac. Tickets, CRM, wiki, document storage all integerated with SVN.

    3. Re:trac by doti · · Score: 1

      One more vote for Trac.

      IMO, it's main strength is the simplicity for the user. An issue tracker is no good if nobody will use. I saw it many times: the IT department decides for a tool, install it, teaches everybody how to use it, and how important it is, but in the end nobody uses the tool. Trac interface is simple and nice, it does just what it has to do. Trac does not get in your way and feel like a burden.

      --
      factor 966971: 966971
  11. We use JIRA by GoatRavisher · · Score: 5, Informative

    JIRA runs under Linux. It is not open source, but the cost of the application and support is well worth it. I believe it is free to use for open source projects. They also provide the full source code, which has allowed us to heavily customize the application. When I started evaluating issue tracking systems this page proved to be rather useful http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_ticket- tracking_systems.

    --
    Man will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest. --Denis Diderot
  12. Be your own customer and ... by SageMusings · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Write one. If it's good, sell it.

    --
    -- Posted from my parent's basement
    1. Re:Be your own customer and ... by Nikron · · Score: 0

      NIH, much?

      --
      Disclaimer: Disregard the above post.
    2. Re:Be your own customer and ... by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      Write one, and if its good add it to the marketplace filled with hundreds of existing ones. Sometimes it is better to use someone else's hard work.

  13. phpBMS by Statecraftsman · · Score: 1

    While not conceived as a ticket tracking app, phpBMS might be able to suit your business better than a plain old ticket tracker. phpBMS runs on LAMP and can manage customers, invoicing, and sales/prospecting. I found it while looking for a way to do billing but it's turned out to be good for managing contacts.

  14. RT For sure by g8orade · · Score: 2, Informative

    Definitely thumbs up for RT.

    We are on a mission at the company where I work to replace all email / attachment based work management with it.

    You'd be amazed how far you can push RS using the concepts of owner, status, subject line, journaling, parent child / depends on depended on by tickets, auto-notification, attachments etc. all built in.
    If you think you need more structured data, you should at least see how far you can get prototyping it first in RT, using its minimal custom fields but also its custom views.
    Most ERP / CRM don't have the kind of infinite flexibility of workflow you can achieve using the features listed above. They do however have structured data.

    1. Re:RT For sure by yarbel · · Score: 4, Interesting

      RT does not scale well at all however. We have had to make major modifications to the source in order to support 200,000+ tickets.

    2. Re:RT For sure by jesse · · Score: 5, Informative

      yarbel,

      I'd love to hear a bit more about the scaling problems you had over on rt-devel@lists.bestpractical.com. We have end users (some of them paying customers, but plenty of them not) with well over a million tickets in their RT instances without any sort of performance problem.

      And I'd certainly love to see patches for anything you had to do to get performance up to snuff. (Since, well, we'd certainly like to improve things if users are running into trouble.

      Best,
      Jesse (RT's chief catherder)

    3. Re:RT For sure by kobaz · · Score: 1

      I had some scaling issues about 2 years ago. I can't go into much detail since I no longer have the install. We had about 10,000 tickets on a dual 1ghz machine with 4 gigs of ram. The server wasn't used for much else other than some small, low traffic websites. Loading the all tickets screen would take a good 40-50 seconds. Loading the queues (I forgot what they are called... the per person assignments) took about the same time as well. Our guys (3 users) were getting really slowed down waiting almost a minute per page load.

      We switched to the free version of Cerberus and things have been great since then.

      Sorry we couldn't stick with RT, it is a damn powerful system. I suppose lots of stuff has been fixed in 2 years.

      --

      The goal of computer science is to build something that will last at least until we've finished building it.
    4. Re:RT For sure by Neil+Watson · · Score: 1

      I saw this issue as well. A least part of this slow down was caused by RT not house cleaning its sessions. This resulted in RT querying a current session with all sessions that were ever created. I'm not sure if that is still a problem.

    5. Re:RT For sure by lamerfreak · · Score: 1

      I recently had to put in a ticket with Facebook - the reply was obvious that it came from RT, with a ticket number in the 4-5million mark. I think it obviously *can* scale well.

  15. Just a Hello from Davis by buswolley · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I'm sure glad there is some Woodland pride to compete with all this Davis pride just South. Nice website.

    --

    A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    1. Re:Just a Hello from Davis by buswolley · · Score: 1

      don't you mean off topic? I was replying to the parent's sig.

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

  16. Vtiger by Blackknight · · Score: 4, Informative

    Check out Vtiger, it's a really nice CRM and also has ticketing features.

    1. Re:Vtiger by yhetti · · Score: 2, Informative

      Seconded. Vtiger is an excellent system that's based on a fork of SugarCRM from a while back. I've been running it for about 8 months production and I've been extremely happy with it. You can make custom fields for time tracking and cheat a little bit to get asset management. Overall, B+/A-

    2. Re:Vtiger by Corson · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the open-source version requires imap-2004d and that means you need to downgrade to RHEL/CentOS 3.x. In my experience it won't work with cyrus-imapd.

    3. Re:Vtiger by Russianspi · · Score: 1

      What!? vTiger is solid, and quite easy to set up. It can use localhost as the mail server, or connect to just about any type of mail server (see link): http://wiki.vtiger.com/index.php/Vtiger_CRM_5.0.3_ Web_mail_-_Working_Scenarios. It also has an optional "Customer Portal" so that customers can log in and create their own issues if you so choose.

    4. Re:Vtiger by Corson · · Score: 1

      Buddy, why waste time with this? Go to http://wiki.vtiger.com/index.php/Vtiger_CRM_5.0.3_ -_Installation_Manual_for_Linux#Linux_Dependency_P ackages and read "imap-2004d" under _all_ Linux distros. And if you try instaling vTiger w/o it it will complain the imap support is missing.

  17. Did you index it? by g8orade · · Score: 2, Interesting

    hmmm.
    We've been running it for 2 plus years now, have 100,000 plus tickets, and it's quite fast. We did have to add an index recently when coming back to All Tickets view and many of us have a lot of queues.

    I see others have had issues / bad experiences. Our shop has some very experienced Oracle guys and someone who, so far, has been able to make it do everything we've wanted it to using Perl mods. (auto assignment based on subject contents, custom fields, etc.).
    Maybe other tools are easier when you don't have this kind of support.

    We are using it also for project management and in conjunction with Twiki; it's quite effective to create an RT ticket and link it to a wiki page, instead of uploading attachments. This way we end up creating a web FAQ / history and have RT all at once.

    1. Re:Did you index it? by notque · · Score: 1

      I think the support is important. I was able to hack together any sort of odd request that the business asked. That was something I couldn't have done with other systems. You got whatever they put in with other ticketing systems. With RT, you ask for something, you get it provided you have some support.

      We connected into other systems, had real time displays of information to help them answer questions inside the system. It was very nice until we were bought out, and started using a monolithic system that have absolutely nothing you want.

