Senders using the mark are verifying that the e-mail meets one of the following criteria: the e-mail is sent to only one recipient...
How will the law differentiate between different emails sent to different people, and a message that is changed ever so slightly for each recipient? Then the copies would be in some sense each to one recipient.
Well, I don't know about life, but take a one-dimensional universe first. Place a bunch of points in it (they will all be on a straight line). Each point can only be connected with two neighbouring points.
Now do the same with a two-dimensional universe (try with pen and paper). Connect one point to all of the other points without any lines crossing. No do the same for another point (this should be possible). However, there will no longer be any other way of connecting a third point with all the remaining points.
I believe that it is possible to connect all points to all others in three dimensions, which is probably handy for life and stuff.
In C++, you could get much the same benefits of a pointer that checks itself for being non null each time it is dereferenced and throws an exception if it is null. Just use a smart pointer template class which is smart in that particular way.
Save the unchecked pointers for the most speed critical part of the program.
How about this for a legitimate reason? Some toerag steals my phone, reprograms the IMEI and is going to use it. I track him down, rough him up a bit and take back my phone. I'd then want to change it back to it's original number so that I could use it again.
If someone didn't want you to do that on a PC, then they could always disable CD (and floppy) booting in the BIOS, and then set a BIOS password. Voila, now the machine only boots from the hard disk.
Of course, a really determined person could rest the BIOS, but they'd probably get noticed when they took the case apart to do so.
Also, in the UK you don't need a license to have a radio. If you are blind, it is possible to get a radio that picks up the sound only from TV broadcasts. Such a device does not require a license either.
I'm sure there are a FEW cases of people surviving, but the majority usually die upon impact.
I remember a case of a person whose parachute failed, but survived after landing in a small pond about four feet deep. Seriously. I think he broke several bones though.
Slashdot Mirror
Senders using the mark are verifying that the e-mail meets one of the following criteria: the e-mail is sent to only one recipient ...
How will the law differentiate between different emails sent to different people, and a message that is changed ever so slightly for each recipient? Then the copies would be in some sense each to one recipient.
Five pints - I've drunk that much in bber before going to the loo. Usually I need to break the seal after four though...
I presume that the bladder isn't ever holding it all, but that a lot is just sitting in the stomach awaiting processing.
Well, I don't know about life, but take a one-dimensional universe first. Place a bunch of points in it (they will all be on a straight line). Each point can only be connected with two neighbouring points.
Now do the same with a two-dimensional universe (try with pen and paper). Connect one point to all of the other points without any lines crossing. No do the same for another point (this should be possible). However, there will no longer be any other way of connecting a third point with all the remaining points.
I believe that it is possible to connect all points to all others in three dimensions, which is probably handy for life and stuff.
You know what... there is no easter bunny, over there is just a guy in a suit.
In C++, you could get much the same benefits of a pointer that checks itself for being non null each time it is dereferenced and throws an exception if it is null. Just use a smart pointer template class which is smart in that particular way.
Save the unchecked pointers for the most speed critical part of the program.
How about this for a legitimate reason? Some toerag steals my phone, reprograms the IMEI and is going to use it. I track him down, rough him up a bit and take back my phone. I'd then want to change it back to it's original number so that I could use it again.
If someone didn't want you to do that on a PC, then they could always disable CD (and floppy) booting in the BIOS, and then set a BIOS password. Voila, now the machine only boots from the hard disk.
Of course, a really determined person could rest the BIOS, but they'd probably get noticed when they took the case apart to do so.
If the Royal Mail controlled email, would I have to pay to receive it in the morning?
Also, in the UK you don't need a license to have a radio. If you are blind, it is possible to get a radio that picks up the sound only from TV broadcasts. Such a device does not require a license either.
I'm sure there are a FEW cases of people surviving, but the majority usually die upon impact.
I remember a case of a person whose parachute failed, but survived after landing in a small pond about four feet deep. Seriously. I think he broke several bones though.
Mac users will never be smarter until they embrace the adverb.
It's "Think Differently".