      Good times.

      --
      http://use.perl.org
  18. Kayako by getRoot · · Score: 1

    We're using kayako (http://www.kayako.com/) as our user facing trouble ticketing system. It's not free (cost us something like a couple of hundred US$) but it is very functional and includes mechanisms to track costs. It has a bunch of stuff included that we don't use - like live support etc - as well as a bunch of cool stuff that I haven't seen elsewhere (like AJAX based searching of knowledge base articles as someone updates a trouble ticket). It also integrates nicely with our LDAP based single signon system. We support 6 remote offices and about 200 users with the product. You can even pay an extra license fee to have a non-branded version.

    1. Re:Kayako by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to use kayako where i work, it blows. The search function _doesn't_ work, replies don't always get sent (yet it would mark the tickets as closed), not something I'd wanna spend hundreds on personally :)

    2. Re:Kayako by Jinjuku · · Score: 0

      We use it and all the items you complain about works for us. Hmmmm, interesting. Search and email have been 0% problem for us.

  19. Was your Access Solution web hostable? by g8orade · · Score: 1

    RT can be run in the open web, hosted. BestPractical sells this I think.

    Access based solution also != Free.

  20. Remedy under WINE by MeditationSensation · · Score: 1

    Some people have been able to run Remedy via WINE under Linux.

    http://appdb.winehq.org/appview.php?iVersionId=232 1

    1. Re:Remedy under WINE by carlivar · · Score: 1

      Huh? Remedy is an expensive commercial system. Why would he want that? (much less under WINE).

      --
      Vote Libertarian
  21. Trac (Open Source; Python) by joost · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Trac is an enhanced wiki and issue tracking system for software development projects. Trac uses a minimalistic approach to web-based software project management. Our mission is to help developers write great software while staying out of the way. Trac should impose as little as possible on a team's established development process and policies.

    It provides an interface to Subversion, an integrated Wiki and convenient reporting facilities.

    1. Re:Trac (Open Source; Python) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If Trac is so good, tell me how you get a list of tickets you've submitted over the past year(not assigned to you, just submitted).

      Seriously, go try and see how it has no way to do that.

    2. Re:Trac (Open Source; Python) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "Seriously, go try and see how it has no way to do that."

      Sure there's no way. It is an open source product (as in "well, you can modify the source any way you want", backed up by a database where start date for a ticket is already stored and still "there's no way" to send an easy SQL query to the database. And some idiot moderate this as "insightful".

      Well, I don't even use a recent Trac version, but here we go:

      On main page go "View Tickets"; choose "6 - All Tickets By Milestone (Including closed)". Then go "This report: copy" and give it another name (just to preserve the original). On the copy go to "Edit"; then go to "SQL Query for Report" and modify it to your leisure (you just need to add a "where clause"); done.

      What's more: since there is such a standard and *simple* template system for database queries you can add the ones significant to your *specific* needs in minutes, few hours at most. Try that on more "corporate aware" products and then learn what's easy and what's difficult. And, believe me, no matter what you use, you *will* have to customize it to your company needs.

  22. Look into some CMSs by kc8jhs · · Score: 1

    I would look into some open source CMSs. Traq is an excellent option. I like doing web based setups to help clients feel more involved in the process.

    I am working on a site right now that uses Drupal 5.2 and a few modules for it such as Casetracker and CCK to build just such a site. You can add modules to incorporate almost any functionality such as email notifications, SMS, source code tracking, revisions. See for more info and a quick how to.

  23. OSTicket by appleguru · · Score: 2, Interesting

    http://www.osticket.com/

    It works well; I use it integrated with Help Center Live

    1. Re:OSTicket by baxrob · · Score: 2, Informative

      eticket http://eticket.sourceforge.net/ is a newer fork of osticket that's being actively maintained. (osticket doesn't seem to be available currently.)

  24. Try bug trackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bug trackers such as bugzilla can do a great job of tracking small to medium sets of customers.

  25. RightNow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whatever you choose, don't let it be RightNow. It's runs ActiveX and is remotely hosted. It's a very demanding program, slow, and buggy. It has a lot of nice features, but it's not very intuitive. Alas, my work uses it.

  26. Keystone is still alive and kicking. by Shayde · · Score: 2, Informative

    Take a look at http://www.stonekeep.com/keystone.php

    Opensource, non-alpha, many many users active, still being supported and worked on.

    (Obdisclaimer. I wrote it. :)

    --
    Event Management Solutions : http://www.stonekeep.com/
    1. Re:Keystone is still alive and kicking. by speeDDemon+(nw) · · Score: 1

      How about putting your demo back online so we can test / see the product!

    2. Re:Keystone is still alive and kicking. by Shayde · · Score: 1

      The demo is offline because folks were spamming it. The product page has screenshots on it though.

      Drop me emailif you want to see the live demo.

      --
      Event Management Solutions : http://www.stonekeep.com/
  27. I'd Tell you... by MrCawfee · · Score: 1, Funny

    ... but it will cost you $150/hour.

  28. Yeah, it's been.... by AugstWest · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...at least 2 months since this question was asked.

    It amazes me the stuff that gets rejected vs the stuff that gets accepted over and over and over again.

    Can we have another open-source cash-register thread tomorrow?

  29. OTRS by oedneil · · Score: 0

    OTRS is what I use for tracking. It seems built specifically to deal with tickets opened through an email support box, but has lots of internal tracking features as well.

    1. Re:OTRS by ShaunC · · Score: 1

      Add another vote for OTRS. It's what we use at work to manage all sorts of incoming helpdesk tickets, feature requests, bug reports, etc. It doesn't have any sort of calendaring/timetracking feature that I'm aware of, but it supports internal-only notes to be attached to any ticket. You could easily use this capability to keep track of the time you spend working on a particular issue.

      --
      Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
    2. Re:OTRS by Henkc · · Score: 1

      Add yet another vote. We use it in a busy ISP environment, and it works well. Open source, good ol' perl, lots of features, stable, highly customisable and "just works". PostgreSQL or MySQL as a backend. Unlike so many other open source projects, this one is actively maintained and developed with a large user base, so it's constantly improving.

    3. Re:OTRS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me too, se tup a system for computer support for 100 users in a University
      maths department -- works a charm

    4. Re:OTRS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Completely agree with the 'just works' post - I installed it on an internal server at our store in 2003 and haven't touched it since. It is up to several hundred thousand emails and a quick du -hs of the /var/lib/mysql/otrs directory is at 4.0GB. It shows no slowdown, very quick. And the latter versions have a field when answering or closing a ticket called "Time units (work units)" that you fill in and is stored with that ticket. We don't use it so I don't know how to get reports from it but I'm sure it's there. Great piece of software. A little hard to set up, but worth it.

  30. Custom workflow templates by adochan · · Score: 1

    On a related question:
    I am looking around for a ticketing system that allows custom workflow templates based on the type of ticket or workorder, to allow a ticket to be assigned to the proper team or person based on an attribute of the ticket.

    Trac does seem to have a custom workflow but only one that is global for all tickets in a project, and the same seems to go for other projects.

    I checked the Wikipedia article on the comparison of issue tracking systems, but have not yet really found a good match. Any applications I should look at?

    1. Re:Custom workflow templates by g8orade · · Score: 1

      This is a very interesting question and I'd mod you up if I could.

      We have put in some minimal workflow steps in our installation but now we are looking at (very expensive) commercial tools (tibco, oracle, others) for "BPM".

      First, unless you create them, RT doesn't have any structured data points against which you can write workflow rules. Not sure about the other systems mentioned in this thread. So you're limited to queue, Subject line, and body text searches.

      That said, you can get part the way down the road using RT:
      RT already starts by putting tickets into a named queue that can have an email address mapped to the queue or you can simply create a new ticket in a specified queue from within RT. The email interface is quite powerful if you are trying to get processes that have no existing system but email and attachments into some system.

      Upon create, you can write rules that assign initial owner based on some data being in the subject. If you're creating tickets manually or from a web form, you can have some structured data in custom RT fields. Then you can write rules based on those data points in PERL.

      So, you are kind of at the mercy of how skilled in PERL you are, or in database processing.

      It is worth it, though, to write up some sample business processes and see how far you can get with RT, perhaps mated to a wiki, and then relying on persons to follow directions. You can then go after automation and structured data after you really know your work's detailed steps.

    2. Re:Custom workflow templates by adochan · · Score: 1

      Thanks for your follow-up and I will definitely have a look at RT from this perspective.

      Writing up the business processes is of course the first step, however I am mainly looking for a solution with custom workflows to allow the different authorisation flows, which are relatively easy to map.

  31. OTRS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  32. COULD NOT FIND ANYTHING ?? by kevorkian · · Score: 3, Informative

    wow .. all he found was "pre pre pre alpha alpha alpha"

    the author did not do a very hard search.

    First and for most .. RT Open source , even has commercial support if you want.Ive been using RT in many forms for at least 10 years now. I remember it back in the late 90s.

    And then of course there is JIRA. This may be more for dev work. Most places ive been used RT for anything that MIGHT face the customer and the areas that had 'issues' and 'projects' that would end up closing at some time. But JIRA was used by the devs for bug tracking and coding projects.

    of course there are a lot of others .. remedy is another that pops into my mind.

    Seriously though. How could you have enough experience and knowledge to run your 'side business' and never have run into either of these projects in your travels. Where have you really worked that they have not used a ticketing system ? Or perhaps you are fresh out of school. But even fresh out of school. I would think that even the dorm network operators would have used SOME sort of ticketing system that you would have been exposed to , if even from the 'customer' side.

    If your google-fu is so weak as to have not found these , then I fear for your customers.

    there is even a nice wiki page comparing all the products..

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_issue_t racking_systems

    1. Re:COULD NOT FIND ANYTHING ?? by phoenixwade · · Score: 1

      If you are going to be so condescending and pedantic, learn how to spell foremost correctly. You made a complete ass of yourself with that error. Unless, of course, he thinks that tracking system is "For Most" of the users out there.

      Seriously, if you are going to chide someone for being condescending and pedantic, then just do it. Pointing out a common grammatical error or spelling mistake, or some other minor posting error makes you look like a complete ass who needs to justify your your commentary. Besides, it's potentially misleading as well; you seem to be indicating that his post would have been acceptable, if he spelled that one word correctly. That you went to the trouble to point it out at all indicates otherwise.
      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    2. Re:COULD NOT FIND ANYTHING ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not common. That's ignorance. He didn't make that "common" (it's not) mistake and you know it. He DID make an ass out of himself. When you're attacking someone, you don't fuck up. You don't give the other person an inch.

  33. Open source or cheap? by patp · · Score: 1


    When you say open source, do you mean you really want access to the source or you just dont want to pay too much (or anything at all)?

    If you want quick, easy and cheap, check out workroll (https://www.workroll.com). It is java based and runs right out of the box on top of tomcat. I am able to configure this to have multiple accounts for each client and issues related to just them as well as global issues. Comes with a lightweight database so hardly any system configuration overhead.

    I dont mind paying a little to another small developer for their good efforts. After all, I make my income from software. I just dont like paying $1000's.

  34. Peregrine Service Center by deviantsteve · · Score: 1

    We run peregrine service center, its mostly an enterprise level application but also support assets change management and requests. If you need something fairly hardcore. Its mostly designed for enterprise call centers though.

  35. Re:RT -- Use RoundUp instead.. by cowmix · · Score: 4, Informative

    RoundUp (which is Python based) is a great system..

    Its self contained.. a GREAT email interface.. easy to setup and easy to extend.

  36. Taskhopper? by Sadsfae · · Score: 0

    If you want something web-based, try out "Taskhopper"

    http://taskhopper.com/

    It's an addon for the Joomla! Content Management System ( http://www.joomla.org/ )

    I have been using it extensively to track customer issues, log new requests, and update and manage any manner of work I might do.

    --
    Have a squat over at the hobo house.
  37. Ticket System by kophey · · Score: 1

    I am a big fan of the cerberus system. http://www.cerberusweb.com./ It's a fully featured system and depending on your needs you can use the free version of it. If your company is just you and a few other people. you might like to give it a try.

  38. dotProject by danuary · · Score: 1

    It seems to me that the poster might benefit more from a project management system than a trouble ticketing system. I'd see if dotProject would do the trick. It does have a rudimentary ticketing module to assist interaction with customers, too - FWIW.

    1. Re:dotProject by Crimsonjade · · Score: 1

      I gave up dotProject after I found myself spending more time using dotProject than actually doing work.

    2. Re:dotProject by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Hear, Hear! Project Management software is intended for mid-large sized groups. Add the PHP factor, and I'd only suggest it for large groups that _have_ to have it.

  39. Robust Time Tracking, Project Mgmt and Billing by Henry+Rearden · · Score: 1

    Check out www.positiveware.com. Not open source, nearly free, and in use by small it teams to manage their business. Robust collaboration means you know what everyone is up to, and real-time time tracking means you know how you are doing against customer budget. Mac and Windows friendly, especially on Firefox and IE, nearly as good on Safari. Not iPhone friendly because of the lack of Flash support. And yes, this is shameless self-promotion.

    1. Re:Robust Time Tracking, Project Mgmt and Billing by innatetech · · Score: 1

      This looks very nice, but until you get rates and invoicing going you're going to have a whale of a time drawing users away from FreshBooks/Basecamp etc.

    2. Re:Robust Time Tracking, Project Mgmt and Billing by Henry+Rearden · · Score: 1

      Thanks for sharing your thoughts. I think our biggest challenge is actually communicating the benefits and features, because my sales experience with Basecamp and Freshbooks is that in three years I have met one real Basecamp user and no Freshbooks users. These apps don't really scale (in a usage way, not a database way) so I think I have solution for teams of freelancers, or a small shop that uses a mix of employees and contractors. I may be crazy, but these apps strike me as more Web 2.0 smoke then fire.

      I do offer rates and billing, and what I think is a far more robust interface for managing work. We have a hell of a lot of work to do on the app, but so far my customers love it.

      I really appreciate your thoughts.

    3. Re:Robust Time Tracking, Project Mgmt and Billing by innatetech · · Score: 1

      Just went and read your blog, saw your entry on legal billing. You may have something there. You'll probably want to take a look at some of the big existing competitors before you enter that market, though. It's lucrative, but demanding and its a backwater--get too much into it and you run a risk of overspecializing. Consider a legal billing plugin or addon.

    4. Re:Robust Time Tracking, Project Mgmt and Billing by innatetech · · Score: 1

      Also, if rates and invoicing are working, I'd suggest editing this page: http://www.positiveware.com/mambo/content/view/66/ 74/ , where it says "Rates and invoicing (coming soon)"

  40. OTRS by steppin_razor_LA · · Score: 1

    This has been covered in a few previous "ask slashdots". When I was looking for a ticket system last time, I found some references to OTRS and ended up implementing at my company. IT supports ~200 people and we use it to track helpdesk, report, and feature requests. The system is open source and runs on a number of platforms including Linux and Windows.

    --
    Evolution: love it or leave it
  41. Major missing point... by Sparr0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    All the other replies are pointing out great "ticket tracking" software, but I think that is the easy half of this request. I too have searched for what the original submitter is searching for. The key thing that is missing from the existing offerings is hour and work logs. Put simply, at the end of a ticket we need how much to bill the client for. Integrated invoicing would be awesome.

    1. Re:Major missing point... by analogueblue · · Score: 1

      JIRA (while not free/open source) does do this, and does it quite well, with sub-tasks time rolling up into parent tasks, etc....

    2. Re:Major missing point... by PGillingwater · · Score: 1

      If you're looking for a ticketing system with worklogs and project planning, check out:

      http://outreach.sourceforge.net/

      It's not actively maintained at present, but we would do so if enough companies signed up for support.

      On a related note, we are about to release another tool, which has a powerful work-flow engine:

      http://bflow.sourceforge.net/

      The Web site is incomplete, and the software will be released next month. Check it out.

      --
      Paul Gillingwater
      MBA, CISSP, CISM
    3. Re:Major missing point... by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      RT has time tracking.

    4. Re:Major missing point... by _ivan · · Score: 1

      Freeside (http://www.sisd.com/freeside) includes an integrated ticketing system based on RT, as well as invoicing, customer tracking and so on. HTH.

  42. ServiceDesk Plus by shack420 · · Score: 1

    I support staff and guests at 5 hotels around NZ and use the free edition of ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus (http://manageengine.adventnet.com/products/servic e-desk/download.html?free) which is by far the best system I have tried (RT included). It can also integrate with their network monitoring tool which is a bonus. It was easy to implement too, and can import user lists from AD (and yes I did see you mention Linux :P) Jay

  43. dotProject by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 1
    I think dotProject will do most, if not all, of what you need....from the site:
    Features Include:
    • User Management
    • Email based trouble Ticket System, (Integrated voxel.net's ticketsmith)
    • Client/Company Management
    • Project listings
    • Hierarchical Task List
    • File Repository
    • Contact List
    • Calendar
    • Discussion Forum
    • Resource Based Permissions
    --
    'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
  44. I was sure the first post was going to say..... by nak_slim · · Score: 0

    Bugzilla, "not just for code anymore".

  45. dotProject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not too sure what your requirements mean to you, but dotProject (http://www.dotproject.net/) has good task separation for multiple clients. It's really project management software so you may find the ticket tracking a little weak, but it's functional enough for many tasks. Tasks are assigned to projects and project are assigned to companies, but tickets are assigned to users. It does track time usage and billing rates and you can attach documents to tasks and create task logs. I think it's pretty slick, though development seems a little slow. The interface is also a little 'quirky' until you grok the flow.

  46. Dumb question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is the difference between a ticket tracking solution and a bug tracking solution?

  47. ClockingIT by Lars512 · · Score: 1

    I'd try ClockingIT, which is a rails-based interface. I had been using roundup, which is nice because it's very easily customizable, but moved to ClockingIT because of the free hosting they provide, and the simple workflow. The nicest thing is that you interactively use the page itself to log your hours, so you don't have to manage the time side of things. It supports multiple customers, projects, milestones, etc, and has a built-in wiki, forum and reporting interface. It's really quite nice.

    1. Re:ClockingIT by Fudgie · · Score: 1

      Just thought I'd mention that ClockingIT is open-source as well (MIT/X11) so you're free to do whatever you want with it. It's quite stable, and under active development. It's been developed by me, so let me know if you feel something is missing or could be done better.

  48. DCL by lvmoon · · Score: 1

    Take a look at DCL http://dcl.sourceforge.net./ It has served me rather well in the past.

    1. Re:DCL by sourcehunter · · Score: 1

      I've used DCL for years - as an issue and time tracking system. I even wrote some code to generate some reports out of it that I use directly for billing clients... Works like a champ... I am a little biased b/c I was added to the project team this past year, but still... great product.... and no where near pre-alpha stage.

      --

      quis custodiet ipsos custodes - Juvenal
  49. Customer management rather than ticketing by SSpade · · Score: 1

    You say you want a ticketing system, but that doesn't sound like what you really need (if it were, I'd suggest RT for issue tracking or Trac for defect tracking).

    I'd take a look at SugarCRM, or one of it's forks instead. MySQL only, so be careful to keep regular backups.

  50. Re:JIRA... is cheap by trajano · · Score: 1

    JIRA may not be open source, but it is still significantly cheaper than some of the commercial products out there.

    --
    Archie - CIO-for-hire :-)
  51. Eventum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm surprised no one has mentioned Eventum. It takes a little while to customise, but once it is up and running the email integration is oh sooo sweet.

  52. Zentrack by frostband · · Score: 1
    Zentrack seems easy enough. Has some good features. I'll have to say that I have only used one other system and zentrack is far superior.

    http://www.zentrack.net/

    1. Re:Zentrack by innatetech · · Score: 1

      I've also had good experiences w/Zentrack, although the interface is a little clunky.

  53. what about OTRS... by dandu · · Score: 1

    what about OTRS... http://otrs.org/ ?

  54. RT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am surprised people still have to ask this question. RT is probably the most most mature Free Software for this purpose (having been around since 1998 or so). Several entities, big and small, use it - take a look at their "praise" page. I personally find that most small businesses I have had to email for support (Vandyke Software, for SecureCRT - an example) use RT.

    Several suggestions you'll get here would be for bug tracking tools. Those are not what you want - you want a trouble ticketing system; and that is RT.

  55. There's a good comparison on Wikipedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
  56. Bugdar! by Soracte · · Score: 1

    I recommend you Bugdar. It is perfect for smaller companies. Simple to use and has all the necessary features a ticket tracker must have, without the too-complex-and-never-used features. The owner, Robert Sesek is a very helpful guy, helped me a lot, so all I could do is to encourage you to give it a try.

  57. WorkOrder TS might work by Skylinux · · Score: 1

    I wrote WorkOrder TS to track service tickets for computer stores but it can handle more. It currently keeps track of instore tickets, onsite appointments and it can run multiple branches from one installation.
    Ohhh yeay, did I mention that it is almost operating system independent since it is web based?

    It is not open source but a free (not demo) edition is available and a Pro edition can be purchased for not much money. It's is pre 1.0 release but it is already being used by a lot of companies around the world.

    WorkOrder TS - Web-based, Operating System independent Work Order Management System

    --
    Everyone who buys Wild Hunt will receive 16 specially prepared DLCs absolutely for free, regardless of platform.
  58. Mantis by oglueck · · Score: 1

    I have used Mantis in my former job for that kind of stuff. As far as I remember it does all you want.

  59. Try vTiger (SugarCRM clone) by cheros · · Score: 1

    What I like about vTiger is that it allows you to try it all - SugarCRM, Zimbra et all all want money upfront before you can test the useful bits..

    Website is vtiger.com.

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  60. Project Dune by chiraz90210 · · Score: 1

    I started Project Dune in 2004 and rewrote a couple of things. It's Java + Hibernate + GWT at the moment. Timesheets are still in development, but the intention is to connect everything off the trouble tickets (issues) that you create in the system. http://www.sf.net/projects/pdune G>

  61. ITIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone know of any that support the ITIL framework?

  62. allocPSA: open source task, client, fault tracking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try allocPSA

    From the website:

    allocPSA, the premier online Professional Services Automation solution, has now been released as open source software under the popular GNU Public License (GPL). Businesses worldwide can now obtain allocPSA, complete with source code, along with the right to modify that code, free of charge.
    allocPSA is a suite of integrated applications (a Professional Services Automation suite) designed for services-based organisations, allocPSA enables services organisations to achieve better profitability by improving staff efficiency through increased utilisation of productive time, better planning and integrated knowledge management.

  63. The tough choices of windows by CarpetShark · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm looking for the same thing, only I need it to run under windows.


    You can have features, windows, and running. Choose two.
  64. Yet Another Trac Fan here... by AlXtreme · · Score: 1

    I've been using Trac for a couple of years now, also for external projects where customers directly submit tickets. It was a bit rough around the edges, but over the last year a number of good improvements have gone in without compromising the ease-of-use.

    This is a ticketing system where people don't need an hour of training to understand what's going on. The integrated wiki allows for note-keeping (I tend to use it for tracking my hours too), and the SVN-browser is simple but useful.

    If you need something more structured, try some of the CRM-packages. However I've been in your shoes, tried Trac and haven't looked back.

    --
    This sig is intentionally left blank
  65. Answer OTRS by Lazypete · · Score: 1

    Check out OTRS

    www.otrs.org

  66. Customizability by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

    I work for a company that chose Sugar CRM. We wanted something where we could connect it to our own customer database, and could add links to our own tools, like extra buttons to edit the customer info, purge them, perform system maintenance, etc. Unfortunately, none of the systems we found allowed this. The best we could do was to find an open source system that was easy to edit. We modified the pages to include extra buttons that link to external web applications. It's not the best integration, but it works. I was actually very disappointed that none of the tools offered any kind of "plug-in" functionality.

  67. Jira is open source, but it is not free by ruewan · · Score: 1

    You can download the Jira source easily, but you are supposed to buy a license if it is being used commercially.

  68. GLPI by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

    GLPI http://www.glpi-project.org/?lang=en is worth a look.

    It's LAMP-based and does inventory tracking too. It supports user-submitted tickets and has a rudimentary concept of service levels/escalation. Reporting needs some work, but you can always use third party tools for this.

    --
    AT&ROFLMAO
  69. Helpspot helpdesk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have been using HelpSpot for the last year. The integrated Forums, KB, time tracking, templating, and various integration methods are outstanding.

  70. You might try Taskjitsu by rbulling · · Score: 1

    Taskjitsu could work for you. This professional services automation package tracks customers, projects, tasks, and time, and has extensive reporting features. It's an open source Java application distributed under the GPL.

    It might be particularly useful to you if you want to track time spent per job. You would create a separate Taskjitsu project for each job, then log time per project in the time sheet system.

    It runs under Tomcat 5.0 on a variety of different operating systems.

    My company, PKR Internet, provides commercial support for Taskjitsu. Taskjitsu's motto is "The Art and Science of Tasks and Time".

  71. RT by pyster · · Score: 0

    I have seen several implementations of RT that has blown away every other ticketing system I have used. This ofcourse was because there were clued people behind the configurations/mods.

    One implementation had problem drop down boxes could lead to possible problems/solutions/hints on where to look for helpful resources related to the problem. Old tickets can be made to flash red to scream for attention. Can readily link to customer databases. Service hooks can be added to to interface with sql, radius, edit zone/named files, whatever. At glance past history with links to all previous cases. Information about services supplied to the customer (ips, dns, interface, contact info...) And the end users can access the system via any webbrowser, meaning no end user software to install. The monetary savings there is only beat by the lack of frustration of a software roll out and the other complications of installing software on machines with unknown stability or tethering users to a particular OS. Oh, and you can book mark search/sort parameters which is extremely useful for finding dropped tickets, tickets of a particular type, that are owned by a group or individual. Oh, and SANELY formatted!!! No tabs, no freaken side scrolling and truncation of fields. TAB friendly too... no keyboard to mouse keyboard to mouse over and over again for just basic stuff. Did I mention that RT works very well for the end user OVER DIAL UP on a http://bestpractical.com/rt

    But again. My experience with RT was also backed up with good programmers who knew what a real ticketing system should look like. It is because of these experiences that i loath all other ticketing systems for their .

    Worse ticketing systems? Heat, Vantive, and MAS 90 (not really a ticketing system, but i've seen it used to track customer issues).

    Heat is the ticketing system of those overly concerned with metrics. It wastes times and impedes progress while giving the customer a bad customer experience. Vantive is a resource hog, requires wincap to be installed, and dislikes slow machines. Forget about ever getting a good over view of open cases at glance. You will click from tab to tab... keyboard to mouse over and over again. Oh, and did I mention both of these like to crash at the worse times? They whittle down the sanity of anyone who is forced to use them over any period of time. Breaking their will and pushing them closer and closer to going postal or quitting. Expect slamming of keyboards/mice/heads to be common place where implemented. Productivity killers. End of Line.

    Pyster

  72. Mantis, not Trac by whitroth · · Score: 1

    We tried Trac at work for a ticketing system, and it was ludicrously hard to install. The upshot was neither I, nor the other sysadmin, could get it going acceptably. Mantis was an easy install (except for having to tell MySQL to use pre-4.1 (?) passwords), and Mantis is what we've continued to use.

        mark

  73. A few suggestions by zimage · · Score: 1

    I tested Double Choco Latte about three years ago and didn't care for it, don't remember why anymore. Most recently, I've used Cerberus Helpdesk and was very happy with its features, though I don't think it's GPL, just open-source.

  74. doyourownwork = asshole by dbc001 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Whoever tagged this post as "doyourownwork" is an asshole who has no understanding of the way The Internet and it's online communities work. For any question that gets posted on Slashdot, there are dozens if not hundreds of Slashdot readers who want to know the answer. I wouldn't be surprised if 20% of the Slashdot community is running some kind of business that might have a need for a ticket tracking and CRM software setup. Many Slashdot readers are also very friendly, so while a person could easily spend hours researching a question like this, it's far more effective to come to Slashdot and benefit from the experience of it's users.

    So to all the douchebags who criticize people who ask questions on Slashdot: FUCK YOU.

    1. Re:doyourownwork = asshole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, I couldn't believe how timely this question was asked. We are hitting crunch time on our current software, they've raised the price and our budget's been cut. Time to find something good, inexpensive, and we've got to do it quickly.

    2. Re:doyourownwork = asshole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I didn't even know stuff like this existed in the open source domain (I never really thought about it), yet it will vastly improve my workflow now that I'm looking at them. This did help me.

      Offtopic rant: The parent post is right about about the douchebags, but tagging in general has become a waste, irritating enough for me to turn it off even though I like the principle. How many goddamn posts have to get tagged "interesting"? Or what about the stupid "yes" "no" "maybe" tags whenever there's a question mark in the title?. It doesn't help, or inform me about an article's content, but serves to remind me how moronic some of the participants are.

  75. Web based option by speedphreak · · Score: 1

    Sidejobtrack.com I've played around with it for some side work that I've done. Worked well enough for me. YMMV.

  76. Trouble Ticket Express by zerofoo · · Score: 1

    I use this:

    http://www.troubleticketexpress.com/

    It isn't a huge, feature-rich, bit of software, but it is small and reliable and has just enough functionality to be useful.

    -ted

  77. Cerberus Helpdesk by zaaj · · Score: 1
    I've been using Cerberus Helpdesk software for a number of years for an internal IT ticket tracking system at work. It does have several features we're not using, which are intended for external facing setups - an end user web interface with knowledgebase searching / ticket managment, plugin authentication to several different other systems so your users don't necessarily need yet another password, SLA based ticket due dates, open vs. gated ticket queues.

    Anyway, it's PHP/MySQL - they went away from "optimized" (obscured) PHP code years ago, so the source is there - the user forums have a custom mods area, and they have a single-email-address version that's free. It was pretty cheap when we bought it for multi-domains as well. The only part that's closed soruce is the email parser that checks the license key as it receives email to turn into tickets.

    Here's the product website

    1. Re:Cerberus Helpdesk by truk · · Score: 1

      Zaaj is right. I've been using Cerberus Helpdesk for 4 years with a moderately-sized helpdesk, and it has worked well. In the more recent versions, you can ditch the closed-source email parser and use cron and their PHP parser script to get customer email into the system. (A lot of folks use it with S-POP and Gmail, and we have found it to be reliable with Exchange.) If you know a little PHP, modifying Cerberus to work with an LDAP authentication system, even Active Directory, would be easy. Support from them has been pretty good, but I haven't had to use it much. There are some CRM-lite features in the product, but only knowing your exact requirements would indicate if there was a fit.

      Cerberus Helpdesk is worth a look. You can monitor 1 email account for free, and you can set up the software in about 30 minutes.

  78. For local, consider Journyx. But hosted works too. by innatetech · · Score: 1

    Journyx ( www.journyx.com ) , while not open source itself, is built with open source tools and has an API, etc. It does project tracking, time tracking, expense accounting, billing, invoicing, etc. The last time I looked at it, it wouldn't handle my rate schedule but it looks like that part of it has been made more flexible in the last few versions--in fact, I'm going to install it again as I was disappointed when I had to pass it up. There are also decent hosted choices, which is sometimes easier for a one man shop--you don't have to worry about maintaining it, if your server situation doesn't have a lot of fault tolerance/redundancy, etc. In that case, I'd look at the Basecamp/Freshbooks combo, or maybe Harvest (http://www.getharvest.com/ -- primary focus there is on time tracking.)

  79. PHP Support Tickets by DigitalReverend · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This isn't a bad package it works under linux and allows you to have different levels of users. Your customers are able to look up their tickets to watch the progress of resolution. (If you allow it)

    http://www.phpsupporttickets.com/

    --
    I read Slashdot for the headlines, because the headlines, unlike the articles, are usually original and never duplicated
  80. Basecamp by Lally+Singh · · Score: 1

    Try out Basecamp. It's pretty straightforward, and it's more than a cheap wrapper around a database. The views are well thought out, just the right amount of AJAX to make your day go easier, and good collaboration support. Start off free and pay if you need more than the free account provides. It doesn't get very expensive. If that's not your thing, put down another recommendation for trac.

    --
    Care about electronic freedom? Consider donating to the EFF!
  81. What the experts use by MadMagician · · Score: 1

    We've tried a variety of them, and RT is the favorite here [major university/supercomputer center's IT department]. [Likewise for some other centers].

  82. RT is the best by kokoko1 · · Score: 0

    We are running RT from last 2 years IMO its the best Open Source ticketing system.

    --
    http://askaralikhan.blogspot.com/
  83. Re:RT -- Use RoundUp instead.. by Intron · · Score: 1

    We used RoundUp for a while and had no problems with it.

    --
    Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
  84. Time Tracking vs Issue tracking by IvanLatysh · · Score: 1

    You had many advices of what to use for issue/ticket tracking but it is the only half of the deal. Time tracking is as much important as ticket tracking. I am releasing time tracking application written in Java in a week or so. http://code.google.com/p/time-ticker You are welcome to check it out.

    --
    -- Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity!
  85. Mojo Helpdesk by Chaswell · · Score: 2, Informative

    I read through a lot of the comments and saw so many mentions of enterprise level ticket tracking and development management. You actually asked for a ticket tracking for IT sidework. I use Mojo Helpdesk. They have a free plan, 30 day free trial for their pay plans and gives you a central location to track open issues and receive reedback from clients.

    Hope this helps.

  86. SysAid by Meorah · · Score: 1

    Java based web app, http://www.ilient.com/freeware.htm

    Linux version available. I like it because it integrates with LDAP (not avail with free version), uses existing email system for notifications, and lets me use an external DB. I think the free version requires you to use either firebird or derby embedded DB, but if you're small it shouldn't really matter.

    --
    Protector of Capitalist views,
    Meorah
    1. Re:SysAid by pchoppin · · Score: 0

      We've been using SysAid now for almost a year. Wonderful system. The asset management and service request systems are fully integrated and seamless. Support from SysAid is outstanding; better than any closed source company have ever worked with. They provide support via instant messenger, online chat, and phone. And of course they use their own product as a ticket support system on which you can submit support requests - all included in the purchase.

      The price is very, very reasonable. For our 150 user network we paid about $550 (USD). I priced similar systems and they were in the thousands.

      We could not be more pleased with the product. It's open source, Linux version available, and excellent support. What's not to like?

      --
      Take your mod and shove it!
  87. I have had success with: by RobertNotBob · · Score: 1
    I have had success with DCL.

    http://sourceforge.net/projects/dcl/

    It's been so long since we set it up, I frankly don't remember the details... but it has been running for years now without incident.

    enjoy!

    .

    --
    ___ I don't respond to Anonymous Cowards, and I Never Mod them UP.
  88. OneorZero by ultrashag · · Score: 1

    I would recommend http://www.oneorzero.com/. Lots of functionality and easy to use.

  89. Fallacy: "it is modifiable" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People here have mentioned RT, trac, jira and a couple of others. They are all very nice systems. There is also otrs and a gazillion others.

    Together with the suggestions there is often an add-on: "And you can customize it yourself".

    This is _not_ something you should plan to do up front. If the system is so small that you can see stuff you need that it doesn't do, don't choose that system. Your business is not going to make money off of you tweaking your ticketing system a couple of hundred hours. If you plan to have so little trade coming your way that you have time to customize a ticketing system, kill off that company right now and do something else.

    My 2 cents worth.

  90. open source help desk list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You guys might also want to check out the open source help desk list.

  91. Drupal + {casetracker | project} by Mr.+Jax · · Score: 1

    I've looked into this several times before as well and finally settled for a drupal installation with the casetracker module. All depends on your needs and what you'll use it for. Is it for software project management or also for general tasks? Should it be flexible out of the box or are you able to add features yourself? I think that even bugzilla is a possibility as a ticketing system. It just has its own special features.

  92. RT doesn't do "customers" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Baylink (who can't remember his password) writes:

    I never had problems with the interface, but it has been my (limited) experience that RT is not at all well tuned for situations where the 'customer' base is administratively separated: the "consultant" environment.

    All ticket posters are considered administratively separate; there's no standard built-in way to say "these reporters are all employed by customer 1517, and updates should also go to customer 1517's coordinator, nobody@example.com, in addition to anyone else listed", and reporting and status suffers similarly.

    Or so it was when I played with it last, in the late ... 3.2 days?

    It's tuned much more for corporate/collegiate internal helpdesk, in my view, though even those often want to group ticket reporters that way, and the issue's been discussed on the -users mailing list several times, most recently in a thread titled something like "RT 4.0?"

    I like RT a lot, actually, but I can't sell it to my bosses, because that functionality is critical to what we do here, and the compromises necessary to implement it via custom fields make it sufficiently opaque that my boss isn't interested.

    I'd have to dig back maybe 3 years into my email archive to find the mailing list traffic that ensued when I myself first raised the point, but my memory says that Jesse was pointedly uninterested in introducing that level of abstraction to the base system.

    "Use Asset Tracker" was the answer. AT requires that you treat 'customers' as 'assets', and *still* didn't -- so far as I could tell -- permit the "add the customer's 'official' contact to a ticket automatically" behaviour (or there was no cookbook available on how to custom-scrip it)... and AT may have been abandoned anyway, based on something I think I saw on the list a couple weeks ago.

  93. KnowIT by allowat76 · · Score: 1

    It is not open source, but my company uses a product called KnowIT as an enterprise level ticket tracking system. It is very helpful because it is more than just a ticket tracking system. It allows us to tie together all of the different IT domains into one platform.

    1. Re:KnowIT by DianeA · · Score: 1

      I've seen this platform, too, but we don't use it, yet. We're trying to evaluate how to roll it out in the next few months. I was kind of surprised at how much they cover. I saw the CEO of this company give a lecture at Princeton, about a month ago, on the topic of SaaS and its impact on how companies buy and use software. His name is Frank Guerino. He covered some pretty interesting stuff on how the world was moving to SaaS and on the specific technologies that are being used and made available. I especially like the Social Network Analsys stuff they're doing. I think he's right, I think the world is definitely starting to move in that direction and I'd like to see more articles on SaaS, in the future. I think businesses have already started moving in that direction but developers are way behind. - Diane

    2. Re:KnowIT by BLQWME · · Score: 0

      At the risk of driving my Karma even further South, did you even think about what you wrote? How many people with sensitive data to protect will move towards SaaS? If they have my data, they better not move that direction! Can you cite examples of the World moving to SaaS? I want to avoid the companies you cite. Just my .02, I think you will see the re-emergence of in-house development when companies are forced to provide/house their data on "public" servers.

      --
      "Nobody shoots anybody in the face unless you're a hit man or a video gamer"- Jack Thompson
  94. Centric CRM by TheDarkener · · Score: 1

    That's what I use, and it's worked great for me for 5 years running.

    http://www.centriccrm.com

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  95. Corrigo Via Nextel / Sprint? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi;

    I do a bit of network engineering consultation. I use a product I acquired via Nextel/Sprint connections for a monthly fee called Corrigo. The combination of online tracking plus mobile management is incredibly useful. I think I pay like $20 a month per person covering 3 friends and me who are part of the team.

  96. Vtiger by SlashdotCrackPot · · Score: 1

    Vtiger CRM 5 is what we have been using in the office for tracking tickets/accounts between 6 techs in 3 remote offices. Works great and it is AJAX based, so it is very customizable and easy to put a web portal up with for tickets on the go. Very, very easy to configure and pretty darn user friendly.

    http://vtiger.com/

  97. Possible Answer by erpsolutions · · Score: 1

    We are an SAP reseller. Several of our clients in this situation run SAP Business One. Let me know if you need a demo.

  98. ]project-open[ - Incidents, PM _and_ Finance by fraber · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.project-open.com/

    It's an all in one ticket tracker, CRM, timesheet, project management (including GanttCharts), WIKI, form, full-text-search, etc. and it includes financial management. So you can create invoices directly from the time you spent on tickets and projects.

    The downside: It uses TCL and AOLServer instead of PHP and Apache.

    1. Re:]project-open[ - Incidents, PM _and_ Finance by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      I did an extensive search just a few months ago (while extensive means it probably is not as intensive as it could be). About ]Project Open[ I saw two "flaws":
      1) Out of documentation, it seemed that the request tracking module was still not developed; since by the time I was specifically looking for issue trackers, that meant the end for it.
      2) It's based out of AolServer. I want Open Source because I can, well, open the source and tweak it; since I'm not an AOLServer/Tcl "fan" it went even lower on my list.

      That said, I must say its documentation (both user and API/code), feature list and overall "proffesional-looking" seems impresive at first glance, so if its "problems" are not problems for you, it might be the solution you are looking for (as a side not, a project manager where I work is testing ][ on his own and doesn't seem dissatisfied).

      What is my choice, then? Well, I went with OTRS, being RT the closest to it. But I find Trac to be very good at light-weight code-development oriented environments and, no, "light-weight" should not be consider as a defect: too many times the tool gets in the way instead of helping you; not the case with Trac.

      Oh, and neither OTRS nor RT or Trac use PHP. OTRS/RT are Perl+(various databases) and Trac is Python+(embebbed database by default, others supported). In my opinion, when having to look for something among a lot of projects, just vetoing PHP+MySQL will take away most not-up-to-the-task projects, so you'll get more time for interesting ones.

  99. Why not Bugzilla? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, maybe I am missing something obvious, but why hasn't anyone mentioned Bugzilla? Is it not suitable in some way I'm not seeing?

    I've used both BZ and Trac and I find BZ *far* easier to use and much more friendly than Trac. (I actually can't stand Trac.)

    So what am I missing here?

  100. bugzilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a lot of large companies use bugzilla with custom changes

    I've heard that's what Yahoo! uses, for example to track customer care reports and code changes internally.

    it's free

  101. BestPractical RT by -kevin- · · Score: 1

    I work at a help desk for that supports a 1/3 of the College of Engineering, and we use http://bestpractical.com/rt/

    Its Perl based, might be overkill for your purposes, but its very good and free.

  102. Re:RT -- Use RoundUp instead.. by pjp6259 · · Score: 1

    I thought slashdotters hated Monsanto! Or is that just on weekends? Come on people lets see some consistency here.

    (I kid, I kid)

    --
    Computers don't make mistakes. What they do, they do on purpose.
  103. How about: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Launchpad? *ducks*

  104. Tags: doyourownwork by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whoever set this tag is a silly troll who should have their account prohibited from tagging stories.

  105. It's more work then you might think by TheDreadedGMan · · Score: 1

    Sorry I don't have an answer for you at this time.

    I work for a company, our main product is very closely described by the article summary.
    Given the size and complexity of our product, (which logs jobs then allows you to log labour and stock/parts against the job then tracks all that for invoicing later on plus numerous other features like Purchase Orders, Invoicing, reporting) I can see why there is no readily available Open-Source or free alternative... Sure there are issue and bug trackers which work quite well, when it comes to more complex features like job completion (and invoicing) these solutions turn to something else.
    If anyone can find the killer application, I will be very interested to look into it, comparing it to our system.

  106. Perfect Solution by flcpuman · · Score: 1

    A company called Internet Software Sciences has the perfect solution for your needs. Their link is http://www.inet-sciences.com/ The software is free for up to 3 logins at the same time. It runs on windows and Linux. Can use an MDB or SQL database backend and has all the setup instructions for both. It is completely web based so it has many possibilities. Also it has everything you need from customer to ticket to time to asset tracking. It even has full invoicing capabilities. I've seen this software come a long way from when it first appeared on Sourceforge to the great product it is now. Check it out. You won't be disappointed.

  107. OTRS is great by heybo · · Score: 1

    We've been using OTRS http://otrs.org/ for quite a few years and love it. It just plain works. It can use LDAP for a customer DB which can be also used with SugarCRM if a CRM is needed. We also use the LDAP directory to control the Java Messaging system for mail. We have had no down time in 4 years using this system. Its written in Perl and uses MYSQL for a DB. Yes it runs on Linux!

  108. Autotask is the way to go! by jbbb · · Score: 1

    For what you are describing, Autotask (http://www.autotask.com/) is definitely the way to go.

    I've been using it for over a year now, and I know of tons of guys that are IT consultants, service providers, etc that use it.

    Most of the other things mentioned here are generic ticketing systems. Autotask is software that is meant for IT consultants to use to manage their work. It handles service ticketing, project work, time tracking, invoicing, contracts and a lot more, all integrated.

    Don't bother with a generic ticketing system. You'll end up wasting your time.

  109. DCL and dotProject are good FOSS appls by ralfalot · · Score: 1

    I have used DCL extensively and love it. If you haven't given it a look, you should (http://dcl.sourceforge.net/). Their website is not that pretty, but the tool is great. Another tool with more breadth, but less depth, is dotProject (http://www.dotproject.net/). Many ISPs will install this for you.

  110. Autotask is the way to go! by jbbb · · Score: 1

    For what you are describing, Autotask (http://www.autotask.com/) is definitely the way to go.

    I've been using it for over a year now, and I know of tons of guys that are IT consultants, service providers, etc that use it.

    Most of the other things mentioned here are generic ticketing systems. Autotask is software that is meant for IT consultants to use to manage their work. It handles service ticketing, project work, time tracking, invoicing, contracts and a lot more, all integrated.

    Don't bother with a generic ticketing system. You'll end up wasting your time.

  111. Redmine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We looked into ticket systems a while back, and the previously mentioned http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_ticket- tracking_systems was very helpful. We were looking for a non-commercial solution that was easy to deploy and had some nice features (including time tracking). We settled on RedMine (http://www.redmine.org/). It's written in Ruby on Rails, which makes it extremely easy to get up and running if you're familiar with the technology. It's fairly speedy and includes a gantt graph, calendar, SCM (subversion, darcs, mercurial, and cvs in the development version) integration, ldap authentication, etc, etc. Might not be exactly what you're looking for, but it works fine for us. We've got some 30 projects going with it.

  112. Perfect Solutions by flcpuman · · Score: 1

    A company called Internet Software Sciences has the perfect solution for your needs. Their link is http://www.inet-sciences.com/ [inet-sciences.com] The software is free for up to 3 logins at the same time. It runs on windows and Linux. Can use an MDB or SQL database backend and has all the setup instructions for both. It is completely web based so it has many possibilities. Also it has everything you need from customer to ticket to time to asset tracking. It even has full invoicing capabilities. I've seen this software come a long way from when it first appeared on Sourceforge to the great product it is now. Check it out. You won't be disappointed.

  113. Here's a good resource for you by lhand · · Score: 1

    When I was searching for yet another request tracker a while back, I came across:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_issue_t racking_systems

    Personally, over the years, I've used Bugzilla, RT and Mantis and they are all very good. Bugzilla is hard for non-techies to understand. Mantis may be a little feature poor and is good for simple bug tracking. RT seems to be the best for general use by techies and muggles alike.

  114. Here's a list of open source help desk software by johnpspeno · · Score: 1

    http://www.opensourcehelpdesklist.com/

    If you've used any of the products on the list, you can now add your comments about them.

    Personally, I'm a happy HelpSpot customer. It's not open source and it's a great product. At least the db is open and the next version has its own API.